The Impact of Donor-Recipient Human Leukocyte Antigen Matching on Bronchiolitis Obliterans-Free Survival Among Lung Transplant Recipients With Connective Tissue Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The development of connective tissue disease-associated lung diseases (CTD-LD) occurs in association with specific human leukocyte antigens (HLA). For CTD-LD patients who require lung transplant, it is unknown whether utilization of donor organs expressing these same HLA impacts posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we assessed whether CTD-LD lung transplant recipients in the United States have worse bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS)-free survival based on the degree of donor HLA matching. This included overall degree of donor-recipient HLA matching, donor-recipient matching at DR loci, and recipient matching with specific donor HLA antigens associated with the development of pulmonary disease in their condition. RESULTS: Among 1413 patients with CTD-ILD, highly HLA-matched donor-recipients did not have worse adjusted survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.51, p = 0.77). Recipients who were fully matched at HLA DR did not have worse survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.56-1.19, p = 0.29). Finally, among individual CTD-LD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and systemic lupus erythematous, transplant with a donor expressing HLA antigens associated with lung manifestations in these conditions was not associated with worse BOS-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Among transplant recipients with CTD-LD, HLA donor-recipient matching, including at the DR loci, does not result in worse BOS-free survival. Based on these findings, there is no reason to treat these as unacceptable antigens when considering donor offers for CTD-LD candidates.

Contemporary Immunosuppression Management and 1-Year Outcomes in Dual Organ Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There have been limited reports on immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant populations, primarily from before the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change. Recent data suggested that outcomes with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants remained comparable in the new allocation era, yet heart-kidney recipients have worse 1-year survival. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated adult heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-lung transplant recipients from September 2019 to May 2023. Immunosuppression regimen, infectious complications, and graft outcomes were collected for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (kidney n = 20, liver n = 9, and lung n = 7) were included in this study. Basiliximab was the most commonly employed induction strategy across the organ groups (12/20 in kidney, 4/9 in liver, and 7/7 in lung). All patients were on triple immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant with prednisone wean achieved in one heart-liver recipient. Infection complications were frequently reported (95% kidney, 75% liver, 100% lung group). One patient went back to dialysis due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. One chronic lung allograft dysfunction was reported, but no other severe biopsy-proven rejection or retransplant was reported. The 1-year survival was 85% (17/20) in heart-kidney, 78% (7/9) in heart-liver, and 86% (6/7) in heart-lung recipients. CONCLUSION: This study summarized real-world immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant recipients.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease Following Pancreas Transplantation: A 40 Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Chronic immunosuppression following pancreas transplantation carries significant risk, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). We sought to define the incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes of PTLD following pancreas transplantation at a single center. METHODS: All adult pancreas transplants between February 1, 1983 and December 31, 2023 at the University of Minnesota were reviewed, including pancreas transplant alone (PTA), simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK), and pancreas after kidney transplants (PAK). RESULTS: Among 2353 transplants, 110 cases of PTLD were identified, with an overall incidence of 4.8%. 17.3% were diagnosed within 1 year of transplant, 32.7% were diagnosed within 5 years, and 74 (67.3%) were diagnosed after 5 years. The overall 30-year incidence of PTLD did not differ by transplant type-7.4% for PTA, 14.2% for SPK, and 19.4% for PAK (p = 0.3). In multivariable analyses, older age and Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity were risk factors for PTLD, and PTLD was a risk factor for patient death. PTLD-specific mortality was 32.7%, although recipients with PTLD had similar median posttransplant survival compared to those without PTLD (14.9 year vs. 15.6 year, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: PTLD following pancreas transplantation is associated with significant mortality. Although the incidence of PTLD has decreased over time, a high index of suspicion for PTLD following PTx should remain in EBV-negative recipients.

