[Evaluation of the perspectives and experiences regarding lumbar puncture in cognitively impaired older adults over 70, their relatives and the care teams]. / Évaluation des représentations et du vécu liés à la ponction lombaire chez des patients âgés de plus de 70 ans atteints de troubles cognitifs, leurs accompagnants et les équipes soignantes.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an essential diagnostic procedure, which raises major concerns in older adults. Some patients may be denied LP because of the fear of complications in healthcare teams which are not familiar with the procedure. The objectives of our work were to analyze the perspectives and the experiences regarding scheduled LP in cognitively impaired older adults, as well as in their relatives, and the healthcare teams from geriatric day hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, observational and multicentric study, based on semi-directive interviews of patients aged over 70 years with cognitive complaints undergoing a scheduled LP in a day hospital. Patients were interviewed before and after LP. Their relatives and the involved healthcare teams were also interviewed to analyze their expectations and perspectives regarding the procedure. The full interviews were transcribed and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age 80.2 ± 7.2), five relatives and four healthcare teams were included. The goals and operating procedure of LP were poorly understood by several patients. Some individuals feared irreversible neurological consequences or LP-related pain, which was often overestimated with regards to the post-LP interviews. The patients' major expectation was to establish an accurate and early diagnosis of their cognitive disorder to provide optimal care plan. Relatives reported similar fears of major adverse events. They also expected an accurate diagnosis with biomarkers. The perspectives and experiences of the healthcare teams were heterogeneous, according to their level of practice of LP, but seemed in line with current scientific guidelines. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the existence of false beliefs and poor knowledge regarding the LP procedure and its associated risks. The post-LP patients' feedbacks were better than their expectations, especially in day hospitals with solid experience in LP. Better patient information may be a key to improve our practice.

Lumbar Puncture-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Patients, Caregivers, Doctors, and Nurses in Zambia.

Lumbar puncture (LP) is underused for neuroinfectious disease diagnosis in Zambia, but reasons for poor uptake remain speculative. This cross-sectional study assessed LP knowledge, attitudes, and practices among patients/caregivers and healthcare workers (HCWs) and predictors of LP completion. Patients with suspected central nervous system infection, caregivers, and HCWs at the University Teaching Hospitals in 2016 were eligible. Questions adapted from the existing literature were used for a LP knowledge score. Predictors of knowledge scores were assessed independently for patients/caregivers and HCWs. Predictors of LP completion were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Among 123 patients/caregivers, LP knowledge was poor. Pediatric caregivers were more likely than adult patients/caregivers to report LP could be replaced by neuroimaging (90% versus 78%, P < 0.001) and cause paralysis (57% versus 39%, P = 0.01). There were no significant predictors of the knowledge score among patients/caregivers. Among HCWs, 28% said LP makes patients clinically worse, and 60% reported it could cause paralysis. The increased knowledge score was associated with greater wealth (P = 0.03) and personally knowing someone who underwent LP (P < 0.001). Lumbar puncture was completed on 67/112 (57%) patients and was associated with an increased knowledge score (OR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.19-2.23]). Pediatric patients (OR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07-0.47]) and those with a fear of paralysis (OR 0.29 [95% CI: 0.11-0.77]) were less likely to undergo LP. Improving LP-related knowledge may improve uptake. Healthcare workers sense of LP risk may also play a role in encouraging/discouraging use.

Role of routine use of ultrasonographic guidance for performing lumbar punctures.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: Ultrasound (US) for lumbar puncture has seen the most success in obese patients and in patients with difficult to palpate landmarks. We aimed to elucidate the advantage of the use of routine US for performing lumbar punctures over the traditional landmark method. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study with consecutive sampling with a sample size of convenience. Three residents were chosen to perform the lumbar punctures after a training session. Patients were assigned to either the US group or the landmark group. The outcomes studied were number of attempts at needle insertion, patient and physician anxiety, pain experienced, time to procedure, number of traumatic attempts and the difficulties faced during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in this study, of which 36 patients (46.8%) underwent landmark-based lumbar puncture and 41 (53.2%) underwent US-guided lumbar puncture. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups among the following characteristics: number of attempts to a successful procedure, number of traumatic punctures, procedure time, preprocedure anxiety of the participants and physicians and pain score rating of the procedure. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the landmark method and US-guided method for performing lumbar puncture in the number of successful attempts, number of traumatic punctures, procedure time and pain during the procedure. Further studies are required to elucidate the advantage of the use of ultrasonography in subsets of the population such as the low body mass index population.

