Validating the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire in Danish.

INTRODUCTION: Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) may result in hearing loss, chronic otitis and cholesteatoma. With advances in treatment options, the identification of patients with obstructive ETD is becoming increasingly important. The objective of this study was to validate a Danish translation of the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). METHODS: All participants underwent tympanometry, otomicroscopy and completed the ETDQ-7. We included 34 ears from patients with obstructive ETD who had abnormal tympanometry curves but no history of cholesteatoma or adhesive otitis. As a control group, 48 otherwise healthy ears with a normal tympanometry curve were included from patients with known sensorineural hearing loss or normal hearing. RESULTS: A Cronbach's alpha of 0.77 indicated a good internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire. The mean ETDQ-7 score in the obstructive ETD group was 31 versus 13.5 in the control group (p = 0.00). A receiver operating characteristics analysis produced an area under the curve of 94%, showing excellent discriminatory abilities between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The ETDQ-7 has previously been validated in English, German, Dutch and Portuguese, demonstrating good clinical relevance. The Danish translation of the ETDQ-7 has produced similar results and may be valuable in diagnosing obstructive ETD and in monitoring the effect of balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube. FUNDING: none. The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (VD-2018-33, I-Suite 6229).

Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo: Diagnostic criteria.

This paper presents the diagnostic criteria for hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo to be included in the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (ICVD). The aim of defining diagnostic criteria of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is to help clinicians to understand the terminology related to orthostatic dizziness/vertigo and to distinguish orthostatic dizziness/vertigo due to global brain hypoperfusion from that caused by other etiologies. Diagnosis of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo requires: A) five or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness or vertigo triggered by arising or present during upright position, which subsides by sitting or lying down; B) orthostatic hypotension, postural tachycardia syndrome or syncope documented on standing or during head-up tilt test; and C) not better accounted for by another disease or disorder. Probable hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is defined as follows: A) five or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness or vertigo triggered by arising or present during upright position, which subsides by sitting or lying down; B) at least one of the following accompanying symptoms: generalized weakness/tiredness, difficulty in thinking/concentrating, blurred vision, and tachycardia/palpitations; and C) not better accounted for by another disease or disorder. These diagnostic criteria have been derived by expert consensus from an extensive review of 90 years of research on hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo, postural hypotension or tachycardia, and autonomic dizziness. Measurements of orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate are important for the screening and documentation of orthostatic hypotension or postural tachycardia syndrome to establish the diagnosis of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo.

Agreement between diagnoses of otitis media by audiologists and otolaryngologists in Aboriginal Australian children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree of agreement of diagnoses by audiologists and otolaryngologists of otitis media (OM) in Aboriginal children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of agreement between diagnoses. SETTING: Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health (SEARCH), a prospective cohort study of Aboriginal children attending four Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services in New South Wales (three metropolitan, one regional) during 2008-2012. PARTICIPANTS: 1310 of 1669 SEARCH participants (78.5%; mean age, 7.0 years; SD, 4.4 years) were assessed and received a diagnosis from one of five experienced audiologists. Test results (but not case histories) were forwarded to one of three otolaryngologists for blinded independent assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement of OM diagnoses by audiologists and otolaryngologists at ear and child levels; correctness of audiologist diagnoses (otolaryngologist diagnosis as reference). RESULTS: Paired diagnoses by audiologists and otolaryngologists were available for 863 children at the child level and 1775 ears (989 children) at the ear level. Otolaryngologists diagnosed OM in 251 children (29.1%), including 11 (1.3%) with tympanic membrane perforation, and in 396 ears (22.3%), including 12 (0.7%) with perforation. Agreement between audiologists and otolaryngologists for OM at the ear level was 92.2% (κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82), and at the child level 91.7% (κ = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). No otolaryngologist-diagnosed perforation was missed by audiologists. Among 1000 children triaged by an audiologist, there would be 45 false positives and 30 false negatives when compared with assessments by an otolaryngologist, with no missed perforations. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial agreement between audiologists' and otolaryngologists' diagnoses of OM in a high prevalence population of Aboriginal children. In settings with limited access to otolaryngologists, audiologists may appropriately triage children and select those requiring specialist review.

Aetiological diagnosis of child deafness: CODEPEH recommendations. / Diagnóstico etiológico de la sordera infantil: recomendaciones de la CODEPEH.

