An acute phase reaction from zoledronate mimicking symptoms seen in opioid withdrawal: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronate, a bisphosphonate, is a potent first-line treatment for osteoporosis. It is also a preferred treatment for hypercalcemia especially when unresponsive to intravenous fluids. Bisphosphonates can cause acute phase reactions that mimic opioid withdrawal symptoms, which can confound provider decision-making. Our case highlights cognitive bias involving a patient with opioid use disorder who received zoledronate for hypercalcemia secondary to immobilization and significant bone infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old male is admitted with a past medical history of active intravenous opioid use complicated by group A streptococcal bacteremia with L5-S1 discitis and osteomyelitis, L2-L3 osteomyelitis, and left ankle abscess/septic arthritis status post left ankle washout. His pain was well-controlled by acute pain service with ketamine infusion (discontinued earlier), opioids, acetaminophen, buprenorphine-naloxone, cyclobenzaprine, gabapentin, and naproxen. Intravenous opioids were discontinued, slightly decreasing the opioid regimen. A day later, the patient reported tachycardia, diaphoresis, myalgias, and chills, which the primary team reconsulted acute pain service for opioid withdrawal. However, the patient received a zoledronate infusion for hypercalcemia, on the same day intravenous opioids were discontinued. He had no other medications known to cause withdrawal-like symptoms per chart review. Therefore, it was suspected that an acute phase reaction occurred, commonly seen within a few days of bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: Zoledronate, well known for causing acute phase reactions, was likely the cause of withdrawal-like symptoms. Acute phase reactions with bisphosphonates mostly occur in the first infusion, and the incidence decreases with subsequent infusions. Symptoms typically occur 24-72 h post-infusion, and last at most for 72 h. Cognitive bias led the primary team to be concerned with opioid withdrawal rather than investigating other causes for the patient's presentation. Therefore, providers should thoroughly investigate potential etiologies and rule them out accordingly to provide the best care. Health care providers should also be aware of the implicit biases that potentially impact the quality of care they provide to patients.

Measuring Objective and Subjective Sleep during Lisdexamfetamine Treatment of Acute Methamphetamine Withdrawal: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disturbance is common during methamphetamine (MA) use and withdrawal; however, the feasibility of combined subjective-objective measurement of sleep-wake has not been shown in this population. Actigraphy is a well-established, non-invasive measure of sleep-wake cycles with good concordance with polysomnography. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and utility of using actigraphy and sleep diaries to investigate sleep during MA withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a feasibility and utility study of actigraphy and sleep diaries during a clinical trial of lisdexamfetamine for MA withdrawal. Participants were inpatients for 7 days, wore an actigraph (Philips Actiwatch 2) and completed a modified Consensus Sleep Diary each morning. Participants were interviewed between days 3-5. RESULTS: Ten participants (mean age 37 years, 90% male) were enrolled. No participant removed the device prematurely. Participants interviewed (n = 8) reported that the actigraph was not difficult or distracting to wear or completion of daily sleep diary onerous. Actigraphic average daily sleep duration over 7 days was 568 min, sleep onset latency 22.4 min, wake after sleep onset (WASO) 75.2 min, and sleep efficiency 83.6%. Sleep diaries underreported daily sleep compared with actigraphy (sleep duration was 56 min (p = 0.008) and WASO 47 min (p < 0.001) less). Overall sleep quality was 4.4 on a nine-point Likert scale within the diary. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous actigraphy is feasible to measure sleep-wake in people withdrawing from MA, with low participant burden. We found important differences in self-reported and actigraphic sleep, which need to be explored in more detail.

Reliability and validity of the Estonian version of the Clinical Institute of Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol scale.