Factors Associated with Lumbar Puncture Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides insight into the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. While lumbar punctures (LPs) for CSF collection are generally considered safe procedures, many participants remain hesitant to participate in research involving LPs. OBJECTIVE: To explore factors associated with participant willingness to undergo a research LP at baseline and follow-up research study visit. METHODS: We analyzed data from 700 participants with varying cognition (unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia) in the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. We evaluated the relationship of demographic variables (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and years of education) and clinical variables (waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, AD parental history, cognitive diagnosis) on decision to undergo baseline LP1. We evaluated the relationship of prior LP1 experience (procedure success and adverse events) with the decision to undergo follow-up LP2. The strongest predictors were incorporated into regression models. RESULTS: Over half of eligible participants opted into both baseline and follow-up LP. Participants who underwent LP1 had higher mean education than those who declined (p = 0.020). White participants were more likely to choose to undergo LP1 (p < 0.001); 33% of African American participants opted in compared to 65% of white participants. Controlling for age, education, and AD parental history, race was the only significant predictor for LP1 participation. Controlling for LP1 mild adverse events, successful LP1 predicted LP2 participation. CONCLUSION: Race was the most important predictor of baseline LP participation, and successful prior LP was the most important predictor of follow-up LP participation.

Medical students' attitudes toward lumbar puncture-And how to change.

OBJECTIVE: To survey medical students on the lumbar puncture (LP) procedure in terms of their existing knowledge, practical experience and attitudes, and to determine whether the completion of a single standardized seminar that includes practical training on phantoms can alter these parameters. METHODS: The survey was completed by medical students undertaking the curricular neurology course. Students were asked to describe their practical experience in different bedside procedures, and document how they perceive LP in terms of their own knowledge, confidence and attitude. Students then participated in a newly designed 90-min seminar that included practical training on phantoms and placed special emphasis both on the patients' point of view during the procedure and the benefits of an atraumatic approach. All students who completed the seminar were required to complete the survey for a second time. RESULTS: Among the 153 participants, LP was associated with the lowest baseline levels of experience and confidence compared to other bedside procedures. Attitudes, knowledge, and confidence related to the various aspects of LP all showed significant improvement after the seminar. CONCLUSION: A single standardized LP seminar with simulation training alters medical students' attitudes toward LP through improving their level of knowledge and confidence. This may have important implications in doctors-to-be on their stance toward LP and resultant advice to future patients regarding this important procedure.

Physicians' and Nurses' Perspectives on the Decision to Perform Lumbar Punctures on Febrile Infants ≤8 Weeks Old.

OBJECTIVES: There is wide variation in the decision of whether to perform lumbar punctures (LPs) on well-appearing febrile infants ≤8 weeks old. Our objectives were to identify factors that influence that decision and the barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making about LP with parents of febrile infants. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 pediatric and general emergency medicine physicians and 8 pediatric emergency medicine nurses at an urban, academic medical center. Through interviews, we assessed physicians' practices and physicians' and nurses' perspectives about communication and decision-making with parents of febrile infants. Two researchers independently reviewed the transcripts, coded the data using the constant comparative method, and identified themes. RESULTS: Five themes emerged for factors that influence physicians' decisions about whether to perform an LP: (1) the age of the infant; (2) the physician's clinical experience; (3) the physician's use of research findings; (4) the physician's values, particularly risk aversion; and (5) the role of the primary care pediatrician. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making identified by physicians and by nurses included factors related to their perceptions of parents' understanding and acceptance of risks, parents' emotions, physicians' assessment of whether there is clinical equipoise, and availability of follow-up with the primary care pediatrician. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in physicians' values, use of research findings, and clinical experience likely contribute to decisions of whether to perform an LP on well-appearing febrile infants. Incorporation of parents' preferences through shared decision-making may be indicated, although there are barriers that would need to be overcome.

Psychosocial interventions for reduction of distress in children with leukemia during bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture.

