Challenging the dogma of the healthy heterozygote: Implications for newborn screening policies and practices.

Heterozygous (carrier) status for an autosomal recessive condition is traditionally considered to lack significance for an individual's health, but this assumption has been challenged by a growing body of evidence. Carriers of several autosomal recessive disorders and some X-linked diseases are potentially at risk for the pathology manifest in homozygotes. This minireview provides an overview of the literature regarding health risks to carriers of two common autosomal recessive conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel: sickle cell disease [sickle cell trait (SCT)] and cystic fibrosis (CF). We also consider and comment on bioethical and policy implications for newborn blood screening (NBS). Health risks for heterozygotes, while relatively low for individuals, are often influenced by intrinsic (e.g., other genomic variants or co-morbidities) and extrinsic (environmental) factors, which present opportunities for personalized genomic medicine and risk counseling. They create a special challenge, however, for developing screening/follow-up policies and for genetic counseling, particularly after identification and reporting of heterozygote status through NBS. Although more research is needed, this minireview of the SCT and CF literature to date leads us to propose that blanket terms such as "healthy heterozygotes" or "unaffected carriers" should be superseded in communications about NBS results, in favor of a more nuanced paradigm of setting expectations for health outcomes with "genotype-to-risk." In the molecular era of NBS, it remains clear that public health needs to become better prepared for the full range of applied genetics.

Newborn screening system: Safety, technology, advocacy.

Newborn screening (NBS) is more than 50 years old and has proven to be a powerful and successful public health system. NBS must be regarded as a system and not simply as a test. We need to work as a community to improve the culture of safety for the NBS system and thereby to reduce the risk of babies being missed by the NBS system. Adding new technologies will not prevent system failures; that will require adherence to the culture of safety. Some have argued that every newborn should have their genome sequenced at birth and this sequencing could be part of NBS. However, NBS has depended on biomarker phenotypes throughout its history and our understanding of the relationships between genotype and phenotype is imperfect. Therefore, we should avoid being seduced by genomic sequencing technology and continue to focus on phenotypic biomarkers in NBS.

[Half a century of newborn screening in Spain: Evolution of ethical, legal and social issues (ELSIs). Part III, social issues.] / Medio siglo de cribado neonatal en España: evolución de los aspectos éticos, legales y sociales (AELS). Parte III, aspectos sociales.

Decision making for the development of newborn screening programs is based on not only medical but also social concerns and involves different stakeholders. Part III of the article focuses on their role in the governance of the programs. First of all, we consider the proactive role that health authorities has played in the evolution to an evidentiary model of policy development currently based on evidence, just as in the preparation of an expert, impartial and transparent opinion on health policy and its coordination with the national health system. And, in accordance with this evidence and with the consensus, health autorities following quality criteria have made an attempt to achieve a more homogeneous approach of the neonatal screening program throughout the territory. Secondly, we address the role of several scientific and professional societies in newborn screening. Among them, it deserves to be mentioned the Spanish Society for Clinical Chemistry, currently Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), and its Commission of inborn errors of metabolism and the Spanish Society for Newborn Screening (AECNE), which since 1985 and for thirty three years collected the activity of newborn screening centers and established a forum for debate, sharing of knowledge and cooperation among screening centers and with health authorities. Since 1999, the Spanish Society for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (AECOM) exercises an important activity in the field of diagnosis treatment and follow up of patients. Finally, we consider the role of families and the psychosocial aspects of the programme, and the associative activity of patient organizations. In 1990 the Spanish federation of PKU and other disorders (FAEPKU) was found, renamed currently as The Spanish Federation of Inherited Metabolic Diseases; together with the Spanish Federation for Rare Diseases (FEDER), found in 1999, they both have clearly contributed to the patient's empowerment, supporting research and education and establishing a network of cooperation and support for patients and their families. Patient organizations collaborate with health authorities but they have not participated in policy decision making yet. During this half century, the evolution of newborn screening programs have been characterized for a spirit of improvement, by including the development of ethical, legal and social issues. Important technological challenges lie ahead and it will be necessary to know how to use them efficiently, proportionally and fairly in the best interest of newborns and by extension of their family and society.

