Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, FMRS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs in solid tumors with CIT. The search was limited to articles published before April 30, 2022. Primary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reduction or delays, platelet transfusion, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and bleeding events. Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of platelet count > 400 × 109/L, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, thrombosis, and mortality. RESULTS: Our analysis encompassed six studies: five rigorous RCTs and one unique study comparing romiplostim to an observation group, involving a total of 489 patients. For primary outcomes, TPO-RAs significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the significance of the reduction in grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia incidence persisted (P = 0.008). TPO-RAs showed no significant impact on chemotherapy dose reduction or delays (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.01), platelet transfusion (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.48-2.27), or bleeding events (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.23-1.10). In terms of safety, there were no significant difference in the incidence of any AEs (RR = 0.98, 95% CI:0.92-1.04), serious AEs (RR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.45-1.40), thrombotic events (RR = 1.20, 95% CI:0.51-2.84) and mortality (RR = 1.15, 95% CI:0.55-2.41). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that TPO-RAs are generally well-tolerated. However, their efficacy in solid tumors with CIT appears limited, as they only demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for refractory thrombocytopenia in patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (ASC) transplantation (ASCT) is an effective treatment method for patients with hematological disorders and malignant diseases. The patient's ASCs are harvested prior to radiotherapy/chemotherapy, cryopreserved and then transfused back after the high-dose radiotherapy/chemotherapy conditioning treatment. Since some patients develop thrombocytopenia after receiving ASCT, it is difficult for them to bear simultaneously the management of their original disease and thrombocytopenia. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombocytopenia therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) after ASCT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical safety and efficacy of TPORA treatment for the enrolled 20 patients who developed thrombocytopenia after ASCT. The measured parameters were prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT), secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) and other calculated response index. Patients with platelet count (PC) ≤ 50×109/L were treated with TPORA, namely with either eltrombopag (Elt), hetrombopag (Het), or avatrobopag (Ava). RESULTS: The group of 20 patients, who received TPORA administration for their thrombocytopenia after ASCT, had a median age of 50 years (ranging between 17 and 60 years). The median administration time of TPORA application was 48 days (ranging from 7 to 451 days); an overall response rate (ORR) was 85% with no response in 15% of patients, while with complete response (CR) in 70% of patients and partial response (PR) in 15% of patients. The median platelet count was 19 × 109/L before TPORA treatment and increased to 87×109)/L after the treatment. The TPORA treatment was safe as only 4 patients (20%) displayed a mild transaminase elevation. No other reported side effects occurred, such as thrombosis, joint pain, diarrhea, and myelofibrosis. It was demonstrated that the short response time to TPORA treatment correlated to the fast platelet recovery, when the number of megakaryocytes in the bone marrow smear exceeded 35/4.5 cm2 under a low magnification of 100 times (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: TPORA therapy for thrombocytopenia occurring after the radiotherapy/ chemotherapy-conditioned ASCT was well tolerated and effective for platelets recovery.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Thrombocytopenia Secondary to HER2-Targeted Antibody Drug Conjugates.

Trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan are widely used in breast cancer and other solid tumor malignancies. Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse event associated with the use of these agents that can lead to a treatment delay, reduction in dose intensity, and discontinuation. The role of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) remains unknown in this setting. We report a case series of 6 individuals with breast cancer that experienced dose-reductions and therapy delays due to thrombocytopenia secondary to trastuzumab emtansine or trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy and received intervention with TPO-RA. All 6 were able to resume therapy with TPO-RA support.

Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Our Personal View.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired blood disorder that causes a reduction in circulating platelets with the potential for bleeding. The incidence of ITP is slightly higher in adults and affects more women than men until 60 years, when males are more affected. Despite advances in basic science, primary ITP remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The disease is heterogeneous in its clinical behavior and response to treatment. This reflects the complex underlying pathophysiology, which remains ill-understood. Platelet destruction plays a role in thrombocytopenia, but underproduction is also a major contributing factor. Active ITP is a proinflammatory autoimmune disease involving abnormalities within the T and B regulatory cell compartments, along with several other immunological abnormalities. Over the last several years, there has been a shift from using immunosuppressive therapies for ITP towards approved treatments, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has hastened this management shift, with thrombopoietin receptor agonists becoming the predominant second-line treatment. A greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms has led to the development of several targeted therapies, some of which have been approved, with others still undergoing clinical development. Here we outline our view of the disease, including our opinion about the major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We also discuss our management of adult ITP and our placement of the various available therapies.

