Endometrial stromal tumors: A clinico-histomorphological spectrum of endometrial stromal tumors with review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) are rare subset of mesenchymal uterine neoplasms. There are heterogeneous morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic features. Approximately 50% of ESTs occur in perimenopausal women. In 2020, WHO sub-categorized ESTs into four groups: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). OBJECTIVE: To review the morphological spectrum of endometrial stromal tumors. METHOD: This retrospective study reviewed the histomorphological features of 15 endometrial stromal tumors with respect to atypia, necrosis, mitosis, collagen bands, whorling around vessels, myometrial invasion, and inflammatory cells. Immunohistochemistry markers (CD10, SMA, and ER) along with special stains (Masson's trichrome, toluidine blue) were also studied. RESULTS: The age of the patients ranged from 32 to 60 years. Three patients were postmenopausal. The most common presenting symptom was vaginal bleeding. Five patients were operated with a clinical diagnosis of uterine fibroid. One patient presented with prolapse with no other complaint. All the 15 patients had total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. One case showed necrosis, eight cases showed collagen bands, all the 15 cases showed whorling around vessels, one case showed vascular emboli, and seven cases showed inflammatory cells. In low-grade cases, one case showed focal atypia and one case showed focal coagulative necrosis indicating infarction. Thirteen cases were LGESS, and one case of ESN and HGESS. All cases were positive for ER and CD10. CONCLUSION: Endometrial stromal tumors demonstrate extensive permeation of the myometrium as irregular islands with frequent vascular invasion, whorling around vessels, collagen bands, and inflammatory cells. All these features should be observed thoroughly on microscopy by pathologists to clearly differentiate the low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal tumors, and to understand the overlapping gray areas morphologically as it affects the prognosis of the patient.

Targeted RNA Sequencing Highlights a Diverse Genomic and Morphologic Landscape in Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma, Including Novel Fusion Genes.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) represents a morphologically and genetically heterogenous mesenchymal neoplasm. Previous work has shown that approximately half of LGESS are characterized by JAZF1::SUZ12 gene fusions, while a smaller proportion involves rearrangement of other genes. However, a subset of cases has no known genetic abnormalities. To better characterize the genomic landscape of LGESS, we interrogated a cohort with targeted RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). Cases previously diagnosed as low-grade endometrial stromal neoplasia (n=51) were identified and re-reviewed for morphology and subjected to RNA-Seq, of which 47 were successfully sequenced. The median patient age was 49 years (range: 19 to 85). The most commonly detected fusions were JAZF1::SUZ12 (n=26, 55%) and BRD8::PHF1 (n=3, 6%). In addition to the usual/typical LGESS morphology, some JAZF1::SUZ12 fusion tumors showed other morphologies, including fibrous, smooth muscle, sex-cord differentiation, and myxoid change. Novel translocations were identified in 2 cases: MEAF6::PTGR2 and HCFC1::PHF1 . Ten tumors (21%) had no identifiable fusion, despite a similar morphology and immunophenotype to fusion-positive cases. This suggests that a subset of cases may be attributable to fusion products among genes that are not covered by the assay, or perhaps altogether different molecular mechanisms. In all, these findings confirm that RNA-Seq is a potentially useful ancillary test in the diagnosis of endometrial stromal neoplasms and highlight their diverse morphology.

A Case of Uterine Tumor Resembling Ovarian Sex Cord Tumor With Prominent Myxoid Features.

Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor (UTROSCT) is a rare tumor with low malignant potential that commonly occurs in middle age. Although more than 100 cases have been reported to date, myxoid morphology is not well documented. Here, we present a 75-yr-old woman with abnormal vaginal bleeding, with an 8-cm mass in the uterine corpus detected by irregular, high-intensity signaling on T2-weighted imaging. The uterine mass had a glistening mucinous appearance on gross examination. Microscopically, most of the tumor cells were floating in the myxoid stroma. The tumor cells formed clusters or nests with abundant cytoplasm, while some exhibited trabecular or rhabdoid appearances. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for pancytokeratin (AE1/AE3), α-smooth muscle actin, CD10, progesterone receptor, and some sex cord markers such as calretinin, inhibin, CD56, steroidogenic factor-1. Electron microscopy demonstrated epithelial and sex cord differentiation. This tumor was negative for JAZF1-JJAZ1 fusion gene that is frequently found in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Fusion genes related to UTROSCT, including NCOA2/3 , were not detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The present case suggests that UTROSCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of myxoid uterine tumors.