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer undergo many invasive medical procedures that are often painful and highly distressing, including bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and lumbar puncture (LP). Psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated to reduce children's distress resulting from invasive medical procedures. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of psychosocial interventions to reduce distress in children with cancer undergoing BMA and LP in a pediatric cancer center in Taiwan. METHODS: Children with cancer who received treatment between March 2015 and December 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan were eligible for the study. The psychosocial intervention comprised preparation and cognitive behavioral intervention and was provided by a certified child life specialist. The assessment instrument was the revised version of the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD-R). The behavioral distress of patients who underwent psychosocial interventions for BMA and LP was compared with patients without interventions. We also analyzed the difference of behavioral distress in patients' pre- and post-psychosocial intervention for BMA and LP. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled into this study. The mean age of diagnosis of leukemia was 6.6 years old (range: 3-11 years). Fifteen patients were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. The mean of OSBD-R total scores in 7 patients with psychosocial intervention was significantly lower than the mean score in 6 patients without intervention (0.65 vs. 4.81, p = 0.002). Pre- and post-psychosocial intervention for BMA and LP behavioral distress were evaluated for the remaining 5 patients. Consistently, there was a significant reduction of the OSBD-R score following interventions (3.04 vs. 7.81, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions provided by a certified child life specialist have a significant potential to reduce children's distress during BMA and LP in pediatric healthcare settings in Taiwan.

Characterising the patient experience of diagnostic lumbar puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a cross-sectional online survey.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) usually require multiple lumbar punctures (LPs) during the course of their disease, and often report significant morbidity associated with the procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the patient's experience of diagnostic LP in IIH. DESIGN, METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of patients with IIH was conducted using an anonymous online survey, with the questions designed in collaboration with IIH UK (the UK IIH charity). Responses were collated over a 2-month period from April to May 2015. Patients were asked to quantify responses using a Verbal Rating Score (VRS) 0-10 with 0 being the minimum and 10 the maximum score. RESULTS: 502 patients responded to the survey, of which 463 were analysed for this study. 40% of patients described severe pain during the LP (VRS ≥8), and the median pain score during the LP was 7 (VRS, IQR 5-7). The majority of patients felt they received insufficient pain relief (85%). Levels of anxiety about future LPs were high (median VRS 7, IQR 4-10), with 47% being extremely anxious (VRS ≥8). LPs performed as an emergency were associated with significantly greater pain scores compared with elective procedures (median 7, IQR 5-7 vs 6, IQR 4-8, p=0.012). 10.7% went on to have an X-ray-guided procedure due to failure of the initial LP, and the body mass index was significantly higher in this group (mean kg/m240.3 vs 35.5, p=0.001). Higher LP pain scores (VRS) were significantly associated with poorly informed patients (Spearman's correlation, r=-0.32, p<0.001). Patients felt more informed when the LP was performed by a specialist registrar compared with a junior doctor (median 7 vs 5, p=0.001) or a consultant compared with a junior doctor (median 8 vs 5, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study was commissioned by the IIH patient group and is the first to document the patient experience of diagnostic LPs in IIH. It shows that the majority of these patients are experiencing significant morbidity from pain and anxiety. Patient experience of LP may be improved through changing clinical practice to include universal detailed preprocedural information, and where possible, avoiding emergency LPs in favour of LPs booked on an elective day-case unit.

Opinion and Special Articles: Stress when performing the first lumbar puncture may compromise patient safety.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify physician stress levels when performing lumbar puncture (LP) and explore operator stress effect on patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Novices, intermediates, and experts in performing LP were recruited from 4 departments of neurology and emergency medicine. Stress was measured before and during performance of the LP using cognitive appraisal (CA), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Short (STAI-S) questionnaire, and the heart rate variability measure low frequency/high frequency index (LF/HF ratio). Patient-related outcomes were pain, confidence in the operator, and postdural puncture headache (PDPH). RESULTS: Forty-six physicians were included in the study: 22 novices, 12 intermediates, and 12 experts. Novices had the highest stress level and experts the lowest measured by cognitive appraisal and STAI-S before and during LP performance (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Novices had the highest sympathetic tonus indicated by the highest LF/HF ratio before (p = 0.004) and during (p = 0.056) LP performance. Physician stress level was not significantly related to patients' pain. However, there was a significant relationship between STAI-S during the procedure and patient confidence in the operator (regression coefficient = -0.034, p = 0.008). High physician heart rate during the procedure significantly increased the odds of PDPH (odds ratio = 1.17, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Novice stress levels were high before and during performance of LP. Stress was significantly related to patient confidence in the operator and risk of PDPH. Simulation-based training should be considered to reduce novice residents' stress levels and increase patient safety.

