Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Quizartinib Combination Therapy With Standard Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Two Phase 1 Trials in Japan and China.

Quizartinib is a potent, oral, second-generation, selective type II FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor. It has shown improved overall survival in a randomized, multinational, Phase 3 (QuANTUM-First) study in patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD)-positive newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. We conducted 2 Phase 1b studies in Japan and China to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of quizartinib in combination with standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Quizartinib was started at a dose level of 20 mg/day and then escalated to 40 mg/day, the dose used in the Phase 3 study. Seven patients were enrolled according to the 3 + 3 dose-escalation method in each study, including 3 patients who were FLT3-ITD positive. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at dose levels up to 40 mg/day in both studies. Grade 3 or higher, quizartinib-related, treatment-emergent adverse events included febrile neutropenia, hematologic toxicities, and infections. QT prolongation on electrocardiogram was observed in 5 patients. The pharmacokinetics of quizartinib and its metabolite AC886 were similar between the studies and consistent with previous findings in the United States. We confirmed the tolerability of Japanese and Chinese patients to the dose of quizartinib and chemotherapy regimens used in the QuANTUM-First study.

Role of Consolidation and Maintenance.

Consolidation therapy consists of short-term therapy after stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma. Key consolidation trials have shown mixed results on whether consolidation should be included after transplant, leading to varied clinical practice. Maintenance therapy consists of long-term, typically fixed-duration or indefinite, therapy. Standard-risk patients typically receive single-agent therapy, whereas high-risk may benefit from doublet therapy and beyond. Adverse events and quality of life concerns should be considered, as optimal duration of maintenance therapy continues to be studied.

Outpatient consolidation chemotherapy with intermediate dose cytarabine has similar survival and relapses rates in acute myeloid leukemia as compared to high dose cytarabine: A single center analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The last decade has seen advances in delivering outpatient consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The standard of care involves high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, given twice daily for three alternating days. At the London Regional Cancer Program, we have transitioned the administration of outpatient cytarabine to a once-daily regimen over six consecutive days. The outcomes of a longer duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is currently unknown. This study aims to assess the feasibility of administering a continuous 6-day protocol of high-dose (HDAC-16) and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-16) consolidation therapy in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review to analyze AML patients treated with outpatient high-dose or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program from January 1, 2019, through November 1, 2022. The primary objective was to determine the outcomes of the 6-day outpatient administration of once daily high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received 89 cycles of cytarabine as outpatients; males were 55.6% of the total population, with a median age of ~57 years. Our overall 2-year survival of HDAC-16 (57.1%) and IDAC-16 (83.3%) is consistent with the reported literature. There was no difference in delays, relapse rates, and nonrelapse mortality between both HDAC and IDAC groups. The 2-year relapse free survival was 57.1% for HDAC-16 and 66.7% for IDAC-16. CONCLUSION: Outpatient administration of intermediate-dose cytarabine once daily over six consecutive days results in similar overall survival and relapse rates as compared to high dose cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy. Moving to a once daily administration schedule can alleviate logistical and/or accessibility hurdles for outpatient oncology clinics. Prospective randomized trials are needed in this setting to validate our results.

ShorTrip Trial: A Prospective, Multicentric Phase II Single-Arm Trial of Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Intensified Consolidation Chemotherapy With the Triplet FOLFOXIRI as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy and surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly feasible and its benefit is questionable. In the last years, several total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) strategies, moving the adjuvant chemotherapy to the neoadjuvant setting, have been investigated with the aim of improving compliance to systemic chemotherapy, treating micrometastases earlier and then reducing distant recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ShorTrip (NTC05253846) is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase II trial where 63 patients with LARC will be treated with short-course radiotherapy followed by intensified consolidation chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI regimen and surgery. Primary endpoint is pCR. Among the first 11 patients who started consolidation chemotherapy, a preliminary safety analysis showed a high rate of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (N = 7, 64%) during the first cycle of FOLFOXIRI. Therefore, the protocol has been emended with the recommendation to omit irinotecan during the first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy. After amendment, in a subsequent safety analysis focused on the first 9 patients treated with FOLFOX as first cycle and then with FOLFOXIRI, grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was reported in only one case during the second cycle. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and activity of a TNT strategy including SCRT, intensified consolidation treatment with FOLFOXIRI and delayed surgery. After protocol amendment, the treatment seems feasible without safety concern. Results are expected at the end of 2024.

