The effect of marathon running on the lower extremity kinematics and muscle activities during walking and running tasks.

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common injury among runners, and it is thought that abnormal lower extremity biomechanics contribute to its development. However, the relationship between biomechanical changes after a marathon and PFPS injury remains limited. This study aims to investigate whether differences in knee and hip kinematics and lower extremity muscle activities exist in recreational runners before and after a marathon. Additionally, it aims to explore the relationship between these biomechanical changes and the development of PFPS injury. 12 recreational runners participated in the study. Kinematics and muscle activities of the lower extremity were recorded during walking (5 km/h) and running (10 km/h) tasks within 24 hours before and within 5 hours after a marathon. After the marathon, there was a significant decrease in peak knee flexion (walking: p = 0.006; running: p = 0.006) and an increase in peak hip internal rotation (walking: p = 0.026; running: p = 0.015) during the stance phase of both walking and running compared to before the marathon. The study demonstrates a decrease in knee flexion and an increase in hip internal rotation during the stance phase of gait tasks after completing a marathon, which may increase the risk of developing PFPS injury.

Immediate Improvements in Patellofemoral Pain Are Associated With Sagittal Plane Movement Training to Improve Use of Gluteus Maximus Muscle During Single Limb Landing.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to examine the immediate effects of movement training aimed at improving use of gluteus maximus (GMAX) in the sagittal plane on hip internal rotation and self-reported patellofemoral pain (PFP) during single-limb landing. METHODS: Seventeen females with PFP participated. Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics, GMAX activation, and self-reported PFP were obtained before and after a single-session movement training program aimed at increasing the use of GMAX. Dependent variables of interest included self-reported PFP, average GMAX activation, average hip extensor moment, and peak hip internal rotation. Post-training changes were evaluated using paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: Following movement training, self-reported PFP decreased significantly (mean [standard deviation]) (3.9 [1.1] vs 0.8 [1.3] on a 0-10 scale). Additionally, significant increases were observed for the average hip extensor moment (0.6 [0.3] vs 1.8 [0.4] Nm/kg) and average GMAX activation (41.0% [18.3] vs 51.6% [25.7] maximum voluntary isometric contraction), whereas peak hip internal rotation decreased significantly (8.5 degrees [5.8] vs 6.0 degrees [5.3]). CONCLUSION: Movement training aimed at improving the use of GMAX in the sagittal plane resulted in clinically relevant changes in self-reported pain, GMAX activation, and hip kinetics and kinematics. Improving the use of GMAX during movement merits consideration when designing rehabilitation programs for females with PFP. IMPACT: The current study highlights the clinical utility of movement training for persons with PFP and provides a biomechanical rationale for its use as a potential intervention in this population.

Gait retraining for runners with patellofemoral pain: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is highly prevalent in runners. Physical therapies were proved to be effective in the treatment of PFP. Gait retraining is an important method of physical therapy, but its effectiveness and safety for PFP remained controversial. Previous review suggests gait retraining in the treatment of PFP warrants consideration. However, recent publications of randomized controlled studies and case series studies indicated the positive effect of gait retraining in clinical and functional outcomes, which re-raise the focus of gait retraining. This paper will systematically review the available evidence, assessing the safety and effectiveness for the use of gait retraining for runners with PEP. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of relevant studies in Pubmed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library were synthesized. Inclusion criteria are studies evaluating clinical outcomes (i.e., changes to pain and/or function) following running retraining interventions in symptomatic running populations; Studies with less than 10 participants in total or in the running retraining intervention group were excluded. The primary outcomes measured will be pain score, Lower extremity functional scale and training related injuries or complications. Review Manager (Revman Version 5.3) software will be used for data synthesis, sensitivity analysis, meta regression, subgroup analysis and risk of bias assessment. A funnel plot will be developed to evaluate reporting bias and Begg and Egger tests will be used to assess funnel plot symmetries. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to assess the quality of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our aim is to publish this systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal. Our findings will provide information about the safety of gait retraining and their effect on reliving pain and improving function of lower limb on runners with PEP. This review will not require ethical approval as there are no issues about participant privacy.

