Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 124
Filtrar
1.
Intern Med ; 62(23): 3455-3460, 2023 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37062749

RESUMO

Objective Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been reported to reduce the frequency of medication overuse in patients with migraine. The present study investigated whether or not CGRP-mAb treatment shows early effectiveness for medication overuse headache (MOH) in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients with MOH who received preventive treatment with CGRP-mAb from June 2021 to October 2022. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition was used to diagnose MOH. This study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University. Patients were recruited from this specialized headache outpatient center. Results In total, 69 patients with migraine had newly introduced CGRP-mAb, and 34 patients had MOH (49.3%). The mean±standard deviation patient age was 44±15.5 years old. The study population included 24 women (70.6%). The types of CGRP-mAb used were galcanezumab in 16 patients (47.0%), fremanezumab in 10 (29.4%), and erenumab in 8 (23.5%). The mean disease duration was 19.6±13.1 years. The types of migraine diagnosis were chronic migraine in 28 patients (82.4%) and migraine with aura in 11 patients (32.4%). The mean number of headache days in the month before administration of CGRP-mAb was 22±7.7 days; 1 month after administration, the MHD was 16.9±9.1 days. The change in MHD was -5.7 days (22.7%), indicating significant improvement (p<0.05). Conclusion CGRP-mAb has been suggested as a preventive treatment for patients with MOH. Further investigation of the long-term efficacy of CGRP-mAb for MOH is needed.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino
2.
Trials ; 23(1): 382, 2022 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Overall, 55% of the German population suffers from primary episodic headaches according to recent studies. Inadequate management of headache disorders is a significant medical problem. The prevalence of medication overuse headache (MOH) is about 1% with an estimated number of 800,000 people in Germany. Medication overuse (MO) and MOH are usually managed through a complex process of medication withdrawal and initiating of prophylaxis. However, patients who were successfully treated for MO or MOH have a high relapse rate in the following 2 years. Previously, continued monitoring of self-reported medication intake demonstrated lower relapse rates. The prevalence and burden of MO and MOH are high, and effective strategies to prevent the development of a relapse into MOH or de novo MOH are still missing. Therefore, the MOH trial was designed to assess the effects of combining self-reported medication intake with daily monitoring of the entered data and a personalized patient-specific medication intake feedback system in an easy-accessible app-based platform in order to prevent the development and relapse of MO(H). METHODS: The MOH trial is a randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter, prospective trial. A total of 624 migraine patients with frequent migraine attacks and 336 patients who underwent treatment for MO(H) will be randomly allocated to use either a customized app with or without individual feedback regarding their self-reported medication intake for 12 months. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients developing MO or MOH for at least 3 consecutive months between baseline and end of study visits. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effects of providing patients with feedback regarding their self-reported use of migraine medications and migraine days using a mobile software on the development or prevention of MO(H). We hypothesize that the development of MO(H) in patients with frequent episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) and relapse after treatment of MO(H) can be reduced by a feedback system. If this trial proves that using an app with specific and unspecific messaging to the patient is successful, this method, which is now investigated mainly in specialized headache centers, could later be extended to primary care, thus providing benefits for a broader patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025961 . Registered on 04 August 2021.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Aplicativos Móveis , Doença Crônica , Cefaleia , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva
3.
Neurology ; 98(14): e1409-e1421, 2022 04 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Overuse of symptomatic (i.e., acute) medications is common among those with chronic migraine. It is associated with developing frequent headaches, medication side effects, and reduced quality of life. The optimal treatment strategy for patients who have chronic migraine with medication overuse (CMMO) has long been debated. The study objective was to determine whether migraine preventive therapy without switching or limiting the frequency of the overused medication was noninferior to migraine preventive therapy with switching from the overused medication to an alternative medication that could be used on ≤2 d/wk. METHODS: The Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy (MOTS) trial was an open-label, pragmatic clinical trial, randomizing adult participants 1:1 to migraine preventive medication and (1) switching from the overused medication to an alternative used ≤2 d/wk or (2) continuation of the overused medication with no maximum limit. Participants were enrolled between February 2017 and December 2020 from 34 clinics in the United States, including headache specialty, general neurology, and primary care clinics. The primary outcome was moderate to severe headache day frequency during weeks 9 to 12 and subsequently during weeks 1 to 2 after randomization. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty participants were randomized; average age was 44 (SD 13) years; and 87.5% were female. At baseline, participants averaged 22.5 (SD 5.1) headache days over 4 weeks, including 12.8 (SD 6.7) moderate to severe headache days and 21.4 (SD 5.8) days of symptomatic medication use. Migraine preventive medication without switching of the overused medication was not inferior to preventive medication with switching for moderate to severe headache day frequency during weeks 9 to 12 (switching 9.3 [SD 7.2] vs no switching 9.1 [SD 6.8]; p = 0.75, 95% CI -1.0 to 1.3). The treatment strategies also provided similar outcomes during the first 2 weeks (switching 6.6 [SD 3.7] moderate to severe headaches days vs no switching 6.4 [SD 3.6]; p = 0.57, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.7). DISCUSSION: When reduction in moderate to severe headache days was used as the outcome of interest for the management of CMMO, migraine preventive medication without switching or limiting symptomatic medication is not inferior to migraine preventive medication with switching to a different symptomatic medication with a maximum limit of 2 treatment days per week. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02764320. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that, for patients who have CMMO, migraine preventive medication without switching or limiting the overused medication is noninferior to migraine preventive medication with switching and limiting symptomatic medication.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Adulto , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
4.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(3): e0083421, 2021 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878309

