The Utility of the Modified Dionne's Egress Test as a Predictor of Falls in Adult Medical and Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a modified Dionne's Egress Test (Egress) as a predictor of falls with the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) in adult medical and surgical patients in an acute care setting. BACKGROUND: Nurses must identify fall risk while balancing fall prevention and early mobility in their care delivery. Fall risk screening tools alone are not enough to assist nurses in predicting patients at risk of falling. METHODS: A retrospective observational study design was used to compare the Egress as a predictor of falls to the MFS. The sample included data abstracted from 197 electronic health records and internal falls data. RESULTS: The Egress and the MFS are moderately and negatively correlated; however, only Egress was a significant predictor of falls. Passing the Egress, not being on benzodiazepines, and having a longer length of stay (LOS) results were associated with being less likely to fall. CONCLUSION: Egress is a better predictor of falls than MFS when benzodiazepines and LOS are controlled in the model.

Discharge Summary Completion Timeliness and the Association of 30-Day Readmission.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the association between timeliness to completion of a discharge summary to 30-day readmission to the hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 109 patients discharged from Mayo Clinic Hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-four of these patients were readmitted within 30 days. The time to completion of discharge summary was categorized for these readmissions to <72 hours: 15 (20%), between 72 hours and 7 days: 2 (11.1%), and >7 days: 7 (43.7%). There was no statistical significance for readmission for discharge summaries completed between 72 hours and 7 days compared with <72 hours (P = 0.44). There was statistical significance correlating readmission within 30 days to the discharge summary completed >7 days compared with <72 hours (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that discharge summaries completed >7 days have an increased association with 30-day readmission rate.

Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cancer, and Their Metabolic Sequelae: Projected Burden to 2050.

INTRODUCTION: Future burden has been modeled from population-based data for several common gastrointestinal diseases. However, as we enter the third decade in the 21st century, there are no such data on diseases of the pancreas holistically. The study aimed to estimate future incidence of pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (DEP), and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction (EPD) as well as years of life lost (YLL) due to premature death in individuals with those diseases up to 2050. METHODS: Historical New Zealand nationwide data on hospital discharge, pharmaceutical dispensing, cancer, and mortality were obtained. Annual incidence of each disease and annual YLLs due to premature death in individuals with each disease were calculated. A time series analysis using the stepwise autoregressive method was conducted. RESULTS: Pancreatitis yielded the highest projected incidence (123.7 per 100,000; 95% confidence interval, 116.7-130.7) and YLL (14,709 years; 13,642-15,777) in 2050. The projected incidence and YLL of pancreatic cancer were 18.6 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval, 13.1-24.1) and 14,247 years (11,349-17,144) in 2050, respectively. Compared with pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, DEP and EPD yielded lower but more steeply increasing projected incidence rates and YLLs. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that the burden of pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, DEP, and EPD will rise in the next 3 decades unless healthcare systems introduce effective prevention or early treatment strategies for diseases of the pancreas and their sequelae.

Tracking Substance Use Complications: A Collaborative Analysis of Public Health and Academic Medical Center Records on Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems and public health agencies use different methods to measure the impact of substance use (SU) on population health. We studied the ability of systems to accurately capture data on drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DUA-IE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with IE discharge diagnosis from an academic medical center, 2011-2017, comparing data from hospital Electronic Health Record (EHR) to State Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS). To identify SU we developed a composite measure. RESULTS: EHR identified 472 IE discharges (430 of these were captured in UHDDS); 406 (86.0%) were correctly coded based on chart review. IE discharges increased from 57 to 92 (62%) from 2012 to 2017. Hospitalizations for the subset of DUA-IE identified by any measure of SU increased from 10 to 54 (440%). Discharge diagnosis coding identified 128 (60.7%) of total DUA-IE hospitalizations. The composite measure identified an additional 65 (30.8%) DUA-IE hospitalizations and chart review an additional 18 (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The failure of discharge diagnosis coding to identify DUA-IE in 40% of hospitalizations demonstrates the need for better systems to capture the impact of SU. Collaborative data sharing could help improve surveillance responsiveness to address an emerging public health crises.

