[Etiology and clinical treatment strategies for second primary molars without permanent tooth germs].

Congenital tooth agenesis is a type of craniofacial developmental anomaly with reduced number of teeth, which is caused by disturbances in tooth germ development. If the number of missing teeth is less than six (excluding the third molars), it is termed as hypodontia. The second premolars are most commonly affected. When the second premolars are missing, the second primary molars are more prone to suffer from retention, infraocclusion, caries, pulpitis, or periapical periodontitis. Without timely prevention and appropriate treatment, congenital loss of second premolars may cause adverse effects on the patients' tooth arrangement, occlusal function, craniofacial development, and even future prosthetic treatment. This review summarises the aetiological and diagnostic features of the agenesis of second premolars, and discusses the clinical considerations of retaining or extracting the second primary molars without permanent tooth germs, when the absence of permanent tooth germs is fully established or not, so as to provide references for dentists.

A Case Against the Implant.

It is incumbent upon our profession to reevaluate our preference for routinely replacing a missing single maxillary incisor, especially a maxillary lateral incisor, with a dental implant in a young adult. The dental literature is replete with beautiful restorative results using implants in this area, but there is minimal discussion regarding the long-term consequences of this treatment. The maxillary lateral incisor is one of the most commonly missing teeth due to agenesis, and it is also one of the most common teeth to be lost due to trauma in the developing child.1 Therefore, the decision for replacement must be made with the long-term in mind, as these restorations are commonly placed between ages 18 and 21 and must serve the patient for many decades. There are several reasons that implants can be associated with complications or even fail, including the following: (1) Continued craniofacial growth, which has a predominant anterior and vertical component and has been shown to occur in the maxilla, resulting in the apparent submersion of the implant crown as the natural teeth move incisally in relation to the implant2,3-there is no evidence that this can be predicted, let alone how far into the future it may happen; (2) peri-implantitis, which has a patient-level prevalence estimate of nearly 25% according to the findings of a recent systematic review;4 (3) thinning and recession of the peri-implant mucosa due to poor implant placement, inadequate prosthetic management, and/or poor case selection, often resulting in compromised esthetics and a predisposition for the onset and progression of peri-implant diseases; and (4) mechanical failure of the implant, abutment screw, transmucosal abutment, and/or crown. Clinicians should also keep in mind that, once an implant is placed in the anterior maxilla, it precludes the possibility for palatal expansion in the adult patient because the space created by the expansion cannot be redistributed orthodontically. Canine substitution is one traditional method for replacement of the missing maxillary lateral incisor. It is still a viable option when the canine tooth has an acceptable shape and color, and the occlusion will not be compromised by the substitution.5 Additionally, the bonded single-wing zirconia bridge has become a primary treatment option.6 Zirconia has the strength of metal and beauty of porcelain, which makes it an ideal substrate for a bonded bridge. The literature has demonstrated the long-term success of this replacement option for the missing maxillary incisor.7 There are clearly many potential long-term disadvantages associated with replacing a single missing maxillary incisor with an implant in young adults. We should be prescribing the least-invasive treatment option for the replacement of these teeth. Therefore, when treatment-planning for a missing maxillary incisor in a young adult, alternatives to implant therapy-such as the bonded single-wing zirconia bridge and canine substitution-should be the primary treatment options. The implant should only be considered as a secondary treatment when the other options are not viable or have previously failed.

Evaluation of the aesthetics and clinical findings in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors treated with a 10-year interval.

INTRODUCTION: The most common treatment approaches for patients missing maxillary lateral incisors are implant replacement (IT) and orthodontic space closure (SC). Treatment techniques change and improve over time, and it is of interest to know if improvements differ between the methods. AIM: To compare the aesthetic outcome and other clinical findings in patients with one or two missing maxillary lateral incisors who were treated with a 10-year difference in time, with either orthodontic space closure or implant replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 88 patients were included in the study. Forty-four patients treated between 2011 and 2018 were included as the latter cohort (LC). The LC was compared to the early cohort (EC; n = 44), treated between 2001 and 2008. A total of 132 teeth was analysed: 62 teeth in the EC (28 teeth in IT cases and 34 teeth in SC cases) and 70 teeth in the LC (34 teeth in IT cases and 36 teeth in SC cases). Long-term clinical and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: An improvement over time was found in crown length, BoP, papilla, the inclination of incisors, and overall appearance in IT cases and in crown colour and overbite in SC cases. A deterioration over time was found in crown length and BoP among the SC cases. CONCLUSION: Among the IT cases, an improvement in outcomes was noted over time. When comparing SC cases the colour of the crown and overbite had improved, while crown length and BoP had deteriorated over time.

