Cardiorenal Syndromes and Their Role in Water and Sodium Homeostasis.

Sodium is the main osmotically active ion in the extracellular fluid and its concentration goes hand in hand with fluid volume. Under physiological conditions, homeostasis of sodium and thus amount of fluid is regulated by neural and humoral interconnection of body tissues and organs. Both heart and kidneys are crucial in maintaining volume status. Proper kidney function is necessary to excrete regulated amount of water and solutes and adequate heart function is inevitable to sustain renal perfusion pressure, oxygen supply etc. As these organs are bidirectionally interconnected, injury of one leads to dysfunction of another. This condition is known as cardiorenal syndrome. It is divided into five subtypes regarding timeframe and pathophysiology of the onset. Hemodynamic effects include congestion, decreased cardiac output, but also production of natriuretic peptides. Renal congestion and hypoperfusion leads to kidney injury and maladaptive activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system. In cardiorenal syndromes sodium and water excretion is impaired leading to volume overload and far-reaching negative consequences, including higher morbidity and mortality of these patients. Keywords: Cardiorenal syndrome, Renocardiac syndrome, Volume overload, Sodium retention.

Hepato-Cardio-Renal Syndrome.

Hepatorenal syndrome has conventionally been regarded as a multisystem syndrome in which pathophysiologic pathways that link cirrhosis with impairment in kidney function are followed by dysfunction of several organs such as the heart. The advances in cardiac studies have helped diagnose more subtle cardiac abnormalities that would have otherwise remained unnoticed in a significant subset of patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis. Accumulating data suggests that in many instances, the cardiac dysfunction precedes and predicts development of kidney disease in such patients. These observations point to the heart as a key player in hepatorenal syndrome and challenge the notion that the cardiac abnormalities are either the consequence of aberrancies in hepatorenal interactions or have only minor effects. As such, the disturbances traditionally bundled within hepatorenal syndrome may indeed represent a hepatic form of cardiorenal syndrome whereby the liver affects the kidney in part through cardiorenal pathways (that is, hepato-cardio-renal syndrome).

Rat Models of Cardiorenal Syndrome and Methods for Functional Assessment.

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a clinical disorder involving combined heart and kidney dysfunction, which leads to poor clinical outcomes. To understand the complex pathophysiology and mechanisms that lie behind this disease setting, and design/evaluate appropriate treatment strategies, suitable animal models are required. Described here are the protocols for establishing surgically induced animal models of CRS including important methods to determine clinically relevant measures of cardiac and renal function, commonly used to assess the degree of organ dysfunction in the model and treatment efficacy when evaluating novel therapeutic strategies.

Practical Approaches to the Management of Cardiorenal Disease beyond Congestion.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of heart and kidney diseases, also called cardiorenal syndrome, is very common, leads to increased morbidity and mortality, and poses diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. There is a risk-treatment paradox, such that patients with the highest risk are treated with lesser disease-modifying medical therapies. SUMMARY: In this document, different scientific societies propose a practical approach to address and optimize cardiorenal therapies and related comorbidities systematically in chronic cardiorenal disease beyond congestion. Cardiorenal programs have emerged as novel models that may assist in delivering coordinated and holistic management for these patients. KEY MESSAGES: (1) Cardiorenal disease is a ubiquitous entity in clinical practice and is associated with numerous barriers that limit medical treatment. (2) The present article focuses on the practical approaches to managing chronic cardiorenal disease beyond congestion to overcome some of these barriers and improve the treatment of this high-risk population.

Cell-Specific Targeting of the Endothelium in the Cardiorenal Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The vascular endothelium serves as a semi-selective permeable barrier as a conduit for transport of fluid, solutes, and various cell populations between the vessel lumen and tissues. The endothelium thus has a dynamic role in the regulation of coagulation, immune system, lipid and electrolyte transport, as well as neurohumoral influences on vascular tone and end-organ injury to tissues such as the heart and kidney. SUMMARY: Within this framework, pharmacologic strategies for heart and kidney diseases including blood pressure, glycemic control, and lipid reduction provide significant risk reduction, yet certain populations are at risk for substantial residual risk for disease progression and treatment resistance and often have unwanted off-target effects leaving the need for adjunct, alternative targeted therapies. Recent advances in techniques in sequencing and spatial transcriptomics have paved the way for the development of new therapies for targeting heart and kidney disease that include various gene, cell, and nano-based therapies. Cell-specific endothelium-specific targeting of viral vectors will enable their use for the treatment of heart and kidney diseases with gene therapy that can avoid unwanted off-target effects, improve treatment resistance, and reduce residual risk for disease progression. KEY MESSAGES: The vascular endothelium is an important therapeutic target for chronic kidney and cardiovascular diseases. Developing endothelial-specific gene therapies can benefit patients who develop resistance to current treatments.

