Common Types of Supraventricular Tachycardia: Diagnosis and Management.

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is an abnormal rapid cardiac rhythm that involves atrial or atrioventricular node tissue from the His bundle or above. Paroxysmal SVT, a subset of supraventricular dysrhythmias, has three common types: atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, and atrial tachycardia. Presenting symptoms may include altered consciousness, chest pressure or discomfort, dyspnea, fatigue, lightheadedness, or palpitations. Diagnostic evaluation may be performed in the outpatient setting and includes a comprehensive history and physical examination, electrocardiography, and laboratory workup. Extended cardiac monitoring with a Holter monitor or event recorder may be needed to confirm the diagnosis. Acute management of paroxysmal SVT is similar across the various types and is best completed in the emergency department or hospital setting. In patients who are hemodynamically unstable, synchronized cardioversion is first-line management. In those who are hemodynamically stable, vagal maneuvers are first-line management, followed by stepwise medication management if ineffective. Beta blockers and/or calcium channel blockers may be used acutely or for long-term suppressive therapy. When evaluating patients for paroxysmal SVTs, clinicians should have a low threshold for referral to a cardiologist for electrophysiologic study and appropriate intervention such as ablation. Clinicians should use a patient-centered approach when formulating a long-term management plan for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Catheter ablation has a high success rate and is recommended as the first-line method for long-term management of recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal SVT, including Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Dual atrioventricular nodal non-reentrant tachycardia: Various atrioventricular conduction responses to atrioventricular simultaneous pacing.

BACKGROUND: Specific pacing methods to unmask the existence of the dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway in patients with dual AV nodal non-reentrant tachycardia remain to be established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the electrophysiological characteristics of dual AV nodal non-reentrant tachycardia by its responses to specific pacing methods. METHODS: Five patients diagnosed as having dual AV nodal non-reentrant tachycardia were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: Atrial pacing could not induce the clinical tachycardia as continuous double firing in any of the 5 patients, but did induce sudden prolongation of the A-H interval as the linking phenomenon in 1 patient. A single atrial extrastimulation after sinus excitations was performed without interruption of double firing in 1 patient, and it induced the double ventricular response phenomenon within the limited range of the extrastimulus intervals. The pacing method of AV simultaneous basic pacing preceding atrial programmed extrastimulation did not allow interruptions of double firing during the basic drive trains and induced the double ventricular response phenomenon within the limited range of the extrastimulus intervals in all 5 patients, even in 1 patient without inducibility of the clinical tachycardia in the catheterization laboratory. The double ventricular response phenomenon within the limited range of the extrastimulus intervals may be based on the existence of the dual AV nodal pathway with concealed retrograde penetration. CONCLUSION: The AV simultaneous basic pacing preceding atrial programmed extrastimulation method consistently and reproducibly unmasked the existence of the dual AV nodal pathway as the double ventricular response phenomenon in patients with dual AV nodal non-reentrant tachycardia.

Assessment of atrial functional remodeling in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with and without drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern: A case-control study.

PURPOSE: The time interval between the onset of the P-wave on electrocardiogram (ECG) and peak A' velocity of the lateral left atrial wall assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (PA-TDI interval) determine total atrial conduction time (TACT) which reflects atrial remodeling and arrhythmic substrate. In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess TACT in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with and without drug-induced type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram ECG pattern (DI-Type 1 BrP) and control subjects. METHODS: Study population consisted of 62 consecutive patients (46 women; mean age 44 ± 12 years) undergoing electrophysiological study and ablation for symptomatic, drug-resistant AVNRT, and 42 age-matched and sex-matched control subjects. All patients and control subjects underwent ajmaline challenge test and tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: A DI-Type 1 BrP was uncovered in 24 of 62 patients with AVNRT (38.7%). PA-TDI interval was similar among AVNRT patients with and without DI-Type 1 BrP (124 ± 12 ms vs 119 ± 14 ms, respectively, P = .32), but significantly longer in patients with AVNRT with as well as without DI-Type 1 BrP than in control subjects (124 ± 12 ms and 119 ± 14 ms vs 105 ± 11 ms, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The TACT assessed by PA-TDI interval is longer in patients with AVNRT with and without DI-Type 1 BrP than in age-matched and sex-matched healthy control subjects.

Automated rhythm-based control of radiofrequency ablation close to the atrioventricular node: Preclinical, animal, and first-in-human testing.

BACKGROUND: The risk of heart block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia and septal accessory pathways is minimized by rapidly ceasing ablation in response to markers of risk, such as atrioventricular dissociation, fast junctional rhythm, PR interval prolongation, or 2 consecutive atrial or ventricular depolarizations. Currently this is done manually. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to build and test a control system able to monitor cardiac rhythm and automatically terminate ablation energy when required. METHODS: The device was built from off-shelf componentry. Preclinical testing involved real-time input of electrogram/electrocardiogram data from 209 ablation procedures (20 patients) over slow (n = 19) and fast (n = 1) AV nodal pathways. The device response speed was compared with the human response speed. The device's ability to prevent heart block was tested in 5 sheep. First-in-human testing was then performed in 12 patients undergoing AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation. RESULTS: Risk conditions necessitating shutoff of ablation (200 total; 111 preclinical and 89 first-in-human) were detected by the device with 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity, automatically terminating ablation while still allowing successful ablation in all patients. Device shutoff of ablation was always faster than human response (median difference 1.24 seconds). In each of 5 sheep, 40 consecutive attempts to cause heart block by ablating over the His bundle were unsuccessful because of automatic shutoff in response to rhythm change. CONCLUSION: Automated shutoff of ablation close to the AV node in response to markers of the risk of heart block is feasible with high accuracy as well as faster response than human response. The system may improve the safety of ablation near the AV node by preventing heart block.

Quality of life assessment in children before and after a successful ablation for supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Young patients suffering from rhythm disorders have a negative impact in their quality of life. In recent years, ablation has become the first-line therapy for supraventricular arrhythmias in children. In the light of the current expertise and advancement in the field, we decided to evaluate the quality of life in young patients with supraventricular arrhythmias before and after a percutaneous ablation procedure. METHODS: The prospective cohort consisted of patients <18 years with structurally normal hearts and non-pre-excited supraventricular arrhythmias, who had an ablation in our centre from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was evaluated with the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales self-questionnaire prior to and post-ablation. RESULTS: The final cohort included 88 patients consisted of 52 males (59%), with a mean age at ablation of 12.5 ± 3.3 years. Forty-two patients (48%) had a retrograde-only accessory pathway mediating the tachycardia, 38 (43%) had atrio-ventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, 7 (8%) had ectopic atrial tachycardia, and 1 (1%) had atrial flutter. The main reason for an ablation was the patient's choice in 53%. There were no severe complications. Comparison between the baseline and post-ablation assessments showed that patients reported significant improvement in the scores for physical health, emotional and social functioning, as well as in the total scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the successful treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias by means of an ablation results in a significant improvement in the quality of self-reported life scores in young patients.

Ventriculoatrial conduction in patients without high-grade AV block: when is it present?

INTRODUCTION: Ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is a critical component in many arrhythmias, has a diagnostic value in electrophysiology study (EPS), and is implicated in pacemaker-mediated arrhythmias. This study sought to characterize retrograde conduction during EPS and to utilize it as a diagnostic tool in patients without AV block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with intact AV conduction undergoing EPS were included in this study to systematically evaluate baseline VA conduction. If absent, parahisian pacing was used to determine the level of block (nodal or infranodal). Recovery of VA conduction with increased sympathetic activity was assessed with isoproterenol infusion. Baseline characteristics and electrophysiological data were collected and analyzed. Among the 801 patients studied, VA conduction was present in 98% (81% at baseline and 17% after isoproterenol infusion). Parahisian pacing demonstrated that the block was at the AV node level among 150 patients with VA dissociation at baseline. Among patients presenting with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 98.7% with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) had VA conduction at baseline versus 82.7% presenting with other SVT (atrial fibrillation excluded), P < 0.001. Thus, the absence of VA conduction at baseline during an EPS for SVT carries a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.9% for AVNRT. CONCLUSIONS: VA conduction is present in most patients (98%) with intact AV conduction. The level of VA dissociation when present at baseline is always at the level of the AV node. Patients with SVT presenting for EPS that lacked VA conduction at baseline were unlikely to have AVNRT.

Symptomatic arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), catheter ablation is considered as first-line therapy. Despite high success rates, some patients present with arrhythmia recurrence or develop other types of arrhythmias over time. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of symptomatic arrhythmias after initially successful AVNRT ablation and to analyze their clinical implications in a real-world cohort. METHODS: We included 2,795 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first ablation of AVNRT between 01/2007 and 01/2010. In patients alive at long-term follow-up, patient-specific characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between patients with (group A) and without (group B) any symptomatic arrhythmia during follow-up. RESULTS: Symptomatic arrhythmias occurred in 17.2% of patients during a mean follow-up of 678 days after AVNRT ablation. The patients with symptomatic arrhythmias were more often female and suffered from structural heart disease. Arrhythmia occurrence was clinically relevant regarding symptoms and patient satisfaction. Serious adverse events including stroke, transient ischemic attack, pacemaker implantation, as well as continued use of antiarrhythmic medication occurred more often in group A. A second ablation procedure was performed in 26% of symptomatic patients to optimize the symptomatic outcome, whereas cardiovascular events or patient satisfaction were not further improved. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up, one out of six patients experienced symptomatic arrhythmias after AVNRT ablation, associated with an increase of serious adverse events. A subset of patients required medical or interventional antiarrhythmic therapy, possibly attributable to the co-existence of other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmic and cardiac co-morbidity before and after ablation may support comprehensive therapy planning and outcome.

Atypical Slow-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Use of a Superior Slow Pathway.

We report a case of atypical slow-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) utilizing a superior slow pathway as a retrograde limb. The standard electrophysiological criteria confirm the diagnosis of this AVNRT by successfully excluding a diagnosis of atrial tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was found at the interatrial septum 17.5 mm superior to the site identified during retrograde conduction with the fast pathway. The tachycardia was not inducible after ablation at the right posterior septum, consistent with successful ablation of the typical slow pathway.

Multiple Shifts of the Earliest Retrograde Atrial Activation Site Along the Tricuspid Annulus During the Fast-Slow Form of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Radiofrequency Modification.

A 70-year-old woman was admitted for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Ventriculoatrial conduction was revealed through programmed ventricular stimulation; the coronary sinus ostium (CSos) was the earliest atrial activation site. The fast-slow forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were induced by ventricular extra-stimuli. During tachycardia, the earliest atrial activation site was located at the bottom of CSos. Radiofrequency (RF) energy application to this site resulted in the delay of local electrical potential, prolongation of tachycardia cycle length, and a shift of the earliest retrograde activation site to the roof of CSos. Subsequent ablation induced a similar shift to the inferior tricuspid annulus and to the right posterior septum. Finally, RF energy application to the right posterior septum resulted in the termination of tachycardia, which was not induced afterward. Multiple shifts in the earliest retrograde atrial activation site along the tricuspid annulus after each slow pathway ablation suggested that annular tissue plays a substantial role as a substrate for AVNRT.

Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Using a Slow Pathway Extending to the Superoanterior Right Atrium.

We report a case of atypical fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a slow pathway variant extending to the superoanterior right atrium. The AVNRT diagnosis was confirmed by using standard electrophysiological criteria that exclude a diagnosis of atrial tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was found in the superoanterior right atrium adjacent to the tricuspid annulus, where the first delivery of radiofrequency energy terminated and eliminated the inducibility of the tachycardia.

