Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Immunol ; 81(6): 293-299, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279925

RESUMO

MAIN PROBLEM: Luminex panel and single antigen beads (SAB) are used for screening and DSA specificity determination respectively. The cost of SAB may limit its general use, so some labs perform SAB tests only after positive screening. METHODS: We compared both strategies: 1) SAB only if positive screening with kits from manufacturer A, and 2) direct SAB from manufacturer B, and correlate their sensitivity with histological findings. RESULTS: We selected 118 kidney transplant recipients with a normal biopsy (n = 19), histological antibody-mediated damage (ABMR, n = 52) or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA, n = 47) following Banff 2015 and 2017 classification. Direct SAB detected DSA in 13 patients missed by screening. Strategy 1 detected DSA in 0% normal, 61.5% ABMR and 8.5% IFTA patients; percentages with strategy 2 were 5.2%, 78.8% and 14.8% (p=0.004). Strategy 2 identified DSA allowing full ABMR diagnosis in 17% cases missed by strategy 1. Thereafter, direct SAB from manufacturer A confirmed DSA in 46% DSA-positive cases with strategy 2 (55.5% ABMR cases). CONCLUSIONS: Luminex screening failed to identify clinically relevant HLA antibodies, hampering DSA detection in patients with possible ABMR. Direct SAB testing should be the chosen strategy for post-transplantation monitoring, albeit direct SAB from the two existing manufacturers may diverge in as much as 50% of cases.


Assuntos
Isoanticorpos/sangue , Transplante de Rim , Rim/patologia , Sorologia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fibrose , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Separação Imunomagnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sorologia/economia
2.
Pathology ; 51(3): 313-315, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808509

RESUMO

Over-utilisation of pathology requests can incur unnecessary costs and be detrimental to patient care. The choosing wisely campaign has helped to reduce the use of tests with limited or no value. This report describes the estimated benefits and costs of implementing a triage process of infectious serology requests in a single mixed hospital and community laboratory. Data analysis of triaging of send away infectious serology was conducted from 1 November 2016 to 31 October 2017. A total of 618 tests were triaged over a 1-year period. Of these 379 (61.3%) were declined. The total gross savings was $45,066. The total cost for implementing this change was estimated to be $4220 per year. The total saving was $40,846.37. There was significant cost saving secondary to this intervention, with other more difficult to measure tangible benefits including fostering communication between laboratory staff and clinicians.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Sorologia/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA