Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we present the unique case of a patient with knee osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency who underwent simultaneous medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and PCL reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old male patient presented with a 1-year history of pain and instability in the left knee. The patient had previously experienced a trauma-related injury to the PCL of the left knee that was left untreated. Imaging and physical examination confirmed the presence of left medial knee OA along with PCL rupture. To address these issues, the patient underwent UKA combined with PCL reconstruction. The patient's Lysholm score was 47 before surgery and 81 three months after surgery, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 29 before surgery and 18 three months after surgery, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score was 56.3 before surgery and 74.7 three months after surgery. Six months after surgery, the patient's gait returned to normal, and he was able to jog. CONCLUSION: This case report presents the first instance of UKA combined with PCL reconstruction and introduces a novel treatment approach for patients suffering from medial knee OA and ligament injury.

Clinical efficacy and kinematic analysis of Chinese knotting technique-assisted posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective analysis.

To investigate the clinical efficacy and knee joint kinematic changes of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction assisted by Chinese knotting technique (CKT). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 cases of PCL reconstructive surgery admitted between September 2016 and September 2020. All patients were operated on by the same senior doctor and his team. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the CKT was applied, with 44 cases in each group. Both groups received active rehabilitation treatment after surgery. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years. International knee documentation committee, hospital for special surgery (HSS), and Lysholm scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the 2 methods at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The motion cycle and kinematic indices of the knee joint were measured by the Opti_Knee three-dimensional motion measurement system before surgery and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. A secondary arthroscopic examination was performed at 12 months after surgery, MAS score was used to evaluate the secondary endoscopic examination of PCL. All the patients had wound healing in stage I without infection. International Knee in both sets Documentation Committee scores, HSS scores and Lysholm scores were gradually improved at all time points (P < .05); compared with the traditional group, the HSS score was higher in the reduction group 12 months after surgery (P < .05), but there was no significant difference at 24 months after surgery. 12 months and 24 months after 3 dimensional motion measurement system using Opti_Knee showed a reduction group before and after displacement and displacement of upper and lower range than the traditional group (P < 0. 05). One year after surgery, the good and good rate of MAS score reduction group was higher than traditional group. CKT assisted PCL reconstruction can improve the subjective function score of the affected knee joint and the results of secondary microscopy. Satisfactory knee kinematic function can be obtained in the early stage, and the anteroposteric relaxation of the knee joint can be reduced.

Anatomic versus Low Tibial Tunnel in Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

There is currently no consensus on the optimal placement of the tibial tunnel for double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of double-bundle PCL reconstruction utilizing anatomic versus low tibial tunnels. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent double-bundle PCL reconstruction between Jan 2019 and Jan 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (n = 36). Based on the tibial tunnel position on postoperative computed tomography, patients were categorized into two groups: anatomic placement (group A; n = 18) and low tunnel placement (group L; n = 18). We compared the range of motion, stability test, complications, and side-to-side differences in tibial posterior translation using kneeling stress radiography between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding clinical outcomes or complication rates. No significant differences in the posterior drawer test and side-to-side difference on kneeling stress radiography (2.5 ± 1.2 mm in group A vs. 3.7 ± 2.0 mm in group L; p = 0.346). In conclusion, the main findings of this study indicate that both anatomic tunnel and low tibial tunnel placements in double-bundle PCL reconstruction demonstrated comparable and satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes, with similar overall complication rates at the 2-year follow-up.