RESUMO

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) causes significant economic and welfare concerns to the broiler industry. For several decades, prophylactic supplementation of antimicrobial growth promoters was the primary method to control APEC; however, the recent shift to no antibiotics ever (NAE) production has increased colibacillosis incidence. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of season, flock age, and sample type on the prevalence and virulence of E. coli and to identify the serogroups and antimicrobial susceptibility of virulent and nonvirulent E. coli in NAE broiler farms. Litter, feces, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs were collected from 4 NAE farms during spring and summer seasons, and E. coli was isolated and confirmed by PCR. Confirmed E. coli isolates were tested for 5 APEC-virulence-associated genes (VAGs) using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Further, E. coli isolates with all five VAGs (100 isolates) and E. coli isolates without any VAGs (87 isolates) were screened against 11 antimicrobials through Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay, and their serogroups were tested using PCR. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS 9.4, and statistical significance was determined at a P value of ≤0.05. Overall, the prevalence of E. coli was not affected by season, flock age, or sample type. However, the prevalence of all tested VAGs decreased from spring to summer (P ≤ 0.002). The frequency of resistance was highest for tetracycline, and serogroups O8 (31%) and O78 (11%) were most frequent in virulent E. coli. In conclusion, there is a high prevalence of virulent E. coli in NAE farms, especially in the spring season. IMPORTANCE Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli causes one of the most detrimental bacterial diseases to the United States poultry industry, colibacillosis. Colibacillosis leads to decreased performance, early mortality, and subsequent production loss. Previously, colibacillosis was largely mitigated by the use of antimicrobial growth promoters. Due to concerns about antimicrobial resistance, the use of these promoters has been largely removed from the broiler industry. With recent shifts in the poultry industry to NAE broiler production, there is an increase in bacterial disease and mortality. We do not know how this shift to NAE affects APEC prevalence within broiler farms. Therefore, in the current study, we attempted to assess the prevalence and virulence of E. coli within an antibiotic-free broiler environment, assessed antimicrobial susceptibility, and identified the serogroups of virulent and nonvirulent E. coli.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Galinhas/microbiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/veterinária , Escherichia coli/genética , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Virulência/genética
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(6): 822-827, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33819054

