The Psoriasis Treatment Pipeline: An Overview and Update.

Significant research advances in our understanding of psoriatic disease have led to the development of several highly selective, effective, and safe topical and systemic treatments. These treatments have led to unprecedented levels of disease clearance and control for most patients with psoriasis with cutaneous disease. However, there remains a need for improved treatments for those patients with recalcitrant disease, psoriatic arthritis, or nonplaque disease variants. Recently approved therapies and investigational products in ongoing clinical development programs that target IL-17A/F, IL-23, TYK2, PDE4, AhR or IL-36 cytokine signaling are improving the clinician's ability to care for a broader range of patients affected by psoriasis.

Biologics for Psoriasis.

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept), the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), the p19 subunit of IL-23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17-RA (brodalumab) and both IL-17A and IL-17F (bimekizumab) have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. In both the short and long term, risankizumab had highest Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 scores compared to other oral and injectable biologics. IL-23 inhibitors had lowest rates of short-term and long-term adverse events and most favorable long-term risk-benefit profile compared to IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors.

Evolving Landscape of Biologic Therapy for Pediatric Psoriasis.

Pediatric psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. Current treatment modalities include topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic drugs, including biological agents. In cases of moderate-to-severe psoriasis recalcitrant to other therapies, biological therapies are often an attractive option given their dosing schedules, safety profiles, and need for less frequent laboratory monitoring, when compared with traditional systemic therapies. This article reviews biological treatment options approved for pediatric psoriasis and identifies others actively under investigation.

Dose escalation of biologic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan.

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)-inhibiting biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL-inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post-induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non-persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL-inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS.

Fistulising skin metastases in Crohn's disease: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic Crohn's disease is a rare disorder characterized by various granulomatous skin lesions that occur independently of gastrointestinal tract involvement. However, currently there is no standardized care or specific treatment. Therapeutic approaches include immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, and monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor (TNF). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 29-year-old western European woman with significant blind ending abdominal subcutaneous fistulas and abscesses, who sought evaluation in the dermatology department. Histological examination revealed multiple epithelioid cell granulomas. There was no evidence of infectious or rheumatologic diseases such as sarcoidosis. The tentative diagnosis was metastatic Crohn's disease, which was not related to an intestinal manifestation of the disease. The patient responded to infliximab but had to discontinue it due to an allergic reaction. Subsequent adalimumab treatment failed to induce clinical remission; thus, therapy was switched to ustekinumab, resulting in a positive response. Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient. For our study more than 1600 publications were screened for cases of metastatic Crohn's disease on PubMed database. 59 case reports with 171 patients were included in the analysis and evaluated for localization, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and complications and were summarized in this review. CONCLUSION: The successful ustekinumab treatment of a patient with metastatic Crohn's disease underscores the potential of this minimally investigated therapeutic option, highlighting the need for future treatment guidelines given the increasing prevalence of such cases.

Insights into Therapeutic Response Prediction for Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis Using an Ensemble Bioinformatics Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing treatment with biological agents is an ideal goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent data suggest that mucosal inflammation patterns and serum cytokine profiles differ between patients who respond and those who do not. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, has shown promise, but predicting treatment response remains a challenge. We aimed to identify prognostic markers of response to ustekinumab in patients with active UC, utilizing information from their mucosal transcriptome. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 36 UC patients initiating treatment with ustekinumab. Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained before treatment initiation for a gene expression analysis using a microarray panel of 84 inflammatory genes. A differential gene expression analysis (DGEA), correlation analysis, and network centrality analysis on co-expression networks were performed to identify potential biomarkers. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were employed to predict treatment response based on gene expression data. RESULTS: Seven genes, including BCL6, CXCL5, and FASLG, were significantly upregulated, while IL23A and IL23R were downregulated in non-responders compared to responders. The co-expression analysis revealed distinct patterns between responders and non-responders, with key genes like BCL6 and CRP highlighted in responders and CCL11 and CCL22 in non-responders. The ML algorithms demonstrated a high predictive power, emphasizing the significance of the IL23R, IL23A, and BCL6 genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies potential biomarkers associated with ustekinumab response in UC patients, shedding light on its underlying mechanisms and variability in treatment outcomes. Integrating transcriptomic approaches, including gene expression analyses and ML, offers valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies and highlights avenues for further research to enhance therapeutic outcomes for patients with UC.