Differences among Research Domain Criteria score trajectories by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual categorical diagnosis during inpatient hospitalization.

With brief psychiatric hospitalizations, the extent to which symptoms change is rarely characterized. We sought to understand symptomatic changes across Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) dimensions, and the extent to which such improvement might be associated with risk for readmission. We identified 3,634 individuals with 4,713 hospital admissions to the psychiatric inpatient unit of a large academic medical center between 2010 and 2015. We applied a natural language processing tool to extract estimates of the five RDoC domains to the admission note and discharge summary and calculated the change in each domain. We examined the extent to which symptom domains changed during admission, and their relationship to baseline clinical and sociodemographic features, using linear regression. Symptomatic worsening was rare in the negative valence (0.4%) and positive valence (5.1%) domains, but more common in cognition (25.8%). Most diagnoses exhibited improvement in negative valence, which was associated with significant reduction in readmission risk. Despite generally brief hospital stays, we detected reduction across multiple symptom domains, with greatest improvement in negative symptoms, and greatest probability of worsening in cognitive symptoms. This approach should facilitate investigations of other features or interventions which may influence pace of clinical improvement.

Clinical features and outcomes of discharged coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic but the follow-up data of discharged patients was barely described. AIM: To investigate clinical outcomes, distribution of quarantine locations and the infection status of the contacts of COVID-19 patients after discharge. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. METHODS: Demographics, baseline characteristics of 131 COVID-19 patients discharged from 3 February 2020 to 21 February 2020 in Wuhan, China were collected and analyzed by reviewing the medical records retrospectively. Post-hospitalization data related to clinical outcomes, quarantine locations and close contact history were obtained by following up the patients every week up to 4 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-three (40.05%) patients on discharge had cough (29.01%), fatigue (7.63%), expectoration (6.11%), chest tightness (6.11%), dyspnea (3.82%), chest pain (3.05%) and palpitation (1.53%). These symptoms constantly declined in 4 weeks post-discharge. Transient fever recurred in 11 (8.4%) patients. Among the discharged patients, 78 (59.5%) underwent chest CT and 2 (1.53%) showed deterioration. A total of 94 (71.8%) patients received SARS-CoV-2 retest and 8 (6.10%) reported positive. Seven (2.29%) patients were readmitted because of fever or positive SARS-CoV-2 retest. After discharge, 121 (92.37%) and 4 (3.05%) patients were self-quarantined at home or community spots, respectively, after a close contact with 167 persons in total who were free of COVID-19 at the endpoint of study. CONCLUSION: The majority of COVID-19 patients after discharge were in the course of recovery. Readmission was required in rare cases due to suspected recurrence of COVID-19. Although no contacted infection observed, appropriate self-quarantine and regular re-examination are necessary, particularly for those who have recurred symptoms.

Estimating the obstetric co-morbidity burden using administrative data: The impact of the pregnancy-related assessment window.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased research using large administrative databases to identify determinants of maternal morbidity and mortality, the extent to which these databases capture obstetric co-morbidities is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact that the time window used to assess obstetric co-morbidities has on the completeness of ascertainment of those co-morbidities. METHODS: We conducted a five-year analysis of inpatient hospitalisations of pregnant women from 2010-2014 using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. For each woman, using discharge diagnoses, we identified 24 conditions used to create the Obstetric Comorbidity Index. Using various assessment windows for capturing obstetric co-morbidities, including the delivery hospitalisation only and all weekly windows from 7 to 280 days, we calculated the frequency and rate of each co-morbidity and the degree of underascertainment of the co-morbidity. Under each scenario, and for each co-morbidity, we also calculated the all-cause, 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: There were over 3 million delivery hospitalisations from 2010 to 2014 included in this analysis. Compared with a full 280-day window, assessment of obstetric co-morbidities using only diagnoses made during the delivery hospitalisation would result in failing to identify over 35% of cases of chronic renal disease, 28.5% cases in which alcohol abuse was documented during pregnancy, and 23.1% of women with pulmonary hypertension. For seven other co-morbidities, at least 1 in 20 women with that condition would have been missed with exclusive reliance on the delivery hospitalisation for co-morbidity diagnoses. Not only would reliance on delivery hospitalisations have resulted in missed cases of co-morbidities, but for many conditions, estimates of readmission rates for women with obstetric co-morbidities would have been underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing proportion of maternal and child health research is based on large administrative databases. This study provides data that facilitate the assessment of the degree to which important obstetric co-morbidities may be underascertained when using these databases.