RESUMO

DESCRIPTION: Antimicrobial overuse is a major health care issue that contributes to antibiotic resistance. Such overuse includes unnecessarily long durations of antibiotic therapy in patients with common bacterial infections, such as acute bronchitis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and cellulitis. This article describes best practices for prescribing appropriate and short-duration antibiotic therapy for patients presenting with these infections. METHODS: The authors conducted a narrative literature review of published clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, and individual studies that addressed bronchitis with COPD exacerbations, CAP, UTIs, and cellulitis. This article is based on the best available evidence but was not a formal systematic review. Guidance was prioritized to the highest available level of synthesized evidence. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should limit antibiotic treatment duration to 5 days when managing patients with COPD exacerbations and acute uncomplicated bronchitis who have clinical signs of a bacterial infection (presence of increased sputum purulence in addition to increased dyspnea, and/or increased sputum volume). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should prescribe antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia for a minimum of 5 days. Extension of therapy after 5 days of antibiotics should be guided by validated measures of clinical stability, which include resolution of vital sign abnormalities, ability to eat, and normal mentation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: In women with uncomplicated bacterial cystitis, clinicians should prescribe short-course antibiotics with either nitrofurantoin for 5 days, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) for 3 days, or fosfomycin as a single dose. In men and women with uncomplicated pyelonephritis, clinicians should prescribe short-course therapy either with fluoroquinolones (5 to 7 days) or TMP-SMZ (14 days) based on antibiotic susceptibility. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: In patients with nonpurulent cellulitis, clinicians should use a 5- to 6-day course of antibiotics active against streptococci, particularly for patients able to self-monitor and who have close follow-up with primary care.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Bronquite/tratamento farmacológico , Celulite (Flegmão)/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico
8.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 53(2): 102-110, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33103530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Knowledge on bacterial co-infections in COVID-19 is crucial to use antibiotics appropriately. Therefore, we aimed to determine the incidence of bacterial co-infections, antibiotic use and application of antimicrobial stewardship principles in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in four hospitals (1 university, 2 non-university teaching, 1 non-teaching hospital) in the Netherlands from March to May 2020 including consecutive patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19. Data on first microbiological investigations obtained at the discretion of the physician and antibiotic use in the first week of hospital admission were collected. RESULTS: Twelve (1.2%) of the 925 patients included had a documented bacterial co-infection (75.0% pneumonia) within the first week. Microbiological testing was performed in 749 (81%) patients: sputum cultures in 105 (11.4%), blood cultures in 711 (76.9%), pneumococcal urinary antigen testing in 202 (21.8%), and Legionella urinary antigen testing in 199 (21.5%) patients, with clear variation between hospitals. On presentation 556 (60.1%; range 33.3-73.4%) patients received antibiotics for a median duration of 2 days (IQR 1-4). Intravenous to oral switch was performed in 41 of 413 (9.9%) patients who received intravenous treatment >48 h. Mean adherence to the local guideline on empiric antibiotic therapy on day 1 was on average 60.3% (range 45.3%-74.7%). CONCLUSIONS: On presentation to the hospital bacterial co-infections are rare, while empiric antibiotic use is abundant. This implies that in patients with COVID-19 empiric antibiotic should be withheld. This has the potential to dramatically reduce the current overuse of antibiotics in the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Hemocultura , COVID-19/virologia , Coinfecção , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade
9.
Can J Rural Med ; 26(1): 14-18, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33380601

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are a commonly prescribed class of antibiotics in Canada. Evidence of a constellation of possible adverse events is developing. Central and peripheral nervous system abnormalities and collagen-related events (including aortic aneurysm/dissection, tendinopathy/rupture and retinal detachment) are associated with FQ exposure in large population-based aftermarket studies. In 2017, Health Canada warned about rare FQ-related persistent or disabling side effects. This study explores FQ use in a rural community. METHODS: Antibiotic prescriptions (including FQs) in the over 18 adult population (5416) were measured in the town of Sioux Lookout for 5 years, January 2013 to 31 December 2017. RESULTS: FQ prescriptions accounted for 16.0% of adult antibiotics, superseded by penicillins (21.1%) and macrolides (18.2%). Ciprofloxacin accounted for one half of FQ use (51.2%), followed by levofloxacin (36.7%) and norfloxacin (13.3%). FQs were commonly used for respiratory (33%) and urinary tract infections (18%). CONCLUSION: Aftermarket evidence reports increased risk of 'disabling and persistent serious adverse events'(Health Canada) in patients using FQs. Appropriate clinical caution should be exercised in the prescribing of FQs. Common overuse seems to occur in the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia and cystitis, despite recommendations to use other antimicrobial agents as first-line treatments.


