Síndrome hemolítico urémico: estado actual / Where are we with haemolytic uremic syndrome?

El síndrome hemolítico urémico (SHU) se caracteriza por una anemia hemolítica microangiopática con deterioro de función renal. Actualmente se clasifica en SHU asociado a toxina Shiga y SHU atípico, y el mecanismo común consiste en un daño grave del endotelio vascular que origina una microangiopatía trombótica. Dentro del SHU atípico se engloban formas primarias, secundarias y debidas a enfermedades metabólicas. En la gran mayoría de casos de SHU atípico, la hiperactividad de la vía alternativa del complemento juega un papel patogénico central. El tratamiento se basa en el bloqueo de la formación del complejo de ataque de membrana, molécula final de la vía alternativa del complemento, con eculizumab, que ha revolucionado la historia natural de la enfermedad. La recidiva de la enfermedad en el trasplante es frecuente y con muy mal pronóstico para la supervivencia renal

Haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterised by microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia with acute kidney injury. It is currently classified into two main categories: Shiga-toxin producing E. coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Endothelial cell damage is the common pathway in HUS to developing thrombotic microangiopathy. Atypical HUS includes primary, secondary and aHUS due to metabolic diseases. In the majority of aHUS cases, hyperactivity of the alternative complement pathway plays a central role. Therefore, treatment is based on complement inhibitors like eculizumab, a drug that has revolutionised the natural history of the disease. Relapses are frequent after kidney transplant and thus confer a poor prognosis

Pathophysiology and treatment of typical and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare disease, frequently responsible for renal insufficiency in children. Recent findings have led to renewed interest in this pathology. The discovery of new gene mutations in the atypical form of HUS and the experimental data suggesting the involvement of the complement pathway in the typical form, open new perspectives for treatment. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on both typical and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome pathophysiology and examines new perspectives for treatment.

How I treat: the clinical differentiation and initial treatment of adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Published data demonstrating the efficacy of complement inhibition therapy in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) are remarkable in contrast to the historically poor long-term prognosis for aHUS patients treated with plasma-based therapy. Although both aHUS and acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) remain clinical diagnoses, an increased understanding of both conditions has improved our ability to differentiate aHUS from acquired TTP. These same data have also demonstrated the importance of a more rapid identification and diagnosis of aHUS as the recovery of end-organ injury present appears to be related to the time to initiate therapy with eculizumab. The diagnosis of acquired TTP can be confirmed by the finding of severely deficient ADAMTS13 activity (<10%) with evidence of an ADAMTS13 antibody inhibitor whereas merely deficient ADAMTS13 activity in the absence of an ADAMTS13 autoantibody is more consistent with congenital TTP. In the absence of an objective diagnostic test, clinicians must rely collectively on platelet count, serum creatinine, and ADAMTS13 activity in the context of the response to plasma exchange therapy to identify patients whose diagnosis is most consistent with aHUS, and thus be more likely to benefit from therapy with eculizumab.

Diagnosis and classification of hemolytic uremic syndrome: the Hungarian experience.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare disease with various etiologies, making the identification of the specific forms and appropriate treatment difficult. Therefore, clinical and laboratory data from these patients need to be analyzed in national and international registries. Herein we have described 47 Hungarian HUS patients with detailed laboratory and clinical data obtained between 2008 and 2010. METHODS: Blood samples and clinical data of 47 patients with HUS diagnosed according to characteristic clinical signs were submitted for diagnostic evaluation, including complement protein and genetic analysis, measurement of ADAMTS13 activity and antibody analysis against O157LPS and factor H. RESULTS: There were 8 patients with typical diarrhea-positive HUS; 13 with atypical HUS (aHUS) and 26 with secondary HUS/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura group characterized by signs of complement consumption and decreased ADAMTS13 activity. Thus, decreased total alternative pathway activity is a promising diagnostic parameter with good sensitivity for aHUS. CONCLUSIONS: These observations highlight the requirement for multiple diagnostic tests together with clinical data to identify the specific cause of HUS. Because the long-term prognosis of aHUS, eg, graft survival after renal transplantation, may vary according to the molecular etiology, it is important for all affected patients to undergo a detailed molecular diagnosis of the disease. There is a clear clinical need for the development and application of novel assay in this field to allow more rapid efficient diagnosis of patients who undergo a first episode of HUS.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in the United Kingdom.

