Incidence of thromboembolic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rarely been reported. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. The primary outcome was the incidence of TEs, and the secondary outcome was the relationship between TEs and overall survival (OS) following ICI therapy. A subgroup analysis of TE incidents was performed according to the TE type and combination regimens. The I2 statistic was used to determine the heterogeneity, and funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. A total of 16,602 patients with NSCLC in 63 experimental arms were included in the analysis. The rate of TEs ranged from 0.1% to 13.8%, and the pooled overall incidence of all-grade TEs was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-4%). The pooled rate of high-grade TEs was 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%). The venous and arterial TE rates were 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%), respectively. Patients who received immunotherapy + chemoradiotherapy had the highest incidence of TEs (7%). The TE pooled rate was higher in patients treated with combined ICIs than in those treated with mono ICIs (4% vs. 2%). The OS was lower in patients with TEs than in those without TEs (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02%-1.92%). The incidence of TEs in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs was reasonable. Nonetheless, clinicians must be aware of potential thrombotic complications and treat them promptly.

Utilization and safety of off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate) in a surgical population.

The aim of this study is to evaluate and describe the utilization and safety of 4F-PCC in a nonanticoagulated, surgical patient population at an academic, tertiary care center. This retrospective, single-center chart review evaluated nonanticoagulated adult patients at least 18 years of age who had at least one dose of 4F-PCC administered between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2022 for a surgical or peri-procedural indication. Hemostatic efficacy following 4F-PCC administration was the primary outcome, assessed by subsequent blood product administration and hemoglobin and hematocrit reduction. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of thrombotic events within 30 days post-4F-PCC administration, in-hospital mortality, and the length of hospital stay. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 61 patients receiving 4F-PCC for cardiac surgery and 10 patients for other intraoperative or peri-procedural indications. The mean total 4F-PCC dose was 25.0 U/kg. For the primary outcome of hemostatic efficacy, 81% of patients had excellent hemostasis; however, blood product administration was reported in 95.8% of patients post-4F-PCC. Thromboembolic events occurred in 10 (14.1%) patients and 21.1% of patients expired prior to discharge in the total cohort. Off-label 4F-PCC use in nonanticoagulated patients is reported despite a lack of robust guidance for use. Following 4F-PCC administration, hemostatic efficacy based on hemoglobin and hematocrit changes was observed; however, blood product use was frequent, and 4F-PCC administration was not without risks, including thromboembolic complications such deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and stroke. Further studies are needed to validate the off-label administration of 4F-PCC in nonanticoagulated patients.

Thromboembolic risk of carfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thrombosis represents a frequent and potentially severe complication in individuals diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). These events can be driven by both the disease as well as the therapies themselves. Overall, available evidence is inconclusive about the differential thrombogenicity of carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) and bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd). This meta-analysis compares the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE; including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE; including myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) with KRd versus VRd as primary therapy for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Out of 510 studies identified after deduplication, one randomized controlled trial and five retrospective cohort studies were included. We analyzed 2304 patients (VRd: 1380; KRd: 924) for VTE events and 2179 patients (VRd: 1316; KRd: 863) for ATE events. Lower rates of VTE were observed in the VRd group when compared with the KRd group (6.16% vs. 8.87%; odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.88; p = .01). Both treatment groups exhibited minimal ATE incidence, with no significant difference between them (0.91% vs. 1.16%; OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.24-4.20; p = .99). In view of potential biases from retrospective studies, heterogeneity of baseline population characteristics, and limited access to patient-level data (e.g., VTE risk stratification and type of thromboprophylaxis regimen used) inherent to this meta-analysis, additional research is warranted to further validate our findings and refine strategies for thrombosis prevention in MM.

Left atrial appendage occlusion: Percutaneous and surgical approaches in everyday practice.

Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Four Global Roxadustat Phase 3 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving roxadustat are unknown. Iron deficiency has been reported as a risk factor for thrombosis in the general population. METHODS: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 in patients receiving roxadustat were evaluated in this pooled analysis of four global phase 3 trials, PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, and ROCKIES. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses with matched pairs of case-control data explored the relationship between thromboembolic events and last known laboratory parameters before event onset. RESULTS: Of 2354 patients, 1026 thromboembolic events were observed in 568 patients. Baseline risk factors found included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and history of thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. Univariate case-control analyses revealed that high hemoglobin rate of rise (≥ 0.5 g/dL/week; odds ratio [OR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-4.46) showed a trend towards increased risk of thromboembolic events before week 12, and high rate of hemoglobin decline was associated with events after week 12 (< - 0.5 g/dL/week; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.68-8.27) as compared to stable hemoglobin levels (≥ - 0.1 to < 0.1 g/dL/week). Multivariate case-control analyses showed that low last known hemoglobin level (< 10 g/dL: adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.04-3.50; vs ≥ 12 g/dL) and low last known transferrin saturation (TSAT < 10%: adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.71-8.39; vs ≥ 30%) before event onset were associated with events after week 12. In patients with last known TSAT < 30%, higher roxadustat dose was associated with thromboembolic events; however, no association was observed in those with TSAT ≥ 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Among various risk factors for thromboembolic events, it is reasonable to avoid a rapid increase and decline in hemoglobin levels as well as ensure TSAT ≥ 30%, rather than increasing the roxadustat dose. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02278341, NCT02273726, NCT02052310, NCT02174731.

Roxadustat is an oral treatment for patients with anemia, or low hemoglobin levels, due to chronic kidney disease. Thromboembolic events are caused by a blood clot blocking blood vessels, and they have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This analysis evaluated risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients receiving roxadustat to treat anemia of chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis. Two different statistical approaches were used to investigate risk factors for thromboembolic events that occurred before and after 12 weeks of roxadustat treatment. We found that rapid improvement of anemia after starting roxadustat treatment may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events occurring in the first 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, severe anemia or worsening of anemia was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events after week 12. Low iron levels in the blood or greater decline of available iron in the blood from baseline were also detected as risk factors for the events after week 12, suggesting that iron supplementation is important in patients who are iron-deficient. Moreover, thromboembolic events were also associated with older age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high levels of inflammation, and having had a previous thromboembolic event or having a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Some risk factors, such as iron status and hemoglobin levels, can be changed after beginning roxadustat treatment and should be monitored and modified, as needed.

Heparin dosing in patients with Impella-supported cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Impella™ is increasingly used in cardiogenic shock. However, thromboembolic and bleeding events are frequent during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal anticoagulation regime for pMCS to prevent thromboembolism and bleedings. METHODS: This hypothesis-generating multi-center cohort study investigated 170 patients with left-Impella™ support. We (A) compared bleeding/thrombotic events in two centers with therapeutic range (TR-aPTT) activated partial thromboplastin time (60-80s) and (B) compared events of these centers with one center with intermediate range aPTT (40-60s). RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in patients' characteristics. In centers aiming at TR-aPTT, major bleeding was numerically lower with aPTT <60s within 48 h of left-Impella™ support, versus patients that achieved the aimed aPTT of ≥60s [aPTT ≥60s: 22 (37.3%) vs. aPTT<60s 14 (23.7%); Hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 (95%) CI, 0.28-1.38; p = 0.234]. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) did not differ between groups. In comparison of centers, TR-aPTT strategy showed higher major bleeding rates [TR: 8 (47.1%) vs. intermediate range: 1 (5.9%); HR, 0.06 (95%) CI, 0.01-0.45; p = 0.006]. MACCE were lower in the intermediate range aPTT group as well [TR 12 (70.6%) vs. intermediate range 5 (29.4%) HR, 0.32 (95%) CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.034]. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis showed that lowering UFH-targets in left-Impella™ supported CS patients seems to be a safe and promising strategy for reducing major bleedings without increasing MACCE. This needs to be validated in larger, randomized clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Reversal of the Anticoagulant Effect of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban in Patients with Major Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: The use of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) to treat direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding is off-label and clinical experience is limited. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of aPCC in reversing the anticoagulant effect of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients presenting with major bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult non-randomized patients was conducted at a tertiary referral medical center in the United States (US) to investigate the use of aPCC for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients presenting with major bleeding. The primary outcome was achieving clinical hemostasis according to prespecified criteria. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of thrombotic events during hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were included in the study. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was the most common site of bleeding (n = 100, 46.1%), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (n = 87, 40.1%). Clinical hemostasis was achieved in 170 patients (78.3%), and the risk of not achieving hemostasis with ICH-related bleeding was significantly higher than that of non-ICH-related bleeding (2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-4.34; p < 0.001). Eight patients not achieving hemostasis died during hospitalization, all of whom were suffering from ICH, and mortality associated with non-ICH-related bleeding was significantly lower compared with ICH-related bleeding (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events during hospitalization occurred in one patient (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of aPCC for the management of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-related major bleeding is effective in most cases and is associated with a low risk of thromboembolism.