A 10-year-old boy with class II oligodontia treated with buccal fixed appliances and agenesis space closure of the four second premolars: Case report No. 230075 - Titularisation Collège Européen Orthodontie (CEO), European College of Orthodontics.

The patient presented in this case report is a 10-year-old boy with hyperdivergent skeletal Class II associated with familial genetic agenesis of the second premolars. The treatment plan chosen was to close the spaces of agenesis using a bimaxillary appliance fixed buccally. The advantages and disadvantages of this treatment option were discussed. The result was stable and made it possible to avoid an implant-prosthetic solution, which would undoubtedly have been more restrictive over time.

Agenesis of the maxillary permanent lateral incisors with the deciduous retained: Conservative and biomimetic approach using the BAIR technique.

OBJECTIVE: Agenesis of the maxillary permanent lateral incisors is a condition that requires treatment aimed at improving the esthetics, even at an early age. However, traditional therapeutic protocols are long, invasive and have limitations and contraindications imposed by the age of the patient. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Recent developments in restorative dentistry have provided a new approach to this clinical situation, in particular when the deciduous laterals are retained. We report two cases regarding the management of missing lateral incisors using Biologically Active Intrasulcular Restoration (BAIR) technique. The BAIR technique allows us to transform the shape of the deciduous lateral incisor into the permanent, acting both on the dental morphology and proportions, and on the appearance of the soft tissues and the gingival parables. CONCLUSIONS: The BAIR technique is a valid approach to cases of agenesis of the maxillary permanent lateral incisors, when the deciduous are retained. It does not require any preparation of the dental tissues, is reversible and minimally invasive. It is applicable to patients of all ages, and results are obtained in a single appointment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The BAIR technique allows a biomimetic conservative approach for the rehabilitation of congenitally missing permanent lateral incisors, when the deciduous are retained. It is a non-invasive protocol and effective in successfully restoring esthetics.

Retratamiento multidisciplinar de una agenesia de un incisivo lateral superior con un implante cerámico monobloque. A propósito de un caso clínico / Multidisciplinary re-treatment of an agenesis of an upper lateral incisor with an one-piece ceramic implant. A clinical report

Introducción: Los implantes dentales de circona son una buena opción terapéutica que surge como alternativa a los implantes dentales convencionales de titanio, dadas sus excelentes propiedades de biocompatibilidad, baja acumulación de placa bacteriana y escaso infiltrado inflamatorio. El objetivo del presente caso clínico es describir la colocación de un implante monobloque de circona para reponer un incisivo lateral superior izquierdo en un paciente de 34 años de edad, para la posterior realización de una corona implantosoportada monolítica de circona. Descripción del caso: Se presenta un paciente varón de 34 años de edad, no fumador y sin antecedentes médico-quirúrgicos de interés (ASA I), que acudió a la consulta demandando una mejora en la estética de su sonrisa. El paciente presentaba una agenesia congénita en el incisivo lateral superior izquierdo que había sido tratada previamente con ortodoncia para cerrar dicho espacio. Tras el examen intraoral del paciente y el estudio radiográfico, se plantea la opción de tratamiento de abrir nuevamente el espacio mediante ortodoncia para rehabilitar la ausencia con un implante de circona, asegurando la estética que demandaba el paciente. Conclusiones: La rehabilitación mediante implantes de circona para el tratamiento de agenesias congénitas en incisivos laterales superiores, es una opción válida y efectiva, obteniendo resultados óptimos a nivel estético y funcional. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios clínicos con tamaños muestrales suficientes que comparen implantes de titanio y cerámicos con el fin de tener datos más concluyentes. (AU)

Introduction: Zirconia dental implants are a good therapeutic option emerging as an alternative to conventional titanium dental implants, given their excellent properties of biocompatibility, low bacterial plaque accumulation and low inflammatory infiltrate. The aim of the present clinical case is to describe the placement of a zirconia implant to replace an upper left lateral incisor in a 34-year-old patient, for the subsequent restoration of a monolithic implant-supported zirconia crown. Case description: A clinical case of a 34-year-old man is presented, nonsmoker and with no previous registered medical records (ASA I) who came to the dental clinic demanding an improvement in the aesthetics of his smile. The patient had a congenital agenesis of the left lateral incisor that had previously been treated with orthodontics to close the space. After the radiographic study and intraoral examination of the patient, the treatment option of reopening the space with a new phase of corrective orthodontics to rehabilitate the absence with a zirconia implant was proposed, ensuring the aesthetics demanded by the patient. Conclusions: Restoration using zirconia implants for the treatment of congenital agenesis in upper lateral incisors is a valid and effective option, obtaining optimal aesthetic and functional results. However, more clinical studies with sufficient sample sizes comparing titanium and ceramic implants are needed in order to have more conclusive data. (AU)

