Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28.626
Filtrar
2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(7): 1038-1046, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950296

RESUMO

Managed care plans, which contract with states to cover three-quarters of Medicaid enrollees, play a crucial role in addressing the drug epidemic in the United States. However, substance use disorder benefits vary across Medicaid managed care plans, and it is unclear what role states play in regulating their activities. To address this question, we surveyed thirty-three states and Washington, D.C., regarding their substance use disorder treatment coverage and utilization management requirements for Medicaid managed care plans in 2021. Most states mandated coverage of common forms of substance use disorder treatment and prohibited annual maximums and enrollee cost sharing in managed care. Fewer than one-third of states forbade managed care plans from imposing prior authorization for each treatment service. For most treatment medications, fewer than two-thirds of states prohibited prior authorization, drug testing, "fail first," or psychosocial therapy requirements in managed care. Our findings suggest that many states give managed care plans broad discretion to impose requirements on covered substance use disorder treatments, which may affect access to lifesaving care.


Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Estados Unidos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Autorização Prévia
3.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(7): 1032-1037, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950299

RESUMO

As people lose Medicaid because of the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, many states will route former Medicaid managed care enrollees into Affordable Care Act Marketplace coverage with the same carrier. In 2021, 52.1 percent of Medicaid managed care enrollees were enrolled by a carrier that also had a plan on the Marketplace in the same county.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trocas de Seguro de Saúde , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Trocas de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Seguradoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino
4.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1423736, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952729

RESUMO

The continuation of high-quality care is under threat for the over 70 million children in the United States. Inequities between Medicaid and Medicare payments and the current procedural-based reimbursement model have resulted in the undervaluing of pediatric medical care and lack of prioritization of children's health by institutions. The number of pediatricians, including pediatric subspecialists, and pediatric healthcare centers are declining due to mounting financial obstacles and this crucial healthcare supply is no longer able to keep up with demand. The reasons contributing to these inequities are clear and rational: Medicaid has significantly lower rates of reimbursement compared to Medicare, yet Medicaid covers almost half of children in the United States and creates the natural incentive for medical institutions to prioritize the care of adults. Additionally, certain aspects of children's healthcare are unique from adults and are not adequately covered in the current payment model. The result of decades of devaluing children's healthcare has led to a substantial decrease in the availability of services, medications, and equipment needed to provide healthcare to children across the nation. Fortunately, the solution is just as clear as the problem: we must value the healthcare of children as much as that of adults by increasing Medicaid funding to be on par with Medicare and appreciate the complexities of care beyond procedures. If these changes are not made, the high-quality care for children in the US will continue to decline and increase strain on the overall healthcare system as these children age into adulthood.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Medicare , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Criança , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1360349, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38983260

RESUMO

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to prevent new HIV infections, but it is unclear how state policies governing sexual and reproductive health services (SRH) impact access for cisgender women. The objective of this review is to identify barriers to PrEP access for cisgender women in the United States. Using the CDC Atlas Program, 20 states with the highest HIV incidence among cisgender women were included in this analysis. Through a search conducted in May-July 2022 of CDC, PrEPWatch.org, and other State Department and Insurance websites, Medicaid expansion status, pharmacist PrEP prescribing laws, financial support programs, and Traditional Medicaid coverage of PrEP, HIV testing, and emergency contraception were reviewed. Of the included states, nearly half did not expand Medicaid at the state level. Emergency contraception and HIV testing was covered under Traditional Medicaid for almost all included states, but insurance stipulations and eligibility requirements remain. Although PrEP is covered under all Traditional Medicaid plans, six states require pre-authorization. Three states have HIV testing mandates, four allow pharmacists to prescribe PrEP and six have financial support programs to cover the cost of PrEP. Medicaid expansion, pre-authorization requirements for PrEP prescriptions and emergency contraception, and limitations on pharmacist prescribing abilities were identified as barriers to SRH access for cisgender women. Medicaid expansion should be prioritized as an approach to expanding access to HIV prevention services at the state level.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicaid , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo Estadual , Saúde Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(7): e203-e209, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995824

