Successful treatment of solar urticaria with UVA1 hardening in three patients.

Solar urticaria (SU) is an uncommon photodermatosis that presents with sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) or visible light which triggers urticarial lesions. Treatment of SU is a challenge and usually involves antihistamines and photoprotection as a first-line treatment. Phototherapy regimens are recommended if these first-line treatments fail to control the disease. Induction of tolerance by phototherapy (UV hardening) has been commonly described as a treatment modality. UVA1 has deeper penetration to the dermis than UVA or NB-UVB; its use in SU has not been previously reported. We present 3 patients with SU who were successfully treated with UVA1.

Induction of Light Tolerance Using Narrowband UV-B in Solar Urticaria. / Inducción de fototolerancia con ultravioleta B de banda estrecha en urticaria solar.

INTRODUCTION: Solar urticaria is an uncommon photodermatosis. First-line treatment is with antihistamines; second-line treatment includes induction of light tolerance using UV phototherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol with narrowband UV-B in patients with solar urticaria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with solar urticaria with an action spectrum in the UV-A range, the visible light range, or both who had received therapy with narrowband UV-B for induction of light tolerance. Short courses of treatment were administered (<20 sessions, 3 per week) during spring. The initial dose was determined according to the skin type. The Skindex-29 was administered before treatment and after summer; a nonvalidated questionnaire was also administered after summer to evaluate disease activity and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: We included 8 patients with an action spectrum (4 with visible light and 4 with UVA plus visible light). Seventeen courses (1-6 per patient) were administered per year. The number of sessions per year ranged from 11 to 20. The mean dose of narrowband UV-B per course was 7.45J/cm2. No patients experienced flares or adverse effects during treatment. The response was satisfactory in 6 patients. The improvement in the overall Skindex-29 score was greater than 20% in 78.6% of cases. The improvement in the function and symptoms subscales was over 20% in 71% and 64% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Induction of light tolerance with narrowband UV-B in solar urticaria is safe and effective in a high percentage of patients.

Ultraviolet radiation and skin mast cells: Effects, mechanisms and relevance for skin diseases.

Mast cells (MCs) are well known as versatile effector cells in allergic reactions and several other immune responses. Skin MCs and cutaneous MC responses are subject to the effects of environmental factors including ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Numerous studies have assessed the effects of UVR on MCs, in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, UVR seems to have variable effects on non-activated and activated mast cells. In general, UV therapy is beneficial in the treatment of urticaria and mastocytosis, but the effects are variable depending on treatment regimen and type of UVR. Here, we review and summarise key reports from the older and current literature on the crosstalk of UVR and skin MCs. Specifically, we present the literature and discuss published reports on the effects of UVR on skin MCs in rodents and humans. In addition, we review the role of MCs in UVR-driven skin diseases and the influence of UV light on MC-mediated skin diseases. This summary of our current understanding of the interplay of skin MCs and UVR may help to improve the management of patients with urticaria and other MC disorders, to identify current gaps of knowledge, and to guide further research.

Mycophenolate mofetil as a treatment for urticarial dermatitis.

We report two cases of adults with urticarial dermatitis who could not be managed by a variety of treatments but who obtained good control with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A clinical response was seen 6-8 weeks from treatment onset and they were maintained on MMF 1 g twice daily (case 1), and MMF 1 g omni mane and 500 mg omni nocte (case 2), with no major exacerbations for many years. MMF is an immunosuppressive agent, which is currently used off-label for many dermatological conditions. To date, there have been no studies investigating the use of MMF as a treatment for urticarial dermatitis. The cases we present suggest that MMF is an effective treatment for this condition, and we recommend that MMF be considered as a treatment option.

Successful and long-lasting treatment of solar urticaria with ultraviolet A rush hardening therapy.

