Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90.837
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(40): e22421, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33019419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery develops rapidly in both elective and emergency settings. The study aimed to determine the role of different laparoscopic methods for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the Cochrane database were searched up to November 2019 to identify all published articles related to the topic. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15. RESULTS: Fourteen publications were included in the analysis. Laparoscopic surgery was applied in 425 patients, and 493 patients underwent open colon resection (OCR). Postoperative mortality, morbidity, severe complications, and reoperation rates were not significantly different between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different laparoscopic methods (laparoscopic colon resection [LCR] and laparoscopic lavage and drainage [LLD]). Subgroup analysis indicated that LCR was superior to OCR in terms of morbidity, while OCR was superior to LLD in terms of severe complications. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of laparoscopic surgery for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis is related to different surgical methods. LCR is suggested to be a better choice according to the postoperative outcomes. More definite conclusions can be drawn in future randomized controlled trials.


Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(40): e22431, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33019422

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the procedural and post-operative complications (POC) associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google scholar for English studies comparing the POC in patients who underwent laparoscopic versus open surgery (OS) for right colonic cancer. Data were assessed by the Cochrane-based RevMan 5.4 software (The Cochrane Community, London, UK). Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the results for continuous variables, whereas risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs were used for dichotomous data. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving a total number of 3410 participants with right colonic carcinoma were included in this analysis. One thousand five hundred and fifteen participants were assigned to undergo invasive laparoscopic surgery whereas 1895 participants were assigned to the open abdominal surgery. Our results showed that the open resection was associated with a shorter length of surgery (MD: 48.63, 95% CI: 30.15-67.12; P = .00001) whereas laparoscopic intervention was associated with a shorter hospital stay [MD (-3.09), 95% CI [-5.82 to (-0.37)]; P = .03]. In addition, POC such as anastomotic leak (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.60-1.55; P = .88), abdominal abscess (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.52-2.49; P = .75), pulmonary embolism (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.09-1.69; P = .21) and deep vein thrombosis (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.39-2.28; P = .89) were not significantly different. Paralytic ileus (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.67-1.11; P = .26), intra-abdominal infection (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.15-4.48; P = .82), pulmonary complications (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.57-1.20; P = .32), cardiac complications (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.42-1.27; P = .27) and urological complications (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.52-1.33; P = .44) were also similarly manifested. Our analysis also showed 30-day re-admission and re-operation, and mortality to be similar between laparoscopic versus OS for right colonic carcinoma resection. However, surgical wound infection (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86; P = .002) was significantly higher with the OS. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, laparoscopic surgery was almost comparable to OS in terms of post-operative outcomes for right-sided colonic cancer resection and was not associated with higher unwanted outcomes. Therefore, laparoscopic intervention should be considered as safe as the open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection, with a decreased hospital stay.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia
3.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(9): 1289-1295, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33027460

RESUMO

Obesity is a chronic disease characterized by excess fat in the body and a real public health problem. Bariatric surgery, in recent decades, has gained space in its treatment due to the efficiency obtained in weight loss and significant reduction of the related comorbidities. The most commonly performed bariatric procedures include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric band, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Possible complications described include fistulas, dehiscence, marginal ulcers, intestinal obstruction, internal hernias, and anastomotic stenosis. These complications may have unfavorable clinical outcomes since symptoms are often nonspecific. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is an important tool in the evaluation of postoperative complications, both in the immediate and late postoperative status of patients undergoing such a procedure. We analyzed the most illustrative tomographic findings of the different complications after reducing gastroplasty in 203 patients without distinction of age or gender. Correct interpretation requires radiologists to understand the surgical technique since postoperative anatomy and surgery-specific complications may be obstacles to proper interpretation.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida
5.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 222, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization. Patients with cancer are more likely to incur poor clinical outcomes. Due to the prevailing pandemic, we propose some surgical strategies for gastric cancer patients. METHODS: The 'COVID-19' period was defined as occurring between 2020 and 01-20 and 2020-03-20. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups, pre-COVID-19 group (PCG) and COVID-19 group (CG). A total of 109 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The waiting time before admission increased by 4 days in the CG (PCG: 4.5 [IQR: 2, 7.8] vs. CG: 8.0 [IQR: 2,20]; p = 0.006). More patients had performed chest CT scans besides abdominal CT before admission during the COVID-19 period (PCG: 22 [32%] vs. CG: 30 [73%], p = 0.001). After admission during the COVID period, the waiting time before surgery was longer (PCG: 3[IQR: 2,5] vs. CG: 7[IQR: 5,9]; p < 0.001), more laparoscopic surgeries were performed (PCG: 51[75%] vs. CG: 38[92%], p = 0.021), and hospital stay period after surgery was longer (7[IQR: 6,8] vs.9[IQR:7,11]; p < 0.001). In addition, the total cost of hospitalization increased during this period, (PCG: 9.22[IQR:7.82,10.97] vs. CG: 10.42[IQR:8.99,12.57]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study provides an opportunity for our surgical colleagues to reflect on their own services and any contingency plans they may have to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Padrões de Prática Médica , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 222, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-810411