Practical Requirements for the Development of an Advanced Cardiorenal Unit.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is frequently associated with kidney disease, and patients with kidney disease are at increased risk of heart failure. The co-occurrence of both entities not only significantly increases morbidity and mortality but also complicates therapy. SUMMARY: Cardiorenal syndrome often requires a broad, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary approach. As a result, a need has arisen to create specialized cardiorenal units that allow for rigorous and personalized management of this condition. Moreover, in some cases, cardiorenal syndrome is more complex, owing to an acute and critical situation that requires the concept of the cardiorenal unit to be extended toward advanced diagnostic and therapeutic positions, thus confirming the need for an advanced cardiorenal unit. The creation of these units constitutes a real challenge, necessitating a specific multilevel action plan, covering governance and management, type of patient, personnel requirements, service portfolio, care process, information systems, and other resources. Specific lines of action must be proposed for each of the relevant points in order to facilitate development of these units, together with continuous evaluation of unit activity through specific indicators, and to detect areas for improvement. KEY MESSAGES: This study addresses the conditions and organizational characteristics that enable the creation, development, and continuous improvement of advanced cardiorenal units.

Cardiorenal Interactions in Acute Heart Failure: Renal Proximal Tubules in the Spotlight.

BACKGROUND: The maladaptive neurohormonal activation, an integral mechanism in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and cardiorenal syndrome, has a profound impact on renal sodium handling. Congestion is the primary reason for hospitalization of patients with HF and the main target of therapy. As sodium is the main determinant of extracellular volume, the goal is to enhance urinary sodium excretion in order to address excess fluid. The interventions to increase natriuresis have conventionally focused on distal nephron as the primary segment that counterbalances the effects of loop diuretics. SUMMARY: Recent developments in the field of cardiorenal medicine have resulted in a shift of attention to renal proximal tubules (e.g., emerging evidence on proximal tubular dysfunction beyond handling of sodium). Herein, we discuss the three main mechanisms of sodium transport in the proximal tubules with emphasis on their intrinsic links to one another as well as to more distal transporters of sodium. Then, we provide an overview of the findings of the most recent clinical studies that have tried to enhance the conventional decongestive strategies through simultaneous blockade of these mechanisms. KEY MESSAGE: Interventions aiming at renal proximal tubules have the potential to significantly improve our ability to decongest patients with acute HF.

Diabetes modulation of the myocardial infarction-acute kidney injury axis.

As there is cross talk in functions of the heart and kidney, acute or chronic injury in one of the two organs provokes adaptive and/or maladaptive responses in both organs, leading to cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by acute heart failure is referred to as type 1 CRS, and a frequent cause of this type of CRS is acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of AMI and also the risk of AKI of various causes. However, there have been only a few studies in which animal models of diabetes were used to examine how diabetes modulates AMI-induced AKI. In this review, we summarize findings regarding the mechanisms of type 1 CRS and the impact of diabetes on both AMI and renal susceptibility to AKI and we discuss mechanisms by which diabetes modulates AMI-induced AKI. Hemodynamic alterations induced by AMI could be augmented by diabetes via its detrimental effect on infarct size and contractile function of the noninfarcted region in the heart. Diabetes increases susceptibility of renal cells to hypoxia and oxidative stress by modulation of signaling pathways that regulate cell survival and autophagy. Recent studies have shown that diabetes mellitus even at early stage of cardiomyopathy/nephropathy predisposes the kidney to AMI-induced AKI, in which activation of Toll-like receptors and reactive oxygen species derived from NADPH oxidases are involved. Further analysis of cross talk between diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic kidney disease is necessary for obtaining a more comprehensive understanding of modulation of the AMI-AKI axis by diabetes.

The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial.

