Characterization of 14 raspberry cultivars by solid-phase microextraction and relationship with gray mold susceptibility.

Fourteen raspberry varieties were evaluated over two cropping seasons by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Thirty-six compounds were fully identified, and 10 more compounds were tentatively identified. Despite interannual variability, raspberry varieties can be divided in two main groups on the basis of terpenes and C-13 norisoprenoids. Susceptibility toward Botrytis cinerea , one of the most relevant pathogenic fungi for soft fruits during storage, was also evaluated. On the basis of volatile profiles, it was possible to highlight the relationship between different volatile compounds and resistance to B. cinerea. Volatile profiles and Botrytis susceptibility of the different raspberry varieties evaluated should assist future breeding programs.

14-3-3 gene family in hybrid poplar and its involvement in tree defence against pathogens.

In ongoing investigations of the role of the signal transduction pathway in tree-pathogen interactions, four complete and two partial 14-3-3 cDNAs have been isolated which are members of a gene family. Comparisons of DNA sequences reveal a high degree of identity among the cDNAs, and, in some cases, higher than 75% sequence similarity with previously published sequences. Sequence analysis at the amino acid level uncovered potential phosphorylation sites, some of which were identical among the proteins, and some of which varied. Treatment of trees with chitosan, jasmonates or by wounding of leaves, caused increases in the levels of 14-3-3 mRNA transcripts. Since jasmonates and chitosan are signal transducers of defence reactions in plants, these results suggest a possible role for 14-3-3 proteins in the pathogen defence response of deciduous trees. Effects of elicitors on transcription of the pal gene were also monitored. Pal is a well-characterized, pathogen response-related gene.

Determination of the primary structure of two lipid transfer proteins from apricot (Prunus armeniaca).

It has been recently demonstrated that the major allergen of apricot is a protein of molecular mass (Mr) 9000 belonging to the family of Lipid Transfer Protein. The aim of this study was the determination of the primary structure of apricot LTP by micro-sequencing and mass spectrometric analyses. Apricot LTP is a 91 amino acids protein like peach and almond LTPs with a sequence identity of 91% and 94%, respectively. Like for the peach LTP, out of the 25 amino acids forming the inner surface of the tunnel-like hydrophobic cavity in maize ns-LTP, 16 are identical and 7 similar in the apricot LTP, supporting the hypothesis of a similar function.

Pyr c 1, the major allergen from pear (Pyrus communis), is a new member of the Bet v 1 allergen family.

Pear is known as an allergenic food involved in the 'oral allergy syndrome' which affects a high percentage of patients allergic to birch pollen. The aim of this study was to clone the major allergen of this fruit, to express it as bacterial recombinant protein and to study its allergenic properties in relation to homologous proteins and natural allergen extracts. The coding region of the cDNA was obtained by a PCR strategy, cloned, and the allergen was expressed as His-Tag fusion protein. The fusion peptide was removed by treatment with cyanogen bromide. Purified non-fusion protein was subjected to allergenicity testing by the enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST), Western blotting, competitive inhibition assays, and basophil histamine release. The deduced protein sequence shared a high degree of identity with other major allergens from fruits, nuts, vegetables, and pollen, and with a family of PR-10 pathogenesis related proteins. The recombinant (r) protein was recognised by specific IgE from sera of all pear-allergic patients (n = 16) investigated in this study. Hence, the allergen was classified as a major allergen and named Pyr c 1. The IgE binding characteristics of rPyr c 1 appeared to be similar to the natural pear protein, as was demonstrated by EAST-inhibition and Western blot-inhibition experiments. Moreover, the biological activity of rPyr c 1 was equal to that of pear extract, as indicated by basophil histamine release in two patients allergic to pears. The related major allergens Bet v 1 from birch pollen and Mal d 1 from apple inhibited to a high degree the binding of IgE to Pyr c 1, whereas Api g 1 from celery, also belonging to this family, had little inhibitory effects, indicating epitope differences between Bet v 1-related food allergens. Unlimited amounts of pure rPyr c 1 are now available for studies on the structure and epitopes of pollen-related food allergens. Moreover, the allergen may serve as stable and standardised diagnostic material.

Molecular basis of allergic cross-reactivity between group 1 major allergens from birch and apple.

Patients allergic to birch pollen often also react with fruits and vegetables, such as apple. The major cause of cross-reactivity between birch and apple is biochemical and immunological similarity between the major allergens, Bet v 1 and Mal d 1, as demonstrated by serological and cellular immunoassays. In addition, birch pollen-specific therapeutic allergy vaccination has been shown to improve allergic symptoms caused by oral ingestion of apple. Detailed analysis of molecular surface areas based on the crystal structure of Bet v 1, and primary sequence alignment, identify potential epitopes for cross-reactive antibodies. Two or more conserved patches are identified when comparing Bet v 1 and Mal d 1, thus providing a molecular model for serological cross-reactivity involving more than one IgE-binding epitope. A minimum of two epitopes would be necessary for cross-linking of receptor bound IgE in functional histamine release assays and skin test. Individual amino acid substitutions, as occurring in isoallergenic variation, may, however, have a dramatic effect on epitope integrity if critical residues are affected. Thus, one area large enough to accommodate antibody-binding epitopes shared by all known Mal d 1 isoallergens and variants is identified, as well as areas shared by Bet v 1 and individual Mal d 1 isoallergens or variants. The occurrence of limited epitope coincidence between Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 is in agreement with the observation that some, but not all, birch pollen allergic patients react with apple, and that the epitope repertoire recognised by the IgE of the individual patients determines the degree of cross-reactivity.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with apple.

The aim of the study was to develop and evaluate different methods of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with apple. Three different DBPCFC models were evaluated: fresh apple juice, freshly grated apple, and freeze-dried apple powder. All challenges were performed outside the pollen season and took place from 1997 to 1999. The freeze-dried apple material was characterized by means of leukocyte histamine release (HR), skin prick test (SPT), and immunoblotting experiments. The study population consisted of birch pollen-allergic patients with a history of rhinitis in the birch-pollen season and positive specific IgE to birch. For comparison of the DBPCFC models, 65 patients with a positive open oral challenge with apple were selected. In the characterization of the freeze-dried apple material, 46 birch pollen-allergic patients were included. The IgE reactivity to apple was evaluated by measurement of specific IgE, HR, and SPT. Golden Delicious apples were used in all experiments. The results of this study showed that it was possible to perform DBPCFC with apple in birch pollen-allergic individuals. The model with freshly squeezed apple juice had a low sensitivity and displayed a high frequency of reactions to placebo, probably due to the ingredients used for blinding. The sensitivity of the models with freshly grated apple and freeze-dried apple powder was 0.74/0.60. An increase in sensitivity is desirable. The freeze-dried apple powder proved to be useful for SPT, HR, and oral challenges, but further investigation of the stability and the allergenic profile of the material is needed.

Clinical cross-reactivity among foods of the Rosaceae family.

BACKGROUND: Foods from the Rosaceae botanical family have been increasingly reported as causes of allergic reaction. Patients frequently have positive skin tests or radioallergosorbent test results for multiple members of this botanical family. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the clinical cross-reactivity assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) of Rosaceae foods (apricot, almond, plum, strawberry, apple, peach, and pear). METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to Rosaceae were included in the study. Skin prick tests and CAP System (FEIA) were performed with Rosaceae foods in all patients. Clinical reactivity to Rosaceae was systematically evaluated by open food challenges (OFCs), unless there was a convincing history of a recent severe anaphylaxis. Positive reactions on OFCs were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs. RESULTS: Twenty-six and 24 patients had positive skin prick tests and CAP FEIA with Rosaceae, respectively; from these 88% and 100% had positive tests with >/=2. No evidence of clinical reactivity was found in 66% percent of positive skin prick tests and 63% of positive specific IgE determinations to fruits. A total of 226 food challenges (including OFC and DBPCFC) were performed in the 28 patients with positive skin prick tests or CAP System FEIA. Of 182 initial OFCs carried out, 26 (14%) reactions were confirmed by DBPCFCs. Overall, 40 reactions were considered positive in 22 patients with positive skin tests or CAP FEIA. Thirty-eight reactions had been previously reported, the remaining two were detected by systematic challenges. Most reactions were caused by peach (22 patients), apple (6), and apricot (5). Ten patients (46%) were clinically allergic to peach and other Rosaceae. CONCLUSION: Positive skin test and CAP System FEIA should not be taken as the only guide for multi-species dietary restrictions. Nevertheless, the potential clinical allergy to other Rosaceae should not be neglected. If the reported reaction is confirmed, current tolerance to other Rosaceae should be precisely established unless there has been ingestion without symptoms after the reaction.

