Optimizing therapy for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in children.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Uncertainties exist regarding the optimal treatment for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bloodstream infections, particularly in settings in which ampicillin cannot be used. RECENT FINDINGS: Quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin, all approved between 1999 and 2003, represent the mainstays of therapy for VRE bacteremia, although only linezolid has been specifically approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for this indication. The main objective of this review is to compare the relative efficacies, dosing strategies, and side-effect profiles of quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin for VRE bacteremia in the pediatric population. A brief description of recently approved broad-spectrum Gram-positive agents that may have a role in the management of VRE bacteremia in upcoming years is also provided. SUMMARY: Linezolid, despite its bacteriostatic activity against VRE, may be the most versatile of the available drugs. It has activity against both Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium, can be administered orally, and resistance appears to be less of a concern with linezolid compared with the other agents. Additionally, the results of two recent meta-analyses demonstrate more favorable outcomes with linezolid compared with daptomycin for the treatment of VRE bacteremia. The clinical pharmacokinetics of linezolid have been well described in children. The most notable concern with linezolid, however, is toxicities associated with prolonged use. Until more prospective data are available, we favor linezolid as first-line therapy for the treatment of VRE bacteremia in children.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of quinupristin/dalfopristin.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a streptogramin antibacterial with a wide spectrum of Gram-positive antibacterial activity. The drug has minimal oral absorption and is administered intravenously as a fixed 30 : 70 ratio of quinupristin to dalfopristin. A linear relationship has been observed between the dose administered and maximum plasma concentrations. Single-dose administration of 7.5 mg/kg produced a maximal plasma concentration of 2.3-2.7 mg/L for quinupristin and 6.1-8.2 mg/L for dalfopristin. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) obtained with the same dose was 2.7-3.3 and 6.5-7.7 mg. h/L for quinupristin and dalfopristin, respectively. Repeated administration results in 13-21% increases in maximum plasma concentrations and 21-26% increases in AUC for both quinupristin and dalfopristin. Quinupristin and dalfopristin exhibit steady-state volumes of distribution of 0.46-0.54 and 0.24-0.30 L/kg, respectively. Quinupristin exhibits higher protein binding (55-78%) than dalfopristin (11-26%), though both entities distribute well into tissues. Concentrations exceeding those in blood have been reported for the kidney, liver, spleen, salivary glands and white blood cells of primates. Extravascular penetration, as measured in blister fluid, is 40-80%. Both quinupristin and dalfopristin are extensively metabolised via nonenzymatic reactions. Quinupristin is conjugated to form two active compounds, a cysteine moiety and a glutathione moiety. Dalfopristin is hydrolysed to the active metabolite pristinamycin IIA. The metabolites exert antibacterial activity similar to that of the parent compounds. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is excreted primarily in the faeces (75-77%), with lesser renal excretion (15-19%). The elimination half-lives of quinupristin and dalfopristin are similar, and are 0.7-1.3 hours after single doses. The metabolites have slightly longer half-lives, ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 hours. With repeated doses, plasma clearance of quinupristin and dalfopristin is reduced by approximately 20% compared with single doses, resulting in clearances of 0.7-0.8 L/h/kg. Saturable protein binding has been hypothesised as a causative mechanism. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, resulting in multiple drug interactions. Ciclosporin AUC increased by 5-222% when coadministered with quinupristin/dalfopristin. Careful monitoring of patients receiving drugs that are substrates of cytochrome P450 3A4 is suggested.Quinupristin/dalfopristin is administered at 7.5 mg/kg every 8-12 hours, depending upon the severity of infection. The pharmacodynamic parameter linked with antibacterial activity for quinupristin/dalfopristin appears to be the ratio of AUC to the minimal inhibitory concentration. The additional activity of a prolonged post-antibiotic effect may also be important for efficacy.

Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin: novel antibiotics for gram-positive infections of the skin.

With the continuing development of clinical drug resistance among bacteria, the need for new, effective agents to treat multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive infections remains important. With treatment options limited, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives. This review focuses on agents newly introduced and FDA-approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections: linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin.