AIMS: Our aim was to adapt the Clinical Institute of Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar) into Estonian and test its reliability and validity. METHODS: A total of 72 patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome participated in the study. In order to assess the interrater reliability, at first assessment the CIWA-Ar was simultaneously completed by two nurses. In order to assess the sensitivity of the CIWA-Ar to the changes in the severity of the withdrawal syndrome, as well as its correlations to several indices characterizing the subjects' current condition, the CIWA-Ar, the Clinical Global Impression Severity subscale (CGI-S), the visual analogue scales for the assessment of the general feeling of malaise, anxiety and depression were filled in and the vital signs were measured at inclusion, in 4 h and after the withdrawal syndrome had been resolved. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the Estonian version of the CIWA-Ar total score, used as an indicator of interrater reliability, was excellent. The CIWA-Ar had significant correlations with the psychiatrists' CGI-S ratings of the severity of the patient's condition at all assessment points. Significant correlations were also found between CIWA-Ar and patients' self-ratings, the highest correlations found with self-rated anxiety and general feeling of malaise. CIWA-Ar total score did not correlate with simultaneously measured heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at the first assessment. At the second assessment, heart rate had a significant correlation with the CIWA-Ar total score. CONCLUSION: Our study provides confirmation that the CIWA-Ar tool is well applicable in the Estonian language and culture setting.

The possible clinical utility of the alcohol biomarker phosphatidylethanol for managing suspected alcohol withdrawal in hospitalized patients: A case report.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The decision to initiate pharmacotherapy for alcohol withdrawal is typically based on examining self-reported use of alcohol and symptoms of withdrawal. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker that could aim in clinical decision-making in withdrawal management. METHODS: This report describes three cases highlighting the potential clinical utility of PEth in caring for individuals at risk for alcohol withdrawal. RESULTS: Two of the cases received phenobarbital when their PEth showed that the risk of withdrawal was low and one case where PEth could have shown this was needed. The results were only available in a delayed fashion, however, could have been useful in informing clinical care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: PEth can be a useful tool if available without delay. PEth can be used to quickly rule out alcohol withdrawal and avoid misdiagnoses and prolonged hospital stays. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This is a clinical case study available looking at PEth and withdrawal in hospitalized patients. It proposes that PEth can be used as a way to quickly rule out alcohol withdrawal to avoid misdiagnoses and the possibility of a prolonged hospital stay.

Suicide attempt in a dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome in Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome (DAWS) results from the reduction or suspension of dopamine agonist medications; it encompasses mainly psychiatric symptoms, including suicidal behaviors. In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the impact of DAWS can be significant in terms of distress and disability; however, we must take this syndrome into account as a threatening condition because suicidal behaviors could be developing in the context of DAWS. Here we present a brief case of DAWS affecting a young man with PD, whom abruptly discontinued DA treatment and developed psychiatric symptoms within two weeks which led to a suicidal attempt.

Acute REM sleep behaviour disorder associated with alcohol withdrawal: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterised by the loss of REM sleep muscle atonia and the enactment of dreams. Acute RBD associated with alcohol withdrawal syndrome is known, but the studies are limited, particularly on its neurobiological underpinnings and management alongside the withdrawal state. This work attempts to address this using a case study and relevant literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male with alcohol dependence (for 20 years) reported new-onset terrifying nightmares and violent behaviours in his sleep precipitated by alcohol withdrawal states for the last 18 months. The polysomnographic finding of REM-without-atonia supported the diagnosis of RBD. He was treated with chlordiazepoxide 100 mg/day (gradually tapered and stopped) and thiamine supplements. Post-discharge, he remained abstinent and symptom-free during the three months of follow-up. DISCUSSION: RBD related to alcohol withdrawal syndrome has been previously described in a few anecdotal reports. Sudden withdrawal from central nervous system suppressants like alcohol is hypothesised to cause a homeostatic imbalance in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pathways and 'REM rebound', resulting in the clinical and polysomnographic picture of RBD. Benzodiazepines have been found to be useful in both RBD and alcohol withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome may present with acute RBD, which can be treated with a short course of benzodiazepine. However, further studies are needed to explore the long-term course of RBD in these patients.

Screening for Alcohol Use Disorder and Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Critical Care Patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based research indicates that subjective questionnaires should be eliminated in screening for alcohol use disorder and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critical care patients. However, transitioning clinicians away from these screening tools remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: To improve screening for alcohol use disorder and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the critical care setting by implementing an evidence-based alcohol use disorder screening tool and alcohol withdrawal syndrome protocol for critical care patients. METHODS: The project site was a 17-bed adult medical intensive care unit in a large, southeastern US teaching hospital. Interventions consisted of the elimination of previously used tools such as the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised and implementation of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale for alcohol use disorder screening and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and symptom-triggered benzodiazepine administration for alcohol withdrawal syndrome management. RESULTS: Alcohol use disorder screening among the critical care patient population increased by 49% from before to after the intervention. Of the patients at risk for withdrawal, 79% had an order for monitoring with the new intensive care unit alcohol withdrawal protocol in the postintervention group, compared with 35% who had an order for monitoring with the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised in the preintervention group. CONCLUSION: The elimination of previously used tools and the implementation of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale and the new intensive care unit alcohol withdrawal protocol improved alcohol use disorder screening and alcohol withdrawal syndrome management among critical care patients.

Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease.

Alcohol-associated liver disease is a common and severe sequela of excessive alcohol use; effective treatment requires attention to both liver disease and underlying alcohol use disorder (AUD). Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can be dangerous, is a common barrier to AUD recovery, and may complicate inpatient admissions for liver-related complications. Hepatologists can address these comorbid conditions by learning to accurately stage alcohol-associated liver disease, identify AUD using standardized screening tools (eg, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test), and assess risk for and symptoms of AWS. Depending on the severity, alcohol withdrawal often merits admission to a monitored setting, where symptom-triggered administration of benzodiazepines based on standardized scoring protocols is often the most effective approach to management. For patients with severe liver disease, selection of benzodiazepines with less dependence on hepatic metabolism (eg, lorazepam) is advisable. Severe alcohol withdrawal often requires a "front-loaded" approach with higher dosing, as well as intensive monitoring. Distinguishing between alcohol withdrawal delirium and HE is important, though it can be difficult, and can be guided by differentiating clinical characteristics, including time to onset and activity level. There is little data on the use of adjuvant medications, including anticonvulsants, dexmedetomidine, or propofol, in this patient population. Beyond the treatment of AWS, inpatient admission and outpatient hepatology visits offer opportunities to engage in planning for ongoing management of AUD, including initiation of medications for AUD and referral to additional recovery supports. Hepatologists trained to identify AUD, alcohol-associated liver disease, and risk for AWS can proactively address these issues, ensuring that patients' AWS is managed safely and effectively and supporting planning for long-term recovery.

A Comparison of Injectable Diazepam and Lorazepam in the Goal-Directed Management of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal, yet the selection of a preferred benzodiazepine is limited due to a lack of comparative studies. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable lorazepam (LZP) and diazepam (DZP) in the treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit with a primary diagnosis of AWS. Subjects who received at least 12 LZP equivalent units (LEU) of injectable DZP or LZP within 24 hours of initiation of the severe AWS protocol were included. The primary outcome was time with Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) scores at goal over the first 24 hours of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included (DZP n = 89, LZP n = 102). Time with CIWA-Ar scores at goal during the first 24 hours was similar between groups (DZP 12 hours [interquartile range, IQR, = 9-15] vs LZP 14 hours [IQR = 10-17]), P = 0.06). At 24 hours, LEU requirement was similar (DZP 40 [IQR = 22-78] vs LZP 32 [IQR = 18-56], P = 0.05). Drug cost at 24 hours was higher in the DZP group ($204.6 [IQR = 112.53-398.97] vs $8 [IQR = 4.5-14], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DZP or LZP are equally efficacious for the treatment of severe AWS. LZP may be preferred due to cost but both medications can be used interchangeably based on availability.

Examining Adult Patients' Success with Discontinuing Long-term Benzodiazepine Use: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patients' experiences with benzodiazepine (BZD) discontinuation, which is thought to be challenging given the physiological and psychological dependence and accompanying potential for significant withdrawal symptoms. The marked decline in BZD prescribing over the past decade in the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system presents an important opportunity to examine the experience of BZD discontinuation among long-term users. OBJECTIVE: Examine the experience of BZD discontinuation among individuals prescribed long-term BZD treatment to identify factors that contributed to successful discontinuation. DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted between April and December of 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 21 Veterans who had been prescribed long-term BZD pharmacotherapy (i.e., > 120 days of exposure in a 12-month period) and had their BZD discontinued. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews with Veteran participants to learn about their BZD use and the process of discontinuation, with interviews recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were deductively and inductively coded and coded text entered into a matrix to identify factors that contributed to successful BZD discontinuation. KEY RESULTS: The mean age of interview participants was 63.0 years (standard deviation 3.9); 94.2% were male and 76.2% were white. Of 21 participants, only 1 had resumed BZD treatment (prescribed by a non-VA clinician). Three main factors influenced success with discontinuation: (1) participants' attitudes toward BZDs (e.g., risks of long-term use, perceived lack of efficacy, potential for dependence); (2) limited withdrawal symptoms; and (3) effective alternatives, either from their clinician (e.g., medication, psychotherapy) or identified by participants. CONCLUSIONS: BZD discontinuation after long-term use is relatively well tolerated, and participants appreciated reducing their medication exposure, particularly to one associated with physical dependence. These findings may help reduce both patient and clinician anxiety related to BZD discontinuation.

Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome in Children in the PICU: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review literature describing the clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment for dexmedetomidine withdrawal in the PICU (PROSPERO: CRD42022307178). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were published from January 2000 to January 2022 and reported clinical data for patients younger than 21 years old following discontinuation of dexmedetomidine after greater than or equal to 24 hours of infusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts identified during an initial search were screened and data were manually abstracted after full-text review of eligible articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Summary statistics were provided and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to identify relationships between covariates and withdrawal signs. A weighted prevalence for each withdrawal sign was generated using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies (22 of which were retrospective cohort studies) containing 28 distinct cohorts were included. Median cumulative dexmedetomidine exposure by dose was 105.95 µg/kg (range, 30-232.7 µg/kg), median dexmedetomidine infusion duration was 131.75 hours (range, 20.5-525.6 hr). Weighted estimates for proportion (95% CI) of subjects experiencing withdrawal signs across all cohorts were: hypertension 0.34 (range, 0.0-0.92), tachycardia 0.26 (range, 0.0-0.87), and agitation 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.77). Meta-analysis revealed no correlation between dexmedetomidine exposure variables and withdrawal signs. A moderate negative monotonic relationship existed between the proportion of patients who had undergone cardiac surgery and the proportion experiencing hypertension (correlation coefficient, -0.47; p = 0.048) and tachycardia (correlation coefficient, -0.57; p = 0.008), indicating that in cohorts with a higher proportion of patients who were postcardiac surgery, there were fewer occurrences of hypertension and or tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: On review of the 2000-2022 literature, dexmedetomidine withdrawal may be characterized by tachycardia, hypertension, or agitation, particularly with higher cumulative doses or prolonged durations. Since most studies included in the review were retrospective, prospective studies are needed to further clarify risk factors, establish diagnostic criteria, and identify optimal management strategies.

Factorial, Construct, and Predictive Validity of the Motivation for Treatment Scale in Alcohol-Use Disorder Withdrawal Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to examine for the first time the factorial, construct, and predictive validity of the motivation for treatment (MfT) scale in a cohort of patients undergoing inpatient-qualified alcohol withdrawal treatment with the goal of referring patients to further treatment. The MfT scale has previously been evaluated in different settings of substance abuse treatment, revealing factorial ambiguity. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first study that conducted comprehensive factor analyses versus separate analyses of the factors conducted in prior studies in order to clarify the aforementioned factorial ambiguity. METHODS: A total of 249 patients (mean age 45.2 years (SD = 10.3); 34.4% females) with alcohol dependence were assessed. Data were obtained from four inpatient clinics specialized in qualified alcohol withdrawal treatment in Germany. First, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine the fit of the four models discussed in the literature. Second, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Correlations of the new factors with other motivational constructs and referral to a subsequent treatment were investigated as measures of construct and predictive validity. RESULTS: None of the four models showed an acceptable fit to the data in confirmatory analyses. The exploratory analysis suggested to eliminate seven items because of inappropriate factor loadings and resulted in a shortened MfT scale, which consists of three factors based on 17 items. For the latent variables "problem recognition," "desire for help," and "treatment readiness," satisfactory composite reliability was found with 0.82, 0.80, and 0.78, respectively. Evidence for predictive validity was found in the correlation between "treatment readiness" and referral to a subsequent treatment. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The new shortened MfT scale exhibited remarkable parsimony, which is desirable in settings such as withdrawal treatment, where patients frequently are cognitively or physically impaired. Despite its briefness, construct and predictive validity were better than in the original version of the MfT scale. The factorial validity of the suggested scale needs to be corroborated in further research.

Atypical Withdrawal Symptoms after Abrupt Tramadol Discontinuation: A Case Report.