Knee flexor strength, rate of torque development and flexibility in women and men with patellofemoral pain: Relationship with pain and the performance in the single leg bridge test.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between: (1) knee flexor strength, rate of torque development (RTD), and flexibility with pain level; (2) knee flexor strength and RTD with the performance in the single leg bridge test (SLBT) in women and men with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory-based study. PARTICIPANTS: 39 women and 36 men with PFP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knee flexor strength, RTD, and flexibility; performance in the SLBT, current, and worst pain level. RESULTS: Moderate to strong significant negative relationships were identified between the current pain level with knee flexor strength (r = -0.57 to -0.34) and flexibility (r = -0.44 to -0.35); and between knee flexor strength and RTD with the performance in the SLBT (r = 0.34 to 0.57) in women and men with PFP. Knee flexor RTD was not related to any pain level and no significant relationships were identified between the worst pain level with knee flexor strength and flexibility in women and men with PFP. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the potential value of assessing knee flexor strength and flexibility in women and men with PFP. The SLBT may be a useful tool to assess knee flexor muscle capacity in individuals with PFP in a clinical setting.

Effects of gait retraining with focus on impact versus gait retraining with focus on cadence on pain, function and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain: Protocol of a randomized, blinded, parallel group trial with 6-month follow-up.

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the most prevalent injuries in runners. Unfortunately, a substantial part of injured athletes do not recover fully from PFP in the long-term. Although previous studies have shown positive effects of gait retraining in this condition, retraining protocols often lack clinical applicability because they are time-consuming, costly for patients and require a treadmill. The primary objective of this study will be to compare the effects of two different two-week partially supervised gait retraining programs, with a control intervention; on pain, function and lower limb kinematics of runners with PFP. It will be a single-blind randomized clinical trial with six-month follow-up. The study will be composed of three groups: a group focusing on impact (group A), a group focusing on cadence (group B), and a control group that will not perform any intervention (group C). The primary outcome measure will be pain assessed using the Visual Analog Pain scale during running. Secondary outcomes will include pain during daily activities (usual), symptoms assessed using the Patellofemoral Disorders Scale and lower limb running kinematics in the frontal (contralateral pelvic drop; hip adduction) and sagittal planes (foot inclination; tibia inclination; ankle dorsiflexion; knee flexion) assessed using the MyoResearch 3.14-MyoVideo (Noraxon U.S.A. Inc.). The study outcomes will be evaluated before (t0), immediately after (t2), and six months (t24) after starting the protocol. Our hypothesis is that both partially supervised gait retraining programs will be more effective in reducing pain, improving symptoms, and modifying lower limb kinematics during running compared with the control group, and that the positive effects from these programs will persist for six months. Also, we believe that one gait retraining group will not be superior to the other. Results from this study will help improve care in runners with PFP, while maximizing clinical applicability as well as time and cost-effectiveness.

Anteromedial versus posterolateral hip musculature strengthening with dose-controlled in women with patellofemoral pain: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of adding anteromedial versus posterolateral hip musculature strengthening to knee strengthening in women with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University physiotherapy clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two women with PFP were randomized to receive either anteromedial (AMHG) or posterolateral (PLHG) hip musculature strengthening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were pain intensity by the numeric pain rating scale and function by the Anterior Knee Pain Scale in six weeks. Secondary outcomes were pain and function at six months, global perceived effect at six weeks and six months, pain in step down, isometric torque of abductors, adductors and hip rotators measured with hand-held dynamometer, and dynamic knee valgus by step down in six weeks. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in primary outcomes; however, no differences were found between groups in pain intensity and function in six weeks and the secondary outcomes. Group x time interaction found superior gains in abductor strength in the PLHG and increase in the strength of the adductors and internal rotators in AMHG. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the addition of anteromedial or posterolateral hip musculature strengthening to knee strengthening in improving pain and function in women with PFP.

Influence of symptom frequency and severity on hip abductor strength and endurance in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical measures of hip abductor strength and endurance of individuals with patellofemoral pain with more severe symptoms to those with less severe symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty participants with patellofemoral pain were divided three times into 2 groups according to three symptomatology criteria: functional capacity, pain frequency and pain severity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isometric strength evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer, endurance using maximum number of repetitions and maximum holding time, functional capacity using the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, pain frequency using a 2-category scale ("Less frequent" = 1-2 times a week; "More frequent" = >3 times a week) and pain severity using Numeric Pain Rating Scales. RESULTS: Participants with more frequent symptoms and with more severe pain were significantly weaker (10%, p = 0.04 and 16%, p = 0.001, respectively), and had less isometric (17%, p = 0.02 and 24%, p = 0.002, respectively) and dynamic (13%, p = 0.02 and 23%, p = 0.007, respectively) endurance compared to those with less pronounced symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted that hip abductor strength and endurance deficits are more pronounced in individuals with more severe and frequent pain.

