Pressure-garment therapy for preventing hypertrophic scarring after burn injury.

BACKGROUND: Burn damage to skin often results in scarring; however in some individuals the failure of normal wound-healing processes results in excessive scar tissue formation, termed 'hypertrophic scarring'. The most commonly used method for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring is pressure-garment therapy (PGT). PGT is considered standard care globally; however, there is continued uncertainty around its effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of pressure-garment therapy for the prevention of hypertrophic scarring after burn injury. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registers on 8 June 2023 with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PGT (alone or in combination with other scar-management therapies) with scar management therapies not including PGT, or comparing different PGT pressures or different types of PGT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion using predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 studies in this review (1179 participants), 14 of which (1057 participants) presented useable data. The sample size of included studies ranged from 17 to 159 participants. Most studies included both adults and children. Eight studies compared a pressure garment (with or without another scar management therapy) with scar management therapy alone, five studies compared the same pressure garment at a higher pressure versus a lower pressure, and two studies compared two different types of pressure garments. Studies used a variety of pressure garments (e.g. in-house manufactured or a commercial brand). Types of scar management therapies included were lanolin massage, topical silicone gel, silicone sheet/dressing, and heparin sodium ointment. Meta-analysis was not possible as there was significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity between studies. Main outcome measures were scar improvement assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) or the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) (or both), pain, pruritus, quality of life, adverse events, and adherence to therapy. Studies additionally reported a further 14 outcomes, mostly individual scar parameters, some of which contributed to global scores on the VSS or POSAS. The amount of evidence for each individual outcome was limited. Most studies had a short follow-up, which may have affected results as the full effect of any therapy on scar healing may not be seen until around 18 months. PGT versus no treatment/lanolin We included five studies (378 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on whether PGT improves scars as assessed by the VSS compared with no treatment/lanolin. The evidence is also very uncertain for pain, pruritus, adverse events, and adherence. No study used the POSAS or assessed quality of life. One additional study (122 participants) did not report useable data. PGT versus silicone We included three studies (359 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of PGT compared with silicone, as assessed by the VSS and POSAS. The evidence is also very uncertain for pain, pruritus, quality of life, adverse events, adherence, and other scar parameters. It is possible that silicone may result in fewer adverse events or better adherence compared with PGT but this was also based on very low-certainty evidence. PGT plus silicone versus no treatment/lanolin We included two studies (200 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on whether PGT plus silicone improves scars as assessed by the VSS compared with no treatment/lanolin. The evidence is also very uncertain for pain, pruritus, and adverse events. No study used the POSAS or assessed quality of life or adherence. PGT plus silicone versus silicone We included three studies (359 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of PGT plus silicone compared with silicone, as assessed by the VSS and POSAS. The evidence is also very uncertain for pain, pruritus, quality of life, adverse events, and adherence. PGT plus scar management therapy including silicone versus scar management therapy including silicone We included one study (88 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of PGT plus scar management therapy including silicone versus scar management therapy including silicone, as assessed by the VSS and POSAS. The evidence is also very uncertain for pain, pruritus, quality of life, adverse events, and adherence. High-pressure versus low-pressure garments We included five studies (262 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of high pressure versus low pressure PGT on adverse events and adherence. No study used the VSS or the POSAS or assessed pain, pruritus, or quality of life. Different types of PGT (Caroskin Tricot + an adhesive silicone gel sheet versus Gecko Nanoplast (silicone gel bandage)) We included one study (60 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of Caroskin Tricot versus Gecko Nanoplast on the POSAS, pain, pruritus, and adverse events. The study did not use the VSS or assess quality of life or adherence. Different types of pressure garments (Jobst versus Tubigrip) We included one study (110 participants). The evidence is very uncertain on the adherence to either Jobst or Tubigrip. This study did not report any other outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend using either PGT or an alternative for preventing hypertrophic scarring after burn injury. PGT is already commonly used in practice and it is possible that continuing to do so may provide some benefit to some people. However, until more evidence becomes available, it may be appropriate to allow patient preference to guide therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Treatment with Concomitant Topical Corticosteroids in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for children younger than 6 years with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited, as systemic immunosuppressants may present safety concerns in this young age group. Dupilumab is the first systemic treatment option approved for infants and young children with severe AD in the European Union. This study reports the efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant low-potency corticosteroids in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD. METHODS: This was a pre-specified subgroup analysis of data for patients aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD at baseline (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] = 4) from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of dupilumab. Patients were randomised to either subcutaneously administered dupilumab (200/300 mg) or matched placebo every 4 weeks, plus low-potency topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Co-primary endpoints at week 16 were the proportion of patients with IGA ≤ 1 (clear or almost clear skin) and the proportion of patients with ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Secondary endpoints at week 16 included mean changes in EASI, pruritus, skin pain, sleep loss and quality of life. RESULTS: The analysis included 125 patients (63 receiving dupilumab vs. 62 placebo). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab vs. placebo had achieved IGA ≤ 1 (14.3% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.0085) and EASI-75 (46.0% vs. 6.6%; P < 0.0001). Significant improvements with dupilumab were observed in all secondary endpoints, including a least squares mean 48.9% reduction in pruritus. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups (66.7% vs. 73.8%). No dupilumab-related AEs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD with acceptable safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434, part B.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that is relatively common in infants and young children worldwide. Severe AD causes skin rashes and intense itch that strongly interfere with sleep quality and normal daily activities, thereby affecting the quality of life of patients and their families. When therapies for AD that are applied to the skin do not work, limited options are available to treat severe AD in children younger than 6 years. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD, recruited from various sites in Europe and North America. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (based on the child's weight) or placebo, together with mild steroids applied to the skin, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, AD severity was greatly improved in patients receiving dupilumab, with 14% of patients achieving almost clear skin. Patients receiving dupilumab also experienced significant improvements in itch intensity, sleep quality, skin pain, and quality of life. Furthermore, dupilumab did not increase the risk of infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab can be effective at treating severe AD in infants and young children, with important benefits for the quality of life of patients and their families.