Treatment of life-threatening multiresistant staphylococcal and enterococcal infections in patients with end-stage renal failure with quinupristin/dalfopristin: preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: Life-threatening infections with multiresistant gram-positive bacteria are increasing. Treatment with quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q-D) has turned out to be effective against such resistant pathogens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report on treatment of six patients on dialysis (four with additional liver injury) and of one renal graft recipient with normal renal function who had severe infections caused by multiresistant Staphylococus epidermidis (1/7), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (4/7) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (2/7). RESULTS: Six out of seven patients were cured by therapy with Q-D in adjusted doses lasting for 10 to 34 days. Pharmacokinetics of Q-D and its metabolites were determined and remained within the therapeutic range, despite a modest increase of all compounds at the presumed steady state. The concentrations of the metabolites of Q-D were clearly lower than the parent drugs, including those of quinupristin-conjugated derivatives, which has not been reported previously. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that: a) neither quinupristin nor dalfopristin or its metabolites accumulated despite the long duration of treatment; b) no adjustment of the standard dosage regimen (three times 7.5 mg/kg/day) is necessary in end-stage renal disease.

[Novel compounds active on staphylococci]. / Les nouveaux antistaphylococciques.

Research efforts to discover new compounds active against staphylococci are more than ever justified today. The incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci remains very high in hospitals, and the solution provided by glycopeptides is far from being satisfactory. These compounds exhibit mediocre pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Their ease and safety of use are poor. Finally, strains with diminished sensitivity to these antibiotics are beginning to appear. This article examines the opportunities offered by two new anti-staphylococcal agents: quinupristine-dalfopristine (Synercid) and linezolide (not marketed in France).

Clearance of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Synercid) and their main metabolites during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) with or without dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q/D) is often utilized in critically ill patients, some of whom require CVVH. This study was undertaken to determine the clearance of O/D and their main active metabolites (RPR 100391, RP 69012, RP 12536) via CVVH in the swine model. METHODS: Q/D 7.5 mg/kg was intravenously administered over 0.5 h to 12 swine after induction of acute renal failure by ligation of the renal arteries. At 0.5 h post injection, the CVVH procedure was initiated and continued for 8 hours at the following pump rates: (1)100 mL/min, (2)180 rnL/min, and (3)100 mL/min with dialysis (flow rate: 1 L/h). Blood and ultrafiltrate samples were collected at 1 h intervals and assessed by a validated HPLC method. RESULTS: Plasma analysis suggests rapid metabolism to the main active metabolites which are appreciably cleared as demonstrated by high clearance and sieving coefficient estimates. Mean clearance estimates for RP 69012, RP 100391, and RP 12536 are 729, 777, and 578 mL/h in the 100 mL/min CVVH group, 772, 785, 685 mL/min in the 180 mL/min CVVH group, and 753, 791, 616 mL/min in the 100 mL/min CVVH group with 1 L/h dialysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data reveal that Q/D is rapidly metabolized and the metabolites are cleared to a large extent via CVVH. Due to the considerable contribution of the metabolites to overall in vivo activities, additional studies are required to fully quantify their removal before final dosage modifications for patients undergoing CVVH can be recommended.

In vitro activity and post-antibiotic effect of quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid).