Impact of Age of Heart Transplant Program on Patient Survival and Post-Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between age of a heart transplant (HT) program and outcomes has not been explored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database of all adult HTs between 2009 and 2019. For each patient, we created a variable that corresponded to program age: new (<5), developing (≥5 but <10) and established (≥10) years. RESULTS: Of 20 997 HTs, 822 were at new, 908 at developing, and 19 267 at established programs. Patients at new programs were significantly more likely to have history of cigarette smoking, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and prior sternotomy. These programs were less likely to accept organs from older donors and those with a history of hypertension or cigarette use. As compared to patients at new programs, transplant patients at established programs had less frequent rates of treated rejection during the index hospitalization (HR 0.43 [95% CI, 0.36-0.53] p < 0.001) and at 1 year (HR 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.70], p < 0.001), less frequently required pacemaker implantations (HR 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.69], p < 0.001), and less frequently required dialysis (HR 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82], p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in short- or long-term survival between the groups (log-rank p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Patient and donor selection differed between new, developing, and established HT programs but had equivalent survival. New programs had increased likelihood of treated rejection, pacemaker implantation, and need for dialysis. Standardized post-transplant practices may help to minimize this variation and ensure optimal outcomes for all patients.

Factors Associated With Recurrence of Underlying Diseases Among Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVES: The recurrence of underlying diseases remains a major cause of graft failure after liver transplant. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the recurrence of underlying diseases and investigate the incidence of these factors and recurrence at the main liver transplant center in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included adult liver transplant recipients followed at Shiraz Transplant Center between 2011 and 2018 with a confirmed diagnosis of recurrence of underlying disease in our study. We reviewed medical records and extracted data on demographic characteristics, clinical and paraclinical features, medication use, and current status. We used a systematic random sampling method to select a control group of 95 transplant recipients who did not have recurrence. Of 3022 total transplant recipients, 76 recipients experienced a recurrence of their underlying disease. RESULTS: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, underlying disease, recipient blood group, donor sex, donor blood group, and rejection frequency were significantly different between study groups with and without recurrence of underlying diseases. Liver transplant recipients with recurrence had lower mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Recipients with recurrence also had higher rate of drug consumption (eg, prednisolone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus). Regression analysis showed that donor sex and rejection frequency had an effect on disease recurrence. Death occurred more frequently in liver transplant recipients with recurrence than in the control group (39.5% vs 26.3%), butthe difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Donor sex and acute rejection frequency are independent factors predictive of the recurrence of underlying disease. Modifying risk factors can help minimize the recurrence of underlying diseases after liver transplant.

Prognosis of Lung Transplantation in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Meta-Analysis Based on Cohort Studies.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) treated with lung transplantation compared to those with stable interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS), acute cellular rejection (ACR), primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 183 patients enrolled in the AE-ILD group and 337 patients in the stable-ILD group. The results showed that in regard to perioperative outcomes, the AE-ILD group did not differ from the stable-ILD group in the incidence of ACR (relative risks [RR] = 0.34, p = 0.44) and the incidence of PGD Ⅲ (RR = 0.53, p = 0.43), but had a longer LOS (mean difference = 9.15, p = 0.02). Regarding prognosis, the two also did not differ in 90-day OS (RR = 0.97, p = 0.59), 1-year OS (RR = 1.05, p = 0.66), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.91, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Our study concluded that the efficacy of lung transplantation in patients with AE-ILD is not inferior to that of patients with stable ILD. Lung transplantation is one of the potential treatments for patients with AE-ILD.