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is associated with a poor prognosis with regard to survival at presentation, recovery of renal function and transplantation. It is now established that aHUS is a disease of complement dysregulation with mutations in the genes encoding both complement regulators and activators, and autoantibodies against the complement regulator factor H. Identification of the underlying molecular abnormality in an individual patient can now help to guide their future management. In these guidelines we make recommendations for the investigation and management of aHUS patients both at presentation and in the long-term. We particularly address the role of renal transplantation alone and combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Anti-Factor H autoantibodies in a fifth renal transplant recipient with atypical hemolytic and uremic syndrome.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) associated with anti-Factor H (anti-FH) autoantibodies is a recently described pathophysiological entity. Monitoring of anti-FH IgG titer may be a sensitive marker of disease activity and guide treatment to eliminate circulating anti-FH antibodies. We report here a case of atypical HUS (aHUS) in which anti-FH autoantibodies were detected during the course of a fifth kidney transplant, 30 years after the first flare of aHUS. This exceptional case suggests that early, specific management based on immunosuppressive therapy and plasma exchanges monitored by anti-FH IgG titer may result in long-term graft survival.

Thrombotic microangiopathies: towards a pathophysiology-based classification.

Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) encompass various diseases characterized by a microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, platelet clumping, and organ failure of variable severity. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a particularly severe form of TMA characterized by systemic organ failure which results from a severe defect in ADAMTS13, a plasma enzyme specifically involved in the cleavage of highly hemostatic unusually large (UL) von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers into smaller and less adhesive VWF forms. Failure to degrade these UL-VWF multimers leads to excessive platelet aggregates and capillary occlusion. ADAMTS13 deficiency results from bi-allelic mutations in hereditary TTP, whereas in acquired forms it results from autoantibodies that alter the protein function. Patients with acquired idiopathic TTP have a trend to develop autoimmunity, since a clinical context of autoimmunity may be found in 30 p. cent of cases. Moreover, the remarkable efficiency of monoclonal antibodies directed against CD20 antigen of B lymphocytes in refractory or chronic relapsing forms provides an additional indirect argument to consider acquired TTP as an autoimmune disease. Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterized prominently by a renal failure. In most cases, HUS is caused by entero-hemorrhagic Escherichia coli (diarrhea-positive HUS). Diarrhea-negative HUS, termed atypical HUS, was associated with a dysfunction in complement pathway involving mutations in factor H, factor I, CD46/MCP, factor B and C3 components. The major improvement in our understanding of TMA pathophysiology allows now a more accurate molecular classification of TMA syndromes, which opens fascinating perspectives of targeted therapies in the forthcoming years.

TTP/HUS and prognosis: the syndrome and the disease(s).

Patients presenting with the syndrome of microangiopathic hemolysis and thrombocytopenia, without Shiga toxin-associated colitis, have thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS). Prognosis for TTP/HUS has changed over time from a fatal disorder associated with the classic pentad to a syndrome associated with 80% survival in the plasma exchange era. A growing number of mechanisms, including but not exclusive to severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, are now understood to result in this syndrome, and the prognosis of patients with TTP/HUS is related to many additional factors. This update on prognosis explores recent registry data studying both acquired idiopathic and also familial or recurrent forms of TTP/HUS, to delineate how mortality varies by underlying disease mechanism. This paper also explores the association between mortality and clinical presenting features, as well as whether the case is a primary or relapsed presentation. Recent data support an understanding of TTP/HUS as a heterogeneous syndrome with variable mortality, and with specific subgroups demonstrating an excellent outcome.

The thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndromes: overview of pathogenesis (Experience of The Oklahoma TTP-HUS Registry, 1989-2007).