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with clinicians' likelihood and intensity of applying fluoride varnish (FV) overall and for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using claims data. METHODS: Using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (2016-2018), we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of 2911 clinicians (7277 clinician-year observations) providing well-child visits to children aged 1 to 5 years. Zero-inflated negative binomial models estimated the probability of a clinician applying FV and the number of visits with FV applications, overall and separately for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. RESULTS: A total of 30.9% of clinician-years applied FV at least once, and overall, an average of 8.4% of a clinician's well-child visits included FV annually. Controlling for all covariates, having a higher percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.45) and a higher expected number of applications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09). Additionally, having a higher percentage of patients aged 1 to 5 years was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43), but not the number of applications. Similar associations were observed among visits paid by private insurers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical recommendations and mandated insurance reimbursements, the likelihood and intensity of FV applications was low for most pediatric primary care clinicians. Clinician behavior was associated with patient-panel characteristics, suggesting the need for interventions that account for these differences.


Assuntos
Fluoretos Tópicos , Medicaid , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Fluoretos Tópicos/uso terapêutico , Fluoretos Tópicos/administração & dosagem , Massachusetts , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2421491, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995648

RESUMO

This cohort study examines patterns of Medicaid coverage in the first 3 years of life among children with sickle cell disease across 5 states.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Medicaid , Humanos , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Estados Unidos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Masculino , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Criança
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2422406, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39012632

RESUMO

Importance: Hepatitis C can be cured with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), but Medicaid programs have implemented fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber restrictions to control costs. Although restrictions are easing, understanding their association with hepatitis C treatment rates is crucial to inform policies that increase access to lifesaving treatment. Objective: To estimate the association of jurisdictional (50 states and Washington, DC) DAA restrictions and Medicaid expansion with the number of Medicaid recipients with filled prescriptions for DAAs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available Medicaid documents and claims data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, to compare the number of unique Medicaid recipients treated with DAAs in each jurisdiction year with Medicaid expansion status and categories of fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber restrictions. Medicaid recipients from all 50 states and Washington, DC, during the study period were included. Multilevel Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between Medicaid expansion and DAA restrictive policies on jurisdictional Medicaid DAA prescription fills. Data were analyzed initially from August 15 to November 15, 2023, and subsequently from April 15 to May 9, 2024. Exposures: Jurisdictional Medicaid expansion status and fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber DAA restrictions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of people treated with DAAs per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year. Results: A total of 381 373 Medicaid recipients filled DAA prescriptions during the study period (57.3% aged 45-64 years; 58.7% men; 15.2% non-Hispanic Black and 52.2% non-Hispanic White). Medicaid nonexpansion jurisdictions had fewer filled DAA prescriptions per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year than expansion jurisdictions (38.6 vs 86.6; adjusted relative risk [ARR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.52-0.61]). Jurisdictions with F3 to F4 (34.0 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.37-0.66]) or F1 to F2 fibrosis restrictions (61.9 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.59-0.66]) had lower treatment rates than jurisdictions without fibrosis restrictions (94.8 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year). Compared with no sobriety restrictions (113.5 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year), 6 to 12 months of sobriety (38.3 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.61-0.71]) and screening and counseling requirements (84.7 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.83-0.92]) were associated with reduced treatment rates, while 1 to 5 months of sobriety was not statistically significantly different. Compared with no prescriber restrictions (97.8 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year), specialist consult restrictions was associated with increased treatment (66.2 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]), while specialist required restrictions were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, Medicaid nonexpansion status, fibrosis, and sobriety restrictions were associated with a reduction in the number of people with Medicaid who were treated for hepatitis C. Removing DAA restrictions might facilitate treatment of more people diagnosed with hepatitis C.