Ursodiol Prophylaxis in Recipients of Liver Transplant From Donors After Cardiac Death.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ursodiol in preventing biliary complications after transplant of livers from donors after cardiac death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective study that evaluated biliary complication rates in patients who received ursodiol (13-15 mg/kg/day) for 30 days (n = 32; post-ursodiol group) compared with patients who did not receive ursodiol after liver transplant from a cardiac death donor (n = 36; pre-ursodiol group [before introduction of ursodiol in the prophylaxis regimen]). Data were collected from September 2012 to September 2021. Patients were included if they were at least 19 years old and received a liver transplant from a donor after cardiac death. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine whether ursodiol decreased biliary complications within 30 days posttransplant. Secondary endpoints included change in biochemical serum liver tests (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine amino-transferase, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase) and time to identification of hepatobiliary complications at posttransplant days 7, 14, and 28, acute graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and patient survival at 1 and 6 months. RESULTS: Biliary complications were similar between groups. Four patients (12.5%) experienced biliary complications in the post-ursodiol group versus 1 patient (2.9%) in the pre-ursodiol group (not significant, P = .19). Biochemical liver enzymes at days 7, 14, and 28 were also not significant different between groups. Acute graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and patient survival at 1 and 6 months were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ursodiol prophylaxis did not show a diffrence in preventing biliary complications for recipients of liver transplant from donors after cardiac death.

The effect of remote ischemic conditioning on mortality after kidney transplantation: the systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic-reperfusion injury resulting from kidney transplantation declines the post-transplant graft function. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is known to be able to reduce the criticality of ischemic reperfusion injury. This study aimed to meta-analyze whether the application of remote ischemic conditioning to kidney transplantation patients improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: Researchers included randomized controlled studies of the application of RIC to either kidney donors or recipients. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2.0. The primary outcome was mortality after transplantation. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of delayed graft function, graft rejection, and post-transplant laboratory results. All outcomes were integrated by RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: Out of 90 papers, 10 articles (8 studies, 1977 patients) were suitable for inclusion criteria. Mortality collected at all time points did not show a significant difference between the groups. Three-month mortality (RR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.13-75.51, P = 0.49) tended to increase in the RIC group, but 12-month (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.14-3.45, P = 0.67) or final-reported mortality (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23-1.06, P = 0.07) was higher in the sham group than the RIC group. There was no significant difference between the RIC and sham group in delayed graft function (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.30-1.35, P = 0.24), graft rejection (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.73-1.73, P = 0.59), and the rate of time required for a 50% reduction in baseline serum creatinine concentration of less than 24 h (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.61-1.56, P = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: It could not be concluded that the application of RIC is beneficial to kidney transplantation patients. However, it is noteworthy that long-term mortality tended to decrease in the RIC group. Since there were many limitations due to the small number of included articles, researchers hope that large-scale randomized controlled trials will be included in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022336565.

Long-Term Graft and Patient Survival After Re-Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Kidney transplant recipients have higher life expectancy but may require subsequent transplantations, raising ethical concerns regarding organ allocation. We assessed the safety of multiple kidney transplants through long-term follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center, categorizing patients based on the number of kidney transplantations received. The primary outcome was the composite of death-censored graft failure and overall mortality. The secondary outcome was death-censored graft failure. RESULTS Between 2000 and 2019, our center performed 2152 kidney transplantations. Patients were divided into 3 groups: A (1 transplant; n=1850), B (2 transplants; n=285), and C (3 or more transplants; n=75). Group C patients were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and received more aggressive induction therapy. The primary outcomes, including death-censored graft loss and overall mortality, showed similar rates across groups (A: 21.3%, B: 25.2%, C: 21.7%, p=0.068). However, the secondary outcome of death-censored graft failure alone was significantly lower in group A compared to the other groups. No significant difference was observed between groups B and C (8% vs 16% and 13%, respectively, p=0.001, p=0.845). Multivariate analysis identified having a living donor as the strongest predictor of patient and graft survival in all study groups. CONCLUSIONS Graft and patient survival rates were similar between first and multiple transplant recipients. Multiple transplant recipients had lower death-censored graft failure risk compared to first transplant recipients. However, the risk did not differ among second and subsequent transplant recipients. Younger patients, especially those with a living donor, should be considered for repeat kidney transplantation.