Ondansetron for the Prevention of Pruritus in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery With Intrathecal Opioid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a frequently reported and unpleasant side effect following intrathecal opioid use with frequency further increased among parturients. We have performed a systematic review to assess the overall efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of pruritus in patients receiving intrathecal opioid as part of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted from date of inception to September 2022. Studies that included patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia using intrathecal opioid were included. The primary outcome was the presence of pruritus, and the secondary outcome was time to onset of pruritus. Data from included studies were pooled for analysis using an appropriately determined random-effects model. Outcomes were presented using forest plots and 95% confidence intervals. Additional sensitivity and subgroup analysis were performed. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with a total of 2586 patients were included: 1219 received ondansetron, 1030 received a placebo, and a further 337 received a different study drug and were excluded from analysis. Opioids used in the included studies were morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil. Patients who received ondansetron showed a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus compared to the control group (RR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.92; I 2 = 64%). There was no significant difference in pruritus onset between the groups (mean difference [MD], 17.54 minutes; 95% CI, -2.18 to 37.26; I 2 = 83%). The overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of quality of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus following the use of ondansetron. This is in contrast to previously published meta-analyses. Studies included were of varying quality and some at high risk of bias with a high degree of statistical heterogeneity. Furthermore, high-quality and well-powered studies are required to confirm these findings.

Prophylatic use of IV nalmefene to prevent epidural opioid-induced pruritus: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The incidence of pruritus from neuraxial opioids is about 60%. Pruritus causes discomfort and decreases the quality of recovery. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial was aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effects of a single dose IV nalmefene on the incidence and severity of epidural opioid-induced pruritus within 24 h after surgeries. DESIGN: A two-center, randomized, double blinded, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023 at two tertiary care hospitals in China. PATIENTS: Patients aged between 18 and 80 years-old who underwent elective surgeries and received epidural analgesia intra- and post-operatively were screened for study enrollment. A total of 306 patients were enrolled, 302 patients underwent randomization and 296 patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS: The nalmefene group was prophylactically given 0.5 µg/kg nalmefene intravenously while the control group was given the same volume of saline. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the incidence of pruritus within 24 h after surgeries. The secondary endpoints included time of the first patient-reported pruritus, severity of pruritus after surgeries, severity of acute pain scores after surgeries and other anesthesia/analgesia related side effects. MAIN RESULTS: Pruritus occurred in 51 of the 147 (34.69%) patients in the control group and 35 of the 149 (23.49%) patients in the nalmefene group (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.96; P = 0.034) within 24 h postoperatively. Nalmefene group demonstrated delayed onset of pruritus, reduced severity of pruritus and decreased vomiting within 24 h after surgery. There were no significant differences in postoperative analgesia and the incidence of other anesthesia/analgesia associated side effects. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of 0.5 µg/kg nalmefene intravenously significantly reduced the incidence and severity of epidural-opioid induced pruritus within 24 h after surgery without affecting the efficacy of epidural analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) and the registration number is ChiCTR2100050463. Registered on August 27th, 2021.