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization. Patients with cancer are more likely to incur poor clinical outcomes. Due to the prevailing pandemic, we propose some surgical strategies for gastric cancer patients. METHODS: The 'COVID-19' period was defined as occurring between 2020 and 01-20 and 2020-03-20. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups, pre-COVID-19 group (PCG) and COVID-19 group (CG). A total of 109 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The waiting time before admission increased by 4 days in the CG (PCG: 4.5 [IQR: 2, 7.8] vs. CG: 8.0 [IQR: 2,20]; p = 0.006). More patients had performed chest CT scans besides abdominal CT before admission during the COVID-19 period (PCG: 22 [32%] vs. CG: 30 [73%], p = 0.001). After admission during the COVID period, the waiting time before surgery was longer (PCG: 3[IQR: 2,5] vs. CG: 7[IQR: 5,9]; p < 0.001), more laparoscopic surgeries were performed (PCG: 51[75%] vs. CG: 38[92%], p = 0.021), and hospital stay period after surgery was longer (7[IQR: 6,8] vs.9[IQR:7,11]; p < 0.001). In addition, the total cost of hospitalization increased during this period, (PCG: 9.22[IQR:7.82,10.97] vs. CG: 10.42[IQR:8.99,12.57]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study provides an opportunity for our surgical colleagues to reflect on their own services and any contingency plans they may have to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Padrões de Prática Médica , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2020: 1658-1661, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33018314

RESUMO

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery is a minimally invasive surgery to remove the gallbladder, where surgical instruments are inserted through small incisions in the abdomen with the help of a laparoscope. Identification of tool presence and precise segmentation of tools from the video is very important in understanding the quality of the surgery and training budding surgeons. Precise segmentation of tools is required to track the tools during real-time surgeries. In this paper, a new pixel-wise instance segmentation algorithm is proposed, which segments and localizes the surgical tool using spatio-temporal deep network. The performance of the proposed has been compared with the state-of-the-art image-based instance segmentation method using the Cholec80 dataset. It is also compared with methods in the literature using frame-level presence detection and spatial detection with good results.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Laparoscopia , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
9.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 100(34): 2652-2657, 2020 Sep 15.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921012

RESUMO

Objective: To analyze the risk factors of postoperative intestinal obstruction (POI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: The clinical data of 573 patients receiving RARP from January to December 2019 in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to the occurrence of POI, the cases were divided into the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and the risk factors of POI were investigated by multivariate logistic regression. Results: Forty-five of 573 patients (7.9%) had POI. Between the two groups, preoperative underlying diseases (cardiopathy, COPD, hypoalbuminemia), preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative WBC, operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative early fever, length of stay were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that heart disease (OR=2.331, P=0.036), COPD (OR=4.285, P=0.001), hypoalbuminemia(OR=2.142, P=0.026), blood loss (≥4.26 ml/kg) (OR=2.388, P=0.010), operative time (≥225 min) (OR=4.200, P<0.001), and postoperative early fever (OR=2.773, P=0.004) were independent risk factors for POI after RARP. Conclusions: The incidence of POI following RARP is related to multiple perioperative factors. Improving the preoperative heart and lung function, correcting hypoalbuminemia, reducing intraoperative bleeding, shortening the operation time, and preventing early postoperative infection may be important measures to reduce the risk of POI in RARP patients.