Donor heart dysfunction and graft survival in liver and kidney transplants-A register-based study from Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stress cardiomyopathy in donors can potentially affect graft function and longevity. This study aims to investigate the association between echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and/or the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in organ donors, and short- and long-term liver and kidney graft survival. Our secondary aim was to link graft survival with donor and recipient characteristics. METHODS: All donors considered for liver and kidney donation with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2006 and 2016 were matched with their recipients through the Scandiatransplant register. The studied outcomes were graft survival, re-transplantation, and recipient death. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot time to event. Multivariate Cox-regression was used to test independence. RESULTS: There were 370 liver donors and 312 kidney donors (matched with 458 recipients) with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between June 2006 and November 2016. Of patients with LV dysfunction by echocardiography, there were 102 liver- and 72 kidney donors. Univariate survival analyses showed no statistical difference in the short- and long-term graft survival from donors with LV dysfunction compared to donors without. Donor age > 65 years, recipient re-transplantation and recipient liver tumor were predictors of worse outcome in liver transplants (p < .05). Donor age > 65, donor hypertension, recipient re-transplantation, and a recipient diagnosis of diabetes or nephritis/glomerulonephritis had a negative association with graft survival in kidney transplants (p < .05). CONCLUSION: We found no significant association between donor LV dysfunction and short- and long-term graft survival in liver and kidney transplants, suggesting that livers and kidneys from such donors can be safely transplanted.

Recipient donor sex combinations in solid organ transplantation and impact on clinical outcome: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a lifesaving treatment for end-stage organ failure. Although many factors affect the success of organ transplantation, recipient and donor sex are important biological factors influencing transplant outcome. However, the impact of the four possible recipient and donor sex combinations (RDSC) on transplant outcome remains largely unclear. METHODS: A scoping review was carried out focusing on studies examining the association between RDSC and outcomes (mortality, graft rejection, and infection) after heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. All studies up to February 2023 were included. RESULTS: Multiple studies published between 1998 and 2022 show that RDSC is an important factor affecting the outcome after organ transplantation. Male recipients of SOT have a higher risk of mortality and graft failure than female recipients. Differences regarding the causes of death are observed. Female recipients on the other hand are more susceptible to infections after SOT. CONCLUSION: Differences in underlying illnesses as well as age, immunosuppressive therapy and underlying biological mechanisms among male and female SOT recipients affect the post-transplant outcome. However, the precise mechanisms influencing the interaction between RDSC and post-transplant outcome remain largely unclear. A better understanding of how to identify and modulate these factors may improve outcome, which is particularly important in light of the worldwide organ shortage. An analysis for differences of etiology and causes of graft loss or mortality, respectively, is warranted across the RDSC groups. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Recipient and donor sex combinations affect outcome after solid organ transplantation. While female recipients are more susceptible to infections after solid organ transplantation, they have higher overall survival following SOT, with causes of death differing from male recipients. Sex-differences should be taken into account in the post-transplant management.

Impact of delayed listing after initiating kidney transplant evaluation on transplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Longer end-stage renal disease time has been associated with inferior kidney transplant outcomes. However, the contribution of transplant evaluation is uncertain. We explored the relationship between time from evaluation to listing (ELT) and transplant outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included 2535 adult kidney transplants from 2000 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used to compare transplant outcomes. RESULTS: Patient survival for both deceased donor (DD) recipients (p < .001) and living donor (LD) recipients (p < .0001) was significantly higher when ELT was less than 3 months. The risks of ELT appeared to be mediated by other risks in DD recipients, as adjusted models showed no associated risk of graft loss or death in DD recipients. For LD recipients, ELT remained a risk factor for patient death after covariate adjustment. Each month of ELT was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.021, p = .04) but not graft loss in LD recipients in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients with longer ELT times had higher rates of death after transplant, and ELT was independently associated with an increased risk of death for LD recipients. Investigations on the impact of pretransplant evaluation on post-transplant outcomes can inform transplant policy and practice.

Avascular Necrosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients is Associated With an Increased Risk of Patient Death.

