Anatomical damages in the spinal nerve roots and the spinal cord after brachial plexus injury: descriptive study from a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent DREZ-lesioning for pain-practical implications.

BACKGROUND: Systematic descriptions of anatomical damage after brachial plexus injury (BPI) at the intradural level have been scarcely reported in detail. However, considering these damages, not only in the spinal nerve roots but also in the spinal cord itself, is crucial in determining the appropriate surgical approach to restore upper limb function and address refractory pain. Therefore, the authors present a descriptive study focusing on intradural findings observed during microsurgical DREZ-lesioning. METHODS: This study enrolled 19 consecutive patients under the same protocol. Microsurgical observation through exposure of C4 to Th1 medullary segments allowed to describe the lesions in spinal nerve roots, meninges, and spinal cord. Electrical stimulation of the ventral roots checked the muscle responses. RESULTS: Extensive damage was observed among the 114 explored roots (six roots per patient), with only 21 (18.4%) ventral (VR) and 17 (14.9%) dorsal (DR) roots retaining all rootlets intact. Damage distribution varied, with the most frequent impairments in C6 VRs (18 patients) and the least in Th1 VRs (14 patients), while in all the 19 patients for the C6 DRs (the most frequently impaired) and in 14 patients for Th1 DRs (the less impaired). C4 roots were found damaged in 12 patients. Total or partial avulsions affected 63.3% and 69.8% of DRs and VRs, respectively, while 15.8% and 14.0% of the 114 DRs and VRs were atrophic, maintaining muscle responses to stimulation in half of those VRs. Pseudomeningoceles were present in 11 patients but absent in 46% of avulsed roots. Adhesive arachnoiditis was noted in 12 patients, and dorsal horn parenchymal alterations in 10. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of intradural lesions post-BPI helps in guiding surgical indications for repair and functional neurosurgery for pain control.

[Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment of neuropathic pain by the spinal cord dorsal root entry zone].

In order to promote the standardization of the treatment of neuropathic pain by spinal dorsal root entry surgery, alleviate the pain of certain specific neuropathic pain patients, and improve their quality of life and survival, experts with experience in neuropathic pain and spinal dorsal root entry surgery were organized by Functional Neurosurgery Group of the Neurosurgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and Functional Neurosurgery Expert Committee of Chinese Congress of Neurological Surgeons to write this consensus. Based on a systematic review and summary of literature and clinical evidence at home and abroad, this consensus discusses the diagnosis and drug treatment of neuropathic pain, clinical application of, spinal dorsal root entry surgery the selection of patients receiving surgery of dorsal root entry zone, preoperative examination, surgical procedures, postoperative management, and the prevention and management of postoperative complications, and forms 12 recommended recommendations, providing reference and guidance for clinical work on the treatment of neuropathic pain through spinal dorsal root entry surgery.

[Efficacy analysis of OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF) combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots(RNRs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 92 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated by oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation from June 2019 to June 2022 was performed. There were 32 males and 60 females, aged from 44 to 82 years old with an average of (63.67±9.93) years old. All patients were divided into RNRs positive group and RNRs negative group according to redundancy or not before operation. There were 38 patients in RNRs positive group, including 15 males and 23 females. The age ranged from 45 to 82 years old with an average of (65.45±10.37) years old. The disease duration was 24.00(12.00, 72.00) months. There were 54 patients in RNRs negative group, including 17 males and 37 females. The age ranged from 44 to 77 years old with an average of (62.42±9.51) years old. The disease duration was 13.50(9.00, 36.00) months. The general data of patients were recorded, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications. The imaging parameters before and after operation were observed, including the number of stenosis segments, intervertebral space height, lumbar lordosis angle and dural sac area. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the back and lower extremity pain, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the activities of daily living. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 8 to 18 months with an average of (11.04±3.61) months, and no complications were found during the follow-up period.The number of stenosis segments in RNRs positive group (1.71±0.46) was more than that in RNRs negative group(1.17±0.38). In RNRs positive group, intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, lower extremity pain VAS, ODI score were (1.11±0.19) cm, (0.46±0.17) cm2, (5.39±1.00) scores, (5.05±1.01) points, (55.74±4.05) points, respectively. RNRs negative groups respectively (0.97±0.23) cm, (0.69±0.26) cm2, (4.50±0.77) scores, (4.00±0.58) scores, (47.33±3.43) %. In RNRs positive group, intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, ODI score were (1.60±0.19) cm, (0.74±0.36) cm2, (3.39±0.72) scores, (3.05±1.01) scores, (46.74±4.82) scores, respectively. RNRs negative groups respectively (1.48±0.25) cm, (1.12±0.35) cm2, (3.00±0.82) scores, (3.00±0.82) scores, (37.67±3.58) %. The postoperative intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS score, lower extremity pain VAS and ODI score of the patients in the RNRs positive group and the negative group were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the number of stenosed segments, preoperative intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, lower extremity pain VAS, and ODI between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in postoperative intervertebral space height and postoperative ODI between the two groups(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in intervertebral space height before and after operation and ODI score before and after operation(P>0.05). There were significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative dural sac area, difference of dural sac area before and after operation, postoperative low back pain VAS, difference of low back pain VAS score before and after operation, difference of lower extremity pain VAS before and after operation between the two groups(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation has a good effect on patients with or without RNRs. Multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis and decreased dural sac area may lead to the occurrence of RNRs, and LSS patients with RNRs have more severe symptoms. LSS patients with RNRs have worse surgical outcomes than those without RNRs.