Assuntos
Antivirais , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 825, 2024 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39020336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a critical source of care for medically underserved populations and often serve as medical homes for individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). Many FQHCs provide mental health services and could facilitate access to mental health treatment within and outside of FQHCs. This study compared mental health care utilization and acute care events for adult Medicaid enrollees with SMI who receive care at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) vs. other settings. METHODS: This study used the 2015-2016 Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database to examine outpatient mental health care and acute care events for 32,330 Medicaid adults, ages 18-64 and with major depressive, bipolar, or schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), who resided in FQHC service areas and received care from FQHCs vs. other settings in 2015. Multivariable linear regressions assessed associations between receiving care at FQHCs and outpatient mental health visits, psychotropic medication fills, and acute care events in 2016. RESULTS: There were 8,887 (27.5%) adults in the study population (N = 32,330) who had at least one FQHC visit in 2015. Those who received care at FQHCs were more likely to have outpatient mental health visits (73.3% vs. 71.2%) and psychotropic medication fills (73.2% vs. 69.0%, both p < .05), including antidepressants among those with depressive disorders and antipsychotics among those with SSD. They were more likely to have ED visits (74.0% vs. 68.7%), but less likely to be hospitalized (27.8% vs. 31.9%, both p < .05). However, there was no significant difference in the likelihood of having an acute psychiatric hospitalization (9.5% vs. 9.8%, p = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicaid enrollees with SMIs who had access to care at FQHCs, those receiving care at FQHCs were more likely to have outpatient mental health visits and psychotropic medication fills, with lower rates of hospitalization, suggesting potentially improved quality of outpatient care. Higher ED visit rates among those receiving care at FQHCs warrant additional investigation.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Transtornos Mentais , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Massachusetts , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2418217, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980678

RESUMO

Importance: Untreated tooth decay is disproportionately present among low-income young children. While American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines require pediatric clinicians to implement oral health care, the effectiveness of these oral health interventions has been inconclusive. Objective: To test the effectiveness of multilevel interventions in increasing dental attendance and reducing untreated decay among young children attending well-child visits (WCVs). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pediatric Providers Against Cavities in Children's Teeth study is a cluster randomized clinical trial that was conducted at 18 pediatric primary care practices in northeast Ohio. The trial data were collected between November 2017 and July 2022, with data analyses conducted from August 2022 to March 2023. Eligible participants included Medicaid-enrolled preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years attending WCVs at participating practices who were enrolled at baseline (WCV 1) and followed-up for 2 consecutive examinations (WCV 2 and WCV 3). Interventions: Clinicians in the intervention group received both the practice-level (electronic medical record changes to document oral health) and clinician-level (common-sense model of self-regulation theory-based oral health education and skills training) interventions. Control group clinicians received AAP-based standard oral health education alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dental attendance was determined through clinical dental examinations conducted by hygienists utilizing International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria and also from Medicaid claims data. Untreated decay was determined through clinical examinations. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach was used for both clinical examinations and Medicaid claims data. Results: Eighteen practices were randomized to either intervention or control. Participants included 63 clinicians (mean [SD] age, 47.0 [11.3] years; 48 female [76.2%] and 15 male [23.8%]; 28 in the intervention group [44.4%]; 35 in the control group [55.6%]) and 1023 parent-child dyads (mean [SD] child age, 56.1 [14.0] months; 555 male children [54.4%] and 466 female children [45.6%]; 517 in the intervention group [50.5%]; 506 in the control group [49.5%]). Dental attendance from clinical examinations was significantly higher in the intervention group (170 children [52.0%]) vs control group (150 children [43.1%]) with a difference of 8.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 16.4%; P = .02). The GEE model using clinical examinations showed a significant increase in dental attendance in the intervention group vs control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69). From Medicaid claims, the control group had significantly higher dental attendance than the intervention group at 2 years (332 children [79.6%] vs 330 children [73.7%]; P = .04) but not at 3 years. A clinically but not statistically significant reduction in mean number of untreated decay was found in the intervention group compared with controls (B = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, children in the intervention group had better dental outcomes as was evidenced by increased dental attendance and lower untreated decay. These findings suggest that intervention group clinicians comprehensively integrated oral health services into WCVs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385629.


