Comparison of Outcomes Following Neuronavigation-Assisted Aspiration and Thrombolysis Using Single and Multiple Catheter Insertion for Moderate-Volume Supratentorial Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 102 Patients.

BACKGROUND This retrospective study from a single center aimed to investigate 102 patients with isolated moderate-volume (30-60 mL) supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) treated with neuronavigation-assisted aspiration and thrombolysis to compare outcomes using single and multiple catheter insertion. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 102 patients (58 single-catheter insertion recipients and 44 multi-catheter insertion recipients) diagnosed with isolated moderate-volume supratentorial sICH who underwent neuronavigation-assisted aspiration and thrombolysis surgery in a single center between March 2017 and December 2019. The impact of multi-catheter insertion on the radiologic and clinical outcomes and complications were compared with those of single-catheter insertion. RESULTS The baseline characteristics, clinical status, and outcomes of both groups were not significantly different, except for the number of inserted catheters and surgical time. The single-catheter group had a significantly shorter surgical time than the multi-catheter group (39.52±8.76 min vs 61.39±16.6 min; P<0.001). The surgery-related complication catheter tract hemorrhage (CTH) occurred significantly more frequently in the multi-catheter group than in the single-catheter group (8.6% vs 27.3%; P=0.019). In the regression analysis, international normalized ratio prolongation and multi-catheter insertion were independent risk factors for CTH. CONCLUSIONS Single-catheter insertion is not inferior to multi-catheter insertion for isolated moderate-volume (30-60 mL) supratentorial sICH in terms of radiologic and clinical outcomes and significantly shortened the surgical time and reduced the incidence of CTH.

Anatomical consideration of deep calf veins: application to catheter-directed thrombolysis.

PURPOSE: An antegrade approach is frequently used in catheter-directed thrombolysis to remove deep-vein thrombosis. However, the antegrade approach is difficult when accessing veins with small diameters; therefore, understanding the variation of deep calf vein is important. METHODS: This study measured the diameters and surface areas of the proximal and distal posterior tibial vein, peroneal vein, and anterior tibial vein to determine which are preferable for venous access. This study dissected 132 legs from Korean and Thai cadavers. The proximal and distal posterior tibial vein, peroneal vein, and anterior tibial vein were scanned and measured. RESULTS: The mean diameter and surface area were largest for the proximal tibial vein, at 6.34 mm and 0.312 cm2, respectively, followed by the anterior tibial vein (5.22 mm and 0.213 cm2), distal posterior tibial vein (3.29 mm and 0.091 cm2), and peroneal vein (3.43 mm and 0.081 cm2). The proximal posterior tibial vein and anterior tibial vein have large diameters and surface areas, which make them ideal for applying an antegrade approach in catheter-directed thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The distal posterior tibial vein and peroneal vein are not recommended due to their smaller surface areas and also the anatomical variations therein.

Efficacy of modified pressure cuff for thrombolytic treatment on lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness and patient comfort between two methods that block superficial venous blood flow during the thrombolytic treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) to provide evidence that informs clinical choice.One hundred twenty patients with lower extremity DVT were randomly divided into sphygmomanometer (group A, n = 40), tourniquet (group B, n = 40), and control group (no blocking, n = 40). All the patients were treated with a daily dosage of urokinase using a dial sphygmomanometer cuff and tourniquet to block lower extremity superficial vein blood flow. The pressure of the dial sphygmomanometer blocking lower extremity superficial vein blood flow was measured during lower extremity venography. Leg swelling reduction rate, venous patency, thrombus removal rate, and average comfort index were observed during the blocking process.The average pressure value for group A was 70  ±â€Š10 mm Hg. The differences in the swelling reduction rate and venous patency were significant between the groups. Comparing the two groups at different time points, the average thrombus clearance rate of group A was higher than that of group B and control group. The leg pain scores of group A were lower than those of group B and control group. The postoperative comfort ratio of group A was higher than that of group B, and the proportion of severe discomfort in group A was lower than that in group B.Compared with the tourniquet, using a dial sphygmomanometer cuff to block lower extremity superficial vein blood flow achieved a better thrombolytic effect on DVT and provided higher patient comfort during treatment.

Navigating between the science and art of acute limb ischemia treatment.

The diagnosis and treatment of acute limb ischemia (ALI) has long been a fierce adversary that has evolved over the last several decades with scientific advancements in endovascular therapy. History and physical examination remain the mainstay of diagnosis enhanced by detailed imaging to guide therapy. Many endovascular tools are available for prompt restoration of flow that compliment traditional surgical options. These devices incorporate the mechanical removal of thrombus and the chemical dissolution of thrombus . Medical decision-making for ALI patients must take into account the patient characteristics, anatomic variables, mechanism of ischemia, degree of ischemia, and operator skill to employ the right strategy for the right patient. This moving target challenges scientific study, making the therapeutic bedside decision making an artform. We present an overview of the field, supportive data, and a treatment algorithm that hopefully captures this delicate balance.

The perplexity of catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis: the approaches play an important role.

The recent adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial rose a controversy about the treatment effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In fact, most studies including the ATTRACT trial did not perform subgroup analysis of catheterization approaches. Different approaches would confound the conclusions. Therefore, a single-center retrospective analysis was performed to compare the differences between the antegrade (AGA) and retrograde (RGA) approaches. Total 217 DVT patients treated with CDT were enrolled from January 2010 to December 2017, with mean age of 55.3 years (67 received antegrade approach, 150 received retrograde approach). The clot burden reduction by segment was evaluated. The mean access establishment time and thrombolytic time were compared. The patency of the iliofemoral vein at 6 months was evaluated. The rate of PTS, quality of life and venous insufficiency were assessed at 1 year. AGA group showed better thrombolytic effect in popliteal and femoral vein than RGA group. The rate of iliofemoral clot burden reduction in RGA group was mostly at Grade II, while most were at Grade III in AGA group. The retrograde approach showed better thrombolysis effect in iliofemoral DVT than popliteal to iliac DVT. The RGA group reported longer mean access establishment time (5.4 ± 1.8 vs 27.0 ± 7.5 min, p < 0.001) and thrombolytic time (6.9 ± 1.5 days vs 6.8 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.586). At 6 months, RGA group had a lower rate of femoral vein patency (52.0% vs 89.6%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of venous insufficiency (52.0% vs 29.9%, p < 0.001), compared with AGA group. Although there was no difference in the rate of PTS, the RGA group showed higher Villalta scores in the free and mild PTS. The antegrade approach was preferably recommended over the retrograde approach for CDT treatment.

Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Neonatal IVC and Bilateral Renal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report.

Renal vein thrombosis is the most common non-catheter-associated venous thromboembolism event in neonates, accounting for up to 20% of cases. Although mortality rates are lower than a variety of other forms of pediatric thrombosis, renal vein thrombi are associated with significant short-term and long-term sequelae. This report presents the case of a full-term neonate presenting with bilateral renal vein thrombosis with inferior vena cava involvement treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. This case report intends to highlight the value of a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric venous thromboembolism and to outline relevant procedural details and current laboratory and imaging monitoring of catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Catheter-directed therapies for pulmonary embolism: considerations for patients with patent foramen ovale.

Pulmonary embolism can be fatal, especially in high-risk patients who have contraindications to systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy. For this population, interventionalists can provide catheter-directed therapies, including catheter-directed thrombolysis and thrombectomy, using a wide array of devices. Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism shows great promise through fractionated thrombolytic drug delivery, fragmentation, and aspiration mechanisms with thrombectomy devices. Although successful outcomes have been reported after using these treatments, evidence is especially limited in patients with both a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and acute pulmonary embolism. In patients with PFO, it is important to consider whether catheter-directed therapy is appropriate or whether surgical embolectomy should instead be performed. An increased risk of paradoxical embolus in these patients supports the use of diagnostic echocardiography with possible surgical closure of PFO after one episode of pulmonary embolism. Percutaneous PFO closure, which can be performed at the time of catheter-based therapy, theoretically reduces risk of future paradoxical embolization, although more data are needed before making a recommendation for this specific group of patients.

Safety and efficacy of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy via a new infusion catheter in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with large thrombus burden: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A large intracoronary thrombus burden is associated with adverse clinical results. The optimal management of this scenario remains unknown. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a new rapid infusion catheter combined with low-dose intracoronary thrombolysis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with a large thrombus burden. METHODS AND RESULTS: This pilot study included 22 patients with STEMI with a large thrombus burden. A large thrombus burden was defined as a definite thrombus with the largest dimension of at least two vessel diameters [thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) thrombus grades 4 and 5]. All patients received primary percutaneous coronary intervention guided by the presence of recurrent chest pain or clinical myocardial ischemia evidences. All patients regained myocardial perfusion immediately after the infusion catheter crossed the thrombus. Local fibrinolysis with low-dose recombinant human prourokinase was administered continuously via the infusion catheter for 30 min. Repeat coronary angiography revealed marked thrombus resolution, with an improvement in TIMI flow from 0.14 ± 0.35 at baseline to 2.82 ± 0.40. Only one patient with postlysis thrombus grades 4-5 was observed. No major bleeding events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI presenting with a large thrombus burden, all patients regained myocardial perfusion immediately after the infusion catheter crossed over the thrombus, and low doses of intracoronary thrombolysis could significantly reduce the thrombus burden and improve the coronary flow without major bleeding.

Association of Successful Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with Postthrombotic Syndrome: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CAVA Trial.

BACKGROUND: The CAVA trial did not show the anticipated risk reduction for postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) after thrombus removal via additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UACDT) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT). Difficulties in achieving an effective degree of recanalization through thrombolysis may have influenced outcomes. We therefore assessed whether successful UACDT (restored patency ≥ 90%) did reduce the development of PTS. METHODS: This CAVA trial post hoc analysis compared the proportion of PTS at 1-year follow-up between patients with successful UACDT and patients that received standard treatment only. In addition, clinical impact as well as determinants of successful thrombolysis were explored. RESULTS: UACDT was initiated in 77 (50.7%) patients and considered successful in 41 (53.2%, interrater agreement κ = 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.83). PTS developed in 15/41 (36.6%) patients in the successful UACDT group versus 33/75 (44.0%) controls (p = 0.44). In this comparison, successful UACDT was associated with lower Venous Clinical Severity Score (3.50 ± 2.57 vs. 4.82 ± 2.74, p = 0.02) and higher EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) scores (40.2 ± 36.4 vs. 23.4 ± 34.4, p = 0.01). Compared with unsuccessful UACDT, successful UACDT was associated with a shorter symptom duration at inclusion (p = 0.05), and higher rates of performed adjunctive procedures (p < 0.001) and stent placement (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Successful UACDT was not associated with a reduced proportion of PTS 1 year after acute IFDVT compared with patients receiving standard treatment alone. There was, however, a significant reduction in symptom severity and improvement of generic quality of life according to the EQ-5D. Better patient selection and optimization of treatment protocols are needed to assess the full potential of UACDT for the prevention of PTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00970619.

Viral Coagulopathy in Patients With COVID-19: Treatment and Care.

COVID-19 has proven to be particularly challenging given the complex pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Early data have demonstrated how the host response to this novel coronavirus leads to the proliferation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, massive endothelial damage, and generalized vascular manifestations. While SARS-CoV-2 primarily targets the upper and lower respiratory tract, other organ systems are also affected. SARS-CoV-2 relies on 2 host cell receptors for successful attachment: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and transmembrane protease serine 2. Clinicopathologic reports have demonstrated associations between severe COVID-19 and viral coagulopathy, resulting in pulmonary embolism; venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis; lung endothelial injury; and associated thrombotic complications leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Viral coagulopathy is not novel given similar observations with SARS classic, including the consumption of platelets, generation of thrombin, and increased fibrin degradation product exhibiting overt disseminated intravascular coagulation-like syndrome. The specific mechanism(s) behind the thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients has yet to be fully understood. Parenteral anticoagulants, such as heparin and low-molecular-weights heparins, are widely used in the management of COVID-19 patients. Beyond the primary (anticoagulant) effects of these agents, they may exhibit antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective effects. Direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are also useful in the management of these patients. Tissue plasminogen activator and other fibrinolytic modalities may also be helpful in the overall management. Catheter-directed thrombolysis can be used in patients developing pulmonary embolism. Further investigations are required to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19-associated thrombotic complications.

Catheter-Directed Thrombectomy for Highly Symptomatic Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis not Responsive to Conservative Treatment.

PURPOSE: The use of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) not responsive to conservative treatment is under-investigated until now. This prompted us to review and analyze our results (technical/clinical outcome, complications) and compare them to the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 19 patients (14 women and 5 men; mean age: 41.2 years, SD: 18.2) with iliofemoral DVT and excessive pain not responsive to conservative treatment were treated with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Demographics, technical success and clinical outcome data (pain score/Villalta score) were collected. RESULTS: Thrombectomy ± thrombolysis was successful in all cases (n = 19). No major complications were observed. Eight out of nineteen cases developed hematoma at the sheath insertion site not requiring further treatment. Seven out of nineteen cases required additional continuous lysis for complete iliofemoral clot solution. All patients received balloon angioplasty to treat post-thrombotic strictures. In 16/19 cases, stents were placed to preserve iliofemoral caliber and maintain unrestricted iliac venous outflow. Three patients (16%) required re-intervention due to re-thrombosis or in-stent stenosis after 4, 14 days and 4 months, respectively. Symptoms could be improved temporarily or indefinitely in 19 out of 19 patients. 1 year following thrombectomy mean pain score was reduced by 87%, mean Villalta score was 2.6 (SD: 4), and iliofemoral veins were patent in 15/17 patients. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients with iliofemoral DVT, refractory to conservative treatment, catheter-directed thrombectomy enables rapid and long-lasting pain relief. High patency rates can be achieved in patients receiving PTA and venous stenting post-thrombectomy.

Feasibility of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis of case series.

BACKGROUND: During the past few years, there has been a surge in the use of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (UACDT) for submassive pulmonary embolism (SPE). However, few studies evaluated the feasibility of UACDT for SPE. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of UACDT in treating SPE. METHODS: A comprehensive search of online databases was performed. Search terms UACDT in SPE were entered into PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library to identify related articles published until October 2018. A quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using R statistical software. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 485 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled right ventricular/left ventricular ratio decrease and pulmonary artery systolic pressure drop after treatment was -0.34 (95% CI: -0.43, -0.25) and -15.05 (95% CI: -18.10, -12.00) mm Hg, respectively. The pooled major bleeding rate was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.0%, 3.0%), and the in-hospital mortality was 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0%, 1.0%). CONCLUSION: This up to data meta-analysis confirms that UACDT is a feasible treatment for SPE.

Same-Day ICU Discharge in Selected Patients With Severe Submassive Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis.