Factors Influencing Successful Lumbar Puncture in Alzheimer Research.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar puncture (LP) is increasingly common in Alzheimer disease research; however, agreement to undergo LP varies. We sought to determine factors influencing LP consent at Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADCs) in the United States. METHODS: A 3-part survey was distributed to each ADC: (1) ADC LP Experience; (2) LP Requestor Experience; and (3) Patient LP Experience (both Initial and Follow-up). In all, 64 LP Requestor, 579 Patient/Initial, and 404 Patient/Follow-up surveys were collected. Logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations were used to assess factors associated with LP agreement and post-LP complications. RESULTS: Asians and those viewing LP negatively were less likely to agree to LP. Three hundred fifty-two participants had an LP; LP headache occurred in 11.9% (blood patch required in 1.4%) and 9.9% reported other complications. Younger individuals, women, those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, use of a Quincke needle, ≤20 mL cerebrospinal fluid drawn, and hemorrhage during LP were associated with LP headache. Use of gravity flow during LP was associated with fewer other complications (nausea, dizziness, vasovagal response, back pain, neck stiffness, and/or nerve root pain). CONCLUSIONS: LP in Alzheimer disease research is generally safe and well tolerated. Factors influencing LP agreement potentially could be studied to advance participant acceptance of the procedure.

Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture in Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is one of the essential diagnostic tools in pediatric emergency services. Recently, ultrasound-assisted LP was reported to be beneficial in the emergency service by facilitating the procedure and improving the successful procedure rates. In addition, this method may be effective in reducing patient and parent anxiety due to the LP procedure. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ultrasound-assisted LP on the outcomes of puncture procedures and traumatic LP. METHODS: The study included patients younger than 18 years, who were admitted to the pediatric emergency service and underwent LP because of suspected central nervous system infection. The patients requiring LP were randomly divided into 2 groups designated as odd and even. One group received LP using the conventional method, whereas the other group had LP after spinal space measurement by ultrasound. The patients who did and who did not undergo ultrasound-assisted LP were compared for demographics, number of puncture attempts, and traumatic LP. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Student t test. The χ test was used when nominal data were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Ultrasound-assisted LP was performed in 56 patients, and LP by using conventional method was performed in 55 patients. There was traumatic LP in 5 (8.9%) of the patients who underwent ultrasound-assisted LP and 9 (16.3%) of the patients who underwent LP using the conventional method (P > 0.05). The number of puncture attempts was 2 or more in 2 (3.5%) of the patients who underwent ultrasound-assisted LP and 5 (9%) of the patients who had LP using the conventional method (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-assisted LP reduced traumatic LP and the number of puncture attempts in pediatric patients; however, the results were not statistically significant.

Experience and nursing needs of school-age children undergoing lumbar puncture during the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a descriptive and qualitative study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe experiences and nursing needs of school-age Chinese children undergoing lumbar puncture for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture is an invasive procedure, causing psychological changes and physical discomfort in patients. In a previous study, it was proved that distraction intervention, such as music therapy, relieves pain and anxiety. There is limited evidence regarding the experience and needs of school-age children during lumbar puncture after being diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. To minimise their anxiety and pain during the procedure, it is important to collect information directly from these children. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative research. METHODS: Twenty-one school-age children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia participated in semi-structured interviews at a Children's Hospital in China. Data were collected by an experienced and trained interviewer. Qualitative content analysis was chosen to describe experiences of children undergoing lumbar puncture. RESULTS: While undergoing lumbar puncture for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, school-age Chinese children experienced complex psychological feelings (fear, tension, helplessness, sadness and anxiety). They also experienced physical discomfort. They had multipolar needs, such as information, communication, respect, self-actualisation, environment and equipment. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified important areas that must be closely monitored by healthcare staff, performing lumbar puncture on acute lymphoblastic leukaemia children. Thus, a successful and smooth procedure can be performed on these patients, and their quality of life can be improved. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The experiences described in this study contribute to a better understanding of the needs of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia children undergoing lumbar puncture. They also provide valuable information to professional medical care staff that develops future nursing assessments.

