Establishing consensus-based, assay-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to facilitate proper utilization of cardiac troponin measurements.

Implementation of the 99th percentile as the upper reference limit for cardiac troponin (cTn) assays is a seemingly lucid recommendation, but, in reality, is incredibly complex. Lack of harmonization between cTn assays diminishes the ability to have a single medical decision point across manufacturer assay/instruments. Moreover, even within a single cTn assay there are several published values corresponding to the "99th percentile". Variability in the determined value is primarily a function of population selection including: sample size, age, sex, exclusion criteria, and statistical methods. Given the complexities associated with this value, some countries have taken an expert consensus approach to endorsing harmonized, assay-specific, cTn 99th percentile values. The purpose of this manuscript is to highlight the intricacies associated with selecting a cTn 99th percentile and to review the approach that Australia used to endorse a nationwide upper reference limit for the Architect STAT hs-cTnI assay.

Terminology of cardiac troponin assays and data censoring.

We discuss the sensitivity terminology of cardiac troponin assays and its dependence on the selection of the reference population. In addition, the need for reasonable censoring of clinical laboratory test results is contrasted with potential loss of valuable clinical information.

[The new international criteria of cardiac infarction and highly sensitive troponins: new possibilities and new problems].

The article deals with short review of main provisions of international recommendations concerning new diagnostic criteria of cardiac infarction and algorithms of highly sensitive measurement of circulating concentrations of cardiac troponins. The particular attention is paid to methods of serial highly sensitive measurement of levels of troponins making it possible to confirm or to exclude cardiac infarction during 1-3 hours after admission of patient. The perspectives and problems related to implementation of highly sensitive troponins into common practice of laboratory diagnostic are discussed.

Implications of lowering threshold of plasma troponin concentration in diagnosis of myocardial infarction: cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between troponin concentration, assay precision, and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary centre in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 2092 consecutive patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome were stratified with a sensitive troponin I assay into three groups (<0.012, 0.012-0.049, and ≥0.050 µg/L) based on the 99th centile for troponin concentration (0.012 µg/L; coefficient of variation 20.8%) and the diagnostic threshold (0.050 µg/L; 7.2%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One year survival without events (recurrent myocardial infarction, death) in patients grouped by troponin concentration. RESULTS: Troponin I concentrations were <0.012 µg/L in 988 patients (47%), 0.012-0.049 µg/L in 352 patients (17%), and ≥0.050 µg/L in 752 patients (36%). Adoption of the 99th centile would increase the number of people receiving a diagnosis of myocardial infarction from 752 to 1104: a relative increase of 47%. At one year, patients with troponin concentrations of 0.012-0.049 µg/L were more likely to be dead or readmitted with recurrent myocardial infarction than those with troponin concentrations <0.012 µg/L (13% v 3%, P<0.001; odds ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 7.9). Compared with troponin ≥0.050 µg/L, patients with troponin 0.012-0.049 µg/L had a higher risk profile but were less likely to have a diagnosis of, or be investigated and treated for, acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: Lowering the diagnostic threshold to the 99th centile and accepting greater assay imprecision would identify more patients with acute coronary syndrome at risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death but would increase the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by 47%. It remains to be established whether reclassification of these patients and treatment for myocardial infarction would improve outcome.

Recent approaches to the standardization of cardiac markers.

The development of commercial assays for the determination of cardiac proteins has been one of the most important innovations in the field of cardiovascular diagnostics in the last decade. Some assays are, however, inadequately appraised prior to their introduction to clinical use. This paper focuses on some important preanalytical, analytical and interpretative problems, and summarizes the status of the ongoing local and international standardization efforts. The most urgent issue at the moment is the development of international reference materials, which can be used for the calibration of different assays, thus decreasing between-assay biases. In order to achieve comparability of test results, another important item is the standardization of the epitopes of the antibodies used for the assay development. Efforts to improve the precision of cardiac marker assays are also warranted. Finally, the effect of storage time and temperature on apparent marker concentration and the possible influence of different anticoagulants on measured marker values should clearly be evaluated.

Characterization of cardiac troponin subunit release into serum after acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays for troponin T and I. American Association for Clinical Chemistry Subcommittee on cTnI Standardization.

We examined the release of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I (cTnI) into the blood of patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Three postAMI serum samples were applied in separate analytical runs onto a calibrated gel filtration column (Sephacryl S-200), and the proteins were separated by molecular weight. Using commercial cTnT and cTnI assays measured on collected fractions, we found that troponin was released into blood as a ternary complex of cTnT-I-C, a binary complex of cTnI-C, and free cTnT, with no free cTnI within the limits of the analytical methodologies. The serum samples were also examined after incubation with EDTA and heparin. EDTA broke up troponin complexes into individual subunits, whereas heparin had no effect on the assays tested. We added free cTnC subunits to 24 AMI serum samples and found no marked increase in the total cTnI concentrations, using an immunoassay that gave higher values for the cTnI-C complex than free cTnI. To characterize the cross-reactivity of cTnT and cTnI assays, purified troponin standards in nine different forms were prepared, added to serum and plasma pools, and tested in nine quantitative commercial and pre-market assays for cTnI and one approved assay for cTnT. All nine cTnI assays recognized each of the troponin I forms (complexed and free). In five of these assays, the relative responses for cTnI were nearly equimolar. For the remainder, the response was substantially greater for complexed cTnI than for free cTnI. Moreover, there was a substantial difference in the absolute concentration of results between cTnI assays. The commercial cTnT assay recognized binary and ternary complexes of troponin on a near equimolar basis. We conclude that all assays are useful for detection of cardiac injury. However, there are differences in absolute cTnI results due to a lack of mass standardization and heterogeneity in the cross-reactivities of antibodies to various troponin I forms.