An Unusual Endometrial Stromal Neoplasm With JAZF1-BCORL1 Rearrangement.

Endometrial stromal tumors represent the second most common category of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Several different histologic variants and underlying genetic alterations have been recognized, one such being a group associated with BCORL1 rearrangements. They are usually high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, often associated with prominent myxoid background and aggressive behavior. Here, we report an unusual endometrial stromal neoplasm with JAZF1-BCORL1 rearrangement and briefly review the literature. The neoplasm formed a well-circumscribed uterine mass in a 50-yr-old woman and had an unusual morphologic appearance that did not warrant a high-grade categorization. It was characterized by a predominant population of epithelioid cells with clear to focally eosinophilic cytoplasm growing in interanastomosing cords and trabeculae set in a hyalinized stroma as well as nested and fascicular growths imparting focal resemblance to a uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex-cord tumor, PEComa, and a smooth muscle neoplasm. A minor storiform growth of spindle cells reminiscent of the fibroblastic variant of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma was also noted but conventional areas of low-grade endometrial stromal neoplasm were not identified. This case expands the spectrum of morphologic features seen in endometrial stromal tumors, especially when associated with a BCORL1 fusion and highlights the utility of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques in the diagnosis of these tumors, not all of which are high grade.

ZC3H7B-BCOR Fusion High-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma With Morphologic Features of Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma. A Case Report and Review of Literature.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion are rare. They are predominantly located in the endomyometrium, with morphologic features characterized as haphazardly arranged fascicles of spindle cells with mild to moderate atypia, abundant myxoid matrix, high mitotic index, and tongue-like/pushing patterns of myometrial invasion. Furthermore, conventional or variant low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are often not present. Clinically, they present at a higher stage and are associated with worse prognosis compared with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Given the limited number of reported cases, we describe the case of a ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma initially diagnosed on the hysterectomy specimen as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma based on an endometrial stromal tumor showing tongue-like myometrial and lymphovascular invasion, minimal cytologic atypia, low-mitotic activity (0-1/10 high-power field), round/spindle cell component and immunohistochemical stain results (positive for CD10, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and focally positive for cyclin D1). At the time of pathologic diagnosis, she was Stage Ia and managed conservatively. Subsequent molecular analysis revealed a ZC3H7B (exon 10)- BCOR (BCL-6 corepressor) (exon 7) gene fusion. On follow-up, she showed no evidence of disease at 37 months from the time of diagnosis. This case report expands the morphologic spectrum of ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion high-grade ESS, which includes an intramural location, morphologic and immunophenotypic features similar to LG-ESS, as well as the presence of round and spindle cell components. This case also underscores the value of molecular analysis in the proper classification of ESS.

Endometrial/Endometrioid Stromal Tumors With Extensive Whorling and CTNNB1 Translocation : A Report of 3 Cases.

Endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors are rare and morphologically heterogenous, and their diagnosis may be challenging. We identified 3 endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors with identical and previously undescribed histologic features and herein report their morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular profiles. Patients were 53, 62, and 79 years. Tumors were well-circumscribed, tan-yellow solid masses measuring 10.0, 11.0, and 18.7 cm, and were intramyometrial (n=2) or in the broad ligament (n=1). All showed small, tight whorls of epithelioid to slightly spindled tumor cells with minimal cytoplasm and negligible mitoses, multifocally associated with hyalinization and myxoid change set in a loose fibroblastic background with small, delicate vessels. This morphology was seen throughout in 1 tumor and in ∼20% and 70% of the 2 others with the remaining areas showing sex cord-like differentiation. Tumor cells expressed CD10 (3/3, 1 focal), calretinin (3/3 diffuse), WT1 (3/3 diffuse), estrogen receptor (1/1, diffuse). RNA-sequencing was successful in 1 tumor and revealed a GREB1-CTNNB1 in-frame fusion. All 3 tumors harbored a CTNNB1 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization correlating with nuclear ß-catenin expression. Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis classified all 3 tumors within the low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma reference class with flat copy number profiles. One patient (79-y-old) died of unrelated causes 2 months after surgery and the other 2 were alive without disease after 13 and 75 months. We have described a rare subset of endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors with extensive whorling and a CTNNB1 translocation, expanding the morphologic and molecular spectrum of these neoplasms.

Uterine Endometrial Stromal Tumors With Pure Low-Grade Morphology Harboring YWHAE::NUTM2 Fusions: Report of a Case Series Emphasizing Potential for High-Grade Transformation and Aggressive Behavior.

