Brazil-TNT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by FOLFIRINOX Versus Chemoradiation for Stage II/III Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiation and oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy (total neoadjuvant therapy-TNT) have been shown to increase response and organ-preservation rates in localized rectal cancer. However, trials have been heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols and few have used a watch-and-wait (WW) approach for complete responders. This trial evaluates if conventional long-term chemoradiation followed by consolidation of FOLFIRINOX increases complete response rates and the number of patients managed by WW. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized phase II trial conducted in 2 Cancer Centers in Brazil that included patients with T3+ or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma. After completing a long-course 54 Gy chemoradiation with capecitabine patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85, irinotecan 150, 5-FU 2400)-TNT-arm-or to the control arm, that did not include further neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were re-staged with dedicated pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and sigmoidoscopy 12 weeks after the end of radiation. Patients with a clinical complete response were followed using a WW protocol. The primary endpoint was complete response: clinical complete response (cCR) or pathological response (pCR). RESULTS: Between April 2021 and June 2023, 55 patients were randomized to TNT and 53 to the control arm. Tumors were 74% stage 3, median distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 63% had an at-risk circumferential margin, and 33% an involved sphincter. The rates of cCR + pCR were (31%) for TNT versus (17%) for controls (odds ratio 2.19, CI 95% 0.8-6.22 P = .091) and rates of WW were 16% and 9% (P = ns). Median follow-up was 8.1 months and recurrence rates were 16% versus 21% for TNT and controls (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: TNT with consolidation FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has high response rates, consistent with the current literature for TNT. This trial was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Government (PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81).

Do We Have to Treat All T3 Rectal Cancer the Same Way?

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is the recommended approach in the last years for stage II and III rectal cancer with the intention to decrease the risk of local recurrence. However, fewer patients benefit from this strategy in terms of overall survival and long-term adverse outcomes because T3 rectal cancer has a broad range of prognosis, as shown by recent publications. Many patients with cT3 rectal cancer have a substantial risk of overtreatment with long-term toxicity related to radiotherapy that could be avoided in a subset group of cT3 tumors with good prognosis. These findings raised the question of whether all cT3 rectal cancer should receive preoperative radiotherapy and if a selected cT3 subgroup could be treated by surgery alone. This review addresses the rationale of selecting good prognosis cT3 rectal cancer for surgery alone and analyzes the data to support this recommendation.

Utilization and Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Uterine Clear Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Because of the rarity of uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), a National Cancer Data Base analysis was conducted to evaluate practice patterns and implications of adjuvant therapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for UCCC patients diagnosed from 1998 to 2011. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, lacking surgical staging, or having follow-up time shorter than 6 months were excluded. Factors associated with utilization were assessed using logistic regression. To define the probability of receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT + RT), propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. Log-rank test and multivariable IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling were then conducted. RESULTS: A total of 2504 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 65.5 months. Most patients had FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I to II UCCC (71.4%). Adjuvant RT alone, CT alone, or CT + RT was given in 35.3%, 9.5%, and 11.7%, respectively. Among those receiving RT, external beam was the most common modality (69.4%). Later year of diagnosis (>2005: odds ratio [OR], 4.42; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.44-8.01), higher FIGO stage (IIIA-IIIC2: OR, 6.34; 95% CI, 3.93-10.24), larger tumor size (3.6-5.0 cm: OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.76-6.55), and lymph node dissection (OR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.60-11.15) were associated with a higher chance of receiving CT + RT. With IPTW-adjusted multivariable analysis, CT + RT significantly decreased mortality risk in stage III to IVA patients (hazards ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.77), trending toward benefit in stage I to II patients (hazards ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: In this hospital-based registry analysis of UCCC, adjuvant CT + RT significantly reduced the risk of death, reaching statistical significance for stage III to IVA patients.