Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy-SMART 2017-2021.

PURPOSE: The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017-2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe. METHODS: Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in select ß-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets. RESULTS: C/T inhibited the growth of 85-87% of Enterobacterales and 94-96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95-98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98-99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91-92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7-8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from people with cystic fibrosis recovered during three multicentre studies in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still a major pathogen in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We determine the activity of cefiderocol and comparators in a collection of 154 P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from pwCF during three multicentre studies performed in 17 Spanish hospitals in 2013, 2017 and 2021. METHODS: ISO broth microdilution was performed and MICs were interpreted with CLSI and EUCAST criteria. Mutation frequency and WGS were also performed. RESULTS: Overall, 21.4% were MDR, 20.8% XDR and 1.3% pandrug-resistant (PDR). Up to 17% of the isolates showed a hypermutator phenotype. Cefiderocol demonstrated excellent activity; only 13 isolates (8.4%) were cefiderocol resistant by EUCAST (none using CLSI). A high proportion of the isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam (71.4%), meropenem/vaborbactam (70.0%), imipenem/relebactam (68.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (55.6%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. Nine out of 13 cefiderocol-resistant isolates were hypermutators (P < 0.001). Eighty-three STs were detected, with ST98 being the most frequent. Only one isolate belonging to the ST175 high-risk clone carried blaVIM-2. Exclusive mutations affecting genes involved in membrane permeability, AmpC overexpression (L320P-AmpC) and efflux pump up-regulation were found in cefiderocol-resistant isolates (MIC = 4-8 mg/L). Cefiderocol resistance could also be associated with mutations in genes related to iron uptake (tonB-dependent receptors and pyochelin/pyoverdine biosynthesis). CONCLUSIONS: Our results position cefiderocol as a therapeutic option in pwCF infected with P. aeruginosa resistant to most recent ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Antimicrobial activity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against extended spectrum beta-lactamase and/or AmpC beta-lactamase- producing gram-negative bacilli.

BACKGROUND: The problem of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which is caused by ESBL and AmpC ß-lactamases, is getting worse globally. Infections caused by bacterial isolates harboring these enzymes are difficult to treat with carbapenems being the sole effective treatment option for such infections. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ESBLs and AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens and to evaluate the sensitivity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against them. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out on 100 Gram-negative bacilli at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute Hospital during the period from February 2015 to January 2016. ESBL production was screened by using the disc diffusion test followed by confirmation by the combined disc confirmatory test, the screening for AmpC production was conducted using the cefoxitin disc test, which was subsequently confirmed by the AmpC disc test. Isolates confirmed positive for ESBL and/ or AmpC production were investigated for their susceptibility to antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 100 Gram-negative bacilli, 44 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers by the combined disc confirmatory test out of 56 isolates that tested positive for ESBL production through the disc diffusion test. The presence of AmpC production was assessed using the cefoxitin disc test, 32 isolates were screened to be AmpC producers, and the AmpC disc test confirmed AmpC production in 9 isolates of them. Using the Mast® D68C set, 32 isolates were ESBL producers, 3 were AmpC producers, and 4 isolates were ESBL/AmpC co-producers. The highest sensitivity was to cefepime-tazobactam (91.48%) followed by the carbapenems. CONCLUSION: Cefepime-tazobactam showed remarkable activity against ESBL and/or AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli and may be considered as a therapeutic alternative to carbapenems.

Assessing the impact of meropenem exposure on ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistance development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using in vitro serial passage.