[Pouchitis showed complete response to ustekinumab].

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Although several agents, including probiotics, steroids, and immunomodulators, have been used, the treatment of pouchitis remains challenging. Owing to the proven efficacy of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease, there is now growing evidence suggesting the potential benefits of biological therapy in refractory pouchitis. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old woman with pouchitis due to ulcerative colitis who was successfully treated with ustekinumab (UST). The patient developed ulcerative pancolitis at the age of 35. Total colectomy and IPAA with J-pouch anastomosis were performed when the patient was 47 years old. Ileotomy closure was performed 6 months later. Postoperatively, the patient developed steroid-dependent pouchitis. Three years later, she developed steroid-induced diabetes. The patient has been taking 3mg of steroid for 20 years;therefore, her lifetime total steroid dose was 21g. The patient had over 20 episodes of bloody diarrhea a day. The last pouchoscopy in 20XX-9 revealed inflammatory stenosis with deep ulcerations of the afferent limb just before the ileoanal pouch junction. In July 20XX, when we took over her treatment, the policy of treatment was to withdraw her from steroids. Pouchoscopy revealed a widened but still tight afferent limb through which the scope could easily pass, and the ileoanal pouch still showed erosive ileitis without ulcers. Thiopurine administration and steroid tapering were initiated. Steroid tapering increased the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). As ESR increased, her arthritis exacerbated. Six months after the end of steroid administration, the patient consented to UST treatment. On April 20XX+1, the patient received her first 260-mg UST infusion. At this point, she experienced 14-15 episodes of muddy bloody stools. She had no abdominal pain;however, she experienced shoulder pain. Gradually, UST affected both pouchitis and arthritis. UST treatment was continued at 90mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks without abdominal pain recurrence. Eight months after the first UST infusion, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were no longer necessary for shoulder pain. Follow-up pouchoscopy performed 14 months after UST optimization revealed a normal afferent limb without ulcerations in either segment. Pouchitis remission was maintained for over 2 years.

Meta-analysis: Persistence of advanced therapies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: The expanding options in advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) present challenges in treatment selection. Persistence analysis assesses drug durability in real-world settings, acting as a surrogate marker for medication efficacy and tolerance. Unlike traditional comparative studies, persistence analysis provides insights extending beyond the initial year of treatment. AIM: To provide real-world evidence on treatment effectiveness, tolerability and preferences of physicians and patients regarding various advanced therapies for IBD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies up to March 2023 assessing advanced therapies' persistence in UC and CD. Advanced therapies under examination included infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, golimumab, certolizumab and tofacitinib. We pooled the persistence of each agent and conducted a meta-analysis to compare the persistence of newer agents with traditional TNF inhibitors (TNFi)-specifically infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: Among 63 observational studies, vedolizumab had the highest 1-year persistence in UC (73.8%, 95% CI: 70.0%-77.6%) and ustekinumab in CD (77.5%, 95% CI: 72.9%-82.1%). Compared to TNFi, vedolizumab demonstrated increased persistence with a relative risk (RR) of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19-1.41) for UC and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.20) for CD at 1 year, while ustekinumab demonstrated a RR of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for CD at 1 year. Vedolizumab exhibited sustained increased persistence in UC over 2 years compared to TNFi (RR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights the superior persistence of ustekinumab and vedolizumab over TNFi, and offers valuable insights for clinicians navigating the challenging landscape of UC and CD therapeutic choices.

[Clinical remission and transmural healing of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease].

