Myofascial Pain as an Unseen Comorbidity in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to identify, summarize, and appraise the evidence supporting the coexistence of myofascial pain (MPS) and trigger points (MTrP) in osteoarthritis (OA), and the effectiveness of MTrPs treatments in OA-related pain and physical function outcomes. METHODS: Three databases were searched from inception to June 2022. We included observational and experimental studies to fulfill our 2 study aims. Two independent reviewers conducted 2-phase screening procedures and risk of bias using checklist tools for cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, and randomized control trials. Patient characteristics, findings of active and latent MTrPs in relevant muscles, treatments, and pain and physical function outcomes were extracted from low-risk bias studies. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 2898 articles, of which 6 observational and 7 experimental studies had a low bias risk and the data extracted. Active MTrPs in knee OA patients was more evident in the quadriceps and hamstring muscles than in healthy individuals. Dry needling on active MTrPs improved pain and physical function in the short term compared with sham treatment in hip OA patients. In knee OA, dry needling on latent or active MTrPs improved pain and functional outcomes compared with sham needling but did not result in better pain and physical outcomes when combined with a physical exercise program. DISCUSSION: The presence of active versus latent MTrPs seems to be a more sensitive discriminating feature of OA given that latent is often present in OA and healthy individuals. Dry needling on active MTrPs improved pain and physical function in the short term compared with sham treatment in hip OA patients. However, the small sample size and the few number of studies limit any firm recommendation on the treatment. REGISTRY: The study protocol was prospectively registered in Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8DVU3).

Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Efficacy of Trigger Point Injection in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study (MyCar Study).

OBJECTIVE: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is caused by overload or disuse of skeletal muscles. Patients with cancer are often forced to restrict their movement or posture for several reasons. The study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and risks of MPS in patients with incurable cancer. The efficacy of trigger point injection (TPI) was also explored. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study. Patients with incurable cancer who started receiving specialist palliative care were enrolled. We investigated the MPS in this population and accompanying risk factors for restricting body movement. Pre- and post-TPI pain was also evaluated using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in patients who received TPI. The primary outcome was the prevalence of MPS. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled from five institutions in Japan. Most of the patients (n = 94, 93.1%) had distant metastases, and half of the patients (50, 49.5%) received anticancer treatment. Thirty-nine (38.6%) patients had MPS lesions at 83 sites. Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant risk factor for MPS was poor Performance Status (PS) (odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-9.02, P = .023). We performed TPI for 40 out of 83 MPS lesions. Mean NRS for MPS before TPI was 7.95, which improved to 4.30 after TPI (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: MPS was common in patients with incurable cancer and the risk factor identified in this study was poor performance status. TPI could be a treatment option.

Association of myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder region with depression, anxiety and stress among university students.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of myofascial trigger points in the shoulder and neck region, and to assess association with depression, anxiety and stress. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to September 2019 at Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan, and comprised students from different universities in Faisalabad. Myofascial trigger points were identified among the subjects using palpation method by a therapist. Depression anxiety stress scale was used to determine the level of depression, anxiety and stress. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 2000 subjects, 970(49%) were male and 1030(52%) were female. The overall age range was 18-25 years. Myofascial trigger points were present in 1727(86.4%) subjects and absent in 273(13.7%). The trigger points had significant association with depression, anxiety and stress (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Myofascial trigger points were quite common among university students and were associated with depression, anxiety and stress.

The association between myofascial trigger points and the incidence of chronic functional constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic functional constipation (CFC) is the most prevalent type of constipation. Considering the proven effect of pelvic floor muscles dysfunction in these patients' symptom and the fascial connection between pelvic floor and abdominal and lumbopelvic muscles, this study aimed to examine the possible relationship between this muscles and CFC. METHOD: We conveniently selected 100 patients with CFC and 100 healthy participants based on the Rome IV criteria. Two groups were asked to complete the international physical activity questionnaire and food frequency questionnaire. Then both groups were assessed for the presence of trigger points in more prevalent pain sites for each muscle by pressure algometer with 50% of their caught pressure pain threshold. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between two groups in the intake of calories, carbohydrates, proteins, sugar, fiber, vegetables, and wheat products. Patients had a higher consumption of fat and dairy products. for the physical activity level, a statistical difference showed that patients were less physically active. The comparison of the presence and the number of trigger points for each muscle in patients and control groups indicated more than 50% impairment, and there was a significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the relationship between myofascial trigger points of abdominal and lumbopelvic muscles and constipation. In addition to that, it seems that a sedentary life may influence CFC patients' condition. Moreover, it seems that the results of the dietary condition in patients could be because of conscious consumption of some certain foods.