Associations of Hospital Discharge Services With Potentially Avoidable Readmissions Within 30 Days Among Older Adults After Rehabilitation in Acute Care Hospitals in Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of 3 major hospital discharge services covered under health insurance (discharge planning, rehabilitation discharge instruction, and coordination with community care) with potentially avoidable readmissions (PARs) within 30 days in older adults after rehabilitation in acute care hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using a large-scale medical claims database of all Tokyo residents aged ≥75 years. SETTING: Acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent rehabilitation and were discharged to home (N=31,247; mean age in years ± SD, 84.1±5.7) between October 2013 and July 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day PAR. RESULTS: Among the patients, 883 (2.9%) experienced 30-day PAR. A multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model (with a logit link function and binominal sampling distribution) that adjusted for patient characteristics and clustering within hospitals showed that the discharge services were not significantly associated with 30-day PAR. The odds ratios were 0.962 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805-1.151) for discharge planning, 1.060 (95% CI, 0.916-1.227) for rehabilitation discharge instruction, and 1.118 (95% CI, 0.817-1.529) for coordination with community care. In contrast, the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with home medical care services were 1.431 times higher than those of patients without these services (P<.001), and the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with a higher number (median or higher) of rehabilitation units were 2.031 times higher than those of patients with a lower number (below median) (P<.001). Also, the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with a higher Hospital Frailty Risk Score (median or higher) were 1.252 times higher than those of patients with a lower score (below median) (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The insurance-covered discharge services were not associated with 30-day PAR, and the development of comprehensive transitional care programs through the integration of existing discharge services may help to reduce such readmissions.

Postpartum hypertensive disorders in the Emergency Department - A retrospective review of local practice in Calgary, Alberta.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) commonly occur postpartum and are associated with preventable maternal morbidity and mortality. HDP is the most common reason for presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) after delivery. However, given the broad range of non-specific symptoms, recognition and management of postpartum HDP may be delayed leading to serious adverse clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To describe: (1) the clinical presentation; (2) ED physician's diagnosis; and (3) current ED management of women with HDP in Calgary ED's. METHODS: A retrospective review of postpartum women (within 42 days of delivery) attending three Calgary EDs between 2011 and 2012 was performed. Administrative data was used to randomly select 119 women; 44 with diagnostic codes for any HDP (labeled "HDP") and 75 with diagnostic codes for related diagnoses (e.g., abdominal pain, headache) (labeled "non-HDP"). Charts were reviewed for: maternal demographics; obstetrical history; and ED clinical findings, investigations and management. RESULTS: Maternal characteristics were similar between groups. There was considerable overlap in clinical presentation between groups, with no significant difference for any presenting symptom. Only 52.3% (CI 40.0-64.3%) of women in the "HDP" group had HDP investigations (bloodwork and urinalysis) vs. 30.4% (CI 18.7-58.5%) of "non-HDP" (p = 0.072). HDP was diagnosed by the ED team in 42.9% (CI 31.1-55.5%) of the HDP group of whom only 40.3% (CI 28.7-53.1) received antihypertensive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum HDP is commonly under-recognized and under-treated in the ED, highlighting opportunities for interventions to improve the recognition and management of postpartum HDP.