Cervical Nerve Root Block Using a Curved Blunt Needle and Posterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections have become less popular due to the risk of catastrophic complications they pose. However, cervical nerve root blocks are useful for surgical planning in patients with cervical radicular pain syndromes. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to find a method of performing cervical selective nerve root blocks that removed the risk of catastrophic complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Academic multidisciplinary spine center. METHODS: Among patients, 50 consecutive cases were retrospectively reviewed for immediate pain scores and follow-up results. In the intervention, a posterior approach using a curved blunt needle was employed for cervical selective nerve root blocks to minimize the risk of arterial injection. To measure the outcomes, we used quantitative pain severity scores and qualitative responses. RESULTS: This technique detailed in this study has a high immediate analgesic effect that can be used for diagnostic purposes. It is not known if this technique has prognostic value with respect to surgery. The prolonged response rate is about 50%, which is in line with other techniques. LIMITATIONS: This study had no control group. CONCLUSION(S): Cervical selective nerve root blocks using a curved blunt needle and a posterior approach are effective in selectively identifying nerves that cause clinical symptoms. This technique minimizes the risk of arterial or spinal cord impingement and therefore may be safer than transforaminal selective nerve root blocks.

Syringo-Subarachnoid Shunt with Tube Versus T-Tube via the Dorsal Root Entry Zone Approach for Eccentric Syringomyelia.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical therapeutic efficacy of syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube and T-tube via the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 41 patients with idiopathic or secondary eccentric syringomyelia from November 2011 to December 2022. Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube or T-tube via the DREZ approach was performed. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association low back pain scale was used to investigate the severity of clinical symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate therapeutic efficacy（reduction of the cavity volume by >10% was considered an improvement and 50% was considered a significant improvement). RESULTS: Incision length of the spinal cortex in the direct tube group was shorter than in the T-tube group (3.10 ± 0.28 cm vs. 5.03 ± 0.19 cm), with a significant difference between the 2 groups (t = -52.56, P < 0.001). Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 3 months postoperatively was significantly better than the preoperative score in both the direct tube group（t = 40.954, P < 0.001） and the T-tube group（t = 24.769, P < 0.001）. Statistical comparison revealed there was no difference in imaging improvement between the direct tube group and T-tube group 3 months (χ2 = 0.20, P = 0.655) and 12 months (χ2 = 0.21, P = 0.647) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube via the DREZ approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia is safer than with T-tube via the DREZ approach due to smaller incision length and less of a space-occupying effect with same therapeutic efficacy.