Important progress in the fields of molecular genetics (principally) and diagnostic imaging, together with the lack of a consensus protocol for guiding the diagnostic process after confirming deafness by neonatal screening, have led to this new work document drafted by the Spanish Commission for the Early Detection of Child Deafness (Spanish acronym: CODEPEH). This 2015 Recommendations Document, which is based on the most recent scientific evidence, provides guidance to professionals to support them in making decisions regarding aetiological diagnosis. Such diagnosis should be performed without delay and without impeding early intervention. Early identification of the causes of deafness offers many advantages: it prevents unnecessary trouble for the families, reduces health system expenses caused by performing different tests, and provides prognostic information that may guide therapeutic actions.

Diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease.

This paper presents diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease jointly formulated by the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society, The Japan Society for Equilibrium Research, the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology (EAONO), the Equilibrium Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) and the Korean Balance Society. The classification includes two categories: definite Menière's disease and probable Menière's disease. The diagnosis of definite Menière's disease is based on clinical criteria and requires the observation of an episodic vertigo syndrome associated with low- to medium-frequency sensorineural hearing loss and fluctuating aural symptoms (hearing, tinnitus and/or fullness) in the affected ear. Duration of vertigo episodes is limited to a period between 20 minutes and 12 hours. Probable Menière's disease is a broader concept defined by episodic vestibular symptoms (vertigo or dizziness) associated with fluctuating aural symptoms occurring in a period from 20 minutes to 24 hours.

[Criteria to evaluate hearing disorders under exposure to noise: comparative analysis of national and foreign methodic approaches].

Comparative analysis covered national and foreign criteria and methodic approaches to evaluation of hearing disorders due to noise exposure. Ways to improve these criteria and approaches are suggested, also in aim to harmonize them with the foreign ones.

Understanding protocol performance: impact of criterion and test correlation.

BACKGROUND: A test protocol is created when individual tests are combined. Protocol performance can be calculated prior to clinical use; however, the necessary information is seldom available. Thus, protocols are frequently used with limited information as to performance. The next best strategy is to base protocol design on available information combined with a thorough understanding of the factors that determine protocol performance. Unfortunately, there is limited information as to these factors and how they interact. PURPOSE: The objective of this article and the next article in this issue is to examine in detail the three factors that determine protocol performance: (1) protocol criterion, (2) test correlation, (3) test performance. This article examines protocol criterion and test correlation. The next article examines the impact of individual test performance and summarizes the results of this series. The ultimate goal is to provide guidance on the formulation of a protocol using available information and an understanding of the impact of these three factors on performance. RESEARCH DESIGN: A mathematical model is used to calculate protocol performance for different protocol criteria and test correlations while assuming that all individual tests in the protocol have the same performance. The advantages and disadvantages of the different criteria are evaluated for different test correlations. RESULTS: A loose criterion will produce the highest protocol hit and false alarm rates; however, the false alarm rate may be unacceptably high. A strict criterion will produce the smallest protocol hit and false alarm rates; however, the hit rate may be unacceptably low. Adding tests to a protocol increases the probability that the protocol false alarm rate will be too high with a loose criterion and that the protocol hit rate will be too low with a strict criterion. The intermediate criterion, about which little has been known, provides advantages not available with the other two criteria. This criterion is much more likely to produce acceptable protocol hit and false alarm rates. It also has the potential to simultaneously produce a protocol hit rate higher, and a false alarm rate lower, than the individual tests. The intermediate criteria produce better protocol performance than the loose and strict criteria for protocols with the same number of tests. For all criteria, best protocol performance is obtained when the tests are uncorrelated and decreases as test correlation increases. When there is some test correlation, adding tests to the protocol can decrease protocol performance for a loose or strict criterion. The ability of a protocol to manipulate hit and false alarm rates, or improve performance relative to that of the individual tests, is reduced with increasing test correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The three criteria, loose, strict, and intermediate, have definite advantages and disadvantages over a large range of test correlations. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of the loose and strict criteria are impacted by test correlation. The advantages of the intermediate criteria are relatively independent of test correlation. When three or more tests are used in a protocol, consideration should be given to using an intermediate criterion, particularly if there is some test correlation. Greater test correlation diminishes the advantages of adding tests to a protocol, particularly with a loose or strict criterion. At higher test correlations, fewer tests in the protocol may be appropriate.