Résumé Introduction: Les fluoroquinolones sont une classe d'antibiotiques souvent prescrite au Canada. Mais les données étayant une gamme d'événements indésirables possibles s'accumulent. Des anomalies du système nerveux central et périphérique, et des événements liés au collagène (dont anévrisme ou dissection de l'aorte, tendinopathie/rupture et décollement de la rétine) sont associés à l'exposition aux fluoroquinolones dans des études de pharmacovigilance d'envergure basées sur la population. En 2017, Santé Canada a émis une mise en garde au sujet des effets indésirables rares, persistants ou incapacitants liés aux fluoroquinolones. Cette étude se penche sur l'emploi de fluoroquinolones dans une communauté rurale. Méthodologie: La prescription d'antibiotiques (y compris de fluoroquinolones) a été mesurée dans la ville de Sioux Lookout pendant 5 ans, soit de janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2017 auprès de la population de 18 ans et plus (5416 personnes). Résultats: Les fluoroquinolones comptaient pour 16,0 % des antibiotiques prescrits aux adultes, elles étaient précédées des pénicillines (21,1 %) et des macrolides (18,2 %). La ciprofloxacine représentait la moitié de l'emploi de fluoroquinolones (51,2 %), suivie de la lévofloxacine (36,7 %) et de la norfloxacine (13,3 %). Les fluoroquinolones étaient fréquemment utilisées contre les infections respiratoires (33 %) et urinaires (18 %). Conclusion: Les données de pharmacovigilance rapportent un risque accru "d'événements indésirables graves persistants et incapacitants" (Santé Canada) chez les patients sous fluoroquinolones. La prudence clinique appropriée est de mise lors de la prescription de fluoroquinolones. La pneumonie extra-hospitalière non compliquée et la cystite semblent être à l'origine de la surutilisation, malgré les recommandations d'utiliser d'autres antimicrobiens en première intention. Mots-clés: Fluoroquinolones; antibiotiques; effets indésirables; rural.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Fluoroquinolonas/efeitos adversos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2029082, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33306117