Crisaborole Inhibits Itch and Pain by Preventing Neutrophil Infiltration in a Mouse Model of Atopic Dermatitis.

Crisaborole, a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis is often associated with increased pain. Using a mouse model, this study investigated whether crisaborole suppresses pain associated with atopic dermatitis and the potential mechanisms underlying it. The mouse model for atopic dermatitis was developed by repeatedly applying MC903. MC903-treated mice had increased spontaneous scratching (itch-related behaviour) and wiping behaviour (pain-related behaviour). Crisaborole was topically applied to the cheek skin of MC903-treated mice, and it reduced both itch- and pain-related behaviours in these mice. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that crisaborole reduced neutrophil infiltration and interaction of neutrophils with sensory neurones. Intradermal injection of S100A8/A9, proinflammatory neutrophil mediator, enhanced not only itch-related behaviours evoked by histamine or chloroquine, but also pain-related behaviours evoked by capsaicin. Calcium imaging of mouse dorsal root ganglion neurones revealed that pretreatment with S100A8/A9 significantly increased calcium responses to histamine and capsaicin, and the proportion of chloroquine-sensitive neurones. These findings suggest that the PDE4 inhibitor reduces itch and pain, in part by inhibiting infiltration of S100A8/A9-containing neutrophils in a mouse model of MC903-induced atopic dermatitis.

Pharmacological agents for prevention of pruritus in women undergoing Caesarean delivery with neuraxial morphine: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial opioids provide effective analgesia for Caesarean delivery, however, pruritus can be a troubling side-effect. Effective agents to prevent pruritus are needed. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to provide clinicians with a comparison of relative efficacy of available interventions to reduce the incidence of pruritus, induced by either intrathecal or epidural single-shot morphine, in women undergoing Caesarean delivery. METHODS: Databases systematically searched (up to January 2022) included PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and two Cochrane databases. We included randomised, controlled trials involving adult female patients undergoing Caesarean delivery. We pooled trials comparing interventions used for preventing pruritus after Caesarean delivery and performed a Bayesian model network meta-analysis. RESULTS: The final primary network included data from comparisons of 14 distinct interventions (including placebo) used to reduce the incidence of pruritus in 6185 participants. We judged five interventions to be 'definitely superior' to placebo: propofol, opioid agonist-antagonists (neuraxial), opioid antagonists, opioid agonist-antagonists (systemic), and serotonin antagonists. For the network evaluating the incidence of severe pruritus (warranting additional therapeutic treatment of pruritus), data were available for 14 interventions (including placebo) in 4489 patients. For this outcome, we judged three interventions to be 'definitely superior' to placebo: dopamine antagonists (neuraxial) and systemic and neuraxial opioid agonist-antagonists. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found several interventions to be effective in reducing the incidence of pruritus. Although sub-hypnotic doses of propofol appear to have an antipruritic effect, replication of this finding and further investigation of optimal dosing are warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42022367058).

Servicio de Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico prestado desde la farmacia comunitaria como práctica asistencial para la optimización de la farmacoterapia en paciente con urticaria y prurito / Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-Up Service provided by the community pharmacy as a care practice for the optimization of pharmacotherapy in patients with urticaria and pruritus

