Calcium/calcimimetic via calcium-sensing receptor ameliorates cholera toxin-induced secretory diarrhea in mice.

BACKGROUND: Enterotoxins produce diarrhea through direct epithelial action and indirectly by activating the enteric nervous system. Calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) inhibits both actions. The latter has been well documented in vitro but not in vivo. The hypothesis to be tested was that activating CaSR inhibits diarrhea in vivo. AIM: To determine whether CaSR agonists ameliorate secretory diarrhea evoked by cholera toxin (CTX) in mice. METHODS: CTX was given orally to C57BL/6 mice to induce diarrhea. Calcium and calcimimetic R568 were used to activate CaSR. To maximize their local intestinal actions, calcium was administered luminally via oral rehydration solution (ORS), whereas R568 was applied serosally using an intraperitoneal route. To verify that their actions resulted from the intestine, effects were also examined on Cre-lox intestine-specific CaSR knockouts. Diarrhea outcome was measured biochemically by monitoring changes in fecal Cl- or clinically by assessing stool consistency and weight loss. RESULTS: CTX induced secretory diarrhea, as evidenced by increases in fecal Cl-, stool consistency, and weight loss following CTX exposure, but did not alter CaSR, neither in content nor in function. Accordingly, calcium and R568 were each able to ameliorate diarrhea when applied to diseased intestines. Intestinal CaSR involvement is suggested by gene knockout experiments where the anti-diarrheal actions of R568 were lost in intestinal epithelial CaSR knockouts (villinCre/Casrflox/flox) and neuronal CaSR knockouts (nestinCre/Casrflox/flox). CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute secretory diarrheas remains a global challenge. Despite advances in diarrhea research, few have been made in the realm of diarrhea therapeutics. ORS therapy has remained the standard of care, although it does not halt the losses of intestinal fluid and ions caused by pathogens. There is no cost-effective therapeutic for diarrhea. This and other studies suggest that adding calcium to ORS or using calcimimetics to activate intestinal CaSR might represent a novel approach for treating secretory diarrheal diseases.

Basophil-derived IL-6 regulates TH17 cell differentiation and CD4 T cell immunity.

Basophils are rare, circulating granulocytes proposed to be involved in T helper (TH) type 2 immunity, mainly through secretion of interleukin (IL)-4. In addition to IL-4, basophils produce IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in response to immunoglobulin E (IgE) crosslinking. Differentiation of TH17 cells requires IL-6 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, but whether basophils play a significant role in TH17 induction is unknown. Here we show a role for basophils in TH17 cell development by using in vitro T cell differentiation and in vivo TH17-mediated inflammation models. Bone marrow derived-basophils (BMBs) and splenic basophils produce significant amounts of IL-6 as well as IL-4 following stimulation with IgE crosslink or cholera toxin (CT). In addition, through IL-6 secretion, BMBs cooperate with dendritic cells to promote TH17 cell differentiation. In the TH17 lung inflammation model, basophils are recruited to the inflamed lungs following CT challenge, and TH17 responses are significantly reduced in the absence of basophils or IL-6. Furthermore, reconstitution with wild-type, but not IL-6-deficient, basophils restored CT-mediated lung inflammation. Lastly, basophil-deficient mice showed reduced phenotypes of TH17-dependent experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Therefore, our results indicate that basophils are an important inducer of TH17 cell differentiation, which is dependent on IL-6 secretion.

Histone acetyltransferease p300 modulates TIM4 expression in dendritic cells.

TIM4 (T cell immunoglobulin mucin domain molecule-4) plays a critical role in the initiation of skewed T helper (Th) 2 polarization. The factors regulating TIM4 expression are unclear. This study tests a hypothesis that p300 and STAT6 (signal transducer and activator transcription-6) regulates TIM4 expression in dendritic cells (DC). In this study, a food allergy mouse model was developed with ovalbumin (a specific antigen) and cholera toxin (CT; an adjuvant). The chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was performed to evaluate the chromatin changes at TIM4 and STAT6 promoters. The TIM4 expression was evaluated by real time RT-PCR and Western blotting. The results showed that high levels of p300 and TIM4 were detected in the intestinal DCs of mice with intestinal allergy. p300 is involved in the CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs. p300 interacts with the chromatin at the TIM4 promoter locus in DCs isolated from allergic mice. CT increases p300 expression to regulate STAT6 levels in DCs. STAT6 mediates the CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs. In conclusion, p300 and STAT6 mediate the microbial product CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs.

Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhoea.

BACKGROUND: Infection with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) bacteria is a common cause of diarrhoea in adults and children in developing countries and is a major cause of 'travellers' diarrhoea' in people visiting or returning from endemic regions. A killed whole cell vaccine (Dukoral®), primarily designed and licensed to prevent cholera, has been recommended by some groups to prevent travellers' diarrhoea in people visiting endemic regions. This vaccine contains a recombinant B subunit of the cholera toxin that is antigenically similar to the heat labile toxin of ETEC. This review aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this vaccine and other vaccines designed specifically to protect people against diarrhoea caused by ETEC infection. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of vaccines for preventing ETEC diarrhoea. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and http://clinicaltrials.gov up to December 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing use of vaccines to prevent ETEC with use of no intervention, a control vaccine (either an inert vaccine or a vaccine normally given to prevent an unrelated infection), an alternative ETEC vaccine, or a different dose or schedule of the same ETEC vaccine in healthy adults and children living in endemic regions, intending to travel to endemic regions, or volunteering to receive an artificial challenge of ETEC bacteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed each trial for eligibility and risk of bias. Two independent reviewers extracted data from the included studies and analyzed the data using Review Manager (RevMan) software. We reported outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs, including 53,247 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Four studies assessed the protective efficacy of oral cholera vaccines when used to prevent diarrhoea due to ETEC and seven studies assessed the protective efficacy of ETEC-specific vaccines. Of these 11 studies, seven studies presented efficacy data from field trials and four studies presented efficacy data from artificial challenge studies. An additional 13 trials contributed safety and immunological data only. Cholera vaccinesThe currently available, oral cholera killed whole cell vaccine (Dukoral®) was evaluated for protection of people against 'travellers' diarrhoea' in a single RCT in people arriving in Mexico from the USA. We did not identify any statistically significant effects on ETEC diarrhoea or all-cause diarrhoea (one trial, 502 participants, low quality evidence).Two earlier trials, one undertaken in an endemic population in Bangladesh and one undertaken in people travelling from Finland to Morocco, evaluated a precursor of this vaccine containing purified cholera toxin B subunit rather than the recombinant subunit in Dukoral®. Short term protective efficacy against ETEC diarrhoea was demonstrated, lasting for around three months (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.71; two trials, 50,227 participants). This vaccine is no longer available. ETEC vaccinesAn ETEC-specific, killed whole cell vaccine, which also contains the recombinant cholera toxin B-subunit, was evaluated in people travelling from the USA to Mexico or Guatemala, and from Austria to Latin America, Africa, or Asia. We did not identify any statistically significant differences in ETEC-specific diarrhoea or all-cause diarrhoea (two trials, 799 participants), and the vaccine was associated with increased vomiting (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.45; nine trials, 1528 participants). The other ETEC-specific vaccines in development have not yet demonstrated clinically important benefits. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence from RCTs to support the use of the oral cholera vaccine Dukoral® for protecting travellers against ETEC diarrhoea. Further research is needed to develop safe and effective vaccines to provide both short and long-term protection against ETEC diarrhoea.

[Influence of plant extracts on the activity of cholera toxin of Vibrio cholerae].

AIM: Study the activity of plant extracts against cholera toxin (CT) of Vibrio cholerae O1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antitoxic activity of plant extracts was determined by using enzyme immunoassay and CHO-K1 cell culture. RESULTS: 8 water extracts of plants were studied. Extracts of nut, tutsan, milfoil, basil do not have effect on CT activity in EIA or CHO-K1 cell culture. Celandine and rhubarb extracts do not reduce CT immunochemical activity but prevent elongation of CHO-K1 cells. Oak and hop extracts suppress binding in EIA of cholera toxin and GM1 receptors and insignificantly reduce its activity in cell culture. CONCLUSION: Antitoxic activityofplant extracts against CT is perspective for the development of preparations possessing inhibition effect.

Safety of the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, killed whole-cell (rBS-WC) oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: Mass vaccinations are a main strategy in the deployment of oral cholera vaccines. Campaigns avoid giving vaccine to pregnant women because of the absence of safety data of the killed whole-cell oral cholera (rBS-WC) vaccine. Balancing this concern is the known higher risk of cholera and of complications of pregnancy should cholera occur in these women, as well as the lack of expected adverse events from a killed oral bacterial vaccine. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From January to February 2009, a mass rBS-WC vaccination campaign of persons over two years of age was conducted in an urban and a rural area (population 51,151) in Zanzibar. Pregnant women were advised not to participate in the campaign. More than nine months after the last dose of the vaccine was administered, we visited all women between 15 and 50 years of age living in the study area. The outcome of pregnancies that were inadvertently exposed to at least one oral cholera vaccine dose and those that were not exposed was evaluated. 13,736 (94%) of the target women in the study site were interviewed. 1,151 (79%) of the 1,453 deliveries in 2009 occurred during the period when foetal exposure to the vaccine could have occurred. 955 (83%) out of these 1,151 mothers had not been vaccinated; the remaining 196 (17%) mothers had received at least one dose of the oral cholera vaccine. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds ratios for birth outcomes among the exposed and unexposed pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found no statistically significant evidence of a harmful effect of gestational exposure to the rBS-WC vaccine. These findings, along with the absence of a rational basis for expecting a risk from this killed oral bacterial vaccine, are reassuring but the study had insufficient power to detect infrequent events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00709410.

Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 alleviates food allergic manifestations in sensitized mice by reducing IL-13 expression specifically in the ileum.

OBJECTIVE: Utilizing a food allergy murine model, we have investigated the intrinsic antiallergic potential of the Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 strain. METHODS: BALB/c mice were sensitized at weekly intervals with ovalbumin (OVA) plus cholera toxin (CT) by the oral route for 7 weeks. In this model, an oral challenge with a high dose of OVA at the end of the sensitization period leads to clinical symptoms. Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 was given to mice via the drinking water during sensitization (prevention phase) or after sensitization (management phase). RESULTS: Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 administration to sensitized mice strikingly reduced allergic manifestations in the management phase upon challenge, when compared to control mice. No preventive effect was observed with the strain. Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 significantly decreased relative expression levels of the Th-2 cytokine, IL-13, and associated chemokines CCL11 (eotaxin-1) and CCL17 (TARC) in the ileum. No effect was observed in the jejunum. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results taken together designate Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 as a candidate probiotic strain appropriate in the management of allergic symptoms.

A tannic acid-based medical food, Cesinex(®), exhibits broad-spectrum antidiarrheal properties: a mechanistic and clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a tannic acid-based medical food, Cesinex(®), in the treatment of diarrhea and to investigate the mechanisms underlying its antidiarrheal effect. METHODS: Cesinex(®) was prescribed to six children and four adults with diarrhea. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for the primary outcome. Cesinex(®) and its major component, tannic acid, were tested for their effects on cholera toxin-induced intestinal fluid secretion in mice. Polarized human gut epithelial cells (HT29-CL19A cells) were used to investigate the effects of tannic acid on epithelial barrier properties, transepithelial chloride secretion, and cell viability. RESULTS: Successful resolution of diarrheal symptoms was reported in nine of ten patients receiving Cesinex(®). The treatment of HT29-CL19A cells with clinically relevant concentrations of tannic acid (0.01-1 mg/ml) significantly increased transepithelial resistance (TER) and inhibited the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-dependent or the calcium-activated Cl(-) secretion. Tannic acid could also improve the impaired epithelial barrier function induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and inhibited the disrupting effect of TNFα on the epithelial barrier function in these cells. Cholera toxin (CTX)-induced mouse intestinal fluid secretion was significantly reduced by the administration of Cesinex(®) or tannic acid. Cesinex(®) has high antioxidant capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Cesinex(®) demonstrates efficacy and a good safety profile in the treatment of diarrhea. The broad-spectrum antidiarrheal effect of Cesinex(®) can be attributed to a combination of factors: its ability to improve the epithelial barrier properties, to inhibit intestinal fluid secretion, and the high antioxidant capacity.

Clinical trial: the safety and short-term efficacy of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit in the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The cholera toxin B subunit ameliorates experimentally induced colitis in mice. In humans, cholera toxin B subunit has never been tested in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with recombinant cholera toxin B subunit of patients with CD. METHODS: An open-label, multicentre, nonrandomized trial including 15 patients with mild/moderate CD. Patients received an oral solution of 5 mg recombinant cholera toxin B subunit three times weekly for 2 weeks. Reduction in CD Activity Index (CDAI) with >100 between baseline and days 15, 29, 42 and 70 defined clinical response. Patients with CDAI score < or = 150 were defined as being in remission. RESULTS: A significant decrease in CDAI score was observed. Response rates were 40% in the full analysis set and 42% in the per protocol analysis. Two patients receiving adjuvant treatment after day 29 were excluded, after which 40% were in remission at 4 weeks and 30% at 8 weeks post-treatment. Mild side effects (arthralgia, headache and pruritus) were seen in 33% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with recombinant cholera toxin B subunit was safe. Approximately 40% of patients with active CD responded to treatment. Randomized studies are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit.

Co-administration of cholera toxin and apple polyphenol extract as a novel and safe mucosal adjuvant strategy.

Although native cholera toxin (CT) is an extremely effective adjuvant, its toxicity prevents its use in humans. We report here that apple polyphenol extract (APE), obtained from unripe apples, reduces CT-induced morphological changes and cAMP accumulation. Based upon this finding, we have attempted to design a novel, effective and safe mucosal vaccine by using CT with several dosages of APE as nasal adjuvants. Mice nasally immunized with OVA plus CT and an optimal dosage of APE showed significantly reduced levels of inflammatory responses as well as total and OVA-specific IgE antibodies when compared with mice given without APE. However, levels of both mucosal and systemic OVA-specific antibody responses were maintained. Further, APE significantly down-regulated accumulation of CT in the olfactory nerves and epithelium. In summary, an optimal dosage of APE would take full advantage of mucosal adjuvanticity of native CT without any toxicity for application in humans.

A novel adjuvant for mucosal immunity to HIV-1 gp120 in nonhuman primates.

The development of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant is a crucial step toward a mucosal HIV/AIDS vaccine. This study seeks to determine the promise of a nontoxic mutant of cholera toxin (mCT; E112K) as a mucosal adjuvant in nonhuman primates. HIV-1 gp120 was nasally administered together with mCT E112K or native CT (nCT) as adjuvant on five to six occasions over a 6- to 8-wk period to groups of four rhesus macaques and alone to two monkeys that acted as controls. Macaques given nasal gp120 with either mCT E112K or nCT showed elevated gp120-specific IgG and IgA Ab responses with virus-neutralizing activity in both their plasma and mucosal external secretions, as well as higher numbers of gp120-specific IgA Ab-forming cells in their mucosal and peripheral lymphoid tissues and of IL-4-producing Th2-type CD4-positive (CD4(+)) T cells than did controls. Even though significant mucosal adjuvanticity was seen with both mCT E112K and nCT, neuronal damage was observed only in the nCT-treated, but not in the control or mCT E112K-treated groups. These results clearly show that mCT E112K is an effective and safe mucosal adjuvant for the development of a nasal HIV/AIDS vaccine.

Adjuvant danger signals increase the immune response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

The immune response of swine to vaccination with a live, attenuated PRRSV was assessed in the presence and absence of cytokine adjuvants or cholera toxin (CT) to address the hypothesis that adjuvant danger signals, that is, inflammatory cytokines and bacterial extoxin, stimulate a more robust immune response. Animals received four injections of recombinant porcine IL-1 and IL-6, IL-12 alone, or CT alone within 1 week of intramuscular administration of a vaccine strain of PRRSV, Ingelvac MLV. Serological and cell-mediated responses were monitored for 42 days after vaccination and for a further 10 days after challenge with the virulent VR2332 strain of PRRSV. First, the principal observation was an enhancing effect of IL-12 on the interferon gamma response to PRRSV, with a more rapid and heightened PRRSV-specific interferon gamma ELISPOT response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The more rapid and robust development of a cell-mediated immune response, as determined by this assay, suggests that IL-12 may influence the induction of antigen-specific T cell responses. Second, animals that received CT adjuvant displayed a more robust antibody response to GP5, the major envelope glycoprotein. Anti-GP5 titers peaked at 21 days after vaccination at more than twice the level of any other treatment, for which the peak response was at 28 days. Third, there was no evidence of PRRSV immunosuppression of immunity to unrelated antigens, including circovirus. CT is a potent mucosal adjuvant, particularly for antibody responses. It acts in part through the production of IL-1 in macrophages, but its effect was not replaced by combination treatment with IL-1 and IL-6. In sum, the results suggest that cytokine adjuvants, particularly IL-12, and CT have the potential to enhance immune responses to live viral vaccines.

Effects of intranasal administration of cholera toxin (or Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin) B subunits supplemented with a trace amount of the holotoxin on the brain.

Effects of intranasal administration of cholera toxin (CT) [or Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)] B subunits supplemented with a trace amount of the holotoxin, CTB* or LTB*, on the brain were examined in BALB/c mice by comparing with those of the intracerebral injection. Intracerebral injection of CTB* at doses more than 10 microg/mouse caused significant body weight loss and dose-dependent death within 7 days, with localization of conjugates of horseradish peroxidase with CTB (HRP-CTB) in the ventricular system and in the perineural space of olfactory nerves of the nasal mucosa 3 h after injection. Intracerebral injection of CTB* at doses less than 3 microg/mouse (or LTB* at doses less than 22.7 microg/mouse) did not cause any significant body weight loss for 7 days, with localization of HRP-CTB in the brain but not in the nasal mucosa. On the other hand, intranasal administration of 10 microg of CTB* caused localization of HRP-CTB in the nasal mucosa but not in the brain 3 h after administration and caused body weight loss even after 30 administrations. Neither any histological changes of brain tissues nor marked changes in serum biochemical parameters were found in mice after the 30 administrations of CTB* or LTB*. These results suggest that 0.1 microg of CTB* or LTB*, which is known to be close to the minimal effective dose as an adjuvant for nasal influenza vaccine in mice and corresponds to 100 microg per person, can be used as a safe nasal adjuvant without adversely affecting the brain.

Antibody responses in the lower respiratory tract and male urogenital tract in humans after nasal and oral vaccination with cholera toxin B subunit.

Nasal vaccine delivery is superior to oral delivery in inducing specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG antibody responses in the upper respiratory tract. Although an antibody response in the nasal passages is important in protecting against primary colonization with lung pathogens, antibodies in the lungs are usually required as well. We immunized 15 male volunteers twice nasally or orally with cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and determined the specific antibody levels in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and urine before and 2 weeks after immunization. Nasal immunization induced fivefold increases in the levels of specific IgA antibodies in BAL fluid of most volunteers, whereas there were no significant specific IgA responses after oral immunization. The specific IgG antibody level increased eightfold in BAL fluid in the nasally vaccinated subjects, and the major part of IgG had most probably been transferred from serum. Since the specific IgG response in serum was lower in the individuals vaccinated orally, the IgG response in BAL fluid in this group was also lower and not significant. In conclusion, nasal immunization is also preferable to the oral route when vaccinating against lower respiratory tract infections, and a systemic immune response is considerably more important in the lower than in the upper respiratory tract. Moreover, both nasal and oral immunizations were able to stimulate 6- to 10-fold specific IgA and IgG responses in urine in about half of the individuals, which indicates that distant mucosal vaccination might be used to prevent adhesion of pathogens to the urogenital tract.

