[Mutation spectrum analysis of 23-site chip neonatal deafness genetic screening].

Objective:To analyze the mutation spectrum of 23-site chip newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing, and to provide basis for genetic counseling and clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods:The study included 21 006 babies born in Beijing from December 2022 to June 2023. All subjects underwent newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing Tongren Hospital, covering 23 variants in 4 genes, the GJB2 gene（c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, c.109G>A, c.257C>G, c.512insAACG, c.427C>T, c.35insG）, SLC26A4 gene（c.919-2A>G, c.2168A>G, c.1174A>T, c.1226G>A, c.1229C>T, c.1975G>C, c.2027T>A, c.589G>A, c.1707+5G>A, c.917insG, c.281C>T）, Mt12SrRNA（m.1555A>G, m.1494C>T） and GJB3 gene（c.538C>T）. The mutation detection rate and allele frequency were analyzed. Results:The overall mutation detection rate was 11.516%（2 419/21 006）, with the GJB2 gene being the most frequently involved at 9.097%（1 911/21 006）, followed by the SLC26A4 gene at 2.123%（446/21 006）, the GJB3 gene at 0.362%（76/21 006） and Mt12SrRNA at 0.176%（37/21 006）. Among the GJB2 genes, c.109G>A and c.235delC mutation detection rates were the highest, with 6.579%（1 382/21 006） and 1.795%（377/21 006）, respectively. Of the SLC26A4 genes, c.919-2A>G and c.2168A>G had the highest mutation rates of 1.423%（299/21 006） and 0.233%（49/21 106）, respectively. Regarding the allele frequency, GJB2 c.109G>A was the most common variant with an allele frequency of 3.359%（1 411/42 012）, followed by the GJB2 c.235delC at 0.897%（377/42 012） and the SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G at 0.719%（302/42 012）. Conclusion:23-site chip newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing showed that GJB2 c.109G>A mutation detection rate and allele frequency were the highest. This study has enriched the epidemiological data of 23-site chip genetic screening mutation profiles for neonatal deafness, which can provide evidence for clinical practice.

Hearing Loss: Genetic Testing, Current Advances and the Situation in Latin America.

Congenital hearing loss is the most common birth defect, estimated to affect 2-3 in every 1000 births, with ~50-60% of those related to genetic causes. Technological advances enabled the identification of hundreds of genes related to hearing loss (HL), with important implications for patients, their families, and the community. Despite these advances, in Latin America, the population with hearing loss remains underdiagnosed, with most studies focusing on a single locus encompassing the GJB2/GJB6 genes. Here we discuss how current and emerging genetic knowledge has the potential to alter the approach to diagnosis and management of hearing loss, which is the current situation in Latin America, and the barriers that still need to be overcome.

Analysis of deafness susceptibility gene of neonates in northern Guangdong, China.

This study aimed to explore the molecular epidemiology characteristics of deafness susceptibility genes in neonates in northern Guangdong and provide a scientific basis for deafness prevention and control. A total of 10,183 neonates were recruited between January 2018 and December 2022 at Yuebei People's Hospital. Among these, a PCR hybridization screening group of 8276 neonates was tested for four deafness genes: GJB2, SLC26A4, mtDNA, and GJB3 by PCR hybridization. Another group used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect genetic susceptibility genes in 1907 neonates. In PCR hybridization screening group, 346 (4.18%) of 8276 neonates were found to be carriers of the deafness gene. Among these, 182 (2.2%) had GJB2 variants, 114 (1.38%) had SLC26A4 variants, 35 (0.42%) had mtDNA variants, and 15 (0.18%) had GJB3 variants. In NGS Screening Group, 195 out of 1907 neonates were found to be carriers of the deafness gene, with a positive rate of 10.22%. Among these, 137 (7.18%) had GJB2 variants, 41 (2.15%) had SLC26A4 variants, 11 (0.58%) had mtDNA variants, and 6 (0.31%) had GJB3 variants. The prevalence of deafness gene variants was high in Northern Guangdong Province. The most common gene for deafness was GJB2, followed by SLC26A4 and mtDNA. GJB3 variants are rare. Compared with PCR hybridization method, NGS technology can expand the screening scope and greatly improve the detection rate of deafness genes. The c.109G>A of GJB2 was found to occur at a high frequency, which should be considered. Therefore, it is important to conduct neonatal deafness gene screening to prevent and control hereditary deafness.

A novel method for detecting nine hotspot mutations of deafness genes in one tube.