Introduction: Avascular necrosis is a debilitating osseous complication in transplant recipients. Project Aim: This program evaluation sought to describe risk factors and adverse outcomes of avascular necrosis in kidney transplant recipients. Design: This was a retrospective evaluation of all recipients of kidneys and simultaneous pancreas and kidneys between 2001 and 2018 from a single center. Controls were selected based on the incidence density, sampling at a 1:3 ratio based on the post-transplant interval. Outcomes of interest were acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality. Results: A total of 88 kidney recipients had avascular necrosis and were compared with 257 controls. Most of the recipient's and donors' baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression was more prevalent, and non-white donors were less prevalent in the control group. Looking for risk factors for avascular necrosis, calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression was associated with a lower risk for avascular necrosis in the univariate analysis, but this was not found after adjustment of multiple variables. In multivariate analysis, avascular necrosis was associated with an increased risk for patient death (hazard ratio: 1.68; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.44; P = .008) but not for acute rejection or death censored graft failure. Conclusion: Although limited by small sample size, this evaluation found avascular necrosis to be associated with an increased risk of patient death. This finding may be useful for the provider taking care of the patients and discussing the various outcomes after the transplant.

The impact of time to death in donors after circulatory death on recipient outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

The time to arrest donors after circulatory death is unpredictable and can vary. This leads to variable periods of warm ischemic damage prior to pancreas transplantation. There is little evidence supporting procurement team stand-down times based on donor time to death (TTD). We examined what impact TTD had on pancreas graft outcomes following donors after circulatory death (DCD) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Data were extracted from the UK transplant registry from 2014 to 2022. Predictors of graft loss were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. Three-hundred-and-seventy-five DCD simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included. Increasing TTD was not associated with graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.41, P = .901). Increasing asystolic time worsened graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.43, P = .020). Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a nonlinear relationship between asystolic time and graft survival and no relationship between TTD and graft survival. We found no evidence that TTD impacts pancreas graft survival after DCD simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; however, increasing asystolic time was a significant predictor of graft loss. Procurement teams should attempt to minimize asystolic time to optimize pancreas graft survival rather than focus on the duration of TTD.

Impacto de la modalidad de diálisis sobre la morbimortalidad tras el fracaso del injerto renal: análisis con eventos competitivos / Impact of dialysis modality on morbimortality of kidney transplant recipients after allograft failure. Analysis in the presence of competing events