Assuntos
Obstrução Intestinal , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
10.
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(3): 106-110, jul.-sept. 2020. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-189900

RESUMO

La convivencia con la infección por COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) en todos los entornos hospitalarios y de salud supone un reto actual de adaptación, creación de circuitos, protocolos y nuevos modelos de asistencia. Son todavía bastantes las incógnitas a resolver sobre esta infección en la actualidad, y mucho más desconocido es el impacto que la misma supone si lo trasladamos al terreno quirúrgico. La evidencia respecto al efecto del SARS-CoV-2 y cirugía laparoscópica es escasa y de calidad limitada, pero aun así, la laparoscopia ha sido considerada de elección por las distintas sociedades científicas en pacientes COVID para la mayoría de indicaciones en ginecología, por las conocidas ventajas hacia el paciente respecto a la vía abierta: menor morbilidad y estancia hospitalaria y porque comporta procedimientos quirúrgicos autónomos y contenidos respecto a la liberación de humo y donde, además, el instrumental y la disposición en quirófano permiten un alejamiento del cirujano y del resto de profesionales en el área quirúrgica respecto al paciente. A modo global, las dos recomendaciones fundamentales en quirófano de cirugía laparoscópica en esta época COVID incluyen: el uso de equipo de protección personal adecuado para el personal de quirófano y la adopción de precauciones para reducir la exposición al CO2 y el humo quirúrgico que puede producirse en estos procedimientos


Coexistence with COVID-19 infection (coronavirus disease 2019) in all hospital and health care settings is a current challenge of adaptation, as well as the creation of new protocols and care models. At present, there are still many unknowns about this infection, and much more unknown is the impact into the surgical field. Although evidence regarding the effect of SARS-CoV-2 and laparoscopic surgery is scarce, laparoscopy has been considered the method of choice by different scientific societies for most indications in gynaecology during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is due to the advantages over the open route. There is less morbidity and hospital stay, and in addition, as it involves autonomous and contained surgical procedures with respect to smoke release. Moreover, the instruments and the setting in the operating room mean that there can be safe distance from the surgeon and other staff to the patient. Overall, the main recommendations in laparoscopic surgery during the COVID era include: the use of Personal Protective Equipment for operating room personnel, and the adoption of safety measures to reduce CO2 exposure and surgical smoke reléase


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Algoritmos , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Aerossóis/normas , RNA Viral/sangue , Fatores de Risco
11.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 194, 2020 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32867744

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested differences in postoperative outcomes between patients with obesity and those without following adrenalectomy, but these remained to be ascertained with synthesis of available evidence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association between obesity and outcomes of patients after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Global Index Medicus, and Web of Science, without language restriction, to identify cohort studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 6, 2019. We considered studies with data comparing outcomes of adults with and without obesity after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool study-specific estimates. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018117070. RESULTS: Five studies with data on a pooled sample of 353 patients with obesity and 828 without were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was moderate to low. We found no association between obesity and the various stages of postoperative complications: Clavien-Dindo grade 1 (OR = 1.57; 95%CI = 0.55-4.48; I2 = 44.6%), grade 2 (OR = 1.12; 95%CI = 0.54-2.32; I2 = 0.0%), grade 3 (OR = 1.79; 95%CI = 0.58-5.47; I2 = 0.0%;), grade 4 (OR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.05-3.71; I2 = 0.0%), and grade 5 (death) (OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.02-14.31). Furthermore, no association was found between obesity and readmission rates (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.13-3.62) and conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.16-2.34; I2 = 19.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that obesity is not associated with complications following laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This meta-analysis might have been underpowered to detect a true association between obesity and patient outcome after laparoscopic adrenalectomy due to the small number of included studies. Larger studies are needed to clarify the role of obesity in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.


Assuntos
Adrenalectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Adulto , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório
12.
Hinyokika Kiyo ; 66(8): 251-257, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882121

RESUMO

The clinical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was retrospectively investigated taking into consideration the surgeon's position during the procedure. The study cohort included 184 consecutive patients who had undergone LRP performed by a single surgeon from February 2013 to July 2018. During the study period,the surgeon stood alternately on either the left or right side of the patient. The D'Amico risk classification was low,intermediate and high in 26 (14.1%),45 (24.5%) and 113 (61.4%) patients,respectively. Mean surgical duration was 203.5 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 437.6 ml. Nerve sparing (NS) was implemented in 82 (44. 6%) patients. The mean period of having an indwelling urethral catheter was 5. 0 days. Perioperative Clavien-Dindo degree ≥IIIa complications occurred in three (1.6%) patients. Except for cases with presurgical hormonal treatment,surgical margins were positive in 41 (22.3%) patients,among whom 23 (17.4%) had pT2 disease. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 81.4%,and 84.8% of patients regained urinary continence at 12 months after surgery. Where the surgeon stood during LRP was not associated with significant differences in any parameter. However,the margin positive rate was higher on the side away from where the surgeon stood than the side closer to the surgeon (70.7% vs 29.3%). In conclusion,the position of the surgeon during LRP does not influence the outcome.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 55(9): 589-599, 2020 Sep 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957747