RESUMO

Importance: Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) often take multiple medications to treat problematic symptoms. However, for children who cannot self-report symptoms, no system exists to assess multiple symptoms and their association with medication use. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of 28 distinct symptoms, test whether higher global symptom scores (GSS) were associated with use of more medications, and assess the associations between specific symptoms and medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, using structured parent-reported symptom data paired with clinical and pharmacy data, at a single-center, large, hospital-based special health care needs clinic. Participants included children aged 1 to 18 years with SNI and 5 or more prescribed medications. Data analysis was performed from April to June 2020. Exposure: During routine clinical visits, parent-reported symptoms were collected using the validated 28-symptom Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and merged with clinical and pharmacy data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptom prevalence, counts, and GSS (scored 0-100, with 100 being the worst) were calculated, and the association of GSS with medications was examined. To evaluate associations between symptom-medication pairs, the proportion of patients with a symptom who used a medication class or specific medication was calculated. Results: Of 100 patients, 55.0% were boys, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 9 (5-12) years, 62.0% had 3 or more complex chronic conditions, 76.0% took 10 or more medications, and none were able to complete the MSAS themselves. Parents reported a median (IQR) of 7 (4-10) concurrent active symptoms. The median (IQR) GSS was 12.1 (5.4-20.8) (range, 0.0-41.2) and the GSS was 9.8 points (95% CI, 5.5-14.1 points) higher for those with worse recent health than usual. Irritability (65.0%), insomnia (55.0%), and pain (54.0%) were the most prevalent symptoms. Each 10-point GSS increase was associated with 12% (95% CI, 4%-19%) higher medication counts, adjusted for age and complex chronic condition count. Among the 54.0% of children with reported pain, 61.0% were prescribed an analgesic. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that children with SNI reportedly experience substantial symptom burdens and that higher symptom scores are associated with increased medication use. Paired symptom-medication data may help clinicians identify targets for personalized symptom management, including underrecognized or undertreated symptoms.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso , Pais , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos , Avaliação de Sintomas , Sintomas Comportamentais/tratamento farmacológico , Sintomas Comportamentais/etiologia , Criança , Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Colorado/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/complicações , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/etiologia , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Avaliação de Sintomas/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 9(1): 159, 2020 09 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32977855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The overuse of antibiotics has been a major public health problem worldwide, especially in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC). However, there are few policies specific to antibiotic stewardship in primary care and their effectiveness are still unclear. A restrictive-prescribing stewardship targeting antibiotic use in primary care has been implemented since December 2014 in Hubei Province, China. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the restrictive-prescribing stewardship on antibiotic consumption in primary care so as to provide evidence-based suggestions for prudent use of antibiotics. METHODS: Monthly antibiotic consumption data were extracted from Hubei Medical Procurement Administrative Agency (HMPA) system from Sept 1, 2012, to Aug 31, 2017. Quality Indictors of European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC QIs) combined with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes and DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) methodology were applied to measure antibiotic consumption. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of restrictive-prescribing stewardship on antibiotic consumption. RESULTS: Over the entire study period, a significant reduction (32.58% decrease) was observed in total antibiotic consumption, which declined immediately after intervention (coefficient = - 2.4518, P = 0.005) and showed a downward trend (coefficient = - 0.1193, P = 0.017). Specifically, the use of penicillins, cephalosporins and macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins showed declined trends after intervention (coefficient = - 0.0553, P = 0.035; coefficient = - 0.0294, P = 0.037; coefficient = - 0.0182, P = 0.003, respectively). An immediate decline was also found in the contribution of ß-lactamase-sensitive penicillins to total antibiotic use (coefficient = - 2.9126, P = 0.001). However, an immediate increase in the contribution of third and fourth-generation cephalosporins (coefficient = 5.0352, P = 0.005) and an ascending trend in the contribution of fluoroquinolones (coefficient = 0.0406, P = 0.037) were observed after intervention. The stewardship led to an immediate increase in the ratio between broad- and narrow-spectrum antibiotic use (coefficient = 1.8747, P = 0.001) though they both had a significant downward trend (coefficient = - 0.0423, P = 0.017; coefficient = - 0.0223, P = 0.006, respectively). An immediate decline (coefficient = - 1.9292, P = 0.002) and a downward trend (coefficient = - 0.0815, P = 0.018) were also found in the oral antibiotic use after intervention, but no significant changes were observed in the parenteral antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive-prescribing stewardship in primary care was effective in reducing total antibiotic consumption, especially the use of penicillins, cephalosporins and macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins. However, the intervention effects were limited regarding the use of combinations of penicillins with ß-lactamase inhibitors, the third and fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and parenteral antibiotics. Stronger administrative regulations focusing on specific targeted antibiotics, especially the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and parenteral antibiotics, are in urgent need in the future.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Padrões de Prática Médica , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde
14.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 53(5): 905-913, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684287

RESUMO

In the last 30 years, pain control in the United States has undergone several evolutions impacting the care of surgical patients. More recently, safe pain control has been a subject of quality improvement efforts by otolaryngologists focusing on minimizing opioid consumption. This article discusses the rising overprescription of opioids, influenced by legislation and governmental agencies, and the steps taken to correct and reform policies to decrease the amount of opioids prescribed. Lastly, specific institutional examples of quality improvement protocols implemented to help decrease opioid consumption and prescription are discussed.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Epidemia de Opioides , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Manejo da Dor , Políticas , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estados Unidos
15.
J Infect Public Health ; 13(9): 1297-1303, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32554035