Lipid transfer protein: a pan-allergen in plant-derived foods that is highly resistant to pepsin digestion.

BACKGROUND: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are small molecules of approximately 10 kD that demonstrate high stability. They have recently been identified as allergens in the Rosaceae subfamilies of the Prunoideae (peach, apricot, plum) and of the Pomoideae (apple). They belong to a family of structurally highly conserved proteins that are also present in non-Rosaceae vegetable foods. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the cross-reactivity to non-Rosaceae LTPs, and to study the role of protein stability in allergenicity. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with a positive SPT to Rosaceae fruit extracts enriched for LTP were characterized by interview and SPT. To investigate IgE cross-reactivity between Rosaceae and non-Rosaceae LTPs, RAST and RAST inhibition as well as ELISA and ELISA inhibition were performed, using whole food extracts and purified LTPs. Both purified natural LTPs (peach, carrot and broccoli) and Pichia pastoris recombinant LTPs (carrot and wheat) were included. Pepsin digestion was used to address the role of stability in the allergenicity of LTPs. RESULTS: IgE antibodies to Rosaceae LTPs reacted to a broad range of vegetable foods, including Gramineae (cereals), Leguminosae (peanut), Juglandaceae (walnut), Anacardiaceae (pistachio), Brassicaceae (broccoli), Umbelliferae (carrot, celery), Solanaceae (tomato), Cucurbitaceae (melon), and Actinidiaceae (kiwi). Binding and inhibition studies with purified natural and recombinant LTPs confirmed their role in this cross-reactivity. Many of these cross-reactivities were accompanied by clinical food allergy, frequently including systemic reactions. Antibody binding to LTP was shown to be resistant to pepsin treatment of whole extract or purified LTP. CONCLUSION: LTP is a pan-allergen with a degree of cross-reactivity comparable to profilin. Due to its extreme resistance to pepsin digestion, LTP is a potentially severe food allergen.

A flavonoid sulfate antigen activates human alphabeta CD8+ Th2 lymphocytes in pollen allergy.

Cellular immune responses are initiated when T lymphocytes expressing alphabeta TCR recognize peptide antigens bound to MHC molecules or, less frequently, double-stranded glycolipid antigens bound to CD1 molecules. In the allergy to Parietaria judaica, human alphabeta CD8+ Th2 lymphocytes react to a non-peptide pollinic antigen presented by B cells. The environmental allergen was purified and identified as a new flavonoid pigment: 2'-O-sulfate, 6-O-betaD-glucuronopyranosyl, 2',5,6-trihydroxy-isoflavone. Its specific recognition by alphabeta CD8+ Th2 T cells (1) depends upon an MHC- and CD1-independent presentation mediated by B cells, (2) is determined by the flavonoid carbohydrate and sulfate groups and (3) leads to positive skin prick test in allergic patients. Hence, an unusual mode of aromatic sulfated antigen recognition by alphabeta CD8+ Th2 T lymphocytes might underlie the cellular mediation of human allergy to plant allergens.

Evidence for a lipid transfer protein as the major allergen of apricot.