Post-Acute Care Locations: Hospital Discharge Destination Reports vs Medicare Claims.

OBJECTIVES: Administrative records such as Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims provide accurate information on services paid for by Medicare. However, the increasing availability of electronic health records means many researchers may be inclined to rely on data coded in hospital information systems rather than claims. The current quality and accuracy of hospital reports on the use of post-acute care (PAC) services are not known. DESIGN: This study examined differences in the PAC use between hospital discharge status recorded on Medicare Provider and Analysis Review inpatient hospital records and claims for PAC services. SETTING: In addition to assessments of the three types of Medicare-reimbursed PAC (home health agency [HHA], skilled nursing facility [SNF], and inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF]), the analysis also considered home without PAC services as a default discharge location. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis was conducted using data for FFS beneficiaries who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and had one or more inpatient hospitalizations from 2006 to 2011. MEASUREMENTS: This study measured discrepancies between hospital-reported discharges to PAC and PAC use based on Medicare claims. RESULTS: The study found that, on average, 27.9% of hospital reports of discharging to Medicare-covered PAC services were not substantiated by Medicare PAC claims. Among all the discharge pathways, discharging to HHAs had the highest discrepancy rate (29.6%), followed by IRFs (14.7%) and SNFs (13.8%). CONCLUSION: The study results call for cautions about the extent to which the reported discharge locations on hospital claims may differ from actual PAC services used. Assuming that Medicare FFS claims were complete and accurate, researchers using the discharge status reported on Medicare hospital claims should be aware of possible measurement errors when using hospital-reported discharge locations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:847-851, 2020.

Patient's perception of kidney stone prevention within the emergency department and its adherence factors: a single institution study.

BACKGROUND: No known data in the literature assessing practice of kidney stone prevention in the emergency department (ED) is available. OBJECTIVES: Assess patient perception and compliance to kidney stone prevention given within the emergency department. It also indirectly detects the attitude and practice patterns of primary care providers in kidney stone prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study done in a single institution from January 2018 to January 2019 that includes 99 patients that were diagnosed with kidney or ureteral stone in ED and were discharged home, all of them where stone formers. They were asked to fill a self- administered questionnaire when they are able to read, or interviewed by the resident within the ED when they are unable to read. RESULTS: The majority of patients (68%) did not receive any instructions about kidney stones prevention within the ED. Most of patients who follow instructions if it was given were educated (90%), had an insurance coverage (85%), and had an income higher than $1000 per month (76%), (p < 0.05). Seventy one percents of patients believe in the effectiveness of stone prevention if it was provided and most of them are interested in learning about these preventive strategies (82%). Reasons for not following the instructions about kidney stones prevention measures were the cost (53.1%) following by the lack of explanation by ED physicians (18.8%). The majority of patients (62.6%) prefer to receive kidney stones prevention measures from urologists. CONCLUSION: Most of patients in our institute did not receive kidney stones prevention measures in ED despite that they declared their interest in following these measures. Most of the time they did not adhere to those measures due to socioeconomic factors and lack of clarifications. If these instructions were given within the ED, it could lead to an acceptable compliance rate.

La violencia interpersonal en España a través del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos / Interpersonal violence in Spain through national hospital discharge survey

Objetivo: Describir la epidemiología de la violencia interpersonal en España. Método: Estudio descriptivo de los casos de pacientes con diagnóstico secundario de agresión registrados en el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de altas hospitalarias, entre 1999 y 2011, utilizando los códigos E960 a E969 de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-9). Se describe la distribución por sexo, edad y tipo de alta y de atención requerida, morbilidad asociada, mortalidad y comunidad autónoma. Se estudia la calidad del registro en función de su variación temporal. Resultados: El perfil de agresión en hombres (85%) es el de un paciente de entre 15 y 44 años, que en un 93,7% de los casos precisa atención urgente y cuya gravedad es moderada (95% alta a domicilio). El 2,5% de los pacientes reingresa, y se produce la muerte en el 1,1% de las ocasiones. El perfil en las mujeres (15%) difiere ligeramente: edad comprendida entre 31 y 52 años, el 94% requiere atención urgente (si bien el 96% tiene una gravedad moderada), el 3% reingresa y en el 1,7% de las ocasiones la paciente muere. Conclusiones: Aunque necesitan ser mejorados para evitar ciertas limitaciones, los sistemas de información sanitaria constituyen una riquísima fuente de datos que pueden ser utilizados para la investigación en salud y, a través de sus resultados, para el desarrollo de planes de prevención e intervención sociosanitaria en temas de violencia

Objective: To describe the epidemiology of interpersonal violence in Spain. Method: Descriptive study of the cases of patients with secondary diagnosis of aggression registered on a national hospital discharge database, between 1999 and 2011, using the codes from E960 to E969 of the ICD-9. The distribution by sex, age and type of discharge, associated morbidity, mortality and by autonomous community is described. The quality of the record is studied according to its temporal variation. Results: The case profile of aggression in men (85%) is of a patient between 15 and 44 years old, who in 93.7% of cases requires urgent care and whose severity is moderate (95% discharge home). Two point five percent of patients are readmitted and death occurs in1.1%. The profile in women (15%) differs slightly, with an age between 31 and 52 years, 94% require urgent attention, although 96% have moderate severity; 3% are readmitted and 1.7% die. Conclusions: Although they need to be improved to avoid certain limitations, health information systems are a rich source of data that can be used for research in health and, through their results, for the development of prevention plans and intervention in matters of violence

Lyme neuroborreliosis epidemiology in Sweden 2010 to 2014: clinical microbiology laboratories are a better data source than the hospital discharge diagnosis register.

BackgroundIn a study from 2013 that prioritised communicable diseases for surveillance in Sweden, we identified Lyme borreliosis as one of the diseases with highest priority. In 2014, when the present study was designed, there were also plans to make neuroborreliosis notifiable within the European Union.AimWe compared possibilities of surveillance of neuroborreliosis in Sweden through two different sources: the hospital discharge register and reporting from the clinical microbiology laboratories.MethodsWe examined the validity of ICD-10 codes in the hospital discharge register by extracting personal identification numbers for all cases of neuroborreliosis, defined by a positive cerebrospinal fluid-serum anti-Borrelia antibody index, who were diagnosed at the largest clinical microbiology laboratory in Sweden during 2014. We conducted a retrospective observational study with a questionnaire sent to all clinical microbiology laboratories in Sweden requesting information on yearly number of cases, age group and sex for the period 2010 to 2014.ResultsAmong 150 neuroborreliosis cases, 67 (45%) had received the ICD-10 code A69.2 (Lyme borreliosis) in combination with G01.9 (meningitis in bacterial diseases classified elsewhere), the combination that the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare recommends for neuroborreliosis. All 22 clinical laboratories replied to our questionnaire. Based on laboratory reporting, the annual incidence of neuroborreliosis in Sweden was 6.3 cases per 100,000 in 2014.ConclusionThe hospital discharge register was unsuitable for surveillance of neuroborreliosis, whereas laboratory-based reporting was a feasible alternative. In 2018, the European Commission included Lyme neuroborreliosis on the list of diseases under epidemiological surveillance.