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic overuse is one of the major prescription problems in rural China and a major risk factor for antibiotic resistance. Low antibiotic prescription rates can effectively reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance. We hypothesized that under a paperless, computer-based feedback system the rates of antibiotic prescriptions among primary care physicians can be reduced. METHODS: A cluster randomized crossover open controlled trial was conducted in 31 hospitals. These hospitals were randomly allocated to two groups to receive the intervention for three months followed by no intervention for three months in a random sequence. The feedback intervention information, which displayed the physicians' antibiotic prescription rates and ranking, was updated every 10 days. The primary outcome was the 10-day antibiotic prescription rate of the physicians. RESULTS: There were 82 physicians in group 1 (intervention first followed by control) and 81 in group 2 (control first followed by intervention). Baseline comparison showed no significant difference in antibiotic prescription rate between the two groups (30.8% vs 35.2%, P-value=0.07). At the crossover point, the relative reduction in antibiotic prescription rate was significantly higher among physicians in the intervention group than in the control group (33.1% vs 20.3%, P-value<0.001). After a further 3 months, the rate of decline in antibiotic prescriptions was also significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (14.2% vs 4.6%, P-value<0.001). The characteristics of physicians did not significantly determine the change in rate of antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: A computer network-based feedback intervention can significantly reduce the antibiotic prescription rates of primary care outpatient physicians and continuously affected their prescription behavior for up to six months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021823.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Retroalimentação , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , China , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Cross-Over , Prescrição Eletrônica , Feminino , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Software , Adulto Jovem
16.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(3): 633-639, 2020 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421512

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a common indication for antibiotic use in the emergency department (ED). With antibiotic resistance on the rise, it is essential that antibiotics be prescribed appropriately for UTIs. Our objective was to evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions by ED providers for uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of females ages 2-50 years seen in an academic ED from January 2017 to April 2018 diagnosed with UTI. We assessed the appropriateness of discharge antibiotic prescriptions, as determined by adherence to clinical practice guidelines, best evidence for the particular indication (cystitis vs pyelonephritis for children and adults), and the local antibiogram. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were included in this study. Of these, 60 children and 198 adults were diagnosed with cystitis, and 47 children and 116 adults were diagnosed with pyelonephritis. Treatment in the absence of true infection was common, with culture-confirmed UTI occurring in only 17/50 (34%) of children and 60/129 (47%) of adults diagnosed with cystitis, and 23/40 (58%) of children and 58/87 (67%) of adults diagnosed with pyelonephritis, among patients who had urine cultures. The type of antibiotic prescribed was appropriate in 53/60 (88%) of children and 135/198 (68%) of adults with cystitis, and 38/47 (81%) of children and 53/116 (46%) of adults with pyelonephritis. The most common inappropriate antibiotic types were beta-lactams in adults (n = 92), nitrofurantoin for pyelonephritis (n = 16), and amoxicillin (n = 15). Dosing and duration errors were also common, occurring in 122/279 (44%) of prescriptions of an appropriate antibiotic type. The frequency of errors in the type of antibiotic prescribed was similar among provider types (attending physician, resident physician, and advanced practice clinician; p = 0.926). CONCLUSION: This study reveals room for improvement in antibiotic prescription practices across provider cohorts in the ED for the management of uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in females.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cistite , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos , Pielonefrite , Criança , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/epidemiologia , Cistite/microbiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/epidemiologia , Pielonefrite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 289, 2020 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306946

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive spectrum antibiotics such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, and linezolid are frequently used in empirical treatment combinations in critically ill patients. Such inappropriate and unnecessary widespread use, leads to sub-optimal utilisation. However they are covered by the antibiotics restriction programme. This prospective observational study, evaluates gram-positive anti-bacterial utilisations in intensive care units (ICUs) with various evaluation criteria, to determine the frequency of inappropriate usage and the intervention targets required to ensure optimum use. METHODS: This clinical study was conducted prospectively between 01.10.2018 and 01.10.2019 in the medical and surgical ICUs of Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Turkey. The total bed capacity was 55. Patients older than 18 years and who were prescribed gram-positive spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and daptomycin) were included. Patients under this age or immunosuppressed patients (neutropenic,- HIV-infected patients with hematologic or solid organ malignancies) were not included in the study. During the study period, 200 treatments were evaluated in 169 patients. The demographic and clinical features of the patients were recorded. Besides observations by the clinical staff, the treatments were recorded and evaluated by two infectious diseases specialists and two clinical pharmacists at 24-h intervals from the first day to the last day of treatment. SPSS software for Windows, (version 17, IBM, Armonk, NY) was used to analyse the data. Categorical variables were presented as number and percentage, and non-categorical variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: It was found that inappropriate gram-positive antibiotic use in ICUs was as high as 83% in terms of non-compliance with the selected quality parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic use, increased creatinine levels were found to increase the risk of such use. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the restricted antibiotics programme, inappropriate antibiotic use in ICUs is quite common. Thus, it is necessary to establish local guidelines in collaboration with different disciplines for the determination and follow-up of de-escalation of such use and optimal treatment doses.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/normas , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Turquia
18.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(9): 1090-1099, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311380