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the long-term oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (lymph-vascular space invasion-positive, LVSI+)- Ⅰb1 cervical cancer patients with different tumor sizes. Methods: Based on the Big Database of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Cancer in China (1538 project database), patients with stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI+)-Ⅰb1 cervical cancer who treated by laparoscopic or abdominal surgery were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the two surgical approaches were compared under 1∶1 propensity score matching (PSM) in different tumor diameter stratification. Results: (1) A total of 4 891 patients with stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI+)-Ⅰb1 cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2016 were included in the 1538 project database. Among them, 1 926 cases in the laparoscopic group and 2 965 cases in the abdominal group. There were no difference in 5-year OS and 5-year DFS between the two groups before matching. Cox multivariate analysis suggested that laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower 5-year DFS (HR=1.367, 95%CI: 1.105-1.690, P=0.004). After 1∶1 PSM matching, 1 864 patients were included in each group, and there was no difference in 5-year OS between the two groups (94.1% vs 95.4%, P=0.151). While, the inferior 5-year DFS was observed in the laparoscopic group (89.0% vs 92.3%, P=0.004). And the laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower 5-year DFS (HR=1.420, 95%CI: 1.109-1.818, P=0.006). (2) In stratification analysis of different tumor sizes, and there were no difference in 5-year OS and 5-year DFS between the laparoscopic group and abdominal group in tumor size ≤1 cm, >1-2 cm and >2-3 cm stratification (all P>0.05). Cox multivariate analysis showed that laparoscopic surgery were not related to 5-year OS and 5-year DFS (P>0.05). In the stratification of tumor size >3-4 cm, there was no difference in 5-year OS between the two groups (P>0.05). The 5-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was worse than that in the abdominal group (75.7% vs 85.8%, P=0.025). Cox multivariate analysis suggested that laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower 5-year DFS (HR=1.705, 95%CI: 1.088-2.674, P=0.020). Conclusions: For patients with stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI+)-Ⅰb1 cervical cancer, laparoscopic surgery is associated with lower 5-year DFS, and the adverse effect of laparoscopic surgery on oncology prognosis is mainly reflected in patients with tumor size >3-4 cm. For patients with tumor sizes ≤1 cm, >1-2 cm and >2-3 cm, there are no difference in oncological prognosis between the two surgical approaches.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , China/epidemiologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 55(9): 600-608, 2020 Sep 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957748

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed by reviewing medical records of patients with staging Ⅰb1-Ⅱa2 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2009) cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal radical hysterectomy from 2007 to 2017 in the Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The difference among clinicopathologic characteristics, surgery-related parameters and complications, and prognosis were analyzed between the laparoscopic group and abdominal group. Results: Two hundreds and ninety-three patients were included with 88 cases in laparoscopic group and 205 cases in abdominal group. (1) There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05), including age, body mass index, menopause status, history of abdominal surgery, clinical stage, tumor diameter, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, differentiation, lymph-vascular space invasion, positive of surgical margin, parametrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis. But the abdominal group showed a higher proportion of deep stromal invasion (38.5% vs 25.0%, P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between two groups with number of lymph nodes resected, urinary catheter retention, short-term surgical complications (including ureteral injury, ileus, infection, hydronephrosis and poor wound healing), and long-term complications (including voiding dysfunction, defecation dysfunction and lower limb edema; all P>0.05). (2) The laparoscopic group was significantly associated with a longer operation time [(260±51) minutes vs (244±53) minutes, P<0.05], but less bleeding (100 ml vs 300 ml, P<0.01), shorter hospital stay [(13±5) days vs (16±8) days, P<0.01] and lower incidence of lymphedema (12.5% vs 27.8%, P<0.01). (3) The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 85.7% vs 86.4%, P=0.971) and 5-year overall survival (OS; 91.4% vs 93.0%, P=0.657) of laparoscopic group were comparable to that of abdominal group. (4) Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node metastasis (HR=2.44, 95%CI: 1.16-5.15, P=0.019) was independent poor prognostic factors related to PFS, while adenosquamous carcinoma (HR=2.54, 95%CI: 1.02-6.35, P=0.046), lymph-vascular space invasion (HR=3.86, 95%CI: 1.60-9.33, P=0.003) and lymph node metastasis (HR=5.92, 95%CI: 2.45-14.34, P<0.01) were independent poor prognostic factors related to OS. The laparoscopy surgery was not an independent poor prognostic factor (P=0.396). Conclusion: The laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma has comparable prognosis to abdominal radical hysterectomy with a higher surgery quality.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , China/epidemiologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
15.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 55(9): 609-616, 2020 Sep 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957749