Las bases para la toma de decisiones acerca del desarrollo de los programas de cribado de Salud Pública no son exclusivamente médicas, sino también sociales. En esta parte III del artículo se contemplan los actores que intervienen en la gobernanza de los programas, cómo son las autoridades sanitarias, las sociedades científicas y profesionales, así como las familias y su movimiento asociativo. En primer lugar, se analiza el papel de las instituciones/autoridades sanitarias en el desarrollo de los programas y en la evolución del modelo para la toma de decisiones, hasta el actual basado en la evidencia, así como en la elaboración de una opinión experta, imparcial y transparente en política sanitaria y su coordinación en el marco del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS). Y, de acuerdo con dicha evidencia y con el consenso, las instituciones/autoridades sanitarias han tratado de conseguir un abordaje más homogéneo y conforme a criterios de calidad del programa de cribado neonatal en todo el territorio. A continuación, se aborda el papel de las sociedades científicas y profesionales, especialmente de la Sociedad Española de Química Clínica (actualmente Sociedad Española de Medicina de Laboratorio (SEQCML), a través de la Comisión de Errores Congénitos del Metabolismo, y de la Asociación Española de Cribado Neonatal (AECNE), que desde 1985 y durante 33 años recogieron los datos de actividad de los centros de cribado y establecieron un foro de debate, intercambio de conocimientos y colaboración entre ellos y con las autoridades sanitarias. De ellas, destaca el importante papel de la Asociación Española de Errores Congénitos del Metabolismo (AECOM) desde 1999 en el diagnóstico, seguimiento y tratamiento de los pacientes. Finalmente, se contempla el papel de las familias y los aspectos psicosociales del programa, así como la evolución del movimiento asociativo, con especial mención a la fundación en 1990 de la Federación Española de PKU y otros trastornos (FAEPKU) (que pasó después a llamarse la Federación Española de Enfermedades Metabólicas Hereditarias) y en 1999 de la Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras (FEDER). Estas asociaciones han contribuido notablemente al empoderamiento de los pacientes, a apoyar la investigación y la formación y a establecer una red de colaboración y soporte para los pacientes y sus familias. Y aunque están en contacto y colaboran con las autoridades sanitarias, hasta el momento no han participado en la elaboración de decisiones y en la gobernanza de los programas. El espíritu de superación y mejora ha marcado la evolución de los programas durante este medio siglo al incluir el desarrollo de sus aspectos éticos, legales y sociales. Se avecinan desafíos tecnológicos importantes y habrá que saber utilizarlos con eficiencia, proporcionalidad y justicia en el mejor interés del niño y, por extensión, de la familia y de la sociedad.

Regulatory landscape of providing information on newborn screening to parents across Europe.

Newborn screening (NBS) is an important part of public healthcare systems in many countries. The provision of information to parents about NBS is now recognised as an integral part of the screening process. Informing parents on all aspects of screening helps to achieve the benefits, promote trust and foster support for NBS. Therefore, policies and guidelines should exist to govern how the information about NBS is provided to parents, taking into account evidence-based best practices. The purpose of our survey was to explore whether any legally binding provisions, guidelines or recommendations existed pertaining to the provision of information about NBS to parents across Europe. Questions were designed to determine the regulatory process of when, by whom and how parents should be informed about screening. Twenty-seven countries participated in the survey. The results indicated that most countries had some sort of legal framework or guidelines for the provision of information to parents. However, only 37% indicated that the provision of information was required prenatally. The majority of countries were verbally informing parents with the aid of written materials postnatally, just prior to sample collection. Information was provided by a neonatologist, midwife or nurse. A website dedicated to NBS was available for 67% of countries and 89% had written materials about NBS for parents. The survey showed that there is a lack of harmonisation among European countries in the provision of information about NBS and emphasised the need for more comprehensive guidelines at the European level.

[Susceptibility genetics of common conditions in clinical practice]. / Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes.

The genetic tests for "non-rare thrombophilias" (TNR) were introduced into clinical setting immediately after the identification of genetic variants in the mid-90s to predict and prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although being a rare example of a genetic test of susceptibility for complex diseases that has been integrated in medical routine, it is the most widespread post-natal genetics inquiry in France nowadays. Yet, determining whom to test and how to use the results is still controversial. This article outlines the trajectory of its clinical regulation and illustrates the importance of the context of use to understand its diffusion. This analysis is intended to feed a more general reflection on the issues raised by the clinical integration of genetic surveys for common diseases, particularly with regard to the clinical utility of a test (statistical vs. biological), the subjects to be tested (the case index and/or her/his relatives), and the criteria underlying access to these tests (modalities of medico-economic assessment).

