A comparison of technicques to disimpact the fetal head on a second stage caesearean simulator.

BACKGROUND: The rate of second stage caesarean section (CS) is rising with associated increases in maternal and neonatal morbidity, which may be related to impaction of the fetal head in the maternal pelvis. In the last 10 years, two devices have been developed to aid disimpaction and reduce these risks: the Fetal Pillow (FP) and the Tydeman Tube (TT). The aim of this study was to determine the distance of upward fetal head elevation achieved on a simulator for second stage CS using these two devices, compared to the established technique of per vaginum digital disimpaction by an assistant. METHODS: We measured elevation of the fetal head achieved with the two devices (TT and FP), compared to digital elevation, on a second stage Caesearean simulator (Desperate Debra ™ set at three levels of severity. Elevation was measured by both a single operator experienced with use of the TT and FP and also multiple assistants with no previous experience of using either device. All measurements were blinded RESULTS: The trained user achieved greater elevation of the fetal head at both moderate and high levels of severity with the TT (moderate: 30mm vs 12.5mm p<0.001; most severe: 25mm vs 10mm p<0.001) compared to digital elevation. The FP provided comparable elevation to digital at both settings (moderate: 10 vs 12.5mm p=0.149; severe 10 vs 10mm p=0.44). With untrained users, elevation was also significantly greater with the TT compared to digital elevation (20mm vs 10mm p<0.01). However digital disimpaction was significantly greater than the FP (10mm vs 0mm p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: On a simulator, with trained operators, the TT provided greater fetal head elevation than digital elevation and the FP. The FP achieved similar elevation to the digital technique, especially when the user was trained in the procedure.

Clinical effectiveness of position management and manual rotation of the fetal position with a U-shaped birth stool for vaginal delivery of a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of position management, manual rotation of the fetal position, and using a U-shaped birth stool in primiparous women with a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position. METHODS: This was a prospective pilot study of women who delivered at Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital between January and June 2018. The women were divided into the position management ([PM] position management, manual rotation of fetal position, use of a U-shaped birth stool at different stages, and routine nursing) and control groups (position selected by women and routine nursing). RESULTS: There were 196 women in the PM group and 188 in the control group. There were no significant differences in maternal age, gestational weeks, newborn weight, and the neonatal asphyxia rate between the PM and control groups. The duration of labor was shorter in the PM group than in the control group. Pain and blood loss 2 hours after delivery and the episiotomy rate were significantly lower in the PM group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Applying position management, manual rotation of the fetal position, and using a U-shaped birth stool should be considered for women with a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position.

Management of persistent occiput posterior position: a substantial role of instrumental rotation in the setting of failed manual rotation.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with Instrumental Rotation (IR) to operative vaginal delivery in occiput posterior (OP) position with Thierry's spatulas (TS), in the setting of failed manual rotation (MR). STUDY DESIGN: We led a prospective observational cohort study in a tertiary referral hospital in Toulouse, France. All women presenting in labor with persistent OP position at full cervical dilatation and who delivered vaginally after failed MR and with IR or OP assisted delivery were included from January 2014 to December 2015. The main outcomes measured were maternal morbidity parameters including episiotomy rate, incidence and severity of perineal lacerations, perineal hematomas and postpartum hemorrhage. Severe perineal tears corresponded to third and fourth degree lacerations. Fetal morbidity outcomes comprised neonatal Apgar scores, acidemia, fetal injuries, birth trauma and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. RESULTS: Among 9762 women, 910 (9.3%) presented with persistent OP position at full cervical dilatation and 222 deliveries were enrolled. Of 111 attempted IR, 97 were successful (87.4%). The incidence of anal sphincter injuries was significantly reduced after IR attempt (1.8% vs. 12.6%; p < 0.002). Both groups were similar regarding most fetal outcomes and no birth trauma occurred in our study population. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, OP operative delivery was a significant risk factor of severe perineal lacerations (OR = 9.5; 95% CI: 2.05-44.05). CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of IR in order to reduce perineal morbidity associated with OP assisted delivery, in the setting of a failed manual rotation.

Versión cefálica externa (actualizado marzo de 2014) / External cephalic version (updated March 2014)

No disponible

Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with alternative instruments used to perform a mid-cavity rotational delivery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two university teaching hospitals in Scotland and England. POPULATION: Three hundred and eighty-one nulliparous women who had a mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery. METHODS: A data collection sheet was completed by the research team following delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postpartum haemorrhage, third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, low cord pH, neonatal trauma, and failed or sequential operative vaginal delivery. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three women (42.8%) underwent manual rotation followed by non-rotational forceps delivery, 73 (19.1%) had a rotational vacuum delivery, and 145 (38.1%) delivered with the assistance of rotational (Kielland) forceps. The rates of postpartum haemorrhage were similar when comparing manual rotation with rotational vacuum (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.66-3.98), and when comparing manual rotation with Kielland forceps (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.71-2.88). The results were comparable for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.13-1.89; adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.39-1.82), low cord pH (adjusted OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.44-6.91; adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.44-2.83), neonatal trauma (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.16-1.55; adjusted OR 3.25, 95% CI 0.65-16.17), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.45-4.81; adjusted OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.49-2.19). The sequential use of instruments was less likely with manual rotation and forceps than with rotational vacuum delivery (0.6 versus 36.9%, OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.002-0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and perinatal outcomes are comparable with Kielland forceps, vacuum extraction, and manual rotation, with few serious adverse outcomes. With appropriate training mid-cavity rotational delivery can be practiced safely, including the use of Kielland forceps.