Understanding protocol performance: impact of test performance.

BACKGROUND: This is the second of two articles that examine the factors that determine protocol performance. The objective of these articles is to provide a general understanding of protocol performance that can be used to estimate performance, establish limits on performance, decide if a protocol is justified, and ultimately select a protocol. The first article was concerned with protocol criterion and test correlation. It demonstrated the advantages and disadvantages of different criterion when all tests had the same performance. It also examined the impact of increasing test correlation on protocol performance and the characteristics of the different criteria. PURPOSE: To examine the impact on protocol performance when individual tests in a protocol have different performance. This is evaluated for different criteria and test correlations. The results of the two articles are combined and summarized. RESEARCH DESIGN: A mathematical model is used to calculate protocol performance for different protocol criteria and test correlations when there are small to large variations in the performance of individual tests in the protocol. RESULTS: The performance of the individual tests that make up a protocol has a significant impact on the performance of the protocol. As expected, the better the performance of the individual tests, the better the performance of the protocol. Many of the characteristics of the different criteria are relatively independent of the variation in the performance of the individual tests. However, increasing test variation degrades some criteria advantages and causes a new disadvantage to appear. This negative impact increases as test variation increases and as more tests are added to the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Best protocol performance is obtained when individual tests are uncorrelated and have the same performance. In general, the greater the variation in the performance of tests in the protocol, the more detrimental this variation is to protocol performance. Since this negative impact is increased as more tests are added to the protocol, greater test variation indicates using fewer tests in the protocol.

Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.

OBJECTIVE: Auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) to multiple air conduction (AC) stimuli modulated at ∼80 Hz have been shown to provide reasonable estimates of the behavioral audiogram. To distinguish the type of hearing loss (i.e., conductive, sensorineural, or mixed), bone conduction (BC) results are necessary. There are few BC-ASSR data, especially for individuals with hearing loss. The present studies aimed to (1) determine multiple ASSR thresholds to BC stimuli in adults with normal hearing, masker-simulated hearing loss, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and (2) determine how well BC-ASSR distinguishes normal versus elevated thresholds to BC stimuli in adults with normal hearing or SNHL. DESIGN: Multiple ASSR and behavioral thresholds for BC stimuli were determined in two studies. Study A assessed 16 normal-hearing adults with relatively flat threshold elevations produced by 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL AC masking noise, as well as no masking. Study B assessed 10 adults with normal hearing and 40 adults with SNHL. In both studies, the multiple (500 to 4000 Hz) ASSR stimuli were modulated between 77 and 101 Hz and varied in intensity from 0 to 50 dB HL in 10-dB steps. Stimuli were presented using a B71 bone oscillator held on the temporal bone by an elastic band while participants relaxed or slept. RESULTS: Study A: Correlations (r) between behavioral and ASSR thresholds for all conditions combined were 0.77, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.87 for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. ASSR minus behavioral threshold difference scores for all frequencies combined for the no-masker, 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL masker conditions were 14.3 ± 9.2, 12.1 ± 10.4, 12.7 ± 7.7, and 11.4 ± 8.1 dB, respectively. Study B: The difference scores for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were, on average, 15.7 ± 12.3, 10.3 ± 10.7, 9.7 ± 10.3, and 5.7 ± 7.9 dB, respectively, with correlations of 0.73, 0.84, 0.87, and 0.94 for the normal-hearing and SNHL groups combined. The ASSR minus behavioral difference scores were significantly larger for 500 Hz and significantly smaller for 4000 Hz compared with 1000 and 2000 Hz. Across all frequencies, the BC-ASSR correctly classified 89% of thresholds as "normal" or "elevated" (92% correct for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz). CONCLUSIONS: The threshold difference scores and correlations in individuals with SNHL are similar to those in normal listeners with simulated SNHL. These difference scores are also similar to those shown by previous studies for the AC-ASSR in individuals with SNHL, at least for 1000 to 4000 Hz. The BC-ASSR provides a reasonably good estimate of BC behavioral threshold in adults, especially between 1000 and 4000 Hz. Further research is required in infants with hearing loss.

Screening for hearing loss in the elderly using distortion product otoacoustic emissions, pure tones, and a self-assessment tool.