Se ofreció el Servicio de Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico (SFT) a una mujer de 66 años, exfumadora, diagnosticada de hipertensión arterial, hipercolesterolemia, asma, ansiedad y migraña, que presentaba prurito y urticaria. Tomaba 5 medicamentos. Tras revisión de la farmacoterapia y realización de una entrevista en profundidad, se determinó la presencia de prurito y urticaria como Resultados Negativos asociados a la Medicación (RNM) de inseguridad derivado del uso de rosuvastatina/ezetimiba por posibles Problemas Relacionados con los Medicamentos (PRM) y, de probabilidad de efecto adverso y de error en la prescripción del fármaco. Se propuso a la paciente suspender el tratamiento y se realizó derivación al Médico de Atención Primaria (MAP) mediante informe de derivación que fue entregado por la paciente en cita médica, para valorar alternativa farmacológica para tratar la hipercolesterolemia. La propuesta fue aceptada por el MAP. Se realizó un seguimiento del caso, que permitió constatar la resolución de los PRM y RNM detectados, logrando una mejora en la salud del paciente y favoreciendo la adherencia al tratamiento (AU)

A 66-year-old woman, ex-smoker, diagnosed with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, asthma, anxiety and migraine, who presented pruritus and urticaria, was given Medication Review with Follow-Up Service (MRF). She was taking 5 medications. After the review of the pharmacotherapy and conducting an in-depth interview, the presence of pruritus and urticaria was determined as a Negative Outcomes Releated to Medicines (NOM) and a Drug Related Problem (DRP) derived from the use of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe, and a possible DRPs of probability of adverse effects and prescription error. It was proposed to the patient to suspend the treatment and a referral was made to the Primary Care Physician (PCP) by means of a referral report that was submitted by the patient at the medical appoint ment to assess a pharmacological alternative to treat hypercholesterolemia. The proposal was accepted by the PCP. A follow-up of the case was carried out, which allowed verifying the resolution of the DRPs and NOMs detected, achieving an improvement in the patient’s health and favoring adherence to treatment (AU)

Comparison of the ED50 of prophylactic butorphanol in preventing morphine-induced pruritus with or without palonosetron: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized dose-response trial using an up-down sequential allocation method.

BACKGROUND: Butorphanol has been used to reduce the incidence and severity of neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus. Palonosetron is a commonly used antiemetic for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aim of our study was to compare the effective dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of intravenous butorphanol infusion with or without a single intravenous bolus of palonosetron for preventing pruritus induced by epidural administration of morphine. METHODS: A total of 120 parturients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous bolus injection of palonosetron plus continuous infusion of butorphanol (Group P + B) or an intravenous bolus of saline plus continuous infusion of butorphanol (Group B) after epidural administration of morphine. The antipruritic effect was graded as satisfactory (numerical rating scale (NRS) of pruritus ≤3) or unsatisfactory (NRS >3) within 48 h after morphine treatment. The first patient in each group received butorphanol infusion at a rate of 4 µg/kg/h. The infusion dose for each subsequent patient in the corresponding group was increased by 0.2 µg/kg/h after an unsatisfactory response or decreased by 0.2 µg/kg/h after a satisfactory response. The ED50 was calculated for each group and compared using up-down sequential analysis. RESULTS: The ED50 (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) of the dose of intravenous butorphanol infusion for preventing moderate to severe pruritus was lower in Group P + B (3.29 µg/kg/min [3.25-3.34 µg/kg/min]) than in Group B (3.57 µg/kg/min [3.47-3.67 µg/kg/min]) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of the present study, a prophylactic use of 0.25 mg palonosetron reduced the ED50 of prophylactic infusion of butorphanol by approximately 8% to achieve a satisfactory antipruritic effect after epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia.

Anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects of Chi-Huang Solution in a murine model of allergic contact dermatitis.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: In treating atopic dermatitis, multi-mode management is adopted, including trying to avoid the allergens, controlling and preventing secondary infections, and using drugs to control itching. At present, most of the commonly used anti-pruritic drugs in the clinic are single-target and lead to serious side effects. Many studies have shown that a variety of traditional Chinese medicines have significant anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects, and have the characteristics of multiple components, multiple targets, and multiple effects. AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aimed to explore the anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects of the Chi-Huang Solution in a murine model of Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). This study considers the effectiveness of the Chi-Huang Solution for external use on skin to provide an experimental basis for the clinical development and application of Chinese medicine and related preparations for Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two male SPF C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into control group (n = 6), ACD model group (n = 6), HAC control group (n = 6), and 4 Chi-Huang Solution groups (n = 6 in each group). With SADBE induce the murine model of ACD chronic pruritus, and initially evaluate whether the model is successful by counting scratching behavior, measuring the skin fold thickness and skin lesion score within 1 h. After treating the ACD model mice with deionized water, HAC, 1CH, 2CH, 3CH, and 4CH for 7 days, behavioral changes were used to evaluate the anti-pruritic effect. The skin fold thickness, skin lesion score, and spleen index were used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of the Chi-Huang Solution. H.E. staining was used for the epidermal thickness measurement and pathological evaluation. RT-qPCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of related inflammatory factors such as IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-33, IL-4, IL-17A, CXCL10, and its receptor CXCR3 in the skin of the lesion site, as well as to detect the mRNA expression of pruritus-related genes such as TRPV1, TRPA1, and GRP in DRG. RESULTS: After the treatment of low-dose (0.1 g/mL) and medium-dose (0.2 g/mL) Chi-Huang Solution, the scratching times both decreased significantly (P < 0.05), meanwhile the medium-dose Chi-Huang Solution had an obvious effect on reducing scratches/scab score (P < 0.05). Moreover, no matter what dose it takes, all Chi-Huang Solution can alleviate the epidermal thickening (P < 0.05) and the infiltration of mast cells in the ACD murine model of ACD. It is worth mentioning that the count of mast cells in the dermis was significantly down-regulated after the treatment of medium-dose Chi-Huang Solution (P < 0.005). Furthermore, Chi-Huang Solution can significantly down-regulate the mRNA expression of related inflammatory factors in the skin, and reduce the mRNA expression of pruritus-related genes, such as TRPA1, TRPV1, and GRP in the spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that Chi-Huang Solution for external use exhibits significant anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects on SADBE-induced ACD chronic pruritus murine models. Chi-Huang Solution might emerge as an effective drug for the treatment of CAD and high-dose Chi-Huang Solution (0.4 g/ml) has better comprehensive effects.

Biliary diversion in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biliary diversion (BD) is indicated in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) with refractory pruritus. Three types-partial external biliary drainage (PEBD), partial internal biliary drainage (PIBD), and ileal exclusion (IE) are described, with no consensus about the relative efficacy of these procedures. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for publications on PFIC and BD. Improvement in pruritus, serum bile acid (BA), and need for liver transplantation (LT) were compared between the various BD procedures. RESULTS: 25 studies [424 children (PEBD-301, PIBD-93, IE-30)] were included. Pruritus resolved in 59.5% [PIBD:72% (95%CI 43-96%), PEBD:57% (95%CI 43-71%) and IE:48% (95%CI 14-82%)] cases. Significant overlap in confidence intervals indicated no significant differences. Absolute decrease in BA (AUROC-0.72) and bilirubin (AUROC-0.69) discriminated responders and non-responders. Eventually, 27% required LT: PIBD 10.7%, PEBD32%, IE 27%. The post-operative BA (AUROC-0.9) and bilirubin (AUROC-0.85) determined need for LT. Complications were commoner in PEBD than PIBD (38% vs 21.8%: p=0.02). CONCLUSION: 59.5% children have pruritus relief after BD and 27% need LT. PIBD has lower complications and LT requirement than PEBD. However, this requires cautious interpretation as the 2 groups differed in PFIC type and follow-up duration.

Effective treatment of atopic dermatitis in small children significantly improves the quality of life of patients and their families.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has a severe impact on quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of AD on QoL of small children with moderate-to-severe AD in a tertiary health care hospital in Helsinki, Finland. MATERIALS & METHODS: Based on interim analysis of this longitudinal follow-up study, we investigated treatment response (topical corticosteroids vs. tacrolimus) and QoL of 152 small children with moderate-to-severe AD. RESULTS: The tacrolimus group had a significantly better treatment response at 12 months visit, but thereafter no differences were observed (p = 0.029; Mann-Whitney U test). The odds ratio for group comparisons was 2.258 (CI: 1.151-4.431). There was a significant improvement in QoL during follow-up in both treatment groups. Our study showed substantial improvements in disease severity and QoL based on active management and effective treatments in small children with AD. The main improvement was seen during the first year in both treatment groups with a lasting response. CONCLUSION: Effective treatment has a significant positive impact on the QoL of small children with AD and their families.

Antipruritic Effect of Nalbuphine, a Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonist, in Mice: A Pan Antipruritic.

