Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30.140
Filtrar
5.
10.
FASEB J ; 35(11): e21973, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34624149

RESUMO

Contemporary science has become increasingly multi-disciplinary and team-based, resulting in unprecedented growth in biomedical innovation and technology over the last several decades. Collaborative research efforts have enabled investigators to respond to the demands of an increasingly complex 21st century landscape, including pressing scientific challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. A major contributing factor to the success of team science is the mobilization of core facilities and shared research resources (SRRs), the scientific instrumentation and expertise that exist within research organizations that enable widespread access to advanced technologies for trainees, faculty, and staff. For over 40 years, SRRs have played a key role in accelerating biomedical research discoveries, yet a national strategy that addresses how to leverage these resources to enhance team science and achieve shared scientific goals is noticeably absent. We believe a national strategy for biomedical SRRs-led by the National Institutes of Health-is crucial to advance key national initiatives, enable long-term research efficiency, and provide a solid foundation for the next generation of scientists.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , COVID-19 , Colaboração Intersetorial , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organização & administração , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Academias e Institutos/organização & administração , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Congressos como Assunto , Humanos , Políticas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Sociedades Científicas/organização & administração , Participação dos Interessados , Estados Unidos , Universidades/organização & administração
15.
Neuron ; 109(20): 3182-3183, 2021 10 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672973

RESUMO

Gregory Quirk has worked in New York, Honduras, and Puerto Rico with a decades-long commitment to mentorship and the global promotion of neuroscience. In an interview with Neuron, he talks about his upcoming move to the University of the Philippines and how virtual meetings are making us rethink collaborations and interactions with members of the community.


Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto , Tutoria , Mentores , Neurociências , Comunicação por Videoconferência , COVID-19 , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Neuron ; 109(20): 3184-3186, 2021 10 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672974

RESUMO

In this Neuron Q&A, Joni Wallis shares some of her experiences and the challenges she has faced as a trans woman in neuroscience, her role model, and the importance of considering the life circumstances of scientists beyond their academic work.


Assuntos
Neurociências , Pessoas Transgênero , Equilíbrio Trabalho-Vida , COVID-19 , Congressos como Assunto , Diversidade Cultural , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Neuron ; 109(20): 3190-3192, 2021 10 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672976

RESUMO

In Korea, the pandemic has elevated scientists as trusted sources for both policy decisions and dinner table conversation. In an interview with Neuron, Eunji Cheong discusses how we need to support future generations by fostering scientific thinking, patience, and flexibility.


Assuntos
Neurociências , Formulação de Políticas , Papel Profissional , Pensamento , COVID-19 , Congressos como Assunto , Humanos , República da Coreia , SARS-CoV-2 , Mulheres Trabalhadoras , Equilíbrio Trabalho-Vida
18.
aSEPHallus ; 16(32): 64-77, maio.-out.2021.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1342492

RESUMO

Resumo: Buscou-se, neste artigo, questionar o freudismo autodeclarado de Lacan na Conferência de Caracas com base na identificação de um equívoco de transcrição dessa conferência. Demonstrou-se que, por estar em total desconformidade com o que foi desenvolvido nessa ocasião como um todo, esse equívoco de transcrição não faz outra coisa que evidenciar, ao invés de esconder, a oposição de Lacan a Freud, manifesta nos adjetivos jocosos atribuídos por Lacan à segunda tópica freudiana, legado de Freud que Lacan não compartilha. Demonstrou-se que a filiação de Lacan a Freud faz parte de um projeto rigoroso de revisão crítica por meio do qual Lacan submete os conceitos e articulações propostos por Freud ao que chamou, em 1954, de "método dos comentários", relativo a uma recusa inicial de compreender as formulações freudianas, pela qual, segundo Lacan, empurra-se a porta da compreensão analítica. Por essa razão, propomos, neste trabalho, que Lacan não recusaria a alcunha de ser "apenas" um comentador de Freud. Ao final, o que ficará evidente não é propriamente o tipo de freudismo reivindicado por Lacan, mas aquele que é negado por ele, que, por sua vez, é denegado pela edição da Conferência de Caracas analisada neste trabalho.