Uterine endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) with YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusions are typically morphologically high-grade tumors composed of atypical round cells, sometimes associated with a low-grade fibromyxoid component; they are currently included in the category of high-grade ESS (HGESS). We report 5 morphologically pure low-grade endometrial stromal tumors harboring YWHAE::NUTM2 fusions, including 1 endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) and 4 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), an association only occasionally reported previously. Patients ranged from 30 to 51 (mean=43) years and tumors from 4.5 to 7.5 cm (mean=5.7). All were stage I at diagnosis (confined to the uterus). Microscopically, the 4 LGESS showed extensive "tongue-like" invasion of the myometrium, and the ESN was entirely confined to the endometrium with no myometrial invasion. All tumors were composed entirely of morphologically uniform bland ovoid cells resembling proliferative endometrial stroma. A fibromyxoid component was seen in 1 LGESS and the ESN; in the LGESS, this was the sole component. Atypical round cells characteristic of YWHAE::NUTM2 HGESS were not identified. Mitotic count ranged from <1 to 13 per 10 high-power fields (mean: 3). CD10 was positive in 2/4 (focal), estrogen receptor in 5/5 (focal=1; diffuse=4), progesterone receptor in 5/5 (focal=1; diffuse=4) and cyclin D1 was diffusely positive in 3/4. Follow-up was available in all 5 patients and ranged from 6 to 159 months (mean=72). Two patients with LGESS had recurrent disease at 15 and 155 months; 1 showed predominantly LGESS with rare round cells in the initial recurrence and pure HGESS in a subsequent recurrence, while the other patient's recurrent tumor was predominantly HGESS (90%) in a background of focal fibromyxoid LGESS (10%). Both patients rapidly progressed and died of disease within 5 months of high-grade recurrence. We show that rare cases of morphologically pure low-grade endometrial stromal tumors, some but not all with a fibromyxoid component, harbor YWHAE::NUTM2 fusions and may recur rapidly, with transformation to HGESS and aggressive behavior. Our findings suggest that at least a subset of YWHAE::NUTM2 HGESS evolves from LGESS. We suggest that cyclin D1 and CD10 staining should be performed in all LGESS. Diffuse staining for cyclin D1 and/or negative or focal staining for CD10 should suggest the possibility of a YWHAE::NUTM2 fusion, and appropriate molecular testing should be undertaken. Since no single morphological or immunohistochemical parameter is entirely sensitive for fusion status, we also suggest that testing for a YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusion should be considered in all cases of LGESS and, if a fusion is present, this should raise the possibility of subsequent high-grade transformation and aggressive behavior, even though such cases should still be categorized as LGESS. Although seemingly rare, ESN and LGESS with YWHAE::NUTM2 fusions may be under-recognized due to a lack of routine fusion testing.

Primary ovarian endometrial stromal sarcoma after hysterectomy associated with multiple organ invasion: A case report.

RATIONALE: Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare disease in patients with uterine malignancies, accounting for <1%. Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) accounts merely 0.2% of gynecologic malignant tumor. Primary low-grade extrauterine endometrioid stromal sarcomas (LGEESS) is even more uncommon, with only a few documented case reports. We report a case of primary LGEESS exhibiting widely invasion in multiple organs after hysterectomy, which is the first case reported in Jiangsu Province of China. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 42-year-old nulliparous female with dysgnosia presented with a moderate amount of irregular vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and distension, and frequent urination for 2 days. Her surgical history included a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy for uterine fibroids 6 years ago. Ultrasonography and the abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scan detected some solid polycystic masses in the pelvic and abdominal cavities. DIAGNOSES: The histopathology of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of LESS in the absence of florid endometriosis. The patient was diagnosed with primary extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma at FIGO stage III. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery and histopathology were performed. OUTCOME: After surgery, the patient was maintained on leuprorelin acetate microspheres with sustained release for injection at 3.75 mg once every 4 weeks while refusing further radiotherapy. LESSONS: The diagnosis of primary LGEESS is challenging mainly because of their unforeseen location and nongynecologic signs and symptoms. Total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are recommended to LGESS, while additional resection for extrauterine disease depends on disease extent and resectability.

Endometrial stromal tumors of the uterus: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes.