The in vitro activities of quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), ampicillin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline were examined and compared against 526 gram-positive bacteria. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for quinupristin/dalfopristin against Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains, were low (MIC(90) = 0.5 mg/l), and were comparable with those of vancomycin and teicoplanin. This compound was superior to the macrolides and highly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (both penicillin-sensitive and penicillin-resistant strains), with MIC(90) = 2 mg/l. It was also active against other streptococci, with MIC(90) = 4 mg/l. However, this agent is less active against enterococci (MIC(90) = 32 mg/l). Quinupristin/dalfopristin showed high activity against gram-positive anaerobes, including Clostridium spp., Peptococcus spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp., with MIC(90) < or = 2 mg/l. Quinupristin/dalfopristin was also investigated for its post-antibiotic effect (PAE) and bactericidal kinetics against nine strains of gram-positive organisms, including staphylococci, enterococci and pneumococci. Exponentially growing (log phase) cultures were exposed to quinupristin/dalfopristin at 2 x MIC. Growth kinetics was evaluated using viable counting. The drug was uniformly bactericidal against pneumococci and staphylococci within 2 and 8 h of exposure, respectively. The killing activity against enterococci was weak; there was little or no reduction in bacterial count over 24 h of incubation. PAEs ranging from 2.13 to 3.28 h, 0.92 to 3.02 h and 1.89 to 7.07 h were produced on the tested pneumococci, staphylococci and enterococci, respectively. This study showed that quinupristin/dalfopristin is a promising agent active against gram-positive bacteria. The prolonged PAEs also suggest that the drug could be used intermittently at more widely spaced dosing intervals against gram-positive organisms.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of two regimens of quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) in healthy volunteers.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D) is a novel streptogramin antibiotic for the treatment of severe gram-positive infections. The purpose of this open, nonrandomized, parallel-group, phase I trial was to evaluate Q/D pharmacokinetics after single and repeated doses under the two different dosing regimens corresponding to the effective doses and to evaluate tolerability. Two groups of 10 healthy volunteers received multiple 1-hour intravenous infusions of 7.5 mg/kg Q/D either every 8 or 12 hours for 4 or 5 days, respectively. Plasma concentrations of Q, D, and metabolites were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and selective microbiological assays. The two regimens q8h and q12h lead to the same disposition profile after single and repeated administration. Single-dose data confirmed the high plasma clearances of Q and D (about 0.90 l/h/kg) obtained previously. Unchanged drugs were the main components in plasma, with each of the three metabolites representing about 20% (in terms of the AUC ratio) of the parent drugs. Comparable steady-state concentrations were reached from day 2 of both regimens. A similar moderate increase in Cmax and AUC (about 20%) of parent drugs was observed between the first and last day of treatment. This phenomenon, which was also observed for the metabolites, was not expected considering the short terminal disposition half-lives of the parent drugs and trough plasma concentrations of all components mostly below the limits of quantitation at steady state, whatever the dosing regimen. The clearances of parent drugs at steady state were about 20% lower as compared with that observed following the first drug administration (statistically significant difference). No trend suggesting a treatment effect on any laboratory parameter, vital signs, or electrocardiographic parameters was identified. However, 80% of subjects reported venous adverse events probably related to treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of quinupristin/ dalfopristin in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic profile of a single intravenous injection of quinupristin/dalfopristin, a new injectable streptogramin, in healthy young individuals and patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency. A secondary objective was to assess the relative tolerability of this dose in these patients compared with healthy individuals. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 13 patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance 6 to 28 ml/min/1.73m2) were individually matched for gender, bodyweight and age to a healthy volunteer. METHODS: Participants received a single dose of quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight as a continuous 1-hour intravenous infusion, followed by serial blood sampling. RESULTS: The disposition profile of unchanged quinupristin was similar in the 2 groups. However, the elimination of quinupristin derivatives in patients with renal impairment tended to be decreased: mean peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinfinity) of quinupristin plus its active derivatives were about 1.4 times higher in the patients with renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers. The mean Cmax and AUCinfinity of both unchanged dalfopristin and dalfopristin plus its active derivatives were about 1.3 times higher in renally impaired patients than in healthy volunteers. Adverse events were generally mild and transient. No severe or serious adverse events were reported and no participants prematurely discontinued the study. Venous tolerability tended to be better in healthy volunteers than in the patients with renal impairment. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that no formal reduction in the dosage of quinupristin/dalfopristin is necessary in patients with severe chronic renal impairment.

Antibiotics for gram-positive bacterial infections. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and linezolid.

Vancomycin is a safe, effective antibiotic for a variety of serious gram-positive infections. Because of emerging resistance in enterococci and staphylococci and the emerging threat of spread of vancomycin-resistant genes to other gram-positive organisms, judicious use of vancomycin should be promoted. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, a streptogramin antibiotic, and linezolid, an oxazolidinone, show promise against some strains of gram-positive bacteria that are resistant to vancomycin.

