A Novel Method for the Approximation of Humeral Head Retrotorsion Based on Three-Dimensional Registration of the Bicipital Groove.

BACKGROUND: The accurate restoration of premorbid anatomy is key for the success of reconstructive surgeries of the proximal part of the humerus. The bicipital groove has been proposed as a landmark for the prediction of humeral head retrotorsion. We hypothesized that a novel method based on bilateral registration of the bicipital groove yields an accurate approximation of the premorbid anatomy of the proximal part of the humerus. METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) triangular surface models were created from computed tomographic data of 100 paired humeri (50 cadavers). Segments of the distal part of the humerus and the humeral shaft of prespecified lengths were defined. A surface registration algorithm was applied to superimpose the models onto the mirrored contralateral humeral model based on the defined segments. We evaluated the 3D proximal humeral contralateral registration (p-HCR) errors, defined as the difference in 3D rotation of the humeral head between the models when superimposed. For comparison, we quantified the landmark-based retrotorsion (LBR) error, defined as the intra-individual difference in retrotorsion, measured with a landmark-based 3D method. RESULTS: The mean 3D p-HCR error using the most proximal humeral shaft (bicipital groove) segment for the registration was 2.8° (standard deviation [SD], 1.5°; range, 0.6° to 7.4°). The mean LBR error of the reference method was 6.4° (SD, 5.9°; range, 0.5° to 24.0°). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral 3D registration of the bicipital groove is a reliable method for approximating the premorbid anatomy of the proximal part of the humerus. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The accurate approximation of the premorbid anatomy is a key for the successful restoration of the premorbid anatomy of the proximal part of the humerus.

The importance of adequate stem anteversion for rotational stability in cemented total hip replacement: a radiostereometric study with ten-year follow-up.

Progressive retroversion of a cemented stem is predictive of early loosening and failure. We assessed the relationship between direct post-operative stem anteversion, measured with CT, and the resulting rotational stability, measured with repeated radiostereometric analysis over ten years. The study comprised 60 cemented total hip replacements using one of two types of matt collared stem with a rounded cross-section. The patients were divided into three groups depending on their measured post-operative anteversion (< 10°, 10° to 25°, > 25°). There was a strong correlation between direct post-operative anteversion and later posterior rotation. At one year the < 10° group showed significantly more progressive retroversion together with distal migration, and this persisted to the ten-year follow-up. In the < 10° group four of ten stems (40%) had been revised at ten years, and an additional two stems (20%) were radiologically loose. In the 'normal' (10° to 25°) anteversion group there was one revised (3%) and one loose stem (3%) of a total of 30 stems, and in the > 25° group one stem (5%) was revised and another loose (5%) out of 20 stems. This poor outcome is partly dependent on the design of this prosthesis, but the results strongly suggest that the initial rotational position of cemented stems during surgery affects the subsequent progressive retroversion, subsidence and eventual loosening. The degree of retroversion may be sensitive to prosthetic design and stem size, but < 10° of anteversion appears deleterious to the long-term outcome for cemented hip prosthetic stems.