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: El número de personas que inician diálisis por el fracaso del injerto aumenta cada día. La modalidad de diálisis mejor para este tipo de pacientes no está bien definida y la mayoría de ellos son derivados a hemodiálisis (HD). El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar el impacto de la modalidad de diálisis sobre la morbilidad y la mortalidad en individuos trasplantados que inician este procedimiento tras el fracaso del injerto. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo observacional y de cohortes que compara la evolución de los pacientes que inician diálisis tras el fracaso del injerto, desde enero del año 2000 a diciembre del 2013. Un grupo lo hace en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y otro en HD. Se realizó un seguimiento a los pacientes hasta el cambio de técnica de diálisis, retrasplante o fallecimiento. Se analizaron datos antropométicos, comorbilidad, el filtrado glomerular (FG) con el que iniciaban la diálisis, la presencia de un acceso óptimo para esta, la presencia de intolerancia al injerto y el retrasplante. Estudiamos el motivo de los 10 primeros ingresos hospitalarios tras el inicio de la diálisis. Para el análisis estadístico, se tuvo en cuenta la presencia de eventos competitivos que dificultaran la aparición del evento de interés, muerte o ingreso hospitalario. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 175 pacientes. En DP 86 y 89 en HD. Los individuos que iniciaron DP eran más jóvenes, tenían menor comorbilidad y lo hacían con FG más bajos que los de HD. El seguimiento medio fue de 34 ± 33 meses, con una mediana de 24 (IQR siete a 50 meses), siendo mayor en los pacientes en HD que en los de DP (35 vs. 18 meses, p = < 0,001). Los factores de riesgo que influyeron en la mortalidad fueron la edad (coeficiente del sub Hazard Ratio [sHR] 1,06 (IC 95%: 1,033 a 1,106, p = 0,000), el uso no óptimo del acceso (sHR 3,00 (IC 95%: 1,507 a 5,982, p = 0,028) y el tipo de diálisis, la DP sHR[DP/HD] 0,36 (IC 95%: 0,148 a 0,890, p = 0,028). Los pacientes en DP tenían menos riesgo de un ingreso hospitalario sHR[DP/HD] 0,52 (IC 95%: 0,369 a 0,743, p = < 0,001) y menos probabilidad de desarrollar una intolerancia al injerto HR 0,307 (IC 95% 0,142 a 0,758, p = 0,009). CONCLUSIONES: Con las limitaciones de un estudio retrospectivo y no randomizado, es la primera vez a nivel nacional que se demuestra que la DP en términos de supervivencia es mejor que la HD cuando fracasa el injerto durante el primer año y medio en diálisis. La presencia de un acceso no óptimo para este procedimiento es un factor de riesgo de mortalidad independiente y modificable. La remisión precoz de los pacientes a las unidades de enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (ERCA) es fundamental para que estos elijan la técnica que más se adapte a sus circunstancias y preparar un acceso óptimo para el inicio de diálisis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The number of patients who start dialysis due to graft failure increases every day. The best dialysis modality for this type of patient is not well defined and most patients are referred to HD. The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of the dialysis modality on morbidity and mortality in transplant patients who start dialysis after graft failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observation and cohort study was performed to compare the evolution of patients who started dialysis after graft failure from January 2000 to December 2013. One group started on PD and the other on HD. The patients were followed until the change of dialysis technique, retransplantation or death. Anthropometric data, comorbidity, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at start of dialysis, the presence of an optimal access for dialysis, the appearance of graft intolerance and retransplantation were analysed. We studied the causes for the first 10 hospital admissions after starting dialysis. For the statistical analysis, the presence of competitive events that hindered the observation of the event of interest, death or hospital admission was analysed. RESULTS: 175 patients were included, 86 in DP and 89 in HD. The patients who started PD were younger, had less comorbidity and started dialysis with lower eGFR than those on HD. The mean follow-up was 34 ± 33 months, with a median of 24 months (IQR 7 - 50 months), Patients on HD had longer follow-up than patients on PD (35 vs. 18 months, p = < 0.001). The mortality risk factors were age sHR 1.06 (95% CI: 1.033 - 1.106, p = 0.000), non-optimal use of access for dialysis sHR 3.00 (95% CI: 1.507 - 5.982, p = 0.028) and the dialysis modality sHR (PD / HD) 0.36 (95% CI: 0.148 - 0.890, p = 0.028). Patients on PD had a lower risk of hospital admission sHR [DP / HD] 0.52 (95% CI: 0.369-0.743, p = < 0.001) and less probability of developing graft intolerance HR 0.307 (95% CI 0.142-0.758, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of a retrospective and non-randomized study, it is the first time nationwide that PD shows in terms of survival to be better than HD during the first year and a half after the kidney graft failure. The presence of a non-optimal access for dialysis was an independent and modifiable risk factor for mortality. Early referral of patients to advanced chronic kidney disease units is essential for the patient to choose the technique that best suits their circumstances and to prepare an optimal access for the start of dialysis

Desarrollo y resultados de un nuevo programa de trasplante de páncreas en España: la visión del cirujano / Development and results of a novel pancreas transplant program in Spain: the surgeon's point of view

