A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the survival and complication rates of inlay-retainer fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs). DATA/SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases in English and time filters (articles published from 1960) were used. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trails (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and prospective cohort studies on IRFDPs with a mean follow-up period of at least 2 years were included. Among 501 screened articles, one RCT and ten prospective cohort studies were included in this study. Of the included studies, information on failure and complications was independently extracted by two reviewers in duplicate. The failure and complication rates of IRFDPs were pooled with a random effect model and Poisson regression was applied to further investigate the influence of framework materials. The estimated 3- and 5-year survival rates of IRFDPs were 92.6% (95% CI: 85.8-97.6%) and 87.9% (95% CI: 77.4-96.1%), respectively. Debonding, fracture, dentine hypersensitivity and secondary caries were primary complications. The estimated 5-year rates of debonding, veneer fracture and secondary caries were 5.3%, 15.2% and 2.7%, respectively. Additionally, fiber-reinforced composite IRFDPs exhibited a lower incidence of debonding and caries with a higher rate of veneer fracture compared with metal-based and all-ceramic IRFDPs (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs), IRFDPs exhibited an acceptable 3-year survival rate but higher complication rates of debonding and veneer fracture. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: IRFDPs can be recommended as viable short- or middle-term minimally invasive alternatives to short-span conventional FDPs and ISCs, while the clinical outcome of IRFDPs as long-term definitive restorations still calls for further research. The indications of IRFDPs should be strictly controlled and monitored.

Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Dental Implants in Relation to Insertion Torque-A Comparative Ex Vivo Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this ex vivo study was to investigate the influence of different insertion torques on primary stability of a conical and a cylindrical implant system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two dental implants (Astra Tech OsseoSpeed 5.0 S × 11 mm cylindrical [n = 16] and 5.0 × 11 mm conical [n = 16]) were inserted with 20, 30, 40, and 45 N·cm into fresh porcine bone of mixed trabecular-cortical quality. Before insertion, bone quality was assessed via cone beam tomography. After insertion, resonance frequency analysis was reported using the implant stability quotient (ISQ). Implant insertion depths were evaluated, and the implants were pushed out of the bone by force (measured in N). All experiments were done with n = 4 per group. RESULTS: The highest ISQ (mean 78.25 ± 2.9) and pushout values (mean 675 N ± 5.8) were measured for the cylindrical implant after insertion using 30 N·cm. The conical implant showed the highest primary stability by means of ISQ (mean 76.25 ± 2.2) and pushout force (mean 502.5 N ± 9.6) after an insertion torque of 40 N·cm. If more insertion force was used, primary stability was reduced in all cases. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that different forms of an implant system need different insertion torques to obtain an optimal primary stability. These results have to be verified clinically.

Peri-Implantitis Associated with Type of Cement: A Retrospective Analysis of Different Types of Cement and Their Clinical Correlation to the Peri-Implant Tissue.

BACKGROUND: The cementation of fixed implant-supported dental restorations involves the risk of leaving excess cement in the mouth which can promote biofilm formation in the peri-implant sulcus. As a result, an inflammation may develop. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical effect of two different luting cements on the peri-implant tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within the scope of a retrospective clinical follow-up study, the prosthetic structures of 22 patients with 45 implants were revised. In all cases, a methacrylate cement (Premier Implant Cement [PIC], Premier® Dental Products Company, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA) had been used for cementation. In 16 additional patients with 28 implants, the suprastructures were retained with a zinc oxide-eugenol cement (Temp Bond [TB], Kerr Sybron Dental Specialities, Glendora, CA, USA). These patients were evaluated in the course of routine treatment. RESULTS: In both populations, the retention time of the suprastructures was similar (TB 3.77 years, PIC 4.07 years). In the PIC cases, 62% of all implants had excess cement. In the TB cases, excess cement was not detectable on any of the implants. Bleeding on probing was significantly more frequent on implants cemented with PIC (100% with and 94% without excess cement) than on implants cemented with TB (46%). Pocket suppuration was observed on 89% of the PIC-cemented implants with excess cement (PIC without excess cement 24%), whereas implants with TB were not affected by it at all. The peri-implant bone loss was significantly greater in the PIC patients (with excess cement 1.37 mm, without excess cement 0.41 mm) than it was in the TB patients (0.07 mm). CONCLUSION: The frequency of undetected excess cement depends essentially on the type of cement used. Cements that tend to leave more undetected excess have a higher prevalence for peri-implant inflammation and cause a more severe peri-implant bone loss.