Antipruritic effects of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists have been shown in rodent models of acute and chronic scratching (itchlike behavior). Three KOR agonists, nalfurafine, difelikefalin, and nalbuphine, are in clinical studies for antipruritic effects in chronic itch of systemic and skin diseases. Nalfurafine (in Japan) and difelikefalin (in the USA) were approved to be used in the treatment of chronic itch in hemodialysis patients. The FDA-approved nalbuphine has been used in clinic for over 40 years, and it is the only narcotic agonist that is not scheduled. We aimed to study (a) antiscratch activity of nalbuphine against TAT-HIV-1 protein (controls HIV transcription)-, deoxycholic acid (DCA, bile acid)-, and chloroquine (CQ)-induced scratching in a mouse model of acute itch; and (b) whether the effect of nalbuphine is produced via KORs. First, dose-responses were developed for pruritogens. Mice were pretreated with nalbuphine (0.3-10 mg/kg) and then a submaximal dose of pruritogens were administered and the number of scratching bouts was counted. To study if the antiscratch effect of nalbuphine is produced via KOR, we used KOR knock out mice and pharmacologic inhibition of KORs using nor-binaltorphimine, a KOR antagonist. For this aim, we used CQ as a pruritogen. We found that: (a) TAT-HIV-1 protein elicits scratching in a dose-dependent manner; (b) nalbuphine inhibits scratching induced by TAT-HIV-1, DCA, and CQ dose-dependently; and (c) nalbuphine inhibits scratching induced by CQ through KORs. In conclusion, nalbuphine inhibits scratching elicited by multiple pruritogens.

Onset Mechanism and Pharmaceutical Management of Dry Skin.

Dry skin is a common symptom of various conditions, and elderly individuals commonly exhibit this physiological symptom. Dry skin develops owing to sebum deficiency; however, the use of moisturizers can typically overcome this issue, particularly in patients in whom there are no other skin problems. If dry skin is left untreated, itching and eczema can occur, resulting in skin damage. Additionally, hemodialysis patients exhibit reduced barrier function and can experience pain associated with repeated needle insertion; the repeated use of lidocaine tape to manage the pain can cause further skin damage. To reduce the occurrence of dry skin, the skin is hydrated using moisturizers. Dry skin is also prominent in patients with varicose veins in the lower extremities, and many biochemical studies have shown that skin immunity is altered in patients with dry skin. Moreover, the incidences of dry skin and pruritus differ in male and female patients. Furthermore, in elderly patients, zinc deficiency is likely to cause dry skin, and zinc supplementation may maintain skin hydration. To date, few reports have described dry skin from a clinical point of view. In this review, research on dry skin is presented, and the findings of basic research studies are integrated.

Ondansetron versus ondansetron with dexamethasone to prevent intrathecal-morphine pruritus for caesarean patients: randomised double-blind trial.

The objective of this randomised, double blinded clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic administration of 4 mg ondansetron as monotherapy versus combination therapy of 4 mg ondansetron plus 8 mg dexamethasone for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-associated pruritus in caesarean section within 24 h. A total of 194 patients were included, 96 patients in the monotherapy group and 98 in the combination group. One hour after the operation, 11.5% of patients in ondansetron group had failure of prophylaxis for pruritus compared to 13.5% of patients in the combination group (p = .66). This decreased throughout the follow-up to reach 0.0% and 1.0% at 24 h in the ondansetron vs. the combination groups respectively. There was no superiority of combining ondansetron with dexamethasone over the use of ondansetron as prophylactic antipruritic in parturients receiving intrathecal morphine for caesarean section.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The incidence of pruritus has been reported to be between 36% and 60% in patients undergoing caesarean section with intrathecal morphine. Ondansetron has been identified as possible antipruritic agent while the antipruritic effect of dexamethasone is inconclusive.What do the results of this study add? The study demonstrated that there was no superiority of combining ondansetron with dexamethasone over the use of ondansetron as prophylactic antipruritic in parturients receiving intrathecal morphine for caesarean section. Moreover, it seems that there is no effect of combining ondansetron with dexamethasone over ondansetron alone on antiemetic consequences.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Ondansetron could be an effective antipruritic if used solely for patients undergoing caesarean section.