Endometrial stromal tumors (EST) are uterine mesenchymal tumors, which histologically resemble endometrial stroma of the functioning endometrium. The majority of EST are malignant tumors classified as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Overall, ESTs are rare malignancies, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.30 per 100'000 women, mainly affecting peri- or postmenopausal women. The most common genetic alteration identified in LG-ESS is the JAZF1-SUZ12 rearrangement, while t(10;17)(q23,p13) translocation and BCOR gene abnormalities characterize two major subtypes of HG-ESS. The absence of specific genetic abnormalities is the actual hallmark of UUS. Unlike HG-ESSs, LG-ESSs usually express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Total hysterectomy without morcellation and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the first-line treatment of early-stage LG-ESS. Ovarian preservation, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant hormonal therapy ± radiotherapy may be an option in selected cases. In advanced or recurrent LG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction followed by hormonal treatment, or vice versa, are acceptable treatments. The standard treatment for apparently early-stage HG-ESS and UUS is total hysterectomy without morcellation with BSO. Ovarian preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy may be an option. In advanced or recurrent HG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered. Alternative treatments, including biological agents and immunotherapy, are under investigation. LG-ESSs are indolent tumor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80-100% and present as stage I-II at diagnosis in two third of patients. HG-ESSs carry a poor prognosis, with a median OS ranging from 11 to 24 months, and 70% of patients are in stage III-IV at presentation. UUS median OS ranges from 12 to 23 months and, at diagnosis, 70% of patients are in stage III-IV. The aim of this review is to assess the clinical, pathological, and biological features and the therapeutic options for malignant ESTs.

Prognostic factors and survival of patients with uterine sarcoma: a German unicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Uterine sarcoma (US) as a histologically heterogeneous group of tumors is rare and associated with poor prognosis. Prognostic factors based on systematic data collection need to be identified to optimize patients' treatment. METHODS: This unicenter, retrospective cohort study includes 57 patients treated at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany between 1999 and 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and visualized in Kaplan-Meier curves. Prognostic factors were identified using log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS: 44 Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 7 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), 4 high-grade ESS and 2 undifferentiated US patients were identified. The median age at time of diagnosis was 51.0 years (range 18-83). The median follow-up time was 35 months. PFS for the total cohort was 14.0 (95%-Confidence-Interval (CI) 9.7-18.3) and OS 36.0 months (95%-CI 22.1-49.9). Tumor pathology was prognostically significant for OS with LG-ESS being the most favorable (mean OS 150.3 months). In the multivariate analysis, patients over 52 years showed a four times higher risk for tumor recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 4.4; 95%-CI 1.5-12.9). Progesterone receptor negativity was associated with a two times higher risk for death (HR 2.8; 95%-CI 1.0-7.5). For LMS patients age ≥ 52 years (p = 0.04), clear surgical margins (p = 0.01), FIGO stage (p = 0.01) and no application of chemotherapy (p = 0.02) were statistically significant factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Tumor histology, age at time of diagnosis and progesterone receptor status were prognostic factors for US. Unfavorable OS in LMS patients was associated with advanced FIGO stage, suboptimal cytoreduction and application of chemotherapy.

A novel CDKN1A-JAZF1 gene fusion in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma arising from endometriosis in abdominal wall cesarean section scar: A case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We report a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) with a novel CDKN1A-JAZF1 fusion gene arising from abdominal wall endometrioma. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old woman presented with a 5.5-cm abdominal wall mass juxtaposed to the postoperative scar of two cesarean sections. Histologically, the tumor exhibited obvious tongue-like protrusions into the surrounding tissue, showed spindle cells with multinodular growth pattern that occasionally rotate around small arteries. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CD10, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), negatively stained for smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD117, CyclinD1. In addition, a previously undescribed gene fusion between CDNK1A 5' end of exon 1(NM_000389.5) and JAZF1 3' end of exon 5 (NM_175,061,3) was reported in this case. CONCLUSION: This report of ESS suggesting that rapidly growing abdominal wall masses without menstruation-related should be promptly evaluated and treated aggressively. In addition, we have expanded the molecular landscape of low-grade ESS.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of uterine sarcoma: a single-institution retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive gynaecologic malignancies, characterized by a relatively high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features and explore the prognostic factors of these malignancies. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study. We reviewed the medical records of 155 patients with pathologically confirmed uterine sarcomas including uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) and adenosarcoma (AS) between 2006 and 2022. A total of 112 patients who underwent surgery between January 2006 and April 2019 were included in the survival analysis. The current study recorded the clinicopathological, treatment and outcome data to determine clinical characteristics and survival. RESULTS: The most common histopathological type was ULMS (63/155, 40.64%), followed by LG-ESS (56/155, 36.13%) and HG-ESS (16/155, 10.32%). The mean age at diagnosis of all patients was 49.27±48.50 years and 32.90% (51/155) of patients were postmenopausal. Fifteen patients underwent fast-frozen sectioning, 63(54.78%) were diagnosed with malignancy, 29(25.22%) were highly suspected of malignancy that needed further clarification and 23(14.84%) were diagnosed with benign disease. A total of 124(80%) patients underwent total hysterectomy (TH) and salpingo-oophorectomy. Multivariate analyses showed that histological type and tumour size were independent prognostic factors both for overall survival (OS) (p<0.001 and P=0.017, respectively) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p<0.001 and P=0.018, respectively). Tumour stage was only significantly associated with PFS (P=0.002). Elevated preoperative NLR, PLR and postmenopausal status were significantly correlated with shorter PFS and OS in univariate analysis, but no statistically significant difference was found in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with uterine sarcoma, in comparison to LMS and LG-ESS, UUS and HG-ESS tend to present as more aggressive tumour with poorer outcomes. Furthermore, larger tumour (>7.5 cm) were an important predictor of shorter PFS and OS.