Recuperación del parto vaginal de nalgas y versión cefálica externa / Reintroduction of vaginal breech delivery and external cephalic version

Objetivo. Se analizan retrospectivamente los resultados obstétricos y neonatales de la aplicación de un protocolo de parto vaginal de nalgas tras 10 años de su abandono. Métodos. Las pacientes eran derivadas a una unidad específica en la semana 36 donde se les ofrecía una versión cefálica externa. Si la presentación de nalgas persistía, eran seleccionadas para intento de parto vaginal si cumplían los siguientes criterios: a) peso fetal estimado 2.500-3.600g; b) nalgas puras o completas; c) cabeza fetal no hiperextendida, y d) pelvis clínicamente adecuada. El progreso del parto requería: a) primer estadio ≥1cm/h; b) segundo estadio 90 min para el descenso pasivo de las nalgas y una hora de pujos activos, y c) se estableció la disponibilidad de experto localizado. Resultados. Se encontró a 93 pacientes con presentación de nalgas única y viva tras la aplicación de la versión cefálica externa. En 69 (73,4%) se indicó una cesárea electiva, y 24 (26,6%) fueron candidatas para parto vaginal, 19 de las cuales lo lograron (20,1%). La tasa de cesáreas por esta indicación se redujo significativamente del 5,7% en 2009 a 2,02% (p<0,001). No se observó ningún resultado fetal adverso (muerte fetal, test de Apgar<7 en 5 min, pH de la arteria umbilical < 7 o traumatismos fetales). Conclusiones. El cumplimiento de los criterios anteparto e intraparto y la disponibilidad de expertos localizados hacen posible un parto vaginal seguro. La aplicación combinada de versión e intento de parto vaginal reduce la tasa de cesáreas por presentación de nalgas(AU)

Objective: To review the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of the application of an updated vaginal breech delivery protocol 10 years after this practice had been discontinued. Methods: Breech presentations were referred to a dedicated breech unit at 36 weeks where the external cephalic version was offered. If breech presentation persisted, the patients were selected to undergo attempted vaginal delivery if the following criteria were met: a) estimated fetal weight of 2.500-3.600 g; b) frank or complete breech presentation; c) absence of hyperextension of the fetal head; and d) a clinically adequate pelvis. Intrapartum criteria included: a) progression of labor of 1 cm/hour in the first hour; b) In the second stage, 90 minutes were allowed for adequate descent of the breech, and 1 hour of active pushing, and c) the availability of an on-call expert. Results: A total of 93 patients showed single live pregnancies in breech presentation after external cephalic version. Sixty-nine patients (73.4%) underwent elective prelabor cesarean delivery, and 24 (26.6%) progressed to attempted vaginal breech delivery, which was successful in 19 (20.1%). Cesarean indications for breech presentation were reduced from 5.7% in 2009 to 2.02% after the application of external cephalic version and vaginal breech delivery (P<.001). We observed no fetal deaths, no Apgar test at 5 minutes of less than 7, no umbilical artery pH of less than 7, and no fetal injuries. Conclusions: . When antepartum and intrapartum criteria are met, vaginal breech delivery is safe. The availability of an on-call expert allows vaginal breech delivery to be safely performed. The combination of external cephalic version and vaginal breech delivery decreases the cesarean rate for breech presentation(AU)

The force applied to successfully turn a foetus during reattempts of external cephalic version is substantially reduced when performed under spinal analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the forces exerted during external cephalic version (ECV) on the maternal abdomen between ( 1 ) the primary attempts performed without spinal analgesia (SA), which failed and ( 2 ) the subsequent reattempts performed under SA. METHODS: Patients with an uncomplicated singleton breech-presenting pregnancy suitable for ECV were recruited. During ECV, the operator wore a pair of gloves, which had thin piezo-resistive pressure sensors measuring the contact pressure between the operator's hands and maternal abdomen. For patients who had failed ECV, reattempts by the same operator was made with patients under SA, and the applied force was measured in the same manner. The profile of the exerted forces over time during each attempt was analyzed and denoted by pressure-time integral (PTI: mmHg sec). Pain score was also graded by patients using visual analogue scale. Both PTI and pain score before and after the use of SA were then compared. RESULTS: Overall, eight patients who had a failed ECV without SA underwent a reattempt with SA. All of them had successful version and the median PTI of the successful attempts under SA were lower than that of the previous failed attempts performed without SA (127 386 mmHg sec vs. 298,424 mmHg sec; p = 0.017). All of them also reported a 0 pain score, which was significantly lower than that of before (median 7.5; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: SA improves the success rate of ECV as well as reduces the force required for successful version.

Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.

BACKGROUND: The use of Kjelland's forceps is now uncommon, and published maternal and neonatal outcome data are from deliveries conducted more than a decade ago. The role of Kjelland's rotational delivery in the 'modern era' of high caesarean section rates is unclear. AIMS: To compare the results of attempted Kjelland's forceps rotational delivery with other methods of instrumental delivery in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: Retrospective review of all instrumental deliveries for singleton pregnancies 34 or more weeks gestation in a four-year birth cohort, with reference to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The outcomes of 1067 attempted instrumental deliveries were analysed. Kjelland's forceps were successful in 95% of attempts. Kjelland's forceps deliveries had a rate of adverse maternal outcomes indistinguishable from non-rotational ventouse, and lower than all other forms of instrumental delivery. Kjelland's forceps also had a lower rate of adverse neonatal outcomes than all other forms of instrumental delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Prudent use of Kjelland's forceps by experienced operators is associated with a very low rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Training in this important obstetric skill should be reconsidered urgently, before it is lost forever.

An anonymous survey of registrar training in the use of Kjelland's forceps in Australia.

Large series suggest that, when used with appropriate care and skill, rotational deliveries with Kjelland's forceps are a safe and useful procedure. We surveyed obstetric trainees in Australia to assess their experience with, and intentions to use, Kjelland's forceps. The response rate was 65%, and it was uncommon for even senior trainees to have performed more than ten Kjelland's forceps rotations during their training. Ninety-four per cent of final-year trainees stated they did not intend to use Kjelland's forceps in their consultant practice.

[External cephalic version in cases of breech presentation: renaissance of a well-known procedure?]. / Die äussere Wendung bei Beckenendlage: Renaissance eines altbekannten Verfahrens?

OBJECTIVE: About 3-4% of all pregnant women will have a fetus presenting by the breech at term. External cephalic version offers the opportunity to reduce the rate of caesarean sections caused by breech presentation. We analysed retrospectively 51 cases of external cephalic version at our clinic. METHODS: External cephalic version was performed 51 times between 37 and 41 weeks of pregnancy. RESULTS: External cephalic version was successful in 32/51 cases (62,7%) with a consecutive rate of vaginal delivery of 71,9%. The best results were seen at 37 weeks of pregnancy with 81,25% of successful versions followed by 76,9% of vaginal deliveries. Complications were rare. There was just 1 case of emergency caesarean section due to persisting fetal bradycardia. CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is an effective and safe treatment to enable vaginal delivery of cephalic presentation. For this operation, 37 weeks of pregnancy can be considered the best time.

[Can we still perform instrumental rotations using Thierry's spatula? Preliminary study among primiparous]. / Peut-on encore réaliser des rotations instrumentales par spatules de Thierry? Etude préliminaire chez la primipare.

OBJECTIVES: To study immediate perineal and neonatal outcomes after instrumental rotational performed with Thierry's spatula among primiparous, and compare subsequent perineal tear with occiput posterior position delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed from December 2005 to June 2006 at Paule-de-Viguier hospital (Toulouse university hospital) including all persistent occiput posterior vaginal deliveries among primiparous (49 patients). Mode of delivery was: 1) seven patients with spontaneous occiput anterior vaginal delivery (14.3%); 2) seven patients with rotational extraction using spatula with occiput anterior delivery (30.6%); 3) twenty-seven patients with instrumental extraction and occiput posterior delivery (55.1%). Maternal and fetal parameters were studied prospectively. RESULTS: Spatula was performed for failure of progress in 71.4% of cases (n=30) and for no reassuring fetal status in 28.6% of cases (n=12). In "rotational group", only one perineal tear was observed (Third degree) (6.6%) versus seven in "occiput posterior extraction group" (26%) with three severe perineal lacerations. Neonatal superficial lesions are frequent (26,6% after rotation versus 11.6% after occiput posterior extraction). None severe traumatic tears were observed. CONCLUSION: Instrumental rotation using Thierry's spatula seems to be less deleterious for maternal perineum than occiput posterior extraction, without increasing neonatal complications. Theses preliminary results have to be confirmed by more important prospective works.

Upper cervical spinal cord injury in neonates: the use of magnetic resonance imaging.

Neonatal upper cervical spinal cord injury is associated with rotational forceps delivery and presents with quadriparesis and diaphragmatic paralysis. The underlying pathology determines neurologic outcome but is difficult to assess clinically or with simple radiographic techniques. We report 4 cases in which early magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the extent and severity of the injury and guided management.