Clinical features and prognosis of malignant small bowel tumors: Experience from a university hospital in Chile / Características clínicas y pronóstico de los tumores malignos de intestino delgado: experiencia en un hospital universitario de Chile

Background Small bowel tumors (SBT) are infrequent and represent a small proportion of digestive neoplasms. There is scarce information about SBT in Latin America.AimTo describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and survival of malignant SBTs.MethodsRetrospective observational study of adult patients with histopathological diagnosis of SBT between 2007 and 2021 in a university hospital in Chile.ResultsA total of 104 patients [51.9% men; mean age 57 years] with SBT. Histological type: neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (43.7%, n=38), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) (21.8%, n=19), lymphoma (17.2%, n=15) and adenocarcinoma (AC) (11.5%, n=10). GIST was more frequent in duodenum (50%; n=12) and NET in the ileum (65.8%; n=25). Metastasis was observed in 17 cases, most commonly from colon and melanoma. Nausea and vomiting were significantly more often observed in AC (p=0.035), as well as gastrointestinal bleeding in GIST (p=0.007). The most common diagnostic tools were CT and CT enteroclysis with an elevated diagnostic yield (86% and 94% respectively). The 5-year survival of GIST, NET, lymphoma and AC were 94.7% (95%CI: 68.1–99.2), 82.2% (95%CI: 57.6–93.3), 40.0% (95%CI: 16.5–82.8) and 25.9% (95%CI: 4.5–55.7%), respectively. NET (HR 6.1; 95%CI: 2.1–17.2) and GIST (HR 24.4; 95%CI: 3.0–19.8) were independently associated with higher survival compared to AC, adjusted for age and sex.ConclusionsMalignant SBT are rare conditions and NETs are the most common histological subtype. Clinical presentation at diagnosis, location or complications may suggest a more probable diagnosis. GIST and NET are associated with better survival compared to other malignant subtypes. (AU)

Introducción Los tumores del intestino delgado (TID) son infrecuentes y la información sobre ellos es escasa en Latinoamérica.ObjetivoDescribir la epidemiología, características clínicas, métodos diagnósticos y supervivencia de los TID malignos.MétodosEstudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes adultos con diagnóstico histopatológico de TID entre 2007-2021 en un hospital universitario de Chile.ResultadosSe observaron 104 pacientes (51,9% hombres; edad media 57 años) con TID. El tipo histológico fue tumor neuroendocrino (TNE) (43,7%, n=38), tumor estromal gastrointestinal (GIST) (21,8%, n=19), linfoma (17,2%, n=15) y adenocarcinoma (AC) (11,5%, n=10). Los GIST fueron más frecuentes en el duodeno (50%; n=12) y los TNE en el íleon (65,8%; n=25). Hubo 17 casos de metástasis, más comúnmente de colon y melanoma. Las náuseas y los vómitos se observaron con mayor frecuencia en AC (p=0,035), así como el sangrado gastrointestinal en GIST (p=0,007). Las herramientas de valoración más comunes fueron TC y enteroclisis por TC con un rendimiento diagnóstico alto (86% y 94%, respectivamente). La supervivencia a cinco años de los GIST, TNE, linfoma y AC fue 94,7% (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 68,1-99,2), 82,2% (IC 95%: 57,6-93,3), 40,0% (IC 95%: 16,5-82,8) y 25,9% (IC 95%: 4,5-55,7), respectivamente. Los TNE (hazard ratio [HR] 6,1; IC 95%: 2,1-17,2) y GIST (HR 24,4; IC 95%: 3,0-19,8) se asociaron de forma independiente con una mayor supervivencia en comparación con AC, ajustado por edad y sexo.ConclusionesLos TID malignos son enfermedades poco frecuentes y los TNE son el subtipo histológico más común. La presentación clínica en el momento del diagnóstico, localización o complicaciones pueden sugerir un dictamen más probable. Los GIST y TNE se asocian a una mejor supervivencia en comparación con otros subtipos malignos. (AU)

Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for ensuring both complete resection and preservation of anal function in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to clarify short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST. METHODS: A total of 13 patients who underwent robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST between December 2011 and April 2022 were included. All robotic procedures were performed using a systematic approach. A supplemental video of robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST is attached. The short-term outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications during the first 30 days after surgery. Surgical outcomes were retrieved from a prospective database. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, were determined in all patients. RESULTS: Median distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 4.0 cm. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. Two patients underwent neoadjuvant imatinib therapy. All patients underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. None underwent conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and grade ≥ III complications was 7.7% and 0%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Twelve patients (92.3%) underwent stoma closure within 5 months of the initial surgery. Median follow-up time was 76 months. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were both 100%. None of the patients had recurrence. CONCLUSION: Short-term and long-term outcomes after radical robotic surgery for rectal GIST were favorable. Robotic surgery might be a useful surgical approach for rectal GIST.

Feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with tumor diameter of >5 cm.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an effective treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The utility of LECS for gastric GISTs of > 5 cm remains controversial. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of LECS for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of >5 cm. METHODS: We analyzed 43 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent LECS or laparoscopic partial gastrectomy (Lap-Partial Gx). We compared the surgical outcomes of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx and of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm. RESULTS: In the comparison of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the groups. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. In the comparison of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm, there were no significant intergroup differences in operative time, or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the > 5-cm and ≤ 5-cm groups (0.0% vs. 4.5%, respectively ; p = 0.56). Additionally, no recurrence or death occurred during follow-up in either group. CONCLUSION: LECS is a feasible option for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of > 5 cm. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 148-153, February, 2024.

A rare clinical case of extra-gastrointestinal stromal pancreatic tumor.

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors arising from the pancreas are extremely rare. To date, just over 30 cases have been described in the world literature. A clinical observation of a 67-year-old patient with dull epigastric pain and a large cystic solid neoplasm instrumentally identified as an extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the head of the pancreas is presented. The volume of surgical intervention consisted of pancreatogastroduodenectomy and right-sided hemicolectomy, since tumor invasion into the transverse mesocolon was detected intraoperatively. The final diagnosis of extra-gastrointestinal stromal sarcoma of the head of the pancreas with invasion into the mesocolon pT4N0M0, stage IIIb was made on the basis of histopathology and immunohistochemistry results.

Evaluating nomogram models for predicting survival outcomes in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with SEER database analysis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) predominantly develop in the stomach. While nomogram offer tremendous therapeutic promise, there is yet no ideal nomogram comparison customized specifically for handling categorical data and model selection related gastric GISTs. (1) We selected 5463 patients with gastric GISTs from the SEER Research Plus database spanning from 2000 to 2020; (2) We proposed an advanced missing data imputation algorithm specifically designed for categorical variables; (3) We constructed five Cox nomogram models, each employing distinct methods for the selection and modeling of categorical variables, including Cox (Two-Stage), Lasso-Cox, Ridge-Cox, Elastic Net-Cox, and Cox With Lasso; (4) We conducted a comprehensive comparison of both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) tasks at six different time points; (5) To ensure robustness, we performed 50 randomized splits for each task, maintaining a 7:3 ratio between the training and test cohorts with no discernible statistical differences. Among the five models, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram contains the fewest features. Notably, at Near-term, Mid-term, and Long-term intervals, the Cox (Two-Stage) model attains the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC), top-1 ratio, and top-3 ratio in both OS and CSS tasks. For the prediction of survival in patients with gastric GISTs, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram stands as a simple, stable, and accurate predictive model with substantial promise for clinical application. To enhance the clinical utility and accessibility of our findings, we have deployed the nomogram model online, allowing healthcare professionals and researchers worldwide to access and utilize this predictive tool.

A Unique Case of Mesenteric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as an Acute Abdomen.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the digestive tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal in the mesenteric plexus. These tumors can originate in any part of the GI tract; however, a higher burden has been observed in the stomach and small intestines. Mesenteric GISTs are exceedingly rare, with unique clinicopathological features and a poorer prognosis. Herein, we describe a unique case of a 66-year-old female with a remote history of appendectomy who presented to the emergency room complaining of severe abdominal pain and vomiting. On imaging, the patient was found to have a large inflammatory mass associated with small bowel loops, and the pathology confirmed a mesenteric GIST. The tumor was resected, and the genomic test results confirmed the KIT (exon 11) mutation. Although the tumor had a low mitotic rate, the tumor was large enough to warrant the initiation of adjuvant imatinib mesylate for 36 months with regular bloodwork and imaging.

Non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor, mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract: a review of tumor genetics, pathology, and cross-sectional imaging findings.