Unusual morphologic features of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial stromal tumours are uncommon tumours of the uterus. They mainly occur in perimenopausal women. Tumours with typical clinicopathological features do not usually pose diagnostic problems. However, rare clinicopathological features can occur, and clinicians without significant experience may have difficulty diagnosing these tumours and managing these patients. METHODS: Herein, we report a case of endometrial stromal sarcoma that occurred in a 25-year-old woman. The pathological features, immunophenotype, treatment and prognosis were discussed. RESULTS: The tumour revealed morphological heterogeneity, and there were similar proliferative-type endometrial stromal cells, an extensive amount of mature adipose tissue, and prominent rhabdomyoblastic and smooth muscle cells. Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies confirmed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with smooth muscle, adipocytic and rhabdomyoblastic differentiation (approximately 60% were differentiated tissues). The final treatment of the tumour was total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. There was no evidence of recurrence for 109 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that low-grade endometrial stromal tumours with extensive adipocytic and prominent rhabdomyoblastic differentiation are misdiagnosed because they are infrequent. They must be differentiated from rhabdomyosarcoma with accurate identification of adipocytes, and long-term follow-up is needed.

Recurrent KAT6B/A::KANSL1 Fusions Characterize a Potentially Aggressive Uterine Sarcoma Morphologically Overlapping With Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma.

With the widespread application of next-generation sequencing, the genetic landscape of uterine mesenchymal neoplasms has been evolving rapidly to include several recently identified fusion genes. Although chromosomal rearrangements involving the 10q22 and 17q21.31 loci have been reported in occasional uterine leiomyomas decades ago, the corresponding KAT6B::KANSL1 fusion has been only recently identified in 2 uterine tumors diagnosed as leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. We herein describe 13 uterine stromal neoplasms carrying a KAT6B::KANSL1 (n=11) and KAT6A::KANSL1 (n=2) fusion. Patient ages ranged from 33 to 81 years (median, 49 y). Tumor size was 2.6 to 23.5 cm (median, 8.2 cm). Nine tumors were myometrium-centered, and 3 had an intracavitary component. Original diagnoses were mostly low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS; 10 cases) with atypical features (limited CD10 expression, sex cord-like features, pericytic vasculature, and frequent myxoid changes). Treatment was hysterectomy±bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (10), myomectomy (1), and curettage (2). Five patients were disease-free at 6 to 34 months, 3 (27%) died of disease at 2 to 47 months, and 3 were alive with disease at 2, 17, and 17 years. Histologically, most tumors showed variable overlap with LG-ESS, but they were generally well-circumscribed lacking the extensive permeative and angioinvasive growth typical of LG-ESS. They were composed of monotonous medium-sized oval and spindle cells arranged into diffuse sheets with prominent spiral-type arterioles and frequent pericytoma-like vascular pattern. Variable myxoid stromal changes were frequent. Mitotic activity ranged from 1 to >20 in 10 HPFs. Immunohistochemistry showed variable expression of CD10 (12/13), estrogen receptor (8/11), progesterone receptor (8/11), smooth muscle actin (9/11), desmin (4/12), h-caldesmon (2/10), calretinin (3/8), inhibin (1/7), WT1 (4/7), cyclin D1 (5/11; diffuse in only 1 case), and pankeratin (5/10). This series characterizes a KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion-positive uterine stromal neoplasm within the morphologic spectrum of LG-ESS but with atypical features. The relationship of these neoplasms to genuine LG-ESS remains unclear. This molecular subtype of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma has the potential for an unfavorable clinical course despite the absence of widely invasive growth; nevertheless, analysis of more cases is necessary to delineate the phenotypic spectrum and biological potential of this tumor.