Retratamiento multidisciplinar de una agenesia de un incisivo lateral superior con un implante cerámico monobloque. A propósito de un caso clínico / Multidisciplinary re-treatment of an agenesis of an upper lateral incisor with an one-piece ceramic implant. A clinical report

Introducción: Los implantes dentales de circona son una buena opción terapéutica que surge como alternativa a los implantes dentales convencionales de titanio, dadas sus excelentes propiedades de biocompatibilidad, baja acumulación de placa bacteriana y escaso infiltrado inflamatorio. El objetivo del presente caso clínico es describir la colocación de un implante monobloque de circona para reponer un incisivo lateral superior izquierdo en un paciente de 34 años de edad, para la posterior realización de una corona implantosoportada monolítica de circona. Descripción del caso: Se presenta un paciente varón de 34 años de edad, no fumador y sin antecedentes médico-quirúrgicos de interés (ASA I), que acudió a la consulta demandando una mejora en la estética de su sonrisa. El paciente presentaba una agenesia congénita en el incisivo lateral superior izquierdo que había sido tratada previamente con ortodoncia para cerrar dicho espacio. Tras el examen intraoral del paciente y el estudio radiográfico, se plantea la opción de tratamiento de abrir nuevamente el espacio mediante ortodoncia para rehabilitar la ausencia con un implante de circona, asegurando la estética que demandaba el paciente. Conclusiones: La rehabilitación mediante implantes de circona para el tratamiento de agenesias congénitas en incisivos laterales superiores, es una opción válida y efectiva, obteniendo resultados óptimos a nivel estético y funcional. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios clínicos con tamaños muestrales suficientes que comparen implantes de titanio y cerámicos con el fin de tener datos más concluyentes. (AU)

Introduction: Zirconia dental implants are a good therapeutic option emerging as an alternative to conventional titanium dental implants, given their excellent properties of biocompatibility, low bacterial plaque accumulation and low inflammatory infiltrate. The aim of the present clinical case is to describe the placement of a zirconia implant to replace an upper left lateral incisor in a 34-year-old patient, for the subsequent restoration of a monolithic implant-supported zirconia crown. Case description: A clinical case of a 34-year-old man is presented, nonsmoker and with no previous registered medical records (ASA I) who came to the dental clinic demanding an improvement in the aesthetics of his smile. The patient had a congenital agenesis of the left lateral incisor that had previously been treated with orthodontics to close the space. After the radiographic study and intraoral examination of the patient, the treatment option of reopening the space with a new phase of corrective orthodontics to rehabilitate the absence with a zirconia implant was proposed, ensuring the aesthetics demanded by the patient. Conclusions: Restoration using zirconia implants for the treatment of congenital agenesis in upper lateral incisors is a valid and effective option, obtaining optimal aesthetic and functional results. However, more clinical studies with sufficient sample sizes comparing titanium and ceramic implants are needed in order to have more conclusive data. (AU)

Orthodontic input in the management of hypodontia cases.

This article aims to give an overview of the part orthodontics plays in the management of hypodontia cases. Severity of hypodontia varies and some cases can be managed by orthodontics alone. The more complex cases benefit from multidisciplinary care with a combination of orthodontics and restorative treatment. This article sub-divides orthodontic involvement in hypodontia cases into three distinct phases, while providing clinical examples to highlight the management of a variety of cases ranging from simple to complex.

Restorative dentistry clinical decision-making for hypodontia: peg and missing lateral incisor teeth.

Peg-shaped and missing lateral incisor teeth are common features for patients affected by hypodontia. While improvements in dental appearance may be a strong motivating factor for these patients, providing dental treatment to improve the clinical condition and achieve an acceptable and stable outcome can be complex and lengthy.For patients affected by hypodontia, discussion and consideration of various approaches to their individual treatment are best achieved in a multidisciplinary team environment. This allows debate of options and joint agreement between at least orthodontic and restorative dentistry specialist colleagues, based largely on clinical factors, towards a treatment plan that is acceptable to the patient. As most patients with this lateral incisor form of hypodontia are initially treated as teenagers and young adults, there is also an understanding that treatment outcomes will have lifelong maintenance and resource implications to consider.This paper identifies and discusses the key clinical features that influence the treatment planning process for a patient with either missing or peg lateral incisor teeth. These will often involve consideration of whether to open or close the lateral incisor spaces and whether to restore or replace a peg lateral incisor tooth. The process should be patient-centred, evidence-based, and aim to minimise the lifelong treatment burden, retaining options for future maintenance and retreatment.

Restorative dentistry clinical decision-making for hypodontia: retained primary molars.