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer in stage Ⅰb2-Ⅱa2 undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy or abdominal radical hysterectomy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018, patients with stage Ⅰb2-Ⅱa2 who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal radical hysterectomy (laparoscopic group and abdominal group) in Peking University People's Hospital were collected. The clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 237 cases in this study, including 115 cases in laparoscopic group and 122 cases in abdominal group. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgery-related complications, recurrence and death were analyzed between the two groups. The related factors of recurrence and death were also analyzed.During laparoscopic surgery, the pressure of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum were controlled, to try avoid the tumor tissue in the vagina from being exposed to the abdominal cavity when taking out the uterine specimen through the vagina, and fully flushed the abdominal cavity with sterile water after the specimen was taken out. Results: (1) Clinicopathological characteristics: there was no significant differences between the two groups among age, pathological type, pathological grade, clinical stage, depth of interstitial infiltration, lymph node metastasis,parametrial infiltration, vaginal stump infiltration, lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant treatments (all P>0.05). (2) Surgery-related complications: the incidence of surgery-related complications in the laparoscopic group and the abdominal group were 32.2% (37/115) and 25.4% (31/122), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). (3) Recurrence and death: during the follow-up period, the recurrence rates of the laparoscopic group and the abdominal group were respectively 15.7% (18/115) and 12.3% (15/122). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.456). The 5-year overall survival rates of the laparoscopic group and the open group were 86.8% and 87.8%, and the 5-year tumor-free survival rates were 81.7% and 84.6%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P=0.405, P=0.429). (4) Analysis of related factors of recurrence and death: univariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, vaginal stump infiltration, LVSI and interstitial infiltration depth were risk factors for postoperative recurrence of cervical cancer patients (all P<0.05); neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, parametrial infiltration, vaginal stump infiltration, LVSI and interstitial infiltration depth were risk factors for postoperative death in patients with cervical cancer (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence and death of cervical cancer patients (P<0.05). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer in stage Ⅰb2-Ⅱa2 undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with non-touch operative technique and abdominal radical hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade
16.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 55(9): 617-623, 2020 Sep 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957750

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of different laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Methods: From January 2011 to December 2014, the laparoscopic operation cases of cervical cancer at stage Ⅰb1, Ⅰb2, Ⅱa1 and Ⅱa2, including the histologic subtypes of squamous-cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, were collected in five clinical centers. The data were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedures, that is, modified laparoscopic-vaginal radical hysterectomy (mLVRH) and total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH). The overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival rate (DFS) at 5 years were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Results: There were 674 cases in total, including 377 cases of mLVRH, 297 cases of TLRH. (1) The OS at 5 years: the mLVRH was 96.1% and the TLRH was 92.0%, and the mLVRH was higher than that of TLRH (P=0.010). Stratify analysis, including stage of disease (Ⅰb1 and Ⅱa1), histologic subtypes (squamous-cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma), lymph node metastasis, revealed that, ① Stage of disease: in stage Ⅰb1, the OS at five years of mLVRH was higher than that in TLRH group (98.6% vs 93.6%, P=0.012). In stage Ⅱa1, there was significant difference between the two groups, the OS at five years of mLVRH and TLRH were 93.6% and 77.6% (P=0.007). ② Histologic subtypes: for the OS at five years of squamous-cell carcinoma, mLVRH and TLRH were 96.1% and 92.3%, and there was significant difference (P=0.046); for adenocarcinoma, the OS at five years were 91.0% and 88.6%, and there was no difference between two groups (P=0.230). ③ Lymph node metastasis: the mLVRH and TLRH with lymph node metastasis, the OS at five years were 98.6% and 96.4%; the mLVRH and TLRH without lymph node metastasis, the OS at five years were 89.3% and 80.8%. There were no significant differences between the two groups,respectively (P=0.156, P=0.093). (2) The DFS at 5 years: there was no significant difference between mLVRH and TLRH (94.1% vs 90.9%, P=0.220). Stratify analysis for stage of disease, the mLVRH group was higher than that in the TLRH group in stage Ⅰb1 (97.0% vs 92.8%, P=0.039). However, for stage Ⅱa1, there was no significant difference between mLVRH and TLRH group (88.2% vs 75.8%, P=0.074). Conclusions: The results of this retrospective study indicated that different laparoscopy surgical procedures had diverse oncologic outcomes. The OS at 5 years of the mLVRH is superior to the TLRH. The DFS at 5 years in Ⅰb1 stage, the mLVRH is higher than the TLRH. Therefore, the modified laparoscopy is still an alternative surgery for early cervical cancer patients when following the principle of no-tumor-exposure.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(33): e21557, 2020 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872005

