Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 154
Filtrar
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 4): 33-36, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775695

RESUMO

In Egypt, there is presently a growing need to have a deceased donor transplant program. Egypt conducted its first kidney transplant from a living donor in 1976 and a first partial liver transplant in 2001. Since 2009, the Egyptian Health Authorities Combat Transplant Tourism in concordance with ethics codes and the Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group has been in place. The Egyptian Transplantation Law of 2011 mentions that organs could be procured from deceased donors based on a will and on family consent. This law has had many critics, including religious authorities who have stressed that organs cannot be taken from a person with brain death because, in their view, life ends with death of all organs. Many intensivists disagree over the definition of death. In addition, the media has communicated contradicting and sometimes misleading health care information. Mummification is rooted in pharos practice and linked to religious beliefs. The ancient Egyptians believed that, by burying the deceased with their organs, they may rejoin with them in the afterlife. Since 2019, the transplant community in Egypt has started collaborations with international transplant organizations and campaigns with doctors and celebrities to donate their organs after death, which have stressed that a deceased donor program could help against end-stage organ mortality. In November 2022, after communications with politicians, President Abdelfattah El Sisi directed the government to establish a regional center for organ transplantation, which aimed to be the biggest in the Middle East and North Africa region. The new center will be part of a new medical city that would replace Nasser Medical Institution in Cairo, Egypt. The Ministry of Health issued an official form to be signed by a person before his death, accepting use of organs, to give hope and support to other patients in need.


Assuntos
Transplante de Órgãos , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Humanos , Egito , Transplante de Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplante de Órgãos/ética , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Doadores de Tecidos/legislação & jurisprudência , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Religião e Medicina , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Turismo Médico/ética , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Atitude Frente a Morte , Morte Encefálica , Formulação de Políticas , Regulamentação Governamental , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(1)2021 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33429930

RESUMO

Background and objectives: To explore the ethical and legal complexities arising from the controversial issue of surrogacy, particularly in terms of how they affect fundamental rights of children and parents. Surrogacy is a form of medically-assisted procreation (MAP) in which a woman "lends" her uterus to carry out a pregnancy on behalf of a third party. There are pathological conditions, such as uterine agenesis or hysterectomy outcomes, that may prevent prospective mothers from becoming pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term; such patients may consider finding a surrogate mother. Many issues relating to surrogacy remain unresolved, with significant disagreements and controversy within the scientific community and public opinion. There are several factors called into play and multiple parties and stakeholders whose objectives and interests need to somehow be reconciled. First and foremost, the authors contend, it is essential to prioritize and uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy and heterologous MAP. Materials and methods: To draw a parallel between Italy and the rest of the world, the legislation in force in twelve European countries was analyzed, eleven of which are part of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Portugal) and three non-members of the same (United Kingdom, Ukraine and Russia), as well as that of twelve non-European countries considered exemplary (United States, Canada, Australia, India, China, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and South Africa); in particular, legislative sources and legal databases were drawn upon, in order to draw a comparison with the Italian legislation currently in force and map out the evolution of the Italian case law on the basis of the judgments issued by Italian courts, including the Constitutional and Supreme Courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar were also used, by entering the keywords "surrogacy" and "surrogate motherhood", to find scientific articles concerning assisted reproduction techniques with a close focus on surrogacy. Results: SM is a prohibited and sanctioned practice in Italy; on the other hand, it is allowed in other countries of the world, which leads Italian couples, or couples from other countries where it is banned, to often contact foreign centers in order to undertake a MAP pathway which includes surrogacy; in addition, challenges may arise from the legal status of children born through surrogacy abroad: to date, in most countries, there is no specific legislation aimed at regulating their legal registration and parental status. Conclusion: With reference to the Italian context, despite the scientific and legal evolution on the subject, a legislative intervention aimed at filling the regulatory gaps in terms of heterologous MAP and surrogacy has not yet come to fruition. Considering the possibility of "fertility tourism", i.e., traveling to countries where the practice is legal, as indeed already happens in a relatively significant number of cases, the current legislation, although integrated by the legal interpretation, does not appear to be effective in avoiding the phenomenon of procreative tourism. Moreover, to overcome some contradictions currently present between law 40 and law 194, it would be appropriate to outline an organic and exhaustive framework of rules, which should take into account the multiplicity of interests at stake, in keeping with a fair and sustainable balance when regulating such practices.