Comparison of the prevalence of myofascial trigger points of muscles acting on knee between patients with moderate degree of knee osteoarthritis and healthy matched people.

INTRODUCTION: Trigger points have been implicated in the development of several musculoskeletal disorders. Trigger points harbored in lower limb muscles might represent a ubiquitous source of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of Myofascial Trigger Points (MTrPs) in muscles acting on the knee in patients with OA. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients aged at least 55 years old with a moderate degree of OA (grade III of Kellgren and Lawrence scale) were recruited. Thirty asymptomatic people, matched on age and body mass index, were considered as the control group. Ten muscles acting on the knee joint were selected. Taut bands were also identified using a skin rolling method. A pressure of 3 kg/cm2 was used to identify myofascial trigger points in all muscles except the popliteus (8 kg/cm2). RESULTS: Chi-square was performed to compare the prevalence of trigger points between the groups. The McNemar test was administered to compare the prevalence of trigger points in the right and left sides of participants. Prevalence of the trigger points was significantly higher in patients with knee OA compared with asymptomatic people in all muscles except for right (p = 0.17) and left (p = 0.41) rectus femoris, right (p = 0.61) and left (p = 0.22) sartorius and left biceps femoris (p = 0.08). Comparison of the prevalence of MTrPs bilaterally revealed that only the right and left sartorius differed significantly (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MTrPs in the muscles acting on the knee joint is higher in patients with a moderate degree of knee OA compared with asymptomatic subjects.

A critical overview of the current myofascial pain literature - January 2021.

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), trigger points (TrPs), and dry needling (DN) continue to be of interest to researchers and clinicians worldwide. In this quarterly overview, we included studies from 19 countries, including Pakistan, Iran, Spain, Israel, the US, Australia, Turkey, the UK, China, Italy, Germany, Brazil, Denmark, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, India, New Zealand, and Thailand. As encouraging as it may be that myofascial pain is being considered worldwide, it is frustrating how many studies do not include a proper control group making them not very useful. It is not clear why researchers would go through the trouble of setting up a study, which requires many hours of work and dedication, and not produce a meaningful paper for clinicians and researchers alike. Fortunately, several papers are high quality studies. This overview covers 39 basic research studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, clinical studies, and a few case reports.

Relación entre dismenorrea y síndrome de dolor miofascial. Perspectiva desde la fisioterapia. Estudio piloto aleatorizado / Relationship between dysmenorrhoea and Myofascial Pain Syndrome. A physiotherapist perspective. Pilot randomized trial

La dismenorrea es el conjunto de síntomas que se pueden padecer durante la menstruación, siendo el más característico un dolor intenso. El síndrome de dolor miofascial es el conjunto de signos y síntomas que producen los puntos gatillo miofasciales (PGM) tanto en su localización como a distancia, entre otros el dolor. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del estudio es estudiar la eficacia del tratamiento fisioterápico de los PGM en musculatura abdominal, aductora y del suelo pélvico para con la afectación de las variables de dolor, función sexual, calidad de vida, fuerza y movimiento en pacientes con dismenorrea. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio piloto aleatorizado. Se dividió a las participantes entre un grupo A (n = 6) donde se aplicó punción seca y terapia manual en musculatura abdominal, aductora de la cadera y suelo pélvico y grupo B (n = 7) donde se aplicó termoterapia y estiramientos en la misma musculatura. Las variables estudiadas fueron: dolor menstrual, función sexual, calidad de vida, rango de abducción de cadera, fuerza muscular, resistencia del suelo pélvico y existencia de puntos gatillo miofasciales. Una fisioterapeuta realizó los tratamientos y otra las valoraciones, estando cegada la segunda. RESULTADOS: el grupo A obtuvo una diferencia clínica (1,6 puntos menos en EVA) y estadísticamente significativa del dolor (p = 0,018), frente al otro grupo (0,4 puntos, p > 0,05), así como una mejora en la calidad de vida (p < 0,05) del grupo A. No se hallaron cambios significativos en el resto de las variables. CONCLUSIÓN: existe un alivio significativo del dolor y mejora de la calidad de vida del grupo A. Se considera así que el tratamiento específico del síndrome de dolor miofascial puede presentar mayor eficacia clínica. Se concluye la necesidad de continuar esta investigación con una mayor muestra de participantes, con el fin de esclarecer la eficacia del tratamiento de fisioterapia para el resto de las variables estudiadas