The Oklahoma TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura)-HUS (hemolytic uremic syndrome) Registry, an inception cohort of 382 consecutive patients with TTP-HUS, provides a complete community perspective of these syndromes. TTP is the diagnostic term used for all adults, with or without neurologic or renal abnormalities; it is typically an acquired disorder; it may rarely result from congenital ADAMTS13 deficiency. HUS is the term used for children who have renal failure, most often caused by Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection; it may rarely result from congenital abnormalities of complement regulation. Clinical categories related to associated conditions and potential etiologies provide a structure for describing pathogenesis of the acquired syndromes. (1) Following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; a disorder primarily affecting kidneys described as transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. (2) Pregnancy-associated; pregnancy is a prominent risk factor for the development of TTP. (3) Drug-associated; acute, immune-mediated systemic syndromes and also dose-dependent renal toxicity. (4) Bloody diarrhea prodrome, suggesting an enteric infectious etiology. (5) Presence of an additional autoimmune disorder. (6) Idiopathic. A severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity contributes to the pathogenesis of many idiopathic patients and also some patients who present during pregnancy, with bloody diarrhea, or who have additional autoimmune disorders.

[Haemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: classification based on molecular etiology and review of recent developments in diagnostics]. / A hemolitikus urémiás szindróma és a trombotikus thrombocytopeniás purpura molekuláris szemléletu klasszifikációja és diagnosztikájuknak aktuális kérdései.

Haemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura are overlapping clinical entities based on historical classification. Recent developments in the unfolding of the pathomechanisms of these diseases resulted in the creation of a molecular etiology-based classification. Understanding of some causative relationships yielded detailed diagnostic approaches, novel therapeutic options and thorough prognostic assortment of the patients. Although haemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura are rare diseases with poor prognosis, the precise molecular etiology-based diagnosis might properly direct the therapy of the affected patients. The current review focuses on the theoretical background and detailed description of the available diagnostic possibilities, and some practical information necessary for the interpretation of their results.

What's new in haemolytic uraemic syndrome?

Recent advances in understanding the aetiology of the disorders that make up the haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) permit a revised classification of the syndrome. With appropriate laboratory support, an aetiologically-based subgroup diagnosis can be made in all but a few cases. HUS caused by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli remains by far the most prevalent subgroup, and new insights into this zoonosis are discussed. The most rapidly expanding area of interest is the subgroup of inherited and acquired abnormalities of complement regulation. Details of the pathogenesis are incomplete but it is reasonable to conclude that local activation of the alternative pathway of complement in the glomerulus is a central event. There is no evidence-based treatment for this diagnostic subgroup. However, in circumstances where there is a mutated plasma factor such as complement factor H, strategies to replace the abnormal protein by plasmapheresis or more radically by liver transplantation are logical, and anecdotal successes are reported. In summary, the clinical presentation of HUS gives a strong indication as to the underlying cause. Patients without evidence of EHEC infection should be fully investigated to determine the aetiology. Where complement abnormalities are suspected there is a strong argument for empirical and early plasma exchange, although rapid advances in this field may provide more specific treatments in the near future.

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae type 1-induced haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) can be classified according to the aetiology of the different disorders from which it is composed. The most prevalent form is that induced by shigatoxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and, in some tropical regions, by Shigella dysenteriae type 1. STEC cause a zoonosis, are widely distributed in nature, enter the food chain in different ways, and show regional differences. Not all STEC are human pathogens. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli usually cause attachment and effacing lesions in the intestine. This is not essential, but production of a shigatoxin (Stx) is. Because Stx are encoded by a bacteriophage, this property is transferable to naïve strains. Laboratory methods have improved by identifying STEC either via the toxin or its bacteriophage. Shigella dysenteriae type 1 produces shigatoxin, identical to Stx-1, but also has entero-invasive properties that enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) do not. Shigella patients risk bacteremia and benefit from early antibiotic treatment, unlike those with EHEC.