The Effect of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis on Local and Widespread Hyperalgesia and Muscle Length in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Secondary Analysis of a Pretest-Posttest Clinical Trial.

CONTEXT: Localized and widespread hyperalgesia has been observed in patients with patellofemoral pain. Diacutaneous fibrolysis (DF) has shown to be effective in reducing pain in several musculoskeletal conditions including patellofemoral pain syndrome, but no studies have evaluated the effects of this technique in reducing localized and widespread hyperalgesia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of DF on the pressure pain threshold and muscle length tests in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. DESIGN: A single-group, pretest-posttest clinical trial. SETTING: University of Zaragoza. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six subjects with patellofemoral pain (20 males and 26 females: age 27.8 [6.9] y). INTERVENTION: Three sessions of DF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure pain threshold using a handheld pressure algometer (4 sites around the knee, on tibialis anterior muscle, and one remote site on the upper contralateral limb); muscle length test of the iliotibial band, rectus femoris, and hamstring muscles; and patient-perceived treatment effect score. RESULTS: The application of 3 sessions of DF significantly increased the pressure pain threshold in all sites at posttreatment evaluation (P < .001) and at a 1-week follow-up (P < .001). A significant increase in muscle length was also observed at the posttreatment evaluation (P < .001) and 1-week follow-up (P < .001). Ninety-seven percent of the patients reported subjective improvement at posttreatment and at 1-week follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study found that local and widespread hyperalgesia was significantly reduced after 3 sessions of diacutaneous fibrolysis and at the 1-week follow-up. A significant improvement on muscle length tests was also observed, with high clinical satisfaction among patients.

Static and Dynamic Quadriceps Stretching Exercises in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the effect of stretching exercise in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) who have inflexible quadriceps, which is one of the various causes of PFP syndrome. This study compares quadriceps flexibility, strength, muscle activation time, and patient-reported outcomes after static and dynamic quadriceps stretching exercises in patients with PFP who had inflexible quadriceps. HYPOTHESIS: Quadriceps flexibility and strength, muscle activation time, and patient-reported outcomes would improve with dynamic quadriceps stretching as compared with static quadriceps stretching exercises. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: Of the 44 patients included in the study, 20 performed static stretching and 24 performed dynamic stretching. Quadriceps flexibility was assessed by measuring the knee flexion angle during knee flexion in the prone position (the Ely test). Muscle strength and muscle activation time were measured using an isokinetic device. The patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale for pain and anterior knee pain scale. RESULTS: No significant differences in quadriceps flexibility and strength, muscle activation time, and patient-reported outcomes in the involved knees were found between the 2 groups (P values > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Quadriceps flexibility and strength, muscle activation time, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with PFP who had inflexible quadriceps showed no significant differences between the static and dynamic quadriceps stretching exercise groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both static and dynamic stretching exercises may be effective for improving pain and function in patients with PFP who have inflexible quadriceps.

Effects of Static and Dynamic Stretching With Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Who Have Inflexible Hamstrings: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) syndrome is closely associated with muscle tightness. However, studies regarding the effects of stretching exercises on PFP patients with inflexible hamstrings are scarce. The aim of the study was to compare the effects between static and dynamic hamstring stretching in patients with PFP who have inflexible hamstrings. HYPOTHESIS: Compared with static hamstring stretching, dynamic hamstring stretching will improve the parameters of hamstring flexibility, knee muscle strength, muscle activation time, and clinical outcomes in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: A total of 46 patients (25, static stretching; 21, dynamic stretching) participated. Hamstring flexibility was assessed according to the popliteal angle during active knee extension. Muscle strength and muscle activation time were measured using an isokinetic device. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the anterior knee pain scale (AKPS). RESULTS: There were no differences in hamstring flexibility and knee muscle strength of the affected knees between the groups (P > 0.05). Significantly improved muscle activation time and clinical outcomes of the affected knees were observed in the dynamic stretching group compared with the static stretching group (all Ps < 0.01 for hamstring, quadriceps, VAS, and AKPS). CONCLUSION: In patients with PFP who have inflexible hamstrings, dynamic hamstring stretching with strengthening exercises was superior for improving muscle activation time and clinical outcomes compared with static hamstring stretching with strengthening exercises. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians and therapists could implement dynamic hamstring stretching to improve function and reduce pain in patients with PFP who have inflexible hamstrings.

Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Although it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation? METHODS: Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation. RESULTS: Following pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = -0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = -0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.

Knee flexor strength and rate of torque development deficits in women with patellofemoral pain are related to poor objective function.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in knee flexor strength and rate of torque development (RTD) might be present in women with patellofemoral pain (PFP). In addition, maximal strength and RTD of the knee flexors and extensors might be related with subjective and objective function in women with PFP. However, both conjectures are still poorly understood. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do women with PFP have deficits in the maximal strength and RTD of the knee flexors and extensors during isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions? Is there a relationship between maximal strength and RTD of the knee flexors and extensors with subjective and objective function in women with PFP? METHODS: Fifty-six women with, and 46 women without, PFP participated. Maximal strength and RTD (to 30% and 60% maximal torque) during isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions of the knee flexors and extensors were assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Objective assessment included single leg hop test (SLHT) and forward step-down test (FSDT). Subjective assessment involved the anterior knee pain scale. RESULTS: Women with PFP had small to large deficits in maximal strength and RTD of the knee flexors and extensors during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions (Effect sizes: -0.43 to -1.10; p ≤ 0.016). Small to moderate correlations of maximal concentric and eccentric knee flexor strength and RTD with SLHT and FSDT (r = 0.28 to 0.41; p ≤ 0.037) were identified. Subjective or objective function were not correlated with maximal isometric knee flexor strength and RTD, or any knee extensor measures (p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Maximal strength and RTD deficits of the knee flexors and extensors were identified in this female PFP cohort, but they were unrelated to subjective function. The relationship of concentric and eccentric knee flexor strength and RTD deficits with poor objective function should be considered in future exercise trials for women with PFP.

Impaired performance of women with patellofemoral pain during functional tests.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance, reliability, and validity of functional tests between women with and without patellofemoral pain. METHODS: Twenty women with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain between 18 and 40 years of age and 20 age-matched pain-free controls participated in the study. All participants performed a set of five function tests: sitting-rising test, sit-to-stand in 30 seconds, stair-climb test, stair descent test, and six-minute step test. To investigate reliability, participants were assessed on two different days, seven days apart, by two independent investigators blinded to the results of the other investigator. Validity was evaluated through associations with the results on the Anterior Knee Pain Scale. RESULTS: Performance in the tests was worse in women with patellofemoral pain than in the control group for the sit-to-stand in 30 seconds (mean difference [MD] 3.4reps; 95%CI: 0.4, 6.4), stair-climb test (MD: 0.36s; 95%CI: 0.1, 0.63), and six-minute step test (MD: 45reps; 95%CI: 20, 70). No differences were observed for the sitting-rising and stair descent tests. All tests in both groups showed moderate to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.61 to 0.91 and 0.72 to 0.96, respectively). Finally, only the results on the sit-to-stand in 30 seconds test correlated with the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (r=0.44, p=0.047) in the patellofemoral pain group. CONCLUSION: Women with patellofemoral pain present lower performance on some functional tests. Functional tests are reliable in patients with patellofemoral pain, although they are not associated with the results on the Anterior Knee Pain Scale self-questionnaire.

Patellofemoral alignment, morphology and structural features are not related to sitting pain in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

BACKGROUND: Sitting-related pain is a common feature of patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, little is known regarding features associated with sitting-related PFP. The aim of this study was to determine whether sitting-related PFP is associated with patellofemoral alignment, morphology and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the patellofemoral joint (cartilage lesions, bone marrow lesions, fat pad synovitis). METHODS: 133 individuals with PFP were included from two unique but similar cohorts. Participants were classified into one of three groups based on their response to item 8 of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale: (i) problems with sitting; (ii) sitting pain after exercise; and (iii) no difficulty with sitting. All participants underwent 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to enable: (i) scoring of structural features of the patellofemoral joint with MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS); and (ii) patellofemoral alignment and morphology measurements using standardised methods. The association of sitting pain to bony alignment, morphology and MOAKS features were evaluated using multinomial logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, BMI; reference group = no difficulty with sitting). RESULTS: 82 (61.7%) participants reported problems with sitting, and 24 (18%) participants reported sitting pain after exercise. There were no significant associations between the presence of sitting pain and any morphology, alignment or structural characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that PFP related to sitting is not associated with patellofemoral alignment, morphology, or structural MRI features of the patellofemoral joint. Further research to determine mechanisms of sitting-related PFP, and inform targeted treatments, are required.

