[Basic research in sepsis: advances and challenges].

Although the understanding of sepsis has evolved from "sepsis 1.0" to "sepsis 3.0", and the consensus on clinical management of sepsis has been continuously updated, the incidence rate and mortality of sepsis remain high. Therefore, in-depth investigation of the pathogenesis and related influencing factors of sepsis is of great significance for revealing the nature of sepsis and improving the clinical outcome of sepsis patients. This review will focus on the key issues in the basic research of sepsis, and summarize the recent advances and challenges in this field, mainly including genetic polymorphism, microorganisms, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), endothelial dysfunction, immunotherapy, and biomarkers, aiming to provide new insights for the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.

Fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a secondary analysis of the CLOVERS trial.

BACKGROUND: Early fluid management in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and sepsis-induced hypotension is challenging with limited evidence to support treatment recommendations. We aimed to compare an early restrictive versus liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included patients with advanced CKD (eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or history of end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis) from the crystalloid liberal or vasopressor early resuscitation in sepsis (CLOVERS) trial. The primary endpoint was death from any cause before discharge home by day 90. RESULTS: Of 1563 participants enrolled in the CLOVERS trial, 196 participants had advanced CKD (45% on chronic dialysis), with 92 participants randomly assigned to the restrictive treatment group and 104 assigned to the liberal fluid group. Death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 occurred significantly less often in the restrictive fluid group compared with the liberal fluid group (20 [21.7%] vs. 41 [39.4%], HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.29-0.85). Participants in the restrictive fluid group had more vasopressor-free days (19.7 ± 10.4 days vs. 15.4 ± 12.6 days; mean difference 4.3 days, 95% CI, 1.0-7.5) and ventilator-free days by day 28 (21.0 ± 11.8 vs. 16.5 ± 13.6 days; mean difference 4.5 days, 95% CI, 0.9-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CKD and sepsis-induced hypotension, an early restrictive fluid strategy, prioritizing vasopressor use, was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 as compared with an early liberal fluid strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03434028 (2018-02-09), BioLINCC 14149.

Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health due to its high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods for identifying sepsis or its causative organisms are time-consuming and contribute to a high mortality rate. Biomarkers have been developed to overcome these limitations and are currently used for sepsis diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment response assessment. Over the past few decades, more than 250 biomarkers have been identified, a few of which have been used in clinical decision-making. Consistent with the limitations of diagnosing sepsis, there is currently no specific treatment for sepsis. Currently, the general treatment for sepsis is conservative and includes timely antibiotic use and hemodynamic support. When planning sepsis-specific treatment, it is important to select the most suitable patient, considering the heterogeneous nature of sepsis. This comprehensive review summarizes current and evolving biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for sepsis.

Plasma for prevention and treatment of glycocalyx degradation in trauma and sepsis.

The endothelial glycocalyx, a gel-like layer that lines the luminal surface of blood vessels, is composed of proteoglycans, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans. The endothelial glycocalyx plays an essential role in vascular homeostasis, and its degradation in trauma and sepsis can lead to microvascular dysfunction and organ injury. While there are no proven therapies for preventing or treating endothelial glycocalyx degradation, some initial literature suggests that plasma may have a therapeutic role in trauma and sepsis patients. Overall, the literature suggesting the use of plasma as a therapy for endothelial glycocalyx degradation is non-clinical basic science or exploratory. Plasma is an established therapy in the resuscitation of patients with hemorrhage for restoration of coagulation factors. However, plasma also contains other bioactive components, including sphingosine-1 phosphate, antithrombin, and adiponectin, which may protect and restore the endothelial glycocalyx, thereby helping to maintain or restore vascular homeostasis. This narrative review begins by describing the endothelial glycocalyx in health and disease: we discuss the overlapping disease mechanisms in trauma and sepsis that lead to its damage and introduce plasma transfusion as a potential therapy for prevention and treatment of endothelial glycocalyx degradation. Second, we review the literature on plasma as an exploratory therapy for endothelial glycocalyx degradation in trauma and sepsis. Third, we discuss the safety of plasma transfusion by reviewing the adverse events associated with plasma and other blood product transfusions, and we examine modern transfusion precautions that have enhanced the safety of plasma transfusion. We conclude that the literature proposes that plasma may have the potential to prevent and treat endothelial glycocalyx degradation in trauma and sepsis, indicating the need for further research.

Compact bone mesenchymal stem cells-derived paracrine mediators for cell-free therapy in sepsis.