Deafness is a common sensory disorder. In China, approximately 70% of hereditary deafness originates from four common deafness-causing genes: GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and MT-RNR1. A single-tube rapid detection method based on 2D-PCR technology was established for nine mutation sites in the aforementioned genes, and Sanger sequencing was used to verify its reliability and accuracy. The frequency of hotspot mutations in deafness genes was analysed in 116 deaf students. 2D-PCR identified 27 genotypes of nine loci according to the melting curve of the FAM, HEX, and Alexa568 fluorescence channels. Of the 116 deaf patients, 12.9% (15/116) carried SLC26A4 mutations, including c.919-2A > G and c.2168A > G (allele frequencies, 7.3% and 2.2%, respectively). The positivity rate (29.3%; 34/116) was highest for GJB2 (allele frequency, 15.9% for c.235delC, 6.0% for c.299_300delAT, and 2.6% for c.176-191del16). Sanger sequencing confirmed the consistency of results between the detection methods based on 2D-PCR and DNA sequencing. Common pathogenic mutations in patients with non-syndromic deafness in Changzhou were concentrated in GJB2 (c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, and c.176-191del16) and SLC26A4 (c.919-2A > G and c.2168 A > G). 2D-PCR is an effective method for accurately and rapidly identifying deafness-related genotypes using a single-tube reaction, and is superior to DNA sequencing, which has a high cost and long cycle.

Factors that influence health service access in deaf and hard-of-hearing children: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: Early diagnosis and intervention of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children leads to improved language and psychosocial outcomes. However, many child, parent and provider related factors can influence access to early intervention services, including hearing devices. This narrative review aims to explore factors that influence health service access in DHH children. DESIGN: A systematic search was conducted to identify articles that explored factors that influenced health service access in DHH children in countries with Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, published between 2010 and 2022. STUDY SAMPLES: Fifty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. This included 4 systematic reviews, 2 reviews, 39 quantitative and 5 mixed methods studies and 9 qualitative studies. RESULTS: The identified factors were grouped into the following themes: (a) demographic factors, (b) family related factors, (c) child related factors, (d) factors specific to hearing devices, (e) service delivery, f) telehealth and (g) COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This review provided a comprehensive summary of multiple factors that affect access to health services in DHH children. Psychosocial support, consistent clinical advice, allocation of resources to rural communities and use of telehealth are possible ways to address barriers and improve health service access.

Longitudinal Analysis of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program Performance.

OBJECTIVES: Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) is a newborn hearing screening system created to detect infants with hearing loss (HL) and intervene to reduce language and communication impairment. Early hearing detection (EHD) consists of three sequential stages: identification, screening, and diagnostic testing. This study longitudinally reviews each stage of EHD in each state and proposes a framework to improve utilization of EHD data. DESIGN: A retrospective public database review was conducted, accessing publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary descriptive statistics were utilized to generate a descriptive study of EHDI programs in each U.S. state from 2007 to 2016. RESULTS: Data over 10 years from 50 states as well as Washington, DC were included in this analysis, creating up to 510 data points per analysis. Hundred percent (85 to 105) (median [min to max]) of newborns were identified by and entered EHDI programs. Ninety-eight percent (51 to 100) of identified infants completed screening. Of the infants who screened positive for HL, the proportion that received diagnostic testing was 55% (1 to 100). The overall proportion of infants who failed to complete EHD was 3% (1 to 51). Of the infants who fail to complete EHD 70% (0 to 100) are from missed screenings, 24% (0 to 95) are from missed diagnostic testing, and 0% (0 to 93) are from missed identification. Although there are more infants missed at screening, it was estimated, with limitations, that there is an order of magnitude more infants with HL among those who did not complete diagnostic testing compared with those who did not complete screening. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis demonstrates high completion rates at both identification and screening stages, whereas the diagnostic testing stage demonstrates low and highly variable completion rates. The low completion rates at diagnostic testing create a bottleneck in the EHD process and the large variability impedes the comparison of HL outcomes across states. Analysis also demonstrates that among all stages of EHD, whereas the largest number of infants are missed at screening, the largest number of children with HL are likely missed at diagnostic testing. Therefore, a focus by individual EHDI programs on addressing causes of low diagnostic testing completion rates would yield the greatest increase in the identification of children with HL. Potential causes of low diagnostic testing completion rates are further discussed. Finally, a new vocabulary framework is proposed to facilitate further study of EHD outcomes.

