Diagnostic utility of cyclin D1 in the diagnosis of small round blue cell tumors in children and adolescents.

Small round blue cell tumors (SRBCTs) of children and adolescents are often diagnostically challenging lesions. With the increasing diagnostic approach based on small biopsies, there is the need of specific immunomarkers that can help in the differential diagnosis among the different tumor histotypes to assure the patient a correct diagnosis for proper treatment. Based on our recent studies showing cyclin D1 overexpression in both Ewing sarcoma/primitive peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/pPNET) and peripheral neuroblastic tumors (neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma), we immunohistochemically assessed cyclin D1 immunoreactivity in 128 cases of SRBCTs in children and adolescents to establish its potential utility in the differential diagnosis. All cases of EWS/pPNET and the undifferentiated/poorly differentiated neuroblastomatous component of all peripheral neuroblastic tumors exhibited strong and diffuse nuclear staining (>50% of neoplastic cells) for cyclin D1. In contrast, this marker was absent from rhabdomyosarcoma (regardless of subtype) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (either B- or T-cell precursors), whereas it was only focally detected (<5% of neoplastic cells) in some cases of Wilms tumor (blastemal component) and desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Our findings suggest that cyclin D1 can be exploitable as a diagnostic adjunct to conventional markers in confirming the diagnosis of EWS/pPNET or neuroblastoma/ganglioneuroblastoma. Its use in routine practice may also be helpful for those cases of SRBCT with undifferentiated morphology that are difficult to diagnose after application of the conventional markers.

Clinical and computed tomography features of adult abdominopelvic desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

To investigate the clinical and computed tomography (CT) features of desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical presentations, treatment and outcome, as well as CT manifestations of four cases of DSRCT confirmed by surgery and pathology. The CT manifestations of DSRCT were as follows: (1) multiple soft-tissue masses or diffuse peritoneal thickening in the abdomen and pelvis, with the dominant mass usually located in the pelvic cavity; (2) masses without an apparent organ-based primary site; (3) mild to moderate homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement in solid area on enhanced CT; and (4) secondary manifestations, such as ascites, hepatic metastases, lymphadenopathy, hydronephrosis and hydroureter. The prognosis and overall survival rates were generally poor. Commonly used treatment strategies including aggressive tumor resection, polychemotherapy, and radiotherapy, showed various therapeutic effects. CT of DSRCT shows characteristic features that are helpful in diagnosis. Early discovery and complete resection, coupled with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, are important for prognosis of DSRCT. Whole abdominopelvic rather than locoregional radiotherapy is more effective for unresectable DSRCT.

Diagnostic pitfalls of differentiating desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) from Wilms tumor (WT): overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical features.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and blastemal-predominant Wilms tumor (WT) share overlapping histologic features, yet accurate distinction is critical because of differing prognosis and treatment. We encountered a neck mass in a young adult with a concomitant abdominal mass. The neck mass was initially concerning for DSRCT on the basis of the poorly differentiated morphology, desmoplastic stroma, and immunoreactivity for desmin and cytokeratin. However, focal triphasic elements and glomeruloid bodies were identified on deeper sections, WT1 immunoreactivity was seen with antibodies to both the amino-terminus and carboxy-terminus, and EWSR1-WT1 rearrangement studies were negative, supporting the ultimate diagnosis of WT. On the basis of the overlapping histologic features of DSRCT and blastemal-predominant WT, we undertook a comparison study of desmin and cytokeratin reactivity patterns. We found that, whereas desmin reactivity was more frequent in DSRCT (11 of 12) than in WT blastema (11 of 22, P=0.024), dot-like perinuclear reactivity was seen with equal frequency in desmin-reactive DSRCT (10 of 11) and WT blastema (10 of 11), illustrating an important diagnostic pitfall. Moreover, we demonstrate coexpression of desmin and cytokeratin in both DSRCT (9 of 12) and WT blastema (11 of 22). Importantly, although dot-like desmin reactivity and coexpression of desmin and cytokeratin are historically associated with DSRCT, we demonstrate that these features can be seen in either DSRCT or blastemal-predominant WT. In these challenging cases, detection of an EWSR1-WT1 rearrangement and selective WT1 carboxy-terminus immunoreactivity (characteristic of DSRCT) or dual immunoreactivity for the WT1 amino-terminus and carboxy-terminus (characteristic of WT) remain the most discriminating diagnostic tools.