AIM: The main treatment strategy in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS1) is vascular decongestion. It is probable that sequential blockage of the renal tubule with combined diuretics (CD) will obtain similar benefits compared with stepped-dose furosemide (SF). METHODS: In a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial of CRS1 patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to SF or CD. The SF group received a continuous infusion of furosemide 100 mg during the first day, with daily incremental doses to 200 mg, 300 mg and 400 mg. The CD group received a combination of diuretics, including 4 consecutive days of oral chlorthalidone 50 mg, spironolactone 50 mg and infusion of furosemide 100 mg. The objectives were to assess renal function recovery and variables associated with vascular decongestion. RESULTS: From July 2017 to February 2020, 80 patients were randomized, 40 to the SF and 40 to the CD group. Groups were similar at baseline and had several very high-risk features. Their mean age was 59 ± 14.5 years, there were 37 men (46.2%). The primary endpoint occurred in 20% of the SF group and 15.2% of the DC group (p = 0.49). All secondary and exploratory endpoints were similar between groups. Adverse events occurred frequently (85%) with no differences between groups (p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: In patients with CRS1 and a high risk of resistance to diuretics, the use of CD compared to SF offers the same results in renal recovery, diuresis, vascular decongestion and adverse events, and it can be considered an alternative treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT04393493 on 19/05/2020 retrospectively registered.

Nicorandil Decreases Renal Injury in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Complicated With Type I Cardiorenal Syndrome.

ABSTRACT: Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a group of disorders in which heart or kidney dysfunction worsens each other. This study aimed to explore the improvement effect of nicorandil on cardiorenal injury in patients with type I CRS. Patients with coronary heart disease complicated with type I CRS were enrolled. Based on the conventional treatment, the patients were prospectively randomized into a conventional treatment group and a nicorandil group, which was treated with 24 mg/d nicorandil intravenously for 1 week. Fasting peripheral venous blood serum and urine were collected before and at the end of treatment. An automatic biochemical analyzer and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect B-type brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), serum creatinine (Scr) and cystatin C (Cys-C), renal injury index-kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) levels. The left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography. All measurements were not significantly different between the nicorandil and conventional treatment groups before treatment (all P > 0.05), and BNP, Scr, Cys-C, NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were decreased in the 2 groups at the end of treatment (all P < 0.05). Compared with the conventional treatment group, BNP, Scr, Cys-C, NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were more significantly decreased in the nicorandil group (all P < 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction was more significantly increased (P < 0.05). Therefore, nicorandil could significantly improve the cardiac and renal function of patients with type I CRS. This may prove to be a new therapeutic tool for improving the prognosis and rehabilitation of type I CRS.

Entresto protected the cardiomyocytes and preserved heart function in cardiorenal syndrome rat fed with high-protein diet through regulating the oxidative stress and Mfn2-mediated mitochondrial functional integrity.

This study tested the hypothesis that Entresto (En) therapy protected the cardiomyocytes and heart function in cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) rats fed with high-protein diet (HPD) through regulating the oxidative-stress and Mfn2-mediated mitochondrial functional integrity. En (12.5 µM for the in-vitro study) protected the H9C2-cells against H2O2-induced cell apoptosis, whereas stepwise-increased H2O2 concentrations induced a significant increase in protein expressions of Mfn2/phosphorylated (p)-DRP1/mitochondrial-Bax in H9C2-cells. En downregulated H2O2-induced mitochondrial fission/upregulated mitochondrial fusion and deletion of Mfn2 gene (i.e., shMfn2) to significantly reduce H2O2-induced ROS production. En significantly suppressed and shMfn2 further significantly suppressed both H2O2-reduced mitochondrial-membrane potential and H2O2-induced ROS production/cell apoptosis/mitochondrial damage/mitochondrial-Bax released from mitochondria in H9C2 cells. En significantly reduced protein expressions of Mfn2 and p-DRP1. Additionally, En significantly suppressed and shMfn2 further significantly suppressed the protein expressions of mitochondrial-damaged (DRP1)/oxidative-stress (NOX-1/NOX-2)/apoptosis (mitochondrial-Bax/caspase-3/PARP)/autophagic (LC3B-II/LC3B-I) biomarkers (all p < 0.01). Rats were categorized into group 1 [sham-control + high-protein-diet (HPD)], group 2 (CRS + HPD) and group 3 (CRS+ HPD + En/100 mg/kg/day). By day 63 after CRS induction, the LVEF was significantly lower in group 3 and more significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1, whereas the protein expressions of oxidative-stress (NOX-1/NOX-2/p22phox/oxidized protein)/apoptotic (mitochondrial-Bax/caspase-3/PARP), fibrotic (Smad-3/TGF-ß), autophagic (Beclin-1/Atg5/ratio of LC3B-II/LC3B-I) and mitochondrial-damaged (DRP1/cyclophilin-D/cytosolic-cytochrome-C) biomarkers exhibited an opposite pattern of LVEF among the groups. Downregulation of Mfn2 by En or shMfn2 in cardiomyocytes avoided H2O2 damage and En improved the cardiac function in HPD-feeding CRS rat via adjusting Mfn2-mediated mitochondrial functional integrity.