Fixed 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen to reduce lumbar-puncture-induced pain: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lumbar puncture (LP) has been frequently performed for more than a century. This procedure is still stressful and often painful. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed 50% nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture compared to placebo to reduce immediate procedural pain and anxiety during LP. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving adults who needed a cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to inhale either a fixed 50% nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture (50% N2 O-O2 ) or medical air (22% O2 -78% N2 ). Cutaneous application of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics was systematically done and all LPs were performed with pencil point 25G needles (20G introducer needle). The primary end-point was the maximal pain level felt by the patient during the procedure, the maximal anxiety level being a secondary outcome, both measured using a numerical rating scale (0-10). RESULTS: A total of 66 consecutive patients were randomized. The analysis was intention to treat. The maximal pain was 4.9 ± 2.7 for the 33 patients receiving air and 2.7 ± 2.7 for the 33 receiving 50% N2 O-O2 (P = 0.002). Similarly, the maximal LP-induced anxiety was 4.5 ± 3.1 vs. 2.6 ± 2.6 (P = 0.009), respectively. The number needed to treat to avoid one patient undergoing significant pain (pain score ≥ 4/10) was 2.75. Body mass index >25 kg/m2 was significantly associated with higher pain intensity (P = 0.03). No serious adverse events were attributable to 50% N2 O-O2 inhalation. CONCLUSIONS: Inhalation of a fixed 50% N2 O-O2 mixture is efficient to reduce LP-induced pain and anxiety.

Risk factors for post lumbar puncture headache.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is complicated by headache in about one-third of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate potential risk factors for post-LP headache. METHODS: 144 Patients undergoing diagnostic LP at a tertiary medical center completed questionnaires on fear of the procedure, pre-existing headache, and post-LP headache. Data on patient demographics, operator experience, and other procedure-related parameters were collected from hospital files. RESULTS: The post-LP headache group (n=37, 27.6%) was characterized by a significantly younger age and higher proportion of women relative to the no-headache group (n=97); body mass index was similar. Both groups had similar levels of fear of the procedure and there was no correlation between intensity of patients' anxiety to the procedure and its occurrence. Patients with high opening pressure had higher levels of post-LP headache (28.6% vs. 18% p=0.078) and a history of headaches was significantly more prevalent in the post-LP-headache group (66.6% vs. 38.1%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Fear of the procedure does not predispose to occurrence of post-LP headache while a history of headache and elevated intracranial pressure does. These findings may be related to the possible pathophysiology of the condition, namely a change in compliance and pressure gradients with resultant venous distention.

Lumbar puncture preferences among Swedish neurologists.

Lumbar puncture (LP) with cerebrospinal fluid analysis is a common diagnostic tool in neurology, and may be complicated by post-LP headache (PLPHA). The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has published guidelines for performing diagnostic LPs with the aim to reduce PLPHA risk, but our clinical hands-on experience suggests that these are not followed. We performed a questionnaire study among Swedish neurologists to investigate the acceptance and implementation of the AAN guidelines. Only one-eighth (22/174) of the respondents performed their LPs according to the AAN guidelines. The poor adherence to the AAN guidelines among Swedish neurologists may be due to perceived low credibility, as the current guidelines cite only one study to support the recommendation to use atraumatic needles, and only one study to support the recommendation to replace the stylet before needle withdrawal. An international survey has been posted ( https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/lumbarpuncturesurvey ) to investigate whether the results of this Swedish questionnaire are representative of neurologists worldwide.

Cognitive functions after spinal tap in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is characterised by gait disturbance, urinary incontinence and dementia. Even though dementia is a cardinal symptom of NPH, there is few data available concerning cognitive functioning. The aim of this observational case-control study was to evaluate the use of neuropsychological (NPSY) tests prior and after spinal tap test, which might be helpful for diagnosis, treatment and as a prognostic factor for shunt surgery. 15 patients with NPH and 18 controls were examined with eleven different tests covering all neuropsychological domains on two consecutive days. The second examination in NPH patients was 1 day after a spinal tap of 30-50 ml cerebrospinal fluid. A significant difference between NPH and controls in the change between baseline and 1 day after spinal tap was only observed in MMSE. In the domains of visuo-constructive function and attention, controls performed slightly better at day one compared to baseline, which could be interpreted as a learning effect, but after adjusting for multiple testing none of the P values were significant. In contrast to other reports, the MMSE seems to provide a sensitive evaluation of the response to spinal tap in NPH patients and might therefore be included into the routine work up of NPH patients. All other NPSY tests showed less prominent changes within 1 day after spinal tap.