A vein-viewing application enabled detecting abdominal wall varices related to the presence of non-treated gastroesophageal varices: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal varices (GOV) are a life-threatening complication in chronic liver disease. A method for non-invasively predicting GOV is crucial for management. This study aimed to determine whether a vein-viewing application can detect abdominal wall varices (AWV) and elucidate the relationship between AWV and GOV. METHODS: One-hundred patients with chronic liver diseases were prospectively enrolled. All the patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy within three months of the enrollment. Unmanipulated images (UI) and vein-weighted images (VWI) were taken for assessing AWV by a vein-viewing application on iPhone. Two doctors independently evaluated both image types. We defined the grading of both UI and AWV as grade 0 (non-detectable), grade 1 (slightly detectable), and grade 2 (distinct). RESULTS: The causes of liver diseases among the 71 men and 29 women (median age, 70.5 yr) included Hepatitis B (n = 19), Hepatitis C (n = 21), alcoholism (n = 33), primary biliary cholangitis (n = 3), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 4) and others (n = 20). GOV was indicated in 60 patients, and half of them had not been treated previously (non-treated). VWI could significantly visualize AWV than UI (72% vs. 24%, p = 0.0005). The presence of cirrhosis (chronic hepatitis vs. cirrhosis = 64.6% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.004) and GOV (52.3% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.032) were significantly higher in the VWI-AWV grade 2 group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VWI-AWV grade 2 was an independent factor related to the presence of non-treated GOV [OR = 3.05 (1.24-7.53), p = 0.016]. CONCLUSIONS: The vein-viewing application non-invasively detected AWV related to the presence of cirrhosis and GOV, and VWI-AWV grade 2 was an independent factor related to the presence of non-treated GOV.

The Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology classification of pelvic venous disorders: A report of the American Vein & Lymphatic Society International Working Group on Pelvic Venous Disorders.

As the importance of pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) has been increasingly recognized, progress in the field has been limited by the lack of a valid and reliable classification instrument. Misleading historical nomenclature, such as the May-Thurner, pelvic congestion, and nutcracker syndromes, often fails to recognize the interrelationship of many pelvic symptoms and their underlying pathophysiology. Based on a perceived need, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel charged with the development of a discriminative classification instrument for PeVD. This instrument, the Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology ("SVP") classification for PeVD, includes three domains-Symptoms (S), Varices (V), and Pathophysiology (P), with the pathophysiology domain encompassing the Anatomic (A), Hemodynamic (H), and Etiologic (E) features of the patient's disease. An individual patient's classification is designated as SVPA,H,E. For patients with pelvic origin lower extremity signs or symptoms, the SVP instrument is complementary to and should be used in conjunction with the Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic (CEAP) classification. The SVP instrument accurately defines the diverse patient populations with PeVD, an important step in improving clinical decision making, developing disease-specific outcome measures and identifying homogenous patient populations for clinical trials.

The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards.

The CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) classification is an internationally accepted standard for describing patients with chronic venous disorders and it has been used for reporting clinical research findings in scientific journals. Developed in 1993, updated in 1996, and revised in 2004, CEAP is a classification system based on clinical manifestations of chronic venous disorders, on current understanding of the etiology, the involved anatomy, and the underlying venous pathology. As the evidence related to these aspects of venous disorders, and specifically of chronic venous diseases (CVD, C2-C6) continue to develop, the CEAP classification needs periodic analysis and revisions. In May of 2017, the American Venous Forum created a CEAP Task Force and charged it to critically analyze the current classification system and recommend revisions, where needed. Guided by four basic principles (preservation of the reproducibility of CEAP, compatibility with prior versions, evidence-based, and practical for clinical use), the Task Force has adopted the revised Delphi process and made several changes. These changes include adding Corona phlebectatica as the C4c clinical subclass, introducing the modifier "r" for recurrent varicose veins and recurrent venous ulcers, and replacing numeric descriptions of the venous segments by their common abbreviations. This report describes all these revisions and the rationale for making these changes.

[Endoluminal Treatment of Varicose Veins: Value of Duplex Ultrasound (Part 2)]. / Endoluminale Varikosebehandlung: Stellenwert der Duplexsonografie (Teil 2).