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition resulting in multiple organ dysfunction, is characterized by a dysregulated immune response to infection. Current treatment options are limited, leading to unsatisfactory outcomes for septic patients. Here, we present a series of studies utilizing compact bone mesenchymal stem cells (CB-MSCs) and their derived paracrine mediators, especially exosome (CB-MSCs-Exo), to treat mice with cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis. Our results demonstrate that CB-MSCs treatment significantly improves the survival rate of septic mice by mitigating excessive inflammatory response and attenuating sepsis-induced organ injuries. Furthermore, CB-MSCs-conditioned medium, CB-MSCs secretome (CB-MSCs-Sec), and CB-MSCs-Exo exhibit potent anti-inflammatory effects in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated murine macrophage (RAW264.7). Intriguingly, intravenous administration of CB-MSCs-Exo confers superior protection against inflammation and organ damage in septic mice compared to CB-MSCs in certain aspects. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) shotgun proteomic analysis, we identify a range of characterized proteins derived from the paracrine activity of CB-MSCs, involved in critical biological processes such as immunomodulation and apoptosis. Our findings highlight that the paracrine products of CB-MSCs could serve as a promising cell-free therapeutic agent for sepsis.

Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Early detection and management of sepsis are crucial for patient survival. Emergency departments (EDs) play a key role in sepsis management but face challenges in timely response due to high patient volumes. Sepsis alert systems are proposed to expedite diagnosis and treatment initiation per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Objective: To review and analyze the association of sepsis alert systems in EDs with patient outcomes. Data Sources: A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2004, to November 19, 2023. Study Selection: Studies that evaluated sepsis alert systems specifically designed for adult ED patients were evaluated. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed, full-text articles in English that reported on mortality, ICU admissions, hospital stay duration, and sepsis management adherence. Exclusion criteria included studies that lacked a control group or quantitative reports. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two independent reviewers conducted the data extraction using a standardized form. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. The data were synthesized using a random-effects model due to the expected heterogeneity among the included studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Key outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit admissions, hospital stay duration, and adherence to the sepsis bundle. Results: Of 3281 initially identified studies, 22 (0.67%) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 19 580 patients. Sepsis alert systems were associated with reduced mortality risk (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91) and length of hospital stay (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.15; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.11). These systems were also associated with better adherence to sepsis bundle elements, notably in terms of shorter time to fluid administration (SMD, -0.42; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.32), blood culture (SMD, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.40 to -0.21), antibiotic administration (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.29), and lactate measurement (SMD, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.08). Electronic alerts were particularly associated with reduced mortality (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.92) and adherence with blood culture guidelines (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.27). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that sepsis alert systems in EDs were associated with better patient outcomes along with better adherence to sepsis management protocols. These systems hold promise for enhancing ED responses to sepsis, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.

Embracing a New Evidence-Based Thought Paradigm of Sepsis.

ABSTRACT: In 1991, sepsis was first defined by the Society of Critical Care Medicine as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, in the presence of infection. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is an adaptive host response to infection, as well as to other insults like trauma and stress. Research pertaining to sepsis was guided by this adaptive definition for 25 years. After established guidelines for sepsis management were challenged in 2014, sepsis was redefined in 2016 as a dysregulated host response to infection. However, there still remains no consensus on which immunologic or metabolic mechanisms have become dysregulated. We sought to examine sepsis literature published after the 2016 consensus definition and compare it to the original systemic inflammatory response syndrome paradigm proposed in 1991. The purpose of this intensive analysis was to recommend a new sepsis archetype, with consideration to dysregulated immunologic and metabolic mechanisms that have recently been identified in sepsis. Nurses and other clinicians must shift their thought paradigm toward an evidence-based dysregulated model, in order to improve on sepsis recognition and management.

Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis.

Sepsis-associated kidney injury is common in critically ill patients and significantly increases morbidity and mortality rates. Several complex pathophysiological factors contribute to its presentation and perpetuation, including macrocirculatory and microcirculatory changes, mitochondrial dysfunction, and metabolic reprogramming. Recovery from acute kidney injury (AKI) relies on the evolution towards adaptive mechanisms such as endothelial repair and tubular cell regeneration, while maladaptive repair increases the risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. Fundamental management strategies include early sepsis recognition and prompt treatment, through the administration of adequate antimicrobial agents, fluid resuscitation, and vasoactive agents as needed. In septic patients, organ-specific support is often required, particularly renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the setting of severe AKI, although ongoing debates persist regarding the ideal timing of initiation and dosing of RRT. A comprehensive approach integrating early recognition, targeted interventions, and close monitoring is essential to mitigate the burden of SA-AKI and improve patient outcomes in critical care settings.

Failure to Rescue as a Quality Measure in Sepsis.