OBJECTIVE: To treat the Crohn's disease (CD) patients with ustekinumab (UST), to eva-luate their clinical and endoscopic remission, and to evaluate their transmural response (TR) and transmural healing (TH) condition using intestinal ultrasonography (IUS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was made on patients diagnosed with CD in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2020 to August 2022, who were treated with UST for remission induction and maintenance therapy. All the patients were evaluated on both week 8 and week 16/20 after treatment, including clinical, biochemical indicators, colonoscopy and IUS examination. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled in this study, including 11 males and 2 females. The minimum age was 23 years, the maximum age was 73 years and the mean age was 36.92 years. All the patients were in the active stage of disease before treatment, and the average Best Crohn's disease activity index (Best CDAI) score was 270.12±105.55. In week 8, the Best CDAI score of the patients decreased from 270.12±105.55 to 133.16±48.66 (t=4.977, P < 0.001). Eight patients achieved clinical remission while 5 patients remained in the active stage. Nine patients underwent colonoscopy evaluation. The average simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score decreased from 10.71±7.14 before treatment to 6.00±7.81(t=2.483, P=0.048) in week 16/20. Four patients achieved endoscopic remission while 5 patients did not. In week 8, 5 patients achieved TR, 2 patients achieved TH, the other 6 patients did not get TR or TH. In week 16/20, 6 patients achieved TR, 3 patients achieved TH while the other 4 patients did not get TR or TH. There was no significant statistical difference in the TR effect of UST between small intestine and colon lesions (Fisher test, P > 0.999). The rate of UST transmural response in the patients who had had previous biological agent therapy was lower than those with no previous biological agent therapy, but there was no significant statistical difference (Fisher test, P=0.491). CONCLUSION: After treatment of UST, the clinical and endoscopic conditions of the CD patients had been improved, and some patients could achieve clinical remission and endoscopic remission. UST had good TR and TH effects on CD. TR might appear in week 8, and the TR effect increased in week 16/20. There was no significant statistical difference in the TR effect between small intestine and colon lesions. TR effect of UST was better in the patients who had no previous biological agent therapy than those who had had other biological agents, but the result had no significant statistical difference.

Ustekinumab effectiveness in Crohn's disease with lesions in the intestines.

Ustekinumab is prescribed for the treatment of patients with steroid-resistant moderate to severe Crohn's disease. We investigated its clinical outcome in patients with small and large intestinal lesions. Patients who were newly administered ustekinumab between March 2014 and December 2020 at Hamamatsu University Hospital were included in the study. The primary endpoint was Crohn's disease activity index score at baseline and weeks 8, 24, and 48 after the initiation of treatment, and secondary endpoints were albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein at these time points. Ustekinumab treatment retention was examined in both groups; the 2 groups were compared using the Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher exact test. Overall, Crohn's disease activity index scores improved between baseline and 48 weeks, but the difference was not significant. However, there was a significant improvement between baseline and 48 weeks in patients with lesions in the small intestine only. Overall, patients showed significant improvement in albumin levels between baseline and 48 weeks but not in C-reactive protein or hemoglobin levels. When limited to patients with lesions in the small intestine, albumin and hemoglobin levels showed significant improvement. Both types showed high rates of treatment retention, although there was no significant difference. Ustekinumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment option that may be particularly effective in patients with lesions in the small intestine only.

Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings. AIM: We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres. METHODS: We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres. RESULTS: The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres ( P  = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P  = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Real-world clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease treated with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world treatment persistence, dose escalation, rates of opportunistic or serious infections, and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving vedolizumab (VDZ) vs ustekinumab (UST) in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective observational study in adults with CD initiated on VDZ or UST on/after 26 September 2016, was performed using the IBM Truven Health MarketScan databases (1 January 2009-30 September 2018). Rates of treatment persistence, dose escalation, opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters, and healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were evaluated. Entropy balancing was used to balance patient characteristics between cohorts. Event rates were assessed using weighted Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared between cohorts using log-rank tests. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using weighted 2-part models. RESULTS: 589 VDZ and 599 UST patients were included (172 [29.2%] and 117 [19.5%] were bio-naïve, respectively). After weighting, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. No significant difference in rates of treatment persistence (12-month: VDZ, 76.5%; UST, 82.1%; p = .17), dose escalation (12-month: VDZ, 29.3%; UST, 32.7%; p = .97), or opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters were observed between VDZ and UST. Total mean healthcare costs were significantly lower for patients treated with VDZ vs UST (mean cost difference = -$5051 PPPM; p < .01). Findings were consistent in bio-naïve patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, similar treatment persistence, dose escalation, and rates of opportunistic or serious infections were observed with VDZ- and UST-treated patients with CD. However, VDZ was associated with a significantly lower cost outlay for healthcare systems.