A retrospective review from July 2016 to April 2018 was performed of 23 patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) who received catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Five (22%) of the 23 patients were discharged the same day from the intensive care unit (ICU) following thrombolysis completion. Their presentation, hospital courses, complications, and follow-up are reviewed. All 5 patients were diagnosed using chest computed tomography (CT) demonstrating a clot in the pulmonary vasculature and right ventricle dysfunction based on abnormal right ventricle to left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio. Patients with severe right heart dysfunction (RV/LV ratio ≥1.4) were protocolized to receive CDT via EkoSonic catheters (EKOS Corporation). Postoperatively, patients were admitted to the ICU with continuous alteplase at 1 mg/h. Echocardiography was then performed after 24 hours of therapy to assess right ventricle function and removal of EkoSonic catheters. Patients with reversal of right heart dysfunction and symptomatic improvement received bedside removal of catheters. The mean patient age was 50.6 years and body mass index was 33.6. Mean RV/LV ratio on admission via CT imaging was 1.56, with a mean troponin of 0.44. Interval mean RV/LV ratio on echocardiography after thrombolysis therapy was 0.91. There was a 0% incidence of periprocedural complications. One (20%) patient out of 5 had an emergency department visit 10 days postdischarge for acute shortness of breath, with workup revealing no evidence of recurrent PE. No patient required hospital readmission within 30 days. At the 6-week follow-up, all patients had continued normal right ventricular function noted on echocardiography. This case series demonstrates that for a select population of patients with severe submassive PE, the use of CDT and echocardiography monitoring can facilitate same-day discharge from the ICU.

Use of Multimodal Interventional Radiology with an Intracerebral Artery Stent Retriever for Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Thrombosis: A Case Report.

Acute superior mesenteric artery thrombosis is usually fatal; however, early intravascular treatment using a mechanical thrombectomy device can be an effective intervention. A 70-year-old man with atrial fibrillation presented with sudden abdominal pain; superior mesenteric artery thrombosis was confirmed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Thrombolysis, mechanical fragmentation, aspiration, and thrombectomy were successfully performed using the Trevo® XP ProVue stent retriever via a brachial approach, and intestinal necrosis was avoided. Thus, intravascular treatment of superior mesenteric artery thrombosis can be performed using a relatively low-profile catheter and a brachial artery approach, allowing the implementation of a multimodal interventional radiological approach tailored for individual cases.

Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. The technological landscape for management of acute intermediate- and high-risk PE is rapidly evolving. Two interventional devices using pharmacomechanical means to recanalize the pulmonary arteries have recently been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration for marketing, and several others are in various stages of development. The purpose of this document is to clarify the current state of endovascular interventional therapy for acute PE and to provide considerations for evidence development for new devices that will define which patients with PE would derive the greatest net benefit from their use in various clinical settings. First, definitions and limitations of commonly used risk stratification tools for PE are reviewed. An adjudication of risks and benefits of available interventional therapies for PE follows. Next, considerations for optimal future evidence development in this field are presented in the context of the current US regulatory framework. Finally, the document concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of the rapidly expanding PE response team model of care delivery.

Pulmonary Embolism and Severe Asthma: Case Report and Literature Review.

Pulmonary embolism is a life-threatening disease. Its development is generally thought to be due to causes collectively known as the Virchow's triad. Chronic inflammations are associated with the activation of coagulation and increased risks of venous thromboembolic events. Asthma is one of the chronic inflammatory diseases associated with procoagulants and antifibrinolytic activities in the airways. Coagulation is activated in patients with asthma with the following steps of pathophysiology: Increased tissue factor expression in various cell types, decreased activity of the anticoagulant protein C system and inhibition of fibrinolysis through over-production of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). Asthma is therefore likely a risk factor for pulmonary embolism, especially in those patients with severe disease conditions together with frequent exacerbation. Here we present a case of severe asthma associated with coagulopathy and complicated by massive pulmonary embolism, presented with typical S1Q3T3 on electrocardiography (ECG) and massive thrombosis on computed tomography angiography, successfully treated with directed catheter thrombolytic therapy.

Catheter-directed intra-arterial thrombolysis for lower extremity arterial occlusions.

Catheter-directed intra-arterial thrombolysis (CDT) is a rational treatment method in patients with acute/subacute and even some chronic occlusions of lower extremity arteries and bypass grafts having salvageable limb ischemia. Immediate vessel patency can be achieved with an acceptable complication rate in many patients, especially those with fresh thrombus or emboli. It can be also an adjuvant treatment modality for endovascular interventions for chronic occlusions. There is no standard method of CDT including thrombolytic agent dose and technique. Selection of treatment strategy should be based on individual judgment based on viability of limb, lesion characteristics, and risks of hemorrhage.