INTRODUCCIÓN: El trasplante simultáneo de páncreas-riñón se encuentra indicado para pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y enfermedad renal terminal. Los resultados son excelentes aunque el número de procedimientos parece ser un factor que afecta a la supervivencia de paciente e injerto estando en relación con la morbilidad quirúrgica, derivada de complicaciones pancreáticas. el objetivo del estudio es describir el desarrollo de un nuevo programa y exponer los resultados en un centro con un volumen bajo de trasplantes. MÉTODOS: Analizamos 53 trasplantes simultáneos de páncreas-riñón, en un período de 7 años (2009-2016), con una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses. RESULTADOS: Dos pacientes han fallecido, uno tras parada cardíaca en postoperatorio y otro tras accidente de tráfico complicado con una neumonía. Entre los 51 pacientes vivos se han perdido 2 injertos, uno por un rechazo crónico tras cuatro años del trasplante y otro por trombosis arterial a los 20 días del mismo, motivo, este último, de la única trasplantectomía realizada. En diez pacientes se han realizado una o más reintervenciones: pancreatitis (n=3), oclusión intestinal (n=4), trombosis arterial (n=1), fístula con peritonitis (n=1) y hemoperitoneo (n=1). La supervivencia del paciente y del injerto a 1, 3, y 5 años fue del 98, 95 y 95% y del 96, 93 y 89%, respectivamente. Conclusiones Los resultados muestran que un nuevo programa de trasplante pancreático puede conseguir resultados similares a los de grupos con mayor volumen y experiencia. Una adecuada selección de donantes y receptores, una técnica homogénea y el aprendizaje con grupos expertos garantizan estos resultados

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic renal disease is widely performed. However, the rate of surgical morbidity from pancreatic complications remains high. The aim of this study was to describe the development and results of a new program, from the point of view of the pancreatic surgeon. METHODS: We analyzed 53 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed over a period of seven years (2009-2016), with a median follow up of 39 months (range: 1-86 months). RESULTS: Out of the total of this series, two patients died: one patient because of cardiac arrest immediately after surgery; and another patient due to traffic accident, complicated by pneumonia. Among the 51 living patients, two grafts were lost: one due to chronic rejection four years after transplantation; and the other due to arterial thrombosis 20 days after transplantation (the only case requiring transplantectomy). In ten patients, one or more re-operations were necessary due to the following: graft pancreatitis (n=4), small intestinal obstruction (n=4), arterial thrombosis (n=1), fistula (n=1) and hemoperitoneum (n=1). Overall patient and graft survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 95 and 95% and 96, 93 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the results of a new pancreas transplant program, which relies on the previous experience of other groups, do not demonstrate a learning curve. Adequate surgeon education and training, as well as the proper use of standardized techniques, should ensure optimal results

Critical analysis of graft loss and death in kidney transplant recipients treated with mTOR inhibitors / Análise crítica da perda do enxerto e óbito em receptores de transplante renal tratados com inibidores da mTOR

Abstract Registry studies and systematic reviews have shown higher risk for mortality and graft loss in patients in use of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) compared to calcineurin-based (CNI) immunosuppressive regimens. The majority of these studies pooled data from early trials using different strategies such as "de novo" combination of the high dose mTOR inhibitors with standard dose of CNI or high dose mTORi combined with mycophenolate. The large heterogeneity of these initial exploratory studies, many of them no longer in use, turns difficult any comparison with a well-defined standard of care regimen. The new strategies using concentration controlled reduced exposure of mTORi and CNI or early conversion from CNI to mTORi use have shown comparable patient and graft survival. Nevertheless, considering the central role of mTOR in health and disease states, more research is necessary to mitigate the adverse events and to explore further the potential beneficial effects of mTOR inhibitors.

Resumo Estudos de registro e revisões sistemáticas mostraram um aumento de mortalidade e perda do enxerto nos pacientes em uso dos inibidores da mTOR (imTOR) em comparação a regimes baseados nos inibidores de calcineurina (iCN). A maioria destes estudos reuniu dados de ensaios clínicos iniciais utilizando diferentes estratégias, tais como a combinação "de novo" de altas doses de imTOR com doses padrão de iCN ou altas doses de imTOR combinado com micofenolato. A grande heterogeneidade destes estudos exploratórios iniciais, muitos deles não mais em uso, tornam difícil qualquer comparação. As novas estratégias que utilizam a concentração controlada e reduziram a exposição tanto de imTOR quando de iCN mostraram sobrevida do paciente e enxerto comparáveis. No entanto, considerando o papel central dos imTOR nos estados de saúde e doença, é necessária mais investigação para mitigar os eventos adversos e explorar melhor seus potenciais efeitos benéficos.