Evaluation of discharge prescriptions for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Iraq

Background: Optimal prescribing of secondary prevention medications after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, it is unknown whether these medications are optimally prescribed at discharge from acute care in Iraq. Objective: To evaluate whether patients with ACS received optimal secondary prevention medications: antiplatelets, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs), and beta-blockers at discharge from a cardiology unit, and to assess whether statins, ACEI/ARBs and beta-blockers were prescribed at target doses based on the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines. Methods: Observational retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with ACS admitted to a hospital in Baghdad and survived to discharge between May 2016 and January 2017. Patient-level data and secondary prevention medications at discharge were extracted from routine medical records. Optimal dosing was defined as ≥75%, moderate dosing as 50-74%, and low dosing as <50% of the target dose. Results: 45.6% (200/439) of eligible patients were included in the study who were aged 25 to 90 years (mean 57.8 years) with 78.0% (156/200) being male. Of those included, 84.5% had a myocardial infarction and 15.5% unstable angina, and the length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 29 days (median 4 days). In total, 53.5% of patients were prescribed all five secondary prevention medications at discharge, and after accounting for contraindications, 60.0% were treated according to AHA/ACC guidelines. The prescription rate of dual antiplatelet therapy, statins, ACEI/ARBs and beta-blockers was 92.5%, 94.5%, 69.5% and 87.0% respectively. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and the prescription of oral nitrates were associated with the prescription of optimal secondary prevention therapy. Although 80.9% of patients were prescribed target doses of antiplatelets and statins, only 12.2% and 9.2% were prescribed target doses of ACEI/ARBs, and beta-blockers respectively. Conclusions: Approximately one in two patients received the recommended secondary prevention therapy. However, only a minority of patients were prescribed optimal doses of ACEI/ARBs and beta-blockers, in line with guidance. Quality improvement strategies should be implemented, which may include greater involvement of pharmacists within the cardiology multidisciplinary team

No disponible

Rendimiento de los indicadores tras la implementación del Documento de consenso español para el control de la hiperglucemia en el hospital y al alta / Indicator performance after the implementation of the Spanish Consensus Document for the control of hyperglycemia in the hospital and at discharge

Antecedentes y objetivos: la información sobre el manejo de los pacientes diabéticos en el momento del alta hospitalaria es reducida. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la implementación de las recomendaciones del Consenso español para el manejo del alta hospitalaria en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) o hiperglucemia durante la hospitalización. Métodos: estudio observacional con un grupo de recogida prospectiva y otra retrospectiva de pacientes con DM2/hiperglucemia (> 140mg/dl) durante la hospitalización de 19 hospitales españoles. Se recopilaron indicadores de calidad en el informe de alta, terapia hipoglucémica, HbA1c y eventos adversos al ingreso, en el momento del alta y a los 3 meses del alta. Resultados: se incluyó a 199 pacientes en el grupo prospectivo y 75 en el retrospectivo. Los indicadores de calidad del informe de alta hospitalaria fueron mayores en el grupo prospectivo (p<0,001). La proporción de pacientes con tratamiento de insulina, fármacos antidiabéticos orales (ADO) e insulina+ADO sufrió modificaciones en el momento del alta hospitalaria de los pacientes del grupo prospectivo con HbA1c<7,5% (p<0,005) y ≥ 7,5% (p<0,001), y en los pacientes del grupo retrospectivo con HbA1c ≥ 7,5% (p<0,001). En el mes 3 tras el alta, los niveles de HbA1c descendieron de 8,2± 1,9% a 7,3±1,2% (p<0,001) en el grupo prospectivo y desde 8,2±1,9% a 7,3±1,2% (p<0,001) en el retrospectivo. Los episodios de hipoglucemia e hiperglucemia así como los de reingreso fueron semejantes en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: la aplicación del documento español de consenso de las recomendaciones para el manejo del alta hospitalaria en pacientes con DM2 o hiperglucemia mejora de forma considerable el registro de indicadores de calidad en el informe de alta. La conciliación de la medicación antidiabética en el momento del alta hospitalaria mejora el control glucémico después del alta