This Viewpoint discusses the limitations of current tools to improve sepsis outcomes and proposes that these tools be supplemented with "failure to rescue," a systems-level approach for recognizing and addressing complications and managing sepsis throughout the hospitalization period.

Glucans: A Therapeutic Alternative for Sepsis Treatment.

Sepsis treatment is a challenging condition due to its complexity, which involves host inflammatory responses to a severe and potentially fatal infection, associated with organ dysfunction. The aim of this study was to analyze the scientific literature on the immunomodulatory effects of glucans in a murine model of systemic infection induced by cecal ligation and puncture. This study comprises an integrative literature review based on systematic steps, with searches carried out in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. In most studies, the main type of glucan investigated was ß-glucan, at 50 mg/kg, and a reduction of inflammatory responses was identified, minimizing the occurrence of tissue damage leading to increased animal survival. Based on the data obtained and discussed in this review, glucans represent a promising biotechnological alternative to modulate the immune response and could potentially be used in the clinical management of septic individuals.

Volume control strategy and patient survival in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial with secondary analysis.

Optimal strategy for volume control and the clinical implication of achieved volume control are unknown in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the survival according to conventional or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided volume control strategy in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT. We also compared patient survival according to achieved volume accumulation rate ([cumulative fluid balance during 3 days × 100]/fluid overload measured by BIA at enrollment) as a post-hoc analysis. We randomly assigned patients to conventional volume control strategy (n = 39) or to BIA-guided volume control strategy (n = 34). There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.63-2.23) or 90-day mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.57-1.75) between conventional and BIA-guided volume control group. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was significantly associated with patient survival. Compared with the achieved volume accumulation rate of ≤ - 50%, the HRs (95% CIs) for the risk of 90-day mortality were 1.21 (0.29-5.01), 0.55 (0.12-2.48), and 7.18 (1.58-32.51) in that of - 50-0%, 1-50%, and > 50%, respectively. Hence, BIA-guided volume control in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT did not improve patient outcomes. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was associated with patient survival.

Maritime Applications of Prolonged Casualty Care Sepsis on a Destroyer During Distributed Maritime Operations.

During distributed maritime operations, individual components of the naval force are more geographically dispersed. As the U.S. Navy further develops this concept, smaller vessels may be operating at a significant time and distance away from more advanced medical capabilities. Therefore, during both current and future contested Distributed Maritime Operations, Role 1 maritime caregivers such as Independent Duty Corpsman will have to manage patients for prolonged periods of time. This manuscript presents an innovative approach to teaching complex operational medicine concepts (including Prolonged Casualty Care [PCC]) to austere Role 1 maritime caregivers using a hypothetical scenario involving a patient with sepsis and septic shock. The scenario incorporates the Joint Trauma System PCC Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) and other standard references. The scenario includes a stem clinical vignette, expected clinical changes for the affected patient at specific time points (e.g., time 0, 1, 2, and 48h), and expected interventions based on the PCC CPG and available shipboard equipment. Epidemiology of sepsis in the deployed environment is also reviewed. This process also identifies opportunities to improve training, clinical skills sustainment, and standard shipboard medical supplies.

Effect of the 1-h bundle on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department: a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of the 1-h bundle for emergency department (ED) patients with suspected sepsis, which includes lactate measurement, blood culture, broad-spectrum antibiotics administration, administration of 30 mL/kg crystalloid fluid for hypotension or lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, remains controversial. METHODS: We carried out a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in 23 EDs in France and Spain. Adult patients with Sepsis-3 criteria or a quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2 or a lactate > 2 mmol/L were eligible. The intervention was the implementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality truncated at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included volume of fluid resuscitation at 24 h, acute heart failure at 24 h, SOFA score at 72 h, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, number of days on mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, vasopressor free days, unnecessary antibiotic administration, and mortality at 28 days. 1148 patients were planned to be analysed; the study period ended after 873 patients were included. RESULTS: 872 patients (mean age 66, 42% female) were analyzed: 387 (44.4%) in the intervention group and 485 (55.6%) in the control group. Median SOFA score was 3 [1-5]. Median time to antibiotic administration was 40 min in the intervention group vs 113 min in the control group (difference - 73 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 93 to - 53]). There was a significantly higher rate, volume, and shorter time to fluid resuscitation within 3 h in the intervention group. There were 47 (12.1%) in-hospital deaths in the intervention group compared to 61 (12.6%) in the control group (difference in percentage - 0.4 [95% CI - 5.1 to 4.2], adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.48 to 1.39]). There were no differences between groups for other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED, the implementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle was not associated with significant difference in in-hospital mortality. However, this study may be underpowered to report a statistically significant difference between groups.

Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition which may arise from infection in any organ system and requires early recognition and management. Healthcare professionals working in any specialty may need to manage patients with sepsis. Educating medical students about this condition may be an effective way to ensure all future doctors have sufficient ability to diagnose and treat septic patients. However, there is currently no consensus on what competencies medical students should achieve regarding sepsis recognition and treatment. This study aims to outline what sepsis-related competencies medical students should achieve by the end of their medical student training in both high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions and in low or lower-middle income countries/regions. METHODS: Two separate panels from high or upper-middle income and low or lower-middle income countries/regions participated in a Delphi method to suggest and rank sepsis competencies for medical students. Each panel consisted of 13-18 key stakeholders of medical education and doctors in specialties where sepsis is a common problem (both specialists and trainees). Panelists came from all continents, except Antarctica. RESULTS: The panels reached consensus on 38 essential sepsis competencies in low or lower-middle income countries/regions and 33 in high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions. These include competencies such as definition of sepsis and septic shock and urgency of antibiotic treatment. In the low or lower-middle income countries/regions group, consensus was also achieved for competencies ranked as very important, and was achieved in 4/5 competencies rated as moderately important. In the high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions group, consensus was achieved in 41/57 competencies rated as very important but only 6/11 competencies rated as moderately important. CONCLUSION: Medical schools should consider developing curricula to address essential competencies, as a minimum, but also consider addressing competencies rated as very or moderately important.

How to determine the focus of emergent medical care in healthcare policy: Proposal of treatable death.

INTRODUCTION: The global provision of essential healthcare stands as a critical concern. Consequently, healthcare policies play a pivotal role in determining the allocation of resources. However, the optimal indicators for prioritizing such policies remain uncertain. This study proposes that employing the concept of treatable mortality in a stepwise manner could serve as a viable approach to setting healthcare policy priorities. Furthermore, it aims to demonstrate this concept through the application of real-world data. METHODS: A model was developed to assess treatable mortality at a national level focusing on severe emergency conditions. We established stepwise targets, encompassing short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals to reduce mortality rates and enhance healthcare efficiency. The short-term target consists of directing attention to regions exhibiting in-hospital mortality rates surpassing the national average within a specific disease category and reducing them to the national average. The mid-term objective entails decreasing the in-hospital mortality rate of the specific disease group to match that of the region with the lowest rate nationwide. As for long-term target, it aligns the in-hospital mortality rate with that of OECD countries possessing average or lowest rates. The model was applied using data from South Korea's National Emergency Department Information System, specifically analyzing acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and sepsis. RESULTS: Reaching the short-term target resulted in the treatable deaths for AMI numbered 191, for stroke 249, and for sepsis 546. Meeting the mid-term target led to treatable deaths for AMI at 749, for stroke at 958, and for sepsis at 1552. Finally, achieving the long-term target yielded the treatable deaths for AMI at 2606, for stroke at 1642, and for sepsis at 2619. Consequently, a reallocation of more healthcare resources to sepsis over AMI or stroke is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes the utilization of treatable mortality as a metric for establishing healthcare policies. The stepwise approach provides valuable insights for policymaking at various levels. Despite limitations, the model offers a foundation for resource allocation and international mortality rate comparisons, aiming for achievable rates worldwide.

Near-miss and maternal sepsis mortality: A qualitative study of survivors and support persons.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that maternal deaths due to sepsis occur due to delays in recognition, treatment, and escalation of care through medical chart reviews. This study was conducted to obtain the patient perspective for near-miss and maternal mortality cases due to sepsis. OBJECTIVE: To identify quality improvement opportunities for improving maternal sepsis through patient and support person experiences. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty semi-structured interviews and three follow-up focus groups with patients who experienced critical illness from maternal sepsis in the United States and their support persons (when available) were conducted from May 23, 2022, through October 14, 2022. In this qualitative study, data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In this qualitative study of patients with maternal sepsis and their support persons, four main quality improvement themes were identified. The themes were the following: (1) participants reported a lack of awareness of pregnancy-related warning signs and symptoms of when to seek care, (2) many of the presenting symptoms participants experienced were not typical of expected warning signs of maternal sepsis, such as severe pain, overwhelming tiredness, and lack of fever (3) participant concerns were met with dismissal leading to delays in diagnosis, (4) participants experienced long-term sequelae but had difficulty receiving screening and referrals for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that standardized patient education about the warning signs of maternal sepsis and provider education about the presentation of maternal sepsis, improved listening to patients, and follow-up for sequalae of sepsis are needed.