Safety of romiplostim and eltrombopag for children with immune thrombocytopenia: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

BACKGROUND: Romiplostim and eltrombopag are thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) that have been approved by the FDA on 22 August 2008 and 20 November 2008 for pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, postmarketing pharmacovigilance of TPORAs in children still attracts much attention. We aimed to evaluate the safety of the TPORAs romiplostim and eltrombopag using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System database of FDA (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a disproportionality analysis and analyzed data from the FAERS database to characterize the key features of adverse events (AEs) associated with TPO-RAs approved for children under 18 years of age. RESULTS: Since their approval in the market in 2008, 250 and 298 reports of romiplostim and eltrombopag use in children have been published in the FAERS database, respectively. The most frequent AE associated with romiplostim and eltrombopag was epistaxis. Neutralizing antibodies and vitreous opacities showed the strongest signals for romiplostim and eltrombopag, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The labeled AEs for romiplostim and eltrombopag in children were analyzed. Unlabeled AEs may reflect the potential of new clinical individuals. Early recognition and management of AEs that appear in children treated with romiplostim and eltrombopag are of key importance in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic Assessment and Treatment Effect of Lusutrombopag in Child-Pugh Class C Patients: Review of Patient Data from Two Clinical Studies and Post-Marketing Surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease are at increased risk of bleeding during invasive procedures due to low platelet counts. Lusutrombopag, an orally active thrombopoietin receptor agonist, increases platelet count and reduces the need for platelet transfusion in chronic liver disease patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing a planned invasive procedure. The safety of lusutrombopag in patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease is not known. The present analysis was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lusutrombopag in patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease. METHODS: Data for patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease were collected from three data sets: a phase 1/2 Child-Pugh class C study (n = 5) (JapicCTI-163289 [Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center]), a phase 3 pivotal study (L-PLUS 2, n = 3) (NCT02389621 [Clinicaltrials.gov]), and ongoing post-marketing surveillance (n = 27) (JapicCTI-163432 [Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center]). Patients received lusutrombopag at 3 mg for up to 7 days. Safety and efficacy assessments were collected from two clinical studies and the post-marketing surveillance; pharmacokinetic data were collected from the phase 1/2 study. RESULTS: Mean Cmax and AUC0-τ were lower in Child-Pugh class C patients than Child-Pugh class A and B; individual patients' Cmax and AUC0-τ values overlapped among Child-Pugh classes. In lusutrombopag patients who did not receive platelet transfusion (n = 4 in phase 1/2, n = 1 in phase 3, n = 24 in post-marketing surveillance), the median (range) maximum platelet count was 88.5 × 109/L (54-105 × 109/L), 80 × 109/L, and 91 × 109/L (41-186 × 109/L; n = 23), respectively. There were no treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related serious adverse events. One patient from the phase 1/2 study had a non-serious portal vein thrombosis, which was not considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis presented in this study suggests that lusutrombopag increases platelet counts in Child-Pugh class C patients and is safe and well tolerated in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: L-PLUS 2: NCT02389621 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Phase 1/2: JapicCTI-163289 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center [JAPIC]). Post-marketing surveillance: JapicCTI-163432 (JAPIC).

Eltrombopag improves refractory thrombocytopenia in patients with Sjögren's syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Eltrombopag, a kind of thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, plays the role on the megakaryocyte to activate the platelet production and rapidly increase the number of circulating platelets in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Eltrombopag provides an opportunity for rapid tapering and/or cessation of corticosteroid therapy. However, it is not clear about the platelet response to Eltrombopag in ITP associated with Sjögren's Syndrome(SS). METHODS: A retrospective research was conducted on the clinical course of three patients, each with ITP secondary to SS, and initially received therapy of corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory. They took this drug for bleeding diseases. Referring to the description, Eltrombopag was prescribed and adjusted with an initial dose of 25 mg daily, then weekly, then monthly according to the monitoring of platelet counts. RESULTS: All patients maintained a satisfactory level of platelet counts (>100,000/mm3 for >2 years) following corticosteroid withdrawal. Meanwhile, Eltrombopag was well-tolerated, and there were no adverse effects, such as thrombotic events. CONCLUSIONS: Eltrombopag is effective and safe for patients with ITP associated with SS during corticosteroid withdrawal. Thus it may be a crucial therapeutic strategy for reducing corticosteroid-related side effects in SS patients with ITP.