Internal and external focus show similar effect on the gait kinematics in patients with patellofemoral pain: A randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine how attentional focus during training influences the effects of a 6-week hip-knee strength training program on pain, function, strength, and kinematics in males and females with Patellofemoral pain (PFP). METHODS: Seventy-five males and females with PFP were randomly allocated to a group that trained with an internal focus (n = 25), a group that trained with an external focus (n = 25), or a control group (n = 25). All patients completed testing before (baseline) and after (posttest) the 6-week period. The primary outcome was pain, assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were function, hip muscles strength and lower extremity kinematics, assessed by Kujala Questionnaire, handheld dynamometer and a 2-D motion capture, respectively. All outcomes were measured at the baseline and after the 6-week intervention. Analysis of covariance was used to compare posttest outcomes among the groups while accounting for group differences in baseline performance. RESULTS: The hip-knee strengthening exercises resulted in improved knee valgus (ES(95 % CI) = 0.43(0.26 to 0.75), p = 0.03), and external rotator strength (ES(95 % CI) = 0.51(0.12 to 0.78), p = 0.03) for males and females who trained with an external compared to internal focus. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that males and females with PFP may benefit from completing a hip-knee strengthening training program with an external focus vs. an internal focus. Physical therapists and clinicians should consider using instructions that promote an external focus when implementing hip-knee strengthening training programs with PFP patients. This result could be strengthened or re-enforced by larger studies with longer follow up.

Are hip and knee kinematics and training load characteristics relate to pain intensity and physical function level in runners with Patellofemoral Pain?

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common running-related injury. Altered hip and knee kinematics and increases in weekly distance and running pace are often associated with PFP development and exacerbation. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are altered movements and training load characteristics (weekly distance and running pace) relate to pain intensity or physical function level in runners with PFP? METHODS: Forty recreational runners with PFP (20 males and 20 females) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Three-dimensional hip and knee kinematics were quantified during the stance phase of running. Weekly distance was defined as the average weekly kilometers of running and running pace as the average pace of the activity measured as minutes per kilometer. A visual analogue scale was used to evaluate worst knee pain during the last week. The anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) was used to evaluate knee functional score. A Pearson correlation matrix was used to investigate the association between each dependent variable (worst pain in the last week and AKPS score) and the independent variables (knee and hip kinematics, weekly distance and running pace). RESULTS: There was no significantly correlation between kinematic variables, pain and functional score for both males and females separately and combined. Weekly distance (km/week) was found to positively correlate to pain intensity (r = 0.452; p < 0.05) in females with PFP. A simple linear regression revealed that weekly distance was significant predictor emerged of pain in females with PFP. Females exhibited significantly greater peak hip adduction and hip adduction ROM than the males and males had significantly greater running pace compared to females. SIGNIFICANCE: Weekly distance should be considered in the clinical context during rehabilitation of PFP in females runners aiming at pain reduction.

Correlation of pain sensitization with muscle strength and angular kinematics in women with patellofemoral pain.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain has a poor long-term prognosis, which can be explained by a pain sensitization process. The pain sensitization process may be related to the increase of stress in the patellofemoral joint that is already associated with kinematic alterations and weakness in the musculature of the hip and knee. METHODS: Were compared the pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation, angular kinematics, and muscle strength between 26 patellofemoral pain and 24 asymptomatic women and then correlated pain sensitization variables with biomechanical variables in pain group. The pressure pain threshold was determined on seven points of the knee, tibialis anterior muscle, and elbow. Ten consecutive stimuli were performed for temporal summation, and cold water was used as the conditioning stimulus for conditioned pain modulation. The strength of hip and knee muscles was determined using a manual dynamometer. Three-dimensional kinematics were evaluated during the lateral step down, considering peak and excursion values of the movement and the Movement Deviation Profile. FINDINGS: The pressure pain threshold of the elbow (2.13 [1.84-2.41] vs. 1.63 [1.25-2] kg/cm2), all sites of the knee were lower, as well as the Movement Deviation Profile was higher (9.33 [9.20-9.46] vs. 12.43 [12.1-12.75]) in the pain group. No difference in temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation, muscle strength and discrete kinematic values were found. No significant correlation was found between the Movement Deviation Profile and pressure pain threshold. INTERPRETATION: Biomechanical factors, pain processing, and modulation in women with patellofemoral pain, when different from asymptomatic individuals, are not necessarily associated.