Part one addressed the value of duplex ultrasound in the diagnostic workup of varicosis. The present article discusses the use of preinterventional, intrainterventional and postinterventional duplex ultrasound in endoluminal methods for the treatment of varices. It is a prerequisite for the planning, implementation, and follow-up of this form of therapy.

[Surgery of varicose vein insufficiency]. / Operative Therapie der Varikose.

The basis of surgery of great saphenous vein insufficiency is the concept of "privat circulation" coined by Trendelenburg in 1891. It was only logical that the dissection of the insuffcient vein or it's partial or complete resection could bring about healing. Over the years varicose vein stripping was modified to finally result in the highly effectiv concept of crossectomy and stripping. For decades this was the Goldstandard in surgery of varicose vein insufficiency. All the other minimally invasive therapeutic techniques which have been developed in the last decades had to compete with crossectomy and stripping. Thanks to progress in technical development the classic stripping procedure has been replaced by highly effectiv, minimally invasiv procedures, at least in the western industrialisied countries. For a minority of patients with specific anatomical pathologies as well as countries with limited health resources vein stripping remains a surgical standard procedure.

[Epidemiology of chronic venous diseases]. / Epidemiologie der chronischen Venenkrankheiten.

AIM: Overview of the recent knowledge in epidemiology of chronic venous diseases. METHODS: Systematic search and discussion of recent studies concerning epidemiology of chronic venous diseases. RESULTS: The more recent epidemiologic studies of venous diseases in which the CEAP classification was used showed a prevalence of 60-70 % CEAP clinical class C0 and C1, app. 25 % for C2 and C3 and up to 5 % for C4 to C6 with skin changes or venous ulcers. The incidence of varicose veins is app. 2 % per year. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic venous diseases like varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency belong to the most frequent diseases in our adult population.

[Etiology, nomenclature and pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency]. / Ätiologie, Nomenklatur und Pathophysiologie der chronisch venösen Insuffizienz.

This article presents current notions and conceptions of the aetiopathogenesis of primary varicosis and chronic venous insufficiency, as well as an updated version of the nomenclature and terminology of venous disorders, which was recently agreed on in an international consensus conference. Furthermore, both CEAP-classification and venous severity score system are discussed.

The wound/burn guidelines - 5: Guidelines for the management of lower leg ulcers/varicose veins.

Varicose veins are treated at multiple clinical departments, but as patients often visit the dermatology clinic first due to leg ulcers, the present Guidelines for the Management of Lower Leg Ulcers/Varicose Veins were prepared in consideration of the importance of the dermatologist's role. Also, the disease concept of chronic venous insufficiency or chronic venous disorders and the CEAP classification of these disorders are presented. The objective of the present guidelines is to properly guide the diagnosis and treatment of lower leg ulcers/varicose veins by systematically presenting evidence-based recommendations that support clinical decisions.

A randomized trial comparing treatments for varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation are widely used alternatives to surgery for the treatment of varicose veins, but their comparative effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. METHODS: In a randomized trial involving 798 participants with primary varicose veins at 11 centers in the United Kingdom, we compared the outcomes of foam, laser, and surgical treatments. Primary outcomes at 6 months were disease-specific quality of life and generic quality of life, as measured on several scales. Secondary outcomes included complications and measures of clinical success. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline scores and other covariates, the mean disease-specific quality of life was slightly worse after treatment with foam than after surgery (P=0.006) but was similar in the laser and surgery groups. There were no significant differences between the surgery group and the foam or the laser group in measures of generic quality of life. The frequency of procedural complications was similar in the foam group (6%) and the surgery group (7%) but was lower in the laser group (1%) than in the surgery group (P<0.001); the frequency of serious adverse events (approximately 3%) was similar among the groups. Measures of clinical success were similar among the groups, but successful ablation of the main trunks of the saphenous vein was less common in the foam group than in the surgery group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality-of-life measures were generally similar among the study groups, with the exception of a slightly worse disease-specific quality of life in the foam group than in the surgery group. All treatments had similar clinical efficacy, but complications were less frequent after laser treatment and ablation rates were lower after foam treatment. (Funded by the Health Technology Assessment Programme of the National Institute for Health Research; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51995477.).

More great saphenous vein valves - less varicose veins?