Immunosuppression status of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C affects biopsy-proven acute rejection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relationship between patient survival and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of patients with and without BPAR and to identify risk factors for BPAR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 169 HCV-RNA-positive patients who underwent LT at three centers. RESULTS: BPAR occurred in 39 (23.1%) of the HCV-RNA-positive recipients after LT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 92.1%, 90.3%, and 88.5%, respectively, in patients without BPAR, and 75.7%, 63.4%, and 58.9% in patients with BPAR (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that BPAR was associated with the non-use of basiliximab and tacrolimus and the use of cyclosporin in LT recipients with HCV RNA-positive. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that the immunosuppression status of HCV-RNA-positive LT recipients should be carefully determined in order to prevent BPAR and to improve patient survival.

Meaning of leprosy for people who have experienced treatment during the sulfonic and multidrug therapy periods / Significado da hanseníase para pessoas que viveram o tratamento no período sulfônico e da poliquimioterapia / Significado de la lepra para personas que experimentaron el tratamiento en el período sulfónico y de poliquimioterapia

AbstractObjective: to analyze the meanings of leprosy for people treated during the sulfonic and multidrug therapy periods.Method: qualitative nature study based on the Vigotski's historical-cultural approach, which guided the production and analysis of data. It included eight respondents who have had leprosy and were submitted to sulfonic and multidrug therapy treatments. The participants are also members of the Movement for Reintegration of People Affected by Leprosy.Results: the meanings were organized into three meaning cores: spots on the body: something is out of order; leprosy or hanseniasis? and leprosy from the inclusion in the Movement for Reintegration of People Affected by Leprosy.Conclusion: the meanings of leprosy for people submitted to both regimens point to a complex construction thereof, indicating differences and similarities in both treatments. Health professionals may contribute to the change of the meanings, since these are socially constructed and the changes are continuous.

ResumoObjetivo:analisar significados da hanseníase para as pessoas que foram tratadas no período sulfônico e no período da poliquimioterapia.Método:estudo de natureza qualitativa fundamentado na abordagem histórico-cultural de Vigotski, a qual orientou a construção e análise dos dados. Foram incluídos oito entrevistados que já tiveram hanseníase e que realizaram tratamento no período sulfônico e da poliquimioterapia, sendo participantes do Movimento de Reintegração das Pessoas Atingidas pela Hanseníase.Resultados:os significados foram organizados em três núcleos de significação: manchas no corpo: alguma coisa está fora de ordem; lepra ou hanseníase? e hanseníase a partir da inserção no Movimento de Reintegração das Pessoas Atingidas pela Hanseníase.Conclusão:os significados de hanseníase para pessoas tratadas nos dois períodos apontam para a construção complexa dos mesmos, indicando diferenças e semelhanças nos dois períodos. Os profissionais de saúde podem contribuir para a mudança de significados, pois esses são socialmente construídos e as transformações são contínuas.

ResumenObjetivo:analizar los significados de la lepra para las personas que fueron tratadas en el período sulfónico y en el período de poliquimioterapia.Método:estudio de naturaleza cualitativa fundamentado en el abordaje histórico cultural de Vygotsky, el cual orientó la construcción y análisis de los datos. Fueron incluidos ocho entrevistados que ya tuvieron lepra y que realizaron tratamiento en el período sulfónico y de poliquimioterapia, siendo participantes del Movimiento de Reintegración de Personas Afectadas por la Lepra.Resultados:los significados fueron organizados en tres núcleos de significación: manchas en el cuerpo: alguna cosa está fuera de orden; ¿Lepra o enfermedad de Hansen?; y lepra a partir de la inserción en el Movimiento de Reintegración de Personas Afectadas por la Lepra. Conclusión: los significados de la lepra para las personas tratadas en los dos períodos apuntan para la construcción compleja de los mismos, indicando diferencias y semejanzas en los dos períodos. Los profesionales de la salud pueden contribuir para el cambio de significados, ya que estos son socialmente construidos y las transformaciones son continuas.