Peritoneal Spread of Low-grade Appendiceal Tumours - 2 Days of Early Postoperative Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy Are Enough.

BACKGROUND/AIM: While controversial, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early postoperative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) remains the mainstay of treatment for low grade appendiceal neoplasm with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Our study aimed to investigate the difference in survival when administering HIPEC alone vs. HIPEC + EPIC. Additionally, we examined whether the duration of EPIC affects survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the difference in survival in 238 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC alone vs. CRS + HIPEC/EPIC combination for low grade appendiceal cancer. We also compared short course (1-2 days) vs. long course (3-5 days) of EPIC. RESULTS: HIPEC/EPIC combination group (n=179) showed a significantly better 5-year survival of 95% compared to 71% in HIPEC alone (n=59). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival between short course (n=22) and long course of EPIC (n=157). CONCLUSION: Combined use of HIPEC and EPIC improves 5-year survival in low-grade appendiceal neoplasm. Two days of EPIC are sufficient.

Complete Cytoreductive Surgery vs. Debulking Surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin: A propensity score-matched study based on a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the prognostic predictors and compare the long-term outcomes of complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) vs. debulking surgery (DS) in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) of appendiceal origin. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1008 consecutive patients with PMP undergoing primary surgery from January 2008 to December 2019 was performed. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (1:1) was performed, and oncologic outcomes were compared between the CCRS and DS groups. RESULTS: Out of 1008 patients, 258 patients were excluded. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between the CCRS and DS groups (total n = 750). After PSM, 106 patients were selected from each group and the baseline characteristics were matched between groups. There were significant differences between groups in operative time, the incidence of major complications (P = 0.017), and the numbers of organs removed. The median follow-up was 28 (1-131) months. Median overall survival (OS) for the 212 patients was 52.0 months (95% CI 40.2-63.8), and 10-year OS was 39.0%. Median OS could not be calculated for the CCRS group; in the DS group, this value was 41 months (P = 0.010). The 10-year OS rate was 54.2% in the CCRS group and 31.2% in the DS group. Multivariate analyses identified CCRS (P = 0.012) and histopathologic subtype (P < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this matched-pair analysis of patients with appendiceal PMP, CCRS was safe and associated with better prognosis than DS. The completeness of cytoreduction and histopathologic subtype were two independent prognostic factors for OS.

Peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: History, clinical applications, and implementation.

MR imaging provides considerable advantages in the evaluation of patients with peritoneal metastases. A standardized peritoneal MRI protocol, including diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced sequences, allows an efficient exploration of small peritoneal tumors that are often missed on other imaging tests. In experienced hands, a dedicated reading allows producing a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of lesional localization to better assist surgeons in the selection of candidates for curative surgery by evaluating the possibility of complete resection, and to plan the surgical procedure. Based on a close collaboration between oncologic surgeon and radiologist, MRI provides a powerful tool for accurate preoperative imaging in patients being considered for curative surgery but also in their surveillance to detect an early recurrence.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendix neoplasms with peritoneal metastases: A propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: - Early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) can be used after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with resectable peritoneal metastases (PM). Whether EPIC adds any benefit is debatable. METHODS: - We performed a retrospective case-control analysis of patients with PM of appendiceal origin treated by CRS + HIPEC ± EPIC at Uppsala University Hospital between 2004 and 2012. The 206 patients were divided into two groups depending on if they received EPIC or not. The two groups were propensity-matched with a 1:1 ratio. The patients in the EPIC group were mostly operated in the first three years of the unit's experience. RESULTS: - After matching, 76 patients were left in each group. The groups were similar, except for the proportion of histological subtypes (p = 0.021) and chemotherapy agents used for HIPEC (0.017). Survival outcomes were stratified by histology. The patients who received EPIC had a longer hospital and ICU length of stay (15.71 vs 14.28 days, p = 0.049), (1.45 vs 1.05 days, p = 0.002), respectively. Post-operative complications were similar in both groups. Overall Survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ for the patients with low-grade histology. The patients with high-grade tumors who received EPIC had a significantly worse OS (p = 0.0088) while having the same RFS as the patients who did not receive EPIC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest there is no benefit of EPIC in patients with advanced appendiceal tumors while increasing hospital and ICU length of stays. A suboptimal group matching might influence our results.

Mode of Presentation in 1070 Patients With Perforated Epithelial Appendiceal Tumors, Predominantly with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