Women with patellofemoral pain and knee crepitus have reduced knee flexion angle during stair ascent.

OBJECTIVES: To compare trunk and knee biomechanics of women with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and knee crepitus during stair ascent. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory-based study. PARTICIPANTS: 29 women with PFP and knee crepitus (PFPCrepitus); 28 women with PFP and no knee crepitus (PFPNOCrepitus); 17 pain-free women with knee crepitus (Pain-freeCrepitus); and 29 pain-free women without knee crepitus (Pain-freeNOCrepitus). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak trunk flexion, peak knee flexion, mean knee angular velocity, knee extensor moment at peak knee flexion, peak and impulse of the knee extensor moment. RESULTS: PFPCrepitus group performed the stair ascent task with reduced peak knee flexion compared to Pain-freeCrepitus (p = 0.04; Effect size = -0.85) and Pain-freeNOCrepitus (p = 0.03; Effect size = -0.75). No significant differences among groups were found for peak trunk flexion (p = 0.979), knee angular velocity (p = 0.420), knee extensor moment at peak knee flexion (p = 0.933), peak (p = 0.290) and impulse (p = 0.122) of the knee extensor moment. CONCLUSION: Women with concomitant PFP and knee crepitus demonstrated reduced knee flexion during stair ascent, but no significant differences for trunk flexion and knee extensor moment variables were found.

Immediate Effect of Ankle Mobilization on Range of Motion, Dynamic Knee Valgus, and Knee Pain in Women With Patellofemoral Pain and Ankle Dorsiflexion Restriction: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 48-Hour Follow-Up.

CONTEXT: Restriction in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) has been previously associated with excessive dynamic knee valgus. This, in turn, has been correlated with knee pain in women with patellofemoral pain. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immediate effect of 3 ankle mobilization techniques on dorsiflexion ROM, dynamic knee valgus, knee pain, and patient perceptions of improvement in women with patellofemoral pain and ankle dorsiflexion restriction. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with 3 arms. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 117 women with patellofemoral pain who display ankle dorsiflexion restriction were divided into 3 groups: ankle mobilization with anterior tibia glide (n = 39), ankle mobilization with posterior tibia glide (n = 39), and ankle mobilization with anterior and posterior tibia glide (n = 39). INTERVENTION(S): The participants received a single session of ankle mobilization with movement technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dorsiflexion ROM (weight-bearing lunge test), dynamic knee valgus (frontal plane projection angle), knee pain (numeric pain rating scale), and patient perceptions of improvement (global perceived effect scale). The outcome measures were collected at the baseline, immediate postintervention (immediate reassessment), and 48 hours postintervention (48 h reassessment). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 3 treatment groups regarding dorsiflexion ROM and patient perceptions of improvement. Compared with mobilization with anterior and posterior tibia glide, mobilization with anterior tibia glide promoted greater increase in dynamic knee valgus (P = .02) and greater knee pain reduction (P = .02) at immediate reassessment. Also compared with mobilization with anterior and posterior tibia glide, mobilization with posterior tibia glide promoted greater knee pain reduction (P < .01) at immediate reassessment. CONCLUSION: In our sample, the direction of the tibia glide in ankle mobilization accounted for significant changes only in dynamic knee valgus and knee pain in the immediate reassessment.

A Contemporary Approach to Patellofemoral Pain in Runners.

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is among the most common injuries in recreational runners. Current evidence does not identify alignment, muscle weakness, and patellar maltracking or a combination of these as causes of PFP. Rather than solely investigating biomechanics, we suggest a holistic approach to address the causes of PFP. Both external loads, such as changes in training parameters and biomechanics, and internal loads, such as sleep and psychological stress, should be considered. As for the management of runners with PFP, recent research suggested that various interventions can be considered to help symptoms, even if these interventions target biomechanical factors that may not have caused the injury in the first place. In this Current Concepts article, we describe how the latest evidence on education about training modifications, strengthening exercises, gait and footwear modifications, and psychosocial factors can be applied when treating runners with PFP. The importance of maintaining relative homeostasis between load and capacity will be emphasized. Recommendations for temporary or longer-term interventions will be discussed. A holistic, evidence-based approach should consist of a graded exposure to load, including movement, exercise, and running, while considering the capacity of the individual, including sleep and psychosocial factors. Cost, accessibility, and the personal preferences of patients should also be considered.