Thromboembolism and Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy (AET) in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer (EBC): Did Treatment Evolution Change Incidence of the Adverse Event? A Meta-Analysis.

The adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) of HR+ EBC has been changing in recent years. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as an upfront strategy (or as part of a switch strategy) have been added to the choice of Tamoxifen (T) alone. Increased TE risk is well known in T-treated patients, while AIs have shown a reduced TE rate. By adding the cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6) to AIs, an increase in TE rate has been shown. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of the AETs on TE incidence. Twelve randomized phase III trials were included. Four trials evaluated the upfront strategy, 6 assessed the switch and 2 the combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The new AETs did not significantly modify or affect the rate of TE events (OR 0.847, 95% CI, 0.528-1.366, P = .489). The OR for CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET vs. ET was 3.635 (P = .002). Excluding the CDK4/6 inhibitors, the overall OR for AIs vs. T was 0.628 (P < .001), while it was 0.781 (P = .151) for switching T vs. continuing T for 5 years, and 0.52 (P < .0001) for the upfront strategies with AIs. The AIs alone or plus CDK4/6 inhibitors did not affect the rate of TE events. AIs as an upfront strategy is the safest AET, associated with the lowest TE incidence. The switch strategy increases TE rate, whereas the addition of CDK4/6 to the standard AET was shown to significantly increase TE events. The results of the currently ongoing trials with CDK4/6 inhibitors will help obtain additional data to evaluate any differences among the different CDK4/6 inhibitors and clarify the weight of TE adverse events in the benefit/risk balance of this new adjuvant strategy.

Prescribing practices of tranexamic acid for melasma: Delphi consensus from the Pigmentary Disorders Society.

Introduction There is ambiguity regarding usage of tranexamic acid for melasma in India, be it in its pre-administration evaluation, administration route, dosing or monitoring. Hence, we conducted this study to understand various tranexamic-acid prescribing patterns and provide practical guidelines. Materials and methods A Google-form-based questionnaire (25-questions) was prepared based on the key areas identified by experts from the Pigmentary Disorders Society, India and circulated to practicing dermatologists across the country. In rounds 2 and 3, the questionnaire was re-presented to the same group of experts and their opinions were sought. The results of the practitioners' survey were denoted graphically alongside, to guide them. Consensus was deemed when at least 80% of respondents chose an option. Results The members agreed that history pertaining to risk factors for thromboembolism, cardiovascular and menstrual disorders should be sought in patients being started on oral tranexamic-acid. Baseline coagulation profile should be ordered in all patients prior to tranexamic-acid and more exhaustive investigations such as complete blood count, liver function test, protein C and S in patients with high risk of thromboembolism. The preferred oral dose was 250 mg orally twice daily, which can be used alone or in combination with topical hydroquinone, kojic acid and sunscreen. Repeated dosing of tranexamic-acid may be required for those relapsing with melasma following initial tranexamic-acid discontinuation. Coagulation profile should ideally be repeated at three monthly intervals during follow-up, especially in patients with clinically higher risk of thromboembolism. Treatment can be stopped abruptly post improvement and no tapering is required. Limitation This study is limited by the fact that open-ended questions were limited to the first general survey round. Conclusion Oral tranexamic-acid provides a valuable treatment option for melasma. Frequent courses of therapy may be required to sustain results and a vigilant watch is recommended for hypercoagulable states during the course of therapy.

Identification of risk factors for adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to identifying new safety signals, pharmacovigilance databases could be used to identify potential risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether data mining in a pharmacovigilance database can be used to identify known and possible novel risk factors for ADRs, for use in pharmacovigilance practice. METHOD: Exploratory data mining was performed within the Swedish national database of spontaneously reported ADRs. Bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)-rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran-was used as a test model. We compared demographics, drug treatment, and clinical features between cases with bleeding (N = 965) and controls who had experienced other serious ADRs to DOACs (N = 511). Statistical analysis was performed by unadjusted and age adjusted logistic regression models, and the random forest based machine-learning method Boruta. RESULTS: In the logistic regression, 13 factors were significantly more common among cases of bleeding compared with controls. Eleven were labelled or previously proposed risk factors. Cardiac arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation), hypertension, mental impairment disorders (e.g., dementia), renal and urinary tract procedures, gastrointestinal ulceration and perforation, and interacting drugs remained significant after adjustment for age. In the Boruta analysis, high age, arrhythmia, hypertension, cardiac failure, thromboembolism, and pharmacodynamically interacting drugs had a larger than random association with the outcome. High age, cardiac arrhythmia, hypertension, cardiac failure, and pharmacodynamically interacting drugs had odds ratios for bleeding above one, while thromboembolism had an odds ratio below one. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that data mining within a pharmacovigilance database identifies known risk factors for DOAC bleeding, and potential risk factors such as dementia and atrial fibrillation. We propose that the method could be used in pharmacovigilance for identification of potential ADR risk factors that merit further evaluation.