The term dysmenorrhoea defines different symptoms that women can feel during menstruation, the most common being intense pain. Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the combination of signs and symptoms caused by myofascial trigger points (MTP), at their site or at a distance. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment for MTP in the abdominal, hip adductor and pelvic floor muscles, from a physiotherapeutic approach, regarding the following outcome measures: pain, sexual function, quality of life, strength and mobility in patients suffering from dysmenorrhoea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized pilot study. Participants were divided into two groups: A (n = 6), where dry needling and manual therapy was applied to the abdominal, hip adductor and pelvic floor muscles; and B (n = 7), where the participants received thermotherapy and stretching of these muscles. The outcome measures studied were menstrual pain, sexual function, quality of life, hip abduction range of motion, strength of the affected muscles, pelvic floor muscle endurance and finding myofascial trigger points. All the treatments were provided by the same physiotherapist, while a different physiotherapist carried out the evaluations blinded to each patient's group. RESULTS: in group A, a clinically (1.6 less in VAS) and statistically significant reduction (p = 0.018) in pain was observed in comparison with group B (.4 in VAS, p > 0.05). Quality of life also improved in the first group (p< 0.05). No further significant differences were found in the remaining outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: a significant improvement was observed with regards to pain and quality of life in group A. Thus, we consider that specific treatment for MPS could be more clinically effective. We conclude that this research should be continued with a larger sample of participants, in order to clarify the efficacy of the physiotherapy treatment suggested for the remaining outcome measures

Prevalence And Impact Of Myofascial Pain Syndrome In Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis And The Effects Of Local Anesthetic Injections For Short-Term Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who have comorbid musculoskeletal disorders have a lower quality of life. However, there is limited data on the relationship between myofascial pain syndromes (MFPS) and MS. The aim of the study to investigate the frequency and impact of MFPS in patients with MS, to evaluate the effect of local anesthetic injections for short-term treatment. METHOD: Three hundred ninety-eight patients with MS patients were evaluated during the study period. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria investigated for MFPS. Patients with active myofascial trigger points received local anesthetics blocks monthly and attended at least 4 follow-up appointments. Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Instrument 54 (MSQO-54), Beck Depression Scale, The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Fatigue Impact Scale were administered before and after injections. The primary outcome was a 50 % reduction in pain intensity. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) met the inclusion criteria. MFPS was present in 70 of 137 (51.9 %) patients. Thirty-one patients participated; however, 25 patients completed the study. From 3-months post injections, a significant decrease in NPRS was found (p<0.001); in addition, the scores of MSQO-54 have significantly increased and the scores of fatigue impact and severity tests were decreased (p<0.001). No serious complications were noted. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support that MFPS can be experienced in patients with RRMS. Local anesthetic injections for trigger points may be an effective, tolerable, and inexpensive treatment for this patient group and contribute to significant reductions in pain severity scores and increase the quality of life.

Chronic Facial Pain: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, and Myofascial Pain Syndrome-An Evidence-Based Narrative Review and Etiological Hypothesis.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the most common form of severe facial pain, may be confused with an ill-defined persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). Facial pain is reviewed and a detailed discussion of TN and PIFP is presented. A possible cause for PIFP is proposed. (1) Methods: Databases were searched for articles related to facial pain, TN, and PIFP. Relevant articles were selected, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. (2) Discussion: The lifetime prevalence for TN is approximately 0.3% and for PIFP approximately 0.03%. TN is 15-20 times more common in persons with multiple sclerosis. Most cases of TN are caused by neurovascular compression, but a significant number are secondary to inflammation, tumor or trauma. The cause of PIFP remains unknown. Well-established TN treatment protocols include pharmacotherapy, neurotoxin denervation, peripheral nerve ablation, focused radiation, and microvascular decompression, with high rates of relief and varying degrees of adverse outcomes. No such protocols exist for PIFP. (3) Conclusion: PIFP may be confused with TN, but treatment possibilities differ greatly. Head and neck muscle myofascial pain syndrome is suggested as a possible cause of PIFP, a consideration that could open new approaches to treatment.