Investigational drugs for immune thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease of unknown cause. Autoantibodies, self-reactive T cells and other immune abnormalities, with impairment of platelet production, lead to a reduced platelet count. Until recently, therapy was largely empirical using immune suppressants (none of which have undergone randomized clinical trials). These therapies have variable efficacy and are associated with predictable unwanted effects which impact patient quality-of-life. With greater understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, better, more targeted therapies have been developed; however, there is still an urgent need for additional classes of treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article covers new TPO receptor agonists, Syk inhibitors, Fcγ receptor antagonists, BTK and complement inhibitors, and other therapies. Insights into the most promising therapies are offered. Novel ITP treatments currently in clinical trials and those recently approved come under the spotlight. EXPERT OPINION: Thrombopoietin receptor agonists remain the most effective treatment for ITP and have changed the ITP therapeutic landscape remarkably. Other new molecules such as Fcγ receptor blockers, Bruton tyrosine kinase, complement inhibitors, and others are unlikely to enjoy the same success rate as the TPO-RAs, but nonetheless they will find a place in the management of patients with ITP.

Risk of thrombosis with thrombopoietin receptor agonists for ITP patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

One possible side effect of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in immune thrombocytopenia is thrombosis. Our aim is to systematically review whether patients with ITP that were treated with a TPO-RA have an increased risk for thrombosis as compared to ITP patients without TPO-RA. Patients in the intervention group were required to receive TPO-RA therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of thromboembolic events. Eleven studies were included in the pooled analysis. More thromboembolic events were noted in the TPO-RA group than in the control group: 25 compared to 4. Ten out of 11 studies showed a relative risk greater than 1. However, none of these individual risk ratios was statistically significant. The meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.82 [95 % CI 0.78-4.24]. Our findings indicate there is a non-significant higher chance of thrombosis in ITP patients with TPO-RA treatments versus ITP patients without TPO-RA treatment.

Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature.

The management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) involves several lines of therapy such as corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. With the emergence of novel therapies such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), there has been a shift in treatment modalities. Eltrombopag and romiplostim have proven to be effective in the management of ITP through clinical studies, but their safety in pregnancy remains uncertain. The purpose of the study is to review the literature to evaluate the safety of TPO-RAs in pregnant women. Ten case reports and a cohort study pertaining to the use of TPO-RAs in pregnancy were obtained. According to the reported cases and prospective study, the use of eltrombopag and romiplostim appears to be relatively safe in the first, second, and third trimesters, as there were no reported congenital malformations. Low fetal birth weight has been observed following the administration of eltrombopag during the second trimester, whereas preterm birth has occurred following the administration of eltrombopag in the third trimester. Eltrombopag and romiplostim seem relatively safe. Further studies are necessary to clarify their safety during pregnancy.

Characterization and prognosis of temozolomide-induced aplastic anemia in patients with central nervous system malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide-induced aplastic anemia (TIAA) is a rare but highly challenging complication of temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. Evidence describing prognosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment of this entity is very limited. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, 22-year observational cohort study of patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies treated with temozolomide who developed TIAA, retrospectively analyzing prognosis, complications, and recovery. TIAA was defined using adapted evidence-based severe aplastic anemia criteria incorporating profound cytopenias and a minimum duration (4 weeks) without hematologic recovery. RESULTS: Of 3821 patients with CNS malignancies receiving TMZ, 34 patients (0.89%) met criteria for TIAA. Onset was rapid, with 29 patients (85.3%) developing TIAA before completing a second TMZ cycle. 23 patients (67.6%) ultimately achieved a hematologic recovery. Patients without recovery were more likely to develop febrile neutropenia (72.7% vs. 30.4%, P = .03), infectious complications (45.5% vs. 8.7%, P = .02), require hospitalization (81.8% vs. 43.5%, P = .04), and die (100.0% vs. 60.9%, P = .02). Median overall survival from TIAA diagnosis was 752 days in patients achieving a partial hematologic recovery versus 28 days in those who did not (P < .0001). 29 patients (85.3%) received one or more hematopoietic growth factors; hematologic recovery rates were higher in patients receiving thrombopoietin receptor agonists (81.8% vs. 60.9%) but were not higher in patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. CONCLUSIONS: TIAA occurs in <1% of patients receiving TMZ for CNS malignancies, but is highly morbid when it occurs and frequently fatal in the one-third of patients not achieving hematologic recovery. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists may improve the likelihood of a hematologic recovery.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of avatrombopag in immune thrombocytopenia: analyses of a phase III study and long-term extension.

Avatrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This is a post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III study (NCT01438840) evaluating additional endpoints not previously described. Thirty-two ITP patients were randomized to avatrombopag and 17 were randomized to placebo during a 26-week core study period (with 21 study visits), followed by an open-label extension period, in which all patients received avatrombopag for varying lengths of time. In this analysis, we evaluated previously unreported response rates at the study visit level, durability of response, and reduction in corticosteroid use with avatrombopag treatment. In the core study, more avatrombopag-treated patients achieved either response (Plt ≥50 000/µL) or complete response (Plt ≥100 000/µL) than placebo-treated patients by day 8 (65.6% vs. 0%; P < .0001 for response; 37.5% vs. 0%; P < .0001 for complete response), day 28 (84.4% vs. 0%; P < .0001 for response; 71.9% vs. 0%; P < .0001 for complete response), and month 6 (87.5% vs. 5.9%; P < .0001 for response; 81.3% vs. 5.9%; P < .0001 for complete response). Durable responders from the core study achieved response and complete response at 96.1% and 60.1% of extension phase visits, respectively. Durable clinically relevant response (Plt ≥30 000/µL for 6 of the final 8 weeks of the core study) occurred in 64.0% of avatrombopag-treated patients versus 0% of placebo-treated patients. More than half (57.1%) of patients on chronic corticosteroids reduced or discontinued corticosteroids. In conclusion, avatrombopag enabled most patients with ITP to achieve clinically meaningful and durable platelet count improvements.

Guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia para el manejo de trombocitopenia inmune primaria en población pediátrica / Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pediatric population

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common cause of thrombocytopenia in children, with a reported incidence of 1.1-12.5 cases per 100 000 children. However, currently, there are several definitions of ITP, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) to standardize the definition of ITP and, in this way, reduce the variability of its diagnosis, and to provide indications for the treatment of acute, persistent, and chronic ITP in patients under 18 years of age. The CPG was prepared by a multidisciplinary group that followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines for developing CPGs, formulated PICO clinical questions, and conducted systematic reviews. GRADE evidence profiles were created and recommendations, with their corresponding level of evidence and strength, were made after a panel of experts assessed the benefit-risk balance, the quality of evidence, the patients' values and preferences, and the context in which they should be implemented. A total of 23 recommendations were made to pediatricians, hematologists, and health professionals working in emergency services for treating acute, persistent, and chronic ITP. Overall, the CPG has low quality of evidence, and the recommendations were made in order to improve the success rate of ITP treatment and the prognosis of children with this condition. Although ITP is the main cause of thrombocytopenia in pediatrics, to date there is not enough high-quality evidence that supports the recommendations presented here for its proper classification and treatment in children. Thus, further studies providing high-quality evidence on this issue are required.

La púrpura trombocitopénica inmunológica (PTI) es la causa más frecuente de trombocitopenia en población pediátrica, con una incidencia de 1.1 a 12.5 casos por cada 100 000 niños. Sin embargo, en la actualidad hay diferentes definiciones de PTI, así como enfoques diagnósticos y terapéuticos. Desarrollar una guía de práctica clínica (GPC) basada en la evidencia para unificar las definiciones de PTI, y de esta forma reducir la variabilidad de su diagnóstico, y para proporcionar indicaciones para el tratamiento de la PTI aguda, persistente y crónica en pacientes menores de 18 años. La GPC fue desarrollada por un grupo multidisciplinario, el cual siguió las guías GRADE para la realización de GPC, formuló preguntas clínicas PICO y realizó revisiones sistemáticas. Se crearon perfiles de evidencia GRADE y se realizaron las recomendaciones, con su respectivo nivel de evidencia y fortaleza, luego de que un panel de expertos evaluara el equilibrio beneficio-riesgo, la calidad de la evidencia, las preferencias y valoraciones de los pacientes y el contexto en el que debieran implementarse. Se formularon 23 recomendaciones para el tratamiento de la PTI aguda, persistente y crónica dirigidas a pediatras, hematólogos y profesionales de la salud que trabajan en servicios de urgencias. En general, la evidencia de la guía es de baja calidad y las recomendaciones fueron formuladas para mejorar la tasa de éxito del tratamiento de la PTI y el pronóstico de estos pacientes. A pesar de que la PTI es la principal causa de trombocitopenia en población pediátrica, actualmente no hay suficiente evidencia de alta calidad que respalde las recomendaciones aquí presentadas para su adecuada clasificación y tratamiento en niños. Por lo anterior, se requiere realizar nuevos estudios que brinden evidencia de alta calidad en el tema.