Background and aims: information for the adequate management of diabetic patients at hospital discharge is limited. We aimed to evaluate the impact of implementation of recommendations of the Spanish consensus for the management hospital discharge in patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycaemia during hospitalization. Methods: observational multicentric study with a prospective and a retrospective colection of patients with type 2 diabetes /hyperglycaemia (>140mg/dl) during hospitalization from 19 Spanish hospitals. Quality indicators in discharge report, antidiabetic therapy, HbA1c and adverse events were gathered at hospital admission, hospital discharge and 3 month post-discharge. Results: 199 and 75 subjects in the prospective and retrospective group respectively were included. The indicators of quality in the hospital discharge reports was higher in the prospective group (P<.001). The proportion of patients with insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), and insulin+OADs was modified at discharge in patients with HbA1c<7.5% (P<.005) and ≥7.5% (P<.001) in the prospective group and in patients with HbA 1c ≥7.5% (P<.001) in the retrospective group. At 3 month post-discharge HbA1c levels decreased from 8.2±1.9% to 7.3±1.2% (P<.001) in the prospective group, and from 8.3±1.5% to 7.2±1.2% (P<.001) in the retrospective group. Hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic episodes and hospital readmissions were similar in both groups. Conclusions: implementation of Spanish consensus recommendations for the management of hospital discharge in patients with diabetes type 2 or hyperglycaemia considerably improved the registration of quality indicators in the discharge report. Reconciliation of antidiabetic medication at the time of hospital discharge, improves glycaemic control after hospital discharge

Impact of atrial fibrillation on inpatient cost for ischemic stroke in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke and increases cost of treatment. AIMS: To estimate the incremental inpatient cost and length of stay due to atrial fibrillation among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics in a nationally representative discharge record of US population. METHODS: Hospital discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke were identified from the National Inpatient Sample data for the years 2010-2013. Generalized linear model with log link and least-square means were utilized to estimate the incremental inpatient cost and length of stay in ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 434,544 hospital discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke, 90,190 (20.76%) discharge records had a secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. The average inpatient cost for all discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke was (mean = $13,072, median = $9270.87) significantly (p < 0.0001) higher compared to all discharge records without ischemic stroke (mean = $12,543.07, median = $7517.13). The mean length of stay for all records was 4.55 days (95% CI = 4.53-4.56). Among those identified with ischemic stroke, adjusted mean inpatient cost was higher by $2829 (95% CI = $2708-$2949) and mean length of stay was greater by 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81-0.89) for those with atrial fibrillation compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of atrial fibrillation was associated with increased inpatient cost and length of stay among patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke. Increased inpatient cost and length of stay call for a more comprehensive patient care approach including targeted interventions among adults diagnosed with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, which could potentially reduce the overall cost in this population.

Diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes of heart failure in an administrative database.

PURPOSE: Heart failure (HF) is a common, serious, and still poorly known illness, which might benefit from studies in claims databases. However, to provide reliable estimates, HF patients must be adequately identified. This validation study aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes I50.x, heart failure, in the French hospital discharge diagnoses database. METHODS: This study was performed in two university hospitals, comparing recorded discharge diagnoses and electronic health records (EHRs). Patients with discharge ICD-10 codes 150.x were randomly selected. Their EHRs were reviewed to classify HF diagnosis as definite, potential, or miscoded based on the European Society of Cardiology diagnostic criteria, from which the codes' positive predictive value (PPV) was computed. To estimate sensitivity, patients with an EHR HF diagnosis were identified, and the presence of the I50.x codes was sought for in the hospital discharge database. RESULTS: Two hundred possible cases of HF were selected from the hospital discharge database, and 229 patients with an HF diagnosis were identified from the EHR. The PPV of I50.x codes was 60.5% (95% CI, 53.7%-67.3%) for definite HF and 88.0% (95% CI, 83.5%-92.5%) for definite/potential HF. The sensitivity of I50.x codes was 64.2% (95% CI, 58.0%-70.4%). PPV results were similar in both hospitals; sensitivity depended on the source of EHR: Departments of cardiology had a higher sensitivity than had nonspecialized wards. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis codes I50.x in discharge summary databases accurately identify patients with HF but fail to capture some of them.