Prevention of Pruritis following Spinal Morphine for Scheduled Cesarean Birth.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia after cesarean birth, yet up to 90% of women who receive it experience excessive itching, an undesirable dose-dependent effect. Pruritis may increase nursing workload, delay breastfeeding, and decrease patient satisfaction. When 0.1 mg spinal morphine is given, pruritis is markedly reduced while analgesia is preserved. PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to determine possible causes and solutions for pruritus after cesarean birth. METHODS: Anesthesia providers were educated and encouraged to limit spinal morphine to 0.1 mg as a strategy to prevent pruritus. In a repeated measures design, the rate of treatment-required pruritus and opioid consumption were measured 24 hours after surgery. The project included an evaluation of 30 medical records before and 30 medical records after the project intervention. RESULTS: Preintervention rate of treatment-required pruritis was 37%, all received spinal morphine ≥ 1.5 mg. Postintervention rate of treatment-required pruritis was 13% and 57% after spinal morphine 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg, respectively. Opioid consumption was similar between groups. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Mother-baby nurses can have an impact on the practice of anesthesia providers by advocating for evidence-based dosing of intrathecal morphine to reduce the incidence of pruritis while maintaining effective analgesia for women after cesarean birth.

A structurally optimized FXR agonist, MET409, reduced liver fat content over 12 weeks in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefits of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been validated, although improvements in efficacy and/or tolerability remain elusive. Herein, we aimed to assess the performance of a structurally optimized FXR agonist in patients with NASH. METHODS: In this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated MET409 - a non-bile acid agonist with a unique chemical scaffold - in patients with NASH. Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mg (n = 20) or 50 mg (n = 19) of MET409, or placebo (n = 19). RESULTS: At Week 12, MET409 lowered liver fat content (LFC), with mean relative reductions of 55% (80 mg) and 38% (50 mg) vs. 6% in placebo (p <0.001). MET409 achieved ≥30% relative LFC reduction in 93% (80 mg) and 75% (50 mg) of patients vs. 11% in placebo (p <0.001) and normalized LFC (≤5%) in 29% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 0% in placebo (p <0.05). An increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was observed with MET409, confounding Week 12 changes from baseline (-25% for 80 mg, 28% for 50 mg). Nonetheless, MET409 achieved ≥30% relative ALT reduction in 50% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 17% in placebo. MET409 was associated with on-target high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases (mean changes of -23.4% for 80 mg and -20.3% for 50 mg vs. 2.6% in placebo) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases (mean changes of 23.7% for 80 mg and 6.8% for 50 mg vs. -1.5% in placebo). Pruritus (mild-moderate) occurred in 16% (50 mg) and 40% (80 mg) of MET409-treated patients. CONCLUSION: MET409 lowered LFC over 12 weeks in patients with NASH and delivered a differentiated pruritus and LDL-C profile at 50 mg, providing the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced through structural optimization. LAY SUMMARY: Activation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a clinically validated approach for treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), although side effects such as itching or increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are frequently dose-limiting. MET409, an FXR agonist with a unique chemical structure, led to significant liver fat reduction and delivered a favorable side effect profile after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with NASH. These results provide the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced.

Effect of Topical Analgesia on Desensitization Following 8% Topical Capsaicin Application.

To prevent pain associated with 8% capsaicin application, pretreatment with local anesthetics, such as EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%), is considered an option. However, there is contradicting evidence regarding the effects of local analgesia on capsaicin-induced desensitization. In session 1, 2 skin areas in each forearm of 24 healthy volunteers were randomized to 2-hour pretreatment with EMLA/placebo cream. After pretreatment, 8% capsaicin patches were applied for 3 hours in 1 placebo and 1 EMLA pretreated area, obtaining the following four areas: Capsaicin + EMLA, Capsaicin + Placebo, EMLA alone, and Placebo. Pain intensity scores were assessed during the 3-hour application of capsaicin. Warmth detection, heat pain sensitivity, and microvascular reactivity were measured after the removal of capsaicin. After 24 hours, in session 2, all tests were repeated followed by histamine application in each area to examine itch intensity and neurogenic flare. Overall, EMLA caused significant reductions in capsaicin-induced pain compared with placebo (P= .007) and enhanced the capsaicin-induced increase in superficial blood perfusion immediately after the 3-hour capsaicin application (P< .01). Regardless of pretreatment, capsaicin induced heat hyperalgesia immediately after the application (P< .001). Twenty-four hours post application, heat pain sensitivity was normalized. However, WDT increased significantly (P< .001). Capsaicin tended to reduce the itch intensity and significantly reduced the neurogenic flare (P< .05) induced by histamine compared with EMLA alone. The findings suggest that pretreatment with topical analgesic cream reduces application site pain without interfering with the 8% topical capsaicin-induced desensitization. PERSPECTIVE: Pretreatment with local anesthetic EMLA cream might be considered a good therapeutic option to reduce the pain associated with 8% capsaicin application currently used for treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes. This study also suggests the existence of a synergistic effect of capsaicin and EMLA on the process of neurogenic inflammation.