C5 nerve root palsy (without prior cervical decompression) case series: 9 patients with critical delay to presentation.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between cervical nerve root and intrinsic shoulder pathology can be a difficult task given the overlapping and often coexisting symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to highlight the often-complicated presentation of these symptoms and the subsequent potential for delay in care regarding this subset of patients. METHODS: A total of 9 patients, managed by one of two different surgeons, were identified with a history of C5 nerve root palsy. A chart review was conducted, and the following information was recorded: presenting complaint, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, time from symptom onset to presentation to a spine surgeon, first specialist seen for symptoms, non-spinal advanced imaging and treatment conducted before diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative exam, time to recovery, and type of surgery. RESULTS: We observed an average time from onset of symptoms to presentation to a spine surgeon to be 31.6 weeks. These patients' time to full recovery after cervical decompression was 15 weeks. CONCLUSION: : We observed a critical delay to presentation in this series of patients with C5 nerve palsy. C5 nerve palsy should remain an elemental part of the differential diagnosis in the setting of any shoulder or neck pain presenting with weakness.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy: Analysis of two rootlet sectioning techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the efficacy of two selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) techniques with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, using instrumented three-dimensional gait analysis. INTRODUCTION: SDR is a common, irreversible surgical treatment increasingly used to address gait disturbances in children with chronic non-progressive encephalopathy by reducing spasticity. Various techniques have been used, which mainly differ in the percentage of rootlets selected for sectioning. A greater proportion of rootlets sectioned leads to a more effective reduction of spasticity; however, there is a potential risk of unwanted neurological effects resulting from excessive deafferentation. While there is evidence of the short- and long-term benefits and complications of SDR, no studies have compared the effectiveness of each technique regarding gait function and preservation of the force-generating capacity of the muscles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Instrumented three-dimensional gait analysis was used to evaluate two groups of patients with spastic cerebral palsy treated by the same neurosurgeon in different time periods, initially using a classic technique (cutting 50% of the nerve rootlets) and subsequently a conservative technique (cutting no more than 33% the nerve rootlets). RESULTS: In addition to an increase in knee joint range of motion (ROM), in children who underwent SDR with the conservative technique, a statistically significant increase (p = 0.04) in the net joint power developed by the ankle was observed. Patients who underwent SDR with the conservative technique developed a maximum net ankle joint power of 1.37 ± 0.61 (unit: W/BW), whereas those who were operated with the classic technique developed a maximum net ankle joint power of 0.98 ± 0.18 (unit: W/BW). The conservative group not only showed greater improvement in net ankle joint power but also demonstrated more significant enhancements in minimum knee flexion during the stance phase and knee extension at initial contact. CONCLUSION: Our results show that both techniques led to a reduction in spasticity with a positive impact on the gait pattern. In addition, patients treated with the conservative technique were able to develop greater net ankle joint power, leading to a better scenario for rehabilitation and subsequent gait.

Gabapentin as part of a multimodal pain protocol for selective dorsal rhizotomy does not impact percentage of rootlets transected.

PURPOSE: We aim to determine whether preoperatively initiated gabapentin for pain control impacts the percentage of rootlets cut during monitored, limited laminectomy selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) procedure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes participants with cerebral palsy who had SDR for treatment of spasticity between 2010 and 2019 at a single-institution tertiary care center. One-level laminectomy SDR aimed to evaluate the cauda equina roots from levels L2-S1 with EMG monitoring. Gabapentin titration began 3 weeks prior to SDR. Data was analyzed using simple linear regression. Thirty-one individuals met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 7 years, 4 months. Eighteen participants (58%) identified as male, 12 (39%) female, and one (3%) non-binary. Thirty (97%) had bilateral CP. Sixteen (52%) were GMFCS II, four (13%) GMFCS III, five (16%) GMFCS IV, and six (19%) GMFCS V. RESULTS: Mean percentage of rootlets transected was 50.75% (SD 6.00, range 36.36-60.87). There was no relationship between the dose of gabapentin at time of SDR and percentage of rootlets cut with a linear regression slope of - 0.090 and an R2 of 0.012 (P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that preoperative initiation of gabapentin did not impact the percentage of rootlets transected. Thus, gabapentin can be initiated prior to SDR at moderate dosages without impacting SDR surgical outcomes.

Anatomical Analysis of the S1 Neural Foramen Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Imaging: Insights for Effective S1 Nerve Root Block.

OBJECTIVE: The first sacral nerve root block (S1 NRB) is used to diagnose and treat lumbosacral and radicular pain. This study aims to clarify the anatomy of the S1 neural foramen using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images and to establish the optimal fluoroscopic angle, localize the S1 neural foramen on fluoroscopy, and determine the safe puncture depth for S1 NRB. METHODS: In this single-center cohort study, 200 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent preoperative CT were enrolled. Four distinct studies were conducted using the CT data. Study 1 examined the correlation of the sacral slope angle and the supine and prone positions. Study 2 analyzed the tunnel view angle (TVA) using 3D reconstruction. Study 3 ascertained the location of the S1 neural foramen in fluoroscopy images. Study 4 investigated the safe depth for performing S1 NRB. RESULTS: The regression analysis in Study 1 revealed a correlation of the sacral slope angle and the supine and prone positions. Study 2 determined an optimal fluoroscopic TVA of approximately 30° for the S1 NRB. Study 3 found that the S1 neural foramen was located caudal to the L5 pedicle 1.7 ± 0.2 times the distance between the L4 and L5 pedicles. Study 4 revealed that the depths of the S1 neural foramen and root were 27.0 ± 2.1 mm and 16.5 ± 2.0 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests an optimal fluoroscopic angle, a simple method to locate the S1 neural foramen on fluoroscopy, and an ideal puncture depth for a safe and effective S1 NRB.