Assuntos
Cárie Dentária , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Feminino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Cárie Dentária/terapia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Ohio , Estados Unidos , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/métodos , Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2420737, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980680

RESUMO

This cross-sectional study provides a multistate description of utilization of Medicaid-covered peer support services in 2019 by enrollees with opioid use disorder (OUD).


Assuntos
Medicaid , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Grupo Associado , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 781, 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982401

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Birthing people in the United States face numerous challenges when accessing adequate prenatal care (PNC), with transportation being a significant obstacle. Nevertheless, previous studies that relied solely on the distance to the nearest provider cannot differentiate the effects of travel burden on provider selection and care utilization. These may exaggerate the degree of inequality in access and fail to capture perceived travel burden. This study investigated whether travel distances to the initially visited provider, to the predominant PNC provider, and perceived travel burden (measured by the travel disadvantage index (TDI)) are associated with PNC utilization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of people with live births were identified from South Carolina Medicaid claims files in 2015-2018. Travel distances were calculated using Google Maps. The estimated TDI was derived from local pilot survey data. PNC utilization was measured by PNC initiation and frequency. Repeated measure logistic regression test was utilized for categorical variables and one-way repeated measures ANOVA for continuous variables. Unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regressions with repeated measure were utilized to examine the association of travel burdens with PNC usage. RESULTS: For 25,801 pregnancies among those continuously enrolled in Medicaid, birthing people traveled an average of 24.9 and 24.2 miles to their initial and predominant provider, respectively, with an average TDI of -11.4 (SD, 8.5). Of these pregnancies, 60% initiated PNC in the first trimester, with an average of 8 total visits. Compared to the specialties of initial providers, predominant providers were more likely to be OBGYN-related specialists (81.6% vs. 87.9%, p < .001) and midwives (3.5% vs. 4.3%, p < .001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that every doubling of travel distance was associated with less likelihood to initiate timely PNC (OR: 0.95, p < .001) and a lower visit frequency (OR: 0.85, p < .001), and every doubling of TDI was associated with less likelihood to initiate timely PNC (OR: 0.94, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the association between travel burden and PNC utilization was statistically significant but of limited practical significance.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicaid , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Viagem , Humanos , Feminino , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , South Carolina , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Cancer Med ; 13(13): e7461, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage for people with low income in the United States. Expanded insurance coverage could promote more timely access to cancer treatment, which could improve overall survival (OS), yet the long-term effects of Medicaid expansion (ME) remain unknown. We evaluated whether ME was associated with improved timely treatment initiation (TTI) and 3-year OS among patients with breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancers who were affected by the policy. METHODS: Medicaid-insured or uninsured patients aged 40-64 with stage I-III breast, cervical, colon, or non-small cell lung cancer within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to compare changes in TTI (within 60 days) and 3-year OS between patients in ME states versus nonexpansion (NE) states before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2018) ME. Adjusted DID estimates for TTI and 3-year OS were calculated using multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models, respectively. RESULTS: ME was associated with a relative increase in TTI within 60 days for breast (DID = 4.6; p < 0.001), cervical (DID = 5.0 p = 0.013), and colon (DID = 4.0, p = 0.008), but not lung cancer (p = 0.505). In Cox regression analysis, ME was associated with improved 3-year OS for breast (DID hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, p = 0.009), cervical (DID-HR = 0.81, p = 0.048), and lung (DID-HR = 0.87, p = 0.003). Changes in 3-year OS for colon cancer were not statistically different between ME and NE states (DID-HR, 0.77; p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that expanded insurance coverage can improve treatment and survival outcomes among low income and uninsured patients with cancer. As the debate surrounding ME continues nationwide, our findings serve as valuable insights to inform the development of policies aimed at fostering accessible and affordable healthcare for all.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Neoplasias , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Adulto , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 814, 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity (CMC) comprise < 1% of the pediatric population, but account for nearly one-third of healthcare expenditures. Further, while CMC account for up to 80% of pediatric inpatient hospital costs, only 2% of Medicaid spending is attributed to home healthcare. As a result, the current health system heavily relies on family caregivers to fill existing care gaps. This study aimed to: (1) examine factors associated with hospital admissions among CMC and (2) contextualize the potential for home nursing care to improve outcomes among CMC and their families in South Carolina (SC). METHODS: This mixed-methods study was conducted among CMC, their family caregivers, and physicians in SC. Electronic health records data from a primary care clinic within a large health system (7/1/2022-6/30/2023) was analyzed. Logistic regression examined factors associated with hospitalizations among CMC. In-depth interviews (N = 15) were conducted among physicians and caregivers of CMC statewide. Patient-level quantitative data is triangulated with conceptual findings from interviews. RESULTS: Overall, 39.87% of CMC experienced ≥ 1 hospitalization in the past 12 months. CMC with higher hospitalization risk were dependent on respiratory or neurological/neuromuscular medical devices, not non-Hispanic White, and demonstrated higher healthcare utilization. Interview findings contextualized efforts to reduce hospitalizations, and suggested adaptations related to capacity and willingness to provide complex care for CMC and their families. CONCLUSIONS: Findings may inform multi-level solutions for accessible, high-quality home nursing care among CMC and their families. Providers may learn from caregivers' insight to emphasize family-centered care practices, acknowledging time and financial constraints while optimizing the quality of medical care provided in the home.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , South Carolina , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Lactente , Cuidadores/psicologia , Estados Unidos , Medicaid
16.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(7): e242187, 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028653