Peracetic acid sterilized tendon and ligament allografts for knee reconstruction : For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and complex knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: The use of allografts and autografts has been met with mixed views on whether allografts are a suitable alternative to autografts. QUESTION: We aimed to investigate if chemically sterilized allografts show similar rerupture rates to those reported in the literature for allografts and autografts in anterior (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligaments (PCL) and complex knee surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data on knee reconstructions performed between 2011 and 2015 with tendon/ligamnet allografts sterilized with peracetic acid were collected in the form of a questionnaire. The inclusion criteria of 2 years for each patient were met by 38 patients, representing 22 ACL reconstructions, 5 PCL reconstructions, 3 OTHER surgeries, including the Larson technique and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and 8 COMPLEX surgeries. The main endpoints were rerupture and complication rate. Secondary endpoints included stability of the knee (Lachman test, Pivot shift test) and the range of motion. RESULTS: The rerupture rate was 7.9% (3 grafts). Reruptures only occurred in the ACL group. No reruptures were observed in the PCL, OTHER and COMPLEX surgery groups. Stability improved significantly after surgery and the range of motion returned to values similar to that of healthy knees. CONCLUSIONS: Tendon allografts sterilized with peracetic acid show promising low rerupture rates and good clinical scores and the results are comparable to the literature on autografts and other allografts.

Outcomes after Anatomic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Transtibial and Tibial Inlay Techniques.

Surgical reconstruction is recommended for symptomatic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency. While anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) has been reported to be associated with biomechanical and clinical advantages over other methods, there is still debate regarding the optimal technique for tibial positioning and fixation. Based on reported advantages and disadvantages, we employed two tibial fixation techniques, transtibial (TT) and tibial inlay (TI) for anatomic double-bundle PCLR with technique selection based on body mass index, comorbidities, and primary versus revision surgery. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following PCLR utilizing either TT or TI techniques to validate relative advantages, disadvantages, and indications for each based on the review of prospectively collected registry data. For 37 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 26 underwent arthroscopic TT PCLR using all-soft- tissue allograft with suspensory fixation in the tibia and 11 patients underwent open TI PCLR using an allograft with calcaneal bone block and screw fixation in the tibia. There were no significant preoperative differences between cohorts. Success rates were 96% for TT and 91% for TI with all successful cases documented to be associated with good-to-excellent posterior stability and range of motion in the knee at the final follow-up. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores were within clinically meaningful ranges for pain, function, and mental health after PCLR in both cohorts, suggesting similarly favorable functional, social, and psychological outcomes. Patient-reported pain scores at 6 months postoperatively were significantly (p = 0.042) lower in the TT cohort, which was the only statistically significant difference in outcomes noted. The results of this study support the use of TT and TI techniques for double-bundle anatomic PCLR in restoring knee stability and patient function when used for the treatment of isolated and multiligamentous PCL injuries. The choice between tibial fixation methods for PCLR can be appropriately based on patient and injury characteristics that optimize respective advantages for each technique.

Effect of Posterior Tibial Slopes on Graft Survival Rates at 10 Years After Primary Single-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Recent biomechanical studies have reported that stress on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) graft increases as the posterior tibial slope (PTS) decreases (flattened) in knees with single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle PCL reconstruction. Clinical studies of SB PCL reconstruction have shown that a flattened PTS is associated with a lesser reduction in posterior tibial translation. There is no long-term study on the clinical outcomes and graft survival rates of SB PCL reconstruction based on the medial and lateral PTSs measured on magnetic resonance imaging. HYPOTHESIS: Flattened medial and lateral PTSs are associated with poor clinical outcomes and graft survival rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after SB PCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In this cohort study, we retrospectively reviewed 46 patients (mean age, 28.8 ± 9.9 years) who underwent primary SB PCL reconstruction between 2000 and 2009. They were followed up for a minimum of 10 years. The medial and lateral PTSs were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. As a previous study reported that a steeper medial or lateral PTS showed a higher risk of anterior tibial translation at thresholds of 5.6° and 3.8°, respectively, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on the cutoff values of both the medial (≤5.6° vs >5.6°) and lateral (≤3.8° vs >3.8°) PTSs. Clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score), radiological outcomes (side-to-side difference [SSD] on stress radiography and osteoarthritis progression), and graft survival rates were compared between the groups at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All clinical scores and the progression of osteoarthritis demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 subgroups of both the medial and lateral PTS groups. The mean SSD on stress radiography after SB PCL reconstruction was significantly greater in patients with a medial PTS ≤5.6° than in patients with a medial PTS >5.6° (8.4 ± 3.9 vs 5.1 ± 2.9 mm, respectively; P = .030), while the lateral PTS subgroups after SB PCL reconstruction demonstrated no significant difference. The minimum 10-year graft survival rate was significantly lower in patients with a medial PTS ≤5.6° (68.4% vs 92.6%, respectively; P = .029) and a lateral PTS ≤3.8° (50.0% vs 91.7%, respectively; P = .001). CONCLUSION: A flattened medial PTS (≤5.6°) was associated with an increased SSD on stress radiography, and both flattened medial (≤5.6°) and lateral (≤3.8°) PTSs resulted in lower graft survival rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after primary SB PCL reconstruction.