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) the number of venous valves and the degree of valve deterioration have not been extensively investigated and are poorly understood. The aim of this prospective study was to quantitatively and qualitatively investigate the venous valves in CVD patients in view of their clinical classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within two years a consecutive series of 152 patients (223 limbs) undergoing primary surgery for great saphenous vein varicose veins was investigated. In all patients the 'C' class according to the basic CEAP-classification was registered preoperatively (C2 to C6) for each limb. Both the quantity and quality of venous valves were assessed in the GSV's after removal. Qualitative evaluation of the valves was based on macroscopic appearance using a classification from 0 to 5 and described as 'valve disease class'. RESULTS: A negative correlation between age and the number of valves was detected (p = 0.0035). There was an increase of C-class with increasing age. No significant correlation between the average number of valves per meter and the C-class was detected. For all C-classes an average of between four and five valves per meter was counted. Valve disease class was positively correlated with the C-class although the valve disease class was never higher than the C-class (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The valve disease class of the great saphenous vein correlates with the C-class of the CEAP-classification. The number of valves did not correlate with the 'C'-class. With each increase in the CEAP class the age increased as well.

The Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire, patient factors and referral for treatment.

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) could be used to help inform a patient pathway for referral and treatment of varicose veins. We aimed to determine 1) which patient and vein characteristics affected the AVVQ score, and 2) whether scores differed between those who were and were not offered treatment. METHODS: Patients completed the AVVQ at the clinic prior to being seen. Treatment was offered to patients with symptoms, and duplex detected truncal incompetence by surgeons blinded to the score. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive patients completed the AVVQ: 199 were valid questionnaires. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a worse quality of life were female gender (p = .034, 3.14 mean unit increase in AVVQ), and bilateral varicose veins (10.25 unit increase, p < .001). For patients with C2 disease, only the presence of bilateral veins was significant. Overall, the AVVQ score was higher in those patients offered treatment than in those who were not (mean 20.3 [SD = 9.9] vs. 17.3 [SD = 10.3], p = .023), which equates to a 2.74 unit increase. This was not significant in patients with C2 disease. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely that a threshold AVVQ score could be used to aid referral of patients with C2 disease. The distribution of veins (unilateral vs. bilateral) must be adjusted for when reporting AVVQ scores.

[Russian observational programme SPEKTR: analysis of age-specific structure of patients with chronic venous diseases].

The authors studied the age-related structure of 864 patients with chronic venous diseases (CVD) by means of analysing the database of the Russian Programme SPEKTR (2011-2012). Most often special medical care was sought by persons of able-bodied age (31-60 years): men - 60.6%, women - 63.8%. Class C1 in women was registered at the age under 20 years in 49.5% of cases, in elder groups - from 66.4% to 76.1%. In men, it was registered 1.3-2-8 times less often in all age groups. Class C2 amounted to 75% of cases in women under 20 years; then 50% (21-30 years), increasing to 79.6% (61-70 years). Class C2 in men under 20 years was observed in 100%, then the proportion fluctuated within the bounds of 80% irrespective of the age. The maximum of registering C3 fell to the age of 41-50 years (women - 48%, men - 53.2%). The number of severe forms (C4-C6) in men was considerably more: 31-40 years - 20.2% versus 4.7% in women; 41-50 years - 59.6% versus 17.3%; 51-60 years - 46.7% versus 29.4%. Trophic ulcers were revealed in men most often at the age of 31 - 60 years - 22% in women in the analogous group - 4.9%. The anamnesis of CVD increased with age. Adequate treatment for CVD in all age groups prior to the visit to the phleblogist had been carried out very rarely.

Patterns of reflux in the great saphenous vein system.

OBJECTIVE: To report the patterns of reflux in the great saphenous vein as well as to investigate the correlations between patterns of reflux, the demographics and the clinical findings in the population studied. METHODS: A total of 1882 limbs were assessed by duplex ultrasound examination in 1449 patients (348 men and 1101 women). Ages ranged from 21 to 94 years (mean 51.8). The presence of symptoms of venous disease (aching, heaviness, night cramps, swelling, itching, burning, tingling and throbbing) and clinical signs were recorded. RESULTS: Varicose veins without saphenous reflux occurred at a younger age (43 versus 55.6 years P < 0.05). The presence of incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction occurred in older patients (58.5 versus 54.1 years P < 0.05). Venous reflux to the ankle also occurred in older patients (mean 64.0 years P < 0.05). Saphenous vein reflux without clinical varices was associated with more advanced signs (C4-C6: 20.3% P < 0.05). A younger age was associated with less advanced signs (C0-C2:49.4 versus C4-C6: 60.1 years P < 0.05). Presence of symptoms was associated with advancing patient age (51.1 versus 49.1 years P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation between the extent of great saphenous vein reflux and the patient age and the clinical stage of SVI has been observed in this study. The authors hypothesize that these findings support the concept of early treatment of venous insufficiency before symptomatic and physiological deterioration occurs.