Thromboembolic events in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are significant adverse events that can cause serious morbidities and mortality in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with gastric cancer (GC) treated with palliative chemotherapy have been reported to experience a TEE incidence of 5-27%. However, very few reports have addressed TEEs in adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for GC. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 611 GC patients (stage II: 309, III: 302) who started AC with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (167 patients) or S-1 (444 patients) after undergoing curative resection between January 2013 and June 2020 at a single center. The incidence of TEEs during AC or within 1 year after AC completion was investigated, while analyzing the factors that influenced the TEEs' occurrence. RESULTS: TEEs were confirmed in 20 patients (3.3%), and TEEs occurred in almost all patients in the S-1 group (19 patients). The most common TEE types were cerebral infarction and pulmonary thromboembolism (five patients each). Although old age (≥ 70 years, p < 0.0001), S-1 treatment (p = 0.021), and hypertension (p = 0.017) were identified as significant risk factors for TEEs in univariate analysis, only old age showed a statistically significant correlation with TEEs' occurrence in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 3.07; 95% confidence interval 1.11-8.48; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: TEEs occurred in fewer patients with GC who had been treated with AC than patients who had received palliative chemotherapy in previous reports. However, elderly GC patients who are undergoing AC require more careful surveillance for possible TEEs, considering relatively higher incidence of them.

High-intensity interval training and thromboembolic events during chemotherapy for testicular cancer: a retrospective analysis from the Body & Cancer cohort.

Background: Men with testicular cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of thromboembolic events, with incidence rates between 8-24%. A recent trial evaluating the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) prematurely closed as three out of nine participants (33%) in the intervention group developed a thromboembolic event. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was: 1) (primary) to evaluate the incidence of thromboembolic events in men receiving chemotherapy for testicular cancer who had participated in HIIT during a 6-week exercise program (Body & Cancer) 2) to describe the feasibility of this program.Material and methods: Forty men who had participated in at least one HIIT session from February 2007 to February 2020 were included. Electronic medical records were searched for incident thromboembolic events (arterial and venous) during Body & Cancer and up to one-year post-chemotherapy. Attendance, cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2-peak), and upper and lower extremity muscular strength (1 repetition maximum (RM)) were obtained from the Body & Cancer database.Results: One participant developed a thromboembolic event during Body & Cancer. No participants developed a thromboembolic event in the follow-up period. In all, data represent 160 HIIT sessions with a median attendance of eight sessions [range 1-19]. Statistically significant increases in upper and lower extremity strength were observed (8.6 (4.2 to 13.0) and 26.0 (14.9 to 37.0) kg, respectively). No significant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness was found (0.14 (-0.03 to 0.31) l/min).Conclusion: While conclusions on the safety of HIIT cannot be drawn, data from the present study do not support previous findings cautioning avoidance of HIIT due to a possible added risk of thromboembolic events in men receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Considering the potential for positive effects on cardiovascular outcomes associated with HIIT, future studies with robust design should be performed in this population to confirm these observations.

Telemedicine-Based Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone treatment of several diseases. Its management is often challenging, and different telemedicine strategies have been implemented to support it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to systematically review the evidence on the impact of telemedicine-based oral anticoagulation management compared to usual care on thromboembolic and bleeding events. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were searched in 5 databases from inception to September 2021. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Total thromboembolic events, major bleeding, mortality, and time in therapeutic range were assessed. Results were pooled using random effect models. RESULTS: In total, 25 randomized controlled trials were included (n=25,746 patients) and classified as moderate to high risk of bias by the Cochrane tool. Telemedicine resulted in lower rates of thromboembolic events, though not statistically significant (n=13 studies, relative risk [RR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.07; I2=42%), comparable rates of major bleeding (n=11 studies, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.07; I2=0%) and mortality (n=12 studies, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.20; I2=11%), and an improved time in therapeutic range (n=16 studies, mean difference 3.38, 95% CI 1.12-5.65; I2=90%). In the subgroup of the multitasking intervention, telemedicine resulted in an important reduction of thromboembolic events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine-based oral anticoagulation management resulted in similar rates of major bleeding and mortality, a trend for fewer thromboembolic events, and better anticoagulation quality compared to standard care. Given the potential benefits of telemedicine-based care, such as greater access to remote populations or people with ambulatory restrictions, these findings may encourage further implementation of eHealth strategies for anticoagulation management, particularly as part of multifaceted interventions for integrated care of chronic diseases. Meanwhile, researchers should develop higher-quality evidence focusing on hard clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020159208; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=159208.

