Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.020
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e084447, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692730

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine, a method of healthcare service delivery bridging geographic distances between patients and providers, has gained prominence. This modality is particularly advantageous for outpatient consultations, addressing inherent barriers of travel time and cost. OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe economical outcomes towards the implementation of a multidisciplinary telemedicine service in a high-complexity hospital in Latin America, from the perspective of patients. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted, analysing the institutional data obtained over a period of 9 months, between April 2020 and December 2020. SETTING: A high-complexity teaching hospital located in Cali, Colombia. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals who received care via telemedicine. The population was categorised into three groups based on their place of residence: Cali, Valle del Cauca excluding Cali and Outside of Valle del Cauca. OUTCOME MEASURES: Travel distance, time, fuel and public round-trip cost savings, and potential loss of productivity were estimated from the patient's perspective. RESULTS: A total of 62 258 teleconsultations were analysed. Telemedicine led to a total distance savings of 4 514 903 km, and 132 886 hours. The estimated cost savings were US$680 822 for private transportation and US$1 087 821 for public transportation. Patients in the Outside of Valle del Cauca group experienced an estimated average time savings of 21.2 hours, translating to an average fuel savings of US$149.02 or an average savings of US$156.62 in public transportation costs. Areas with exclusive air access achieved a mean cost savings of US$362.9 per teleconsultation, specifically related to transportation costs. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine emerges as a powerful tool for achieving substantial travel savings for patients, especially in regions confronting geographical and socioeconomic obstacles. These findings underscore the potential of telemedicine to bridge healthcare accessibility gaps in low-income and middle-income countries, calling for further investment and expansion of telemedicine services in such areas.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino , Telemedicina , Humanos , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Redução de Custos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Viagem/economia
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2411006, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739388

RESUMO

Importance: Understanding the association of telehealth use with health care outcomes is fundamental to determining whether telehealth waivers implemented during the COVID-19 public health emergency should be made permanent. The current literature has yielded inconclusive findings owing to its focus on select states, practices, or health care systems. Objective: To estimate the association of telehealth use with outcomes for all Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries by comparing hospital service areas (HSAs) with different levels of telehealth use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This US population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to April 2023. Participants included Medicare claims of beneficiaries attributed to HSAs with FFS enrollment in Parts A and B. Exposures: Low, medium, or high tercile of telehealth use created by ranking HSAs according to the number of telehealth visits per 1000 beneficiaries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were quality (ambulatory care-sensitive [ACS] hospitalizations and emergency department [ED] visits per 1000 FFS beneficiaries), access to care (clinician encounters per FFS beneficiary), and cost (total cost of care for Part A and/or B services per FFS Medicare beneficiary) determined with a difference-in-difference analysis. Results: In this cohort study of claims from approximately 30 million Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age in 2019, 71.04 [1.67] years; mean [SD] percentage female in 2019, 53.83% [2.14%]) within 3436 HSAs, between the second half of 2019 and the second half of 2021, mean ACS hospitalizations and ED visits declined sharply, mean clinician encounters per beneficiary declined slightly, and mean total cost of care per beneficiary per semester increased slightly. Compared with the low group, the high group had more ACS hospitalizations (1.63 additional hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries; 95% CI, 1.03-2.22 hospitalizations), more clinician encounters (0.30 additional encounters per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, 0.23-0.38 encounters), and higher total cost of care ($164.99 higher cost per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, $101.03-$228.96). There was no statistically significant difference in ACS ED visits between the low and high groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries across all 3436 HSAs, high levels of telehealth use were associated with more clinician encounters, more ACS hospitalizations, and higher total health care costs. COVID-19 cases were still high during the period of study, which suggests that these findings partially reflect a higher capacity for providing health services in HSAs with higher telehealth intensity than other HSAs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicare , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673320

RESUMO

Teledentistry offers possibilities for improving efficiency and quality of care and supporting cost-effective healthcare systems. This umbrella review aims to synthesize existing systematic reviews on teledentistry and provide a summary of evidence of its clinical- and cost-effectiveness. A comprehensive search strategy involving various teledentistry-related terms, across seven databases, was conducted. Articles published until 24 April 2023 were considered. Two researchers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full-text articles. The quality of the included reviews was critically appraised with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. Out of 749 studies identified, 10 were included in this umbrella review. Two reviews focusing on oral-health outcomes revealed that, despite positive findings, there is not yet enough evidence for the long-term clinical effectiveness of teledentistry. Ten reviews reported on economic evaluations or costs, indicating that teledentistry is cost-saving. However, these conclusions were based on assumptions due to insufficient evidence on cost-effectiveness. The main limitation of our umbrella review was the critically low quality of the included reviews according to AMSTAR-2 criteria, with many of these reviews basing their conclusions on low-quality studies. This highlights the need for high-quality experimental studies (e.g., RCTs, factorial designs, stepped-wedge designs, SMARTs and MRTs) to assess teledentistry's clinical- and cost-effectiveness.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Saúde Bucal , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos , Saúde Bucal/economia , Odontologia/métodos
4.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(5): 691-700, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630943

RESUMO

Telemedicine use remains substantially higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic, although it has fallen from pandemic highs. To inform the ongoing debate about whether to continue payment for telemedicine visits, we estimated the association of greater telemedicine use across health systems with utilization, spending, and quality. In 2020, Medicare patients receiving care at health systems in the highest quartile of telemedicine use had 2.5 telemedicine visits per person (26.8 percent of visits) compared with 0.7 telemedicine visits per person (9.5 percent of visits) in the lowest quartile of telemedicine use. In 2021-22, relative to those in the lowest quartile, Medicare patients of health systems in the highest quartile had an increase of 0.21 total outpatient visits (telemedicine and in-person) per patient per year (2.2 percent relative increase), a decrease of 14.4 annual non-COVID-19 emergency department visits per 1,000 patients per year (2.7 percent relative decrease), a $248 increase in per patient per year spending (1.6 percent relative increase), and increased adherence for metformin and statins. There were no clear differential changes in hospitalizations or receipt of preventive care.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Gastos em Saúde , Medicare , Telemedicina , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/economia , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Pandemias , Idoso , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e53500, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promising results in enhancing the management of heart failure (HF). Although health care interventions are increasingly being delivered digitally, with growing evidence on the potential cost-effectiveness of adopting them, there has been little effort to collate and synthesize the findings. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to systematically review the economic evaluations that assess the adoption of DHIs in the management and treatment of HF. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 3 electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. Articles reporting full economic evaluations of DHIs for patients with HF published up to July 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Study characteristics, design (both trial based and model based), input parameters, and main results were extracted from full-text articles. Data synthesis was conducted based on the technologies used for delivering DHIs in the management of patients with HF, and the findings were analyzed narratively. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this systematic review. The reporting quality of the included studies was evaluated using the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 27 economic evaluations were included in the review. The economic evaluations were based on models (13/27, 48%), trials (13/27, 48%), or a combination approach (1/27, 4%). The devices evaluated included noninvasive remote monitoring devices (eg, home telemonitoring using digital tablets or specific medical devices that enable transmission of physiological data), telephone support, mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems. Most of the studies (24/27, 89%) used cost-utility analysis. The majority of the studies (25/27, 93%) were conducted in high-income countries, particularly European countries (16/27, 59%) such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems yielded cost-effective results or even emerged as dominant strategies. However, conflicting results were observed, particularly in noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support. In 15% (4/27) of the studies, these DHIs were found to be less costly and more effective than the comparators (ie, dominant), while 33% (9/27) reported them to be more costly but more effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below the respective willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, cost-effective). Furthermore, in 11% (3/27) of the studies, noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support were either above the willingness-to-pay thresholds or more costly than, yet as effective as, the comparators (ie, not cost-effective). In terms of reporting quality, the studies were classified as good (20/27, 74%), moderate (6/27, 22%), or excellent (1/27, 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the conflicting results, the main findings indicated that, overall, DHIs were more cost-effective than non-DHI alternatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023388241; https://tinyurl.com/2p9axpmc.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Telemedicina , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos , Saúde Digital
6.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3650, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688925

RESUMO

Utilization of digital technologies for cataract screening in primary care is a potential solution for addressing the dilemma between the growing aging population and unequally distributed resources. Here, we propose a digital technology-driven hierarchical screening (DH screening) pattern implemented in China to promote the equity and accessibility of healthcare. It consists of home-based mobile artificial intelligence (AI) screening, community-based AI diagnosis, and referral to hospitals. We utilize decision-analytic Markov models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different cataract screening strategies (no screening, telescreening, AI screening and DH screening). A simulated cohort of 100,000 individuals from age 50 is built through a total of 30 1-year Markov cycles. The primary outcomes are incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio. The results show that DH screening dominates no screening, telescreening and AI screening in urban and rural China. Annual DH screening emerges as the most economically effective strategy with 341 (338 to 344) and 1326 (1312 to 1340) years of blindness avoided compared with telescreening, and 37 (35 to 39) and 140 (131 to 148) years compared with AI screening in urban and rural settings, respectively. The findings remain robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted. Here, we report that DH screening is cost-effective in urban and rural China, and the annual screening proves to be the most cost-effective option, providing an economic rationale for policymakers promoting public eye health in low- and middle-income countries.


Assuntos
Catarata , Análise Custo-Benefício , Programas de Rastreamento , Humanos , China/epidemiologia , Catarata/economia , Catarata/diagnóstico , Catarata/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Masculino , Tecnologia Digital/economia , Feminino , Cadeias de Markov , Idoso , Inteligência Artificial , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos
7.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1266-1270, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One third of South African children live in households with no employed adult. Telemedicine may save patients and the strained public health sector significant resources. We aimed to determine the safety and benefits of telephonic post-operative follow-up of patients who presented for day case surgery at CHBAH from 1 January-31 March 2023. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study on patients undergoing day case surgery was performed. Healthy patients greater than 6 years old whose caregivers spoke English and had access to a smartphone were included. Data on the total number of telephonic follow-ups, operative complications, need for in person review, satisfaction with telephonic follow-up, and savings in transport costs and time by avoiding in person follow-up were collected. RESULTS: A total of 38 telephonic follow-ups were performed. Six (15.8%) patients presented for in person review due to the detection of major complications (2, 5.3%), minor complications (2, 5.3%), and parental concern (2, 5.3%) during telephonic follow-up. All caregivers reported being satisfied with telephonic follow-up. Total savings in transport costs were R4452 (US $ 248.45). The majority of patients (29, 76.3%) had at least one unemployed parent. Seven caregivers (18.4%) avoided taking paid leave and 2 (5.3%) unpaid leave from work due to follow-up being performed telephonically. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation is necessary in order to expand access to safe, affordable, and timely care. In this selected group, telephonic follow-up was a safe, acceptable, and cost-effective intervention. The expansion of such a program has the potential for significant savings for patients and the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Telemedicina , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , África do Sul , Telemedicina/economia , Telefone , Seguimentos , Adolescente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos
8.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e53437, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536065

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Digital health and telemedicine are potentially important strategies to decrease health care's environmental impact and contribution to climate change by reducing transportation-related air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. However, we currently lack robust national estimates of emissions savings attributable to telemedicine. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine the travel distance between participants in US telemedicine sessions and (2) estimate the net reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions attributable to telemedicine in the United States, based on national observational data describing the geographical characteristics of telemedicine session participants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of telemedicine sessions in the United States between January 1, 2022, and February 21, 2023, on the doxy.me platform. Using Google Distance Matrix, we determined the median travel distance between participating providers and patients for a proportional sample of sessions. Further, based on the best available public data, we estimated the total annual emissions costs and savings attributable to telemedicine in the United States. RESULTS: The median round trip travel distance between patients and providers was 49 (IQR 21-145) miles. The median CO2 emissions savings per telemedicine session was 20 (IQR 8-59) kg CO2). Accounting for the energy costs of telemedicine and US transportation patterns, among other factors, we estimate that the use of telemedicine in the United States during the years 2021-2022 resulted in approximate annual CO2 emissions savings of 1,443,800 metric tons. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates of travel distance and telemedicine-associated CO2 emissions costs and savings, based on national data, indicate that telemedicine may be an important strategy in reducing the health care sector's carbon footprint.


Assuntos
Telemedicina , Viagem , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/economia , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Poluição do Ar , Pegada de Carbono/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 161: 209314, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between copayments and healthcare utilization and expenditures among Medicaid enrollees with substance use disorders. METHODS: This study used claims data (2020-2021) from a private insurer participating in Arkansas's Medicaid expansion. We compared service utilization and expenditures for enrollees in different Medicaid program structures with varying copayments. Enrollees with incomes above 100 % FPL (N = 10,240) had copayments for substance use treatment services while enrollees below 100 % FPL (N = 2478) did not. Demographic, diagnostic, utilization, and cost information came from claims and enrollment information. The study identified substance use and clinical comorbidities using claims from July through December 2020 and evaluated utilization and costs in 2021. Generalized linear models (GLM) estimated outcomes using single equation and two-part modeling. A gamma distribution and log link were used to model expenditures, and negative binomial models were used to model utilization. A falsification test comparing behavioral health telemedicine utilization, which had no cost sharing in either group, assessed whether differences in the groups may be responsible for observed findings. RESULTS: Substance use enrollees with copayments were less likely to have a substance use or behavioral health outpatient (-0.04 PP adjusted; p = 0.001) or inpatient visit (-0.04 PP; p = 0.001) relative to their counterparts without copayments, equal to a 17 % reduction in substance use or behavioral health outpatient services and a nearly 50 % reduction in inpatient visits. The reduced utilization among enrollees with a copayment was associated with a significant reduction in total expenses ($954; p = 0.001) and expenses related to substance use or behavioral health services ($532; p = 0.001). For enrollees with at least one behavioral health visit, there were no differences in outpatient or inpatient utilization or expenditures between enrollees with and without copayments. Copayments had no association with non-behavioral health or telemedicine services where neither group had cost sharing. CONCLUSION: Copayments serve as an initial barrier to substance use treatment, but are not associated with the amount of healthcare utilization conditional on using services. Policy makers and insurers should consider the role of copayments for treatment services among enrollees with substance use disorders in Medicaid programs.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde , Medicaid , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Arkansas , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Adulto Jovem , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/economia , Adolescente , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(5): 1262-1271, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241486

RESUMO

Background: Little is known about the trends and costs of hypertension management through telehealth among individuals enrolled in Medicaid. Methods: Using MarketScan® Medicaid database, we examined outpatient visits among people with hypertension aged 18-64 years. We presented the numbers of hypertension-related telehealth and in-person outpatient visits per 100 individuals and the proportion of hypertension-related telehealth outpatient visits to total outpatient visits by month, overall, and by race and ethnicity. For the cost analysis, we presented total and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs per visit for telehealth and in-person visits in 2021. Results: Of the 229,562 individuals, 114,445 (49.9%) were non-Hispanic White, 80,692 (35.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, 3,924 (1.71%) were Hispanic. From February to April 2020, the number of hypertension-related telehealth outpatient visits per 100 persons increased from 0.01 to 6.13, the number of hypertension-related in-person visits decreased from 61.88 to 52.63, and the proportion of hypertension-related telehealth outpatient visits increased from 0.01% to 10.44%. During that same time, the proportion increased from 0.02% to 13.9% for non-Hispanic White adults, from 0.00% to 7.58% for non-Hispanic Black adults, and from 0.12% to 19.82% for Hispanic adults. The average total and patient OOP costs per visit in 2021 were $83.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.66-85.05) and $0.55 (95% CI, 0.42-0.68) for telehealth and $264.48 (95% CI, 258.87-269.51) and $0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.79) for in-person visits, respectively. Conclusions: Hypertension management via telehealth increased among Medicaid recipients regardless of race and ethnicity, during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings may inform telehealth policymakers and health care practitioners.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Medicaid , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/economia , Hipertensão/etnologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(5): 1317-1324, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109228

RESUMO

Background: Central airway diseases requiring frequent outpatient visits to a specialized medical center due to tracheal devices. Many of these patients have mobility and cognition restrictions or require specialized transport due to the need for supplemental oxygen. This study describes the implementation and results of a telemedicine program dedicated to patients with central airway diseases based in a Brazilian public health system. Methods: A retrospective study of telemedicine consultation for patients with central airway diseases referred to a public academic hospital between August 1, 2020 and August 1, 2022. The consultations occurred in a telemedicine department using the hospital's proprietary platform. Data retrieved consisted of demographics, disease characteristics, and the treatment modalities of the patients. The analysis included the savings in kilometers not traveled, the carbon footprint based on reducing CO2 emissions, and the cost savings in transportation. Results: A total of 1,153 telemedicine visits conducted in 516 patients (median age of 31.5 years). Two hundred ninety patients (56.2%) had a tracheal device (129 silicone T-Tube, 128 tracheostomy, and 33 endoprosthesis) and 159 patients (30.8%) had difficulties in transportation to the specialized medical center. Patients were served from 147 Brazilian cities from 22 states. The savings in kilometers traveled was 1,224,108.54 km, corresponding to a 250.14 ton reduction in CO2 emissions. The costs savings in transportation for the municipalities was BRL$ 1,272,283.78. Conclusions: Telemedicine consultations for patients with central airway diseases are feasible and safe. Cost savings and the possibility of disseminating specialized care make telemedicine a fundamental tool in current medical practice.


Assuntos
Telemedicina , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Brasil , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Telemedicina/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Doenças da Traqueia/terapia , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar
13.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(5): 1411-1417, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150704

RESUMO

Introduction: Teledermatology adoption continues to increase, in part, spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzes the utility and cost savings of a store-and-forward teledermatology consultative system within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: Retrospective cohort of 4,493 patients across 14 remote sites in Tennessee and Kentucky from May 2017 through August 2019. The study measured the agreement between the teledermatology diagnoses and follow-up face-to-face clinic evaluations as well as the cost effectiveness of the teledermatology program over the study period. Results: Fifty-four percent of patients were recommended for face-to-face appointment for biopsy or further evaluation. Most patients, 80.5% received their face-to-face care by a VA dermatologist. There was a high level of concordance between teledermatologist and clinic dermatologist for pre-malignant and malignant cutaneous conditions. Veterans were seen faster at a VA clinic compared with a community dermatology site. Image quality improved as photographers incorporated teledermatologist feedback. From a cost perspective, teledermatology saved the VA system $1,076,000 in community care costs. Discussion: Teledermatology is a useful diagnostic tool within the VA system providing Veteran care at a cost savings.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Redução de Custos , Dermatologia , Dermatopatias , Telemedicina , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Dermatologia/economia , Dermatologia/normas , Dermatologia/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/economia , Estados Unidos , Telemedicina/economia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Feminino , Kentucky , Masculino , Controle de Qualidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tennessee , SARS-CoV-2 , Consulta Remota/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício
16.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 29(6): 887-892, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515392

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Video visits became more widely available during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the ongoing role and value of video visits in care delivery and how these may have changed over time are not well understood. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Compare the relative complexity of in-person versus video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic and describe the complexity of video visits over time. METHODS: We used billing data for in-person and video revisits from non-behavioural health specialities with the most video visit utilisation (≥50th percentile) at a large, urban, public healthcare system from 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2022. We used current procedural terminology (CPT) codes as a proxy for information gathering and decision-making complexity and time spent on an encounter. We compared the distribution of CPT codes 99211-99215 between in-person and video visits using Fisher's exact tests. We used Spearman correlation to test for trends between proportions of CPT codes over time for video visits. RESULTS: Ten specialities (adult primary care, paediatrics, adult dermatology, bariatric surgery, paediatric endocrinology, obstetrics and gynaecologist, adult haematology/oncology, paediatric allergy/immunology, paediatric gastroenterology, and paediatric pulmonology) met inclusion criteria. For each speciality, proportions of each CPT code for in-person visits and for video visits varied significantly, and patterns of variation differed by speciality. For example, in adult primary care, video visits had smaller proportions of moderate/high complexity visits (99214 and 99215) and greater proportions of lower complexity visits (99211-99213) compared with in-person visits (p < 0.001), but in paediatric endocrinology, the opposite was seen (p < 0.001). Trends in CPT codes over time for video visits in each speciality were also mixed. CONCLUSION: In-person and video visits had differing proportions of complexity codes (typically skewing towards lower complexity for video visits). The complexity of video visits changed over time in many specialities. Observed patterns for both phenomena varied by speciality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Pandemias , Telemedicina , Telemedicina/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Current Procedural Terminology , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , Atenção à Saúde/economia
19.
BMJ Open ; 12(7): e056605, 2022 07 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790332

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Every year 2.4 million deaths occur worldwide in babies younger than 28 days. Approximately 70% of these deaths occur in low-resource settings because of failure to implement evidence-based interventions. Digital health technologies may offer an implementation solution. Since 2014, we have worked in Bangladesh, Malawi, Zimbabwe and the UK to develop and pilot Neotree: an android app with accompanying data visualisation, linkage and export. Its low-cost hardware and state-of-the-art software are used to improve bedside postnatal care and to provide insights into population health trends, to impact wider policy and practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a mixed methods (1) intervention codevelopment and optimisation and (2) pilot implementation evaluation (including economic evaluation) study. Neotree will be implemented in two hospitals in Zimbabwe, and one in Malawi. Over the 2-year study period clinical and demographic newborn data will be collected via Neotree, in addition to behavioural science informed qualitative and quantitative implementation evaluation and measures of cost, newborn care quality and usability. Neotree clinical decision support algorithms will be optimised according to best available evidence and clinical validation studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a Wellcome Trust funded project (215742_Z_19_Z). Research ethics approvals have been obtained: Malawi College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (P.01/20/2909; P.02/19/2613); UCL (17123/001, 6681/001, 5019/004); Medical Research Council Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A/2570), BRTI and JREC institutional review boards (AP155/2020; JREC/327/19), Sally Mugabe Hospital Ethics Committee (071119/64; 250418/48). Results will be disseminated via academic publications and public and policy engagement activities. In this study, the care for an estimated 15 000 babies across three sites will be impacted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0512707; Pre-results.


Assuntos
Saúde do Lactente , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Melhoria de Qualidade , Telemedicina , Algoritmos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Saúde do Lactente/economia , Saúde do Lactente/normas , Recém-Nascido , Malaui , Aplicativos Móveis , Projetos Piloto , Cuidado Pós-Natal/economia , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/normas , Pobreza , Desenvolvimento de Programas/economia , Desenvolvimento de Programas/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas , Zimbábue
20.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 294: 951-952, 2022 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35612254

RESUMO

Telemedicine can be useful for diabetes patients living remotely, especially during pandemic times. We aimed to identify current knowledge of the use of telemedicine for diabetes in Norway by conducting a review of the literature. Telemedicine is mostly beneficial, and it seems that it can be adopted into the usual diabetes care in Norway as a low-cost alternative.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Telemedicina , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Telemedicina/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...