Crohn's disease (CD) causes inflammation in the digestive system. Vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are therapies for patients with CD. Little is known about the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of VDZ versus UST in the real world in the United States. We used health claims data and found that VDZ and UST had comparable real-world clinical outcomes. After 12 months of treatment, the proportions of patients with CD who stayed on treatment and those who needed to increase therapy dose were similar with VDZ and UST. The rate of infection was also similar between the two groups of patients. However, the monthly healthcare costs were $5051 less for patients treated with VDZ than with UST. This was mainly due to the lower cost of VDZ, which was almost half of that of UST. The lower treatment costs with VDZ may provide substantial savings for the healthcare system and patients specifically. Future cost-effectiveness studies on VDZ and UST are needed to aid treatment selection for patients with CD.

Short-term effectiveness and potential factors of ustekinumab based on real-world data in Chinese psoriasis patients.

BACKGROUND: As one of the most effective biologic treatments for psoriasis, the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab has yet to be studied extensively. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness and potential factors within four weeks after the first-dose ustekinumab treatment based on real-world data. METHODS: The study enrolled 98 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, given ustekinumab 45 mg at week 0, week 4, and then every 12 weeks. Based on clinical data collected at baseline and week 4, we investigated the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab after the first dose and potential factors associated with the treatment. For evaluation, we collected demographic information, body data, medical history, laboratory examination results, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Response rates were calculated based on the number of patients that achieved a 75/90/100% reduction in PASI (PASI 75/90/100), and the primary treatment goal was to achieve PASI 75. RESULTS: The response rates for PASI 75/90/100 at week 4 were 30.5%, 18.9%, and 16.8%, respectively. For PASI 75, the response rate was higher in patients without metabolic syndrome (MS) (without MS vs. with MS: 36.9% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.013); the serum triglyceride (TG) level was significantly lower in patients achieving PASI 75 (expressed as mean ± standard deviation, achieved vs. unachieved: 1.82 ± 1.79 vs. 3.59 ± 8.89, p = 0.010). For PASI 100, the response rates were higher in female patients (female vs. male: 26.3% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.044) and patients with a family history of psoriasis (with family history vs. without family history: 44.4% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.042). In addition, the possibility of achieving PASI 75/90/100 went up along with the serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level (expressed as adjusted odds ratio < 95% confidence interval>: PASI 75: 28.484 < 2.035-248.419>, p = 0.011; PASI 90: 28.226 < 2.828-281.729>, p = 0.004; PASI 100: 12.175 < 1.876-79.028>, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In this study, nearly one-third of patients achieved PASI 75 after only the first-dose ustekinumab treatment. Sex, family history of psoriasis, MS, serum TG level might affect the short-term effectiveness, and serum HDL-C level may be a potential factor. The possibility of achieving treatment goals (PASI 75/90/100) at week 4 increased along with serum HDL-C levels.

Case report: Successful treatment of ulcerative colitis-related post-colectomy enteritis refractory to multiple therapies with ustekinumab.

Ulcerative colitis-related severe post-colectomy enteritis is a rare condition. A few cases have undergone successful treatment with corticosteroids, Cyclosporine, Azathioprine, and Infliximab. We aim to evaluate the treatment outcome of ustekinumab in this rare case. Here we describe a 56-year-old woman with post-colectomy enteritis refractory to multiple therapies. Finally, the patient was administered with ustekinumab treatment. Under monitoring, the feces volume of the patient decreased from 5000-7000 mL per day to 1700-2000 mL. Over a one-year follow-up period, the patient gradually gained body weight, with the stoma drainage of formed brown stool. And the villi of the small intestinal mucosa restore growth. To our knowledge, this is the first report that indicates ustekinumab could be a treatment selection for ulcerative colitis-related severe post-colectomy enteritis.

Research progress of Ustekinumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, recurrent gastrointestinal disorder with elusive etiology. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-23 have emerged as key proinflammatory mediators/cytokines in IBD pathogenesis. Ustekinumab (UST), targeting IL-12 and IL-23, has demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of IBD. Recently, UST has become increasingly favored as a potential first-line treatment option. This review delineates UST's mechanism of action, its clinical applications in IBD, including the response rates, strategies for dose optimization for case of partial or lost response, and potential adverse events. This review aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of UST's role as a therapeutic option in IBD management.

