The Effect of Organ System Surgery on Intensive Care Unit Mortality in a Cohort of Critically Ill Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: The critical illness burden in the United States is growing with an aging population obtaining surgical intervention despite age-related comorbidities. The effect of organ system surgical intervention on intensive care units (ICUs) mortality is unknown. METHODS: We performed an 8-year retrospective analysis of surgical ICU patients. Poisson regression analysis was performed assessing the relative risk of in-hospital mortality based on surgical intervention. RESULTS: Of 468 000 ICU patients included, 97 968 (20.9%) were surgical admissions and 97 859 (99.9%) had complete outcomes data. Nonsurvivors were older (68.8 ± 15.4 vs. 62.7 ± 15.8 years, P < .001) with higher Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III Scores (81.4 ± 33.6 vs. 46.7 ± 20.1, P < .001. Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 1,558, 7.8%), musculoskeletal (n = 277, 5.5%), and neurological (n = 884, 4.6%) system operations had the highest mortality. Upon Poisson regression model, patients undergoing emergent operative interventions on the neurologic system (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.67-2.07, P < .001) had increased relative risk of mortality when compared to emergent operative interventions on the cardiovascular system after controlling for pertinent covariates. Elective operative interventions on the respiratory (RR 2.39, 95% CI 2.03-2.80, P < .001), GI (RR 2.34, 95% CI 2.10-2.61, P < .001), and skin and soft tissue (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.77-2.89, P < .001) systems had increased risk of mortality when compared to elective cardiovascular system surgery after controlling for pertinent covariates. CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in the risk of mortality based on organ system of operative intervention. The prognostication of critically ill patients undergoing surgical intervention is currently not accounted for in prognostic scoring systems.

Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with concomitant urologic malignancy: treatment results in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair.

During diagnostic workup for urologic malignancies, an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is identified in a proportion of patients. In the era of open AAA repair, these patients presented a surgical dilemma with regard to the sequence of the operations: cancer treatment first or AAA repair first? Previous assessments have concluded that irrespective of the followed strategy, the early and mediumterm mortality from the two operative procedures in this patient category was significant. With the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), the mortality and morbidity associated with the treatment of both pathologic conditions may be more favorable than with open aneurysm repair. The objective of this study was to assess, in an institutional series of patients receiving EVAR, the early and long-term survival and complication rates in patients with urologic malignancies. In a series of 385 patients receiving EVAR, 14 had a concomitant urologic malignancy: renal cell carcinoma (5 patients), prostate carcinoma (6 patients), and carcinoma of the bladder (3 patients). The first-month mortality was nil. Long-term survival was 80%, 83%, and 67% for the three tumor types, respectively. EVAR offers improved treatment in patients with concomitant AAA and urologic malignancy and should be considered the first choice for these patients.

[Evaluation of patients with urogenital trauma managed in a urology clinic]. / Klinikte tedavi edilen ürogenital travma hastalarinin degerlendirilmesi.

BACKGROUND: Ten percent of all traumas, responsible for 14% of all deaths, involve the urogenital system. We retrospectively evaluated the patients with genitourinary trauma who underwent any kind of management modality in our clinics. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients (92 males, 16 females; mean age 35.8+/-17.5 years; range 6 to 87 years) with urogenital trauma between 2003 and 2007 according to age, gender, type of trauma, affected organ, grade of trauma, accompanying other-organ injuries, radiological imaging techniques, and treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (63%) had blunt, 25 (24%) had penetrating, and 12 (11%) had iatrogenic trauma, and 3 patients (3%) had spontaneous organ injury. When we considered the affected organ, renal trauma was determined in 34 patients (32%), ureteral trauma in 11 (10%), bladder injuries in 18 (17%), urethral trauma in 27 (25%), testicular trauma in 6 (6%), and penile trauma in 12 (10%) patients. Seventeen patients (50%) had grade 3, 11 (32%) had grade 4 and 6 (18%) had grade 5 renal injury; 6 patients of these cases underwent surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results were parallel to those available in the literature. Due to the lack of sufficient information about urogenital trauma rates in our country, it would be highly useful for reference centers to evaluate and publish their own data.

Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of age on the risk of in-hospital mortality and morbidity following urogynecologic surgery and to compare risks associated with obliterative versus reconstructive procedures for prolapse in elderly women. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from 1998 to 2002 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to obtain odds ratios estimating the effect of age on risk of death and complications, adjusting for comorbidities and demographic factors. RESULTS: There were 264,340 women in our study population. Increasing age was associated with higher mortality risks per 1000 women (< 60 years, 0.1; 60-69 years, 0.5; 70-79 years, 0.9; > or = 80 years, 2.8; P < .01) and higher complication risks per 1000 women (< 60 years, 140; 60-69 years, 130; 70-79 years, 160; > or = 80 years, 200; P < .01). Using multivariable logistic regression, increasing age was associated with an increased risk of death (60-69 years, odds ratio [OR] 3.4 [95% CI 1.7-6.9]; 70-79 years, OR 4.9 [95% CI 2.2-10.9]; > or = 80 years, OR 13.6 [95% CI 5.9-31.4]), compared with women < 60 years. The risk of peri-operative complications was also higher in elderly women 80 years of age and older (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3-1.5]) compared with younger women. Elderly women 80 years and over who underwent obliterative procedures had a lower risk of complication compared with those who underwent reconstructive procedures for prolapse (17.0% vs 24.7%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Although the absolute risk of death is low, elderly women have a higher risk of mortality and morbidity following urogynecologic surgery.