Pattern and types of non-saphenous vein reflux.

Venous reflux often originates from saphenous trunks and their tributaries. In about 10% of the patients reflux derived from non-saphenous veins (NSV) such as those located in the buttock, postero-lateral thigh, vulva, lower posterior thigh, popliteal fossa, knee or along the peripheral nerves such as the tibial and sciatic nerve. It is also important to note that patients who had saphenous vein stripping or ablation have higher odds of presenting with NSV reflux. The majority of patients with NSV reflux have varicose veins and lower extremity oedema; however, about 10% of those patients present with skin damage. This paper analyses the patterns and types of NSV reflux for diagnosis and treatment purposes.

Great saphenous vein diameter at the saphenofemoral junction and proximal thigh as parameters of venous disease class.

BACKGROUND: Great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence is involved in the majority of cases of varicose disease. Standardised pre-interventional assessment is required to analyse the relative merit of treatment modalities. We weighed GSV diameter measurement at the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) against measurement at the proximal thigh 15 cm distal to the groin (PT), established a conversion factor and applied it to selected literature data. METHODS: Legs with untreated isolated GSV reflux and varices limited to its territory and control legs were studied clinically, with duplex ultrasound and photoplethysmography. GSV diameters were measured at both the SFJ and the PT. A conversion factor was calculated and used to compare published data. RESULTS: Of 182 legs, 60 had no GSV reflux (controls; group I), 51 had above-knee GSV reflux only (group II) and 71 had GSV reflux above and below knee (group III). GSV diameters in group I measured 7.5 mm (± 1.8) at the SFJ and 3.7 mm (± 0.9) at the PT. In groups II and III, they measured 10.9 mm (± 3.9) at the SFJ and 6.3 mm (± 1.9) at the PT (p < 0.001 each). Measurement at the PT revealed higher sensitivity and specificity to predict reflux and clinical class. Good correlation between sites of measurement (r = 0.77) allowed a conversion factor (SFJ = 1.767 * PT, PT = 0.566*SFJ) to be applied to pre-interventional data of published studies. CONCLUSIONS: GSV diameter correlates with clinical class, measurement at the PT being more sensitive and more specific than measurement at the SFJ. Applying the conversion factor to published data suggests that some studies included patients with minor disease.

Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program.

AIM: The Vein Consult Program is an international, observational, prospective survey aiming to collect global epidemiological data on chronic venous disorders (CVD) based on the CEAP classification, and to identify CVD management worldwide. The survey was organized within the framework of ordinary consultations, with general practitioners (GPs) properly trained on the use of the CEAP classification. METHODS: Screening for CVD was to be performed by enrolling in the survey all consecutive outpatients >18 years whatever the reason for consultation, to record patient's data and classify them according to the CEAP, from the stage C0s to C6. The program enrolled 6232 GPs 91545 subjects were analysed. Their mean age was 50.6±16.9 years, younger patients being in the Middle East and older ones in Europe, and the proportion of women was higher than that of men. RESULTS: The worldwide prevalence of CVD was 83.6%: 63.9% of the subjects ranging C1 to C6, and 19.7% being C0s subjects. C0s patients were more frequently men whatever the age and the geographical zone. C1-C3 appeared to be more frequent among women whatever the country but the rate of severe stages (C4-C6) did not differ between men and women. GPs consider CVD subjects as patients eligible to specialist referral beginning from C2 but some geographical disparities were observed. CONCLUSION: The VCP survey provides reliable results on CVD global epidemiology and shows that CVD affects a significant part of the populations worldwide, underlining the importance of adequate screening for CVD and training of both GPs and specialist physicians.