Comparison of cholera toxin A2/B and murine interleukin-12 as adjuvants of Toxoplasma multi-antigenic SAG1-ROP2 DNA vaccine.

Toxoplasmosis can lead to severe pathology in both humans and animals. However, an effective vaccine for humans has not been successfully developed. In this study, we used multi-antigenic SAG1-ROP2 as a DNA vaccine and cholera toxin A2/B subunit and murine interleukin-12 to compare their effectiveness as genetic adjuvants. Bagg albino/c (BAL/c) mice were immunized intramuscularly with pcDNA3.1-SAG1-ROP2 alone (control group), or pcDNA3.1-SAG1-ROP2 with co-administration of pCTA2/B or pIL-12, respectively. After immunization, the effectiveness of these two adjuvants were compared using lymphocyte proliferation assay, cytokine and antibody measurements. The group co-administered pIL-12 elicited stronger humoral and Th1-type cellular immune responses than those immunized with pcDNA3.1-SAG1-ROP2 alone, while in the group co-administered pCTA2/B there was no obvious enhancement of immunity. When challenged with Toxoplasma gondii RH strain, mice immunized with pIL-12 co-administration had significantly higher survival rates, whereas there was no notable augmentation of immunity in pCTA2/B group. Therefore, since pIL-12 significantly enhanced the antigenicity of multi-antigenic DNA vaccine, this suggests that IL-12 is a better and more effective adjuvant than CTA2/B in this situation.

A proposal for safety standards for human use of cholera toxin (or Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin) derivatives as an adjuvant of nasal inactivated influenza vaccine.

Cholera toxin (CT) and Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT) are not only the causative agents of diarrhea but are also strong mucosal adjuvants which enhance immune responses to mucosally coadministered bystander antigens. One of the most promising applications of these toxins would be as mucosal adjuvant of nasal influenza vaccine. In comparison to current inactivated vaccines, the nasal vaccine provides superior cross-protection by inducing production of cross-reacting anti-viral IgA antibodies in the respiratory tract even when the vaccine strain is different from the epidemic strain. On the use of the toxins as mucosal adjuvants in humans, toxicity and allergenicity of the toxins are problems which impinge on safety. To resolve these problems, various approaches have been attempted to produce less toxic and less allergenic CT (or LT) derivatives. We now propose the following standards for human use of safer CT (or LT) derivatives as an adjuvant of a nasal influenza vaccine. Thus, CT (or LT) derivatives can be administered intranasally together with a current inactivated influenza vaccine, provided they meet the following criteria. 1) A single dose of the derivatives, administered intranasally by spraying, should be around 100 Eg/adult in a volume of less than 0.5 ml. 2) CT (or LT) derivatives should retain the properties of the native CT (or LT), i. e., the ability to augment secretory IgA and serum IgG Ab responses to viral surface glycoproteins, when administered intranasally together with an inactivated influenza vaccine. 3) CT (or LT) derivatives should not induce IgE Ab responses to the vaccine, as well as to the CT (or LT) itself. 4) The CT (or LT) should be nontoxic; the toxicity of the derivatives, as determined by the Y-1 adrenal cell assay, should not exceed 1/100 EC(50) of the native CT (or 1/1000 ECi of the native CT). 5) CT (or LT) derivatives should not cause serious disease in guinea pigs when administered intranasally or intraperitoneally at the dose used in humans (around 100 Eg).

Randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR in Swiss adults.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted in 50 healthy Swiss adults to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the live oral attenuated cholera vaccine candidate strain Vibrio cholerae CVD 103-HgR (classical, Inaba). A single dose of 5 x 10(8) viable CVD 103-HgR organisms, administered in a buffered liquid formulation, was well tolerated as compared with individuals who received an equivalent amount of heat-killed Escherichia coli K-12 placebo. Eighty-eight percent of subjects receiving CVD 103-HgR mounted a significant (greater than fourfold) rise in Inaba vibriocidal titre while 68% did so for the heterologous Ogawa serotype. The magnitude of the vibriocidal antibody response (as measured by peak geometric mean titre and by fold-rise in titre over baseline) was greater for the homologous Inaba serotype. Nineteen out of 25 volunteers (76%) responded with a significant (p less than 0.05) rise in serum antitoxin levels. No vaccinee who received the E. coli K-12 placebo mounted a significant rise in either vibriocidal or antitoxin antibody levels. These results corrobrate the safety and immunogenicity of CVD 103-HgR in healthy adult volunteers.

Oral immunization of dogs with purified cholera toxin, crude cholera toxin, or B subunit: evidence for synergistic protection by antitoxic and antibacterial mechanisms.

The immunogenicity and safety of purified cholera toxin (CT), its B subunit, and a crude culture filtrate of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae (CrT) were compared in dogs immunized orally and challenged with virulent V. cholerae. CT and CrT caused marked protection in two- or three-dose regimens. Protection due to CT occurred only with doses that caused transient, sometimes severe, diarrhea in most dogs; this protection was proportional to the peak antitoxin response in jejunal mucosa and lasted at least 15 weeks. In contrast, minimum protective doses of CrT contained much less cholera toxin, caused very mild diarrhea in only 21% of the dogs, and evoked protection that was greater than predicted from the modest jejunal antitoxin response. B subunit caused smaller jejunal antitoxin responses than did similar doses of CT and was poorly protective, the 50% protective dose being >40-fold greater than that of CT. Two observations indicated that protection due to CrT involved synergy between antibacterial and antitoxic immune responses. First, the 50% protective dose of CrT was 24-fold and >36-fold smaller than the 50% protective doses of its CT and non-CT antigenic components, respectively, when tested separately. Second, protection was greater in CrT-immunized dogs than in CT-immunized dogs for a given mucosal antitoxin response. Low doses of CrT evoked serotype-specific protection, indicating that the serotype-specific O somatic antigen contributed significatly to antibacterial protection. These results suggest that a simple, effective, nonliving oral vaccine for cholera based on combined antibacterial and antitoxic immunity can probably be achieved. However, further studies are needed to determine how a protective antitoxic response can be evoked without causing diarrhea during immunization.