Differentiation between Anterior and Posterior Roots Using Compound Muscle Action Potential in Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumor Surgery.

This study aims to determine the cutoff values for the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) stimulus in anatomically identified anterior (motor nerve) and posterior roots (sensory nerve) during cervical intradural extramedullary tumor surgery. The connection between CMAP data from nerve roots and postoperative neurological symptoms in thoracolumbar tumors was compared with data from cervical lesions. The participants of the study included 22 patients with intradural extramedullary spinal tumors (116 nerve roots). The lowest stimulation intensity to the nerve root at which muscle contraction occurs was defined as the minimal activation intensity (MAI) in the CMAP. In cervical tumors, the MAI was measured after differentiating between the anterior and posterior roots based on the anatomical placement of the dentate ligament and nerve roots. The MAIs for 20 anterior roots in eight cervical tumors were between 0.1 and 0.3 mA, whereas those for 19 posterior roots were between 0.4 and 2.0 mA. The cutoff was <0.4 mA for both the anterior and posterior roots, and sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. In thoracolumbar tumors, the nerve root was severed in 12 of 14 cases. All MAIs were determined to be at the dorsal roots as their scores were higher than the cutoff and did not indicate motor deficits. The MAIs of the anatomically identified anterior and posterior root CMAPs were found to have a cutoff value of <0.4 mA in the cervical lesions. Similar MAI cutoffs were also applicable to thoracolumbar lesions. Thus, CMAP may be useful in detecting anterior and posterior roots in spinal tumor surgery.

Sacral Tarlov perineurial cysts: a systematic review of treatment options.

Tarlov perineurial spinal cysts (TCs) are an underrecognized cause of spinal neuropathic symptoms. TCs form within the sensory nerve root sleeves, where CSF extends distally and can accumulate pathologically. Typically, they develop at the sacral dermatomes where the nerve roots are under the highest hydrostatic pressure and lack enclosing vertebral foramina. In total, 90% of patients are women, and genetic disorders that weaken connective tissues, e.g., Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, convey considerable risk. Most small TCs are asymptomatic and do not require treatment, but even incidental visualizations should be documented in case symptoms develop later. Symptomatic TCs most commonly cause sacropelvic dermatomal neuropathic pain, as well as bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. Large cysts routinely cause muscle atrophy and weakness by compressing the ventral motor roots, and multiple cysts or multiroot compression by one large cyst can cause even greater cauda equina syndromes. Rarely, giant cysts erode the sacrum or extend as intrapelvic masses. Disabling TCs require consideration for surgical intervention. The authors' systematic review of treatment analyzed 31 case series of interventional percutaneous procedures and open surgical procedures. The surgical series were smaller and reported somewhat better outcomes with longer term follow-up but slightly higher risks. When data were lacking, authorial expertise and case reports informed details of the specific interventional and surgical techniques, as well as medical, physical, and psychological management. Cyst-wrapping surgery appeared to offer the best long-term outcomes by permanently reducing cyst size and reconstructing the nerve root sleeves. This curtails ongoing injury to the axons and neuronal death, and may also promote axonal regeneration to improve somatic and autonomic sacral nerve function.

Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning Following Unresponsive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning are important therapeutic options for intractable post-traumatic neuropathic pain (PNP). However, surgical choice is controversial due to the need to maximize pain relief and reduce complications. This study aims to retrospectively analyze the effect and complications of DREZ lesioning for patients with PNP who were unresponsive to SCS and provide a surgical reference. METHODS: Demographic data and surgical characteristics of patients with PNP who underwent DREZ lesioning after an unresponsive SCS were reviewed. Long-term outcomes including numeric rating scale, global impression of change, and long-term complications were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate pain-free survival. RESULTS: Of 19 patients with PNP, 8 had brachial plexus injury (BPI), 7 had spinal cord injury, 2 had cauda equina injury, 1 had intercostal nerve injury, and 1 had lumbosacral plexus injury. All patients were unresponsive or had a recurrence of pain after SCS, with an average pain-relief rate of 9.3%. After DREZ lesioning, the mean numeric rating scale scores significantly decreased from 7.6 ± 1.5 to 1.8 ± 1.7, with an average pain-relief rate of 75.3%. Seven patients (36.8%) experienced worsened neurologic dysfunction at the last follow-up. Patients with BPI had a significantly better outcome than other pathologies (P < 0.001) after DREZ lesioning. CONCLUSIONS: DREZ lesioning is an effective alternative procedure to SCS for patients with PNP who have lost limb function. Particularly for those with BPI, DREZ lesioning has shown good efficacy and can be considered a preferred surgical option.