RESUMO

Importance: Most dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries are enrolled in bifurcated insurance programs that pay for different components of care. Therefore, policymakers are prioritizing expansion of integrated care plans (ICPs) that manage both Medicare and Medicaid benefits and spending. Objective: To review evidence of the association between ICPs and health care spending, quality, utilization, and patient outcomes among dual-eligible beneficiaries. Evidence Review: A search was conducted of PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1, 2010, through November 1, 2023) and Google Scholar (January 1, 2010, through October 1, 2023) and augmented with reports from US federal and state government websites. Three categories of ICPs were evaluated: Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), Medicare-Medicaid Plans (MMPs), and Fully Integrated Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (FIDE-SNPs) and related models aligning Medicare and Medicaid coverage. The review included studies that evaluated beneficiaries dually eligible for and enrolled in full Medicaid; compared an ICP to a nonintegrated arrangement; and evaluated utilization, spending, care coordination, patient experience, or health for 100 or more beneficiaries. Findings: In all, 26 ICP evaluations met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 5 of PACE, 13 of MMPs, and 8 of FIDE-SNPs and other aligned models. Evidence generally showed associated reductions in long-term nursing home stays in PACE (3 of 4 studies) and FIDE-SNPs and related aligned models (3 of 5 studies) but was mixed in evaluations of MMPs. Four of 9 studies of MMPs and 2 of 3 studies of FIDE-SNPs found higher outpatient use, although other studies showed no difference. Evidence on Medicaid spending was limited, whereas 8 of 10 studies of MMPs showed an association between these plans and higher Medicare spending. Evidence was mixed or inconclusive regarding care coordination and hospitalizations, and it was insufficient to evaluate patient satisfaction, health, and outcomes in beneficiary subgroups (eg, those with serious mental illness). Furthermore, studies had limited ability to control for bias from unmeasured differences between enrollees of ICPs compared with nonintegrated models. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review found variability and gaps in evidence regarding ICPs and spending, quality, utilization, and outcomes. Studies found some ICPs were associated with reductions in long-term nursing home admissions, and several identified increases in outpatient care. However, MMPs were primarily associated with higher Medicare spending. Evidence for other outcomes was limited or inconclusive. Research addressing these evidence gaps is needed to guide ongoing efforts to integrate coverage and care for dual-eligible beneficiaries.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Medicaid , Medicare , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia
17.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(7): e241907, 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028654