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa are likely to receive meropenem (MEM) empirically before escalation to ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). We assessed whether pre-exposure to MEM affected C/T resistance development on C/T exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were exposed to MEM 16 mg/L for 72 h. Then, isolates were serially passaged in the presence of C/T (concentration of 10 mg/L) for 72 h as two groups: an MEM-exposed group inoculated with MEM pre-exposed isolates and a non-MEM control group. At 24 h intervals, samples were plated on drug-free and drug-containing agar (C/T concentration 16/8 mg/L) and incubated to quantify bacterial densities (log10 cfu/mL). Growth on C/T agar indicated resistance development, and resistant population was calculated by dividing the cfu/mL on C/T plates by the cfu/mL on drug-free agar. RESULTS: At 72 h, resistant populations were detected in 6/9 isolates. In five isolates, MEM exposure significantly increased the prevalence of ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistance development; the percentages of resistance population were 100%, 100%, 53.5%, 31% and 3% for the MEM-exposed versus 0%, 0%, 2%, 0.35% and ≤0.0003% in the unexposed groups. One isolate had a similar resistant population at 72 h between the two groups. The remaining isolates showed no development of resistance, regardless of previous MEM exposure. CONCLUSIONS: MEM exposure may pre-dispose to C/T resistance development and thus limit the therapeutic utility of this ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor. Resistance may be a result of stress exposure or molecular-level mutations conferring cross-resistance. Further in vivo studies are needed to assess clinical implications of these findings.

In vitro development of resistance against antipseudomonal agents: comparison of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and other ß-lactam agents.

We subjected seven P. aeruginosa isolates to a 10-day serial passaging against five antipseudomonal agents to evaluate resistance levels post-exposure and putative resistance mechanisms in terminal mutants were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing analysis. Meropenem (mean, 38-fold increase), cefepime (14.4-fold), and piperacillin-tazobactam (52.9-fold) terminal mutants displayed high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to those obtained after exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam (11.4-fold) and ceftazidime-avibactam (5.7-fold). Fewer isolates developed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams and agents belonging to other classes when exposed to meropenem in comparison to other agents. Alterations in nalC and nalD, involved in the upregulation of the efflux pump system MexAB-OprM, were common and observed more frequently in isolates exposed to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem. These alterations, along with ones in mexR and amrR, provided resistance to most ß-lactams and levofloxacin but not imipenem. The second most common gene altered was mpl, which is involved in the recycling of the cell wall peptidoglycan. These alterations were mainly noted in isolates exposed to ceftolozane-tazobactam and piperacillin-tazobactam but also in one cefepime-exposed isolate. Alterations in other genes known to be involved in ß-lactam resistance (ftsI, oprD, phoP, pepA, and cplA) and multiple genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis were also present. The data generated here suggest that there is a difference in the mechanisms selected for high-level resistance between newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and older agents. Nevertheless, the isolates exposed to all agents displayed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams (except imipenem) and quinolones tested mainly due to alterations in the MexAB-OprM regulators that extrude these agents.

Effectiveness of novel ß-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Novel ß-lactams have in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), but their clinical performances and the selection criteria for practical use are still not clear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of novel ß-lactams for PA infection in various sites and to compare the efficacy of each agent. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that used novel ß-lactams to treat PA infection. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and favorable microbiological response. Subgroup analyses were performed based on drug type, drug resistance of pathogens, and site of infection. Network meta-analysis was carried out within a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: In all studies combined (16 randomized controlled trials), novel ß-lactams indicated comparable performance to other treatment regimens in both outcome measures (relative risk = 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.15; P = .43) (relative risk = 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.17; P = .76). Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol had no apparent differences compared to control groups among different infection sites, drug types and drug resistance of PA. In network meta-analysis, the results showed no statistically significant differences between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol. CONCLUSIONS: TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol are not inferior to other agents in the treatment of PA infection. Their efficacy is also comparable between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol.