There is a diverse group of non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that demonstrate characteristic pathology and histogenesis as well as variable imaging findings and biological behavior. Recent advancements in tumor genetics have unveiled specific abnormalities associated with certain tumors, influencing their molecular pathogenesis, biology, response to treatment, and prognosis. Notably, giant fibrovascular polyps of the esophagus, identified through MDM2 gene amplifications, are now classified as liposarcomas. Some tumors exhibit distinctive patterns of disease distribution. Glomus tumors and plexiform fibromyxomas exhibit a pronounced affinity for the gastric antrum. In contrast, smooth muscle tumors within the GI tract are predominantly found in the esophagus and colorectum, surpassing the incidence of GISTs in these locations. Surgical resection suffices for symptomatic benign tumors; multimodality treatment may be necessary for frank sarcomas. This article aims to elucidate the cross-sectional imaging findings associated with a wide spectrum of these tumors, providing insights that align with their histopathological features.

A case-matched study of imatinib mesylate between different formulations on plasma trough concentration, adverse events, quality of life and outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Genike, the imatinib (IM)-alpha form is widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in China. We wanted to investigate whether there are differences in IM plasma concentrations, adverse events, health-related quality of life (QOL) and outcomes between patients treated with Genike and Glivec. Thirty included GIST patients receiving IM treatment were matched to either Genike or Glivec according to gastrectomy, body weight, body surface area and sex. There was no statistically significant difference in IM trough plasma levels between the two groups. There were no significant differences in very common adverse events of IM between the Genike and Glivec groups. IM was well tolerated, although it was associated with a significant change in cognitive function (P < 0.001), fatigue (P = 0.015), pain (P = 0.015), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.029), insomnia (P = 0.019), diarrhea (P = 0.003) and financial difficulties (P < 0.001). Physical functioning, financial burden and insomnia were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.026). Until Aug. 2022, there was no significant difference in time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in IM plasma concentration and adverse events between Genike and Glivec. Both Genike and Glivec could partially decrease the QOL of GIST patients. Physical functioning was worse in Genike group than in Glivec group, while the economic burden and symptoms of insomnia in Glivec patients were worse. There was no significant difference in TTF between the two groups.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation. PATIENTS: In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.

ETV6::NTRK3 Fusion-Positive Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) with Abundant Lymphoid Infiltration (TILs and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures): A Report on a New Case with Therapeutic Implications and a Literature Review.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, with proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (c-kit), or PDGFRα mutations detected in around 85% of cases. GISTs without c-kit or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) mutations are considered wild-type (WT), and their diverse molecular alterations and biological behaviors remain uncertain. They are usually not sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, some molecular alterations, including neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions, have been reported in very few cases of WT GISTs. This novel finding opens the window for the use of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor therapy in these subtypes of GIST. Herein, we report a new case of NTRK-fused WT high-risk GIST in a female patient with a large pelvic mass (large dimension of 20 cm). The tumor was removed, and the histopathology displayed spindle-predominant morphology with focal epithelioid areas, myxoid stromal tissue, and notable lymphoid infiltration with tertiary lymphoid structures. Ten mitoses were quantified in 50 high-power fields without nuclear pleomorphism. DOG1 showed strong and diffuse positivity, and CD117 showed moderate positivity. Succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) was retained, Pan-TRK was focal positive (nuclear pattern), and the proliferation index Ki-67 was 7%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) detected an ETV6::NTRK3 fusion, and this finding was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which showed NTRK3 rearrangement. In addition, an RB1 mutation was found by NGS. The follow-up CT scan revealed peritoneal nodules suggestive of peritoneal dissemination, and Entrectinib (a TRK inhibitor) was administered. After 3 months of follow-up, a new CT scan showed a complete response. Based on our results and the cases from the literature, GISTs with NTRK fusions are very uncommon so far; hence, further screening studies, including more WT GIST cases, may increase the possibility of finding additional cases. The present case may offer new insights into the potential introduction of TRK inhibitors as treatments for GISTs with NTRK fusions. Additionally, the presence of abundant lymphoid infiltration in the present case may prompt further research into immunotherapy as a possible additional therapeutic option.