Effectiveness of perioperative anticoagulation interruption without heparin bridging on thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective invasive procedures: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This review will determine whether withholding heparin bridging is superior to bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring temporary interruption of anticoagulation therapy in the perioperative period of an elective invasive procedure. INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly diagnosed clinical arrhythmia. It is an important cause of cardioembolic events, requiring the use of oral anticoagulation in most patients. It is unclear whether heparin bridging during temporary interruption of anticoagulants has superior outcomes compared with no bridging in the perioperative setting. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that compare adults aged 18 years or older; diagnosed with atrial fibrillation; undergoing elective invasive procedures; and who have had oral anticoagulants temporarily withheld with heparin bridging with patients without heparin bridging. Participants will be excluded if they had an alternative reason for anticoagulation or were admitted for emergency surgery. Outcomes will include arterial or venous thromboembolism (including stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism), major bleeding events, non-major bleeding events, length of hospital stay, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL will be searched for randomized and non-randomized trials from inception until the present. Two independent reviewers will screen citations by title and abstract, and again at full text. Risk of bias will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal instrument, and data will be extracted using a modified extraction tool. Results will be synthesized using a random effects meta-analysis and presented in a forest plot. Heterogeneity will be tested for using the standard χ 2 and I2 tests. Overall certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022348538.

[Operative treatment of distal radial fractures under vitamin K antagonist or DOAC : Is preoperative interruption of these drugs necessary?] / Die operative Versorgung distaler Radiusfrakturen unter Marcumar oder DOAC : Ist ein präoperatives Absetzen der Medikation erforderlich?

BACKGROUND: Scientific data on emergency operations during ongoing treatment with vitamin K antagonists or with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are lacking, because interruption or bridging of this treatment is routinely performed for up to several days. To reduce time delays and to simplify this procedure, we perform operations of distal radial fractures immediately and without interruption of antithrombotic medication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this retrospective and monocentric study, we included only patients with distal radial fractures treated within 12 h after diagnosis with open reduction and volar plating and who received anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or DOAC. Primary aim of the study was evaluation of specific complications, such as revision due to bleeding or hematoma formation and secondary aims were thromboembolic events or infections. The endpoint was 6 weeks after the operation. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2020, 907 consecutive patients with distal radial fractures were operatively treated. Of these, 55 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 81.5 Jahre (63-94 years) and women (n = 49) were primarily affected. All operations were performed without tourniquets. With a study endpoint 6 weeks after operation, no revisions were performed for bleeding, hematoma, or infection and primary wound healing was assessed for all patients. One revision was performed for fracture dislocation. Thromboembolic events were also not documented. CONCLUSION: In this study the treatment of distal radial fractures within 12 h and without interruption of antithrombotic treatment was not associated with any imminent systemic complications. This applies to both vitamin K antagonists and DOAC; however, higher case numbers must confirm our results.

Randomized Trial of Anticoagulation Strategies for Noncritically Ill Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 have reported conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and effectiveness of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 not requiring intensive care unit treatment were randomized to prophylactic-dose enoxaparin, therapeutic-dose enoxaparin, or therapeutic-dose apixaban. The primary outcome was the 30-day composite of all-cause mortality, requirement for intensive care unit-level of care, systemic thromboembolism, or ischemic stroke assessed in the combined therapeutic-dose groups compared with the prophylactic-dose group. RESULTS: Between August 26, 2020, and September 19, 2022, 3,398 noncritically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were randomized to prophylactic-dose enoxaparin (n = 1,141), therapeutic-dose enoxaparin (n = 1,136), or therapeutic-dose apixaban (n = 1,121) at 76 centers in 10 countries. The 30-day primary outcome occurred in 13.2% of patients in the prophylactic-dose group and 11.3% of patients in the combined therapeutic-dose groups (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69-1.04; P = 0.11). All-cause mortality occurred in 7.0% of patients treated with prophylactic-dose enoxaparin and 4.9% of patients treated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.93; P = 0.01), and intubation was required in 8.4% vs 6.4% of patients, respectively (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.98; P = 0.03). Results were similar in the 2 therapeutic-dose groups, and major bleeding in all 3 groups was infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Among noncritically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the 30-day primary composite outcome was not significantly reduced with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. However, fewer patients who were treated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation required intubation and fewer died (FREEDOM COVID [FREEDOM COVID Anticoagulation Strategy]; NCT04512079).