BACKGROUND: Perforated epithelial appendiceal tumors are uncommon and can give rise to pseudomyxoma peritonei. Pseudomyxoma peritonei is rare, almost always of appendiceal origin, and presents in various ways relevant to abdominal surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the mode of presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin in patients treated in a high-volume UK peritoneal malignancy center. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study was conducted. SETTINGS: This was a single-center study. PATIENTS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing surgery between March 1994 and December 2016 was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of presentation was classified into 7 categories: "histological diagnosis at abdominal surgery for presumed appendicitis," "probable pseudomyxoma peritonei" based on abnormality on cross-sectional imaging (± image-guided biopsy)," "abnormal imaging (other cause suspected) and operative finding of pseudomyxoma peritonei," "diagnostic laparoscopy," "ovarian mass," "new-onset hernia," and "miscellaneous." RESULTS: Overall, 1070 patients underwent surgery (female 61%, male 39%); median age was 57. The mode of presentation was abnormality on cross-sectional imaging in 324 of 1070 patients (30.3%), histological diagnosis at emergency surgery for presumed appendicitis in 203 of 1070 patients (19%), and abnormal imaging with eventual pseudomyxoma peritonei diagnosis in 180 of 1070 patients (16.8%); 124 of 651 women (19.2%) presented with an ovarian mass. New-onset hernia was the presenting feature in 9.9%; 83 of 1070 patients (7.7%) were diagnosed at diagnostic laparoscopy, and 32 of 1070 patients (3%) were described as "miscellaneous." Overall, 775 of 1070 patients (72.4%) had complete cytoreductive surgery with 10-year survival of 63.5%. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study, radiological improvements over the study period, and the number of patients who had overlapping features at presentation. CONCLUSION: Perforated appendiceal tumors present in various ways but predominantly at cross-sectional imaging or coincidentally at laparoscopy or laparotomy. All abdominal surgeons will occasionally encounter cases, often unexpectedly, and recognition and referral to a specialized unit results in excellent outcomes in most cases. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B256. MODO DE PRESENTACIÓN EN 1070 PACIENTES CON TUMORES EPITELIALES APENDICULARES PERFORADOS, PREDOMINANTEMENTE CON PSEUDOMIXOMA PERITONEAL: Los tumores epiteliales apendiculares perforados son poco frecuentes y pueden dar lugar a Pseudomyxoma peritonei. El pseudomixoma peritoneal es raro, casi siempre de origen apendicular, y se presenta de diversas formas relevantes para los cirujanos abdominales.El objetivo fue informar el modo de presentación del Pseudomixoma peritoneal de origen apendicular en pacientes tratados en un centro de malignidad peritoneal de alto volumen en el Reino Unido.Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo.Este fue un estudio de centro único.Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva de pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía entre marzo de 1994 y diciembre de 2016.El modo de presentación se clasificó en 7 categorías: "diagnóstico histológico en la cirugía abdominal por presunta apendicitis", "probable Pseudomixoma peritoneal" basado en la anormalidad en la imagen de corte transversal (biopsia guiada por imagen +/-), "imagen anormal (se sospecha otra causa) y hallazgo quirúrgico de Pseudomixoma peritoneal", "laparoscopia diagnostica", "masa ovarica", "hernia de reciente aparicion" y "varios".En total, 1070 pacientes fueron operados (mujeres 61%, hombres 39%); edad media 57. El modo de presentación fue anormalidad en la imágen transversal en 324/1070 (30.3%), el diagnóstico histológico en cirugía de emergencia por presunta apendicitis en 203/1070 (19%), la imágen anormal con eventual diagnóstico de Pseudomixoma peritoneal en 180 / 1070 (16.8%), 124/651 (19.2%) las mujeres presentaron una masa ovárica. La hernia de reciente aparición fue la característica de presentación en 9.9%, 83/1070 (7.7%) fueron diagnosticados por laparoscopia diagnóstica y 32/1070 (3%) "misceláneos". En general, 775/1070 (72,4%) se sometió a cirugía citorreductora completa con una supervivencia a 10 años del 63,5%.Una deficiencia es que los resultados están limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio, las mejoras radiológicas a lo largo del período de estudio, y varios pacientes tenían características superpuestas en la presentación.Los tumores apendiculares perforados se presentan de varias maneras, pero predominantemente en imágenes transversales o casualmente en laparoscopia o laparotomía. Todos los cirujanos abdominales encontrarán ocasionalmente con casos, a menudo inesperados, y el reconocimiento y la derivación a una unidad especializada da lugar a excelentes resultados en la mayoría de los casos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B256.).

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin: result of a single centre study.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare condition characterized by the intraperitoneal accumulation of mucus derived mostly by appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can offer a favourable overall survival. In this study, we report a single-institute outcomes following CRS and HIPEC in patients with this condition. This is a review of prospectively collected data from 32 patients (11 men and 21 women) affected by PMP of appendiceal origin who underwent CRS and HIPEC from 2008 to 2016 in our Surgical Unit of General and Esophagogastric Surgery. The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 25-77 years). After CRS, all patients underwent HIPEC (mytomicin C 3.3 mg/m2/L and cisplatin 25 mg/m2/L at 41 °C for 60 min) with closed abdomen technique. The median (range) follow-up time for surviving patients was 43 (18-119) months. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 17. Complete cytoreductive surgery (CC0) was achieved in in 22 patients (69%). The majority of patients (88%) had grade I-II complications, 3 (9%) had grade III complications, and 1 (3%) patient had a grade IV complication. There were no perioperative mortalities. The median hospital stay was 9.5 (range 9-24) days. One year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 90% and 58%, respectively. Regardless of histotype, disease-free survival was 95% at 1 year and 46% at 5 years. CRS in combination with HIPEC is a feasible treatment strategy and can achieve a satisfactory outcome in patients with PMP of appendiceal origin.