L'« étrange ¼ freudisme autoproclamé de Lacan à Caracas : Lacan, juste un commentateur de Freud:Cet article cherche à interroger le freudisme autoproclamé de Lacan dans la Conférence de Caracas à partir de l'identification d'une erreur dans la transcription de cette conférence. On y démontre qu'étant en total désaccord avec ce qui se développait à cette occasion dans son ensemble, cette erreur de transcription ne fait que souligner, plutôt que masquer, l'opposition de Lacan à Freud, manifestée dans les adjectifs moqueurs attribués par Lacan à la seconde topique freudienne, héritage de Freud que Lacan ne partage pas. Ainsi, la démonstration est faite également que l'affiliation de Lacan à Freud s'inscrit dans un projet rigoureux de revue critique à travers lequel Lacan soumet les concepts et articulations proposés par Freud à ce qu'il a appelé, en 1954, la « méthode des commentaires ¼, concernant un refus initial de comprendre les formulations freudiennes, par laquelle, selon Lacan, la porte de la compréhension analytique est poussée. Pour cette raison, nous proposons, dans cet ouvrage, que Lacan ne refuserait pas l'épithète de n'être « que ¼ un commentateur de Freud. À la fin, ce qui deviendra évident, ce n'est pas exactement le type de freudisme revendiqué par Lacan, mais celui qui est nié par lui, ce qui, à son tour, est nié par l'édition de la Conférence de Caracas analysée dans cet ouvrage.


The "strange" Lacan's self-declared Freudianism in the Caracas: Lacan, only a commentator on Freud:This article seeks to question Lacan's self-declared Freudianism in the Caracas Conference based on the identification of a mistake in the transcription of that conference. It was shown that, as it was in total disagreement with what was developed on that occasion as a whole, this mistaken transcription does nothing more than highlight, rather than hide, Lacan's opposition to Freud, manifested in the jocular adjectives attributed by Lacan to the second Freudian topic, a legacy of Freud that Lacan does not share. It was demonstrated that Lacan's affiliation with Freud is part of a rigorous project of critical review through which Lacan submits the concepts and articulations proposed by Freud to what he called, in 1954, the "method of comments", relating to a first refusal to understand Freud's formulations, which, according to Lacan, pushes the door to analytical understanding. For this reason, we propose, in this work, that Lacan would not refuse the epithet of being "only" a commentator on Freud. In the end, what will become evident is not exactly the type of Freudianism claimed by Lacan, but that which is denied by him, which, in turn, is denied by the edition of the Caracas Conference analyzed in this work.


Assuntos
Psicanálise , Teoria Psicanalítica , Congressos como Assunto
20.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 17(10): e1009321, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662331

RESUMO

In 2020, the world faced the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic that drastically altered people's lives. Since then, many countries have been forced to suspend public gatherings, leading to many conference cancellations, postponements, or reorganizations. Switching from a face-to-face to a remote conference became inevitable and the ultimate solution to sustain scientific exchanges at the national and the international levels. The same year, as a committee, we were in charge of organizing the major French annual conference that covers all computational biology areas: The "Journées Ouvertes en Biologie, Informatique et Mathématiques" (JOBIM). Despite the health crisis, we succeeded in changing the conference format from face to face to remote in a very short amount of time. Here, we propose 10 simple rules based on this experience to modify a conference format in an optimized and cost-effective way. In addition to the suggested rules, we decided to emphasize an unexpected benefit of this situation: a significant reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to travel for scientific conference attendance. We believe that even once the SARS-CoV-2 crisis is over, we collectively will have an opportunity to think about the way we approach such scientific events over the longer term.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Biologia Computacional , Congressos como Assunto , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Comunicação por Videoconferência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Biologia Computacional/organização & administração , Estudos de Viabilidade , França , Gases de Efeito Estufa/análise , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Teletrabalho , Viagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...