Assuntos
Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Mães Substitutas/legislação & jurisprudência , Altruísmo , Austrália , Criança , Proteção da Criança/ética , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Comércio , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Itália , Japão , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Federação Russa , Problemas Sociais , Tailândia , Ucrânia , Estados Unidos
6.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (52): 121-138, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-228080

RESUMO

En un contexto globalizado, donde el mundo convencional se expande a lo virtual, se desarrolla un análisis ético y jurídico del turismo médico en Colombia mediante la identificación de riesgos potenciales en la instrumentalización comunicativa. La oferta y demanda de cirugía estética acompañada del marketing, como un reflejo del deseo, lo bello y el maquillaje, promueven tensiones éticas latentes. La incertidumbre jurídica que gravita alrededor del flujo transfronterizo e indeterminación de los distintos sistemas jurídicos exterioriza varios frentes susceptibles de abordaje y que a su vez se erigen como desafíos. El trasfondo de las reflexiones que se divisan hace imprescindible reivindicar prerrogativas fundamentales, inherentes a los seres humanos, que parecen desvanecerse ante inserciones cada vez más frecuentes y penetrantes provenientes de realidades construidas y enraizadas en el vaivén de los precios (AU)


In a globalized context, where the conventional world expands into the virtual, an ethical and legal analysis of medical tourism in Colombia is developed through identifying potential risks via communicative instrumentalization. The supply and demand for cosmetic surgery along with the associated marketing, as it reflects on desire, beauty, and makeup, promote latent ethical tensions. The legal uncertainty that gravitates around the cross-border flow and the indeterminacy within the different legal systems externalizes on several fronts that should be addressed and which in turn pose challenges. The background of the reflections that can be seen make it essential to claim fundamental prerogatives, inherent to humanity, which seem to vanish when presented with the frequent and penetrating insertions coming from realities built and rooted in the fluctuations of prices (AU)


En un context globalitzat, on el món convencional s'expandeix al virtual, es desenvolupa una anàlisi ètica i jurídica del turisme mèdic a Colòmbia mitjançant la identificació de riscos potencials en la instrumentalització comunicativa. L'oferta i demanda de cirurgia estètica acompanyada del màrqueting, com un reflex del desig, el bell i el maquillatge, promouen tensions ètiques latents. La incertesa jurídica que gravita al voltant del flux transfronterer i indeterminació dels diferents sistemes jurídics exterioritza diversos fronts susceptibles d'abordatge i que al seu torn s'erigeixen com a desafiaments. El rerefons de les reflexions que s'albiren fa imprescindible reivindicar prerrogatives fonamentals, inherents als éssers humans, que semblen esvair-se davant insercions cada vegada més freqüents i penetrants provinents de realitats construïdes i arrelades en el vaivé dels preus (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Jurisprudência , Ética Médica , Colômbia
8.
Pediatrics ; 146(Suppl 1): S54-S59, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737233

RESUMO

In 2017, the court case over medical treatment of UK infant, Charlie Gard, reached global attention. In this article, I will analyze one of the more distinctive elements of the case. The UK courts concluded that treatment of Charlie Gard was not in his best interests and that it would be permissible to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. However, in addition, the court ruled that Charlie should not be transferred overseas for the treatment that his parents sought, even though specialists in Italy and the US were willing to provide that treatment. Is it ethical to prevent parents from pursuing life-prolonging treatment overseas for their children? If so, when is it ethical to do this? I will outline arguments in defense of obstructing transfer in some situations. I will argue, however, that this is only justified if there is good reason to think that the proposed treatment would cause harm.


Assuntos
Temas Bioéticos , Futilidade Médica/ética , Transferência de Pacientes/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Dissidências e Disputas , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/terapia , Itália , Masculino , Futilidade Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Pais , Transferência de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Recusa em Tratar/ética , Recusa em Tratar/legislação & jurisprudência , Texas , Traqueostomia/ética , Traqueostomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência
9.
Fertil Steril ; 113(5): 916-919, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32327242

RESUMO

This article aims to identify the main legal and ethical issues around international surrogacy. Owing to the legal diversity and ethical background of such a globalized practice, a review of the key existing literature on these two matters has been identified and analyzed. The article also identifies and analyzes the most significant legal solutions provided by supranational jurisdictions when dealing with cases of international surrogacy. The scope of the article includes the efforts to reach a minimum legal framework at the international level, with the aim not to standardize but to provide common legal solutions to those travelling abroad to have a child by means of surrogacy.


Assuntos
Turismo Médico , Medicina Reprodutiva , Mães Substitutas , Feminino , Humanos , Internacionalidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Gravidez , Medicina Reprodutiva/ética , Medicina Reprodutiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Mães Substitutas/legislação & jurisprudência
11.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet ; 21: 565-586, 2020 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31961722

RESUMO

Mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs, also referred to as mitochondrial replacement therapies) have given hope to many women who wish to have genetically related children but have mitochondrial DNA mutations in their eggs. MRTs have also spurred deep ethical disagreements and led to different regulatory approaches worldwide. In this review, we discuss the current regulation of MRTs across several countries. After discussing the basics of the science, we describe the current law and policy directions in seven countries: the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Israel, and Singapore. We also discuss the emerging phenomenon of medical tourism (also called medical travel) for MRTs to places like Greece, Spain, Mexico, and Ukraine. We then pull out some key findings regarding similarities and differences in regulatory approaches around the world.