TITLE: Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes. ABSTRACT: Introduit au lendemain de l'identification des « thrombophilies non rares ¼ (TNR), au milieu des années 1990 afin de prédire et de prévenir la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV), le bilan génétique pour ces thrombophilies est un exemple assez rare de test génétique de susceptibilité pour une maladie complexe, à avoir franchi le pas d'un véritable usage de routine en clinique. Bien que ce test soit le plus répandu des tests de génétique post-natale en France, son usage (À qui proposer le test ? Que faire des résultats ?) fait encore l'objet de débats. Cet article analyse la trajectoire de régulation clinique de ce test et illustre l'importance du contexte spécifique d'usage pour comprendre sa diffusion. Cette analyse vise à nourrir une réflexion plus générale sur les enjeux que pose l'intégration clinique des tests génétiques pour les maladies communes, en considérant notamment les modalités de définition de l'utilité clinique d'un test (statistique versus biologique), des sujets du test (le cas index versus ses apparentés), et des critères en sous-tendant l'accès (modalités des calculs médico-économiques).

Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.

Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.

introduce nationwide pulse oximetry screening for the detection of critical congenital heart disease and other hypoxaemic conditions in the newborn.

The mortality risk for infants with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) unrecognised at the time of birth is high. Pulse oximetry has been utilised as a screening tool for the detection of these anomalies in the newborn as the majority will have a degree of hypoxaemia. This screening strategy has a moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity for the detection of CCHD, and a low false-positive rate. Respiratory and infective diseases are responsible for a large number of positive test results. The early recognition of these diseases can also improve health outcomes. Different approaches have been taken to introduce screening, ranging from hospital-led initiatives to mandatory state-wide policies. A study conducted in New Zealand demonstrated that sector-led screening initiatives are unlikely to result in equitable outcomes. In this midwifery-led maternity setting a nationwide pulse oximetry screening programme with adequate human and material resources should be introduced.

Newborn screening for SMA in Southern Belgium.

Approval was recently granted for a new treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Given that the treatment is effective when administered early and the societal burden of SMA-related disability, the implementation of a newborn screening program is warranted. We describe the stepwise process that led us to launch a newborn screening program for SMA in Southern Belgium. Different political, ethical, and clinical partners were informed about this project and were involved in its governance, as were genetic and screening labs. We developed and validated a newborn screening method to specifically recognize homozygous deletions of exon 7 in the SMN1 gene. Subsequently, a 3-year pilot study has been recently initiated in one Belgian neonatal screening laboratory to cover 17.000 neonates per year. Coverage extension to all of Southern Belgium to screen 55.000 babies each year is underway.

The Legal Dimensions of Genomic Sequencing in Newborn Screening.

The possible integration of genomic sequencing (including whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing) into the three contexts addressed in this special report-state-mandated screening programs, clinical care, and direct-to-consumer services-raises related but distinct legal issues. This essay will outline the legal issues surrounding the integration of genomic sequencing into state newborn screening programs, parental rights to refuse and access sequencing for their newborns in clinical and direct-to-consumer care, and privacy-related legal issues attending the use of sequencing in newborns.

Decline of Seroprevalence and Incidence of Congenital Toxoplasmosis Despite Changing Prevention Policy-Three Decades of Cord-blood Screening in North-western Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of prospective data, there is an ongoing debate about the need for screening and prevention programs for congenital toxoplasmosis in Europe. Accordingly, individual countries have chosen different public health strategies. METHODS: A cord-blood screening program for congenital toxoplasmosis was established in 1982 in obstetric units of hospitals in North-Western Switzerland. Samples were tested for specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM, and after 1992 also for IgA antibodies. Suspicious test results triggered additional investigations to identify children with congenital toxoplasmosis. RESULTS: From 1982 to 2015, 119,166 cord-blood samples have been collected and analyzed for the presence of Toxoplasma-specific antibodies. Although maternal age rose from 28.2 to 32.2 years during this period, a decrease of seroprevalence from 53% to 20% was observed. The incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis decreased by 85% (from 0.08% to 0.012%) and remained low despite abandoning prevalent nonsystematic screening during pregnancy in Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS: Our data document a steady decline of both Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and congenital toxoplasmosis incidence in Switzerland even after abolition of the nonsystematic prenatal screening a decade ago. The data support abandoning toxoplasmosis screening programs in low-incidence, high-income countries such as Switzerland.

Association of US State Implementation of Newborn Screening Policies for Critical Congenital Heart Disease With Early Infant Cardiac Deaths.