PURPOSE: To determine whether distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) could be used as a hearing screening tool with elderly individuals living independently, and to compare the utility of different screening protocols: (a) 3 pure-tone screening protocols consisting of 30 dB HL at 1, 2, and 3 kHz; 40 dB HL at 1, 2, and 3 kHz; or 40 dB HL at 1 and 2 kHz; (b) the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version (HHIE-S); (c) pure tones at 40 dB HL at 1 and 2 kHz plus the HHIE-S; and (d) DPOAEs. METHOD: A total of 106 elderly individuals age 65-91 years were screened using the above protocols. RESULTS: Pass/fail results showed that most individuals failed at 30 dB HL, followed by DPOAEs, the 40-dB HL protocols, the HHIE-S alone, and the combined pure-tone/HHIE-S protocol. All screening results were associated except the HHIE-S and 30 dB HL and the HHIE-S and DPOAEs. A McNemar analysis revealed that the differences between the correlated pass/fail results were significant except for the HHIE-S and 40 dB at 1 and 2 kHz. CONCLUSION: DPOAEs can be used to screen the elderly, with the advantage that individuals do not have to voluntarily respond to the test.

Observations on mastoid versus ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic in newborns and adults.

The cochlear microphonic (CM) may play an important role in the diagnosis of auditory neuropathy (AN) in newborns. However, since the CM tends to mirror the waveform of the acoustic stimulus, conscientious recording methodology must be applied to separate true response from artifact. The difficulty in achieving this separation has limited the clinical usefulness of the CM. In an effort to call attention to the importance of recording protocol when measuring the CM, the present study was designed to optimize CM recordings in humans by investigating the following parameters: (1) secondary minus electrode recording site (mastoid versus ear canal [EC]), (2) stimulus parameters, and (3) grounding and shielding conditions. Normative data were collected in full-term newborns (n = 7) and adults (n = 4) with no known risk factors for cochlear or retrocochlear pathology. Results suggest that the CM is easier to separate from stimulus artifact using an EC electrode and toneburst stimuli. In addition, electromagnetic shielding and grounding of the electrode cables and the acoustic transducer were effective in reducing and/or eliminating stimulus artifact. Results from this normative study may be helpful in improving the diagnostic utility of the CM in AN and other hearing-related disorders.

Primary assessment of the vertiginous patient at a pre-ENT balance clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Due to problems with long waiting times for assessment of vertiginous patients (more than 24 weeks), we changed practice and instituted a pre-ENT balance clinic assessment; we then audited the results. In particular, we looked at the subgroup with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen patients were seen at the pre-ENT balance clinic from October 2003 to September 2004. Those diagnosed with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo received particle repositioning therapy at the same clinic and did not subsequently need ENT assessment. RESULTS: By the end of the audit period, waiting times were reduced to three weeks, and more than one-quarter of vertiginous patients (i.e. those diagnosed with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo) did not need to be reviewed at an ENT clinic. CONCLUSION: We believe this to be the first study to present prospective data showing that patients with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo may be safely diagnosed and effectively managed at a pre-ENT balance clinic.

[Screening versus diagnostic tests: an update in the speech, language and hearing pathology practice]. / Testes de rastreamento x testes de diagnóstico: atualidades no contexto da atuação fonoaudiológica.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation instruments, properties, selection indicators, application and validation of screening and diagnostic tests. AIM: To present some concepts concerning screening and diagnostic tests and their application according to a specific purpose. To present a few practical examples of the application of these instruments related to human communication, as well as to present validation criteria of tests in the population and criteria used for the rational selection of screening or diagnostic instruments in health programs and health services based on epidemiological concepts indexed in Scielo, Lilacs or Medline up to January 2007. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic instruments differ from screening instruments in their objectives and eligibility criteria. Sensibility and specificity are two important indicators to be considered when choosing an instrument for screening or diagnosis. Reproducibility, time required to complete the evaluation and previous preparation of patients, if needed, are also indicators to be considered when choosing an instrument. Publication and information exchange regarding the properties of evaluation instruments, used for diagnosis or screening, related to the Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences must be systematically stimulated. Besides that, improving the knowledge about methodologies and evaluation instruments under different perspectives contribute to the better use of human and financial resources. Furthermore, the elaboration of studies that promote the correct validation of screening and diagnostic instruments used in human communication disorders contributes to the increase in knowledge in the field of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and, indirectly, to the acknowledgement of this science, based on technical-scientific evidence, in health promotion.