Tramadol is a commonly utilized analgesic in the United States. One common misconception is that tramadol is safer than other opioid medications, or less likely to cause physical dependence. Given these misconceptions, the likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal after discontinuation may be commonly overlooked as well. A 68-year old female patient with fibromyalgia was referred to a clinical pharmacy pain clinic for medication management. The patient was evaluated one month after abrupt discontinuation of tramadol 50 mg every 6 h for at least 10 years of use. She reports concerning symptoms of significant mucus production, fullness in chest and soreness in neck. Although tramadol is a Schedule IV Controlled Substance the risk of physical dependence and likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal symptoms after abrupt cessation should not be diminished. Tramadol should not be considered a "safer" opioid therapy without potential of classic or atypical withdrawal symptoms, as well as risk of abuse, misuse or addiction.

[Assessment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: new perspectives]. / Az alkoholmegvonásos szindróma ellátása: új perspektívák.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is one of the most important consequences of alcohol use disorder, a complex neuropsychiatric disorder, which is firstly treated in non-specific and secondly in psychiatric/addictive in- or outpatient units. On the other hand, alcohol withdrawal syndrome is one of the most important outcomes of the severity of alcohol use disorder, further, it can lead to the development of alcohol-related seizure and delirium tremens. Hence, early recognition and optimal treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome have a critical importance. Therefore, the main goal of the present review was - by systematically summarizing the scientific data published during the past two decades - to form a unique diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. During the recognition and the course of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised scale, while in the risk assessment the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale are the recommended psychometric tools. Benzodiazepines are the key elements of the pharmacotherapy of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Many studies have evaluated that diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam and oxazepam with distinct indications have sufficient evidence in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. However, in the past few years some authors have recommended the importance of non-benzodiazepine medications. The efficacy of propofol, phenobarbital, carbamazepin, oxcarbamazepin and alpha-2 receptor agonists in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome have been revealed. Furthermore, it has been evaluated that benzodiazepines are recommended in the treatment of alcohol-related seizure and delirium tremens. In the present review, our aim was to construct a unique, up-to-date diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm by summarizing the related papers published during the past two decades. Hence this scheme may be useful in the optimal treatment of patients diagnosed with alcohol use disorder and it could help to conduct further clinical researches. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(38): 1487-1496.

[Withdrawal syndrome following chronic use of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB)]. / Syndrome de sevrage lors d'une consommation chronique d'acide gamma-hydroxybutyrique (GHB).

Chronic use of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and its precursors can rapidly lead to physical dependence with the emergence of a withdrawal syndrome. This complication is similar to the one linked to alcohol or benzodiazepines. The onset of symptoms and specially neuro-psychiatric symptoms is, however, more rapid in the case of the GHB and precursors. There is currently no consensus on the therapeutic management of GHB withdrawal syndrome. High-dose benzodiazepines are the most commonly used treatment. The use of GHB by titration and tapering could show fewer side effects and withdrawal symptoms. It appears necessary to reflect on and pursue research on the use of GHB and its precursors, which remains poorly understood, on the management of withdrawal syndrome due to the lack of protocol and on its probably underestimated impact on public health.

La consommation chronique d'acide gamma-hydroxybutyrique (GHB) et de ses précurseurs peut rapidement entraîner une dépendance physique avec l'émergence d'un syndrome de sevrage à l'arrêt des consommations. Ce syndrome de sevrage présente des similitudes avec celui lié à l'alcool ou aux benzodiazépines. On retrouvera, cependant, une apparition et une évolution plus brutales ainsi que l'émergence, plus précoce, de symptômes neuropsychiatriques. Il n'y a actuellement pas de consensus concernant la prise en charge thérapeutique de ce syndrome de sevrage. Dès lors, le recours aux benzodiazépines à hautes doses constitue le traitement le plus régulièrement utilisé. L'utilisation de GHB médical, titré et avec une posologie progressivement diminuée, pourrait démontrer moins d'effets secondaires et de symptômes de sevrage. Il apparaît nécessaire de réfléchir et de poursuivre les recherches sur la consommation du GHB et ses précurseurs, qui reste largement méconnue, ainsi que sur la prise en charge du sevrage, au vu de l'absence de protocole et de son impact en santé publique, probablement sous-estimé.