The correlation of sarcopenia and adverse events of imatinib therapy postoperatively in gastrointestinal stromal tumor through computed tomography quantitative body composition.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between sarcopenia and adverse events (AEs) of postoperative imatinib therapy through computed tomography (CT) quantitative body composition for intermediate- and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 208 patients with intermediate- and high-risk GIST treated surgically and treated with imatinib afterward at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between October 2011 and October 2021. Images of preoperative CT scans within 1 month were used to determine the body composition of the patients. On the basis of the L3 skeletal muscle index, patients were classified into sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups. In 2 groups, AEs related to imatinib were analyzed. RESULTS: The proportion of AEs related to imatinib in the sarcopenia group was higher, and this disparity had a significant statistical significance (P = .013). Sarcopenia was significantly associated with hemoglobin reduction compared with nonsarcopenia (P = .015). There was a significant difference between the sarcopenia group and the nonsarcopenia group in the ratio of severe AEs (grades 3-4). Hemoglobin content (odds ratio [OR], 0.981; 95% CI, 0.963-1.000; P = .045), sex (OR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.192-0.904; P = .027), and sarcopenia (OR, 5.631; 95% CI, 2.262-14.014; P < .001) were the influential factors of imatinib severe AEs in patients with intermediate- and high-risk GIST within 1 year after imatinib treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative sarcopenia have a higher incidence and severity of AEs during adjuvant imatinib therapy.

[Intestinal calcifying fibrous tumor: case report]. / Tumor fibroso calcificante intestinal: reporte de caso.

Calcifying fibrous tumor (CFT) is a rare benign lesion of mesenchymal origin that may present similar characteristics to other more common tumors. We present the case of a 36-year-old woman with a tumor in the proximal jejunum, initially suspected to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Surgical resection was performed, revealing a well-demarcated nodule at the anti-mesenteric border with microscopic features typical of a calcifying fibrous tumor. The tumor cells were positive for CD34 and negative for other markers, differentiating it from other neoplasms. Calcifying fibrous tumors can be confused with more common tumors because of its appearance, but an accurate diagnosis supported by immunohistochemistry is essential. Complete surgical excision is usually curative.

Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and local resection for gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors surrounding the esophagogastric junction are often challenging to resect, with no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique. Here in, we present a case of concurrent gastric cancer in the antrum and gastrointestinal stromal tumors adjacent to the esophagogastric junction. The patient underwent simultaneous distal gastrectomy and local resection assisted by a surgical robot, avoiding the need for total gastrectomy. The utilization of robot-assisted surgery has become an increasingly popular technique, holding promise for simplifying complex surgical procedures across diverse medical settings.

Treatment Access for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in Predominantly Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Importance: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib mesylate or sunitinib malate. In general, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to these treatments is limited. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics, treatment duration, and survival of patients with GIST in LMICs treated with imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective database cohort analysis included patients in 2 access programs administered by The Max Foundation: the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, and the Max Access Solutions (MAS) program, January 1, 2017, to October 12, 2020. Sixty-six countries in which The Max Foundation facilitates access to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Participants consisted of patients with approved indications for imatinib, including adjuvant therapy in high-risk GIST by pathologic evaluation of resected tumor or biopsy-proven unresectable or metastatic GIST. All patients were reported to have tumors positive for CD117(c-kit) by treating physicians. A total of 9866 patients received treatment for metastatic and/or unresectable disease; 2100 received adjuvant imatinib; 49 received imatinib from another source and were only included in the sunitinib analysis; and 53 received both imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Data were analyzed from October 13, 2020, to January 30, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic and clinical information was reported by treating physicians. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). An imputation-based informed censoring model estimated events for patients lost to follow-up after treatment with adjuvant imatinib. Patients who were lost to follow-up with metastatic or unresectable disease were presumed deceased. Results: A total of 12 015 unique patients were included in the analysis (6890 male [57.6%]; median age, 54 [range, 0-100] years). Of these, 2100 patients were treated with imatinib in the adjuvant setting (median age, 54 [range 8-88] years) and 9866 were treated with imatinib for metastatic or unresectable disease (median age, 55 [range, 0-100] years). Male patients comprised 5867 of 9866 patients (59.5%) with metastatic or unresectable disease and 1023 of 2100 patients (48.7%) receiving adjuvant therapy. The median OS with imatinib for unresectable or metastatic disease was 5.8 (95% CI, 5.6-6.1) years, and the median TTD was 4.2 (95% CI, 4.1-4.4) years. The median OS with sunitinib for patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.5) years; the median TTD was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) years. The 10-year OS rate in the adjuvant setting was 73.8% (95% CI, 67.2%-81.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with GIST who were predominantly from LMICs and received orally administered therapy through the GIPAP or MAS programs, outcomes were similar to those observed in high-resource countries. These findings underscore the feasibility and relevance of administering oral anticancer therapy to a molecularly defined population in LMICs, addressing a critical gap in cancer care.

[A Case of a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Stomach with Lymph Node Metastasis].