[Endometrial and other rare uterine sarcomas : Diagnostic aspects in the context of the 2020 WHO classification]. / Endometriale und weitere seltene uterine Sarkome : Diagnostische Aspekte im Kontext der WHO-Klassifikation 2020.

Uterine sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies. Mostly (40-50%), they are leiomyosarcomas, followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS), low-grade (LG) and high-grade (HG), as well as undifferentiated sarcoma of the uterus (UUS) and adenosarcomas (AS). Other, non-organ-specific tumours such as NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasia, perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) are extremely difficult to differentiate.In the most recent WHO classification, endometrial stromal tumours are subdivided as follows: benign, expansively growing endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) with sharp demarcation, the histologically similar-looking LG-ESS with infiltrative growth, the highly malignant HG-ESS and, as a diagnosis of exclusion, the highly aggressive UUS lacking specific lines of differentiation. LG-ESS can be differentiated from HG-ESS in most cases histomorphologically and immunohistochemically, but molecular investigations are necessary in individual cases. HG-ESS can be divided into 4 subtypes (YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion low-grade component, YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion high-grade component, ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion or BCOR-ITD) on the basis of molecular findings. Prognostically unfavourable factors in AS are severe sarcomatous overgrowth, deep myometrial invasion, high-grade histology and lymphatic vessel invasion. Tumours with NTRK fusion are immunohistochemically positive for S100 and TRK. PEComas express cathepsin K and HMB45, as well as TFE3 when translocation is present. Almost every IMT shows an alteration in the ALK gene In the case of overlapping morphology and simultaneous therapeutic and prognostic relevance, it is becoming increasingly important to verify or confirm the suspected histomorphological diagnosis by immunohistochemical and possibly molecular investigations.

High-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Molecular Alterations and Potential Immunotherapeutic Strategies.

Endometrial stromal tumor (EST) is an uncommon and unusual mesenchymal tumor of the uterus characterized by multicolored histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. The morphology of ESTs is similar to normal endometrial stromal cells during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. ESTs were first classified into benign and malignant based on the number of mitotic cells. However, recently WHO has divided ESTs into four categories: endometrial stromal nodules (ESN), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS). HG-ESS is the most malignant of these categories, with poor clinical outcomes compared to other types. With advances in molecular biology, ESTs have been further classified with morphological identification. ESTs, including HG-ESS, is a relatively rare type of cancer, and the therapeutics are not being developed compared to other cancers. However, considering the tumor microenvironment of usual stromal cancers, the advance of immunotherapy shows auspicious outcomes reported in many different stromal tumors and non-identified uterine cancers. These studies show the high possibility of successful immunotherapy in HG-ESS patients in the future. In this review, we are discussing the background of ESTs and the BCOR and the development of HG-ESS by mutations of BCOR or other related genes. Among the gene mutations of HG-ESSs, BCOR shows the most common mutations in different ways. In current tumor therapies, immunotherapy is one of the most effective therapeutic approaches. In order to connect immunotherapy with HG-ESS, the understanding of tumor microenvironment (TME) is required. The TME of HG-ESS shows the mixture of tumor cells, vessels, immune cells and non-malignant stromal cells. Macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells and natural killer cells lose their expected functions, but rather show pro-tumoral functions by the matricellular proteins, extracellular matrix and other complicated environment in TME. In order to overcome the current therapeutic limitations of HG-ESS, immunotherapies should be considered in addition to the current surgical strategies. Checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine-based immunotherapies, immune cell therapies are good candidates to be considered as they show promising results in other stromal cancers and uterine cancers, while less studied because of the rarity of ESTs. Based on the advance of knowledge of immune therapies in HG-ESS, the new strategies can also be applied to the current therapies and also in other ESTs.

Endometrial stromal tumors: Diagnostic updates and challenges.

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors of endometrial stromal origin. They are classified into endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma by the current (2020) WHO classification. Correct diagnosis of endometrial stromal tumors is critical for proper patient management. However, due to infrequent encounters, overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles, the differential diagnoses among endometrial stromal lesions and their morphologic mimics are often challenging. Partially with our own experience, here we review and summarize the tumor morphology, immunohistochemical phenotype, as well as molecular feature of endometrial stromal tumors and key differential diagnoses, emphasizing the newest developments and their utilization in daily practice.