Pre-procedural use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists in cirrhosis and severe thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis can preclude invasive procedures. Platelet transfusion is recommended if platelet count pre-procedure is potential alternative to platelet transfusion is thrombopoietin-receptor (TPO) agonists. AIM: Evaluate TPO-agonist efficacy and safety in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: Randomized control trials (RCT) from electronic reference databases were searched from inception till December 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Primary outcome was platelet transfusion avoidance. Secondary outcomes were weighted mean difference (WMD) in platelet count from baseline to pre-procedure and rates of major adverse events (AE). Pooled Odds Ratio (OR) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 1,229 patients were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Compared with placebo, those treated with TPO-agonists had a pooled OR of 0.12(0.08-0.17), P<0.01 for platelet transfusion avoidance, and WMD in platelet count (x10 3 /µL) of 35.6(28.6-42.7), P<0.01. Major AE did not differ between groups [Pooled OR: 0.87(0.47-1.62), P=0.66]. CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, TPO-agonists used in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia prior to elective invasive procedures had 88% reduced odds of requiring peri-procedural platelet transfusion and increased platelet count pre-procedure, with no difference in AE rates.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for acquired thrombocytopenia following anti-CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy: a case report.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cells targeting CD19 represent a promising therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) lymphoma and leukemia. The most common adverse events are immune related and include cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. However, early and late hematological toxicity has emerged as a substantial clinical hurdle leading among others to an increased risk for infections or bleeding. The underlying pathophysiology remains elusive and supportive measures comprise stem cell support or the use of growth factors. Here, we report a 66-year-old woman with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that received anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells achieving a complete metabolic remission. At month 3 after adoptive cell transfer, the patient still exhibited a grade 3 anemia and a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The latter required regular platelet transfusions. Bone marrow smear revealed hypocellularity without dysplasia. Despite reduced megakaryopoiesis, immature platelet fraction was elevated indicating an at least partially consumptive underlying component. Based on the successful use of Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin receptor-agonist, in aplastic anemia and immune thrombocytopenia, we treated our patient accordingly. Platelet count (and hemoglobin levels) increased and the patient remains transfusion-free. Taken together, our therapeutic approach could represent a novel strategy for managing CAR-T-cell-related hematotoxicity but, self-evidently, requires further controlled clinical studies.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Previous meta-analyses reported discordant results on the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) as second-line treatment in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a meta-analysis of primary ITP treatment with the TPO-RA Romiplostim, Eltrombopag and Avatrombopag, including additional studies and relevant endpoints. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on TPO-RA in ITP published until December 31, 2018. The primary endpoints were: risk ratio (RR) of treatment failure and bleeding of WHO grade ≥2; rate of remission after discontinuation of treatment. The principal safety outcome was RR and incidence of thrombotic events and liver damage. From 1044 identified records we selected 16 RCTs and 19 cohort studies. RCTs included 909 patients assigned to TPO-RA and 427 to the control arm. Treatment failure was observed in 21% TPO-RA-treated patients and 47% control arm patients (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53) in RCTs during a median follow-up of 13 weeks, and in 29% TPO-RA-treated patients in cohort studies, during a median follow-up of 69 weeks. The incidence of remission after TPO discontinuation was 18% (5-36%). RR of WHO grade ≥2 bleeding was 0.58 (0.38-0.86) in TPO-RA-treated patients, compared to control arm patients. Adverse events were rare and not significantly different in the two groups of patients. All-cause mortality was significantly lower with TPO-RA (RR 0.21, 95% CI, 0.06-0.68). In conclusion, TPO-RA are effective and safe in patients with ITP, even in the long term.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Thrombocytopenia is one of the most common hematologic complications in cirrhosis. Despite limited data linking platelet count and bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis, the use of platelets transfusions for invasive procedures has been a common practice. Recently, thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists have been approved for use in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to review current literature on bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis and the use of platelet transfusions and TPO receptor agonists in the context of invasive procedures. PubMed search was conducted to find articles relating to cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, and new novel treatments for this condition. Search terms included CLD, cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, bleeding, thrombosis, coagulopathy, hemostasis, and TPO receptor agonists. Romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag are approved TPO receptor agonists, with avatrombopag and lusutrombopag specifically approved for use in patients with CLD undergoing invasive procedures. In patients with platelet counts < 50,000/mm3, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag increased the platelet counts above this threshold in the majority of treated patients and reduced the frequency of platelet transfusions. At the approved doses, incidence of thrombosis was not increased and therapies were well tolerated. Studies were not powered to assess whether risk of bleeding complications was reduced and the fundamental question of whether correction of thrombocytopenia is warranted in patients undergoing invasive procedures remains unanswered. The use of TPO receptor agonists has resulted in less requirement for platelet transfusions. In patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive procedures for whom platelet transfusion is planned, TPO receptor agonists are an alternative and avoid the risks associated with transfusions. However, there is need for a thoughtful approach to manage bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing procedures, with the consideration of a comprehensive hemostatic profile, the severity of portal hypertension, and the complexity of the invasive procedure to guide decisions regarding transfusions or use of TPO receptor agonists.

Agonistas del receptor de trombopoyetina (Eltrompopag) para la púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática crónica en adultos y niños / Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (Eltrompopag) for chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults and children

TECNOLOGÍA EVALUADA: Eltrombopag. DESCRIPCION DE LA INTERVENCIÓN: Eltrombopag (Revolade, GlaxoSmithKline) aumenta la producción de plaquetas activando el receptor de trombopoyetina, estimulando así la producción de plaquetas y reduciendo el sangrado. Eltrombopag tiene una autorización de comercialización de ANMAT para tratamiento de 'púrpura trombocitopénica inmune crónica (idiopática) (PTI) en pacientes de 1 año o más que son refractarios a otros tratamientos (p. ej. corticosteroides, inmunoglobulinas y esplenectomía). BUSQUEDA BIBLIOGRÁFICA: Se realizaron búsquedas en MEDLINE (desde 1950 hasta marzo de 2011), EMBASE (desde 1974 hasta marzo de 2019), y en el Registro Cochrane Central de Ensayos Controlados (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library 2011, Número 3), para identificar todos los metaanálisis y ensayos con asignación aleatoria sobre la PTI crónica. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron seis ensayos con 808 pacientes. Cinco estudios compararon los agonistas de receptores de TPO con placebo (romiplostim: 100, eltrombopag: 299, placebo: 175); un estudio comparó los agonistas de receptores de TPO con la atención estándar (AE) (romiplostim: 157; AE: 77). La AE incluyó una variedad de tratamientos, como glucocorticoide, inmunoglobulina anti-D, inmunoglobulina intravenosa, rituximab, azatioprina, etcétera. La supervivencia general, una de nuestras medidas de resultado primarias, no fue estudiada por estos ECAs y no fue posible calcular el número necesario a tratar (NNT). Otra medida de resultado primaria, la mejoría en los eventos de hemorragia significativa, no reveló ninguna diferencia significativa entre el grupo de agonistas de receptores de TPO y el grupo de control (placebo o AE) (versus cociente de riesgos [CR] del placebo 0,48, intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 0,20 a 1,15; versus CR de la AE 0,49, IC del 95%: 0,15 a 1,63). En cuanto a las medidas de resultado secundarias, los agonistas de receptores de TPO mejoraron de forma estadísticamente significativa la respuesta plaquetaria general (versus CR del placebo 4,06, IC del 95%: 2,93 a 5,63; versus CR de la AE 1,81, IC del 95%: 1,37 a 2,37), la respuesta completa (versus CR del placebo 9,29; IC del 95%: 2,32 a 37,15) y la respuesta duradera (versus CR del placebo 14,16; IC del 95%: 2,91 a 69,01). Hubo una reducción significativa en los eventos de hemorragia general (grado 1 a 4 de la OMS) en comparación con el placebo (CR 0,78; IC del 95%: 0,68 a 0,89), pero no en comparación con la AE (CR 0,97; IC del 95%: 0,75 a 1,26). EXPLICACIONES: Funded by drug company. There is evidence that industry-sponsored trials may overestimatethetreatmenteffect(Bhandari 2004). Los intervalos de confianza son amplios e incluyen no efecto. Estudio que evaluó intervención con Romiplostin.