RESUMO

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to threaten global health. Although global and national AMR action plans are in place, infection prevention and control is primarily discussed in the context of health care facilities with home and everyday life settings barely addressed. As seen with the recent global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, everyday hygiene measures can play an important role in containing the threat from infectious microorganisms. This position paper has been developed following a meeting of global experts in London, 2019. It presents evidence that home and community settings are important for infection transmission and also the acquisition and spread of AMR. It also demonstrates that the targeted hygiene approach offers a framework for maximizing protection against colonization and infections, thereby reducing antibiotic prescribing and minimizing selection pressure for the development of antibiotic resistance. If combined with the provision of clean water and sanitation, targeted hygiene can reduce the circulation of resistant bacteria in homes and communities, regardless of a country's Human Development Index (overall social and economic development). Achieving a reduction of AMR strains in health care settings requires a mirrored reduction in the community. The authors call upon national and international policy makers, health agencies, and health care professionals to further recognize the importance of targeted hygiene in the home and everyday life settings for preventing and controlling infection, in a unified quest to tackle AMR.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Saúde Global/normas , Higiene/normas , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Saneamento/normas
19.
BMJ Open ; 10(4): e037912, 2020 04 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273322

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Psychotropic medications that are primarily licenced for the treatment of psychiatric disorders are used widely (32%-85%) among people with intellectual disabilities (ID) often for the management of problem (challenging) behaviour in the absence of a psychiatric disorder. Care staff play a pivotal role in the prescribing process. Currently, no staff training programme exists to address the issue of overprescribing of psychotropic medication in people with ID, thus highlighting an urgent need for developing a psychoeducational programme (PEP) specifically designed to address this issue. We propose to develop a PEP for care staff using the methodology described in the UK Medical Research Council guide for complex interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The development of the PEP will involve (1) gathering information on available relevant training programmes, (2) running four focus groups with care staff and other professionals to establish the content and format of the PEP, and (3) organising a co-design event involving all relevant stakeholders to discuss the format of the PEP. A core project team will develop the PEP under guidance from the PEP Development Group which will consist of 10-12 relevant stakeholder representatives. Feedback from selected stakeholders on a draft PEP will allow us to refine the PEP before implementation. The PEP will have web-based modules supplemented by face to face training sessions. When the final draft is ready, we will field test the PEP on six to eight care staff from community care homes for people with ID. After completing the field test, we will run a focus group involving participants in the PEP to get feedback on the PEP. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for this study was waived by the UK Health Regulatory Authority as the study does not collect any patient related information and only include care staff outside the UK NHS. This will be the first ever such universally freely available PEP supported by training manual and slides.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/educação , Deficiência Intelectual , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Psicotrópicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Programas
20.
Headache ; 60(5): 1021-1036, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32232847

RESUMO

The management of medication-overuse headache (MOH) is multifaceted and headache experts have different views on the optimal strategy to tackle this type of secondary headache. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the literature on the management of MOH, and to highlight important considerations in the clinical evaluation of the MOH patient. Managing MOH in clinical practice starts by evaluating the headache patient with medication overuse, determining the overused drug(s), assessing the impact of headaches on the patient and assessing comorbid conditions and disorders. Withdrawal of the overused medication is the cornerstone of treatment. An inpatient or outpatient setting is chosen based on the clinical profile of the patient. There is evidence for abrupt withdrawal combined with headache preventive treatment. Bridging therapy to bring relief to withdrawal headaches and/or symptoms should be offered. Education and motivational work through multidisciplinary assessment show benefits in sustaining withdrawal and preventing relapse. Although the reversal of chronic headache after cessation of overused acute medication has been noticed worldwide, different aspects of the management of MOH, such as complete or gradual withdrawal, or preventive treatment with or without withdrawal are still debated.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/terapia , Uso Excessivo de Medicamentos Prescritos/prevenção & controle , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...