A Portrait of Cord Blood Units Distributed for Transplantation from Canadian Blood Services' Cord Blood Bank: First Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Blood Services Cord Blood Bank (CBS CBB) was created to improve access to stem cell products for transplantation for patients across ethnic groups. An analysis of distributed units is needed to assess the effectiveness of the bank to meet the needs of patients from different ethnic groups. METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed on all cord blood units distributed from the CBS' CBB as of 30 June 2022. RESULTS: Distribution of the first 60 units based on CBS' CBB inventory has been linear over time. A similar proportion of cord blood unit (CBU) recipients were pediatric or adult. More than half of the cord blood units (56.7%) were distributed to recipients outside of Canada, and CBUs were used to treat a broad range of hematologic and immune disorders. 43.3% of distributed CBUs were of non-Caucasian ethnicity and 18% were from donors self-reporting as multi-ethnic. The mean total nucleated cell counts and total CD34+ cell counts were 1.9 ± 0.1 × 109 cells and 5.3 ± 0.5 × 106 CD34+ cells, respectively. CD34+ cells per kg (recipient weight) varied significantly between pediatric (age 0-4), adolescent (age 5-17) and adult recipients (age 18 and older) (3.1 ± 0.5, 1.4 ± 0.5 and 0.9 ± 0.07 × 105 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively). HLA matching was 6/6 (15%), 5/6 (47%) or 4/6 (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The CBS' CBB has facilitated the utilization of banked units for patients across a broad range of ages, geographic distribution, ethnicity, and diseases. Distributed units were well matched for HLA alleles and contained robust cell counts, reflecting a high-quality inventory with significant utility.

Racial disparities in access to HLA-matched unrelated donor transplants: a prospective 1312-patient analysis.

Availability of 8/8 HLA-allele matched unrelated donors (URDs) is a barrier for ethnic and racial minorities. We prospectively evaluated receipt of 8/8 HLA-allele matched URD or either 7/8 URD or cord blood (CB) transplants by patient ancestry from 2005 to 2017. Matched URDs were given priority if they were available. Of 1312 patients, 723 (55%) received 8/8 URD, 219 (17%) 7/8 URD, 319 (24%) CB, and 51 (4%) had no 7/8 or 8/8 URD or CB graft. Europeans were more likely to receive an 8/8 URD transplant than non-Europeans (67% vs 33%) and less likely to have no URD or CB graft (1% vs 9%). Southern Europeans received 8/8 URD transplants (41%) at rates similar to those of Asians (34%) and white Hispanics (35%); Africans were the least likely (18%) to undergo 8/8 URD transplantation. CB and 7/8 URDs extended transplant access to all groups. In 742 recent patients, marked racial disparity in 8/8 URD access between groups observed in earlier years persisted with only a modest increase in the percentage of 8/8 URD transplants. Of 78 recent African patients, 46% received a CB transplant and 14% had no 7/8 or 8/8 URD or CB graft. Increasing registry size has not resolved the racial disparity in URD access, which emphasizes the importance of alternative graft sources.

Prospective Evaluation of Unrelated Donor Cord Blood and Haploidentical Donor Access Reveals Graft Availability Varies by Patient Ancestry: Practical Implications for Donor Selection.

The availability of cord blood (CB) and haploidentical (haplo) donors in all patient populations is not established. We have investigated the addition of haplo-CD34+ cells to CB grafts (haplo-CBT) to speed myeloid engraftment. Thus, we have prospectively assessed CB and haplo donor availability in adult patients without 8/8 HLA-allele matched unrelated donors (URDs). Analysis of 89 patients eligible for haplo-CBT revealed 4 distinct patient groups. First, 6 patients (7% of total, 33% non-European) underwent CBT only as they had no suitable family members to type. In group 2, 49 patients (45% non-European) received haplo-CBT using the first haplo donor chosen. Group 3 (n = 21, 76% non-European) underwent CBT with/without haplo. In this group, the first haplo donor chosen failed clearance in 20 patients and transplantation was too urgent to permit donor evaluation in 1. Fifty-three haplo donors were evaluated (2 to 6 per patient) for 21 group 3 patients, and 43 of 53 (81%) haplos failed clearance for predominantly medical and/or psychosocial reasons. Group 4, (n = 13, 85% non-European with a high median weight of 96 kilograms) had no CB grafts with/without no haplo donors. Overall, African patients had the worst donor availability with only 65% having a suitable CB graft and only 44% having a suitable haplo donor. Additionally, in non-European patients, a greater number of haplos required evaluation/patient to secure a suitable haplo graft. Although these data should be confirmed in a larger study, it suggests that there are barriers to the availability of both CB and haplo grafts in adult patients without 8/8 URDs, especially in those with African ancestry, and has multiple practical implications for patient management.

Identification of a 10/10 matched donor for patients with an uncommon haplotype is unlikely.