A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes Comparing Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction techniques have historically focused on single-bundle (SB) reconstruction of the larger anterolateral bundle without addressing the codominant posteromedial bundle. The SB technique has been associated with residual laxity and instability, leading to the development of double-bundle (DB) reconstruction techniques. PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of comparative clinical and biomechanical studies to differentiate the pooled outcomes of SB and DB PCL reconstruction cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis and systematic review: Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Six databases were queried in February 2022 for literature directly comparing clinical and biomechanical outcomes for patients or cadaveric specimens undergoing DB PCL reconstruction against SB PCL reconstruction. Biomechanical outcomes included posterior tibial translational laxity, external rotational laxity, and varus laxity at 30° and 90° of knee flexion. Clinical outcomes included the side-to-side difference in posterior tibial translation during postoperative stress radiographs, risk of a major complication, and the following postoperative patient-reported outcome measures: Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores. A random-effects model was used to compare pooled clinical and biomechanical outcomes between the cohorts. RESULTS: Fifteen biomechanical studies and 13 clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis. The DB group demonstrated significantly less posterior tibial translation at 30° and 90° of knee flexion (P < .00001). Additionally, the DB group demonstrated significantly less external rotation laxity at 90° of knee flexion (P = .0002) but not at 30° of knee flexion (P = .33). There was no difference in varus laxity between the groups at 30° (P = .56) or 90° (P = .24) of knee flexion. There was significantly less translation on stress radiographs in the DB group (P = .02). Clinically, there was no significant difference between the groups for the Lysholm score (P = .95), Tegner score (P = .14), or risk of a major complication (P = .93). DB PCL reconstruction led to significantly higher odds of achieving "normal" or "near normal" objective IKDC outcomes for the included prospective studies (P = .04) and higher subjective IKDC scores (P = .01). CONCLUSION: DB PCL reconstruction leads to superior biomechanical outcomes and clinical outcomes relative to SB PCL reconstruction. Re-creating native anatomy during PCL reconstruction maximizes biomechanical stability and clinical outcomes.

Biomechanical comparison of proximal, distal, and anatomic tibial tunnel for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

No consensus has been reached on the optimal position of PCL tibial tunnel. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of proximal, distal and anatomic tibial tunnel in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in-vitro model of transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was simulated using porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons. Two models of biomechanical testing, load-to-failure loading, and cyclic loading, were performed in this study. The load-to-failure loading found that distal tibial tunnel resulted in greater ultimate load and yield load than the anatomic and proximal tunnel group (p < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences in mean tensile stiffness among three groups (p > 0.05). The cyclic loading found no differences in the graft displacement at 250, 500, and 1000 cycles among three groups (p > 0.05). It was found that distal tibial tunnel showed superior ultimate load and yield load in load-to-failure loading testing compared with proximal and anatomic tibial tunnels, whereas no significant difference was found in terms of the mean displacement of the survived grafts in cyclic loading testing among three groups.

An Anatomically Placed Tibial Tunnel does not Completely Surround a Simulated PCL Reconstruction Graft in the Proximal Tibia.