[Orthodontic fixed retainer: fix or not fix? that is the question].

Orthodontic fixed retainer is widely used, as an orthodontic retention appliance, for nearly four decades. It answers the need for prolonged retention with minimum patient compliance. The effectiveness of fixed retainers was compared to other retention devices in several studies, and was found as effective as removable appliances. But, further high quality research is still needed. A bonded fixed retainer was suspected as an obstacle that impedes the patient's ability to keep satisfactory oral hygiene. But research failed to prove the influence of fixed retainers on periodontal health or white spot lesion occurrence as clinically significant. The definite downsides of fixed retainer are the risk of retainer breakage, and unwanted tooth movements. A typical tooth movement can appear even without a retainer breakage, including a change of torque of a mandibular incisor or skewing of the anterior mandibular arch segment. Both the dentist and the orthodontist are encouraged to be familiarized with these possible side effects, recognized them as soon as possible, and consider changing the retention protocol, when appropriate.

Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants.

AIM: To systematically review the literature to compare implant survival (IS) and marginal bone loss (MBL) around platform-switched (PS) versus conventionally restored platform-matching dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized, controlled human clinical trials (RCTs) comparing IS and MBL in PS and conventionally restored implants, with 12 months of follow-up and at least 10 implants were identified through electronic and manual search. Review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA statement. Risk ratio (RR) for implant failure and mean difference (MD) for MBL, with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Sources of heterogeneity among studies were also investigated by subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 435 subjects and 993 implants contributed to this review. The cumulative estimated implant success rate revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. At a patient level, a smaller amount of MBL [MD -0.55 mm, 95%CI (-0.86; -0.24), p = 0.0006] was noted around PS implants. Subgroup analyses performed at implant level suggested less MBL when platform switching showed a larger mismatching. CONCLUSION: PS technique appeared to be useful in limiting bone resorption. Nevertheless, these data should be interpreted cautiously as significant heterogeneity and possible publication bias were noted. Further research is needed to identify the factors most associated with successful outcomes.

Presença de linhas hipodensas em dentes após tratamento endodôntico e protético: avaliação por tomografia cone beam / Presence of lines radiofucency in teeth after prosthetic and endodontic treatments using cone beam tomography

Objetivo: O propósito deste trabalho foi avaliar quantitativamente, através da tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico, a presença de linhas hipodensas em diferentes situações de procedimentos operatórios endodôntico e protético. Material e Métodos: Para a pesquisa foram utilizados 32 dentes incisivos centrais superiores, submetidos a exames com o aparelho Newtom 3G, em quatro momentos distintos: dentes não manipulados; após a realização de tratamento endodôntico; após a cimentação do núcleo metálico intrarradicular e após a remoção deste núcleo com aparelho de ultrassom. Resultados: Verificou-se que a maior quantidade de linhas hipodensas ocorreu nos dentes após remoção do núcleo intrarradicular com ultrassom, decrescendo para os dentes somente com tratamento endo- dôntico, diminuindo nos dentes com núcleos cimentados, e em menor número nos dentes não manipulados.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the presence of lines radiolucency in different situations of procedures endodontics and prosthetic using cone beam computed tomography. Matherial and methods: For the research 32 incisive superior central teeth were selected and submitted the cone beam computed tomography - Newtom 3G, according the following moments: teeth not manipulated; after endodontic treatment; after placement of the endodontic post and after the endodontic post removal using ultrasonic instrumentation.

Changes in stability after healing of immediately loaded dental implants.