Variación de la presión intraabdominal en los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda según la fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda. Resultados del estudio PIA / Variation in intraabdominal pressure in patients with acute heart failure according to left ventricular ejection fraction. Results of an intraabdominal pressure study

Antecedentes El aumento de la presión intraabdominal (PIA) se ha correlacionado con elevación de la creatinina en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca con fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda gravemente deprimida (ICFEr). Sin embargo, dicha variable no se ha explorado en pacientes más estables o con insuficiencia cardíaca y fracción de eyección preservada (ICFEp). Pacientes y método Estudio observacional, prospectivo y descriptivo consistente en la medición de la PIA en pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) descompensada. Se estratificó la muestra según la fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda (FEVI) con un punto de corte del 50%, con el objetivo de analizar la PIA, así como las características basales y el grado de congestión empleando la ecografía clínica y la impedanciometría. Resultados Se incluyeron un total de 56 pacientes, 22 con ICFEr y 34 con ICFEp. Los pacientes con ICFEr presentaron una mayor prevalencia de cardiopatía isquémica (11 vs. 6; p = 0,010) y EPOC/asma (6 vs. 2%; p = 0,025). La PIA fue más alta en pacientes con ICFEr (17,2 mmHg vs. 13,3 mmHg; p = 0,004), sin diferencias en la función renal al ingreso según la FEVI (CKD-EPI creatinina) (ICFEr 55,0 mL/min/1,73 m2 [32,6-83,6] vs. ICFEp 55,0 mL/min/1,73 m2 [44,0-74,9]; p = 0,485). Los pacientes con ICFEr presentaron un perfil más congestivo estimado por ecografía (colapso de la cava inferior [26% vs. 50%; p = 0,001]), impedanciometría (agua corporal total al ingreso: 46 L vs. 41 L; p = 0,052 y a las 72 horas 50,2 L vs. 39,1 L; p = 0,038) y concentración de CA125 (68 U/mL vs. 39 U/mL; p = 0,037). Conclusiones Durante los episodios de descompensación los pacientes con ICFEr tienen mayor elevación de la PIA y un mayor grado de congestión sistémica (AU)

Background The increase in intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has been correlated with increased creatinine levels in patients with heart failure with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, IAP has not been examined in more stable patients or those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Patients and method We conducted an observational, prospective descriptive study that measured the IAP of patients hospitalised for decompensated heart failure (HF). The sample was stratified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with a cut-off of 50%. The objective was to analyse the IAP, the baseline characteristics and degree of congestion using clinical ultrasonography and impedance audiometry. Results The study included 56 patients, 22 with HFrEF and 34 with HFpEF. The patients with HFrEF presented a higher prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (11% vs. 6%; p = 0.010) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (6% vs. 2%; p = 0.025). The IAP was higher in the patients with HFrEF (17.2 vs. 13.3 mmHg; p = 0.004), with no differences in renal function at admission according to the LVEF (CKD-EPI creatinine) (HFrEF 55.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 [32.6-83.6] vs. HFpEF 55.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 [44.0-74.9]; p = 0.485). The patients with HFrEF presented a more congestive profile determined through ultrasonography (inferior vena cava collapse [26% vs. 50%; p = 0.001]), impedance audiometry (total body water at admission, 46 L vs. 41 L; p = 0.052; and at 72 h, 50.2 L vs. 39.1 L; p = 0.038) and CA125 concentration (68 U/mL vs. 39 U/mL; p = 0.037). Conclusions During the decompensation episodes, the patients with HFrEF had a greater increase in IAP and a higher degree of systemic congestion (AU)