More than two courses of pre-transplant consolidation therapy benefits patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling allografts: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation (MSDT) for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China. In our study, we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 969 days, patients with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (85.6% vs . 67.0%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (89.2% vs . 78.5%, P  = 0.007), and better cumulative incidences of relapse (10.5% vs . 19.6%, P  = 0.020) and non-relapse mortality (4.2% vs . 14.9%, P  = 0.001) than those with ≤ 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy. Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS (85.9% vs . 67.7%, P  = 0.003) and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (9.6% vs . 23.3%, P  = 0.013) than those with ≤ 2 courses. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.

The effectiveness of consolidation chemotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Studies determining which early-stage cervical cancer patients with high-risk factors benefit from consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of consolidation chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: From 2010 to 2019, a retrospective review was conducted among high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients who were treated with postoperative CCRT or consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients with early-stage cervical cancer were included in this study. A total of 188 patients were in the consolidation chemotherapy group, and 105 patients were in the postoperative CCRT alone group. The median follow-up was 48.3 months (range: 3-123 months). In the survival analyses, no significant differences in DFS (P = 0.21) or OS (P = 0.15) were observed between the groups. The grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates in the consolidation group were higher than those in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group (54.8% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.02; 49.4% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.001, respectively). For patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (P = 0.013 and P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) compared with CCRT alone. CONCLUSION: For early-stage cervical cancer, consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT improved survival outcomes in patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors.

Non-operative management after chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation or sandwich (induction with bevacizumab and consolidation) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (NOMINATE trial).

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision (TME) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, neoadjuvant CRT has no recognised impact on reducing distant recurrence, and patients suffer from a long-lasting impairment in quality of life (QOL) associated with TME. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an alternative approach that could reduce distant metastases and increase the proportion of patients who could safely undergo non-operative management (NOM). This study is designed to compare two TNT regimens in the context of NOM for selecting a more optimal regimen for patients with LARC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: NOMINATE trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised phase II selection design study. Patients must have clinical stage II or III (T3-T4Nany) LARC with distal location (≤5 cm from the anal verge or for those who are candidates for abdominoperineal resection or intersphincteric resection). Patients will be randomised to either arm A consisting of CRT (50.4 Gy with capecitabine) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (six cycles of CapeOx), or arm B consisting of induction chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx plus bevacizumab) followed by CRT and consolidation chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx). In the case of clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR, patients will progress to NOM. Response assessment involves a combination of digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving pathological CR or cCR≥2 years, defined as the absence of local regrowth within 2 years after the start of NOM among eligible patients. Secondary endpoints include the cCR rate, near cCR rate, rate of NOM, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, time to disease-related treatment failure, TME-free survival, permanent stoma-free survival, safety of the treatment, completion rate of the treatment and QOL. Allowing for a drop-out rate of 10%, 66 patients (33 per arm) from five institutions will be accrued. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by Wakayama Medical University Certified Review Board in December 2020. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and on the jRCT website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs051200121.

Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy characterized by presence of abnormal clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow, with potential for uncontrolled growth causing destructive bone lesions, kidney injury, anemia, and hypercalcemia. Multiple myeloma is diagnosed in an estimated 34 920 people in the US and in approximately 588 161 people worldwide each year. OBSERVATIONS: Among patients with multiple myeloma, approximately 73% have anemia, 79% have osteolytic bone disease, and 19% have acute kidney injury at the time of presentation. Evaluation of patients with possible multiple myeloma includes measurement of hemoglobin, serum creatinine, serum calcium, and serum free light chain levels; serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation; 24-hour urine protein electrophoresis; and full-body skeletal imaging with computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. The Revised International Staging System combines data from the serum biomarkers ß2 microglobulin, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase in conjunction with malignant plasma cell genomic features found on fluorescence in situ hybridization-t(4;14), del(17p), and t(14;16)-to assess estimated progression-free survival and overall survival. At diagnosis, 28% of patients are classified as having Revised International Staging stage I multiple myeloma, and these patients have a median 5-year survival of 82%. Among all patients with multiple myeloma, standard first-line (induction) therapy consists of a combination of an injectable proteasome inhibitor (ie, bortezomib), an oral immunomodulatory agent (ie, lenalidomide), and dexamethasone and is associated with median progression-free survival of 41 months, compared with historical reports of 8.5 months without therapy. This induction therapy combined with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation followed by maintenance lenalidomide is standard of care for eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Approximately 34 920 people in the US and 155 688 people worldwide are diagnosed with multiple myeloma each year. Induction therapy with an injectable proteasome inhibitor, an oral immunomodulatory agent and dexamethasone followed by treatment with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide are among the treatments considered standard care for eligible patients.

The effect of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation on the prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To verify the role of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for bulky and locally advanced cervical cancer, a meta-analysis was performed. Based on articles published up to Jun 2020 a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies. A total of 4 articles consisting of 1659 patients were enrolled. The pooled results revealed that overall survival (OS) of patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT + CT) was significantly superior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88, p < .0001). The meta-analysis reviewed that the progression-free survival rate (PFS) of patients treated with CCRT + CT was significantly superior to CCRT alone (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87, p < .00001). The pooled results revealed a significant reduction of local recurrence rate for the CCRT + CT group (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, p < .00001). The pooled meta-analysis also showed a significant reduction of distant recurrence rate for the CCRT + CT group (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.44-0.69, p < .00001). The pooled results of grade 3/4 bone marrow suppression were calculated as OR and presented with a 95% CI (OR = 15.85; 95% CI: 9.48, 26.5, p < .00001), indicating patients who received CCRT + CT are more likely to suffer 3/4 bone marrow suppression than those treated with CCRT alone. In conclusion, patients who received chemoradiation with consolidation chemotherapy showed a significantly longer PFS, longer OS, lower local recurrence rate and distant recurrence rate compared to traditional concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Since CCRT was recommended as the standard treatment for cervical cancer, there was still a 20-30% chance of local recurrence, and 18-25% of distant recurrence for cervical cancer patients. Aiming to completely eradicate potential undetected micrometastases, consolidation chemotherapy came into the area of interest. We conducted a meta-analysis to verify the role of consolidation chemotherapy in cervical cancer.What do the results of this study add? The addition of consolidation CT resulted in a longer overall survival rate (OS) and progression-free survival rate (PFS), mainly due to control of local and distant relapses, especially the latter one. Toxicity followed consolidation CT increased but still clinically manageable.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In the future, we need more clinical studies with high quality to verify the role of consolidation CT in cervical cancer, and further to optimise the criteria for it.