Assuntos
Turismo Médico/ética , Mitocôndrias/genética , Doenças Mitocondriais/terapia , Terapia de Substituição Mitocondrial/ética , Terapia de Substituição Mitocondrial/legislação & jurisprudência , Austrália , Canadá , Feminino , Engenharia Genética/ética , Alemanha , Humanos , Israel , Doenças Mitocondriais/genética , Pessoalidade , Singapura , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
12.
J Travel Med ; 26(6)2019 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31281926

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical tourism (MT) is an increasingly utilized modality for acquiring medical treatment for patients globally. This review assimilates the current literature regarding MT, with particular focus on the applications, ethics and economics. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases for publications relating to MT from 2005 to 2018 yielded 43 articles for this review. RESULTS: Patients seeking elective bariatric, cosmetic and orthopedic surgery abroad are motivated by significantly lower costs, all-inclusive vacation packages and reduced wait times. Complication rates as high as 56% include infection, poor aesthetic and functional outcome and adverse cardiovascular events. Cross-border reproductive care has steadily increased due to less restrictive policies in select countries; however, the depth of research on outcomes and quality of care is abysmal. Stem cell therapy promise treatments that are often not well researched and offer minimal evidence of efficacy, yet patients are drawn to treatment through anecdotal advertisements and a last sense of hope. Transplant surgery sought to decrease wait times carries many of the similar aforementioned risks and may contribute to the practice of organ trafficking in countries with high rates of poverty. Patients and countries alike are motivated by a plethora of factors to engage in the MT industry but may be doing so without accurate knowledge of the quality, safety or potential for economic gain. Safety is of utmost importance to prevent surgical complications and the spread of treatment-resistant bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: MT is growing in popularity and complexity. The lack of standardization in its definition and regulation leads to difficulty in epidemiologic and economic analysis and ethical issues of informed consent and health equity. The findings of this review may be used by the stakeholders of MT, including patients and providers, to enhance informed decision-making and quality of care.


Assuntos
Turismo Médico , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Tomada de Decisões , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Turismo Médico/economia , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/normas , Viagem
14.
Ir J Med Sci ; 188(4): 1185-1189, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30798504

RESUMO

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has evolved rapidly in Asia with good outcomes for both donor and recipient. Nonetheless, LDLT remains a highly demanding technique and complex surgery. The potential risks to the donors provide the basis for many of the ethical dilemmas associated with LDLT. The transplant team must have a good knowledge of the principles of bioethics in order to handle these matters. To look after the need, donor's safety and the chance for good recipient outcomes, the principles of respect for the donor's autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence should be practiced. In accordance with the concept of equipoise, the risk to the donor must balance the benefit to the recipient. The transplant center should have adequate experience and proven expertise in LDLT. There are concerns regarding the validity of informed consent given by the donor. While donations to non-relative patients may, at first sight, indicate radical altruism, it is important to apply careful scrutiny. Though organ trading is strictly prohibited by the law, there seems to be an inherent risk with directed donations to strangers. Transplant tourism has flourished in some countries in spite of the existence of strict laws. There are reservations regarding transplantation done by foreign visiting teams. Donor websites facilitating patients and donors and Facebook pages bear no responsibility for the outcomes of their matches and cannot ensure sufficient and accurate information about donation, transplantation, and post-operation life. Telemedicine and virtual consultations appeared to work better when the clinician and the patient know and trust each other.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Transplante de Fígado/ética , Doadores Vivos/ética , Ásia , Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética , Período Pós-Operatório , Telemedicina
15.
Med Law Rev ; 27(3): 365-389, 2019 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690476

RESUMO

Australian medical professionals whose patients undertake assisted reproductive treatment abroad face a conflict: to try to provide optimal and on-going care for their patient at the same time as ensuring compliance with Australian legal, ethical, and professional rules which proscribe as unsafe or unethical key aspects of such treatment. A major suggestion from literature on medical travel is that risks to the patient can be mitigated through the involvement of the local professional. However, the force of legal regulation and ethical guidance in Australia strenuously directs clinicians away from involvement in overseas reproductive treatment. This article reports on 37 interviews with Australians travelling abroad for surrogacy, egg donation, and embryo donation, reflecting on patients' experiences with Australian medical professionals both before and after they travelled. Patient reports demonstrate a fragmented and bewildering medical landscape in Australia, in which the ability to access domestic care and expertise varied markedly depending upon the kind of treatment patients were seeking abroad, and the mode of practice of the Australian doctor. Doctors practicing within licensed IVF clinics were notably more constrained than those outside such a setting. Patients seeking egg donation were offered information and received a wide range of diagnostic and preparatory treatments, while those seeking surrogacy were shunned, chided and offered limited (and sometimes covert) assistance. While recent changes to national ethical guidance improve clarity on information giving, the ethical and legal propriety of Australian medical professionals providing diagnostic or preparatory treatment for cross border reproduction remains uncertain.