BACKGROUND: Solar urticaria (SU) is a photodermatosis that is thought to be caused through the effects of mast cell mediators released because of an altered chromophore, possibly a photoallergen recognized by IgE. Phototherapy for SU to induce a tolerant state appears to be most effective, but is often time consuming and provides only short-lived remission. Ultraviolet (UV) A rush hardening has been successful and less time consuming in serum factor-negative patients with SU. However, the mechanism of action and long-lasting effects of UVA rush hardening therapy remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate whether UVA rush hardening exhibits long-lasting therapeutic effects in serum factor-positive patients with SU and to examine the action mechanism of tolerance. METHODS: Two serum factor-positive patients with SU were exposed to multiple UVA irradiations at 1-h intervals per day for 2 or 3 days. Intradermal injection of their in vitro-irradiated autologous serum or compound 48/80 and a prick test for histamine were performed before and after UVA rush hardening. RESULTS: The two serum factor-positive patients with SU benefited greatly from UVA rush hardening, as documented by a marked increase in minimal wealing dose, and remained symptom free without using sunscreen in their daily life. Intradermal injection of in vitro-irradiated autologous serum induced wealing before hardening, but not in tolerized skin after hardening. The responses to compound 48/80 and histamine were unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: UVA rush hardening is an effective and long-lasting treatment even in serum factor-positive patients with SU. The mechanism of tolerance may involve continued blockade of photoallergen binding to IgE on mast cells, rather than depletion of mast cell mediators or histamine tachyphylaxis.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is a suitable treatment option for solar urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Narrowband (NB) ultraviolet (UV) B lamps are widely used for treatment and prophylaxis of several skin diseases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of two protocols of NB-UVB therapy for the prophylaxis of UVB-sensitive and UVB-insensitive solar urticaria (SU). METHODS: Subjects affected by SU underwent phototesting for assessment of the minimal erythemal dose and minimal urticarial dose. Patients without urticarial response to UVB underwent a single daily exposure every other day for 4 weeks (group A). Patients with a urticarial test response to broadband UVB or NB-UVB (group B) received 3 daily exposures (on working days) for the first week. Afterward, they were treated as the patients of group A for 3 weeks. Follow-up visits took place after 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients completed the study. In groups A (29 patients) and B (10 patients), the median total number of exposures was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 12; 15) and 25.5 (IQR 24; 27), respectively. The median total NB-UVB dose was 10.3 J/cm(2) (IQR 9.9; 11) for group A and 9.1 J/cm(2) (IQR 8.5; 10.6) for group B. At follow-up visits, patients reported good tolerance to the sun. LIMITATIONS: A direct comparison of NB-UVB with UVA or psoralen plus UVA for the photoprophylaxis of SU is still lacking. CONCLUSION: NB-UVB phototherapy was well-tolerated and effectively prevented SU relapses.

Narrowband ultraviolet B (311 nm, TL01) phototherapy in chronic ordinary urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic ordinary urticaria (COU) can severely reduce quality of life and be difficult to control. Ultraviolet (UV) A and UVB phototherapy has been reported to decrease the release of histamine from either mast cells and/or basophils. Previous small studies have suggested that UVB phototherapy is a good alternative treatment for COU. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of narrow-band UVB (NB-UVB) phototherapy for COU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients (three male, 19 female) received NB-UVB phototherapy. These patients had not responded to at least two H1 antihistamines, and most had been treated with a variety of antihistamine combinations. Clinical responses were assessed according to an outcome scoring scale. During both visits, patients were administered the following: the visual analogue scale (VAS) on present pruritus and/or whealing; chronic urticaria impact on patients' quality of life according to the interference with daily activities, quality of sleep, and flare-up rates. RESULTS: The median number of treatments was 31.4 (9-44), and the mean top dose was 9.46 J/cm(2) (1.1-16.4 J/cm(2)). NB-UVB treatment led to clearance in 10 patients (45%), marked improvement in five (22%), and moderate improvement in seven (31%) patients according to an outcome scoring scale. Mild side effects were observed in two patients. Six patients who cleared or observed marked improvement remained clear at follow-up for a period of six months to one year, and other patients had a few recurrent lesions that did not need retreatment. For VAS scores and total chronic urticaria impact on patients' quality of life scores, the differences between baseline and after treatment scores were significantly lower (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Narrow-band UVB (NB-UVB) therapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment option in second-line therapy for COU. This therapy can lead to subjective relief of pruritus and whealing and objective reduction of whealing. Further larger studies with longer follow-up periods are necessary to determine the proper clinical response and long-term complications of this therapy in COU.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is beneficial in antihistamine-resistant symptomatic dermographism: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic dermographism is the most common type of physical urticaria. It can be severe and poorly controlled with H1 antihistamines in some patients. Photochemotherapy (psoralen plus ultraviolet [UV] A) may help the itch of dermographism but the effect of narrowband (NB) UVB therapy has not been previously studied. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the clinical efficacy of NB UVB therapy for itch and whealing in symptomatic dermographism and to assess the duration of the effect during 3 months of follow-up. METHODS: Eight patients (6 female) were enrolled into an open uncontrolled prospective study. Intensity of itching and whealing was assessed with visual analog scales and the whealing response was evaluated by testing with a dermographometer at pressures of 20, 36, and 60 g/mm2 on the upper aspect of the back. NB UVB phototherapy was given for 6 weeks 3 times weekly starting at 50% of minimal erythema dose with 20% to 0% increments as tolerated. Fexofenadine (180 mg/d) was taken during the run-in period and subsequently throughout the study and follow-up as required. Patients were followed for 3 months with regular assessments every 6 weeks after completion of phototherapy. RESULTS: All patients showed an improvement in itching at the end of NB UVB treatment (mean [SD] reduction 52.3% [31.6%]). Subjective assessment of whealing revealed a significant improvement in all but two patients (mean [SD] reduction 71% [54%]). There was a small and statistically significant improvement in cumulative dermographometer-induced wheal widths at the end of phototherapy (P = .038). A time trend for the relapse of symptoms within 12 and 18 weeks after completing phototherapy was significant for both visual analog scale scores but not for dermographometer-induced whealing. LIMITATIONS: The apparent rarity of antihistamine-resistant symptomatic dermographism limited the study to a small number of participants. The severity of the condition did not permit a controlled and blinded study design. CONCLUSIONS: NB UVB phototherapy is an effective second-line treatment for patients with severe symptomatic dermographism responding poorly to fexofenadine. This therapy can lead to subjective relief of pruritus and whealing and objective reduction of whealing. NB UVB phototherapy may restore symptom control with antihistamines in some patients.

[Treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria unresponsive to type 1 antihistamines in monotherapy]. / Traitement de l'urticaire chronique idiopathique résistant aux anti-histaminiques de type 1 en monothérapie.

The chronic idiopathic urticaria treatment is a difficult and often frustrating problem for physicians. Due to the lack of definitive medical therapeutic programs to relieve the symptoms and prevent from their recurrence, several pharmacologic approaches to the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria are proposed. The chronic urticaria pharmacologic therapy is therefore fit to abrogate effects of histamine and other mediators on cutaneous vasculature and inflammatory cells that participate in the pathogenesis of the urticaria. The most common approach is to avoid all aggravating factors and to block histamine. The mainstay therapy is the H1 antihistamines. A significant number of patients may remain unresponsive even after an increase in the dose or a change in the type of H1 antihistaminic drug. In these cases, several therapies can be associated: combinations of H1 antihistamines, nonsedating one tablet (morning) and one sedating (evening), this approach is very usual but no study has confirmed it rational; addition an H2 antagonist to the previous treatment for some patients may improve control of their symptoms; alternatively, the tricyclic antidepressant, Doxepin is usually prescribed. The results of other drugs reported in the literature is unpredictable, to include them in a strategy therapy. The results with Badrenergic agents, nifedipine, ketotifen, leukotriene antagonists and tranexamic acid are variable and don't appear better than those with H1 antagonists. The efficiency of danazol has to be confirmed by other controlled studies. Warfarin, sulfasalazine and ultraviolet radiation have been used apparently successfully, but no controlled study has been published. Only when the above treatments have failed then immunosuppresive therapies, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis can be proposed for chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Treatment of chronic urticaria with PUVA or UVA plus placebo: a double-blind study.

Chronic urticaria is a disease for which the available range of treatment modalities is limited. Ultraviolet radiation has recently been shown to affect histamine release from mast cells. We therefore studied the effects of PUVA and UVA on chronic urticaria. Nineteen patients took part in the study, which was designed as a randomized double-blind study. Eleven patients received PUVA, and 8 received UVA plus a placebo. In the PUVA group, 7 patients showed improvement, 3 noticed no change, and 1 became worse. In the group that received UVA plus placebo, 5 patients experienced an improvement, whereas the other 3 showed no change. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant. However, the probability of achieving this degree of improvement in both groups just by chance is less than 1%. Consequently, the improvement noted could have been due to either UVA alone or a placebo effect. It is concluded that PUVA is not better than UVA in the treatment of chronic urticaria.

Ultraviolet light therapy in chronic urticaria.

Fifteen patients with chronic urticaria were treated with ultraviolet light B (UVB) for 1-3 months during the spring 1984 and a follow-up study was performed in November 1984-January 1985. Patients with cold urticaria, cholinergic urticaria and dermographism became clearly better or got rid of their symptoms more often than those with "non-specific" chronic urticaria. The good results achieved during the phototherapy held during the summer but in the autumn urticaria became worse in one third of the cases. The result suggests that UV-therapy might be worth trying in many patients with chronic urticaria.