The Case for Comorbid Myofascial Pain-A Qualitative Review.

Myofascial pain syndrome is widely considered to be among the most prevalent pain conditions, both in the community and in specialized pain clinics. While myofascial pain often arises in otherwise healthy individuals, evidence is mounting that its prevalence may be even higher in individuals with various comorbidities. Comorbid myofascial pain has been observed in a wide variety of medical conditions, including malignant tumors, osteoarthritis, neurological conditions, and mental health conditions. Here, we review the evidence of comorbid myofascial pain and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of its recognition.

A Comprehensive Review of the Treatment and Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a musculoskeletal pain condition that stems from localized, taut regions of skeletal muscle and fascia, termed trigger points. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to provide updated information on prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities with a focus on interventional modalities in managing MPS. RECENT FINDINGS: Though MPS can present acutely, it frequently presents as a chronic condition, affecting up to 85% of adults during their lifetime. MPS is an often-overlooked component of pain with overarching effects on society, including patient quality of life, physical and social functioning, emotional well-being, energy, and costs on health care. The prevalence of MPS is generally increased among patients with other chronic pain disorders and has been associated with various other conditions such as bladder pain syndrome, endometriosis, and anxiety. MPS is poorly understood and remains a challenging condition to treat. Non-pharmacologic treatment modalities such as acupuncture, massage, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and interferential current therapy may offer relief to some patients with MPS. Additional studies are warranted to get a better understanding of managing myofascial pain.

Clinical presentation and characteristics of pelvic floor myofascial pain in patients presenting with constipation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain (PFMP) have puborectalis tenderness on digital rectal examination (DRE). Little is known about its significance to anorectal function in patients presenting with constipation. AIM: To characterize demographics, clinical characteristics, findings on anorectal manometry (ARM), diagnosis of rectal evacuation disorder (RED), colonic transit [normal (NTC) or slow (STC)], and imaging in constipated patients with PFMP and compare these features to constipation without PFMP. METHODS: We performed an electronic medical records review of patients with constipation evaluated by a single gastroenterologist between January 2008 and February 2019. Patients with PFMP were compared to controls with constipation but without PFMP (1:2 ratio). KEY RESULTS: A total of 98 PFMP cases and 196 controls were identified. Constipated patients with PFMP were more likely to have RED [OR 7.59 (3.82-15.09), P < .01]; controls were more likely to have either NTC [OR 4.25 (1.45-12.42), P < .01] or STC [OR 3.57 (1.45-8.78), P < .01]. RED in patients with PFMP is supported by comparison to controls: On DRE, they had increased resting tone [OR 2.25 (1.33-3.83), P < .01] and paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis upon simulated evacuation [OR 3.41 (1.94-6.00), P < .01]; on ARM, they had higher maximum resting pressure (102.9 mmHg vs 90.7 mmHg, P < .01) and lower rectoanal pressure gradient (-39.4 mmHg vs -24.7 mmHg, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS/INFERENCES: In constipated patients, PFMP is highly associated with RED. Its presence provides a valuable clue regarding the etiology of a patient's constipation; it should be assessed in all patients with constipation and should also be an additional target for management.

The prevalence of myofascial trigger points in hip and thigh areas in anterior knee pain patients.