Assuntos
Ética Profissional , Pessoal de Saúde/ética , Pessoal de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Austrália , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Redução do Dano , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Turismo Médico/normas , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/normas
16.
J Med Ethics ; 45(1): 41-47, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30301813

RESUMO

Cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) can be defined as the movement from one jurisdiction to another for medically assisted reproduction (MAR). CBRC raises many ethical concerns that have been addressed extensively. However, the conclusions are still based on scarce evidence even considering the global scale of CBRC. Empirical ethics appears as a way to foster this ethical reflection on CBRC while attuning it with the experiences of its main actors. To better understand the 'in and out' situation of CBRC in Canada, we conducted an ethnographic study taking a 'critically applied ethics' approach. This article presents a part of the findings of this research, obtained by data triangulation from qualitative analysis of pertinent literature, participant observation in two Canadian fertility clinics and 40 semidirected interviews. Based on participants' perceptions, four themes emerged: (1) inconsistencies of the Canadian legal framework; (2) autonomy and the necessity to resort to CBRC; (3) safety and the management of CBRC individual risks; and (4) justice and solidarity. The interaction between these four themes highlights the problematic of 'reproductive outsourcing' that characterised the Canadian situation, a system where the controversial aspects of MAR are knowingly pushed outside the borders.


Assuntos
Turismo Médico/ética , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Canadá , Clínicas de Fertilização/ética , Humanos , Serviços Terceirizados/ética
18.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (44): 57-72, nov. 2018.
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-176789

RESUMO

La gestación por sustitución no está admitida en el ordenamiento jurídico español, pero si la modalidad altruista en otros países europeos. En este artículo se discuten los argumentos que se utilizan para dudar de su carácter altruista, así como las preocupaciones en torno a la dignidad de la gestante y del bebé, que tienen más que ver con la repulsa moral que ocasiona la creencia en el instinto maternal y la teoría del apego con vínculo genético o biológico. Se defiende la admisión de la gestación por sustitución como una nueva forma de filiación a través de un acuerdo reproductivo de carácter colaborativo, donde prime la voluntad procreacional, creando un instrumento jurídico que de seguridad a las partes implicadas y garantice sus derechos fundamentales


Surrogacy is not admitted in Spain, even though altruistic surrogacy is allowed in other European countries. This article approaches some arguments used to put under question its altruistic character, as well as the concerns about the dignity of the surrogate and the baby. These concerns have more to do with the moral repulse caused by the belief in the maternal instinct and the theory of bond with a genetic or biological link. The article proposes the admission of surrogacy as a new form of filiation through a collaborative reproductive agreement, where the procreational will prevails, creating a legal instrument that provides security to the parties involved and guarantees their fundamental rights


La gestació per substitució no està admesa en l'ordenament jurídic espanyol, però sí la modalitat altruista en altres països europeus. En aquest article es discuteixen els arguments que s'utilitzen per dubtar del seu caràcter altruista, així com les preocupacions a l'entorn de la dignitat de la gestant i del bebè, que tenen més a veure amb el rebuig moral que ocasiona la creença en l'instint maternal i la teoria del lligam afectiu quan hi ha vincles genètics o biològics. Es defensa l'acceptació de la gestació per substitució com una nova forma de filiació a través d'un acord reproductiu de caràcter col·laboratiu, on prevalgui la voluntat procreativa, creant un instrument jurídic que doni seguretat a les parts implicades i garanteixi els drets fonamentals


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Saúde Reprodutiva/ética , Saúde Reprodutiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Mães Substitutas/legislação & jurisprudência , Altruísmo , Pessoalidade , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos Humanos/legislação & jurisprudência
19.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(4): 1075-1080, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30252822

RESUMO

Medical tourism, or traveling abroad to obtain medical services, has evolved into a global health care phenomenon, with over 15 million U.S. patients each year seeking medical care internationally, representing a $50 billion dollar industry in 2017. Speculation and media fascination about the growing industry, diverse destinations, and rationale behind the medical tourists is rampant; however, the legal implications of tourism medicine, particularly when it goes wrong, are often unclear. On the international stage, accreditation agencies are limited in scope and practice, legal jurisdiction is difficult to establish, and the enforcement of rulings is nearly impossible. Patients seeking tourism medicine have little legal recourse and shoulder all the legal burden.


Assuntos
Regulamentação Governamental , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Turismo Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Ética Médica , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...