Testes de rastreamento x testes de diagnóstico: atualidades no contexto da atuação fonoaudiológica / Screening versus diagnostic tests: an update in the speech, language and hearing pathology practice

TEMA: instrumentos diagnósticos, propriedades e uso de indicadores para seleção, aplicação e validação de instrumentos de diagnóstico e de rastreamento. OBJETIVO: apresentar conceitos ligados aos instrumentos de avaliação e sua aplicação de acordo com o objetivo, seja rastreamento ou diagnóstico. Também são apresentados alguns exemplos práticos de aplicação de instrumentos de avaliação ligados à comunicação humana, bem como critérios de validação de testes na população e critérios utilizados para sua escolha e aplicação racional em serviços e programas de saúde a partir de pressupostos epidemiológicos pesquisados em artigos indexados nas bases de dados Scielo, Lilacs ou Medline até janeiro de 2007. CONCLUSÃO: instrumentos de avaliação e diagnóstico clínico diferem dos instrumentos de rastreamento em relação a seus objetivos e critérios de elegibilidade. São indicativos da precisão de um instrumento de avaliação, seja para rastreamento ou diagnóstico, a sensibilidade e a especificidade de tal instrumento. Questões como reprodutibilidade, tempo para realização do teste ou exame e preparação prévia do paciente também devem ser considerados quando da seleção de instrumentos de avaliação clínica. O conhecimento e disseminação de informações ligadas às propriedades dos instrumentos de avaliação ligados a Fonoaudiologia devem ser incentivados sistematicamente. Além disso, a ampliação da gama de conhecimentos acerca das diferentes perspectivas ligadas às metodologias e instrumentos diagnósticos contribuem com a melhor racionalização de recursos humanos e financeiros. A elaboração de estudos que promovam a validação dos instrumentos correntemente utilizados para rastreamento e diagnóstico dos distúrbios da comunicação humana colabora com o avanço do conhecimento ligado a Fonoaudiologia e, indiretamente, para com o reconhecimento da ciência fonoaudiológica, baseada em evidências técnico-científicas, na promoção da saúde.

BACKGROND: evaluation instruments, properties, selection indicators, application and validation of screening and diagnostic tests. AIM: to present some concepts concerning screening and diagnostic tests and their application according to a specific purpose. To present a few practical examples of the application of these instruments related to human communication, as well as to present validation criteria of tests in the population and criteria used for the rational selection of screening or diagnostic instruments in health programs and health services based on epidemiological concepts indexed in Scielo, Lilacs or Medline up to January 2007. CONCLUSION: diagnostic instruments differ from screening instruments in their objectives and eligibility criteria. Sensibility and specificity are two important indicators to be considered when choosing an instrument for screening or diagnosis. Reproducibility, time required to complete the evaluation and previous preparation of patients, if needed, are also indicators to be considered when choosing an instrument. Publication and information exchange regarding the properties of evaluation instruments, used for diagnosis or screening, related to the Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences must be systematically stimulated. Besides that, improving the knowledge about methodologies and evaluation instruments under different perspectives contribute to the better use of human and financial resources. Furthermore, the elaboration of studies that promote the correct validation of screening and diagnostic instruments used in human communication disorders contributes to the increase in knowledge in the field of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and, indirectly, to the acknowledgement of this science, based on technical-scientific evidence, in health promotion.

[Establishment of hearing defects relation with occupation in civil aviation crews].

Occupational neurosensory hypoacusis is essential in the pattern of ENT morbidity in civil aviation crews. How to establish relations between hearing problems and occupation in civil aviation is shown. The algorithm of occupational neurosensory hypoacusis diagnosis in civil flights crews is proposed.

How helpful is pneumatic otoscopy in improving diagnostic accuracy?