Next-generation sequencing for genetic testing of hearing loss populations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hearing loss is a common sensorineural disease with genetic heterogeneity. More than 140 genes are known to cause hereditary hearing loss. We aim to uncover the etiologies of hearing loss and provide patients with reasonable reproductive choices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 825 participants were recruited, including 74 individuals, 47 couples, and 219 families, to identify the molecular etiologies of hearing loss using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Novel mutations were verified with a minigene splicing assay and the construction of three-dimensional protein models. RESULTS: A positive molecular diagnosis was obtained for 244 patients, a rate of 63.05 %. Total 470 mutations were identified in 18 causative genes in positive patients. The most common genes mutated were GJB2 and SLC26A4. 47 novel mutations were identified. Further analysis predicted that two splicing mutations would cause abnormal mRNA splicing and three missense mutations would affect the protein structure. The results of prenatal diagnosis showed that the genotypes of 15 fetuses were the same as the probands. CONCLUSION: Our findings expand the mutation spectrum of hearing loss and highlight the importance of genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis to allow accurate and personalized guidance for those at high risk of deafness.

Mutation analysis of GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3 and mtDNA12SrRNA genes in 251 non-syndromic hearing loss patients in Fujian, China.

OBJECTIVES: The molecular etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) in Southeastern China (Fujian) has not been precisely identified. our study selected patients with NSHL and analyzed their causative genes, which helped to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss (HHL) and its treatment. METHODS: 251 unrelated patients who attended the otolaryngology clinic of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital with hearing loss were enrolled to our study. All patients had genetic tests and listening tests, of which 251 were diagnosed with NSHL. In addition, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) in a patient who has a significant family history of HHL but negative for gene chip testing, as well as in his family members. RESULT: Among of 251 patients, Nucleotide changes were found in 63 cases (25.09%), including 34 located in GJB2(13.5%, including 235delC and 299_300delAT), 13 located in SLC26A4(5.18%, including c.919-2G > A and 2168 A > G), 1 located in GJB3(0.4%,538C > T) and 16 located in mtDNA12SrRNA (6.37%,1555 A > G). In addition, we discuss the process of identifying novel PLS1 mutations from 251 patients. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the conventional deafness gene mutation in 251 NSHL patients in Fujian, China. Compared with the other area of China, we have a lower detection rate, but GJB2 235delC remains the most common mutation in Fujian. In addition, we discuss the process of discovering novel mutation locus for deafness, which provides an understanding for deafness diagnosis and genetic testing.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of pre-pregnancy genetic screening for deafness: an empirical study in China.

Objectives: This research aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pre-pregnancy deafness screening policies. Methods: Married couples from Shanghai, Beijing, and Suzhou in China were enrolled. We conducted high-throughput, pre-pregnancy genetic screenings for deafness in women and their partners. We compared the cost-effectiveness of deafness genetic screening with the status quo. The two-step screening (wife then partner) and following treatments and interventions were included in the decision tree model. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the decrease in deaf newborns, healthy newborn births, and cost-utility analysis of pre-pregnancy deafness genetic screening separately. Cost, utility, and probability data used in the three models were collected from a survey combined with literature and expert consultants. A 5% discount rate and a series of one-way sensitivity analyses along with a Monte Carlo simulation were used to test the reliability of this research. Results: Between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 31, 2021, we recruited 6,200 females and 540 male spouses from community health service centers in Shanghai, Beijing, and Suzhou. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for reducing deaf newborn births was USD 32,656 per case and USD 1,203,926 per case for increasing one healthy newborn birth. This gap exists because of the overall decrease of newborn births. From the perspective of the whole society, deafness genetic screening is not cost-effective for reducing the overall quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in the population. Discussion: Pre-pregnancy genetic testing is effective in decreasing the occurrence of congenital deafness. It is a cost-saving measure when compared with the costs of future medical expenditure and income loss for the affected families. However, such screening and preventive avoidance of pregnancy will decrease the population size and QALY. Only post-screening ART with PGT was shown to increase the birth of healthy newborns. Focusing on key groups such as premature births or consanguineous couples may improve the societal effects of screening.

[Prospective comparative analysis of cochlear implant patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss with regard to health-related quality of life, tinnitus distress and psychological comorbidities]. / Prospektive Vergleichsanalyse von CI-Patienten mit einseitiger Taubheit und asymmetrischem Hörverlust hinsichtlich der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität, Tinnitusbelastung und psychischen Komorbiditäten.