INTRODUCTION: It is hypothesized that anatomic tunnel placement will create tunnels with violation of the posterior cortex and subsequently an oblique aperture that is not circumferentially surrounded by bone. In this article, we aimed to characterize posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) model. METHODS: Ten normal knee CTs with the patella, femur, and fibula removed were used. Simulated 11 mm PCL tibial tunnels were created at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees. The morphology of the posterior proximal tibial exit was examined with 3D modeling software. The length of tunnel not circumferentially covered (cortex violation) was measured to where the tibial tunnel became circumferential. The surface area and volume of the cylinder both in contact with the tibial bone and that not in contact with the tibia were determined. The percentages of the stick-out length surface area and volume not in contact with bone were calculated. RESULTS: The mean stick-out length of uncovered graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 26.3, 20.5, 17.3, and 12.7 mm, respectively. The mean volume of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 840.8, 596.2, 425.6, and 302.9 mm3, respectively. The mean percent of volume of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 32, 29, 25, and 24%, respectively. The mean surface of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 372.2, 280.4, 208.8, and 153.3 mm2, respectively. The mean percent of surface area of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 40, 39, 34, and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anatomic tibial tunnel creation using standard transtibial PCL reconstruction techniques consistently risks posterior tibial cortex violation and creation of an oblique aperture posteriorly. This risk is decreased with decreasing the angle of the tibial tunnel, though the posterior cortex is still compromised with angles as low as 40 degrees. With posterior cortex violation, a surgeon should be aware that a graft within the tunnel or socket posteriorly may not be fully in contact with bone. This is especially relevant with inlay and socket techniques.

3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes.

OBJECTIVE: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, surgeons commonly pay more attention to the graft turning angle in the sagittal plane (GASP), but the graft turning angle in the coronal plane (GACP) is always neglected. This study hypothesized that the three-dimensional (3D) killer turn angle was determined by both the GASP and GACP, and aimed to quantitively analyze the effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle. METHODS: This was an in-vitro computer simulation study of transtibial PCL reconstruction using 3D knee models. Patients with knee injuries who were CT scanned were selected from the CT database (April 2019 to January 2021) at a local hospital for reviewing. A total of 60 3D knees were simulated based on the knees' CT data. The femoral and tibial PCL attachment were located on the 3D knee model using the Rhinoceros software. The tibial tunnels were simulated based on different GASP and GACP. The effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle were quantitatively analyzed. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes in different groups. The regression analysis was performed to identify variables of the GASP and GACP which significantly affected 3D killer turn angle. RESULTS: The 3D killer turn angle showed a significant proportional relationship not only with the GASP (r2 > 0.868, P < 0.001), but also with the GACP (r2 > 0.467, P < 0.001). Every 10° change of the GACP caused 2.8° to 4.4° change of the 3D killer turn angle, whereas every 10° change of the GASP caused 6.4° to 9.2° change of the 3D killer turn angle. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D killer turn angle was significantly affected by both the GASP and GACP. During the transtibial PCL reconstruction, the proximal anterolateral tibial tunnel approach could increase the 3D killer turn angle more obviously compared with the most distal anteromedial tibial tunnel approach. To minimize the killer turn effect, both the GASP and GACP were required to be considered to increase.

Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) synthetic graft for PCL reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Several strategies are available for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. SOURCE OF DATA: Recently published literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: The Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) is a scaffold type artificial ligament, which has been widely used for ligament reconstruction of the knee. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Current evidence on the reliability and feasibility of LARS for primary isolated PCL reconstruction is limited. GROWING POINTS: The primary outcome of interest of the present work was to investigate the outcomes of PCL reconstruction using the LARS. The secondary outcome of interest was to compare the LARS versus four-strand hamstring tendon (4SHT) autograft for PCL reconstruction. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: LARS for primary isolated PCL reconstruction seems to be effective and safe, with results comparable to the 4SHT autograft.

Comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution in total knee arthroplasty during gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To compare the gait patterns between posterior cruciate retention and substitution in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Electronic databases including the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify clinical trials investigating posterior cruciate retention versus substitution in TKA. The outcome measurements were the kinematic gait parameters (flexion at heel strike, maximum flexion during loading response, flexion range during loading, minimal flexion at terminal stance, maximal flexion at the swing, and total flexion during the gait cycle), Knee Society Score (KSS), knee flexion, knee extension, and walking speed. Statistical software Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14.0 were used for data analysis. RESULTS: There were finally 9 studies included in this meta-analysis. The results did not reveal differences between posterior cruciate retention (CR) and posterior cruciate substitution (PS) groups in TKA, in terms of kinematic gait parameters, knee extension, walking speed, and KSS. However, the PS group had a significantly larger knee flexion angle than that in the CR group [weighted mean difference = - 3.20, 95% CI - 6.13 to - 0.28, P = 0.03]. CONCLUSION: Both the posterior cruciate retention and posterior cruciate substitution lead to obvious improvements in patient function and have their advantages in getting a good cup position. The PS design is significantly better on the knee flexion, while there are no statistical differences in kinematic gait parameters and outcome scores between them. This might indicate that surgeons do not necessarily need a PS design to substitute the posterior cruciate ligament during TKA.

Single versus double bundle in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction can be performed using single bundle (SB) and double bundle (DB) techniques. The present study investigated whether DB PCL reconstruction is superior to SB reconstruction in terms of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and joint stability. In December 2021 Embase, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Scopus databases were accessed. All clinical trials comparing SB versus DB reconstruction to address PCL insufficiency in skeletally mature patients were considered. Data from 483 procedures were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 31.0 (28.0 to 107.6) months, and the mean timespan between injury and surgery was 11.3 (6 to 37) months. The mean age of the patients was 29.3 ± 3.8 years. 85 of 483 patients (18%) were women. At a mean of 31.0 months post reconstruction, ROM (P = 0.03) was slightly greater in the SB group, while the Tegner score (P = 0.03) and the Telos stress (P = 0.04) were more favorable in the DB cohort. Similarity was found in instrumental laxity (P = 0.4) and Lysholm score (P = 0.3). The current evidence does not support the use of DB techniques for PCL reconstruction. Both methods could restore knee stability and motion with satisfactory short term patient reported outcome measures. Further high quality clinical trials are required to validate these results on a larger scale.