Primary molar teeth that are retained beyond their exfoliation pose a clinical decision-making challenge for dental teams. The retention of these teeth may be due to absence of a permanent successor. As a result, careful planning is required to determine if retention or extraction is necessary. This article aims to discuss the prevalence of retained primary molars, assessment and treatment planning considerations, from both orthodontic and restorative perspectives.

Restorative dentistry clinical decision-making for hypodontia: managing missing premolar teeth.

Hypodontia is a relatively common clinical condition and the second premolar tooth is the most common tooth that fails to develop (excluding third molars). For some patients, no treatment is required, as there is little, if any, consequence of the condition. For other patients, the missing teeth are part of a more complex dental presentation, requiring specialist dental management. This paper describes the clinical decision-making process and explores the options for managing this presentation of hypodontia.

The dental technician as a member of the hypodontia multidisciplinary team, with practical considerations for anterior restoration design.

Most patients seeking treatment for hypodontia will require prosthetic replacement of their missing teeth. This will be in the form of dentures, bridges and implant restorations. As these are created by one or more dental technicians who supports the clinical team, a close working relationship between these colleagues is likely to improve the quality of treatment outcome. This interaction will usually occur towards the end of the patient's treatment process, when definitive restorations are prescribed. However, appropriately trained and experienced dental technicians should be involved throughout the patient's treatment process as an integral part of the multidisciplinary team approach to effectively manage these patients.This paper describes the contribution of dental technicians to patient care with particular focus on communication between the restorative dentistry clinical team and the dental technician to improve the quality of anterior restorations. As missing maxillary lateral incisor teeth are a common presentation for this patient group, further technical detail relating to planning resin-bonded bridges for replacement of these teeth is included.

Restorative dentistry clinical decision-making for hypodontia: complex cases.

Hypodontia is a relatively common condition and patients will be seen by both general dental practitioners and specialist dental colleagues. Although hypodontia can be described as mild, moderate and severe, this does not directly correlate with the complexity of treatment required to provide an acceptable outcome. In addition, the complexity of treatment provided by one colleague in the multidisciplinary team may not be the same as for other colleagues.When treatment planning and delivering dental care for these patients, especially those with severe hypodontia, it is useful to recognise the factors that make their care complex and also to follow principles for multidisciplinary treatment planning.

Practical advice for successful clinical treatment with resin-bonded bridges.

Resin-bonded bridges are one of the main options for replacing missing teeth for hypodontia patients. This technique offers several advantages for these patients, who are often young, have unrestored abutment teeth, and have had tooth positions optimised by orthodontic treatment. However, the replacement of missing teeth can be challenging due to tooth positions and anomalies of abutment tooth shape and size.These patients are often young adults at the time of restoration, making the minimally invasive nature and predictable long-term success of resin-bonded bridges advantageous over other treatment methods.This paper in the hypodontia themed issue discusses the importance of case selection and gives practical advice for the design and provision of resin-bonded bridges.

A service evaluation of the multidisciplinary team approach to hypodontia.

Introduction Patients with hypodontia can be seen by a multidisciplinary team clinic (MDT) for treatment planning at the University Dental Hospital of Manchester (UDHM). The MDT consists of orthodontics, restorative dentistry and oral surgery colleagues.Aims and methods A retrospective case-note analysis was conducted on 558 hypodontia patients seen on Manchester Hypodontia Clinic (MHC) between 2016-2022 to assess service utilisation and treatment planning outcomes.Results The average age of patients attending the MHC was 16 (range 8-50). The distribution of mild, moderate and severe hypodontia in the sample was 28%, 37% and 35%, respectively. Most common treatments proposed were fixed appliances, extractions, implants and resin-bonded bridges. Out of 558 patients seen for consultation on the MHC, 365 (65%) were accepted for treatment. The average number of visits for treatment was 15.5 (range: 1-55). The average number of did not attend/was not brought appointments, patient cancellations and hospital cancellations were 0.8, 1.4 and 1.8, respectively.Conclusion Hypodontia patients referred to UDHM are triaged by consultants in orthodontics or restorative dentistry, and if MDT planning is required, they are booked onto the MHC. There are sufficient patients with complex cases of moderate and severe hypodontia to justify a regular MDT hypodontia clinic.

The role of the general dental practitioner in the management of the hypodontia patient.

The general dental practitioner (GDP) is usually the first person to suspect that a young patient is affected by hypodontia. The condition occurs rarely in the primary dentition but is relatively common in the permanent dentition. Between the ages of 7 and 12 years, failure of a permanent tooth to erupt as expected will lead the GDP to initiate and then contribute to the ideal management of the patient's condition. This ranges from reassurance and preventive measures to providing aspects of treatment in a long-term management plan, alongside a multidisciplinary specialist team and thereafter, delivery of life-long dental care.