Propensity-score matched analysis of the efficacy of maintenance/continuous therapy in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: a multicenter retrospective collaborative study of the Japanese Society of Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance ± consolidation or continuous therapy is considered a standard of care for both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, long-term benefits of such therapy have not yet been clarified in the context of clinical practice. PURPOSE: To clarify the efficacy of maintenance/continuous approach, we retrospectively analyzed the cohort data of newly diagnosed MM patients by propensity-score matching based on age, gender, revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage, and implementation of transplantation to reduce the bias due to confounding variables. FINDINGS: Among 720 patients, 161 were identified for each of the maintenance and no maintenance groups. Maintenance/continuous therapy employed immunomodulatory drugs (n = 83), proteasome inhibitors (n = 48), combination of both (n = 29), or dexamethasone alone (n = 1). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the maintenance group compared with the no maintenance group (median 37.7 and 21.9 months, p = 0.0002, respectively). Prolongation of PFS was observed in both transplanted and non-transplanted patients (p = 0.017 and p = 0.0008, respectively), with standard risk (p < 0.00001), R-ISS stage I (p = 0.037) and stage II (p = 0.00094), and those without obtaining complete response (p = 0.0018). There was no significant benefit in overall survival (OS), but it tended to be better in the maintenance group in non-transplanted patients. Regarding the treatment pattern, the substitution or addition of drugs different from the induction therapy and the combination with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors appeared to be more beneficial for PFS but not OS. CONCLUSION: These results support the benefit of current maintenance/continuous approach in routine clinical practice in the management of MM.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. CONCLUSION: Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.

Full or intensity-reduced high-dose melphalan and single or double autologous stem cell transplant with or without bortezomib consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: A post hoc subgroup analysis of two phase III trials (NCT00416273, NCT00416208) was carried out to investigate the influence of 100/140 and 200 mg/m² melphalan as well as single/double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the effect of bortezomib consolidation on PFS was analyzed. METHODS: Following induction therapy and high-dose melphalan with subsequent ASCT, patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were randomized 1:1 to either four 35-day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (1.6 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22) or observation. RESULTS: Of the 340 patients included in this analysis, 13.5% received 1 × MEL100/140, 22.9% 2 × MEL100/140, 31.2% 1 × MEL200, and 32.4% 2 × MEL200. With higher cumulative melphalan dose, PFS improved (P = .0085). PFS curves of patients treated with 2 × MEL100/140 and 1 × MEL200 were very similar. The superior dose effect of MEL200 over MEL100/140 was non-existent in the bortezomib consolidation arm but pronounced in the observation arm (P = .0015). Similarly, double ASCT was only beneficial in patients without bortezomib consolidation (P = .0569). CONCLUSIONS: Full dose melphalan and double transplantation seem advantageous only as long as patients are not receiving bortezomib consolidation afterwards.

Successful use of trametinib and dasatinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of Ph-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report.

RATIONALE: Relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia poses a significant clinical challenge due to its poor prognosis, showing survival rates of less than a year even with the use of novel therapies. In this report, we describe the safe and effective use of trametinib combined with dasatinib in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the successful use of 2 targeted drugs such as trametinib and dasatinib in a pediatric patient with Ph+ ALL and recurrent pancreatitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 6-year-old boy with ALL and Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) who had recurrent asparaginase-associated pancreatitis. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with ALL, based on clinical features, laboratory analyses, bone marrow aspiration evaluation in morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with dasatinib combined with an intermediate risk-oriented chemotherapy. However, owing to recurrent asparaginase-associated pancreatitis, the patient has to abandon asparaginase in consolidation. Considering the high risk of relapse, we used trametinib and dasatinib combined with chemotherapy as maintenance chemotherapy. OUTCOMES: After 6 months, there were no obvious side effects or residual disease. LESSONS: We suggest that the combination of trametinib and dasatinib may represent a viable option to treat patients with potential relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL.