IMPORTANCE: In 2011, critical congenital heart disease was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns, but whether state implementation of screening policies has been associated with infant death rates is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there was an association between implementation of state newborn screening policies for critical congenital heart disease and infant death rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study with group-level analyses. A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted using the National Center for Health Statistics' period linked birth/infant death data set files for 2007-2013 for 26 546 503 US births through June 30, 2013, aggregated by month and state of birth. EXPOSURES: State policies were classified as mandatory or nonmandatory (including voluntary policies and mandates that were not yet implemented). As of June 1, 2013, 8 states had implemented mandatory screening policies, 5 states had voluntary screening policies, and 9 states had adopted but not yet implemented mandates. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Numbers of early infant deaths (between 24 hours and 6 months of age) coded for critical congenital heart disease or other/unspecified congenital cardiac causes for each state-month birth cohort. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, there were 2734 deaths due to critical congenital heart disease and 3967 deaths due to other/unspecified causes. Critical congenital heart disease death rates in states with mandatory screening policies were 8.0 (95% CI, 5.4-10.6) per 100 000 births (n = 37) in 2007 and 6.4 (95% CI, 2.9-9.9) per 100 000 births (n = 13) in 2013 (for births by the end of July); for other/unspecified cardiac causes, death rates were 11.7 (95% CI, 8.6-14.8) per 100 000 births in 2007 (n = 54) and 10.3 (95% CI, 5.9-14.8) per 100 000 births (n = 21) in 2013. Early infant deaths from critical congenital heart disease through December 31, 2013, decreased by 33.4% (95% CI, 10.6%-50.3%), with an absolute decline of 3.9 (95% CI, 3.6-4.1) deaths per 100 000 births after states implemented mandatory screening compared with prior periods and states without screening policies. Early infant deaths from other/unspecified cardiac causes declined by 21.4% (95% CI, 6.9%-33.7%), with an absolute decline of 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.8) deaths per 100 000 births. No significant decrease was associated with nonmandatory screening policies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Statewide implementation of mandatory policies for newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease was associated with a significant decrease in infant cardiac deaths between 2007 and 2013 compared with states without these policies.

Newborn drug testing practices in Iowa birthing hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Federal law mandates states to have policies and procedures to identify newborns exposed to maternal substance use during pregnancy. National guidelines for newborn drug testing are lacking; therefore, procedures are variable and determined by state law and local practices. In Iowa, maternal substance use during pregnancy is considered child abuse and must be reported.The objective of this study was to identify newborn drug testing policies and procedures among birthing hospitals in Iowa. METHODS: This was a cross sectional survey of all birthing hospitals in Iowa identified via the Statewide Perinatal Care Program. An electronic survey was sent to the representative at each affiliated hospital. RESULTS: Sixty-nine of 76 hospitals completed the survey for a 90.8% response rate. Newborn drug testing is ordered in 97.1% of responding hospitals with most testing 25% or less of newborns annually. The majority utilized a risk assessment tool (89.6%), although many (62.7%) also allowed for provider discretion. No hospital performed universal testing of all newborns. 86.6% of hospitals reported all positive newborn drug test results including illicit and/or prescription drugs to child protective services. 35.0% of hospitals notified mothers of the report and 45.5% offered substance abuse services and/or treatment to the mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Most Iowa birthing hospitals perform newborn drug testing and report all positive test results to child protective services. The majority use risk assessment tools. Maternal notification practices and referral for substance use disorder treatment are suboptimal and represent an area for future improvement.

Using State Birth Defects Registries to Evaluate Regional Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening.

BACKGROUND: Most states have now passed legislation mandating pulse oximetry for all newborns, or have promulgated regulations or guidelines to encourage use of routine pulse oximetry. State-based birth defects registries may be well positioned to track and evaluate critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening coverage and outcomes. This purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the proportion of cases detected by screening, (2) health services use by children with CCHDs during the first year of life, and (3) mortality outcomes. METHODS: Records of children born in 2012 to 2013 with any of seven CCHD lesions were identified in New England birth defects databases. Information was abstracted from each child's medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to report results. RESULTS: From nearly 160,000 live births, 208 CCHD diagnoses were noted in the records of 157 children. Screening was noted in 67% of records of confirmed cases of CCHDs. Data completeness varied by state; for example, information was available regarding prenatal diagnosis in 91% of records and age at first surgery in 85% among states with active surveillance compared with 35% and 75%, respectively, with passive surveillance. Documentation of screening results in medical records was inconsistent. The one year survival was 85% (77/91). CONCLUSION: Birth defects surveillance systems can provide information on outcomes for infants with CCHDs. However, information varies by surveillance method and by hospital practices. Engaging hospitals in standardizing recording procedures and enhancing training and quality control could increase the value of birth defects registries records in assessing outcomes for children identified through CCHD screening. Birth Defects Research 109:1414-1422, 2017.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Reporting Newborn Audiologic Results to State EHDI Programs.