Surgical Neuropelveology: Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Excision of a Pelvic Schwannoma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show how advanced pelvic Schwannoma can be safely managed with a laparoscopic approach. DESIGN: Demonstration of the laparoscopic technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: Schwannomas are benign tumors that arise from well-differentiated Schwann cells (glial cells) of peripheral nerve sheaths. Schwannomas are nonaggressive, slow-growing, solitary masses with a low rate of malignant transformation and a low risk of recurrence after resection. They rarely occur in the pelvis, with a reported incidence of 1% to 3%. Tumors involving spinal nerve roots commonly present with radicular pain and nerve compression syndromes (Supplemental Video 1-3). This video shows the management of pelvic Schwannoma originating from the left sacral root S1 by a minimally invasive approach. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing excision of a pelvic Schwannoma. CONCLUSION: Historically, pelvic schwannomas have been managed mainly by laparotomy. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a large pelvic Schwannoma excision by a minimally invasive approach.

Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain: a case series.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning can be performed in patients with intractable pain following brachial plexus avulsion (BPA). However, post-operative outcomes are variable and it is uncommonly used. We sought to determine the pain outcomes and complication profile of DREZ lesioning for BPA. SETTING: Quaternary neurosurgical centre. METHODS: All patients that had undergone DREZ lesioning for BPA pain over a 13-year period were included. Patients were assessed for outcome with regard to degree of pain relief and presence of complications. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were reviewed, with a median post-operative follow-up duration of 27 months (1-145 months). Of these, ten were contactable for long-term telephone review, with a median post-operative duration of 37 months (11-145 months). At earliest review post-operatively, 12 of 14 patients (86%) had some level of pain relief: complete pain relief in four patients (29%) and partial pain relief in eight patients (57%). At most recent post-operative review, ten of 14 patients (71%) reported lasting significant pain relief: four (29%) had complete pain relief, six (43%) had partial pain relief and four (29%) had insignificant pain relief. Complications were predominantly sensory, including ataxia, hypoaesthesia and dysaesthesia. Four patients (29%) reported persistent motor complications at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DREZ lesioning is uncommonly performed. It remains a reasonable option for relief of refractory BPA pain in selected cases, though there is a significant complication rate. Future prospective studies may enable quantification of pre- and post-lesioning analgesic use, another important determinant of procedure success.

Indications and Technique for the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Brachial Plexus Surgery.

Confirming the presence or absence of a functioning nerve root in traumatic brachial plexus injuries is vital in the surgical decision-making process. Intraoperative neuromonitoring can confirm intact rootlets with the use of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. The purpose of this article is to describe the rationale and details of intraoperative neuromonitoring to provide a basic understanding of its role in decision-making in patients with brachial plexus injuries.

Minimally Invasive Preganglionic C2 Root Section for Occipital Neuralgia: 2 Case Reports and Operative Video.

BACKGROUND: Occipital neuralgia is a painful condition that is believed to occur from processes that affect the greater, lesser, or third occipital nerves. Diagnosis is often made with a combination of classical symptoms, tenderness over the occipital region, and response to occipital nerve blocks. Cervical computed tomography or MRI may be obtained in multiple positions to detect any impingement. Diagnosis can be made with MRI tractography. Nonsurgical treatments include local anesthetic and steroid injections, anticonvulsant medications, botulinum toxin injections, physical therapy, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, cryoneurolysis, and radiofrequency ablation. Surgical treatments include greater occipital nerve decompression, C2 root section, intradural dorsal root rhizotomy, C1-2 fusion, and occipital nerve stimulation. Although stimulation has been favored in the past decade, complications and maintenance of the devices have led us to return to C2 ganglionectomy. OBJECTIVE: To report on the use of a minimally invasive technique for C2 ganglionectomy to treat occipital neuralgia. METHODS: Review demographic, surgery, and outcome data of a minimally invasive C2 root ganglionectomy used to treat to 2 patients with occipital neuralgia. RESULTS: We report on 2 patients with clinically stereotypical unilateral occipital neuralgia confirmed by greater occipital nerve block, but with no imaging correlate. Both were successfully managed by C2 ganglionectomy through an 18-mm tubular retractor and outpatient surgery. Accompanying text, still photographs, and video describe the technique in detail. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive C2 ganglionectomy can be used to successfully treat occipital neuralgia.