Biologics for Treatment of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the published efficacy and adverse event rates associated with existing biologics for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP). DATA SOURCES: A literature review using the PubMed database (January 1990-July 2023) was conducted. Multiple search combinations were conducted using "pityriasis rubra pilaris" and various biologics as keywords to identify relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Inclusion criteria included all study types that were published within the past 30 years in English and mentioned at least one biologic and PRP. A preliminary search yielded a total of 499 results. After screening using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 relevant articles (69 case reports, 5 case series, 2 clinical trials, and 1 retrospective analysis) were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: TNF-α inhibitors have been evaluated and are effective in treating PRP. However, recent treatment with anti-interleukin (IL)-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies such as ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are emerging as new treatment options with a mean improvement in PRP Area and Severity Index scores, change in severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness of PRP lesions. From initial clinical trials, secukinumab and ixekizumab are promising treatment options for achieving remission. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review compares the efficacy for numerous biologics and a discussion to guide clinicians on benefits and risks in choosing a biologic for PRP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics may be a favourable treatment option leading to greater patient adherence due to reduced dosing frequencies, improvement in quality of life, and reduction in frequency and severity of flares.

Real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in TNF-exposed pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: Vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are second-line treatments in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Pediatric studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications are lacking. Using a registry from ImproveCareNow (ICN), a global research network in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, we compared the effectiveness of UST and VDZ in anti-TNF refractory UC. METHODS: We performed a propensity-score weighted regression analysis to compare corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at 6 months from starting second-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of our findings to different ways of handling missing outcome data. Secondary analyses evaluated alternative proxies of response and infection risk. RESULTS: Our cohort included 262 patients on VDZ and 74 patients on UST. At baseline, the two groups differed on their mean pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) (p = 0.03) but were otherwise similar. At Month 6, 28.3% of patients on VDZ and 25.8% of those on UST achieved CFCR (p = 0.76). Our primary model showed no difference in CFCR (odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.59) (p = 0.54). The time to biologic discontinuation was similar in both groups (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.76-2.08) (p = 0.36), with the reference group being VDZ, and we found no differences in clinical response, growth parameters, hospitalizations, surgeries, infections, or malignancy risk. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings of similar effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: UST and VDZ are similarly effective for inducing clinical remission in anti-TNF refractory UC in pediatric patients. Providers should consider safety, tolerability, cost, and comorbidities when deciding between these therapies.

Selection strategy of second-line biologic therapies in adult patients with ulcerative colitis following prior biologic treatment failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing second-line biologic therapies for adult ulcerative colitis (UC) post first-line failure is essential. OBJECTIVE: Compare second-line biologic therapy efficacy in adult UC patients with prior treatment failure. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases up to May 2023 was conducted to assess second-line biologic therapy efficacy using a random effects model. Parameters analyzed included clinical remission rate, clinical response rate, mucosal healing rate, annual discontinuation rate, and colectomy rates. RESULTS: Forty-three research papers were analyzed. Clinical remission rates for second-line biologics were ranked at 6-14 weeks: Infliximab (30%) was followed by Vedolizumab (29%), Ustekinumab (27%), and Adalimumab (19%). At 52-54 weeks, the order shifted, with Vedolizumab (35%) followed by Infliximab (32%), Ustekinumab (31%), and Adalimumab (26%). The mucosal healing rate was 21%, ranked as: Infliximab (31%), Vedolizumab (21%), Adalimumab (21%), and Ustekinumab (14%). The annual discontinuation rate stood at 20%, with Adalimumab (25%), Vedolizumab (18%), Infliximab (17%), and Ustekinumab (16%). Discontinuation rates due to primary failure (PF), secondary failure (SF), and adverse events (AE) were 6%, 12%, and 3%, respectively. The annual colectomy rate was 9%, with Adalimumab (15%) followed by Vedolizumab (10%), Ustekinumab (9%), and Infliximab (5%), and colectomy rates of 10% due to PF, 12% due to SF, and 4% due to AE. CONCLUSION: For UC patients with first-line treatment failure, it is recommended to prioritize infliximab or vedolizumab as second-line biologic therapies, while avoiding adalimumab as the primary choice. Further clinical trials are necessary to assess ustekinumab efficacy accurately.