[Comparative diffusion of fusidic acid, oxacillin, and pristinamycin in dermal interstitial fluid after repeated oral administration]. / Diffusions comparées de l'acide fusidique, de l'oxacilline et de la pristinamycine dans le liquide interstitiel dermique après administration orale répétée.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use the suction bullae technique to compare skin diffusion of 3 antibiotics commonly used for skin infections (fusidic acid, oxacillin, pristinamycin) and to estimate their potential activity at the site of skin infections. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This comparative open study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers using a repeated latin square experimental scheme. Antibiotic concentrations in serum and suction bullae fluid were measured by high performance liquid chromatography after 5.5 days of repeated oral administration of fusidic acid (1 g/d), oxacillin (2 g/d), and pristinamycin (2 g/d). RESULTS: Mean antibiotic concentrations in serum and interstitial fluid (suction bullae fluid) were highest for fusidic acid with a Cmax at 91.3 +/- 23.0 mg/l and 45.5 +/- 18.0 mg/l respectively (interstitial fluid/serum ratio=49 +/- 10 p. 100). For oxacillin, Cmax was 8.3 +/- 3.6 mg/l and 0.98 +/- 0.49 mg/l (ratio 13 +/- 5 p. 100). Pristinamycin concentrations were low with a Cmax at 0.51 +/- 0.40 and 0.26 +/- 0.15 mg/l (ratio 73 +/- 57 p. 100). Comparing the area under the interstitial fluid and the serum concentration-time curves showed that the best diffusion was obtained with pristinamycin (114 +/- 61 p. 100), followed by fusidic acid (57 +/- 13 p. 100) and oxacillin (48 +/- 25 p. 100). DISCUSSION: These data were used to calculate indicators of potential efficacy in the interstitial dermal fluid: inhibitor quotient (Cmax/MIC) and AUIC (ASC/MIC), indicator of the time antibiotic concentrations are maintained above the minimal inhibitor concentration (MIC). This showed that fusidic acid was potentially more active against all staphylococci. For streptococci, the observed interstitial concentrations of pristinamycin and of fusidic acid should theoretically inhibit streptococci A growth, but oxacillin was the most adapted antibiotic.

The new antibiotics.

It is easy to become overwhelmed by the amount of information available on the new antibiotics and difficult to keep abreast of the appropriate indications for each of them. For most patients with community-acquired infections, the first-line agent is usually not one of the newer agents, but a standard regimen, or at times, no antibiotic at all. The development of resistance is likely to parallel the extent to which these agents are prescribed. They should be used only when standard treatment fails, when compliance with treatment is a real and serious issue, or when the patient has a real allergic reaction to the standard regimen.

Use of anti-infective agents during lactation: Part 1--Beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and linezolid.

Because many antibiotics are excreted into the breast milk, it can be difficult for a practitioner to choose an antibiotic for a lactating patient that will have minimal risks to her nursing infant. This article is the first of a three-part series discussing the use of anti-infective agents during lactation. The authors review general information regarding use and common side effects of several classes of antibiotics. They also summarize information, including documented milk concentrations, milk-to-plasma ratios, and other pharmacokinetic properties, in a table that can help practitioners choose antibiotics that may be considered safe for the lactating mother.

Pharmacokinetics of quinupristin-dalfopristin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin may be useful for treatment of organisms causing peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, including methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The pharmacokinetic profiles of single intravenous doses of this combination streptogramin antibiotic of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight were characterized for eight noninfected patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Comparison was made to pharmacokinetic profiles determined for eight healthy volunteers matched by age, sex, and race. Drug was measured in dialysate up to 6 h following the dose. Plasma and dialysate were assayed for parent compounds and metabolites. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for maximal concentrations in plasma, times to maximal concentration, areas under the curve, distribution volumes, rates of total body clearance, or half-lives in plasma for quinupristin and dalfopristin. No statistically significant differences were observed in maximal concentrations in plasma, times to maximal concentration, areas under the curve, or half-lives for cysteine, the glutathione conjugates of quinupristin, or the pristinamycin IIA metabolite of dalfopristin. The measurements in dialysate of the parent and most metabolites were below the expected MICs. Dialysis clearance was insignificant. Quinupristin-dalfopristin was well tolerated in both groups, causing only mild adverse events that resolved prior to discharge from the study. The disposition of quinupristin, dalfopristin, or their primary metabolites following a single dose was unaltered in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Intravenous dosing of this antibiotic combination is unlikely to be adequate for the treatment of peritonitis associated with peritoneal dialysis.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections.

