Methods of collection, extender type, and freezability of semen collected from creole bulls raised in the tropical highlands of Ecuador.

This study was conducted to determine the best combination between two collection method and two extenders in the cryopreservation of semen from creole bulls adapted to highlands of the Ecuadorian Andes. Sixty ejaculates from three adult Creole bulls were evaluated after collection by artificial vagina (AV) and electroejaculation (EE). Semen samples were split into two aliquots and diluted with a soy lecithin extender (Andromed®; A) or an egg yolk-containing extender (Triladyl®; T) and packed in straws of 0.25 ml with 20 × 106 sperms. Optical microscopy and computer-assisted semen analysis system (CASA) were used to evaluate semen quality characteristics. The effects of collection methods and extender type as well as its interaction were evaluated by a factorial ANOVA and Bonferroni's test. Semen samples collected with EE and frozen with T (EE-T) and A (EE-A) had greater proportion of spermatozoa with optical assessed individual progressive motility (IPM), plasmatic membrane intact (HosT), and lower tail abnormalities than those obtained with AV and frozen with the same extenders (AV-T and AV-A); however, differences were significant only between EE-A and AV-T. CASA assessment indicated that the total mobility (TM) was greater (P < 0.05) in semen samples diluted with T, although these samples had a greater proportion (P < 0.05) of sperms with local motility (LM) and fewer immobile sperms (IS), than those extended with A. Generally, semen samples obtained with EE or AV and diluted with T seems to be the best option to ciopreserve gametes of Creole bulls raised in highlands of Ecuadorian Andes.

LED-based red light photostimulation improves short-term response of cooled boar semen exposed to thermal stress at 37°C.

Pre-treatment of boar semen with a red light photostimulation procedure increases its "in vivo" fertilising ability. However, "in vitro" conducted studies shown contradictory results regarding the ability of photostimulated spermatozoa to react against strong stress and to achieve the capacitation status. The aim here was to determine the effect of photostimulation on the response to short-term moderate thermal stress of boar semen. Boar semen was exposed to red LED light regime emitting a 620-630 nm during 10 min of light, 10 min of rest and 10 min of light after 3 hr since semen was collected. An aliquot without photostimulation was included as a control. After the photostimulation, the sperm cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C. Afterwards, motility, viability, intracellular Ca2+ level and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and peroxynitrite were analysed. The results showed that the photostimulated group maintained total motility throughout the time, whereas a significant decrease in total motility was observed in the nonphotostimulated control group. Furthermore, for kinetic parameters of motility, a significant increase was observed in LIN, STR and WOB in photostimulated spermatozoa. Peroxynitrite production was significantly increased in the photostimulated spermatozoa, whereas viability, ROS production and intracellular Ca2+ levels were not affected by photostimulation. In conclusion, photostimulation of commercial boar semen has a positive effect on motility of spermatozoa subjected to a short-term moderate thermal stress, which was concomitant with an increase in peroxynitrite production.

Does low-level laser therapy on degenerated ovine testes improve post-thawed sperm characteristics?

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) can modulate redox state of the cell which could be useful to treat testicular degeneration and also prevent injuries by sperm cryopreservation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of LLLT treatment on semen cryopreservation from rams submitted or not to testicular degeneration by testicular insulation. Eleven White Dorper rams were divided into four groups: animals that were not insulated (Control) and not treated (No Laser) (n = 2); animals that were not insulated and treated with LLLT (n = 3); animals that were insulated and not treated with LLLT (n = 3), and animals that were insulated and treated with LLLT (n = 3). Testicular insulation was performed using scrotal insulation bags for 72 h. LLLT treatment was 28 J/cm2 energy, 808 nm of wavelength, and 30 mW of power output, irradiated on testis for 15 days with an interval of 48 h. Three ejaculates from each ram were collected: before insulation, 23, and 59 days after insulation bag removal. Cryopreservation was performed of the third ejaculate. Sperm evaluation was performed before and after cryopreservation considering sperm motility, morphology, acrosomal and plasma membrane integrity, mitochondrial potential, and oxidative stress. As expected, cryopreservation had a negative effect on several sperm motility characteristics and sperm membranes. LLLT treatment did not improve sperm quality from rams submitted to testicular insulation. Thus, testicular insulation and cryopreservation effects on spermatozoa were not attenuated by LLLT in this study.

Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences.

Cell phones have become a vital part of everyday life. However, the health risks associated with their usage are often overlooked. Recently, evidence from several studies supports a growing claim that cell phone usage may have a detrimental effect on sperm parameters leading to decreased male fertility. Nonetheless, other studies showed no conclusive link between male infertility and cell phone usage. The ambiguity of such results is attributed to the lack of a centralized assay for measuring inflicted damage caused by cell phones. Study design, ethics, and reproducibility are all aspects which must be standardized before any conclusions can be made.

Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences

Cell phones have become a vital part of everyday life. However, the health risks associated with their usage are often overlooked. Recently, evidence from several studies supports a growing claim that cell phone usage may have a detrimental effect on sperm parameters leading to decreased male fertility. Nonetheless, other studies showed no conclusive link between male infertility and cell phone usage. The ambiguity of such results is attributed to the lack of a centralized assay for measuring inflicted damage caused by cell phones. Study design, ethics, and reproducibility are all aspects which must be standardized before any conclusions can be made.