Phase II clinical trial using anti-CD3 × anti-HER2 bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (HER2 BATs) consolidation therapy for HER2 negative (0-2+) metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic human epidermal growth receptor II (HER2) negative breast cancer remains incurable. Our phase I study showed that anti-CD3 × anti-HER2 bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (HER2 BATs) may be effective against HER2-tumors. This phase II trial evaluates the efficacy and immune responses of HER2 BATs given to patients with metastatic HER2-estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive (HR+) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) as immune consolidation after chemotherapy. The primary objective of this study was to increase the traditional median time to progression after failure of first-line therapy of 2-4 months with the secondary endpoints of increasing overall survival (OS) and immune responses. METHODS: HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients received 3 weekly infusions of HER2 BATs and a boost after 12 weeks. RESULTS: This phase II study included 24 HER2-HR+ and 8 TNBC patients who received a mean of 3.75 and 2.4 lines of prior chemotherapy, respectively. Eight of 32 evaluable patients were stable at 4 months after the first infusion. There were no dose limiting toxicities. Tumor markers decreased in 13 of 23 (56.5%) patients who had tumor markers. The median OS was 13.1 (95% CI 8.6 to 17.4), 15.2 (95% CI 8.6 to 19.8), and 12.3 (95% CI 2.1 to 17.8) months for the entire group, HER2-HR+, and TNBC patients, respectively. Median OS for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive and chemotherapy-resistant disease after chemotherapy was 14.6 (9.6-21.8) and 8.6 (3.3-17.3) months, respectively. There were statistically significant increases in interferon-γ immunospots, Th1 cytokines, Th2 cytokines, and chemokines after HER2 BATs infusions. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated HER2-patients, immune consolidation with HER2 BATs after chemotherapy appears to increase the proportion of patients who were stable at 4 months and the median OS for both groups as well as increased adaptive and innate antitumor responses. Future studies combining HER2 BATs with checkpoint inhibitors or other immunomodulators may improve clinical outcomes.

Consolidation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer.

Consolidation therapy describes dose intensification strategies or additional treatment performed following completion of the primary regimen. In the case of esophageal cancer, this applies to cases of potentially persistent disease after definitive multi-modality therapy, including surgery. Consolidation should also be considered for patients initially planned to undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy, but for any reason elected a nonoperative strategy during treatment. With the advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, additional options may be available for consolidation in the future.

Impact of Dose Delays and Alternative Dosing Regimens on Pertuzumab Pharmacokinetics.

PERJETA (pertuzumab), administered with Herceptin (trastuzumab), is used in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Pertuzumab is currently approved with an initial loading dose of 840 mg, followed by a 420-mg maintenance dose intravenously every 3 weeks. A reloading dose is required if there is a ≥6-week delay in treatment. In response to the potential treatment disruption due to COVID-19, the impact of dose delays and alternative dosing regimens on intravenous pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer treatment is presented. Simulations were conducted by using the validated population pharmacokinetic model for pertuzumab, and included (1) 4-, 6-, and 9-week dose delays of the 840 mg/420 mg every 3 weeks dosing regimen and (2) 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks alternative dosing regimens. Simulations were compared with the currently approved pertuzumab dosing regimen. The simulations in 1000 virtual patients showed that a dose reload (840 mg) is required following a dose delay of ≥6 weeks to maintain comparable Ctrough (lowest concentration before the next dose is given) levels to clinical trials. The 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks alternative dosing regimens decrease median steady-state Ctrough by ≈40% compared with the approved regimen, and <90% of patients will be above the target Ctrough . Thus, the alternative 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks pertuzumab dosing regimens are not recommended. Flexibility for intravenous PERJETA-based regimens is available with an alternative route of pertuzumab administration (subcutaneous vs intravenous).

Phase II consolidation trial with anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after a second remission.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of hu3S193, a humanized anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody, as a consolidation strategy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after salvage platinum-doublet chemotherapy. METHODS: This single-arm phase II study accrued patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with Lewis-Y expression by immunohistochemistry who had achieved a second complete response after five to eight cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous infusions of hu3S193, 30 mg/m2 every 2 weeks starting no more than 8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing for 12 doses, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the second remission. Secondary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. Most had a papillary/serous histology tumor (94%), stage III disease at diagnosis (75%), and five (17%) underwent secondary cytoreduction before salvage chemotherapy. Two patients were not eligible for efficacy but were considered for toxicity analysis. Eighteen patients (62%) completed the full consolidation treatment while nine patients progressed on treatment. At the time of analysis, 23 patients (85%) of the eligible population had progressed and seven of these patients (26%) had died. Median progression-free survival of the second remission was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.6-13.9), with a 1-year progression-free survival of the second remission rate of 50.1%. The trial was terminated early since it was unlikely that the primary objective would be achieved. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (55%) and vomiting (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Hu3S193 did not show sufficient clinical activity as consolidation therapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01137071.