Low proportion of unreported cervical treatments in the cancer registry of Norway between 1998 and 2013.

BACKGROUND: Accurate information about treatment is needed to evaluate cervical cancer prevention efforts. We studied completeness and validity of reporting cervical treatments in the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 47,423 (92%) high-grade cervical dysplasia patients with and 3983 (8%) without recorded treatment in the CRN in 1998-2013. We linked the latter group to the nationwide registry of hospital discharges in 1998-2015. Of patients still without treatment records, we randomly selected 375 for review of their medical history. Factors predicting incomplete treatment records were assessed by multiple imputation and logistic regression. RESULTS: Registry linkage revealed that 10% (401/3983) of patients received treatment, usually conization, within one year of their initial high-grade dysplasia diagnosis. Of those, 11% (n = 44) were missing due to unreporting and 89% (n = 357) due to misclassification at the CRN. Of all cases in medical review, patients under active surveillance contributed almost 60% (223/375). Other reasons of being without recorded treatment were uncertain dysplasia diagnosis, invasive cancer or death. Coding error occurred in 19% (73/375) of randomly selected cases. CRN undercounted receipt of treatment by 38% (n = 1526) among patients without recorded treatment which translates into 97% overall completeness of treatment data. Incomplete treatment records were particularly associated with public laboratories, patients aged 40-54 years, and the latest study years. CONCLUSIONS: CRN holds accurate information on cervical treatments. Completeness and particularly validity can be further improved through the establishment of new internal routines and regular linkage to hospital discharges.

Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: a multicentre prospective study in the UK.

AIMS: Polypharmacy is increasingly common in older adults, placing them at risk of medication-related harm (MRH). Patients are particularly vulnerable to problems with their medications in the period following hospital discharge due to medication changes and poor information transfer between hospital and primary care. The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence, severity, preventability and cost of MRH in older adults in England postdischarge. METHODS: An observational, multicentre, prospective cohort study recruited 1280 older adults (median age 82 years) from five teaching hospitals in Southern England, UK. Participants were followed up for 8 weeks by senior pharmacists, using three data sources (hospital readmission review, participant telephone interview and primary care records), to identify MRH and associated health service utilization. RESULTS: Overall, 413 participants (37%) experienced MRH (556 MRH events per 1000 discharges), of which 336 (81%) cases were serious and 214 (52%) potentially preventable. Four participants experienced fatal MRH. The most common MRH events were gastrointestinal (n = 158, 25%) or neurological (n = 111, 18%). The medicine classes associated with the highest risk of MRH were opiates, antibiotics and benzodiazepines. A total of 328 (79%) participants with MRH sought healthcare over the 8-week follow-up. The incidence of MRH-associated hospital readmission was 78 per 1000 discharges. Postdischarge MRH in older adults is estimated to cost the National Health Service £396 million annually, of which £243 million is potentially preventable. CONCLUSIONS: MRH is common in older adults following hospital discharge, and results in substantial use of healthcare resources.

The Iranian Neonatal Registry: Primary Results.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal registry network systems are conducted worldwide in order to improve the quality of neonatal care and also to integrate research into daily practice. METHODS: We designed a neonatal registry system and conducted a pilot study in Vali-Asr Hospital to explore its effectiveness to develop an overview of our neonatal status. This study is a report of three years of data registry (2013-2016) in above mentioned system. RESULTS: Data were collected from 3360 neonates admitted to level 2 of neonatal ward, and NICU (level 3) of the Vali-Asr Hospital. Among them, 184 (5.5%) neonates didn't survive. The mean ± SD of gestational age (GA) was 35.92 ± 3.352 weeks and the mean ± SD of the birth weight was 2609.23 ± 829.751 g. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicated that the neonatal registry system can help us to have a better overview of the performance of neonatal wards, and also to find new aspects of neonatal disorders. In addition, this study showed that neonatal registry is an essential tool to improve neonatal care.