BACKGROUND: Apricots are widely grown in Europe, and allergic reactions are becoming more common, especially oral allergy syndrome. Apricot belongs to the botanical subfamily of Prunoideae, which includes peach, the major allergen of which was identified as a 9-kd protein, a lipid transfer protein (LTP). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the IgE reactivity pattern to an apricot extract in subjects with allergic reactions to apricot, as demonstrated by a positive oral challenge response. METHODS: Thirty patients were investigated. All the patients displayed oral allergy syndrome (2 with systemic reactions) to apricot, with positive open food challenge responses, skin prick test responses, and serum-specific IgE antibodies to apricot. The IgE reactivity pattern to apricot extract was identified by using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The major allergen, a 9-kd protein, was then purified by HPLC and characterized by periodic acid-Schiff stain, isoelectric point determination, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing. RESULTS: The sera from all patients allergic to apricot recognized the 9-kd protein, whereas none of the other allergens, with molecular weights from 15 to 80 kd, acted as a major allergen. The 9-kd allergen has an isoelectric point of 8.7 and is not glycosylated. Determination of the N-terminal 34 amino acid sequence showed that it belongs to the LTP family, with a 94% homology with the LTP from peach. IgE blotting of the apricot extract was completely inhibited by the 9-kd purified LTP from peach. CONCLUSIONS: The major allergen of apricot is an LTP, which is highly cross-reactive with the LTP from peach.

Identification and characterization of cross-reactive natural rubber latex and Ficus benjamina allergens.

BACKGROUND: An association between allergy to Ficus benjamina and natural rubber latex (NRL) has been suspected based on clinical and immunological observations. The responsible cross-reactive allergens have not been identified yet. This study was undertaken to investigate the cross-reactivity between hevein (Hev b 6.02, 4.7 kD), a major allergen of NRL, and F. benjamina and identify its counterpart in F. benjamina. METHODS: 89 serum samples from subjects allergic to NRL were used in the study. Skin prick tests were performed with highly purified hevein and sap extract of F. benjamina. Specific IgE antibodies to NRL, F. benjamina and Hev b 6.02 were determined by the Pharmacia CAP method. Cross-reactivity among these allergens was investigated by means of CAP and immunoblot inhibition experiments. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis separation and protein microsequencing were performed to identify the cross-reactive allergens in F. benjamina. RESULTS: 67 out of 89 (75%) sera showed elevated IgE to hevein. Specific IgE to Ficus were found in 22 (24.7%) sera, and with 1 exception, all these sera also had IgE to Hev b 6.02. Results of CAP inhibition assays using 11 sera showing IgE to both Hev b 6.02 and Ficus demonstrated that the IgE to Ficus could be completely inhibited by Hev b 6.02 in 6 of 11 sera. Immunoblots and immunoblot inhibition assays revealed that a protein of about 45 kD in F. benjamina is strongly recognized by serum IgE. In addition, the IgE-binding reactivity to this 45-kD protein could be completely inhibited by preincubation of the sera with Hev b 6.02. N-terminal protein sequencing of 14 amino acids indicated that this 45-kD protein has a hevein-like domain at the N-terminal region and may belong to the endochitinase family. CONCLUSION: Latex-allergic patients are at higher risk of becoming sensitized to Ficus. Hev b 6.02 in latex is a major cross-reactive allergen and its counterpart in F. benjamina is an acidic protein with a molecular weight of about 45 kD and a hevein-like N-terminal domain.

Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts.