Heart, kidney and left ventricular assist device: a complex trio.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome affecting the whole body, kidneys included. The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a valid option for patients with very severe HF. Focusing on renal function, LVAD implantation could theoretically reverse the detrimental effects of HF syndrome on kidneys. However, implanting an LVAD is a high-risk surgical procedure, and LVAD patients have higher risk of bleeding, device thrombosis, strokes, renal impairment, multi-organ failure and infections. Furthermore, an LVAD has its own particular effects on the renal system. METHODS: In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interaction between LVAD and the kidneys from the pathophysiological and clinical perspectives. An analysis of the different effects of pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow LVAD is provided. RESULTS: Despite their limitations, creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas help to stratify patients by their post-LVAD placement prognosis. Poor basal renal function, the onset of acute kidney injury or the need for renal replacement therapy after LVAD implantation negatively influences a patient's prognosis. LVAD can also prompt an improvement in renal function, however, with some counterintuitive effects on a patient's prognosis. CONCLUSION: It is still hard to say whether different trends in eGFR depend on different renal conditions before LVAD placement, on a patient's better overall status or on a particular patient management strategy before and/or after the device's implantation. Steps should be taken to solve this question because finding the best candidates for LVAD implantation is of paramount importance to ensure the best outcomes.

Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights Into the Cardiorenal Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The management of clinical heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is often complicated by concurrent renal dysfunction, known as the cardiorenal syndrome. This, combined with the notable lack of evidence-based therapies for HFpEF, highlights the importance of examining mechanisms and targetable pathways in HFpEF with the cardiorenal syndrome. METHODS: HFpEF was induced in mice by uninephrectomy, infusion of d-aldosterone (HFpEF; N=10) or saline (Sham; N=8), and given 1% NaCl drinking water for 4 weeks. Renal fibrosis and endothelial-mesenchymal transition (endo-MT) were evident once HFpEF developed. Human aortic endothelial cells were treated for 4 days with 10% serum obtained from patients with chronically stable HFpEF with the cardiorenal syndrome (N=12) and compared with serum-treated human aortic endothelial cells from control subjects (no cardiac/renal disease; N=12) to recapitulate the in vivo findings. RESULTS: Kidneys from HFpEF mice demonstrated hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis (1.9-fold increase; P<0.05) with increased expression of endo-MT transcripts, including pdgfrß (platelet-derived growth factor receptor ß), snail, fibronectin, fsp1 (fibroblast-specific protein 1), and vimentin by 1.7- (P=0.004), 1.7- (P=0.05), 1.8- (P=0.005), 2.6- (P=0.001), and 2.0-fold (P=0.001) versus Sham. Immunostaining demonstrated co-localization of CD31 and ACTA2 (actin α2) in kidney sections suggesting evidence of endo-MT. Similar to the findings in HFpEF mice, comparable endo-MT markers were also significantly elevated in human aortic endothelial cells treated with serum from patients with HFpEF compared with human aortic endothelial cells treated with serum from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These translational findings demonstrate a plausible role for endo-MT in HFpEF with cardiorenal syndrome and may have therapeutic implications in drug development for patients with HFpEF and concomitant renal dysfunction.

Fibrosis, the Bad Actor in Cardiorenal Syndromes: Mechanisms Involved.

Cardiorenal syndrome is a term that defines the complex bidirectional nature of the interaction between cardiac and renal disease. It is well established that patients with kidney disease have higher incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities and that renal dysfunction is a significant threat to the prognosis of patients with cardiac disease. Fibrosis is a common characteristic of organ injury progression that has been proposed not only as a marker but also as an important driver of the pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndromes. Due to the relevance of fibrosis, its study might give insight into the mechanisms and targets that could potentially be modulated to prevent fibrosis development. The aim of this review was to summarize some of the pathophysiological pathways involved in the fibrotic damage seen in cardiorenal syndromes, such as inflammation, oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress, which are known to be triggers and mediators of fibrosis.

Heat Shock Proteins: Connectors between Heart and Kidney.

Over the development of eukaryotic cells, intrinsic mechanisms have been developed in order to provide the ability to defend against aggressive agents. In this sense, a group of proteins plays a crucial role in controlling the production of several proteins, guaranteeing cell survival. The heat shock proteins (HSPs), are a family of proteins that have been linked to different cellular functions, being activated under conditions of cellular stress, not only imposed by thermal variation but also toxins, radiation, infectious agents, hypoxia, etc. Regarding pathological situations as seen in cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), HSPs have been shown to be important mediators involved in the control of gene transcription and intracellular signaling, in addition to be an important connector with the immune system. CRS is classified as acute or chronic and according to the first organ to suffer the injury, which can be the heart (CRS type 1 and type 2), kidneys (CRS type 3 and 4) or both (CRS type 5). In all types of CRS, the immune system, redox balance, mitochondrial dysfunction, and tissue remodeling have been the subject of numerous studies in the literature in order to elucidate mechanisms and propose new therapeutic strategies. In this sense, HSPs have been targeted by researchers as important connectors between kidney and heart. Thus, the present review has a focus to present the state of the art regarding the role of HSPs in the pathophysiology of cardiac and renal alterations, as well their role in the kidney-heart axis.