Pooled Results of Two Randomized Phase III Trials Evaluating VP-102, a Drug-Device Combination Product Containing Cantharidin 0.7% (w/v) for the Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum.

BACKGROUND: Compounded cantharidin has been used for decades to treat molluscum contagiosum but lacks rigorous clinical evidence to support its safety and efficacy. VP-102 is a shelf-stable drug-device combination product that contains topical cantharidin (0.7% weight/volume [w/v]) and is being evaluated for the treatment of molluscum. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to present pooled safety and efficacy analyses of VP-102 in the treatment of molluscum compared with vehicle. METHODS: Participants aged ≥ 2 years were randomized 3:2 to topical administration of VP-102 or vehicle in two randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase III trials. Study drug was applied to all baseline and new lesions once every 21 days until clear or for a maximum of four applications. Assessors blinded to treatment counted all lesions at each study visit. All adverse events (AEs) were documented. Data were pooled for analyses. RESULTS: In total, 310 participants received VP-102 and 218 received vehicle. Mean age was 7.5 years (range 2-60) for VP-102 and 6.8 (2-54) for vehicle. Complete clearance of all molluscum lesions at day 84 occurred in 50% of VP-102 participants and 15.6% of vehicle recipients (p < 0.0001). Mean molluscum lesion counts decreased 76% for VP-102 and 0.3% for vehicle at day 84 (p < 0.0001). The most common AEs in the VP-102 group were application site blistering, pruritus, pain, and erythema, which were generally mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled analyses showed a significantly higher percentage of participants with complete molluscum lesion clearance and larger reductions in lesion counts with VP-102 than with vehicle. AEs were anticipated because of the pharmacodynamic properties of cantharidin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03377790 (first posted 19 December 2017) and NCT03377803 (first posted 19 December 2017). Video abstract: Pooled Results of Two Randomized Phase III Trials Evaluating VP 102, a Drug Device Combination Product Containing Cantharidin 0.7% (w/v) for the Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum (MP4 131293 KB).

Medications for the prevention of pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery with Intrathecal morphine: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus can cause significant discomfort in parturients and is refractory to conventional antipruritic treatment. This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of the medications used for prevention of intrathecal (IT) morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A literature search was conducted from 1946 up to October 2019. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared medications used for prevention of pruritus with a control group in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with IT morphine. The primary outcome examined was the incidence of pruritus up to 24 h after cesarean delivery. Dichotomous data were extracted and summarized using odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) with Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis model. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate quality of the studies and effect evidence. RESULTS: Of the 26 studies included in the systematic review, 21 studies with a total of 2594 patients were included in the network meta-analysis [prophylaxis, n = 1603 (62%) vs. control, n = 991 (38%)]. These studies investigated seven classes of drugs including serotonin-receptor antagonists, dopamine-receptor antagonists, opioid agonist-antagonists, opioid-receptor antagonists, histamine-receptor antagonists, propofol and celecoxib. The network meta-analysis showed that serotonin-receptor antagonists' prophylaxis [control vs. prophylaxis: 60% vs. 47%; OR (95% CrI): 2.69 (1.43-5.36)] and opioid agonist-antagonists prophylaxis [control vs. prophylaxis: 72% vs. 47%; OR (95% CrI): 4.57 (1.67-12.91)] decreased the incidence of pruritus compared to the control group. Although all included studies were at low risk of bias, the quality of the overall network meta-analysis pooled estimates was low. CONCLUSION: This bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates serotonin-receptor antagonists and opioid agonist-antagonists may prevent pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine compared to control group. However, further RCTs of adequate power and clearly defined end points are warranted.