Invited Review: Will Consolidation with ASCT Be a Thing of the Past for MCL and PTCL?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment landscape of mantle cell (MCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) is rapidly changing; however, despite improvement in patients' survival, they still remain a largely incurable diseases. Treatment choice is dependent on patient factors, prior therapy, remission duration, and candidacy for stem cell transplantation (SCT). There are subsets of high-risk patients who do not benefit substantially from autologous SCT (ASCT) and for whom alternative targeted approaches are being examined. Here, we critically analyze the actual role of ASCT in PTCL and MCL. RECENT FINDINGS: Research in areas of maintenance therapy and minimal residual disease is ongoing to identify MCL patients who may not require ASCT for durable response. Moreover, there are subsets of high-risk MCL patients who do not benefit substantially from ASCT and for whom alternative, targeted approaches are being examined. Much less clear evidence exists regarding the impact of consolidative ASCT in PTCL, mainly for the heterogeneity of these lymphomas: it is still controversial whether patients who achieved a complete response significantly take advantage of this procedure over active surveillance only. Several clinical and biologic markers are available to predict prognosis; however, despite improvements in outcomes, standard therapeutic approaches have not been able to overcome high-risk disease features for PTCL and MCL. Thus, the need of ASCT for these diseases is still matter of debate among hematologists.

Intermediate dose cytarabine improves survival and relapse-free rate compared with standard-dose cytarabine as post-remission treatment for acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospection study.

ABSTRACT: The exact dose of cytarabine still remain controversial for the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after complete remission (CR), but recent studies favor lower doses. This study aimed to investigate the toxic effects of single-intermediate dose (ID) cytarabine in patients with AML after achieving CR, compared with standard-dose cytarabine.In this retrospective study, AML patients who achieved CR after consolidation therapy before enrollment between 07/2008 and 05/2019 were included. All patients were divided into single-ID cytarabine and standard-dose cytarabine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) and relapse-free time (RFS). Cox regression models were used to assess factors independently associated with OS and RFS. The toxic side effects of hematology and non-hematology were observed.52 patients were enrolled. There were 33 in ID group, 19 in Standard dose group. The 3-year RFS rate (40.4% vs 22.2%, P = .031) was better in the ID group than in the standard-dose group, while the 3-year OS rate was not different between the 2 groups (50.2% vs 27.8%, P = .074). Treatment stratage of ID cytarabine chemotherapy significantly improve the prognosis of AML regardless of patient age, risk grade, WBC count. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in grade 3 to 4 bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal symptoms, blood transfusion, infections.Patients with AML receiving ID cytarabine showed better survival and similar toxicity profiles compared with patients who received standard-dose cytarabine.

Impact of high dose cytarabine dosing strategies in obese patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

High dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The increasing prevalence of obesity and the toxicity risk with this therapy renders important the quantification of potential risks with weight-based dosing in this patient population. The American Society of Clinical Oncology published recommendations on chemotherapy dosing in obese patients, but patients with leukemia were excluded from analysis. This was a retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy outcomes in obese and non-obese patients with AML who received HIDAC consolidation. Thirty-nine (41.9 %) patients received dose adjusted HIDAC in cycle 1. Nine of the 40 patients in the obese group received HIDAC dose-adjusted for obesity. The combined incidence of cycle delays, febrile neutropenia, or documented infection was 41.5 % in non-obese patients compared to 57.5 % in obese patients (p = 0.127). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were not reached in both cohorts. The estimated 36-month overall survival was 76.4 % (95 % CI 0.623-0.905) in non-obese patients, compared to 66.1 % (95 % CI 0.472-0.85) in obese patients. There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes for obese versus non-obese patients who received HIDAC consolidation. For class III obesity, baseline dose-adjustments were more common.