OBJECTIVES: All US states and territories have an Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program to facilitate early hearing evaluation and intervention for infants who are deaf or hard of hearing. To ensure efficient coordination of care, the state EHDI programs rely heavily on audiologists' prompt reporting of a newborn's hearing status. Several states have regulations requiring mandatory reporting of a newborn's hearing status. This is an important public health responsibility of pediatric audiologists. Reasons for failing to report vary. DESIGN: The Early Hearing Detection and Intervention-Pediatric Audiology Links to Services (EHDI) facility survey was used to inform reporting compliance of audiology facilities throughout the United States. The survey was disseminated via articles, newsletters, and call-to-action notices to audiologists. RESULTS: Among 1024 facilities surveyed, 88 (8.6%) reported that they did not report newborn's hearing findings to their state EHDI program. Not knowing how to report to the state EHDI program was the most frequently chosen reason (60%). However, among the 936 facilities that were compliant with the reporting requirements, 51 estimated that they reported less than two-third of all hearing evaluation results (5.4%). Some facilities did not report a normal-hearing result and some failed to report because they assumed another facility would report the hearing results. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results indicated that audiologists were compliant reporting hearing results to the state EHDI programs. However, there is room for improvement. Regular provider outreach and training by the state EHDI program is necessary to ensure those who are not reporting will comply and to clarify reporting requirements for those who are already compliant.

Evolution of Italian Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the state of implementation of the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Italy and to determine the effect that an ad hoc legislation may have on the percentage of infants screened for detection of hearing impairment in nurseries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Italian Newborn Hearing Screening data were obtained during four national surveys (years 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2011). The screening rates obtained by the Regions which adopted or did not adopt a legislation to increase the newborns' coverage were compared. RESULTS: In 2011, the average coverage rate was 78.3%, but in 12 out of 20 Regions it exceeded 95%. Coverage rate was greater in Regions that implemented an ad hoc legislation compared to Regions that did not. As a matter of fact, Regions which passed the legislation screened more than 95% of infants, whereas Regions without legislation reported a mean screening rate of nearly 67% of newborns. CONCLUSION: Current results seem to confirm that a specific legislation might have a decisive effect on the increase of rate of coverage of newborn hearing screenings.

Outcomes From a Hearing-Targeted Cytomegalovirus Screening Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common congenital infection and nongenetic cause of congenital sensorineural hearing loss in the United States. Utah was the first state to pass legislation mandating CMV screening for newborns who fail newborn hearing screening (NBHS). The study objective was to present outcomes of hearing-targeted CMV screening and determine factors predicting CMV screening. METHODS: We used Utah Department of Health HiTrack and Vital Records databases to examine CMV screening from 509 infants who failed NBHS in the 24 months after implementation of the Utah legislation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of compliance with CMV screening and diagnostic hearing evaluation. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of infants who never passed hearing screening underwent CMV screening. Fourteen of 234 infants tested within 21 days were CMV positive; 6 (42.9%) had hearing loss. Seventy-seven percent of eligible infants completed a diagnostic hearing evaluation within 90 days of birth. Compliance with CMV screening was associated with sociodemographic factors, time since the law was enacted, and NBHS protocol. Infants born after the legislation showed greater odds of achieving timely diagnostic hearing evaluation than infants born before the law. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating CMV screening into an established NBHS program is a viable option for the identification of CMV in infants failing NBHS. The addition of CMV testing can help a NBHS program attain timely audiological diagnostics within 90 days, an important early hearing detection and intervention milestone.

International differences in the evaluation of conditions for newborn bloodspot screening: a review of scientific literature and policy documents.

Despite international adoption of newborn bloodspot screening (DBS), no two countries' screening programs are the same. This article aims to understand what factors influence DBS decision-making criteria and how conditions are assessed against them. In doing so, it offers unique insights into the international landscape of DBS. A systematic review on DBS criteria in scientific literature was first undertaken. Through this, five topics were identified for consideration when analyzing DBS decision-making. Using these five topics as a template, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on DBS in policy documents of eight countries. Programs are using different approaches to explore the same policy issues, including: the beneficiary of DBS, definition of criteria, the way conditions are assessed, level of evidence required, and recommendations after assessment. These differences have the potential to result in increased disparity across DBS internationally. Ultimately, governments need to decide on their role and develop an approach to DBS decision-making in line with this role. The analyses presented in this article highlight that despite programs' commonalities, no one 'DBS decision-making solution' exists. Understanding the different approaches to decision-making within the literature and policy settings, provides an objective starting point for structured decision-making approaches for DBS programs.