Síndrome hemolítico urémico / Hemolytic uremic syndrome

El síndrome hemolítico urémico incluye una triada clásica: anemia hemolítica microangiopática, trombocitopenia y disfunción renal aguda. Es preciso sospechar su diagnóstico en todo niño con historia de diarrea aguda sanguinolenta, para anticipar la evolución y las complicaciones que se asocian.

The Oklahoma Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura-Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Registry: the Swiss connection.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) was initially described as an uncommon and usually fatal disorder. With effective treatment it is more frequently diagnosed, the clinical presentations are more diverse, and long-term sequelae are becoming recognized. METHODS: Patient data are from The Oklahoma TTP-hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) Registry, an inception cohort of 348 consecutive patients with their first episode of clinically diagnosed TTP or HUS, 1989-2006. The Registry enrolls all patients in a defined region who are diagnosed with TTP or HUS and for whom plasma exchange treatment is requested. ADAMTS13 activity has been analyzed on 235 (93%) of 254 patients since 1995 at the University of Berne, Switzerland. Patients are described by clinical categories, related to their associated conditions and clinically apparent etiologies, and by the presence of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical spectrum of syndromes described as TTP is variable with multiple etiologies. Advances in clinical and laboratory investigation have provided better understanding of the pathogenesis of these syndromes, their clinical evaluation and management, and their long-term outcomes. In addition to new information about TTP, these studies provide a model for translational research to define the complete community spectrum of uncommon disorders.

[The clinical course and long-term outcome of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children]. / Vaiku hemolizinio ureminio sindromo klinikine eiga ir velyvosios baigtys.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children and the dependence of outcome on severity of the acute phase of the illness. We analyzed data of 20 children who were hospitalized and treated at the Clinic of Children's Diseases, Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital, during 1995-2006. Data were obtained from case histories and outpatient case records with the help of prepared questionnaire. The course of acute disease and health status were evaluated at discharge from hospital and at 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups. There were 8 boys and 12 girls in the study group; their age ranged from 3 months to 12 years. According to the clinical course of the acute phase of the illness, children were divided into two groups. Group A (severe course) consisted of 15 patients with blood leucocytosis (more than 20x10(9)/L) and signs of CNS involvement, who required renal replacement therapy. Group B (mild course) consisted of five children who did not have such symptoms. Twelve (60%) children underwent dialysis during acute illness; two patients died (10%). One (20%) patient in Group B had proteinuria, four (80%) had renal insufficiency, and three (60%) had arterial hypertension at discharge from hospital. Subsequently these changes disappeared, and 3 years later arterial hypertension was detected in 1 (25%) patient in Group B. Eight (61.5%) patients from Group A had renal insufficiency, nine (69.2%) had proteinuria, and two (15.4 %) had arterial hypertension at discharge from hospital. Three years later from the onset of the disease, two (20%) patients had arterial hypertension, proteinuria was detected in two (20%) patients, and renal insufficiency remained in six (60%) children. Our data revealed that the outcomes of the disease are strongly influenced by the severity of the acute phase of the illness.

Where next with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome?

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a systemic disease characterized by damage to endothelial cells, erythrocytes and kidney glomeruli. A "typical" form of HUS follows gastrointestinal infection with enterohemorrhagic E. coli (e.g. O157:H7). Atypical HUS (aHUS) is not associated with gastrointestinal infections but is sporadic or familial in nature. Approximately 50% of aHUS cases are associated with a mutation in one or more genes coding for proteins involved in regulation or activation of the alternative pathway of complement. The link between the disease and the mutations shows the important balance of the alternative pathway between activation and regulation on host cell surfaces. It also demonstrates the power of this pathway in destroying cellular targets in general. In this review we discuss the current knowledge on pathogenesis, classification, diagnostics and management of this disease. We indicate a comprehensive diagnostic approach for aHUS based on the latest knowledge on complement dysregulation to gain both immediate and future patient benefit by assisting in choosing more appropriate therapy for each patient. We also indicate directions in which therapy of aHUS might improve and indicate the need to re-think the terminology and categorisation of the HUS-like diseases so that any advantage in the understanding of complement regulatory problems can be applied to patients accurately.