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a widespread problem among young athletes and soldiers. There are many theories on the etiology of AKP but there is little reference to myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) as a possible contributor. AIM: To evaluate the association between AKP and prevalence of active and latent MTrPs in the hip and thigh muscles in soldiers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Beer-Sheva military outpatient physical therapy clinic. Subjects were 42 men and 23 women referred for physical therapy, 33 with a diagnosis of AKP (cases) and 32 with upper limb complaints (without AKP, controls). All subjects underwent physical evaluation by an examiner blinded to their identity and medical condition. The following muscles were assessed bilaterally for active or latent MTrPs: rectus femoris (proximal), vastus medialis (middle and distal), vastus lateralis (middle and distal) and gluteus medius (anterior, posterior and distal). RESULTS: In six out of eight areas, the cases had a higher prevalence of total active and latent MTrPs than the controls. When summarizing MTrPs by muscle, cases had significantly more MTrPs than controls in each muscle. The largest difference was found in vastus medialis and vastus lateralis; nearly half of the cases had MTrPs in these muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with AKP have a greater prevalence of MTrPs in their hip and thigh muscles than controls, indicating an association between MTrPs and AKP. Further research is necessary to determine whether MTrPs are the cause or the consequence of AKP.

Central Sensitization and Catastrophism Symptoms Are Associated with Chronic Myofascial Pain in the Gastrocnemius of Athletes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare central sensitization symptoms, presence of central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), catastrophism, rumination, magnification, and helplessness symptoms between athletes with gastrocnemius myofascial pain and healthy athletes. Furthermore, to predict central sensitization symptoms based on sociodemographic and descriptive data, catastrophism features, and presence of gastrocnemius myofascial pain in athletes. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: Fifty matched paired athletes were recruited and divided into patients with chronic (more than three months) gastrocnemius myofascial pain (N = 25) and healthy subjects (N = 25). METHODS: Central sensitization symptoms and CSS presence (≥40 points) were determined by the Central Sensitization Questionnaire (CSQ). Catastrophism symptoms and rumination, magnification, and helplessness domains were measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.01 for a 99% confidence interval. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) with a large effect size (d = 1.05-1.19) were shown for higher CSQ scores and PCS total and domain scores in athletes with gastrocnemius myofascial pain vs healthy athletes. Nevertheless, CSS presence (CSQ ≥ 40 points) did not show statistically significant differences (P = 0.050) between groups. A linear regression model (R2 = 0.560, P < 0.01) predicted higher CSQ scores based on PCS total score (R2 = 0.390), female sex (R2 = 0.095), and myofascial pain presence (R2 = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Greater symptoms of central sensitization, catastrophism, rumination, magnification, and helplessness were shown in athletes with gastrocnemius myofascial pain compared with healthy athletes. Nevertheless, there was not a statistically significant presence of CSS comparing both groups. Greater central sensitization symptoms were predicted by catastrophism symptoms, female sex, and presence of gastrocnemius myofascial pain in athletes.

Myofascial pain, widespread pressure hypersensitivity, and hyperalgesia in the face, neck, and shoulder regions, in survivors of head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Medical treatment for head and neck cancer may induce the presence of inflammation, pain, and dysfunction. The purpose of the current study was to assess the presence of myofascial trigger points (TrPs) and their relationship with widespread pressure hypersensitivity and hyperalgesia in survivors of head and neck cancer (sHNC). METHODS: TrPs and pressure-pain thresholds (PPTs) were quantified in different muscles/joints in the head and neck of 30 sHNC (59.45 ± 13.13 years) and 28 age- and sex-matched controls (58.11 ± 12.67 years). RESULTS: The sHNC had more TrPs in all muscles on the affected side (p < 0.05) than did the healthy controls, and in the temporalis, masseter, and suboccipitalis muscles on the unaffected side (p < 0.05). They also had lower PPTs in all places (p < 0.05) except for the temporalis muscle (p = 0.114) and C5-C6 joint (p = 0.977). The intensity of cervical pain correlated positively with the presence of upper trapezius TrPs. CONCLUSIONS: sHNC suffering cervical and/or temporomandibular joint pain have multiple active TrPs and experience widespread pressure hypersensitivity and hyperalgesia, suggestive of peripheral and central sensitization.

The prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea among students and its association with musculoskeletal and myofascial pain.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between dysmenorrhea and musculoskeletal pain amongst university students aged 20-35 and the association between dysmenorrhea and the occurrence of MTrPs. METHODS: The study comprised two stages: a cross-sectional study evaluated the association between dysmenorrhea and musculoskeletal pain and a case-control study evaluated the association between dysmenorrhea and the occurrence of MTrPs in the abdominal and pelvic area. Initially, questionnaires such as demographics, menstruation characteristics, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), measuring the average pain during menstruation and Nordic, were distributed to female students. Twenty subjects who suffered from menstrual pain of >3 on the NPRS (ones with the highest scores) were included in the second stage as cases. An additional 20 who had not suffered from menstrual pain (NPRS ≤3) were considered controls. All 40 subjects underwent an assessment of MTrPs by two examiners blinded to each other's results and to the group allocation of the subjects. RESULTS: We found that dysmenorrhea is a very prevalent condition among young female students. Most frequent complaints were: lower abdomen and back pain, tiredness, breast tenderness, mood changes, and an increased appetite. Pain during menstruation indicated a significant positive association with neck, low back, and hip/thigh pain during the last 12 months. The results of the palpitation conclusively showed more active MTrPs in the rectus abdominis, quadratus lumborum and paraspinal muscles in women suffering from pain during menstruation than in those who were not in pain. CONCLUSION: Our data provide an initial basis for the inclusion of a myofascial examination when evaluating women with dysmenorrhea.

Proximal myofascial pain in patients with distal complex regional pain syndrome of the upper limb.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) endure myofascial-related pain in at least 50% of cases. AIMS: To evaluate the association of upper limb CRPS with myofascial pain in muscles that might influence arm or hand pain, and to evaluate whether the paraspinal skin and subcutaneous layers' tenderness and allodynia are associated with CRPS. METHODS: A case-control study comprising 20 patients presenting with upper limb CRPS, and 20 healthy controls matched for sex and age, were evaluated in the thoracic paraspinal area and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) (infraspinatus, rhomboids, subclavius, serratus posterior superior and pectoralis minor) via a skin rolling test. RESULTS: The prevalence of MTrPs in the affected extremity of the subjects was significantly higher than in the right limb of the controls: 45% exhibited active and latent MTrPs in the infraspinatus muscle (χ2 = 11.613, p = 0.001); 60% in active and latent MTrPs in the subclavius muscle (χ2 = 17.143, p < 0.001); and in the pectoralis minor muscle (χ2 = 13.786, p < 0.001). In addition, 55% of the cases exhibited active and latent MTrPs in the serratus posterior superior muscle (χ2 = 15.172, p < 0.001). Significant differences between the groups in skin texture and pain levels (p = 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively) demonstrated that CRPS patients felt more pain, and their skin and subcutaneous layers were much tighter than in the healthy controls. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of MTrPs in the shoulder and upper thoracic area muscles in subjects who suffer from CRPS. We recommend adding an MTrPs evaluation to the standardized examination of these patients.

Pelvic floor myofascial pain severity and pelvic floor disorder symptom bother: is there a correlation?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor myofascial pain, which is predominantly identified in the muscles of the levator ani and obturator internus, has been observed in women with chronic pelvic pain and other pelvic floor disorder symptoms, and is hypothesized to contribute to their symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in patients presenting with pelvic floor disorder symptoms and to investigate whether severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination correlates with degree of pelvic floor disorder symptom bother. STUDY DESIGN: All new patients seen at 1 tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2016 were included in this retrospectively assembled cross-sectional study. Pelvic floor myofascial pain was determined by transvaginal palpation of the bilateral obturator internus and levator ani muscles and scored as a discrete number on an 11-point verbal pain rating scale (range, 0-10) at each site. Scores were categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) for each site. Pelvic floor disorder symptom bother was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form scores. The correlation between these 2 measures was calculated using Spearman rank and partial rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 912 new patients were evaluated. After exclusion of 79 with an acute urinary tract infection, 833 patients were included in the final analysis. Pelvic floor myofascial pain (pain rated >0 in any muscle group) was identified in 85.0% of patients: 50.4% rated as severe, 25.0% moderate, and 9.6% mild. In unadjusted analyses and those adjusted for postmenopausal status, severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain was significantly correlated with subjective prolapse symptoms such as pelvic pressure and heaviness but not with objective prolapse symptoms (seeing or feeling a vaginal bulge or having to push up on a bulge to start or complete urination) or leading edge. Severity of myofascial pain at several individual pelvic floor sites was also independently correlated with lower urinary tract symptoms, including pain in the lower abdomen (myofascial pain at all sites) and difficulty emptying the bladder (right obturator internus and left levator ani); and with defecatory dysfunction, including sensation of incomplete rectal emptying (pain at all sites combined and the right obturator internus), anal incontinence to flatus (pain at all sites combined), and pain with defecation (pain at all sites combined, and the right obturator internus and left levator ani). CONCLUSION: Pelvic floor myofascial pain was common in patients seeking evaluation for pelvic floor disorder symptoms. Location and severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain was significantly correlated with degree of symptom bother, even after controlling for postmenopausal status. Given the high prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in these patients and correlation between pain severity and degree of symptom bother, a routine assessment for pelvic floor myofascial pain should be considered for all patients presenting for evaluation of pelvic floor symptoms.