Identifying and mathematically modeling the time-course of extracellular metabolic markers associated with resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Extracellular bacterial metabolites have potential as markers of bacterial growth and resistance emergence but have not been evaluated in dynamic in vitro studies. We investigated the dynamic metabolomic footprint of a multidrug-resistant hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate exposed to ceftolozane/tazobactam as continuous infusion (4.5 g/day, 9 g/day) in a hollow-fiber infection model over 7-9 days in biological replicates (n = 5). Bacterial samples were collected at 0, 7, 23, 47, 71, 95, 143, 167, 191, and 215 h, the supernatant quenched, and extracellular metabolites extracted. Metabolites were analyzed via untargeted metabolomics, including hierarchical clustering and correlation with quantified total and resistant bacterial populations. The time-courses of five (of 1,921 detected) metabolites from enriched pathways were mathematically modeled. Absorbed L-arginine and secreted L-ornithine were highly correlated with the total bacterial population (r -0.79 and 0.82, respectively, P<0.0001). Ribose-5-phosphate, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate, and trehalose-6-phosphate correlated with the resistant subpopulation (0.64, 0.64, and 0.67, respectively, P<0.0001) and were likely secreted due to resistant growth overcoming oxidative and osmotic stress induced by ceftolozane/tazobactam. Using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based transduction models, these metabolites were successfully modeled based on the total or resistant bacterial populations. The models well described the abundance of each metabolite across the differing time-course profiles of biological replicates, based on bacterial killing and, importantly, resistant regrowth. These proof-of-concept studies suggest that further exploration is warranted to determine the generalizability of these findings. The metabolites modeled here are not exclusive to bacteria. Future studies may use this approach to identify bacteria-specific metabolites correlating with resistance, which would ultimately be extremely useful for clinical translation.

Identification of a CTX-M-255 ß-lactamase containing a G239S substitution selectively conferring resistance to penicillin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

OBJECTIVES: An Escherichia coli isolate, WGS1363, showed resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam but susceptibility to cephalosporins and contained a previously unrecognized ß-lactamase, CTX-M-255, as the only acquired ß-lactamase. CTX-M-255 was identical to CTX-M-27 except for a G239S substitution. Here, we characterize the hydrolytic spectrum of CTX-M-255 and a previously reported ß-lactamase, CTX-M-178, also containing a G239S substitution and compare it to their respective parental enzymes, CTX-M-27 and CTX-M-15. METHODS: All ß-lactamase genes were expressed in E. coli TOP10 and MICs to representative ß-lactam-antibiotics were determined. Furthermore, blaCTX-M-15,  blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-178 and blaCTX-M-255 with C-terminal His-tag fusions were affinity purified for enzyme kinetic assays determining Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters against representative ß-lactam-antibiotics and IC50s of clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam and avibactam. RESULTS: TOP10-transformants expressing blaCTX-M-178 and blaCTX-M-255 showed resistance to penicillin/ß-lactamase combinations and susceptibility to cephalothin and cefotaxime in contrast to transformants expressing blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-27. Determination of enzyme kinetic parameters showed that CTX-M-178 and CTX-M-255 both lacked hydrolytic activity against cephalosporins and showed impaired hydrolytic efficiency against penicillin antibiotics compared to their parental enzymes. Both enzymes appeared more active against piperacillin compared to benzylpenicillin and ampicillin. Compared to their parental enzymes, IC50s of ß-lactamase-inhibitors were increased more than 1000-fold for CTX-M-178 and CTX-M-255. CONCLUSIONS: CTX-M-178 and CTX-M-255, both containing a G239S substitution, conferred resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam and may be characterized as inhibitor-resistant CTX-M ß-lactamases. Inhibitor resistance was accompanied by loss of activity against cephalosporins and monobactams. These findings add to the necessary knowledge base for predicting antibiotic susceptibility from genotypic data.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