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH) in children with inguinal hernia. METHODS: PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were searched to select trials from their inception till April 2019. The summary of relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to evaluate the treatment effectiveness between LH and OH. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 594 children were selected. No significant differences were observed between LH and OH regarding the risk of postoperative complications. However, LH significantly reduced the risk of major postoperative complications when compared with OH. Moreover, LH showed association with a shorter operative time in bilateral inguinal hernia when compared with OH, whereas no significant difference between groups for unilateral inguinal hernia. Finally, children who received LH showed association with longer time to discharge than those who received OH, whereas no significant difference was observed between the groups for time to resume full activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that children who received LH had protection against major postoperative complications than those who received OH. Moreover, children who received LH had shorter operative time, and longer time to discharge.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Criança , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
18.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (8): 5-16, 2020.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869609

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To improve treatment outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis (AA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An internet survey was performed. Questionnaire consisted of 15 questions concerning diagnosis and treatment of AA: application of prognostic scales, incidence and technical aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative management, compliance with international and national clinical guidelines. A total of 690 questionnaires were received and analyzed (3.67% of all surgeons in the Russian Federation). RESULTS: Eighteen percent of respondents use at least one prognostic scale. The vast majority of surgeons (92%) use antibiotic prophylaxis. Almost half of respondents place trocars in the triangulation position (44%), one third of surgeons ligate the mesentery of the appendix (35%), most respondents perform mesoappendectomy (60%) with monopolar and bipolar cautery. Forty-five percent of all respondents do not invert the appendix stump. Significant number of respondents use abdominal drainage routinely. Only 3.5% of surgeons use multimodal postoperative analgesia. Less than 22% of patients are operated under low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Standardization of surgical technique and perioperative approaches including those specified in the guidelines is absent. We also found insufficient awareness of surgeons about international and national clinical guidelines. CONCLUSION: This study may be useful for standardizing treatment approaches, choosing the best practice, popularizing and improving of current clinical guidelines.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Apendicectomia/normas , Apendicite/terapia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pesquisas sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Internet , Laparoscopia , Assistência Perioperatória , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Federação Russa
19.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (8): 103-106, 2020.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869622

RESUMO

The authors describe modern 3D technologies in hepatobiliary surgery. These approaches reduce the risk of intra- and postoperative complications. Virtual 3D reconstruction with clear visualization of parasitic cyst, adjacent vessels and bile ducts is valuable to create 3D-model of liver. This model may be applied for personalized laparoscopic approach and precise surgical intervention.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/métodos , Hepatectomia/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Fígado/cirurgia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Ductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(33): e21603, 2020 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872015

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Schwannomas of the seminal vesicles are extremely rare, and only cases of single seminal vesicle schwannomas have been reported. Here, we report a case of multiple schwannoma of the seminal vesicle. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a rare case of multiple schwannoma of the seminal vesicle that occurred in a 48-year-old man during physical examination. Multiple mixed masses in the left region of the seminal vesicle were documented with transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. The patient presented no clinical symptoms, no family history of the disease and no history of genetic disease. DIAGNOSIS: Postoperative pathology revealed a diagnosis of seminal vesical schwannoma. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to remove the mass. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered rapidly and the length of hospitalization was 6 days after operation. At present, there is no recurrence in 10 month follow up. LESSONS: Whether benign or malignant, single or multiple, schwannomas still need to be diagnosed by pathology because of the limitations of examination methods. Surgical resection is still the preferred treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/patologia , Neurilemoma/patologia , Glândulas Seminais/patologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neurilemoma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Glândulas Seminais/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA