Development and validation of LC-MS/MS methods to measure tobramycin and lincomycin in plasma, microdialysis fluid and urine: application to a pilot pharmacokinetic research study.

Background The aim of our work was to develop and validate a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-ESI-MS/MS) methods for the quantification of tobramycin (TMC) and lincomycin (LMC)in plasma, microdialysis fluid and urine. Methods Protein precipitation was used to extract TMC and LMC from plasma, while microdialysis fluid and urine sample were diluted prior to instrumental analysis. Mobile phase A consisted of 2 mM ammonium acetate in 10% acetonitrile with 0.2% formic acid (v/v) and mobile phase B consisted of 2 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile with 0.2% formic acid (v/v). Gradient separation (80%-10% of mobile phase B) for TMC was done using a SeQuant zic-HILIC analytical guard column. While separation of LMC was performed using gradient elution (100%-40% of mobile phase B) on a SeQuant zic-HILIC analytical column equipped with a SeQuant zic-HILIC guard column. Vancomycin (VCM) was used as an internal standard. A quadratic calibration was obtained over the concentration range for plasma of 0.1-20 mg/L for TMC and 0.05-20 mg/L for LMC, for microdialysis fluid of 0.1-20 mg/L for both TMC and LMC, and 1-100 mg/L for urine for both TMC and LMC. Results For TMS and LMC, validation testing for matrix effects, precision and accuracy, specificity and stability were all within acceptance criteria of ±15%. Conclusions The methods described here meet validation acceptance criteria and were suitable for application in a pilot pharmacokinetic research study performed in a sheep model.

Precautionary Practices of Respiratory Therapists and Other Health-Care Practitioners Who Administer Aerosolized Medications.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapists (RTs) and other health-care workers are potentially exposed to a variety of aerosolized medications. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Health and Safety Practices Survey of Healthcare Workers describes current exposure control practices and barriers to using personal protective equipment during administration of selected aerosolized medications. METHODS: An anonymous, multi-module, web-based survey was conducted among members of health-care professional practice organizations representing RTs, nurses, and other health-care practitioners. A module on aerosolized medications included submodules for antibiotics (amikacin, colistin, and tobramycin), pentamidine, and ribavirin. RESULTS: The submodules on antibiotics, pentamidine, and ribavirin were completed by 321, 227, and 50 respondents, respectively, most of whom were RTs. The relatively low number of ribavirin respondents precluded meaningful interpretation of these data and may reflect the rare use of this drug. Consequently, analysis focused on pentamidine, classified by NIOSH as a hazardous drug, and the antibiotics amikacin, colistin, and tobramycin, which currently lack authoritative safe handling guidelines. Respondents who administered pentamidine were more likely to adhere to good work practices compared with those who administered the antibiotics. Examples included training received on safe handling procedures (75% vs 52%), availability of employer standard procedures (82% vs 55%), use of aerosol delivery devices equipped with an expiratory filter (96% vs 53%) or negative-pressure rooms (61% vs 20%), and always using respiratory protection (51% vs 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of safe handling guidelines for pentamidine, implementation was not universal, placing workers, co-workers, and even family members at risk of exposure. Although the antibiotics included in this study lack authoritative safe handling guidelines, prudence dictates that appropriate exposure controls be used to minimize exposure to the antibiotics and other aerosolized medications. Employers and employees share responsibility for ensuring that precautionary measures are taken to keep exposures to all aerosolized medications as low as practicable.

The integration of four major determinants of antibiotic action: bactericidal activity, postantibiotic effect, susceptibility, and pharmacokinetics.

A functional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index that could simultaneously describe three controlling PD variables, i.e., bactericidal activity, postantibiotic effect (PAE), and susceptibility, in relation to pharmacokinetics, was designed using an in vitro kinetic model. Tobramycin was tested against one standard and five clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The organisms showed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging between 1 and >1000 microg/ml. The model allowed antibiotic concentrations to be reduced exponentially from initial concentrations at fixed multiples of MIC. Antibiotic removal was performed when the decreasing concentrations hit the MIC of individual strain to provide a wide range of AUC(>MIC) within an identical frame of AUC(>MIC)/MIC (AUIC) values. Viable counts were measured at antibiotic addition and before/after its removal for bactericidal activity and PAE assessments. A linear relationship was observed between PAE and bactericidal rate constants, though the pattern varied among different strains. Characterization of the exposure (AUC(>MIC))-effect relationships using the Emax model revealed that the less susceptible strains displayed lower Emax and higher EC50 for both antimicrobial effects. By employing the AUIC as a common frame of reference, regression analysis showed a significant linear correlation (p < 0.05) between the mean PAE and bactericidal rate data and, thereby simultaneously defining the four contributing factors of the PK/PD system. It appears that the AUIC, by conveying the pharmacokinetic and susceptibility information, could serve as a PK/PD index in bridging the interdependency of PAE and bactericidal activity. More importantly, the collective assessment of these four factors would allow more optimal evaluation of dosage regimens.

Comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin, azlocillin, imipenem/cilastatin and tobramycin in a model of experimental septicemia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice.

The in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was studied in a septicemia model in neutropenic mice and compared to that of other antibiotics with established activity against P. aeruginosa. When given as a single agent, ciprofloxacin proved to be as effective as imipenem/cilastatin, whereas azlocillin and tobramycin were rather ineffective. After infection with higher challenge inocula, combinations of two (synergistic) antibiotics were more effective than single agent therapy in most instances. The combination of ciprofloxacin with azlocillin was at least as effective as that of imipenem/cilastatin with tobramycin. Selection of mutants with decreased sensitivity to ciprofloxacin occurred during therapy, however, post-therapy MICs of ciprofloxacin did not exceed a level of 1 mg/l and rises of MICs did not detrimentally influence treatment outcome. Taken together with the results of earlier studies, our data encourage the use of ciprofloxacin in gram-negative septicemia in neutropenic patients.

Interlot variability in gentamicin and tobramycin concentration and its possible significance.

Aminoglycoside therapy is routinely monitored at many institutions. It is widely known that serum concentrations of gentamicin and tobramycin may differ markedly among patients receiving the same doses of these drugs. One possible source of this variability may be interlot variation in the concentration of these drugs in commercial preparations. A study was designed to evaluate inter- and intralot variation in gentamicin and tobramycin concentrations at the labeled concentrations of 10 and 40 mg/ml. Multiple samples from six to 10 lots of commercially available gentamicin sulfate injection (Elkins-Sinn, Inc.) and tobramycin sulfate injection (Eli Lilly & Co.) were studied at each concentration. The actual percentage concentration of gentamicin in various lots ranged from 101 to 134% of the labeled concentrations; the actual percentage range was 101-109% at 10 mg/ml and 102-134% at 40 mg/ml labeled concentration. The actual percentage concentration of tobramycin in various lots ranged from 103 to 122% of labeled concentration; the actual percentage range was 107-117% at 10 mg/ml and 103-122% at 40 mg/ml labeled concentration. The intralot variation was less than 4% for both drugs at two concentrations. Based on these results, an 80-mg dose may in fact contain 107 mg of gentamicin or 98 mg of tobramycin. This may be clinically important in the care of patients and may at least in part explain the large variation in serum concentrations and difficulty in prediction of dosage requirements from routine monitoring. Furthermore, the available literature on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity has not considered this interlot variation in aminoglycoside concentration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)