PURPOSE: Relebactam is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor, which, when combined with imipenem/cilastatin, is active against both class A and class C ß-lactamases. To evaluate in vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem/relebactam against a collection of recent clinical isolates of carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae ST258 and ST512 KPC producers belonging to different lineages from hospitals in Southern Spain. METHODS: Six hundred and seventy-eight isolates were tested: 265 K. pneumoniae (230 ST512/KPC-3 and 35 ST258/KPC-3) and 413 carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin, and ceftazidime/avibactam were used as comparators against P. aeruginosa. Against K. pneumoniae ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam were not tested, and tigecycline was studied instead. MICs were determined in duplicate by broth microdilution according to EUCAST guidelines. RESULTS: Imipenem/relebactam displayed potent in vitro activity against both sequence types of KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae. MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively, with percent of susceptible isolates >97%. Only three K. pneumoniae ST512/KPC-3 isolates and one ST258/KPC-3 were resistant to imipenem/relebactam. Relebactam sensitized 98.5% of K. pneumoniae isolates resistant to imipenem. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa was moderate (susceptibility rate: 62.7%). Analysis of the acquired and mutational resistome of isolates with high levels of resistance to imipenem/relebactam has not shown a clear association between them. CONCLUSION: Imipenem/relebactam showed excellent activity against K. pneumoniae KPC-3. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa was moderate.

Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit patients infected with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria treated with ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam.

In intensive care units (ICUs), infection rates range from 18 to 54%, which is five to ten times higher than those observed in other hospital units, with a mortality rate of 9% to 60%. In recent decades, the susceptibility pattern has changed and Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) have become a threat due to their high frequency of multidrug resistance associated with a scarcity of therapeutic options. However, the drugs Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) and Ceftazidime/Avibactam (C/A) are demonstrating good clinical and microbiological response in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with severe infections caused by Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) GNB treated with C/T and C/A. Our study evaluates a total of 131 patients who received treatment with C/T and C/A due to infections caused by MDR GNB within the period from 2018 to 2021. The main infections were urinary tract (46,6%) and respiratory (26,7%) infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the prevailing agent in the sample evaluation (34.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (30,1%). About 54,9% of patients showed a favorable response, with culture negativation in 66,4% of the samples, with no discrepancy in negativations when comparing ages: 67,7% in young and 66% in elderly patients. Among the patients, 62,6% received monotherapy with C/T and C/A with a better response observed with monotherapy compared to combination therapy (58,6% vs 41,4%). The overall mortality rate was 45%, with MDR GNB infections responsible for 33,9% of these deaths, and the others (66,1%) due to factors such as oncological, hematological, and degenerative neurological diseases. In regards to hematological aspect, 35,1% of patients showed changes, with 28,2% of them presenting anemia, 4,5% thrombocytopenia, and 2,5% thrombocytosis. Concerning the use of invasive devices, higher mortality was observed in patients on mechanical ventilation (52%). In this manner, it was possible to observe that therapy with C/T and C/A yielded a favorable clinical outcome in patients with severe infections caused by MDR GNB in the study. These drugs also demonstrated good tolerability regardless of age or the presence of preexisting comorbidities and were deemed safe when assessing adverse effects. Our data also demonstrate the importance of determining the mechanism of resistance to carbapenems so that these drugs can be used more effectively and rationally.

Evaluation of three commercial methods of susceptibility testing for ceftolozane/tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Evaluación de 3 métodos comerciales de determinación de sensibilidad de ceftolozano/tazobactam frente a Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistente a las carbapenemas

Introduction: Ceftolozane/tazobactam has shown excellent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but this drug is not always included in commercial panels. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 gradient strips (BioMérieux and Liofilchem) and a commercial microdilution panel (Sensititre, EURGNCOL panel) using this combination against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Methods: Three commercial methods were tested with 41 metallo-beta-lactamase-producing and 59 non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Broth microdilution was used as reference. Results: All carbapenemase-producing isolates and only one non-producing isolate were resistant to this antibiotic. Both essential agreement and bias were outside the acceptance intervals since MIC values were higher than reference values for all three methods. The Kappa index indicated poor or weak agreement. Changes in clinical categories were observed in 3 isolates. Conclusions: The three methods yielded poor agreement with the reference. Despite the differences in MIC values, fewer than 3% involved category changes.(AU)

Introducción: La combinación ceftolozano/tazobactam ha mostrado una actividad excelente frente a Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pero este fármaco no siempre se incluye en los paneles comerciales. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el rendimiento de 2 tiras de gradiente (BioMérieux® y Liofilchem®) y un panel de microdilución comercial (Sensititre®, panel EURGNCOL) utilizando esta combinación frente a aislados de P. aeruginosa resistente a los carbapenémicos. Métodos: Se probaron 3 métodos comerciales con 41 aislados productores de metalobetalactamasas y 59 aislados no productores de carbapenemasas de P. aeruginosa. La microdilución de caldo se utilizó como referencia. Resultados: Todos los aislados productores de carbapenemasas y solo un aislado no productor fueron resistentes a este antibiótico. Tanto la concordancia esencial como el sesgo se encontraron fuera de los intervalos de aceptación, dado que los valores CMI eran superiores que los valores de referencia para los 3 métodos. El índice de Kappa indicó una concordancia pobre o débil. Se observaron cambios en las categorías clínicas en 3 aislados. Conclusiones: Los 3 métodos presentaron una baja concordancia con la microdilución de referencia. A pesar de las diferencias en los valores MIC, menos del 3% implicaron cambios de categoría.(AU)

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against recent clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil - the EM200 study

ABSTRACT Background: The emergence of antibiotic resistance is increasing and there are few effective antibiotics to treat infections caused by resistant and multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil. Methods: A total of 673 Gram-negative bacterial isolates including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Enterobacterales collected from 2016 to 2017 were tested, most of them isolated from patients in intensive care units. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC50/90) were determined by broth microdilution for amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam using dried panels. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria. Results: Susceptibility rates to ceftolozane-tazobactam ranged from 40.4% to 94.9%. P. aeruginosa susceptibility rate to ceftolozane-tazobactam was 84.9% (MIC50/90, 1/16 µg/mL) and 99.2% to colistin. For E. coli, ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 94.9% (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 µg/mL) of the microorganisms. The susceptibility rate of K. pneumoniae to ceftolozane-tazobactam was 40.4% (MIC50/90, 16/>32 µg/mL). Other Enterobacterales have shown susceptibility rates of 81.1% (MIC50/90, 0.5/16 µg/mL) to ceftolozane-tazobactam, 93.9% to meropenem, 90.9% to amikacin (90.9%), and 88.6% to ertapenem. In non-carbapenemase producing isolates, AmpC mutations were found three isolates. Conclusions: Ceftolozane-tazobactam has shown relevant activity against a large variety of the analyzed microorganisms collected from multiple centers in Brazil, showing promising results even in multidrug resistant strains.

Evaluación de la sensibilidad de cepas de Pseudomonas aeruginosa multi-resistentes frente a ceftolozano/tazobactam / Evaluation of susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains against ceftolozane/tazobactam

Resumen Introducción: Pseudomonas aeruginosa es un patógeno oportunista asociado a alta morbi-mortalidad. Para cepas multi-resistentes (MDR), ceftolozano/tazobactam (CTZ) se ha autorizado por la Agencia Europea del Medicamento (EMA) para infecciones del tracto urinario complicadas, pielonefritis aguda e infecciones intra-abdominales complicadas. Objetivo: Determinar la sensibilidad a CTZ de P. aeruginosa MDR en muestras clínicas aisladas en el Hospital Universitario Puerto Real. Material y Métodos: Se estudió la sensibilidad según criterios EUCAST a CTZ de cepas de P. aeruginosa MDR, entre enero de 2015 y agosto de 2017. Los criterios de multi-resistencia fueron definidos por el Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. La sensibilidad antimicrobiana se obtuvo mediante sistema MicroScan® (Beckman Coulter). La sensibilidad a CTZ se determinó mediante tiras de gradiente (Liofilchem®, Werfen). Resultados: De 1253 cepas, 7% fueron MDR. Se estudió la sensibilidad de 78 cepas de P. aeruginosa MDR, de las cuales cinco (6,4%) resultaron resistentes a CTZ según criterios EUCAST. Conclusiones: En nuestro medio la resistencia in vitro a CTZ en cepas de P. aeruginosa MDR es aproximadamente 6%; CTZ es una opción de tratamiento de infecciones por cepas de P. aeruginosa MDR cuando no exista otra alternativa y se haya comprobado su sensibilidad in vitro.

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen associated with high morbidity and mortality. For multidrug-resistant strains (MDR), ceftolozane/tazobactam (CTZ) has been authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for complicated urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, and complicated intraabdominal infections. Aim: To determine the susceptibility to CTZ of P. aeruginosa MDR in isolated clinical samples at the University Hospital Puerto Real. Methods: The susceptibility according to the EUCAST to CTZ criteria of strains of P. aeruginosa MDR, between January 2015 and August 2017 has been studied. The multiresistance criteria were those defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The antibiotic susceptibility was obtained by automated MicroScan® system (Beckman Coulter). Susceptibility to CTZ was determined using gradient strips (Liofilchem®, Werfen). Results: Of 1253 strains isolated, 7% presented MDR. We studied the susceptibility of a total of 78 strains of MDR P. aeruginosa, of which 5 (6.4%) were resistant to CTZ according to the EUCAST criteria. Conclusions: In our environment, the in vitro resistance to CTZ in MDR P. aeruginosa strains is approximately 6%. CTZ is an option for the treatment of infections by MDR P. aeruginosa when there is no other alternative and its in-vitro susceptibility has been proven.

Nuevas cefalosporinas / New cephalosporins

Resumen La resistencia bacteriana se ha incrementado en América Latina y el mundo, por lo que se requiere investigación y creación de nuevos antimicrobianos capaces de erradicar a los microorganismos resistentes. Se realizó una revisión acerca de nuevas cefalosporinas y sus combinaciones con un inhibidor de β-lactamasas, recopilando información de espectro, farmacocinética, farmacodinamia y estudios clínicos de las indicaciones actuales para ceftarolina, ceftazidima/avibactam y ceftolozano/tazobactam. La primera, con actividad frente a Staphylococcus aureus y Staphylococcus coagulasa negativa sensibles y resistentes a meticilina, y contra Streptococcus pneumoniae resistente a penicilina; por lo tanto, aprobada para uso en neumonía bacteriana adquirida en comunidad e infecciones bacterianas de piel y tejidos blandos. Entre las nuevas combinaciones, ceftazidima, una cefalosporina de tercera generación con actividad anti-pseudomonas, asociada a avibactam, un inhibidor de β-lactamasas, ha demostrado efectividad en el tratamiento de infecciones abdominales e infecciones urinarias complicadas. Por último, la combinación ceftolozano y el conocido tazobactam presenta acción comparable a la combinación de ceftazidima y avibactam por su actividad contra bacilos gramnegativos y, en combinación con metronidazol no presenta inferioridad a meropenem en infecciones intra-abdominales. Se presentan los estudios clínicos y las potenciales indicaciones y escenarios de uso de estas cefalosporinas.

Bacterial resistance has increased in Latin America and the world, making research and creation of new antimicrobials capable of eradicating resistant microorganisms essential. A review of new cephalosporins and their combinations with a beta-lactamase inhibitor was conducted, collecting data on the spectrum, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and clinical studies of the current indications for ceftaroline, and the combinations ceftazidime with avibactam and ceftolozane with tazobactam. The first one has activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus (SCoN) and against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, therefore approved for use in community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Among the new combinations, ceftazidime, a third generation cephalosporin with antipseudomonal activity, associated with avibactam, a betalactamase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of abdominal infections and complicated urinary infections. Finally, the combination of ceftolozane with tazobactam has comparable action to ceftazidime with avibactam due to its activity against Gram negative rods, and in combination with metronidazole they do not present inferiority to meropenem in intra-abdominal infections. The clinical studies are presented, as well as the potential indications and clinical scenarios for their use of this cephalosporins.