PURPOSE: To investigate the parameters that affect primary stability of dental implants, to determine how primary stability influences posthealing stability, and to ascertain the effect of primary stability and insertion parameters on marginal bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 940 immediately loaded implants were considered. Using resonance frequency analysis, primary stability (primary implant stability quotient [pISQ]) and stability after 4 months (tISQ) were recorded. When the differences between pISQ and tISQ exceeded 5 units, marginal bone loss was measured. The implants were placed into three groups based on their primary stability: high (pISQ > 72), moderate, and low (pISQ < 68). Changes in stability after 4 months of loading were evaluated. The relationships between pISQ, insertion parameters, DISQ (ie, tISQ - pISQ), and marginal bone loss were analyzed. The Student t test, one-way analysis of variance, and Spearman nonparametric correlation coefficient were employed for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 940 implants, tISQ was recorded in 526 implants and marginal bone loss was measured in 76 implants. There was no statistical relationship between pISQ and insertion torque. Primary stability was influenced by implant diameter but not by implant length. There was a significant relationship between implant insertion torque and bone type. The low primary stability group showed a significant increase in stability during healing. However, high primary stability implants demonstrated a significant reduction in their stability. The linear regression analysis demonstrated that at a pISQ of 69.2, tISQ value would equal pISQ value. Correlations between marginal bone loss and final insertion torque and between marginal bone loss and DISQ values were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Stability of immediately loaded implants with high pISQ decreased significantly during the initial 4 months of healing. However, stability of implants with low primary stability increased significantly. DISQ and insertion torque showed correlation with marginal bone loss.

In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems.

This study sought to evaluate the sealing capability of the implant abutment connection of different dental implant systems. Five Nobel Replace select, Straumann and Intra-lock implants of approximately 4.5 mm diameter with their respective abutments were provided by the manufacturers. A calibration curve was determined by placing toluidine blue (TB) increments of 0.1 microL into 1.5 mL of distilled water and recording its absorbance in a spectrophotometer until reaching 0.7 microL. Then, 0.7 microL of TB was placed in the deepest portion of each implant's internal screw, the abutments were adapted to the implant according to the manufacturer's instructions and the specimens were placed in vials with 1.5 mL of distilled water. Spectrophotometric analysis was performed at 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 h. Statistical analysis was performed by One-way anova at 95% level of significance. The calibration curve was linear with respect to the TB amount in 1.5 microL distilled water (R(2) = 0.9961). All implant abutment systems presented an increase in absorbance as a function of time. As time elapsed in vitro, significantly higher amounts of TB was released from the Straumann and Nobel Replace Select connection systems (P < 0.0001). Leakage was significant between the groups. Despite controlled torquing, the seal between the implant body and the abutment could not be maintained in all three of the systems tested.

[Fracture of implant abutment screws and removal of a remaining screw piece]. / Gefractureerde implantaatopbouwschroeven. Methoden van verwijdering.

Fracture of the implant abutment screws is a complication which can render an implant useless. The prevalence of abutment screw fracture does not exceed 2.5% after 10 years. Causes are loosening of implant abutment screw, too few, too short or too narrow implants, implants not inserted perpendicular to the occlusal plane, improper suprastructure, too long free-ending parts of the suprastructure, improper occlusion concept, premature occlusal contacts, parafunctions, inadequate skills of the dentist, and fabrication failures. Methods of removing a fractured implant abutment screw piece are, among others, the use of a self-made screwdriver and the use of a service set available for the specific implant system.

Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth.

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical trial examined the effect on teeth and implants when rigidly or non-rigidly connected in a cross-arch model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients received 2 implants, 1 on each side of the mandible, and were restored with 3-unit fixed partial dentures connected either rigidly or non-rigidly to an abutment tooth. Patients were followed for at least 5 years post-restoration. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis revealed no significant difference in crestal bone loss at implants (rigid versus non-rigid methods). An overall significant difference (P < .001) was found comparing methods for teeth. Paired t tests revealed no significant differences in crestal bone levels for implants or teeth at the 5-year recall. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox proportional hazards model showed no differences between attachment methods with regard to success based on survival and bone loss criteria. During the 5-year recall period, 1 implant (rigid side) was removed. Four implants developed bone loss greater than 2 mm during the course of this trial. One tooth on the rigid side and 2 teeth on the non-rigid side had greater than 2 mm of crestal bone loss and were removed secondary to fractures. In all, 5 abutment teeth were removed, all of which had been treated with root canal therapy and fractured at the interface of the post within the tooth. There was no clear relationship of tooth fracture to attachment. Repeated-measures analysis of mobility values revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study, and paired t tests revealed no statistically significant differences between implants for mobility. Repeated-measures analysis and paired t tests for probing depth revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study. There were no significant differences in soft tissue indices for either attachment method. The percentage of patients who had measurable intrusion was 66% for the non-rigid group, and 44% for the rigid group; 25% of the non-rigid teeth had greater than 0.5 mm intrusion, compared with 12.5% for the rigid group. For the 2 time periods evaluated, there was no significant increase in intrusion over time. The non-rigid-side implant required more nonscheduled visits to treat problems than the rigid implant and the teeth. DISCUSSION: Most patients were treated successfully with rigid or non-rigid attachment of implants to teeth. CONCLUSION: The high incidence of intrusion and non-scheduled patient visits suggest that alternative treatments without connecting implants to teeth may be indicated.

Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies report high survival rates of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture, complications with prostheses and the need for prosthetic maintenance are not so well documented. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to analyze three categories of prosthetic complications in relation to the type of retention mechanism for overdenture connection to the implants (ie, rigid or resilient). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients with a total of 258 implants participated in the study. They had been monitored regularly during an observation period of 5 to 15 years (mean 9.3 yr). Seventy-five patients had a resilient retention device (ball anchors or a round clip bar); 44 patients had a rigid bar with or without distal extensions. The incidence and rate of complications were calculated for the overall- and for the 2- and 5-year observation periods. Comparisons were made between the three categories of maintenance and the two types of retention. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied for calculations of changes of the retention mechanism. RESULTS: The mean number of complications per overdenture during the entire observation period was 3.5; this did not differ statistically between the two retention groups. Some significant differences were found only for the 2- and 5- year period. Broken, loose, or lost female parts were more frequently observed with resilient devices, as were repairs and relining of the resin denture base, whereas tightening of bar retainers was more typical with rigid bars. A change from a resilient retention device to a rigid bar was performed more often than vice versa but not at a statistically significant level. CONCLUSION: Although these long-term results do not indicate a significant difference between the retention groups, a slight superiority of the rigid bar is suggested.

Internal contamination of a 2-component implant system after occlusal loading and provisionally luted reconstruction with or without a washer device.

BACKGROUND: Microbial internal contamination of oral implants has been suggested as being responsible for inflammatory infiltration of peri-implant tissues at the fixture-abutment interface of 2-stage and 2-component implant systems; it is also considered as a potential source of pathogens. The present in vivo study evaluated contamination of the inner abutment-implant retaining screw, after occlusal loading and provisionally-luted reconstruction with or without a washer device. METHODS: Eight 2-component oral implants sealed with an o-ring silicon washer device and 9 without a seal were placed in 7 patients with high oral hygiene standards. Two months after prosthetic reconstruction, crowns and internal screws were removed, and organic and inorganic screw contamination was examined by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. RESULTS: An amorphous and crystalline contamination, suggestive of calcium and phosphate compounds, was seen on all screw surfaces. Microbial contamination was more frequently observed in the unsealed group. No differences in bacterial morphotypes were observed between the sealed and unsealed implants. Cocci were the most representative morphotypes, while rods were seldom seen. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical situations, leakage occurs at the implant-abutment interface, although bacterial contamination is limited in patients with high oral hygiene standards. Contamination may be reduced by using a washer device.

Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability: a 15-year retrospective study of Brånemark System implants.

The present study evaluated implant survival and marginal bone loss in maxillae over a 15-year follow-up period as a function of either monocortical or bicortical implant anchorage. Of 207 standard Brånemark implants (10 mm in length) followed, 110 implants were judged to be monocortically anchored and 97 as bicortically anchored. The bicortically anchored implants failed nearly 4 times more often than the monocortical ones. Implant fractures accounted for over 80% of the observed failures and were found to affect the bicortical group almost 3 times more often. As tentative explanations, induction of increased stress and bending forces resulting from possible prosthetic misfit, presence of unfavorable arch relationships, or high occlusal tables in combination with bicortically anchored implants have been suggested, all indicating an overambitious fixation of the bicortical anchorage. Total marginal bone loss was low over the 15-year period and close to identical for the 2 groups, suggesting that the mode of cortical anchorage did not have any clinically significant influence on marginal bone remodeling.