Oral, inactivated, whole cell enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli plus cholera toxin B subunit vaccine: results of the initial evaluation in children. PRIDE Study Group.

Two randomized, double-blinded trials assessed the safety and immunogenicity of an oral, killed enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) plus cholera toxin B subunit vaccine in Egyptian children. Two doses of vaccine or E. coli K-12 were given 2 weeks apart to 105 6- to 12-year-olds and 97 2- to 5-year-olds. Safety was monitored for 3 days after each dose. Blood was collected before immunization and 7 days after each dose to measure immune responses. Few children reported postdosing symptoms, with no differences in the frequency of symptoms between treatment groups. Most vaccinees had an IgA antibody-secreting cell response against colonization factor antigen I (100%, 6-12 years; 95%, 2-5 years), coli surface antigen 2 (92%, 6-12 years; 83%, 2-5 years), and coli surface antigen 4 (93%, 6-12 years). Vaccination evoked a >/=4-fold rise in antitoxic IgA and IgG titers in 93% and 81% of children, respectively. In conclusion, the oral ETEC vaccine was safe and immunogenic in 2- to 12-year-old children, justifying further evaluation in infants.

Recombinant or plasma-derived antisecretory factor inhibits cholera toxin-induced increase in Evans blue permeation of rat intestinal capillaries.

The effect of cholera toxin on small intestinal capillary function, utilizing the Evans blue dye method, was analyzed. The modulatory influence of plasma-derived or recombinant human antisecretory factor on this variable was also investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were briefly anesthetized with ether, and a jejunal loop was constructed that was challenged for 90 min with phosphate-buffered saline or cholera toxin. Five minutes prior to death, the rats received an intravenous injection of Evans blue. The tissue content of dye in the loop was quantitated spectrophotometrically or demonstrated histochemically. Cholera toxin increased the recovery of Evans blue; extravasation of the dye was prominent in the top of the villi, while the crypts were spared. It is suggested that the toxin caused increased transcapillary permeation of albumin in a heterogenous fashion in the gut wall. This effect of the toxin was prevented by pretreatment with the antisecretory factor.

Immune responses in ileostomy fluid and serum after oral cholera vaccination of patients colectomized because of ulcerative colitis.

The capacity of an oral inactivated B-subunit-whole-cell cholera vaccine to induce immune responses in patients colectomized due to ulcerative colitis was studied. Two doses of vaccine induced significant mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody responses in ileostomy fluid against cholera toxin in 14 of 15 (93%) patients and against whole vibrios in 9 of 15 (60%) cases. The serological responses were lower (but not significantly) than those observed in healthy Swedish volunteers. Increased IgA antitoxin levels were found in ileostomy fluid as late as 2 years after vaccination.

Differential kinetics and distribution of antibodies in serum and nasal and vaginal secretions after nasal and oral vaccination of humans.

Although nasal vaccination has emerged as an interesting alternative to systemic or oral vaccination, knowledge is scarce about the immune responses after such immunization in humans. In the present study, we have compared the kinetics and organ distribution of the antibody responses after nasal and oral vaccination. We immunized female volunteers nasally or orally with cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and determined the specific antibody levels in serum and nasal and vaginal secretions, as well as the number of circulating antibody-secreting cells, before immunization and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 26 weeks thereafter. Nasal vaccination induced 9-fold CTB-specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) and 56-fold specific IgG antibody increases in nasal secretions, whereas no significant IgA increase was seen after oral vaccination. Both oral and nasal vaccination resulted in 5- to 6-fold CTB-specific IgA and 20- to 30-fold specific IgG increases in vaginal secretions. Strong serum responses to CTB were also induced by both routes of vaccination. A notable difference between nasal and oral vaccination was that the nasal route elicited a specific antibody response with a later onset but of much longer duration than did the oral route. We conclude from this study that the nasal route is superior to the oral route for administering at least nonliving vaccines against infections in the upper respiratory tract, whereas either oral or nasal vaccination might be used for eliciting antibody responses in the female genital tract.