Expression and Release of Tumor Cell Tissue Factor Triggers Recurrent Thromboembolism in a Patient with Endometrial Cancer.

Although cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a frequent complication in patients with malignancies, its treatment remains a challenge in daily practice. Here, we report the clinical course of a 51-year-old woman presenting with a highly thrombogenic paraneoplastic coagulopathy. Despite therapeutic anticoagulation with various agents, including rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and low-molecular-weight heparin, the patient suffered from recurrent venous and arterial thromboembolism. Locally advanced endometrial cancer was identified. Tumor cells showed strong expression of tissue factor (TF), and significant concentrations of TF-bearing microvesicles were detected in patient plasma. Coagulopathy was controlled only by continuous intravenous anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban. Multimodal antineoplastic treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, resulted in clinical cancer remission, which was paralleled by normalization of tumor markers, CA125 and CA19-9, D-dimer levels, and TF-bearing microvesicles. In summary, continuous anticoagulation with argatroban and multimodal anticancer treatment may be necessary to control TF-driven coagulation activation with recurrent CAT in endometrial cancer.

The use of prothrombin complex concentrate in chronic liver disease: A review of the literature.

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis present a rebalanced hemostatic system in the three phases of haemostasis. This balance is however unstable and can easily tip towards bleeding or thrombosis. Management of both spontaneous bleeding and bleeding during invasive procedures remains a challenge in this patient population. Transfusion of blood products can result in circulatory overload and thereby worsen portal hypertension. As an alternative to fresh frozen plasma (FFP), prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) may have merit in patients with liver disease because of their low volume. The impact of PCC in in-vitro spiking experiments of cirrhotic plasma is promising, but also warrants cautious use in light of thromboembolic risk. The majority of existing studies carried-out in CLD patients are retrospective or do not have an adequate control arm. A prospective study (the PROTON trial) was set up in 2013 to investigate the utility of PCC in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, the study has never recruited the planned number of patients. Robust data on PCC safety in CLD is also required. The limited existing evidence does not seem to indicate an excessive thromboembolic risk. Currently, the utilisation of PCC in CLD cannot be routinely recommended but can provide an option for carefully selected cases in which other measures were not sufficient to control bleeding and after delicately weighing risks and benefits.

Assessment of Hormonal Contraceptive Utilization and Associated Odds of Hypercoagulopathy in Patients with Venous Malformations Using a National Claims Database.

BACKGROUND: Vascular anomalies that exhibit a slow velocity of blood flow, specifically venous malformations (VM), are associated with hypercoagulability. There is limited literature on the utilization of hormonal contraceptives (HCs) and the development of clotting events in female individuals diagnosed with VM. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize HC utilization and associated odds of hypercoagulopathy in patients with VM of child-bearing age. METHODS: Using a national administrative claims database, we identified female patients with VM aged 15-49 years and a control population, matched for age and length of insurance enrollment, from 2016 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of hypercoagulation events associated with HC use. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven (47.2%) patients with VM and 1284 (45.4%) control patients utilized HCs during the study period. Oral contraceptives were the most common HC for patients with and without VM (73.8% and 76.9% of those taking HCs, respectively), and estrogen-containing combination HCs (70.4% in patients with VM and 75.9% in controls) were more prevalent than progestin-only HCs in both populations. Despite a heightened baseline odds of hypercoagulopathy in patients with VM relative to patients without VM (odds ratio = 12.54; 95% confidence interval 7.73-20.3), HC use was not associated with an increased odds of hypercoagulation in the VM subpopulation (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.46-1.46). In contrast, tobacco use (odds ratio = 2.12; 95% confidence interval 1.09-4.12) and a history of coagulopathy (odds ratio = 3.92; 95% confidence interval 1.48-10.36) were predictive of thromboembolic events in the VM cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients with VM may safely use HCs with careful consideration of other risk factors for thromboses.