BACKGROUND: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) are increasingly being treated with cochlear implants (CI) due to the demonstrated improvements in auditory abilities and quality of life. To date, there are few published studies in which these two groups are comparatively studied. The aim of the current study was to examine which factors differ between those two patient groups, especially preoperatively. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the previously published raw data of 66 prospectively recruited CI patients (21 SSD/45 AHL) was performed. In addition to the hearing outcome, tinnitus distress (tinnitus questionnaire), health-related quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, NCIQ), stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire, PSQ), and psychological comorbidities (General Depression Scale, ADS­L and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, GAD-7) were assessed in SSD and AHL patients pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, SSD patients showed significantly higher scores in the NCIQ subdomains "elementary" and "advanced sound perception" than the AHL group. Stress (PSQ) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) were significantly higher preoperatively in SSD patients than in AHL patients. After CI, these differences were strongly reduced, with minimal differences being detectable between the groups in the investigated domains postoperatively. CONCLUSION: SSD and AHL patients differ significantly preoperatively in terms of their subjective hearing assessment and psychosocial parameters. In SSD patients, psychological stress factors may have a stronger impact on the quality of life than in AHL patients. These aspects should be taken into account in the preoperative counseling and postoperative rehabilitation.

Case report: mitochondrial diabetes mellitus in a Chinese family due to m.3243A>G.

OBJECTIVES: Mitochondrial diabetes mellitus is caused by dysfunctional mitochondria and is often misdiagnosed because of its various clinical manifestations. It's even rarer in children, and without a clear family history of diabetes with hearing loss, it's often difficult to diagnose. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a case study of a family with maternally inherited diabetes mellitus and deafness (MIDD). The proband was an adolescent girl with diabetes with a family history of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for three generations. Family members have undetected hearing impaired. The proband could not be diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) or T2DM. Therefore, whole exome and mitochondrial gene sequencing was performed, which identified an m.3243A>G mutation in the mitochondrial DNA. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that we should be alert to the possibility of hereditary diabetes, especially mitochondrial diabetes in patients with atypical diabetes. A thorough physical examination is very important. What is new: (1) Mitochondrial diabetes in childhood may not be accompanied by deafness even with highly heteroplasmy levels. (2) In MIDD patients, sometimes hearing loss cannot be perceived, which requires us to conduct detailed physical examinations and related examinations. (3) The use of metformin in MIDD patients did not have adverse consequences.

Assessing Autism in Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Youths: Interdisciplinary Teams, COVID Considerations, and Future Directions.

Autism spectrum disorders are more prevalent in children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (D/HH) than in the general population. This potential for diagnostic overlap underscores the importance of understanding the best approaches for assessing autism spectrum disorder in D/HH youths. Despite the recognition of clinical significance, youths who are D/HH are often identified as autistic later than individuals with normal hearing, which results in delayed access to appropriate early intervention services. Three primary barriers to early identification include behavioral phenotypic overlap, a lack of "gold-standard" screening and diagnostic tools for this population, and limited access to qualified clinicians. In the current article, we seek to address these barriers to prompt an appropriate identification of autism by providing recommendations for autism assessment in children who are D/HH from an interdisciplinary hearing and development clinic, including virtual service delivery during COVID-19. Strengths, gaps, and future directions for implementation are addressed.

[Results of combined newborn hearing and deafness gene screening in Yuncheng area of Shanxi Province].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical significance of combined newborn hearing and deafness gene screening in Yuncheng area of Shanxi Province. METHODS: Results of audiological examinations, including transient evoked otoacoustic emission and automatic discriminative auditory brainstem evoked potentials, for 6 723 newborns born in Yuncheng area from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Those who failed one of the tests were considered to have failed the examination. A deafness-related gene testing kit was used to detect 15 hot spot variants of common deafness-associated genes in China including GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and mtDNA12S rRNA. Neonates who had passed the audiological examinations and those who had not were compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: Among the 6 723 neonates, 363 (5.40%) were found to carry variants. These have included 166 cases (2.47%) with GJB2 gene variants, 136 cases (2.03%) with SLC26A4 gene variants, 26 cases (0.39%) with mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene variants, and 33 cases (0.49%) with GJB3 gene variants. Among the 6 723 neonates, 267 had failed initial hearing screening, among which 244 had accepted a re-examination, for which 14 cases (5.73%) had failed again. This has yielded an approximate prevalence of hearing disorder of 0.21% (14/6 723). Among 230 newborns who had passed the re-examination, 10 (4.34%) were found to have carried a variant. By contrast, 4 out of the 14 neonates (28.57%) who had failed the re-examination had carried a variant, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Genetic screening can provide an effective supplement to newborn hearing screening, and the combined screening can provide a best model for the prevention of hearing loss, which can enable early detection of deafness risks, targeted prevention measures, and genetic counseling to provide accurate prognosis for the newborns.