BACKGROUND: A minority of patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) induced by Rosaceae or nuts are positive on skin prick tests with commercial food extracts. This suggests reactivity against distinct stable allergens. OBJECTIVES: (1) To define the prevalence of subjects positive on skin prick tests with commercial extracts among patients with OAS caused by Rosaceae and/or nuts and (2) To investigate whether commercial extracts-positive subjects show some peculiar clinical feature and may represent a specific subset with food allergy. METHODS: Skin prick tests were carried out with a large panel of commercial extracts of airborne allergens (Allergopharma) and of vegetable foods (Dome/Hollister-Stier) in 298 adults with OAS caused by Rosaceae (n = 237) and or nuts (n = 161), positive on skin prick tests with fresh offending foods. RESULTS: 25/237 (11%) patients were positive on prick tests with commercial plum extract. This subgroup showed a higher incidence of systemic symptoms (64% versus 6%; P < .001) and a lower incidence of birch pollen allergy (12% versus 99%; P < .001) than commercial extract-negative patients; moreover, 36% versus 0%, respectively, did not have respiratory allergy (P < .001). Apple and peach were the main offending foods among commercial extract-negative and commercial extract-positive patients, respectively (87% versus 44% for apple, P < .001; and 52% versus 88% for peach, P < .005). Eight of one hundred sixty-one (5%) nuts-sensitive patients were positive on prick test with commercial walnut extract. This subgroup showed a higher proportion of patients who experienced systemic symptoms (63% versus 6%, P < .001), a lower prevalence of birch pollen allergy (13% versus 97%, P < .001), and a higher prevalence of grass pollen allergy (88% versus 41%, P < .05) than commercial extract-negative subjects. Further, reactivity against commercial walnut extract was associated with skin reactivity against commercial extracts of peanut (88% versus 37%, P < .005), tomato (75% versus 5%, P < .001), and plum (63% versus 8%, P < .001), and inversely related with skin reactivity against fresh apple (P < .001). In most cases, high levels of IgE specific for peach, apple, and hazelnut were associated with peanut reactivity rather than with clinical sensitivity to specific foods. In a preliminary investigation, most commercial extract-positive patients reacted against a 10-kDa protein characterized as a lipid transfer protein (LTP). CONCLUSIONS: Skin prick tests with commercial extracts of plum and walnut may be usefully employed to detect patients with OAS reacting against stable allergens. The high prevalence of systemic symptoms in these patients suggests that allergens' stability is associated with a higher resistance to the gastrointestinal environment and strongly influences the clinical expression of vegetable food allergy. At least some stable allergens, namely lipid transfer protein might be shared by botanically unrelated fruits such as nuts, peanuts, legumes, tomato, and Prunoideae.

Clinical role of a lipid transfer protein that acts as a new apple-specific allergen.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to apple is commonly associated with birch pollinosis because the two share homologous allergens. However, some patients have apple allergy but no birch pollinosis, suggesting that there are allergens that do not cross-react with birch. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the IgE reactivity pattern to an apple extract in subjects with allergic reactions to apple, with and without birch hay fever. METHODS: Forty-three patients with oral allergy syndrome for apple and positive open food challenge, skin prick test, and serum specific IgE antibodies to apple were admitted to the study. Thirty-two had birch pollinosis (documented by specific IgE for birch) and 11 were not allergic to birch. The IgE reactivity pattern to apple extract was identified by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The consistent allergen, a 9-kd protein, was then purified by HPLC and characterized by periodic acid-Schiff staining, isoelectric point, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing. RESULTS: The sera from 28% of patients allergic to apple with birch pollinosis, but from all patients allergic only to apple, recognized the 9-kd protein. This protein has an isoelectric point of 7.5 and is not glycosylated. Determination of its partial amino acid sequence showed that it belongs to the family of lipid transfer proteins, which act as major allergens in Prunoideae fruits. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a lipid transfer protein is an important allergen in patients allergic to apple but not to birch pollen. The prevalent IgE reactivity to this allergen in subjects with no birch pollinosis and the physicochemical characteristics of this protein suggest that sensitization may occur through the oral route.

Peels of Rosaceae fruits have a higher allergenicity than pulps.

BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon that patients allergic to fruits such as apple, pear, and peach, refer adverse reactions after the ingestion of the whole fruit, but subsequently tolerate the pulp. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the allergenicity of peels and pulps of apple, peach, and pear in 33 patients allergic to these fruits. METHODS: Clinical reactivity to the ingestion of whole fruit (peel + pulp) and pulp was established by medical history. Peels and pulps were tested separately in skin prick tests (SPTs), histamine release tests (HRTs) and RASTs. Cross-allergenicity between peel and pulp of apple and peach was studied by RAST inhibition. RESULTS: Adverse reactions appeared more frequently and were more severe when the whole fruit was eaten. More than 40% of patients allergic to apple and pear tolerated the ingestion of the pulp of these fruits, and reactions were only elicited by the intake of the whole fruit. Peels induced higher SPTs, HRTs and RASTs than pulps. An important cross-allergenicity was found between the peel and pulp of apple and peach, although the amount of the shared allergenic epitopes seemed to be higher in peels. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that peels of Rosaceae fruits such as apple, peach, and pear, have a higher allergenicity than pulps, which is clinically relevant. This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of patients allergic to Rosaceae fruits, and in the production of diagnostic materials.

Identification and characterization of the major allergen of the Humulus japonicus pollen.

BACKGROUND: Pollen of Humulus japonicus has been known as one of the important causes of pollinosis in Korea and China. To date, the major allergen of H. japonicus has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To identify the major allergen of H. japonicus pollen and characterize its biochemical properties. METHODS: With the sera of 29 patients reactive to H. japonicus, the major allergen of H. japonicus was determined from the results of IgE immunoblotting and ELISA inhibition. The biochemical properties of the major allergen of H. japonicus were evaluated by lectin blotting assay and 2-dimensional PAGE blot. N-terminal amino acid sequences were determined by the Edman degradation method. The suggested major allergen was purified by DEAE anion exchange and gel filtration chromatography. RESULTS: Twenty-nine sera contained IgE bound to the 10, 16, 20, 29 and 42 kDa proteins of H. japonicus in immunoblot analysis. A protein of 10 kDa was the most prevalent allergen in the sera of H. japonicus-reactive patients (72%). The ELISA optical density of H. japonicus-specific IgE was not inhibited by pollen extracts of birch, oak, rye grass and mugwort. The 10-kDa allergen was neither stained with PAS nor bound with ConA and five other lectins. The isoelectric point of the 10-kDa allergen was approximately pH 5.1. We sequenced the N-terminal amino acids of the 10-kDa allergen, which was not homologous with any previously characterized allergen. The 10-kDa allergen could be purified with DEAE anion exchange and gel filtration chromatography. Maximum inhibitions of H. japonicus-specific IgE ELISA by whole extract of H. japonicus and purified 10-kDa allergen were more than 97 and 88%, respectively, while the 50% inhibitory concentration of the whole extract of H. japonicus and purified 10 kDa were 38 and 20 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 10-kDa peptide could be a major allergen of H. japonicus. Its isoelectric point was 5.1 and it did not bind with lectins. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the 10-kDa major allergen was also determined.

Determination of the allergenic activity of birch pollen and apple prick test solutions by measurement of beta-hexosaminidase release from RBL-2H3 cells. Comparison with classical methods in allergen standardization.

BACKGROUND: A murine in vitro model of the allergic type I reaction was set up to determine the biologic activity of extracts without involvement of human beings. It is based on beta-hexosaminidase release from passively sensitized RBL cells after allergen challenge. The intended application of this RBL cell assay in the field of quality control of allergenic extracts requires its comparison with established methods. METHODS: The activity of five standardized birch-pollen prick test solutions was determined in parallel by RBL assay, direct IgE binding, IgE-binding inhibition, major allergen content, histamine-release assay, and skin testing. RESULTS: The RBL cell-release assay corresponded well to other methods if a reagin raised against natural birch-pollen extract was used for passive sensitization. However, in the case of a reagin against recombinant Bet v 1, only a decreased activity was observed, presumably because a reduced number of epitopes were recognized by the monospecific reagin. In contrast to standardized birch-pollen extracts, nonstandardized apple extracts showed poor activity in all assays. CONCLUSIONS: This murine model might be a useful tool in the quality control of allergenic extracts. It combines properties of assays based on standardized antisera and of assays that consider IgE cross-linking properties.