RESUMO

Importance: Medicare began paying for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) at opioid treatment programs (OTPs) that dispense methadone and other MOUD in January 2020. There has been little research describing the response to this payment change and whether it resulted in more patients receiving MOUD or just a shift in who pays for this care. Objective: To describe how many and which Medicare beneficiaries receive care from OTPs and how this compares to those receiving MOUD in other settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all patients receiving MOUD care identified in 2019-2022 100% US Medicare Parts B and D claims. Patients receiving care in an OTP who were dually insured with Medicare and Medicaid in the 2019-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System were also included. Exposure: Receiving MOUD care in an OTP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparisons of 2022 beneficiaries treated in OTPs vs other non-OTP settings in 2022. Results: The share of Medicare beneficiaries treated by OTPs rose steadily from 4 per 10 000 (14 160 beneficiaries) in January 2020 to 7 per 10 000 (25 596 beneficiaries) in August 2020, then plateaued through December 2022; of 38 870 patients (23% ≥66 years; 35% female) treated at an OTP in 2022, 96% received methadone. Patients in OTPs, compared to those receiving MOUD in other settings, were more likely be 65 years and younger (65% vs 62%; P < .001), less likely to be White (72% vs 82%; P < .001), and more likely to be an urban resident (86% vs 74%; P < .001). When Medicare OTP coverage began, there was no associated drop in the number of dually insured patients with Medicaid with an OTP claim. Of the 1854 OTPs, 1115 (60%) billed Medicare in 2022, with the share billing Medicare ranging from 13% to 100% across states. Conclusions and Relevance: This study showed that since the initiation of Medicare OTP coverage in 2020, there has been a rapid increase in the number of Medicare beneficiaries with claims for OTP services for MOUD, and most OTPs have begun billing Medicare. Patients in OTPs were more likely to be urban residents and members of racial or ethnic minority groups than the patients receiving other forms of MOUD.


Assuntos
Medicare , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/economia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/estatística & dados numéricos , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e57290, 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant complication in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to increased mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the burden of CKD in Medicaid-enrolled adults with SCD in California, examine differences in disease burden between male and female individuals, and assess mortality rates and access to specialized care. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the California Sickle Cell Data Collection program to identify and monitor individuals with SCD. Medicaid claims, vital records, emergency department, and hospitalization data from 2011 to 2020 were analyzed. CKD prevalence was assessed based on ICD (International Classification of Diseases) codes, and mortality rates were calculated. Access to specialized care was examined through outpatient encounter rates with hematologists and nephrologists. RESULTS: Among the 2345 adults with SCD, 24.4% (n=572) met the case definition for CKD. The SCD-CKD group was older at the beginning of this study (average age 44, SD 14 vs 34, SD 12.6 years) than the group without CKD. CKD prevalence increased with age, revealing significant disparities by sex. While the youngest (18-29 years) and oldest (>65 years) groups showed similar CKD prevalences between sexes (female: 12/111, 10.8% and male: 12/101, 11.9%; female: 74/147, 50.3% and male: 34/66, 51.5%, respectively), male individuals in the aged 30-59 years bracket exhibited significantly higher rates than female individuals (30-39 years: 49/294, 16.7%, P=.01; 40-49 years: 52/182, 28.6%, P=.02; and 50-59 years: 76/157,48.4%, P<.001). During this study, of the 2345 adults, 435 (18.5%) deaths occurred, predominantly within the SCD-CKD cohort (226/435, 39.5%). The median age at death was 53 (IQR 61-44) years for the SCD-CKD group compared to 43 (IQR 33-56) years for the SCD group, with male individuals in the SCD-CKD group showing significantly higher mortality rates (111/242, 45.9%; P=.009) than female individuals (115/330, 34.9%). Access to specialist care was notably limited: approximately half (281/572, 49.1%) of the SCD-CKD cohort had no hematologist visits, and 61.9% (354/572) did not see a nephrologist during this study's period. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides robust estimates of CKD prevalence and mortality among Medicaid-enrolled adults with SCD in California. The findings highlight the need for improved access to specialized care for this population and increased awareness of the high mortality risk and progression associated with CKD.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicaid , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , California/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Anemia Falciforme/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2421711, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046743

RESUMO

Importance: Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) decisions for critically injured trauma patients are complicated and multifactorial, with potential for patients' insurance status to affect decision-making. Objectives: To determine if patient insurance type (private insurance, Medicaid, and uninsured) is associated with time to WLST in critically injured adults cared for at US trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective registry-based cohort study included reported data from level I and level II trauma centers in the US that participated in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) registry. Participants included adult trauma patients who were injured between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, and required an intensive care unit stay. Patients were excluded if they died on arrival or in the emergency department or had a preexisting do not resuscitate directive. Analyses were performed on December 12, 2023. Exposures: Insurance type (private insurance, Medicaid, uninsured). Main Outcomes and Measures: An adjusted time-to-event analysis for association between insurance status and time to WLST was performed, with analyses accounting for clustering by hospital. Results: This study included 307 731 patients, of whom 160 809 (52.3%) had private insurance, 88 233 (28.6%) had Medicaid, and 58 689 (19.1%) were uninsured. The mean (SD) age was 40.2 (14.1) years, 232 994 (75.7%) were male, 59 551 (19.4%) were African American or Black patients, and 201 012 (65.3%) were White patients. In total, 12 962 patients (4.2%) underwent WLST during their admission. Patients who are uninsured were significantly more likely to undergo earlier WLST compared with those with private insurance (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.46-1.62) and Medicaid (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.39-1.55). This finding was robust to sensitivity analysis excluding patients who died within 48 hours of presentation and after accounting for nonwithdrawal death as a competing risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US adult trauma patients who were critically injured, patients who were uninsured underwent earlier WLST compared with those with private or Medicaid insurance. Based on our findings, patient's ability to pay was may be associated with a shift in decision-making for WLST, suggesting the influence of socioeconomics on patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Suspensão de Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Estados Unidos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso
20.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6): e241472, 2024 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874960

RESUMO

Importance: Millions of economically disadvantaged children depend on Medicaid for dental care, with states differing in whether they deliver these benefits using fee-for-service or capitated managed care payment models. However, there is limited research examining the association between managed care and the accessibility of dental services. Objective: To estimate the association between the adoption of managed care for dental services in Florida's Medicaid program and nontraumatic dental emergency department visits and associated charges. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used an event-study difference-in-differences design, leveraging Florida Medicaid's staggered adoption of managed care to examine its association with pediatric nontraumatic dental emergency department visits and associated charges. This study included all Florida emergency department visits from 2010 to 2014 in which the patient was 17 years or younger, the patient was a Florida resident, Medicaid paid for the visit, and a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code was used to classify a nontraumatic dental condition. Analyses were conducted between May 2023 and April 2024. Exposure: The county of residence transitioning Medicaid dental services from fee-for-service to a fully capitated managed care program managed by a dental plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The rate of nontraumatic dental emergency department visits per 100 000 pediatric Medicaid enrollees and the associated mean charges per visit. Nontraumatic dental emergency department visits are a well-documented proxy for access to dental care. Data on emergency department visit counts came from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. Medicaid population denominators were derived from the American Community Survey's 5-year estimates. Results: Among the 34 414 pediatric nontraumatic dental emergency department visits that met inclusion criteria across Florida's 67 counties, the mean (SD) age of patients was 8.11 (5.28) years, and 50.8% of patients were male. Of these, 10 087 visits occurred in control counties and 24 327 in treatment counties. Control counties generally had lower rates of NTDC ED visits per 100 000 enrollees compared with treatment counties (123.5 vs 132.7). Over the first 2.5 years of implementation, the adoption of managed care was associated with an 11.3% (95% CI, 4.0%-18.4%; P = .002) increase in nontraumatic dental emergency department visits compared with pre-implementation levels. There was no evidence that the average charge per visit changed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Florida Medicaid's adoption of managed care for pediatric dental services was associated with increased emergency department visits for children, which could be associated with decreased access to dental care.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Florida , Criança , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Lactente , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/economia , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA