Psychosocial outcomes 1-year post total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplant.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of research regarding the psychosocial outcomes after TPIAT exists. METHODS: Adults (>18 years), adolescents (13-18 years), and children (5-12 years) with their parents were administered questionnaires at the time of evaluation for TPIAT and 1-year postsurgery to assess psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 13 adults (6 male, 46%; mean age 35.2 years) and 9 children/adolescents (4 female, 44.4%; mean age 11.78 years) with CP were included in the study. A total of 69.2% of the adults and 66.7% of the children and adolescents were insulin dependent at 1-year postsurgery. In adults, improvements on the SF-36 pain (p = .001) and general health (p = .045) subscales were generally observed 1-year postsurgery. Adult patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery compared to open surgery specifically reported better general health on the SF-36 (p < .05) at 1 year. For children and adolescents, reductions in average pain in the last week (p < .05), pain interference (p < .001), and fatigue were observed (p < .05) at 1-year postsurgery. For the entire sample, using repeated measures ANOVA and covarying for age, significant differences were found 1-year postsurgery in average pain in the last week (p = .034) and pain interference with the following categories: general activity (p < .001), walking (p = .04), normal work (p = .003), sleep (p = .002), and enjoyment in life (p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: While few transplant centers offer this treatment, the improvement in quality of life suggests this may be a viable treatment option for those with CP complicated by intractable pain. (IRB Approval PRO 19080302).

Characterization of pre-transplant psychosocial burden in an integrated national islet transplant program.

The psychological burden experienced by people with diabetes prior to islet transplantation is recognized but has not been studied comprehensively, especially in relation to glycemia. Therefore, we conducted a rigorous pre-operative psychosocial profile of UK islet transplant recipients, and compared groups with higher/lower HbA1 c to test the null hypothesis that pre-transplant hypoglycemia awareness and psychosocial burden would not be related to baseline HbA1 c in this high-risk cohort. Pre-transplant, recipients (n = 44) completed validated hypoglycemia awareness questionnaires and generic/diabetes-specific measures of psychological traits and states. Scores were compared in groups, dichotomized by HbA1 c (≤8% versus >8%). Participants were aged (mean±SD) 53 ± 10 years; 64% were women; with HbA1 c 8.3 ± 1.7%. Median rate of severe hypoglycemia over the preceding 12 months was 13 events/person-year and 90% had impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (Gold/Clarke score ≥4). Participants had elevated fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II Worry), impaired diabetes-specific quality of life (DQoL) and low generic health status (SF-36; EQ-5D). One quarter reported scores indicating likely anxiety/depression (HAD). Dispositional optimism (LOT-R) and generalized self-efficacy (GSE) were within published 'norms.' Despite negative perceptions of diabetes (including low personal control), participants were confident that islet transplantation would help (BIPQ). Hypoglycemia awareness and psychosocial profile were comparable in lower (n = 24) and higher (n = 20) HbA1 c groups. Islet transplant candidates report sub-optimal generic psychological states (anxiety/depressive symptoms), health status and diabetes-specific psychological states (fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes-specific quality of life). While their generic psychological traits (optimism, self-efficacy) are comparable with the general population, they are highly optimistic about forthcoming transplant. HbA1 c is not a proxy measure of psychosocial burden, which requires the use of validated questionnaires to systematically identify those who may benefit most from psychological assessment and support.

Patient and family expectations of beta-cell replacement therapies in type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: New methods of beta-cell replacement have been developed to maintain excellent glycemic control, improve quality of life, and even eliminate insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Previously, we demonstrated that being insulin-free is the strongest motivation for accepting a newly developed therapy. Multiple allogeneic islet transplantations with immunosuppression using a human donor is the best option to be insulin-free, but the necessity for immunosuppression and donor shortage are major issues. However, these issues have been improved with scientific progress. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of patients and their families about the current progress. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of T1DM patients (n = 47) and their family members (n = 49) about newly developed therapies: single and multiple allogeneic islet transplantation, single and multiple encapsulated allogeneic islet transplantation, single and multiple xenogeneic islet transplantation, and induced pluripotent stem cell therapy. RESULTS: More than 90% of respondents wished to be insulin-free and have stable glycemic control. More than 90% of respondents accepted at least one of the new therapies. The current standard treatment multiple allogeneic islet transplantation was not well accepted or favored. CONCLUSIONS: The next generation of treatments, including xenotransplantation and induced pluripotent stem cell therapy, were more acceptable and favorable. Even though the majority of patients wish to become insulin-free, it is not sufficiently strong motivation for accepting newly developed treatments.

Concerns and hopes of patients with type 1 diabetes prior to islet cell transplantation: A content analysis.

AIMS: Islet cell transplantation can functionally cure type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness (HU), but requires immunosuppression. This study identified the lived experiences and risk/benefit considerations of patients pre-transplant. METHODS: Content analysis identified themes from four open-ended questions pre-transplant in an islet transplant clinical trial. The sample included 23 (19 female) patients, with a mean age = 48.3 and diabetes duration = 29.3 years. RESULTS: Lack of control due to diabetes and HU was the overarching theme pre-transplant. Four sub-themes were also identified: fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes-related complications, hopes/expectations after transplant, and transplant outcomes. Patients expressed fear of HU and long-term complications pre-transplant, and hoped islet transplant would improve diabetes management. Patients further emphasized anxiety over burdening others, and hopes of advancing research. In addition, other patients emphasized frustrations regarding the impact of HU on themselves, such as the inability to perform activities of daily living. Many patients were primarily worried about immunosuppressive side effects rather than islet transplant success. CONCLUSIONS: Patients viewed islet transplantation as a means to gain autonomy and control over their lives. They desired reduced anxiety associated with HU, despite concerns over immunosuppressive side-effects. These findings need confirmation, but may help to further improve patient education and patient-provider communication.

Surgical outcomes after total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to review surgical outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation (TP/IAT) for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: All pediatric patients (≤18 years old) undergoing TP/IAT over a 10-year period (December 2002-June 2012) were identified for inclusion in a single-center, observational cohort study. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify pertinent preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data, including narcotic usage, insulin requirements, etiology of pancreatitis, previous operative interventions, operative times, islet cell yields, duration of hospital stay, and overall quality of life. Quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 health questionnaire. RESULTS: Fourteen pediatric patients underwent TP/IAT for the treatment of CP at the University of Cincinnati with a mean age of 15.9 years (range, 14-18) and a mean body mass index of 21.8 kg/m(2) (range, 14-37). Of the patients, 50% (n = 7) were male and 29% had undergone previous pancreatic operations (1 each of Whipple, Puestow, Frey, and Berne procedures). Etiology of pancreatitis was idiopathic for 57% (n = 8); the remainder had identified genetic mutations predisposing to pancreatitis (CFTR, n = 4; SPINK1, n = 1; PRSS1, n = 1). Mean operative time was 532 minutes (range, 360-674) with an average hospital duration of stay of 16 days (range, 7-37). Islet cell isolation resulted in mean islet cell equivalents (IEQ) of 500,443 in patients without previous pancreatic surgery versus 413,671 IEQ in patients with prior pancreatic surgery (P = .12). Median patient follow-up was 9 months from surgery (range, 1-78). Preoperatively, patients required on average 32.7 morphine equivalent mg per day (MEQ), which improved to 13.9 MEQ at most recent follow-up. Eleven patients (79%) were narcotic independent. None of the patients were diabetic preoperatively. All of the patients were discharged after the operation with scheduled insulin requirements (mean, 17 U/d). This requirement decreased to a mean of 10.1 U/d at most recent follow-up visit. Four patients (29%) progressed to insulin independence. All patients in this series achieved stable glycemic control postoperatively and there was no incidence of "brittle" diabetes. Quality-of-life surveys showed improvement in all tested modules. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the largest series examining TP/IAT in the pediatric population. Pediatric patients benefitted from TP/IAT with a decrease in postoperative narcotic requirements, stable glycemic control, and improved quality of life.

Xenotransplantation of cells for diabetes: is there a good acceptance rate among Spanish adolescents?

INTRODUCTION: The transplantation of pancreatic islets from animals as a treatment for diabetes mellitus could help with the current diabetes problem. Considerable advances have been made in recent years, with recent publications reporting improved conditions for carrying out clinical trials using porcine islets in humans with type 1 diabetes. Our objectives were (1) to analyze the acceptance of cell xenotransplantation for diabetes among Spanish adolescents and (2) to determine the psychosocial variables that might affect their attitudes and its relationship with other types of donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Random sampling was carried out among secondary school students in Spanish Schools. All subjects completed a validated questionnaire evaluating the acceptance of pancreatic islet xenotransplantation together with psychosocial aspects. Questionnaire completion was anonymous and self-administered. Student t test and the chi-square test were used for statistics. RESULTS: The total number of respondents surveyed was 3633, and the mean age of the respondents was 11 ± 18 years. Most of the respondents (62%; n = 2195) would accept cells of animal origin if they suffered diabetes, 28% (n = 1005) were unsure, and 10% (n = 340) were against xenotransplantation. There is no connection with sex, age/year of study, or country. A high level of acceptance of animal cells was found among those who had a favorable attitude toward deceased organ donation and the xenotransplantation of solid organs and animal tissues (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among Spanish adolescents, there was a good level of acceptance of the idea of using animal cells as a treatment for diabetes mellitus. Therefore, it would be beneficial to increase the information provided about these matters in secondary education to improve awareness further, as part of the general human organ donation and transplantation promotion campaigns.

Pig islet xenotransplantation acceptance in a Latin-American diabetic population.

Progress in porcine islet xenotransplantation has been accompanied by studies on acceptance of this new procedure by patients, health professionals or the general public. Such studies have not been done in the Latin-American population. We conducted a questionnaire in 108 diabetes patients (insulin-dependent, n = 53; insulin-independent, n = 55) in a public hospital in Argentina. The questions addressed the general perception of the xenotransplant procedure and specific items related to the outcome (achieving insulin independence, improvement in metabolic control, delay in emergence of diabetic complications, need for repeat procedures, potential of transfer of infectious viruses, association with psychological problems, and anticipated success in relation to achieving a cure). Eighty-six (79%) of the patients accepted islet xenotransplantation; this incidence was not different for insulin-dependent or insulin-independent patients, patients with or without complications, or patients with good or poor metabolic control. Also, over 75% of patients accepted the procedure if this is only associated with a reduction in insulin requirement, if the procedure just delays but not prevents the onset of complications, or if the procedure needs to be performed every 6 months. Fifty-seven percent of patients indicated acceptance even if the potential transmission of a virus infection cannot be completely ruled out: this outcome was not affected by the outbreak of the H1N1 flu epidemic during the conduct of this study. Forty percent of patients indicated that living with porcine cells in their body could give psychological problems. We conclude that this population of Latin-American diabetic patients shows a high acceptance rate of a porcine islet xenotransplantation product.

Patient-reported outcomes following islet cell or pancreas transplantation (alone or after kidney) in Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.

AIMS: For selected individuals with complex Type 1 diabetes, pancreatic islet transplantation (IT) offers the potential of excellent glycaemic control without significant hypoglycaemia, balanced by the need for ongoing systemic immunosuppression. Increasingly, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered alongside biomedical outcomes as a measure of transplant success. PROs in IT have not previously been compared directly with the closest alternate treatment option, pancreas transplant alone (PTA) or pancreas after kidney (PAK). METHODS: We used a Population, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes (PICO) strategy to search Scopus and screened 314 references for inclusion. RESULTS: Twelve studies [including PRO assessment of PAK, PTA, islet-after kidney (IAK) and islet transplant alone (ITA); n = 7-205] used a total of nine specified and two unspecified PRO measures. Results were mixed but identified some benefits which remained apparent up to 36 months post-transplant, including improvements in fear of hypoglycaemia, as well as some aspects of diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL) and general health status. Negative outcomes included short-term pain associated with the procedure, immunosuppressant side effects and depressed mood associated with loss of graft function. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed results may be attributable to limited sample sizes. Also, some PRO measures may lack sensitivity to detect actual changes, as they exclude issues and domains of life likely to be important for QoL post-transplantation and when patients may no longer perceive themselves to have diabetes. Thus, the full impact of islet/pancreas transplantation (alone or after kidney) on QoL is unknown. Furthermore, no studies have assessed patient satisfaction, which may highlight further advantages and disadvantages of transplantation.

Improved long-term health-related quality of life after islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most important outcomes to measure effectiveness of an intervention, especially for islet transplantation in which benefits should outweigh risks of long-term immunosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of islet transplantation and to outline possible influential factors. METHODS: Forty islet transplant recipients who completed 344 Health Status Questionnaires (HSQ 2.0) and 384 Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaires (DQoL) between 2000 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Assessments were analyzed in pretransplantation period, then every 3 months after the first infusion for 18 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up posttransplantation was 40.8+/-21.9 months (9-72 months). RESULTS: Sustained improvement in DQoL-impact score was observed at all time-points posttransplantation. Similarly, worry and satisfaction scales were significantly better than pretransplant evaluation for most time-points. Four of eight HSQ 2.0 scales demonstrated a significant improvement at some time-points. Longitudinal analysis, after adjustments for potential confounding factors, showed significantly sustained improvement in impact scale up to 72 months. Longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and occurrence of adverse events had negative effects on HRQoL. Single islet infusion or islet after kidney transplant recipients showed the lowest values in HSQ 2.0. In contrast, subjects on exenatide therapy had significantly higher HSQ 2.0 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplantation is associated with long-term improvement in HRQoL. Exenatide usage had a positive effect whereas single islet infusion, islet after kidney transplantation, longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and adverse events had a negative impact on HRQoL scores.

Nutritional status and behavior in subjects with type 1 diabetes, before and after islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether changes of nutritional status and behavior are associated with islet transplantation (ITx) and to assess their possible mechanisms. METHODS: In this observational study, 52 subjects with type 1 diabetes, 30 of whom received ITx, underwent nutritional assessments. The study consisted of questionnaires complemented by a dietary intake recording, anthropometric measurements, and body composition analysis. Laboratory tests were also reviewed as part of the follow up. RESULTS: After ITx, significant reductions in body weight (3.7 kg; P<0.0001), body mass index (1.39 kg/m2; P<0.0001), waist circumference (3.96 cm; P=0.006), and fat weight (3.28 kg; P<0.01) were observed. The average consumption of carbohydrate and protein were also lower than pretransplant, together with some micronutrients (vitamins B12 and B6, zinc, and phosphorus). Insulin administration and changes in A1C were not associated with a significant change in anthropometric measurements. Subjects on exenatide after ITx showed significantly lower weight and body mass index than those not taking exenatide. CONCLUSIONS: ITx is associated with modifications in nutritional behavior and status. Drugs and health conditions are likely to be at least in part responsible for these changes, but a voluntary modification of eating habits by the patients also plays a role. Strict monitoring of nutritional parameters, counseling by experts in nutrition, and multivitamin/mineral supplement after ITx could be of benefit to the patients.

Improved metabolic control and quality of life in seven patients with type 1 diabetes following islet after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of glycemic control on both survival and function of transplanted kidneys in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have been recognized. METHODS: Herein, we present the clinical outcome of a single-center pilot trial of islet after kidney (IAK) transplantation in seven patients with T1DM. The immunosuppression protocol for the kidney graft was converted to sirolimus+tacrolimus regimen 6 months before islet transplantation to exclude negative effects on kidney graft function. Primary endpoint was achievement of insulin independence after transplantation. Clinical outcome, metabolic control, severe hypoglycemia, kidney function, Quality of Life (QOL) psychometric measures, and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Seven patients showed graft function with improved metabolic control (A1c, fasting glycemia, and metabolic tests) after IAK (14,779+/-3,800 IEQ/kg). One-year insulin independence was 30% with persistent graft function in 86% (C-peptide-positive). A1c reduction was 1.95+/-0.31% from baseline (P<0.0001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were observed, even after resuming insulin. The direct consequence of these benefits was a significant improvement in diabetes QOL. Adverse events included procedure-related pleural effusion (n=2), cholecystitis (n=1), and additional immunosuppression-related, all resolved without sequelae. Kidney function (by estimated glomerular filtration rate) remained stable during follow-up in six of seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplantation represents a feasible therapeutic option for patients with T1DM bearing a stable kidney allograft. Insulin independence at 1 year is lower than what reported in islet transplant alone. Nevertheless, clear benefits in terms of optimal metabolic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia are invariably present.