Comparative cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol in a rat model of cardiorenal syndrome type 4.

The incidence of chronic kidney disease is escalating; cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type 4 is gaining a major health concern causing significant morbidity and mortality, putting major burdens on the healthcare system. This study was designed to compare the cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol against CRS type 4 induced by subtotal 5/6 nephrectomy in rats and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Immediately after surgery, carvedilol (20 mg/kg/day) or atenolol (20 mg/kg/day) was added to drinking water for 10 weeks. Carvedilol was more effective than atenolol in improving kidney functions, decreasing elevated blood pressures, attenuating cardiac hypertrophy, reducing serum brain natriuretic peptide, and diminished cardiac fibrous tissue deposition. However, carvedilol was equivalent to atenolol in modulating ß1-adrenergic receptors (ß1ARs) and cardiac diacylglycerol (DAG) signaling, but carvedilol was superior in modulating ß-arrestin2, phosphatidyl inositol 4,5 bisphosphates (PIP2), and caspase 3 levels. Carvedilol has superior cardioprotective effects than atenolol in a rat model of CRS type 4. These protective effects are mediated through modulating cardiac ß1ARs/ß-arrestin2/PIP2/DAG as well as abating cardiac apoptotic signaling pathways (caspase3/pS473 protein kinase B (Akt)).

Renal negative pressure treatment as a novel therapy for heart failure-induced renal dysfunction.

Congestion is the primary pathophysiological lesion in most heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Renal congestion increases renal tubular pressure, reducing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and diuresis. Because each nephron is a fluid-filled column, renal negative pressure therapy (rNPT) applied to the urinary collecting system should reduce tubular pressure, potentially improving kidney function. We evaluated the renal response to rNPT in congestive HF. Ten anesthetized ∼80-kg pigs underwent instrumentation with bilateral renal pelvic JuxtaFlow catheters. GFR was determined by iothalamate clearance (mGFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by para-aminohippurate clearance. Each animal served as its own control with randomization of left versus right kidney to -30 mmHg rNPT or no rNPT. mGFR and RPF were measured simultaneously from the rNPT and no rNPT kidney. Congestive HF was induced via cardiac tamponade maintaining central venous pressure at 20-22.5 mmHg throughout the experiment. Before HF induction, rNPT increased natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR compared with the control kidney (P < 0.001 for all). Natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR decreased following HF (P < 0.001 for all) but were higher in rNPT kidney versus control (P < 0.001 for all). RPF decreased during HF (P < 0.001) without significant differences between rNPT treatments. During HF, the rNPT kidney had similar diuresis and natriuresis (P > 0.5 for both) and higher fractional excretion of sodium (P = 0.001) compared with the non-rNPT kidney in the no HF period. In conclusion, rNPT resulted in significantly increased diuresis, natriuresis, and mGFR, with or without experimental HF. rNPT improved key renal parameters of the congested cardiorenal phenotype.

Altered Amino Acid Metabolism in Patients with Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 2: Is It a Problem for Protein and Exercise Prescriptions?

The goal of this retrospective study was to document any alterations in plasma amino acids (AAs) in subjects with cardiorenal syndrome type 2 (CRS 2). We analyzed data from sixteen patients with CRS 2 and eight healthy subjects (control group, C), whose plasma arterial (A) and venous (V) AA concentrations had been measured. Compared to C, the group of CRS 2 patients showed significant reductions by more than 90% in A (p < 0.01) and V (p < 0.01) individual AAs, whereas negative A-V differences that indicated a net muscle AA release (muscle hypercatabolism) were found in 59% of CRS 2 patients (p < 0.03). No significant differences in plasma A and V AA concentrations nor in A-V differences were found between patients with mild kidney damage (N = 5; estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and patients with moderate-severe kidney damage (N = 11; eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Several plasma arterial AAs correlated with hemodynamic variables, but not with GFR. The study showed that patients with CRS 2 had very low concentrations of circulating AAs, independent of the degree of GFR damage.