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic otoscopy is believed to be helpful in optimally assessing the presence or absence of middle ear effusion (MEE). Although expert clinicians teach the importance of this diagnostic skill to trainees, evidence exists that many pediatric providers do not typically perform pneumatic otoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the otoscopic accuracy within a group of clinicians improves with the pneumatic assessment when compared with the static assessment using videotaped otoendoscopic examinations (VOEs). METHODS: Residents and faculty from 2 pediatric training programs served as subjects. All viewed a set of 50 video otoscopic examinations of tympanic membranes (TMs) from a validated VOE developed previously for training purposes. The video displays each TM in a static presentation and then in a pneumatic (mobile) presentation, followed by a final static presentation. Each subject first viewed the initial static presentation of each TM and responded "yes/no" to the presence of MEE, and then viewed the pneumatic presentation of the same TM and again responded "yes/no" to the presence of MEE. We compared the accuracy of assessment for both the static and the pneumatic tests. RESULTS: Thirty-four pediatric residents and 6 clinical faculty participated. Accuracy (percent of total test items correct) on the pneumatic test was uniformly greater than accuracy on the static test. The mean absolute improvement in the accuracy from the static test (61%) to the pneumatic test (76%) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12%-18%). The mean relative improvement in accuracy from the static test to the pneumatic test was 26% (95% CI = 19%-32%). Higher accuracy on the VOE was associated with greater absolute (r = 0.57) and greater relative (r = 0.47) improvement. The mean relative improvement in sensitivity and specificity from static viewing to pneumatic viewing was 24% (95% CI = 15%-33%) and 42% (95% CI = 27%-58%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a video otoendoscopic test, we found that accurate identification of both the presence and the absence of MEE improved after pneumatic assessment of TM mobility. Providers who were more accurate at otoscopy, defined by higher video total test scores, benefited more from the pneumatic component than providers with lower scores.

Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening.

Congenital or acquired hearing loss in infants and children has been linked with lifelong deficits in speech and language acquisition, poor academic performance, personal-social maladjustments, and emotional difficulties. Identification of hearing loss through neonatal hearing screening as well as objective hearing screening of all infants and children can prevent or reduce many of these adverse consequences. This report outlines the risk indicators for hearing loss, provides guidance for when and how to assess hearing loss, and addresses hearing referral resources for children of all ages.

Diagnostic accuracy of acute maxillary sinusitis in adults in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of symptoms and signs used in diagnosing acute community-acquired maxillary sinusitis (ACAMS), and to find useful clinical predictors for diagnosing it in adults in primary care. DESIGN: Prospective study in the study group and retrospective study in the reference group. SETTING: One primary care centre in the study group and another in the reference group. SUBJECTS: 50 adults with prolonged upper respiratory tract infection > or = 7 days) or self-suspected maxillary sinusitis. As a reference group, an analysis of records and diagnoses made by GP of 45 adult patients with the same inclusion criteria from another primary care clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The signs and symptoms associated with the diagnosis of ACAMS by GP and otorhinolaryngologist. The value of CRP, ultrasound and peak nasal expiratory flow in the diagnosis. RESULTS: Neither ultrasound nor any of the clinical signs increased the accuracy of diagnosis. Peak nasal expiratory flow below the normal range was associated with the diagnosis of ACAMS (p = 0.03). The presence of an otorhinolaryngologist had an influence on GP practice when compared with the reference group. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of ACAMS is difficult with the available clinical methods. Peak nasal expiratory flow needs further study. New diagnostic means are needed.

Diagnostic certainty for acute otitis media.

Our primary objective was to assess diagnostic accuracy for acute otitis media (AOM) relative to the criterion standard established by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: middle-ear effusion (MEE) plus onset in the past 48 h of signs or symptoms of middle-ear inflammation. A secondary objective was to assess the potential reduction in antibiotic usage that could be achieved if clinicians managed AOM according to a consensus guideline developed by the New York Region Otitis Project (NYROP). A convenience sample of primary care practitioners were surveyed after diagnosing AOM in 135 children aged 0.3-11.8 years (median 2.4 years). Clinicians expressed high certainty for AOM diagnosis in 122/135 episodes (90%). The prevalence of true AOM was 70% with a positive predictive value for high certainty of 76%. Of the 40 false-positive diagnoses, 35 did not have MEE and 5 did not have acute signs or symptoms. The relative risk for receiving an antibiotic was 1.50 times higher when clinicians expressed certainty (P=0.005), which produced 31/120 (26%) potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. Initial antibiotics would not have been prescribed for 29% of episodes using the NYROP guidelines. More judicious use of antibiotics may result if clinicians deferred initial therapy in children without definitive AOM, particularly when the presence of MEE is uncertain.