UNLABELLED: Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the first parenteral streptogramin antibacterial agent, and is a 30:70 (w/w) ratio of 2 semisynthetic pristinamycin derivatives. The combination has inhibitory activity against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, other streptococci, Clostridium perfringens and Peptostreptococcus spp. The combination also has good activity against selected gram-negative respiratory tract pathogens including Moraxella catarrhalis, Legioniella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Quinupristin/dalfopristin has poor activity against E. faecalis. The combination is bactericidal against staphylococci and streptococci, although constitutive erythromycin resistance can affect its activity. As for many other agents, quinupristin/dalfopristin is generally bacteriostatic against E. faecium. In patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or VREF infections participating in prospective emergency-use trials, quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 or 12 hours achieved clinical or bacteriological success in > or =64% of patients. Emergence of resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was uncommon (4% of patients) in those with VREF infections. Quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg 8- or 12-hourly also achieved similar clinical success rates to comparator agents in patients with presumed gram-positive complicated skin and skin structure infections or nosocomial pneumonia (administered in combination with aztreoman) in 3 large multicentre randomised trials. Systemic adverse events associated with quinupristin/dalfopristin include gastrointestinal events (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea), rash and pruritus. Myalgias and arthralgias also occur at an overall incidence of 1.3%, although higher rates (2.5 to 31%) have been reported in patients with multiple comorbidities. Venous events are common if the drug is administered via a peripheral line; however, several management options (e.g. use of central venous access, increased infusion volume) may help to minimise their occurrence. Hyperbilirubinaemia has been documented in 3.1% of quinupristin/dalfopristin recipients versus 1.3% of recipients of comparator agents. Quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibits cytochrome P450 3A4 and therefore has the potential to increase the plasma concentrations of substrates of this enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: Quinupristin/dalfopristin, the first parenteral streptogramin, offers a unique spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. In serious gram-positive infections for which there are other treatment options available, the spectrum of activity and efficacy of quinupristin/ dalfopristin should be weighed against its tolerability and drug interaction profile. However, in VREF or unresponsive MRSA infections, where few proven treatment options exist, quinupristin/dalfopristin should be considered as a treatment of choice for these seriously ill patients.

Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium with RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) administered by intermittent or continuous infusion, alone or in combination with doxycycline, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin is a streptogramin antibiotic combination with activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), but emergence of resistance has been recently reported. We studied the activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin against two clinical strains of VREF (12311 and 12366) in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs) to determine the potential for resistance selection and possible strategies for prevention. Baseline MICs/minimal bactericidal concentrations (microg/ml) for quinupristin-dalfopristin, quinupristin, dalfopristin, and doxycycline were 0.25/2, 64/>512, 4/512, and 0.125/8 for VREF 12311 and 0.25/32, 128/>512, 2/128, and 0.25/16 for VREF 12366, respectively. Quinupristin-dalfopristin regimens had significantly less activity against VREF 12366 than VREF 12311. An 8-microg/ml simulated continuous infusion was the only bactericidal regimen with time to 99.9% killing = 90 hours. The combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin every 8 h with doxycycline resulted in more killing compared to either drug alone. Quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant mutants (MICs, 4 microg/ml; resistance proportion, approximately 4 x 10(-4)) emerged during the quinupristin-dalfopristin monotherapies for both VREF strains. Resistance was unstable in VREF 12311 and stable in VREF 12366. The 8-microg/ml continuous infusion or addition of doxycycline to quinupristin-dalfopristin prevented the emergence of resistance for both strains over the 96-h test period. These findings replicated the development of resistance reported in humans and emphasized bacterial factors (drug susceptibility, high inoculum, organism growth phase) and infectious conditions (penetration barriers) which could increase chances for clinical resistance. The combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin with doxycycline and the administration of quinupristin-dalfopristin as a high-dose continuous infusion warrant further study to determine their potential clinical utility.