BACKGROUND: Despite over 6 million subjects contributing to the National Marrow Donor Program human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype frequency reference data (HFD), haplotypes cannot be predicted from the HLA assignments of some patients searching for an unrelated donor (URD) in the Be The Match Registry®. We aimed to determine the incidence of these patient searches and whether haplotypes lacking from the HFD can be found among the low-resolution typed URD pool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: New NMDP searches with uncommon patient haplotypes (UPH), defined as a lack of haplotype pairs in any single ethnic group in the HFD based upon HLA-A˜C˜B˜DRB1˜DQB1, were identified. Each search had up to 20 potential 10/10 or 8/8 URDs typed to determine the likelihood of an allele match. RESULTS: The incidence of patient searches without haplotype pairs in a single ethnic group in the HFD was 1.2% (N=144 out of 12,172) and a majority of these patients (117; 81%) had one uncommon haplotype previously uncharacterized in the HFD. Non-White patients had the highest incidence of UPH. Importantly, no patients with UPH had a 10/10 URD identified. The transplant rate among UPH patients was 15%, and a majority of these patients utilized cord blood units as their transplant stem cell source. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the HLA HFD that informs the HapLogic matching algorithm is thorough as UPH patient searches were infrequent. Since such patients are highly unlikely to have a fully 10/10 matched URD identified, this study supports the identification of alternative stem cell sources including cord blood or a mismatched URD early in the search process.

Cord Blood Banking in the Arab World: Current Status and Future Developments.

Umbilical cord blood transplants are now used to treat numerous types of immune- and blood-related disorders and genetic diseases. Cord blood (CB) banks play an important role in these transplants by processing and storing CB units. In addition to their therapeutic potential, these banks raise ethical and regulatory questions, especially in emerging markets in the Arab world. In this article, the authors review CB banking in five countries in the region, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, selected for their different CB banking policies and initiatives. In assessing these case studies, the authors present regional trends and issues, including religious perspectives, policies, and demographic risk factors. This research suggests strong incentives for increasing the number of CB units that are collected from and available to Arab populations. In addition, the deficit in knowledge concerning public opinion and awareness in the region should be addressed to ensure educated decision-making.

Importance of donor ethnicity/race matching in unrelated adult and cord blood allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant.

Donor race matching (both recipient and donor belonging to the same race) might be a factor in outcomes of donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). A total of 858 patients who underwent umbilical cord blood (UCB) (475 patients: 202 double UCB and 273 single UCB) or unrelated donor (URD) (383 patients) alloHCT between January 1995 and December 2010 were studied. Most patients were Caucasian (87%), followed by Asians (4%), African Americans (3%), Hispanics (3%), mixed race (3%) and American Indians (< 1%). Caucasians constituted 88% of the donor grafts; Caucasians were the most common race of the donor grafts among all races except for Asians. As a result, Caucasians were much more likely to have a race-matched donor than ethnic minorities (91% vs. 33%, p < 0.01). Donor race matching did not affect non-relapse mortality, relapse, acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease or overall survival. Acknowledging the limitations of this study (mainly, self-reported race information and small number of ethnic minorities), at present there are no data supporting that donor race should be considered a factor in donor selection.

Ethnically mismatched cord blood transplants in African Americans: the Saint Louis Cord Blood Bank experience.

BACKGROUND: For ethnic minority patients where a suitably matched BM or peripheral blood donor is frequently unavailable, cord blood offers an opportunity for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Focused recruitment of ethnic minorities for cord blood donation has been proposed as the preferred strategy to improve access for minority recipients to cord blood for transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate cord blood characteristics for Caucasian and African American donors and the success of ethnically mismatched UC blood transplantation in African American recipients. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis was performed comparing the characteristics of 556 cord blood units from African American and Caucasian donors. The outcomes of 18 African American ethnically mismatched transplant recipients were compared with a paired sample of 18 ethnically matched Caucasian recipients. RESULTS: The fraction of collected units meeting acceptability criteria from African Americans was significantly lower compared with Caucasians (P = <0.0001). Additionally, African Americans had a significantly lower post-processing total nucleated cell count (TNC) compared with Caucasians (P=0.007) but there were no other significant differences in conventionally measured product characteristics. In the transplant analysis, there was no difference in overall survival at 1 year (P=0.85) or time to neutrophil engraftment (P=0.92) between the two patient populations. DISCUSSION: At comparable levels of TNC dose and HLA matching, the use of ethnically mismatched UC blood units as a source for allogeneic unrelated transplant can result in successful transplant outcomes for African American patients.

Ethnicity, equity and public benefit: a critical evaluation of public umbilical cord blood banking in Australia.

Over the past decade umbilical cord blood (UCB) has been increasingly used as a source of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for patients who require a HSC transplant but do not have an HLA-matched donor. It was anticipated that using UCB as an alternative source of HSCs would increase the chance of finding a donor, particularly for the otherwise underrepresented ethnic minority groups. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Australian public UCB banks to increase the ethnic diversity of available HSC donations, this paper analyses the ethnic diversity of the Sydney Cord Blood Bank (SCBB), comparing this diversity to that of the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry (ABMDR). It also examines the ethnic diversity of those patients who, after requesting a haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the 2-year period between 2003 and 2005, managed to find a suitably matched bone marrow or UCB donor. We show that the ethnic mix of donors to the SCBB has remained generally broad in source, is comparative to the Australian population, and is more diverse than the ABMDR. This, however, may still not be sufficient to substantially increase the likelihood of finding a donor for some ethnic minority groups.

Can routine commercial cord blood banking be scientifically and ethically justified?

BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE: Umbilical cord blood--the blood that remains in the placenta after birth--can be collected and stored frozen for years. A well-accepted use of cord blood is as an alternative to bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation to siblings or to unrelated recipients; women can donate cord blood for unrelated recipients to public banks. However, private banks are now open that offer expectant parents the option to pay a fee for the chance to store cord blood for possible future use by that same child (autologous transplantation).