Postnatal genetic umbilical cord analysis for earliest possible detection of inherited hearing impairment.

INTRODUCTION: The most common sensorineural disorder in humans is hearing impairment and approximately 60% of prelingual hearing disorders are genetic. Especially parents with a congenital deaf child want to know as early as possible whether their second born child has the same genetic defect or not. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that postnatal genetic umbilical cord analysis is both the earliest detection possibility and sufficient. METHODS: We included first born children with severe hearing impairment that underwent cochlear implantation. All included patients were analyzed genetically and exhibited mutations of either DFNB1 loci or SLC26A4 gene. Additionally, the umbilical cord of the sibling underwent genetic analysis to detect hereditary genetic mutations as early as possible. RESULTS: 49 newborn children out of 22 families were included in this study. Genetic analysis revealed clinical relevant mutations in all first born children and in four siblings via umbilical cord analysis. All patients who have been diagnosed with a relevant genetic mutation that caused severe hearing impairment underwent hearing rehabilitation via cochlear implant surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the sufficient and early as possible detection of known genetically hearing disorders via umbilical cord analysis. In case of a known familial genetic hearing disorder, it is advisable to analyze newborn siblings for the corresponding genetic defect as soon as possible, to be able to plan and initiate clinical care for the patient as early as possible. It is also extremely important for the parents to obtain clear information about the auditory status of the newborn.

[Psychiatric diagnoses and treatment of deaf and hearing-impaired patients]. / Psychiatrische diagnostiek en behandeling bij doven en slechthorenden.

BACKGROUND: In the general mental health care the psychiatric diagnosis is the major focus of treatment. With deaf and hard of hearing clients a boarder scope is needed to include the impact of language development on the psychiatric diagnoses. AIM: Clarifying challenges and possibilities in mental health treatment of deaf and hard of hearing clients. METHOD: Following the steps of the treatment process we will elaborate on challenges and possibilities in diagnosing and evidence-based treatment methods. RESULTS: Treatment of psychiatric diagnoses of deaf and hard of hearing clients can be very effective if offered in sign language, with respect for cultural aspects and slight adjustments to treatment methods as CBT, EMDR, schema-focused therapy and psychopharmaceuticals. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the deaf and hard of hearing experience is crucial in the treatment of psychiatric diagnoses of patients.

Molecular diagnosis of hereditary deafness and application of stepwise testing strategy.

Hereditary deafness is one of the most common sensory disorders in humans, and exhibits high genetic heterogeneity. At present, the commonly used molecular diagnostic methods include gene chip, Sanger sequencing, targeted enrichment sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing, with diagnosis rates reaching 33.5%-56.67%. However, there are still a considerable number of patients who can not get a timely and definitive molecular diagnosis. Furthermore, considering the economic burden on patients' families and the relatively high cost of whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, it is vital to provide stepwise strategies combining multiple detection methods according to the phenotypes of patients. In this review, we evaluate and discuss the utility of molecular diagnosis and the application of stepwise testing strategies in hereditary deafness to provide reference for the selection of diagnostic strategies.

Identification a novel pathogenic LRTOMT mutation in Mauritanian families with nonsyndromic deafness.

PURPOSE: Although recessive mutations in GJB2 are the common genetic etiology of sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI), variants in LRTOMT gene were also identified, mostly in Middle East and North African populations. METHODS: Using Sanger sequencing we screened the exon 7 of LRTOMT in a cohort of 128 unrelated Mauritanian children with congenital deafness. RESULTS: Only one biallelic missense mutation, predicted as pathogenic (c.179 T > C;p.Leu60Pro) was found at homozygous state in four families. This variant, not reported before, showed a deleterious effect by SIFT (score: 0.01) and a disease-causing effect by Mutation Taster (prob: 1). Exploration of the encoded protein 3D structure revealed a disruption from an organized α helix (in the normal protein structure) into a random conformation. Early fitting of a cochlear implant seemed to improve the audition ability of the mutation carrier. CONCLUSION: Further screening using a panel of deafness genes may expose other variants underlying hearing impairment in our population.