A 87-year-old female was pointed out wall thickness in the upper part of gastric body for examination of anemia. The mass had a contrast effect, some of it protruded outside the wall, and the surrounding lymph nodes were enlarged. Upper endoscopy showed irregular ulcerative lesion with submucosal volume from posterior wall to the greater curvature in the upper part of gastric body. Biopsy was performed, and GIST of stomach was diagnosed. Surgery was performed for the GIST of the stomach. During open surgery, invasion of pancreatic tail was observed, therefore proximal gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection and distal pancreatectomy were performed. Pathologically, the tumor measured 95×78×65 mm with mitotic figures(38/50 high-power fields). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that tumor cells expressed positive results for c-kit, α-SMA and CD34, and negative results for S-100 and desmin on the basis of the histology and immunostaining profile, the tumor was diagnosed as a GIST. The patient was classed as high risk according to Fletcher's risk classification. Tumor invades pancreatic tail, and lymph node metastasis was observed. She was discharged on the postoperative day 27 and alive without tumor recurrence at 6 months after surgery, not undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comparable long­term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a diameter of 5-10 cm.

Currently, endoscopic treatment for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been widely accepted. However, for tumors larger than 5 cm, endoscopic treatment has not been recognized by national guidelines as the standard therapy due to concerns about safety and adverse tumor outcomes. Therefore, this study compares the long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment for GIST in the range of 5-10 cm. We selected patients with GIST from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were employed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used for analysis to identify risk factors influencing patient prognosis. To balance baseline data, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1223 GIST patients were included, with 144 patients (11.8%) received endoscopic treatment and 1079 patients (88.2%) received surgical treatment. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in the long-term survival rates between the two groups [5-year OS (86.5% vs. 83.5%, P = 0.42), 10-year OS (70.4% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.42)]. After adjusting for covariates, we found that the overall survival (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.77, P = 0.19) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.99-2.89, P = 0.053) risks were comparable between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. In the analysis after PSM, there was no significant difference between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. Our study found that for GIST patients with tumor sizes between 5 and 10 cm, the long-term OS and CSS outcomes were similar between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group.

The long-term efficacy of imatinib with hepatic resection or other local treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The liver is the most common site of metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The authors aimed to evaluate imatinib (IM) combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), compared to IM monotherapy in long-term survival benefits in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases. METHODS: Our research encompassed 238 patients diagnosed with liver metastases of GISTs from January 2002 to April 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. The oncological outcomes of concern included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and liver-specific PFS. RESULTS: Of all 238 patients, 126 were treated with IM alone (IM group), 81 with IM combined with HR (IM+HR group), and 31 with IM combined with RFA/TACE (IM+RFA/TACE group). The median follow-up time was 44.83 months. The median OS in the IM group was 132.60 months and was not reached in either the IM+HR group or the IM+RFA/TACE group. The 10-year OS rate in the IM+HR group was significantly superior to the IM group and the IM+RFA/TACE group (91.9% vs. 61.1% vs. 55.2%, respectively, P =0.015), and the liver-specific PFS ( P =0.642) and PFS ( P =0.369) in the three groups showed a beneficial trend in the combined treatment group. Multivariate analyses showed that age less than or equal to 60 years (HR 0.280, P< 0.001) and IM+HR (HR 0.361, P =0.047) were independently associated with better OS. Achieving no evidence of disease through surgical intervention was independently correlated with enhanced OS (HR 0.099, P =0.034), liver-specific PFS (HR 0.388, P =0.014), and PFS (HR 0.402, P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GIST liver metastases, IM combined with HR might improve OS in selected patients compared with IM alone and IM combined with RFA/TACE. Achieving no evidence of disease status with surgical treatment of patients results in significant prolonging of OS, liver-specific PFS, and PFS.

Jejunojejunal intussusception induced by a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report and literature review.

Intussusception is defined as the invagination of a proximal segment of the bowel into the adjoining or distal segment. In most adults with intussusception, there is a demonstrable lead point with a definite pathologic abnormality. The clinical features of intussusception include chronic intermittent abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and a palpable abdominal mass. The present case report describes a 62-year-old woman with a 2-week history of abdominal pain and 9-day history of vomiting. Clinical, imaging, and histologic evaluations revealed a jejunojejunal intussusception with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor as the lead point. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor should be considered as a possible lead point in adult patients with intussusception. The implication of reducing the intussusception prior to tumor resection requires further evaluation in view of the risk of venous embolism, including direct spread of malignant cells, in cases involving a large polypoid mass with a necrotic surface that extends to the serosa as shown by intraoperative examination. Accordingly, the rationale for adjuvant therapy with imatinib also requires further evaluation.