Myofascial component of cancer pain review.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common complaint of cancer patients, experienced by 38%-85% of patients. Some studies have shown a high incidence of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in cancer patients. AIMS: 1) To estimate the prevalence of MPS in cancer patients; 2) to examine the efficacy of current treatment options for MPS in cancer patients. METHODS: Narrative review. PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception until November 2017, for the keywords: cancer; cancer pain; breast cancer; mastectomy; lumpectomy; myofascial pain; trigger points. Trials of any methodological quality were included. All published material with an emphasis on randomized control trials was analyzed. RESULTS: MPS is prevalent in cancer patients who suffer from pain, with a prevalence of between 11.9% and 44.8% in those diagnosed either with neck or head or breast cancer. Clinical studies showed conflicting results. Four interventional studies found that specific treatment for MPS may reduce the prevalence of active myofascial trigger points and therefore decrease pain level, sensitivity, and improve range of motion (in shoulder) in cancer patients. Two recent randomized control trials showed that pressure release of trigger points provides no additional beneficial effects to a standard physical therapy program for upper limb pain and function after breast cancer surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend including the evaluation of myofascial pain in routine clinical examination of cancer patients suffering from pain. Future studies are needed to investigate the long- and short-term effect of MPS treatments in cancer patients.

Joint Hypermobility among Female Patients Presenting with Chronic Myofascial Pelvic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Female chronic pelvic pain is estimated to affect up to 24% of adult women, many of whom have a component of myofascial pelvic pain. Although an association of joint hypermobility and pelvic pain has been hypothesized, limited data are available that estimate the prevalence of joint hypermobility in this population. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD) among female patients with chronic myofascial pelvic pain and examine the association between G-HSD and other frequent pelvic pain-associated complaints. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control. SETTING: Tertiary referral center within a university-affiliated public health system. PATIENTS: Adult women who were diagnosed with myofascial pelvic pain during a 1-year period (n = 77 with G-HSD and n = 241 without G-HSD). METHODS: Data were abstracted via chart review of patients meeting inclusion criteria. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of G-HSD among patients with persistent myofascial pelvic pain. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of dyspareunia, provoked vestibulodynia, stress urinary incontinence, irritable bowel syndrome, hip pain, low back pain, and fibromyalgia in patients with persistent myofascial pelvic pain with and without G-HSD. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent (N = 77; 95% CI: 19.6, 29.4) of myofascial pelvic pain patients also met criteria for G-HSD. After adjusting for confounders, the odds in favor of having G-HSD was 3.55 higher (95% CI: 1.50, 8.40) (P = .004) in females with dyspareunia; 7.46 higher (95% CI: 2.41, 23.1) (P < .001) with low back pain; 3.76 higher (95% CI: 1.35, 10.5) (P = .02) with stress urinary incontinence; 4.72 higher (95% CI: 2.00, 11.2) (P < .001) with irritable bowel syndrome; and 3.12 higher (95% CI: 1.36, 7.13) (P = .007) with hip pain. There was no significant association identified between provoked vestibulodynia or fibromyalgia and G-HSD. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of G-HSD is higher in chronic myofascial pelvic pain patients than in the general population with statistically significant associations with several comorbid conditions. Characterizing these associations is the first step in developing effective, evidence-based screening recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.