Increased risk of late pacemaker implantation after ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: A 10-year follow-up of a nationwide cohort.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of the slow pathway is the standard treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) with a well described low risk of periprocedural atrioventricular block. Less is known about the risk of pacemaker implantation late after ablation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the risk of late pacemaker implantation in a countrywide cohort undergoing first-time ablation for AVNRT. METHODS: All patients undergoing first-time ablation for AVNRT in Sweden from 2004 to 2014 were identified from the Swedish catheter ablation registry and matched against the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD registry. The cohort was compared to patients ablated for an accessory pathway (AP) and to matched controls. RESULTS: During follow-up of 2039 days, pacemaker was implanted later than 30 days after ablation in 96 of 6842 patients with AVNRT (1.4%), 29 of 4065 patients with AP (0.7%) (P = .001), and 124 of 33,270 controls (0.4%) (P < .00001). A periprocedural pacemaker (≤30 days postablation) was implanted in 32 of 6877 patients with AVNRT (0.5%) and 9 of 4079 patients with AP (0.2%) (P = .05). With cryoablation, 5 patients needed periprocedural pacemaker implantation. Pacemakers were implanted before ablation in 88 of 6977 patients with AVNRT (1.3%) and 11 of 4100 patients with AP (0.3%); the prevalence of pacemaker implants in controls was 124 of 33,270 (0.4%) (P < .00001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: The risk of late pacemaker implantation after AVNRT ablation was low but 3 times higher than that in the control population and 3 times higher than the risk of periprocedural pacemaker implantation. Similar results were observed with cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation. Ablation may not be the cause of increased late pacemaker implantation risk.

Clinical presentation of ventricular-Hisian and ventricular-nodal accessory pathways.

BACKGROUND: Narrow QRS tachycardia or premature beat with bystander atrial activation or ventricular-atrial dissociation is an unusual arrhythmia that can present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. When ventricular-atrial conduction is robust, these arrhythmias can be difficult to distinguish from atrioventricular nodal reentry. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the electrophysiology characteristics, diagnostic maneuvers, and treatment of these types of arrhythmias in a series of 7 cases. METHODS: Standard multipolar recording and pacing electrodes were used during electrophysiology studies. Catheter ablation was performed using radiofrequency or cryoenergy. RESULTS: During electrophysiology studies, ventricular-nodal or ventricular-Hisian conducting pathways were demonstrated to be responsible for the arrhythmias in all 7 cases. Successful ablation of these pathways using radiofrequency energy was accomplished in 6 of the 7 cases. CONCLUSION: Ventricular-Hisian and ventricular-nodal associated tachyarrhythmias should be distinguished from typical forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Catheter ablation of these pathways can be successfully accomplished using mapping techniques described in our report.

Supraventricular arrhythmia with discordant electrocardiographic features: What is the arrhythmia mechanism?

Junctional and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia share common electrocardiographic features, but they differ in their management and outcomes after catheter ablation. This case concerns a 60-year-old female who presented with recurrent episodes of a relatively slow, regular supraventricular arrhythmia. Electrocardiographic features of the arrhythmia were discordant regarding its underlying mechanism. However, careful analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms, with focus on the effect of spontaneous premature beats, pointed out the arrhythmia etiology. Electrophysiological study and pacing maneuvers defined the arrhythmic substrate that was successfully treated by catheter ablation.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and cannon A waves.

Regular, narrow complex tachycardia with a ventricular rate around 150 can be challenging. The differential includes sinus tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), and atrial tachycardia (focal or macro re-entrant - i.e. flutter). We present a case of a 90-year-old woman presenting with shortness of breath in which the ECG was not diagnostic, but the presence of regular neck pulsations helped secure the diagnosis of AVNRT. In AVNRT, atria and ventricular contractions occur nearly simultaneously. When the right atrium attempts to contract against a closed tricuspid valve, an abrupt increase in venous pressure is encountered. This increase in venous pressure manifests as prominent neck pulsations termed "cannon A waves." The patient was ultimately successfully electrically cardioverted resulting in resolution of her presenting symptoms, neck pulsations, and tachycardia. While irregular "cannon A waves" can be seen in conditions of AV dissociation, regular "cannon A waves" strongly favor the diagnosis of AVNRT.