Quality of life after islet transplantation.

This study analyzed quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes that received islet transplantation. Twenty-three subjects were followed over 3 years. In addition to an interview, patients self-completed two standardized psychometric questionnaires, HSQ 2.0 and DQOL, before and after transplant, and scores were compared. Analysis was also adjusted for potential "confounders" such as graft dysfunction, insulin therapy and adverse events. DQOL: the Impact score significantly improved at all time points of the follow-up; satisfaction and worry scales also significantly improved at selected time points. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that reintroduction of insulin had a negative effect on all three scales, but significant improvement in Impact scale persisted even after adjusting for this factor. HSQ 2.0: only the Health Perception scale preliminarily showed significant improvement at most time points. Longitudinal analysis showed loss of significance when insulin therapy was considered. Other scores were improved only at selected time points or not affected. Bodily pain scale showed deterioration at selected times. Interview: glucose control stability, not insulin independence, was reported as the main beneficial factor influencing QOL. In conclusion, islet transplantation has a positive influence on patients' QOL, despite chronic immunosuppression side effects. Re-introduction of insulin modifies QOL outcomes.

Health-related quality of life after pancreatic islet transplantation: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic islet transplantation (PIT) has proven effective in achieving insulin independence, but to date, the impact of PIT on health-related quality of life (HRQL) has not been studied. METHODS: Ten patients who have undergone PIT at our institution were administered three HRQL questionnaires: the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and a fatigue questionnaire. HRQL was assessed before PIT, then 3, 6, and 12 months after PIT. Responses were compared by analysis of variance and paired Student's t tests. RESULTS: Hypoglycemia Fear Survey responses demonstrated that hypoglycemia-related anxiety and hypoglycemia-related behavior modification occurred less frequently after PIT (P=0.003 and 0.0001, respectively). The total scores of the hypoglycemia questionnaire were also significantly improved after PIT, from a median score of 156 points before transplantation to 55 points 3 months after PIT (P=0.004), 38 points 6 months after PIT (P=0.001), and 69 points 12 months after PIT (P=0.04). The median scores of all SF-36 components also improved after PIT. No significant changes were seen in the fatigue symptoms as assessed by the fatigue questionnaire. CONCLUSION: PIT recipients have less anxiety about the symptoms and consequences of hypoglycemia. PIT recipients also indicate that their behavior requires significantly less modification to prevent or treat hypoglycemia after PIT compared with before PIT. Further investigation is needed to determine whether PIT improves generic measures of HRQL.

Psychosocial aspects of xenotransplantation: survey in adolescent recipients of porcine islet cells.

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation is a process with several psychosocial challenges. Regarding the case of xenotransplantation, the perceived similarity between humans and pigs may be stressful. Adjustment disorders have been reported among transplantation recipients. We sought to assess the psychosocial aspects of xenotransplantation among porcine islet-cell recipients and their efforts to adapt themselves to this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients aged 14.58 +/- 7.93 who received porcine islet-cells were included. The bioartificial steel/fibrous tissue chamber method was used. All patients and their relatives were interviewed about their expectations, overall functioning, and experiences. The quality of life, enjoyment, and satisfaction scale and the hospital anxiety and depression scales were used. A 1-year follow-up was done. RESULTS: Their motivation was centered on autonomy; there were no troubles regarding the graft origin. Xenotransplantation was perceived with pragmatism, seeing pigs as an unlimited resource. The patients with best outcomes also had the greatest improvements in several quality of life areas (QOL) while the medium responders had fewer QOL improvements. The nonresponders experienced mainly frustration. Parents' concerns were not related to their children's health but to their recently gained autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to enthusiasm, the perception of animals as an unlimited source of organs may affect patient compliance; in this group, xenotransplantation was seen as using as a long-lasting drug, with chamber walls considered as a physical, immunologic, and, in certain manner, a psychological barrier.