Single and double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield comparable clinical and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and compare the functional and objective outcomes after single-bundle (SB) vs. double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR). Where possible to pool outcomes and arrive at summary estimates of treatment effect for DB PCLR vs. SB PCLR via an embedded meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) literature search identified 13 eligible studies evaluating clinical outcomes of both techniques for PCLR. Clinical outcome measures included in the meta-analysis were functional outcomes (Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale) and objective measurements of posterior laxity of the operated knee (arthrometer and stress radiographs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 603 patients. Three hundred and fifteen patients were treated with SB and two hundred and eighty-eight patients with DB PCLR. There were no significant differences between SB and DB PCLR in postoperative functional Lysholm Scores (CI [- 0.18, 0.17]), Tegner Activity Scales (CI [- 0.32, 0.12]) and IKDC objective grades (CI [- 0.13, 1.17]). Regarding posterior stability using KT-1000 and Kneelax III arthrometer measurements, there were no differences between the SB and DB group. However, double-bundle reconstruction provided better objective outcome of measurement of posterior laxity (CI [0.02, 0.46]) when measured with Telos stress radiography. CONCLUSION: A systematic review was conducted to identify current best evidence pertaining to DB and SB PCLR. An embedded meta-analysis arrived at similar summary estimates of treatment effect for motion, stability and overall function for both techniques. There is no demonstrable clinically relevant difference between techniques based on the currently available evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The treatment of posterolateral knee instability with combined arthroscopic popliteus bypass and PCL reconstruction provides good-to-excellent clinical results in the mid-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated with an arthroscopic popliteus bypass (PB) technique, in cases of a posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI) and a concomitant posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury of the knee. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series in which 23 patients were clinically evaluated after a minimum of 2 years following arthroscopic PB and combined PCL reconstruction. Lysholm, Tegner and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores as well as visual analog scales (VAS) for joint function and pain were evaluated. Posterior laxity was objectified with stress radiography and a Rolimeter examination. Rotational instability was graded with the dial test. RESULTS: 23 patients were available for follow-up, 46.0 ± 13.6 months after surgery. The median time interval from the initial injury to the surgery was 6.0 (3.5;10.5) months. The postoperative Lysholm Score was 95.0 (49-100); the Tegner Score changed from 6.0 (3-10) before the injury to 5.0 (0-10) at the follow-up examination (p = 0.013). The side-to-side difference on stress radiography (SSD) of posterior translation changed from 10.4 (6.6-14.8) mm before the injury to 4.0 (0.2-5.7) mm postoperatively (p < 0.01). Rotational instability was reduced to grade A (82.6%) or B (17.4%) (IKDC). The Rolimeter SSD was 2.0 (0-3) mm at the follow-up examination. VAS Function 0 (0-5), VAS pain 0 (0-6). CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic PB graft technique provided good-to-excellent clinical results in the mid-term follow-up in patients with type A PLRI and concomitant PCL injury. However, an exact differentiation of lateral, rotational and dorsal instabilities of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries is crucial, for the correct choice of therapy, as cases with lateral instabilities require more complex reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction is a safe procedure with a high success rate in the mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Isolated Partial Femoral Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the manifestation, mechanisms, and treatment of isolated partial femoral avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in adults. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2018, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of three patients with isolated partial femoral avulsion fractures of the PCL who were admitted to our institution. All of these patients were admitted to our emergency department within 24 h after injury. After physical examination and radiographs were taken and reviewed, all patients were admitted and underwent surgical treatment. In a 26-year-old man who underwent arthroscopic surgery through the traditional medial and lateral approach before finally converting to open surgery with the posterior approach, the fragment that was finally removed was partially attached to the PCL. In the other two patients, women aged 63 and 68 years, who underwent arthroscopic surgery via the traditional medial and lateral approach, the fragments were large and attached to most fibers of the PCL. We fixed the fragments using hollow screws in arthroscopic view. In addition, in the 63-year-old patient, an anchor was embedded to restore the tension of the PCL. Four weeks after surgery, the patients started to wear long leg braces in full extension with the tibia blocked up by cushion. Physical examinations were conducted and radiographs were taken preoperatively and at 4 weeks and 3 months after surgery to evaluate the condition of the injury. The range of motion and the Lysholm knee scoring scale for the knee joint were compared before and after the surgery. RESULTS: For the three patients, the radiographs taken at 3 months postoperatively showed that the fixation of the screws did not fail, and the subchondral bone was generally normal compared to the preoperative radiographs. CT scanning at 3 months after surgery showed that the fracture healed in the original position of the avulsion site. For all patients, the affected knees presented as stable at physical examination 3 months after surgery; the Lachmann test and the anterior drawer test results were negative. In addition, the flexion-extension, internal rotation, and external rotation were approximately 0°-130°, 0°-30°, and 0°-40° in the 26-year-old patient, respectively. The flexion-extension, internal rotation, and external rotation were approximately 0°-100°, 0°-20°, and 0°-35° for the 63-year-old patient, respectively. The flexion-extension, internal rotation, and external rotation were approximately 0°-100°, 0°-15°, and 0°-20° for the 68-year-old patient, respectively. There was no pain or only little pain 3 months after surgery. There was no swelling or discomfort at the 3-month follow up. The Lysholm knee scores of the 68-year-old, 63-year-old, and 26-year-old patient were 80, 87, and 95 at 3 months after surgery, respectively, which were obviously improved postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The manifestation of isolated partial femoral avulsion fractures of the PCL in adults is often related to the injury mechanism, and surgery is essential for the treatment of these patients. Most of these fractures can be repaired by arthroscopic surgery, but some have to be treated by open surgery.

The use of the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and multiligament knee injuries: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in isolated PCL injuries and multiligament knee injuries, analysing clinical, radiographic, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed through Embase via Ovid, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies reviewing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: From 225 results screened, 13 studies were included published between 2004 and 2020, analysing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 21 months to 11.9 years, however only four studies had follow-up of over five years. Results in isolated PCL reconstruction utilising LARS demonstrated scores that were consistent with good function and minimal limitation in daily or sporting activities, in addition to a significant improvement in knee laxity and low complication rates. Symptomatic rupture and synovitis rates were both 1.7% in this group. LARS use in complex multiligament injuries demonstrated satisfactory PROMs, although there was concern regarding residual laxity on stress radiography. CONCLUSIONS: LARS demonstrates good outcomes in PCL injury reconstruction in the short to mid-term, particularly in isolated PCL injuries, achieving equivocal or improved results compared to autograft reconstruction using hamstring tendon in the three comparative studies included. LARS has a quicker recovery time and no donor-site morbidity, however long-term data is lacking. Utilising LARS for reconstruction of the PCL in multiligament injuries revealed more variable results.

No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the optimal treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) -based multi-ligamentous injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective and objective clinical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction and tibial inlay reconstruction. METHODS: From 2005 to 2013, a total of 135 patients with PCL-based multi-ligamentous injuries were consecutively identified. Patients were operated with the arthroscopic transtibial technique or the open tibial inlay technique group. Other injured structures were reconstructed or repaired simultaneously. All of the patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative physical examination, KT-1000 measurement, stress radiography under anesthesia and subjective evaluations including Tegner score, Lysholm score, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) score. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (64.8%) underwent arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstruction, and 31 patients (35.2%) underwent PCL reconstruction with the tibial inlay technique. The average follow up period was 45.9 ± 17.0 months (24-77 months). At the final follow up, for the arthroscopic transtibial group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.5 ± 4.8 mm to 2.4 ± 3.4 mm (P < 0.001); the tibial posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 7.1 mm to 4.6 ± 4.0 mm (P < 0.001). For the open inlay group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.7 ± 5.2 mm to 2.2 ± 3.6 mm (P < 0.001) and the posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 5.9 mm to 4.3 ± 3.9 mm (P < 0.001) at the final follow up. The inter-group clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively were not significantly different at any time point. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in objective and subjective outcome between the arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay PCL reconstruction in patients with multi-ligamentous injuries.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are often encountered in the setting of other knee pathology and sometimes in isolation. A thorough understanding of the native PCL anatomy is crucial in the successful treatment of these injuries. The PCL consists of two independent bundles that function in a codominant relationship to perform the primary role of resisting posterior tibial translation relative to the femur. A secondary role of the PCL is to provide rotatory stability. The anterolateral (AL) bundle has a more vertical orientation when compared with the posteromedial (PM) bundle. The AL bundle has a more anterior origin than the PM bundle on the lateral wall of the medial femoral condyle. The tibial insertion of AL bundle on the PCL facet is medial and anterior to the PM bundle. The AL and PM bundles are 12-mm apart at the center of the femoral origins, while the tibial insertions are more tightly grouped. The different spatial orientation of the two bundles and large distance between the femoral centers is responsible for the codominance of the PCL bundles. The AL bundle is the dominant restraint to posterior tibial translation throughout midrange flexion, while the PM bundle is the primary restraint in extension and deep flexion. Biomechanical testing has shown independent reconstruction of the two bundles that better reproduces native knee biomechanics, while significant differences in clinical outcomes remain to be seen. Stress X-rays may play an important role in clinical decision-making process for operative versus nonoperative management of isolated PCL injuries. Strong understanding of PCL anatomy and biomechanics can aid surgical management.

Complications Associated with Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Avoiding Them.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries often occur as part of a multiligament injury pattern and can present a significant challenge to the treating surgeon. When PCL reconstruction is indicated, complications can arise in the intraoperative and postoperative period that lead to poor outcomes. These complications include neurovascular injury, fracture, compartment syndrome, persistent posterior laxity, motion loss, residual knee pain, osteonecrosis, and heterotopic ossification. The purpose of this review is to highlight complications associated with PCL reconstruction and strategies to avoid them.